I agree but if he knew this why did he wait until now to speak about it. It appears as if he is riding on you and Katherine's thunder. I am glad he is talking about it but I find it hard to believe he didn't know about this before or is he breaking this news based on your research? He needs to say that as many others have done. They acknowledge the work of both you and Katherine. If he does not state that he did his own research after your research exposed the DOD and HHS agreement then that means to the public he knew all along but waited for someone else to break the ice.
The more provable litigation lies in what is already demonstrable and on the record in regards to the hospital protocols.
Why does RFK's team and Bigtree's team avoid this?
A lot of people are under the misconception that RFK and Bigtree are against vaccines. They are not- they stake their ground on wanting "safe vaccines" an oxymoron if ever there was one.
Here's a snippet from a Q&A with RFK:
Q: Rates of childhood infectious diseases have plummeted over the past half-century or so. Are you out to return us to the dark ages?
Kennedy: "I am for vaccines. I have been tracking mercury in fish for 30 years and nobody has called me antifish. I am pro-vaccine. I had all my kids vaccinated. I think vaccines save lives. But we are also seeing an explosion in neurodevelopmental disorders and we ought to be able to do a cost-benefit analysis and see what's causing them. We ought to have robust, transparent science and an independent regulatory agency. Nobody is trying to get rid of vaccines here. I just want safe vaccines."
I agree that all of these injections from the 19th century onward have never been (nor can they be) safe and effective. RFK, Jr is a politician by inclination. You no doubt know the characteristics that embodies. He and Bigtree are speaking poli-speak. Nothing to do with science or certainly not the truth. As of late he's shown disdain regarding those who have researched the matter and come up with a clear verdict: there's no pathogenic virus - EVER. It's the emperor's clothes, and the injection is toxic with all kinds of junk running through the bodies of those who succumbed.
Kennedy has evolved under this massive psy-op as a gatekeeper of sorts. He wants nothing to do with the fact that no pathogenic virus has been found using the premises of the scientific method. The scale of the psy-op is 1,000 fold anything encountered before. Once people grasp what this really is than we can stop playing games about "spike proteins".
Fauci is a front, as are all the regulatory bodies such as FDA, CDC (as we see in Ohio including EPA, in transportation FAA, FCC 5G rollout, etc. etc.).
Operationally this does seem to be a military ops regarding the jab following the likes of the so-called anthrax injection campaign.
The entire system is privately owned and ruled. The president is just an order taker - the Office of the President was captured long ago - the office that has some authority to issue proclamations, executive orders, and oversee military (domestic and foreign).
RFK is a very smart and able man and has been working in our defense for a very long time. Look at all his environmental legislation. He spoke out all over europe and elsewhere during the lockdowns putting his life at risk. That's way more than 99 % of us ever did. I am so sick of the attacks on him. He and his cohorts came up with strategies when everyone else could only talk about fleeing the country. He has shown great leadership, courage and intelligence. Most people think they are being courageous by weighing in on the internet. I suggest that there are being out on the street, talking to people in person, organizing etc are far more important and I hope that people will follow RFK's courageous lead.
Every body can't do everything. But every body can do something.
I gave up on saviors a long time ago. His org has garnered millions.
Do you know, for example, that the US has, combined local, state and federal 300,000 laws on the books regarding gun control and yet....
Laws haven't gotten us clean drinking water, soil, air. We have roughly 1,000 rail derailments, some like Ohio's and Detroit's are emitted tons of toxins. What did the EPA do about this?
What RFK, Jr. misses is that it's the system that's the underlying problem not more laws or regulations. The entire system and its institutions are thoroughly captured and corrupted.
In this interview Jess is clearly and unequivocally a virus skeptic - to put it mildly. Sasha will have to speak directly to this. She seems to lean in that direction, but as I've has some back and forth with her, she seems the jab manufacturing process along with Katherine Watt's legal findings seem to be her focus. (I get the sense she's coy about this. Perhaps she doesn't want to "burn bridges???)
Personally, I agree with Jess and those who claim there's no scientific proof of a pathogenic virus. The "spike protein" was manufactured in a computer along with the assemblage of a "virus".
I would say that this combined with a catalog of specimens (again never proven to come from nature) were used to provide the basis of the scam, and used in some fashion to create the jab formula. Like Sasha I do think the manufacturing of these billions of vials are highly contaminated and lack sufficient quality checks (based on DARPA specs). So the shots can cause all kinds of bad effects (including death) depending on the roll of the dice.
I saw a cartoon of a couple of guys in white coats. One has a manic expression of excited discovery on his face, the other looks quizzical. They are standing in front of a blackboard that has two furious storms of mathematical symbols which resolve at the bottom with a triumphal, underlined =0!! Between the two dense paragraphs of math there is a little phrase in parentheses that says: (then a miracle occurs...) The unconvinced one is pointing at it and saying, тАЬUhhh, can you go into a little more detail explaining what happens between step one and step two?тАЭ
Cowan, Kaufman, and Lanka have performed great service in helping the lay person understand their challenges to тАЬvirologyтАЭ but Dr. Sam Bailey breaks it down really well also. The problem as I see it now is that there are some black boxes labeled тАЬthen a miracle occursтАЭ that are being accepted by some practitioners in the field as solid indications of causality between steps and they are not. The black boxes are hidden in the jargon that is bandied about by the тАЬexpertsтАЭ unquestioningly, giving each other dispensations from the rigors of actual scientific inquiry, probably because they are getting paid anyway for research based on presumptions that are not true... But hey, who is to say that in an eleven-dimensional realm, a train built of playing cards that gets derailed CANтАЩT just bounce back on the tracks and continue and score a touchdown, in silico?
Discerning smoke and mirrors from reality. Some of it is the rigorous use logic/reason and some is sensibility.
I think the "nuclear" bombs said to have hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki was really the white coats attempt to claim a victory when they couldn't perfect such a bomb in the lab or field, and so staged events which were than perpetrated on Japan. The threat was thus born and sustained to this day.
Virology is just an example of what happens when failure cannot be admitted, and when funding requires it be covered up for other purposes. (I suspect science's inquiry has led us down strange cul de sacs. (The nefarious Nobel Prize awards are complicit.)
Who said the following? In what setting and on what date?
Bonus points for providing context.
"Okay, so let me push back on you.
Yeah. You know, I think most people are going to recommend here, which is that the reason that you had these huge number of deaths in Paris and New York and for example, in northern Italy, which you did not mention in Tuscany, the same time as earlier, actually, than the spikes that I was mentioning.
I'd love to hear your explanation for that. Because that seemed to be I mean, that's where we all got the idea that this virus was galloping through and killing lots and lots of people. And they didn't have remdesivir in Italy at that time, so oh, something was killing people.
And couldn't it be that the virus landed in those places, you know, it lands in big cities, it spreads in big cities much more quickly, because there's denser populations. And of course, there's 35 states that just don't have dense populations where the virus didn't reach or infect large groups of people for a long period of time."
Part of the reason for people dying were certain protocols that were followed in those countries: Intubate them while the oxygen saturation is still around 90 or above. Due to protocol early intubation was to protect the doctors and nurses at a time when the viral load of that allegedly highly lethal pathogen was allegedly lower. This is all nonsense. In Germany lung doctors saw that that protocol that was applied in Italy was an overreaction, and decided that this was nonsense, and so they did not intubate those people and instead would just give patients oxygen as they had previously done with respiratory diseases. Also in Northern Italy, Lombardy, they have a huge asbestos problem from occupational asbestos exposure in 1960s and 1970s. By the way: a lot of asbestos was also used in the ship manufacturing in New York, New Orleans. And France also has that occupational asbestos exposure particularly of males. There is a study that predicts a rise of malignant mesothelioma (MM) in Lombardy until approx 2019. "This study documented a high burden of MM in both genders in the Lombardy Region, reflecting extensive occupational (mainly in men) and non-occupational (mainly in women) exposure to asbestos in the past. Incidence rates are still increasing; a downturn in occurrence of MM is expected to occur after 2019."
There is furthermore a Harvard study that there is a clear link between long-term exposure to PM2.5 particles (for example from garbage incinerators, air pollution in general) and Covid-19 deaths.
This causal connection between air pollution and dying of respiratory diseases has been known for decades.
I doubt whether Sasha Latypova's observation that there must be an extra neurotoxin exposure of some sort that would cause loss of smell and taste is correct. As some physicians have pointed out respiratory diseases such as flu also cause loss of smell and taste. Plus it is known that anxiety can have a similar effect on your nervous system, i.e. loss of smell and taste. Plus nocebo effect is also at work here. Tell people again and again on TV and newspapers over several months continiously that Covid goes along not only with common cold symptons such as cough, fever, runny nose, diarrea but also with loss of taste and smell, and a lot more people will report a loss of smell and taste. I know people who in the absence of a positive PCR test, and even in the presence of a negative PCR test claim that they must have had Covid since they lost their smell and taste. I realize that the latter observation could in fact support Sasha's hypothesis that the government sprayed some unknown neurotoxin on people, however, I personalky would not want to go down that rabbit hole. I furthermore found Denis Rancourt's line of argumentation quite persuasive that the Covid crisis caused people a lot of extra stress, and so mainly people died who are already under severe strain due to physical and mental disaility and due to poverty and old age. They are simply less stress resistent. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/denis-rancourt-militaristic-medicine-excess-deaths-rfk-jr-podcast/ We probably as a society tend to greatly underestimate mental factors when it comes to physical health.
We should also not underestimate the effect of financial incentives. Apparently lots of people in New York and elsewhere were intubated who would have been better treated without intubation. A lot of nurses where questioning why their patients were intubated. They found that their patients would have survived had they not been intubated so vigourously. In UK there has been a debate that they put Covid patients who could have recovered from Covid on end of life treatment which included giving them drugs such as Morphium and too high doses of midazolam, both of which cause respiratory depression which may have actually killed quite a few people in UK (and similar end of life protocols I believe where followed in Sweden where a lot of elderly died in care homes during the first wave).
It seems that certain medical protocols caused more harm than good.
In Italy they also tested Hydroxychloroquine. Accidentally, they sometimes administered far too much (medical mistake) probably leading to heart arrythmyias and death.
Or to the wrong people. What many don't know is that hydroxychloroquine should not be administered to people with G6PD-deficiency (also known as favism) since it can cause severe hemolysis. G6PD-deficiency mostly affects people of mediterranen origin. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2018/rr-2
It is clear that Italians and French used initially a lot of hydroxychloroquine (4000 per cent increase in Italy, https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/studies-highlight-surges-touted-drugs-early-covid-19) which can really lead to heart arrythmyias and heart failure especially when people have heart problems to start with, plus cause the above-mentioned problem in people with G6PD-deficiency.
Altogether there are many different causes for the rise in exessive all cause mortality in certain counties. The fact that some countries had no substantial increase in all cause mortality whereas others had a very substantial increase shows that there are quite specific reasons. In Germany we had actually far less people hospitalized and a lower number of people intubated in 2020 than in 2019, also not a higher number of hospitalizations for severe respiratory diseases. Yet like other countries Germany had their fair share of Covid cases, although some of those clinical Covid cases had a negative PCR test (about two thirds during the first Covid wave and still half during the 2nd wave according to an analysis of the Initiative Qualit├дtsmedizin which drew on data from one third of German hospitals). In Germany, according to the data Analyst, Tom Lausen, being a country with a very high number of ICU beds, hospitals had apparently problems filling those ICU beds when many avoided hospitals due to fear of catching Covid and being intubated, and so they seem to have kept the elderly (and partly dying) people from care homes longer inside the ICU because the hospitals needed the money. One ICU bed can bring 3000 to 5000 Euro per day, and hospitals can simply not afford to leave too many ICU beds empty.
It should also be noted that Wuhan citizens have been criticizing authorities for not doing enough against air pollution. They have several garbage incinerators in Wuhan, partly in close proximity to residential areas that were known to cause a lot of deaths before the Covid crisis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515677/
LOL! I find it amazing that you can still speak, at this point, as though the government and hospitals were playing it straight and actually trying to help, and that you can wade into the churn of phony тАЬdataтАЭ as though it makes sense and come up with statements like тАЬhospitals simply cannot afford to leave too many ICU beds empty.тАЭ The PCR testing is a charade. The sudden disappearance of тАЬinfluenzaтАЭ cases while тАЬcovidтАЭ was breathlessly megaphoned in the mass media was a charade. The hatchet job on Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine and the doctors who tried to proscribe it was a charade to push the phony Emergency Use Authorization for rolling out the injections. The intubation drama was a charade that never needed to happen. It is as though you have agreed to wear a blindfold in a duel while your opponent is swinging a sword. You have agreed to try to dodge the blows by listening for the sword whooshes only. The opponent proceeds to cheat by playing a ghetto-blaster at 90 decibels and you want to appeal to the judges and argue that they should only get to turn it up to 50 to preserve their freedom of speech but still give you a тАЬfair chance.тАЭ Meanwhile, you can hear the judges are taking out life insurance policies you in the background, as well as placing bets with each other on which of your limbs will be severed first.
Well, I still give it a try from time to time to argue logically and coherently. However, you are right that it does not seem to make that much of a difference.
Yes, I know, RFK Jr is a great man, one of the few unafraid.
I agree but if he knew this why did he wait until now to speak about it. It appears as if he is riding on you and Katherine's thunder. I am glad he is talking about it but I find it hard to believe he didn't know about this before or is he breaking this news based on your research? He needs to say that as many others have done. They acknowledge the work of both you and Katherine. If he does not state that he did his own research after your research exposed the DOD and HHS agreement then that means to the public he knew all along but waited for someone else to break the ice.
I'm far less enamored of RFK, Jr. He probably likes, as a litigator, the legal angle.
Perhaps he should pick up Katherine Watt's challenge given all she's uncovered.
The more provable litigation lies in what is already demonstrable and on the record in regards to the hospital protocols.
Why does RFK's team and Bigtree's team avoid this?
A lot of people are under the misconception that RFK and Bigtree are against vaccines. They are not- they stake their ground on wanting "safe vaccines" an oxymoron if ever there was one.
Here's a snippet from a Q&A with RFK:
Q: Rates of childhood infectious diseases have plummeted over the past half-century or so. Are you out to return us to the dark ages?
Kennedy: "I am for vaccines. I have been tracking mercury in fish for 30 years and nobody has called me antifish. I am pro-vaccine. I had all my kids vaccinated. I think vaccines save lives. But we are also seeing an explosion in neurodevelopmental disorders and we ought to be able to do a cost-benefit analysis and see what's causing them. We ought to have robust, transparent science and an independent regulatory agency. Nobody is trying to get rid of vaccines here. I just want safe vaccines."
https://www.science.org/content/article/exclusive-qa-robert-f-kennedy-jr-trumps-proposed-vaccine-commission
Putting anyone on a pedestal is dangerous business.
I agree that all of these injections from the 19th century onward have never been (nor can they be) safe and effective. RFK, Jr is a politician by inclination. You no doubt know the characteristics that embodies. He and Bigtree are speaking poli-speak. Nothing to do with science or certainly not the truth. As of late he's shown disdain regarding those who have researched the matter and come up with a clear verdict: there's no pathogenic virus - EVER. It's the emperor's clothes, and the injection is toxic with all kinds of junk running through the bodies of those who succumbed.
Kennedy has evolved under this massive psy-op as a gatekeeper of sorts. He wants nothing to do with the fact that no pathogenic virus has been found using the premises of the scientific method. The scale of the psy-op is 1,000 fold anything encountered before. Once people grasp what this really is than we can stop playing games about "spike proteins".
Fauci is a front, as are all the regulatory bodies such as FDA, CDC (as we see in Ohio including EPA, in transportation FAA, FCC 5G rollout, etc. etc.).
Operationally this does seem to be a military ops regarding the jab following the likes of the so-called anthrax injection campaign.
The entire system is privately owned and ruled. The president is just an order taker - the Office of the President was captured long ago - the office that has some authority to issue proclamations, executive orders, and oversee military (domestic and foreign).
What an excellent and astute comment. Thank you.
RFK is a very smart and able man and has been working in our defense for a very long time. Look at all his environmental legislation. He spoke out all over europe and elsewhere during the lockdowns putting his life at risk. That's way more than 99 % of us ever did. I am so sick of the attacks on him. He and his cohorts came up with strategies when everyone else could only talk about fleeing the country. He has shown great leadership, courage and intelligence. Most people think they are being courageous by weighing in on the internet. I suggest that there are being out on the street, talking to people in person, organizing etc are far more important and I hope that people will follow RFK's courageous lead.
Every body can't do everything. But every body can do something.
I gave up on saviors a long time ago. His org has garnered millions.
Do you know, for example, that the US has, combined local, state and federal 300,000 laws on the books regarding gun control and yet....
Laws haven't gotten us clean drinking water, soil, air. We have roughly 1,000 rail derailments, some like Ohio's and Detroit's are emitted tons of toxins. What did the EPA do about this?
What RFK, Jr. misses is that it's the system that's the underlying problem not more laws or regulations. The entire system and its institutions are thoroughly captured and corrupted.
Just out of curiosity, what does Ms Latypova say about there being "no pathogenic virus -- EVER"?
In this interview Jess is clearly and unequivocally a virus skeptic - to put it mildly. Sasha will have to speak directly to this. She seems to lean in that direction, but as I've has some back and forth with her, she seems the jab manufacturing process along with Katherine Watt's legal findings seem to be her focus. (I get the sense she's coy about this. Perhaps she doesn't want to "burn bridges???)
Personally, I agree with Jess and those who claim there's no scientific proof of a pathogenic virus. The "spike protein" was manufactured in a computer along with the assemblage of a "virus".
I would say that this combined with a catalog of specimens (again never proven to come from nature) were used to provide the basis of the scam, and used in some fashion to create the jab formula. Like Sasha I do think the manufacturing of these billions of vials are highly contaminated and lack sufficient quality checks (based on DARPA specs). So the shots can cause all kinds of bad effects (including death) depending on the roll of the dice.
I saw a cartoon of a couple of guys in white coats. One has a manic expression of excited discovery on his face, the other looks quizzical. They are standing in front of a blackboard that has two furious storms of mathematical symbols which resolve at the bottom with a triumphal, underlined =0!! Between the two dense paragraphs of math there is a little phrase in parentheses that says: (then a miracle occurs...) The unconvinced one is pointing at it and saying, тАЬUhhh, can you go into a little more detail explaining what happens between step one and step two?тАЭ
Cowan, Kaufman, and Lanka have performed great service in helping the lay person understand their challenges to тАЬvirologyтАЭ but Dr. Sam Bailey breaks it down really well also. The problem as I see it now is that there are some black boxes labeled тАЬthen a miracle occursтАЭ that are being accepted by some practitioners in the field as solid indications of causality between steps and they are not. The black boxes are hidden in the jargon that is bandied about by the тАЬexpertsтАЭ unquestioningly, giving each other dispensations from the rigors of actual scientific inquiry, probably because they are getting paid anyway for research based on presumptions that are not true... But hey, who is to say that in an eleven-dimensional realm, a train built of playing cards that gets derailed CANтАЩT just bounce back on the tracks and continue and score a touchdown, in silico?
E=MC squared.
Discerning smoke and mirrors from reality. Some of it is the rigorous use logic/reason and some is sensibility.
I think the "nuclear" bombs said to have hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki was really the white coats attempt to claim a victory when they couldn't perfect such a bomb in the lab or field, and so staged events which were than perpetrated on Japan. The threat was thus born and sustained to this day.
Virology is just an example of what happens when failure cannot be admitted, and when funding requires it be covered up for other purposes. (I suspect science's inquiry has led us down strange cul de sacs. (The nefarious Nobel Prize awards are complicit.)
Who said the following? In what setting and on what date?
Bonus points for providing context.
"Okay, so let me push back on you.
Yeah. You know, I think most people are going to recommend here, which is that the reason that you had these huge number of deaths in Paris and New York and for example, in northern Italy, which you did not mention in Tuscany, the same time as earlier, actually, than the spikes that I was mentioning.
I'd love to hear your explanation for that. Because that seemed to be I mean, that's where we all got the idea that this virus was galloping through and killing lots and lots of people. And they didn't have remdesivir in Italy at that time, so oh, something was killing people.
And couldn't it be that the virus landed in those places, you know, it lands in big cities, it spreads in big cities much more quickly, because there's denser populations. And of course, there's 35 states that just don't have dense populations where the virus didn't reach or infect large groups of people for a long period of time."
Part of the reason for people dying were certain protocols that were followed in those countries: Intubate them while the oxygen saturation is still around 90 or above. Due to protocol early intubation was to protect the doctors and nurses at a time when the viral load of that allegedly highly lethal pathogen was allegedly lower. This is all nonsense. In Germany lung doctors saw that that protocol that was applied in Italy was an overreaction, and decided that this was nonsense, and so they did not intubate those people and instead would just give patients oxygen as they had previously done with respiratory diseases. Also in Northern Italy, Lombardy, they have a huge asbestos problem from occupational asbestos exposure in 1960s and 1970s. By the way: a lot of asbestos was also used in the ship manufacturing in New York, New Orleans. And France also has that occupational asbestos exposure particularly of males. There is a study that predicts a rise of malignant mesothelioma (MM) in Lombardy until approx 2019. "This study documented a high burden of MM in both genders in the Lombardy Region, reflecting extensive occupational (mainly in men) and non-occupational (mainly in women) exposure to asbestos in the past. Incidence rates are still increasing; a downturn in occurrence of MM is expected to occur after 2019."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27312399/
There is furthermore a Harvard study that there is a clear link between long-term exposure to PM2.5 particles (for example from garbage incinerators, air pollution in general) and Covid-19 deaths.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/air-pollution-linked-with-higher-covid-19-death-rates/
This causal connection between air pollution and dying of respiratory diseases has been known for decades.
I doubt whether Sasha Latypova's observation that there must be an extra neurotoxin exposure of some sort that would cause loss of smell and taste is correct. As some physicians have pointed out respiratory diseases such as flu also cause loss of smell and taste. Plus it is known that anxiety can have a similar effect on your nervous system, i.e. loss of smell and taste. Plus nocebo effect is also at work here. Tell people again and again on TV and newspapers over several months continiously that Covid goes along not only with common cold symptons such as cough, fever, runny nose, diarrea but also with loss of taste and smell, and a lot more people will report a loss of smell and taste. I know people who in the absence of a positive PCR test, and even in the presence of a negative PCR test claim that they must have had Covid since they lost their smell and taste. I realize that the latter observation could in fact support Sasha's hypothesis that the government sprayed some unknown neurotoxin on people, however, I personalky would not want to go down that rabbit hole. I furthermore found Denis Rancourt's line of argumentation quite persuasive that the Covid crisis caused people a lot of extra stress, and so mainly people died who are already under severe strain due to physical and mental disaility and due to poverty and old age. They are simply less stress resistent. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/denis-rancourt-militaristic-medicine-excess-deaths-rfk-jr-podcast/ We probably as a society tend to greatly underestimate mental factors when it comes to physical health.
We should also not underestimate the effect of financial incentives. Apparently lots of people in New York and elsewhere were intubated who would have been better treated without intubation. A lot of nurses where questioning why their patients were intubated. They found that their patients would have survived had they not been intubated so vigourously. In UK there has been a debate that they put Covid patients who could have recovered from Covid on end of life treatment which included giving them drugs such as Morphium and too high doses of midazolam, both of which cause respiratory depression which may have actually killed quite a few people in UK (and similar end of life protocols I believe where followed in Sweden where a lot of elderly died in care homes during the first wave).
https://youtu.be/GEwktv-AGEw
It seems that certain medical protocols caused more harm than good.
In Italy they also tested Hydroxychloroquine. Accidentally, they sometimes administered far too much (medical mistake) probably leading to heart arrythmyias and death.
Or to the wrong people. What many don't know is that hydroxychloroquine should not be administered to people with G6PD-deficiency (also known as favism) since it can cause severe hemolysis. G6PD-deficiency mostly affects people of mediterranen origin. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2018/rr-2
It is clear that Italians and French used initially a lot of hydroxychloroquine (4000 per cent increase in Italy, https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/studies-highlight-surges-touted-drugs-early-covid-19) which can really lead to heart arrythmyias and heart failure especially when people have heart problems to start with, plus cause the above-mentioned problem in people with G6PD-deficiency.
Altogether there are many different causes for the rise in exessive all cause mortality in certain counties. The fact that some countries had no substantial increase in all cause mortality whereas others had a very substantial increase shows that there are quite specific reasons. In Germany we had actually far less people hospitalized and a lower number of people intubated in 2020 than in 2019, also not a higher number of hospitalizations for severe respiratory diseases. Yet like other countries Germany had their fair share of Covid cases, although some of those clinical Covid cases had a negative PCR test (about two thirds during the first Covid wave and still half during the 2nd wave according to an analysis of the Initiative Qualit├дtsmedizin which drew on data from one third of German hospitals). In Germany, according to the data Analyst, Tom Lausen, being a country with a very high number of ICU beds, hospitals had apparently problems filling those ICU beds when many avoided hospitals due to fear of catching Covid and being intubated, and so they seem to have kept the elderly (and partly dying) people from care homes longer inside the ICU because the hospitals needed the money. One ICU bed can bring 3000 to 5000 Euro per day, and hospitals can simply not afford to leave too many ICU beds empty.
It should also be noted that Wuhan citizens have been criticizing authorities for not doing enough against air pollution. They have several garbage incinerators in Wuhan, partly in close proximity to residential areas that were known to cause a lot of deaths before the Covid crisis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515677/
LOL! I find it amazing that you can still speak, at this point, as though the government and hospitals were playing it straight and actually trying to help, and that you can wade into the churn of phony тАЬdataтАЭ as though it makes sense and come up with statements like тАЬhospitals simply cannot afford to leave too many ICU beds empty.тАЭ The PCR testing is a charade. The sudden disappearance of тАЬinfluenzaтАЭ cases while тАЬcovidтАЭ was breathlessly megaphoned in the mass media was a charade. The hatchet job on Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine and the doctors who tried to proscribe it was a charade to push the phony Emergency Use Authorization for rolling out the injections. The intubation drama was a charade that never needed to happen. It is as though you have agreed to wear a blindfold in a duel while your opponent is swinging a sword. You have agreed to try to dodge the blows by listening for the sword whooshes only. The opponent proceeds to cheat by playing a ghetto-blaster at 90 decibels and you want to appeal to the judges and argue that they should only get to turn it up to 50 to preserve their freedom of speech but still give you a тАЬfair chance.тАЭ Meanwhile, you can hear the judges are taking out life insurance policies you in the background, as well as placing bets with each other on which of your limbs will be severed first.
Well, I still give it a try from time to time to argue logically and coherently. However, you are right that it does not seem to make that much of a difference.