I am saying that there are many possibilities, and giving examples of what is possible, where no viruses, some viruses, all viruses are all possibilities.
But I don't think of these possibilities as "steps" where one moves from one to another.
The reasons (at least the ones that I accept) to believe that there are no viruses are as follows:
I am saying that there are many possibilities, and giving examples of what is possible, where no viruses, some viruses, all viruses are all possibilities.
But I don't think of these possibilities as "steps" where one moves from one to another.
The reasons (at least the ones that I accept) to believe that there are no viruses are as follows:
(1) It should be easy to prove the existence of contagion for any viral disease if they are in fact contagious.
(2) It should also be possible to reliably correlate the presence or amount of the virus with sickness
(3) Neither of these things have been shown for any virus as far as I am aware (although I am no expert, so I remain open to the possibility that despite court cases and unanswered challenges etc. such proof does in fact exist somewhere).
PS (edited) Another big set of reasons to be suspicious are
(a) the very large amount of money made from "viruses" and "vaccines"
(b) what is known about the nature, goals, activities, and moral habits of the Rockefeller (and now Gates) families who have controlled the narrative around viruses and vaccines for so long - corrupting first medical schools, then politicians, then the academic press and finally the mainstream media as their ill gotten gains increased with each new corruption.
I am saying that there are many possibilities, and giving examples of what is possible, where no viruses, some viruses, all viruses are all possibilities.
But I don't think of these possibilities as "steps" where one moves from one to another.
The reasons (at least the ones that I accept) to believe that there are no viruses are as follows:
(1) It should be easy to prove the existence of contagion for any viral disease if they are in fact contagious.
(2) It should also be possible to reliably correlate the presence or amount of the virus with sickness
(3) Neither of these things have been shown for any virus as far as I am aware (although I am no expert, so I remain open to the possibility that despite court cases and unanswered challenges etc. such proof does in fact exist somewhere).
PS (edited) Another big set of reasons to be suspicious are
(a) the very large amount of money made from "viruses" and "vaccines"
(b) what is known about the nature, goals, activities, and moral habits of the Rockefeller (and now Gates) families who have controlled the narrative around viruses and vaccines for so long - corrupting first medical schools, then politicians, then the academic press and finally the mainstream media as their ill gotten gains increased with each new corruption.
Still I am not 100% certain though.