Who are "they"? I always like to know who is making such claims. Since there is no evidence of the "pathogenic virus" (SARS-CoV-2), how is it possible that a spike protein could be created from "it" (even a facsimile)?
Who are "they"? I always like to know who is making such claims. Since there is no evidence of the "pathogenic virus" (SARS-CoV-2), how is it possible that a spike protein could be created from "it" (even a facsimile)?
Art Costa, I’m not sure. Karen Kingston believes that the graphene molecule in the hydrogel/PEG is actually the spike. She feels they lied to us about the mRNA narrative. If she’s right, I guess that would be good news bcuz then, that should mean it doesn’t change one’s DNA (altho that one study about the liver cells proved it does in fact get taken up by the genome, so ?? 🤷🏼♀️)...however, it would still be bad news, as then the graphene molecule (being a spike) would still need to be detoxed from the body. Does anyone really know the absolute truth??
Art Costa, I hope you’re right, because my 20 year old son foolishly took two jabs! I will watch & read your link. But I’m wondering though, why are they finding in autopsies people that have so much spike in them & that the spike has lasted for many months after? It is a worry.
No, I don't think so either. From what I've read so far, these mRNA gene therapy treatments done to try to rid cancer cost millions of $ and are very fragile too, meaning not suitable at all to be made in bulk. As they are EUA, the "secret ingredients" can remain so to protect manufacturer. Adam Curtis made some short films which are on BBC iplayer about how too much information, both true and untrue, from sublime to ridiculous, was projected on to Russian population to completely undermine any possibility of discerning facts. Not just Russan gov either! I think this is their MO right now.
After learning how supposedly esteemed medical journals go about their business, it is difficult to believe studies whether peer reviewed or not. Can they not use the ones generated in their computer genebank?
I've raised the issue that most (all) of science, specifically life sciences, are based on hypotheses, claims, and fewer are actually theories that have followed some degree of verification through independent variables and control procedures and independent reproduced results.
As you note we have little to go by since so much because dogma and the above method is, particularly in "virology" not used at all. Much of it is funded by pharma and DARPA/government grants. The academy is soaked in such funding.
Regarding "gene theory" and DNA, I suggest a reading of the critical review that takes you from early conceptualization to the present, raises important questions, followed by a conclusion. A critical review should be assigned to every theory which has been floated a "fact" or "proven" when in fact it has not.
Who are "they"? I always like to know who is making such claims. Since there is no evidence of the "pathogenic virus" (SARS-CoV-2), how is it possible that a spike protein could be created from "it" (even a facsimile)?
Art Costa, I’m not sure. Karen Kingston believes that the graphene molecule in the hydrogel/PEG is actually the spike. She feels they lied to us about the mRNA narrative. If she’s right, I guess that would be good news bcuz then, that should mean it doesn’t change one’s DNA (altho that one study about the liver cells proved it does in fact get taken up by the genome, so ?? 🤷🏼♀️)...however, it would still be bad news, as then the graphene molecule (being a spike) would still need to be detoxed from the body. Does anyone really know the absolute truth??
Monica M whether it's graphene oxide or some other toxin, I think it's becoming clearer that they cannot penetrate cells.
You may want to watch and read this from Dr. Stefano Scoglio:
https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/
Art Costa, I hope you’re right, because my 20 year old son foolishly took two jabs! I will watch & read your link. But I’m wondering though, why are they finding in autopsies people that have so much spike in them & that the spike has lasted for many months after? It is a worry.
No, I don't think so either. From what I've read so far, these mRNA gene therapy treatments done to try to rid cancer cost millions of $ and are very fragile too, meaning not suitable at all to be made in bulk. As they are EUA, the "secret ingredients" can remain so to protect manufacturer. Adam Curtis made some short films which are on BBC iplayer about how too much information, both true and untrue, from sublime to ridiculous, was projected on to Russian population to completely undermine any possibility of discerning facts. Not just Russan gov either! I think this is their MO right now.
After learning how supposedly esteemed medical journals go about their business, it is difficult to believe studies whether peer reviewed or not. Can they not use the ones generated in their computer genebank?
I've raised the issue that most (all) of science, specifically life sciences, are based on hypotheses, claims, and fewer are actually theories that have followed some degree of verification through independent variables and control procedures and independent reproduced results.
As you note we have little to go by since so much because dogma and the above method is, particularly in "virology" not used at all. Much of it is funded by pharma and DARPA/government grants. The academy is soaked in such funding.
Regarding "gene theory" and DNA, I suggest a reading of the critical review that takes you from early conceptualization to the present, raises important questions, followed by a conclusion. A critical review should be assigned to every theory which has been floated a "fact" or "proven" when in fact it has not.
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/