Share this comment
There are many possible explanations.
It is the case that many diseases have been suspected to have been caused by contagion and later discovered to have been caused by entirely different factors. I believe scurvy is one example of such a disease (although there is a more commonly cited example which I cannot recall right now).
It is also …
There are many possible explanations.
It is the case that many diseases have been suspected to have been caused by contagion and later discovered to have been caused by entirely different factors. I believe scurvy is one example of such a disease (although there is a more commonly cited example which I cannot recall right now).
It is also the case that viruses may exist (I don't think so, but am not certain) and measles may be a disease caused by a virus while at the same time other diseases which are claimed to be caused by viruses (e.g. AIDS, covid, polio) are not caused by viruses.
If measles (or any other disease) were indeed contagious and caused by a virus it should be easy to show contagion in a controlled experiment. However I believe that contagion has never been successfully shown for any disease supposedly caused by a virus despite a number of attempts. And the fact that this has not been shown when it should have been easy to do so, is very suspicious.
Hmm. It's a big step to go from "these diseases are not caused by a virus, but some are" to "there is no such thing as a virus".
This "no virus" bullshit is part of a plan cooked up to be able to implement the diabolical One Health "policy" through the Pandemic Treaty. It needs to stop because it plays perfectly into "their" filthy murderous hands. They are counting on YOUR DOUBT and IGNORANCE to pull this off. For God's sake, do NOT take my word for it. Meryl Nass, bless here UNBLAMING, NON-DEFENSIVE TRUTH-TELLING HEART, wrote about this in a recent substack from either Saturday or Sunday this past week.
I am (a non-paying freeloader) a subscriber to Meryl Nass's substack. I'll have to go back and read that one because I haven't had a chance. I remember she mentioned it a couple of weeks back wondering what this was about.
Do you happen to know the date? I've just checked and am not seeing specifically where she has recently referred to the "no virus" BS.
I think the idea that there are no viruses is a bunch of crap.
I think this is the article: https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-no-viruses-exist-cult-has-been
To be honest it's disappointing. Nass's approach seems almost deceptive - reminiscent of the mainstream's media's approach to her in fact.
She essentially ridicules the "no virus" theory by mischaracterizing their position, and setting up straw men.
I am by no means certain that the no virus crew are correct, but their arguments are much stronger than Nass allows, and Nass's piece is rife with logical fallacies.
(a) I would be interested in that article too.
(b) Just out of interest, why do you think the "no-virus" idea is a bunch of crap? FWIW I thought that for some time, but then I delved into the matter (not a massive delve - but I spent about three days looking into it, and exchanged e-mails with some people in both camps) and came to the conclusion that - at the very least - viruses were very, very far from proven to be the cause of diseases.
I was looking for it, too, and even replied to one of her regularly-appearing subs on that post but haven't found it, will need to look some more, I may have "starred" the post. Was it the one a few days ago about why Davos is so interested in Disease X? That said, I distinctly remember that Meryl did in fact cover this very topic, within the past week or so. I believe since last Sunday.
Viruses is all fakery.
The kooks had >70 years to prove otherwise.
There are pictures of viruses. You're not a real human. You're a fake.
I am saying that there are many possibilities, and giving examples of what is possible, where no viruses, some viruses, all viruses are all possibilities.
But I don't think of these possibilities as "steps" where one moves from one to another.
The reasons (at least the ones that I accept) to believe that there are no viruses are as follows:
(1) It should be easy to prove the existence of contagion for any viral disease if they are in fact contagious.
(2) It should also be possible to reliably correlate the presence or amount of the virus with sickness
(3) Neither of these things have been shown for any virus as far as I am aware (although I am no expert, so I remain open to the possibility that despite court cases and unanswered challenges etc. such proof does in fact exist somewhere).
PS (edited) Another big set of reasons to be suspicious are
(a) the very large amount of money made from "viruses" and "vaccines"
(b) what is known about the nature, goals, activities, and moral habits of the Rockefeller (and now Gates) families who have controlled the narrative around viruses and vaccines for so long - corrupting first medical schools, then politicians, then the academic press and finally the mainstream media as their ill gotten gains increased with each new corruption.
Still I am not 100% certain though.
In the case of scurvy, the Royal Navy figured out in the 18th century that it was a good idea to give lime juice to the sailors. But not all ship captains actually did it. And later on, around the time of the Scott expedition, there was a belief that scurvy was caused by "ptomaine poisoning" which was totally wrong of course. But I can certainly understand how people would have assumed that it was a contagious disease before they learned about the value of citrus juice.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23734365/