158 Comments

"The viral genome was a computer model obtained from 1 patient in China. The PCR is not diagnostic and remains unvalidated to date."

----

I'm thinking they already had the sequence because they...CREATED IT. 😅

Expand full comment

Did you post my comment in the thread on chbmp. That would help people in real time get connected with documentation and lawsuits.

I'm still not able to post in the comments section it appears.

Expand full comment

You should be able to comment, Allen. *edit: Try now.

Expand full comment

I'll just post that same comment in that thread.

Expand full comment

I think that unless the CDC knowingly printed lies on their website that the CDC also isolated a SARS-CoV2 genome from a US patient displaying symptoms of Covid19. They passaged viral soups collected from the nose of that patient in animal cells in culture, harvested virus and sequenced it. Then they repeated the passage in animal cells eight more times, each time resequencing the isolated virus.

They printed on their website that the sequence of the virus did not change during the eight passages through animal cells and was pretty much identical to the Chinese genome sequence.

I'm not saying the CDC work was correct, I'm just pointing out what was stated by a dedicated professional scientific/biomedical organisation on their website.

People need to get over this notion that the 'SARSCoV2' sequence was just a computer generated model. It wasn't. Unless multiple organisations the world over knowingly committed biomedical fraud in saying that they had sequenced genomes from novel clinical isolates.

Expand full comment

" viral soups " Does not a purified or isolated sars cov2 virus make. The CDC never had a sample of an isolated and purified sample of sars cov 2, not on July 13 2020 or in Dec 7 2020 they cultured some mucus in cells in vitro.

The jabs were rolled out by the military and Dod in Dec 14 2020. And rRT-PCR is not a test, it’s DNA amplification tool.

“... Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the ThemoFisher Scientific TaqPathTM 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied BiosystemsTM 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real- Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use."

Page 39

CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 07/13/2020

" I'm just pointing out what was stated by a dedicated professional scientific/biomedical organisation on their website."

Maybe it’s you who needs to get over the notion that the CDC is a dedicated professional scientific organization simply because the government gave it a gov. address.

" Unless multiple organisations the world over knowingly committed biomedical fraud"

That's exactly what they did as they are all on the same lock step page, not only in the last 3 yrs but since the 1980s.

Expand full comment

"a US patient displaying symptoms of Covid19. " Per The Cochrane Institute and world health agencies, such as the ones who talked to ABC News, "Covid19" has no symptoms, can only be distinguished via tests such as the PCR and antigen tests. We know how accurate they are under the best of circumstances, let alone when no genome is present to prime them. And you are assuming the viral provenance of anything collected from that patient, or any material "harvested" from that cell culture poison brew (patient extract, monkey kidney cell tissues, bovine fetal serum, antibiotics, which are toxic to the kidney cells).

Cochrane Institute,

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013665/full?highlightAbstract=covid%7Cdiagnos%7C19%7Cdiagnosis%7Cdiagnosi%7Cdiagnoses

ABC account available here,

https://viroliegy.com/2023/01/18/respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv/ .

You are deliberately confounding "sequencing," which requires starting with a genome whose provenance is known, and breaking it down, vs "assembling," which aims to create a genome out of billions of short segments of nucleic acid, none known for sure to be viral, with the combinations not proven to even come from the same entity.. And then picking the combo which most likely resembles... the result of another assembly process.

You would do well at the CDC.

Expand full comment

The CDC lies. There is no question of that. It has been a series of their lies that we have had to endure. Walensky is not dumb, she just likes to control us with lies.

Expand full comment

"The PhDs bought food and paid rent. Some mice were sacrificed. The end. "🤣🤣🤣

Also, love today's art!

Expand full comment

THat was a brilliant observation. And funny because it is true.

Expand full comment

It's not only true, it generalizes very well.

Science, and especially pharma-funded medical/bioscience, is an embarrassing mess.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

Expand full comment

"illness clusters self-extinguish every time." Mike Yeadon observed this also. great minds...

Expand full comment

Great analysis, Sasha. I've been writing about monkey business with SARS-CoV on my substack. It looks like all of the aerosolized SARS-CoV work was done in the dark back in the day. I believe there is something important about aerosolized SARS-CoV and/or aerosolized vaccines we are not being told about.

Also, slightly OT but important - my latest article details the history of a company called Nanotherapeutics that was involved with what appears to be the laundering of a vaccine manufacturing facility in the Czech Republic using DoD funds starting back around 2014. The middleman was a Gates Foundation bigwig. The final recipient was Novavax who received DoD funds for covid vaccines.

https://entropywave.substack.com/p/peering-into-the-nanocosm

Expand full comment

I wish I could disagree with Sasha's post today...with regards to the Academic-Government complex as a welfare program for scientists. There are very few labs that are able to produce high quality, relevant work these days. Now, most of the research that is done in bio-medicine/bio-physics is there to support the current paradigm and propaganda.

The very few scientists that are expanding (or expanded) the field of biology & medicine are sidelined, ridiculed and cut out of the research funding at NIH/NSF/HHMI and other large granting institutions.

Fantastic breakdown of the mouse and rhesus monkey studies. Short, sweet and to the point!

Expand full comment

"We were told by Dr. Walker on a date that Pfizer is mutating viruses in the lab..."

I laughed at this- you seem to have a dry wit. That opening sentence sounds like it could have come from an updated Kafka scenario.

I call crap on the foundationsal premises of all these experiments on caged monkeys. Beyond the various "controlled substances" they are injected with the very fact that they are forced into environments which produce all manner of anxiety disorders and the subsequent biological dysfunction renders all of these experiments dubious at best.

How about we do a "viral spread" experiment in the wild- maybe "aerosolized?"

It's all so absurd.

Expand full comment

Walker thinks with one part of his ego. Not a well rounded individual 🤣

Expand full comment

I'm less concerned w/Walker and the Pharma quislings than with how broad and vocal segments of "Team Reality" are catapulting the very thing that is roundly questioned by what Sasha has posted here for example and soundly refuted by the mountains of evidence produced by Rancourt and Hockett and many others including myself.

I will risk naming names here despite knowing many shy away from this and rationalize away the reasons these "Covid oppositional celebrities" are above being challenged. Just that thinking alone is very dangerous.

The absurditites of "lab leak" and the many ever evolving iterations of this "theory" as a cause for "the pandemic" are to date consistently pushed by RFK, Malone, Kirsch, Rose, Bhattacharya, Kulldorff, Bigtree, Cole and many others who possess the largest audience and biggest megaphones.

I will say it again they are flat wrong AND are covering up the crimes of what happened in the hospitals and nursing homes as they proliferate this demonstrably absurd lie that there was a pandemic caused by unique viral pathogen spread.

I don't care who they are, I don't care what their motives, I don't care who thinks they are unassailable they need to be called to task on this repeatedly.

They are causing damage in the immediate and knowingly or not legitimizing the pandemic narrative and the Biosecurity State.

We are three years into this- there is no excuse at this point.

Expand full comment

Me toooo Allen… with you 100% … that’s what makes it worse for me . Different motives with different personalities/ celebrities and their intentions. Watch out for shiny objects no matter what camp they’re in . Discernment goes along way.

Expand full comment

AGREE!!! Most named by Allen are very specific researchers with very narrow perspectives within their industry. They are upset that their reputations, jobs, futures have been deeply affected due to not fitting the "Science" narrative re: the virus/jab. I get it - but their analysis has to be viewed in that way. The only one who has occasionally stepped out of it is Malone who did work with DARPA, but like most of those sited has their "disagreements" with others in their industry. Yikes!!!

The most obvious take away for me after these three years is they are totally fine with experimenting on people to retain power and control. Whether its a meta body like WHO or a govt like mine here in Canada they, like empires crumbling- US, see the downside of their power and are desperate to find new niches to keep their grift going.

Pluto in Aquarius baby-- first time in 250 years (March 7th), for 20 years. Truly the dawning of the Age of Aquarius. As above, so below 😊The old structures are collapsing, old paradigms of authority and trust and we are heading into a much more collaborative world-- in all areas. Beautiful ✨

Expand full comment

Didn’t know this information. I thought mutating viruses and testing in other species would be dangerous. Thanks for the article! I laughed when I read the section on PhDs needing to eat so they got a grant. 😂 I’ve lived that! 😉

Expand full comment

That scene in Ghostbusters when Bill Murray and the other researcher are getting canned after a fraud ESP “experiment” they are using as a pretext to flirt with attractive female subjects...They are panicking and asking each other, “What are we going to do now?” One says “ Well, we could go get jobs in the real world maybe?” The other one reacts with terror--“Oh No! We can’t do THAT! I’ve been there! They expect RESULTS!”

Expand full comment

Perfect illustration! Thanks!!

Expand full comment

Every mutation brings a weaker version

Expand full comment

Its easy to want to believe the mutation story, but actual Science says things don't work that way. It is also easy to want to believe that Evil Schmucks, like Pfizer, would like to make a problem for which they could sell a solution and make profit. Yes, we hate shit like this, but it isn't reality.

I think what had me convinced of the idea of using animals to do gain-of-function was my (perhaps flawed) understanding of plant biology and how strains of plants are developed using selective breeding. Trouble is that viruses move toward less lethal each time, so the comparison isn't really valid.

Lovely art work. Thank you for sharing!

Expand full comment

Apparently there was no real need to understand viruses, only how to manipulate the public. At this point, the “vaccine” is a higher risk than the pseudo virus ever was.

Expand full comment

Excellent. So many gems in this article I hardly know where to start. Let's see . . .animal to animal transmission in laboratories always fails . . . because . . . a billion years of evolution has produced powerful immune systems in animals that lab-modified viruses can't defeat. And . . . the quacks applying for government grants to develop weaponized viruses had to kill the mice themselves to achieve their desired result, and are basically committing fraud. And . . . the PCR tests are less than useless. All of this sounds perfectly plausible to me. Ha ha, DARPA clowns; mother nature wins again!

Expand full comment

The paper recently released with Dr Fauci's name on it really put the icing on the vaccine fraud. It admits there are no effective vaccines for any respiratory viruses. Therefore the motive behind vaccine mandates has nothing to do with public health. Natural immunity is the only reason we are alive. If you want to kill people it is so much easier to inject the poison right past the body's defenses.

Expand full comment

Taubenberger is named too which I didn't realize at first.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Feb 10, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Ironic...

Expand full comment

And the hygiene issues.

Expand full comment

Sounds like there is no such thing as virus, at least not in the way textbooks describe it.

Expand full comment

Yes exactly. What role does intention/mental, fear/emotional and weakening the immune system /stress/nutrition play in creating disease? Yes there are serious and many jab injuries-- but what are they due to ?-- Clue look at the major areas of impact--nervous system, heart/blood and reproductive. The fact the jab ingredients are so varied and hard to pin down is also a big clue.

Expand full comment

..."we only have Pfizer’s word for it"...if that doesn't scare the be-jabbers out of you, what will? I wonder if pfizer did this monkey-business research in-house or farmed it out to one of their flunky research partners?

If I were a mouse, I'd be honored to give up my life so that some flunkster with a PhD could eat and pay rent. These clowns have never proved how transmission works with any viruses, not even a simple cold rhino-virus.

I agree, lab leaks are extremely baseless as to the possibility of them causing monstrous deadly viruses roaming the planet. If something very deadly, virus or otherwise manged to be emitted from a lab, millions would be dead before the CDC could even invent a name for it. There would be NO vaccine or otherwise ready to fight it for months. They could never predict what a virus might do in the wilds and even their computer algorithms are invented by A/I...the least intelligent source of knowledge on the planet.

Expand full comment

Bats are claimed to have extraordinary immune systems, virtually protecting them from all viruses. Yet the same people who have found this out, also claim we need to 'vaccinate' wild bats in order to protect humans from viruses that don't infect them 👀

Expand full comment

Love the painting today! … luckily I already have another one of yours coming my way soon.

Great post, proper science is indeed hard but not what these ‘virologists’ pass of for it

Expand full comment

Yep, gain of fiction is just that...

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/gain-of-function-gaslighting:8

Here's a great article that goes through the papers like you do here. I highly recommend the other articles too, there's a lot of hype around genetics etc.

https://viroliegy.com/2022/04/07/gain-of-fiction/

And guess what, a new "test" to cover up the same things as the vax side effects! Lol

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/meet-vexas

Expand full comment

Need to give the viral isolation hoax a careful re-examination. Thanks for Dr. Bailey.

Expand full comment