277 Comments

First of all - were you always this funny? Great read and your passion, Sasha comes through along with your intelligence. Thank you for that clear, bright essay.

"Don’t fall for doom cults and their false narratives. When we are not afraid to seek the truth we cannot be captured, controlled or enslaved. Once you understand this, you see Harari as not a powerful technocrat, but what he really is - a clown with a whiny voice, spinning idiotic narratives for his masters. They already failed anyway, because you know the truth."

Bingo!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Idk, about funny, but these garbage spinners inspire deep contempt in me.

Expand full comment

and laughing at them defangs them and the fear they try to create!

Expand full comment

They would certainly be funny if they were not insane and ruthless :)

Expand full comment

Me too!!!!

Expand full comment

Brilliant -cuts right to the heart of the matter. Thank you Sasha for all the hope and truth.

Expand full comment

Completely agree!

Expand full comment

The subtitle "Visualize doom. Harder." made me laugh too.

But this part brought tears to my eyes:

"You may believe in billions of years of evolution, but my preferred explanation is that God’s design is perfect, and thus cannot be improved upon. All life forms, from humans to microorganisms, are in the state of perfect dynamic equilibrium for this moment in time, as dictated by physical laws."

(Almost as beautifully put as the painting of A Rose... but I have to say the Rose wins!)

Expand full comment

After spending far too much time consuming Harari clips for my “Anatomy of a Philanthropath” series, I have to agree with your assessment of him as “a clown with a whiny voice” (😆), Sasha.

For those who want more evidence of his menacing and self-contradictory postulations, I collected some of his most notorious quotes in Parts 2 and 3 of that series:

• “Part 2: Downloadable Digital Dictatorships” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-947)

• “Part 3: Yuval Noah Harari: Not the Man We Think He Is?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-3fd)

Expand full comment

I keep reminding folks that Russel Brand and Harari are all good with each other. So I think it's sad/funny how many folks are all good with Brand and rooting for him. Brand is a shreiker, but does he help resistance or is he controlling it? Whats your take? I can't stand to look at either.

Expand full comment

funny. I too have a problem with Brand, I just can't bear watching him, the way he drones on and on and on and on when "asking a question". It's like he's showing off, look at how smart I am, look at all these fancy words I use, look at how I can make a sentence/question longer than you've ever seen one before! Ugh!

Expand full comment

It's in the hand gestures!

Expand full comment

Theoretical physicists call that 'hand waving.' Magicians and hypnotists also use the technique.

Expand full comment

that too!!

Expand full comment

... and the tense, high pitch of his voice and how he speaks way too fast and without any pauses.

Expand full comment

That is a perfect description of my feelings when I listen to him. Good for you! But I have to say, like many of you it seems, we keep returning or checking on him every now and then. He sure did great on Bill Maher’s show getting his point across against the MSNBC journalist triggering lots of applauds from the audience on very touchy and important issues.

Check it out:

https://youtu.be/tr93G421RIk

He’s definitely got a good mind, is very passionate and seems to want to serve Truth and Justice. I was surprised to find out he has been a Free Mason at one point. Anybody ever heard him talk about it?

Expand full comment

Good question, jacquelyn, and I honestly don’t know. I sense that Brand is sincere and sincerely passionate about resisting tyranny, nurturing cross-partisan dialogue, and exposing corruption. I agree there are aspects of his personality that can be grating, but I also feel he is giving voice to significant issues and contributing to the gradual awakening of the masses.

His friendship with Harari is perplexing, although as I wrote in Part 3 of my series, many of Harari’s quotes have been taken out of context to imply he is advocating rather than warning against the totalitarianism possible within a biosurveillance state. I think Harari is extraordinarily naïve in that he thinks we can harness the power of institutions to prevent such a dystopian nightmare from unfolding, and there is no question that his admonitions are being followed like a roadmap by Schwab, et al.

Expand full comment

I've done several videos on Russell Brand's interview of Harari, since my YT channel started out as a response to Russell's interviews. Russell is consistent in separating the person from the ideas. He always loves the person and challenges their ideas. I personally wonder if Harari has done us a favor, wittingly or not. If we were talking about the WEF seeing us as useless eaters to be fed drugs and video games, they'd call us crazy. But since Harari is THEIR ideologue, we can simply quote him. I also find that many of his ideas are sound, but have been twisted for a different purpose. For instance, that nations are spells cast by legal shaman. That's a useful idea for challenging territorial legacies bought by blood and deception. He also says that money is the most successful religion, and makes some surprising confessions about Israel in the last episode. Some of these are video only, before I did Substack: Legal Shamans vs. Economic Witches: https://youtu.be/Fz_6iAngaLA

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/yuval-harari-and-the-metawealth-miniverse

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/polarization-on-esther-perel-and yuval harari

Expand full comment

The Globalists cult that we face off against today, were able to construct a fiction called hierarchy. They placed themselves at the top of that totem pole. They retained a sense of control by becoming the self appointed arbiters of "God" and "Money," by becoming owners of the religious industrial complexes of the past, and owners of the banking industrial complex of each country.

Legal shamans: government is mind control. Govern equals control / Ment equals mind.

Expand full comment

Oooh, as an etymology freak, I don't know how I missed that one. 'Ment' of course comes from mind, mental, mentality. And you and I have already talked about hierarchy as the inheritance order of the archons, rulers in Greek, which I talk about extensively in my book. Great connection here between the arbiters of God and Money.

Expand full comment

Yes, I think we tend to agree, I watched your YouTube presentations. You are spot on.

The whole picture of this global hierarchical structure has massive dimensions. I find it useful to zoom out as far as necessary to see everything. Its impossible to contain everything in just a few articles to describe it.

Expand full comment

Hierarchy is a natural law; the Luciferian Global Elite placed themselves high in a social construct.

Expand full comment

Individualized Sovereignty is the ruling natural law, imposition of control against individuals is a construct of superiority. It is not natural. This imposition is what developed into hierarchy over time.

So if someone like Jacob de Rothschild or someone else with billions of dollars thinks he is king, what's to stop me from claiming kingship? I've never understood why anyone gets off on power over other people. Everyone is equally sovereign, nobody is above you and nobody is below you either.

We are all kings of our own lives and destiny. Hierarchy is the fake method of fooling people to do your bidding. After a while, it all falls apart. Globalism will fall into the lake one fine day, I hope it happens soon.

The Globalists have built a tower of control; it's time to pull some stones from under it and watch it fall.

Expand full comment

Let's look at this: Hierarchy of Law

For Aquinas, human laws are derived from natural law which is a participation in the eternal law.[16] Therefore, eternal law is at the top, followed by natural law, and then human law. Divine law is the revealed law of God to man, while natural law is the imprint of eternal law on the hearts of men[17].

https://medium.com/@teresalee_94155/what-is-the-eternal-law-divine-law-natural-law-and-human-law-d04313acf742

Expand full comment

It's a pleasure to read and replay to you comments, Nefahotep (nice!). What if a word hierarchy is replaced by a sequence?

The Rothschilds (aka Redshilds), Ashkenazi Jewish family, took control over banking. They are Daemons' possessed. We have a plague of such entities. Psychopaths strive for power/control. They see the World through their psych-glasses and have their set of beliefs.

Globalists will turn into ashes, as soon as people return to the nature and free themselves from the slumber.

Let's talk Elon Musk, hmm?

Expand full comment

I have watched Russell Brand for quite some time now, and I must say I admire his views and opinions- combined with his openness and love for humanity. I believe he is fighting for personal freedom in all aspects. I love the way he can combine serious stuff with humour. But taste differs 😊

Expand full comment

yes, I do like what he's doing, I just find him just hard to watch. I tend to get irritated at interviewers who ask a question and then continue talking and talking, and often even answering the question by elucidating the various things that could be the answer! It's like they ask the question, but instead of letting them answer, they give the possible answers, turning the question into multiple choice. At that point, the interviewee could just say "option B". I wish they would do that every time! Maybe the interviewer would eventually get the message that if they want the interviewee to talk, they need to let her/him talk!

Expand full comment

Brand is a master of the art of persuasion. The same techniques are used by politicians, magicians and used car salesmen. Once you recognize them, you tend to build immunity. Brand is more about building his brand (pardon the pun) than actually doing anything of significance, much less personal risk.

I always look at the money side when it comes to these 'people of the people' types. Stressful times create a ready audience for their schtick, which is what Sasha is trying to point out. I also look at whether I'm getting anything new from them, or if they're just repackaging already known information.

I recently dropped a fairly high profile figure in the vaccine debate for this very reason. I estimate she's making over $10K a month just from regurgitating other people's research. I'm sure she thinks she's doing yeoman's work, and maybe she is, but what happens to the easy money when this is over?

It's the same problem as with drug research. Who invests billions of dollars in a drug that essentially puts them out of business? That's the paradox of all drug research. Better to focus on chronic illness that by definition can't be cured and leave the curable diseases to someone with less financial acumen.

Expand full comment

I understand. And he is talking extremely fast, in the beginning I was hardly able to follow him.. 😊

Expand full comment

Yes, I used to change the playback speed just to keep up with his utterances. I don't watch him at all anymore, now. Can't bear the guy.

Expand full comment

I urge you to review his interviews with Harari over the years (there are many) and also this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3tgjHtml4M and get back to me, Sunshine.

Expand full comment

I've watched him a few times, got turned off after seeing how "nice" he was with Harari. People who are fooled are the ones that get picked clean.

Expand full comment

Oh I didn't realise they were pals. But Russell now openly criticises WEF. Did he change his mind?

He would interview odd people from time to time.

Expand full comment

If I were only friendly with people with whom I agree, I'd be pretty lonely. I just watched a clip of Russell on Bill Maher: https://youtu.be/0A0dOUC149M. It's not surprising to me that he's being taken down for having interviewed Harari. He tends to be most effusive with people with whom he disagrees. I've never seen any evidence they have any contact other than on camera.

Expand full comment

I wonder what Russell would act like if he interviewed Harari now.

(I am not a devoted fan of Russell. I only take whatever I need to take from him .)

Expand full comment

My guess is that he'd be no different. I've listened to over 100 of his long-form conversations on Luminary and he's never adversarial. In the Bill Maher video I linked above, he's absolutely relentless in hammering home his points about MSNBC vs Fox. But he never attacks their journalist. And this is how The Daily Beast presents him:

"A clip of a histrionic Russell Brand on Real Time with Bill Maher went viral on Saturday—in which the comedian, who owns multiple multi-million-dollar homes, accused political analyst and fellow guest John Heilemann of hypocrisy for criticizing Fox News from “within the castle of MSNBC.”

"In the two-minute clip, a shouting Brand maintained that MSNBC was fundamentally no different from Fox News. All this, he loudly insisted, contrasts with the “real journalism” of National Security Agency consultant-turned-Russian defector Edward Snowden and former RT host Julian Assange.

"Pressed to provide evidence that MSNBC had ever engaged in comparable practices to Fox hosts’ amplification of election fraud conspiracies they knew to be false, Brand decried the liberal network’s “ludicrous, outrageous” treatment of podcaster Joe Rogan’s promotion of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.

“Deliberately referring to it as a horse medicine when they know it is an effective medicine,” said Brand.

"Studies have repeatedly shown that ivermectin, which can treat parasite infestations in humans and animals, is not an effective treatment for COVID-19. Brand also ignored that even enthusiasts for this off-label and medically discouraged use of the drug refer to it as “horse paste” and have openly celebrated its equine applications."

Is that a traitor?

Expand full comment

He is an actor.

Expand full comment

Apparently the journalists in the MSM sign actor contracts.

Low bar that one.

Expand full comment

Personally I believe we should love everyone. With affection. With kindness. With jokes. With wit.

If you want to convince me that Russell Brand is a psyops, tell me what he's said, not who he loves.

Expand full comment

If you can bear to watch his interviews with Harari, all on youtube, and still love him, let me know. Maybe your definition of love is a bit different than mine, mine involves trust.

Expand full comment

I was just reading Glenn Greenwald about the Left abandoning Brand, and maybe this is a way to turn off the 6M subs who watched him religiously through the pandemic when he was the only major figure telling the truth. I was one of those and never found anything I disagreed with other than his veganism. Tell me what he said that indicates to you he's for the WEF and the Great Reset.

Expand full comment

He points, he shrieks, but has he prompted you to take any action? Does he entertain you more than anything else? Does he actually teach you anything?

He functions as a kettle whistle, cruise director, placator. He is not alone.

Expand full comment

Funny he looks alien and has a whiny voice like bill gates

Expand full comment

“I as so busy at Oxford thinking great thoughts that, by the age of 21, I did not yet realize that I was a homosexual. Then, one morning, I awakened to the sensation of a painful pounding in my ass. It was my husband!!! I realized that I had been HACKED! The days of keeping people out of my ass were OVER.”

Expand full comment

, 😅🤣

Expand full comment

Harari, the high priest of WEF, popularized by “new scientists” like Sam Harris https://youtu.be/vTqOk19itfM

Expand full comment

Invisible menace has the potential to be more terrifying than violence as it can last longer- you can draw it out for a long time- even an eternity- the thing you can’t see. Good story tellers understand this- Hitchcock understood this. The psychos running the Bio-Security State know this.

This is why the perpetuation of the invisible virus that can strike anyone at any time is so useful as a control mechanism. The catapulting of GoF and “Covid” variants and on and on is part of this Psyop. Those who perpetuate these fabrications are part of the problem, knowingly or not, and are doing the work for the Bio-security State by maintaining and heightening the fear mechanisms.

The beauty of the idea of a “virus” is that it is an invisible, submicroscopic enemy. The result is an unparalleled spread of panic and fear, trumping even that of terrorists. The war on covid and “viruses” in general has effectively replaced the war on terror. “The Virus®” is the new Al Qaeda.

People who have fallen for this manufactured terror are desperate for explanations and heroes and “bombshell reports” right now. They want something simple and not too far afield that can explain it all away.

Start talking about global operations, conditional UBI, programmable CBDCs, digital slavery, mass surveillance rolled across the world via an endless series of manufactured crises and it’s all too much.

“It’s just a virus and some bad actors” say the public. “A bioweapon that needs to be contained next time” say the subverted Covid oppositional actors.

It was an epidemic of violent government and medical assault against people, of false attribution of death, and of intense propaganda using fraudulent tests and bogus studies introduced to bring about a dystopian Biosecurity state.

The official “Covid” narrative of is cold-blooded fiction. There was no pandemic.

If you haven't already take a look here- you are mentioned:

"NATO’s Trojan Horse Behind Europe’s COVID-19 Response – Part 1: Vaccinating Europe With a Military Experimental Biodefense Countermeasure"

https://21stcenturywire.com/2023/03/08/nato-trojan-horse-behind-europes-covid-19-response-part-1-vaccinating-europe-with-a-military-experimental-biodefense-countermeasure/

Expand full comment

The conditioning produced with the testing is impressive.

People who know there was no covid still say "well, if you test positive you have to isolate, you may give the bug to someone."

The truth is "because I was damaged by this useless testing and isolation many times, you must also suffer as I did, if you escape that is not fair, that's like not paying the bus ticket."

This way of thinking transcends the virus lie.

It's about attacking the other. Passing around the abuse, the fraud, the mental and the economic damage.

Expand full comment

A great analogy - well described!

Expand full comment

Thank you, Allen, for the link to this excellent article, a proper summary and up-to-date!

Expand full comment

Beautifully stated. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Love your writing style!

The tongue in cheek sarcasm is both refreshing and entertaining.

Expand full comment

"Artificially making a biological pathogen more deadly and more transmissible is impossible, because, if it were possible, it would have happened already in nature, and then we would not be around to discuss this on the internet." Bang on. And isn't it amazing how human beings have managed to survive all these thousands of years without vaccines?

Expand full comment

Exactly. Vaccines are just code for: "come and get in line for your poison, because if you don't, you'll get sick."

Expand full comment

Thank you, Sasha. A great common sense piece. God is the reality the Harari-type fools cannot grasp. We are from God, soul, spirit, much more than “narrative”. You are brilliant and the ‘gene-modifying scientists’ are indeed full of BS. So reassuring!

Expand full comment

Amen!

This technology failed over and over.

Remember how they were promoting CRISPR gene editing with fanciful stories of cloning sheep and modifying other animals?

If they were truly successful, it would have progressed. It did not, because it failed, animals died afterwards.

Brain chips and nanobots are another bullshit story.

If they worked, they would be showing how good it is, instead of giving us hype and marketing. The truth is that they have issues, like neuralink did with animal trials!

I hope more of those that question big pharma and big tech start to realize that these high tech dreams are just the trick to hide the real issues, the real control...

-propaganda

- poisoning via medicines and shots

-poisoning via pesticides in food and water supplies...

- fluoride in the water

And so on.

Expand full comment

Dostoyevsky couldn't have said it better; humanity devoid of divinity can't help but be foolish.

Expand full comment

Sasha...This made me happy and lifted my spirits today. I needed that. It reinforces what I know to be true!! Thank you for a great start to my weekend. Bless your heart!

Expand full comment

Agree God’s design is perfect. Man’s—-not so much.

Thanks, Sasha!

Expand full comment

Agree while mindful that there is no intrinsic opposition between evolution and Christian thought, the doctrine of the faith about man and his vocation. Pope John Paul II is worth reading on the branches of knowledge that make it possible “to reconcile two points of view which would seem irreconcilable”, where he analyses biological theory down to its constituents, noting their limits and how the philosophies inspiring then can be incompatible with the truth about man:

https://www.firstthings.com/article/1997/03/004-theories-of-evolution

Expand full comment

Thank you for the link. JP2 was brilliant. And compelling.

Expand full comment

Science, logic, theology all in the same post. Heaven! Or at least clarity in explaining the machinations of hell, and why they'll never work.

Expand full comment

Brilliant writing, Sasha. One of the best posts you and anyone has ever written on the Pandemic Industrial Complex. This will go down in history. Your posts should be made into a NYT Best Seller Book. You have broken this whole nightmare into pieces. Keep Going! Keep Speaking! Keep Writing!

Thank You! ❤️

Expand full comment

Bravo!

And people still in the trance are saying, "Oh, can't we just move on...?"

I don't want to go where they want to take us.

Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment

Kisses for you Saša, from Belgrade, I read all your texts and watch all your interviews, I learned a lot from you, and I especially like this text, God help us all. I would recommend your readers to read the books/texts of Father Seraphim Rose, or to listen to his lectures on YouTube.

Expand full comment

We are certainly just witnessing the dividing of the wheat from the chaff. The Creator’s final harvest of just souls. The chaff gets consumed by fire🙏🌎

Expand full comment

Please check out my most recent Substack on Daniel and Revelation, God bless🙏

Expand full comment

Wow Sasha, beautifully put. The text on the screen and the oils on the panel!:-)

Expand full comment