Hello Faith: Few persons ever comment to my critiques of corporate racketeering, as most are invested in the "system"... Your comment is right on. > Here's one of many articles - written by persons who knew the score. > Ending Corporate Governance - We The People
Hello Faith: Few persons ever comment to my critiques of corporate racketeering, as most are invested in the "system"... Your comment is right on. > Here's one of many articles - written by persons who knew the score. > Ending Corporate Governance - We The People
Refusal to allow corporate Charter barristers to take over the American Republic, was the intent of the Original 13th Amendment (also known as: (the "Titles of Nobility" Amendment).
The civil Republic has been operating under the rule of treasonous leadership since the days of Abraham Lincoln....
Oh my goodness! I missed your comment of July 3rd. I just went to that link you provided. THAT'S AMAZING! I never heard about that stuff before — that originally corporations operated under very limited charters, and:
"In exchange for the charter, a corporation was obligated to obey all laws, to serve the common good, and to cause no harm."
To "obey all laws, to serve the common good, and to cause no harm."!!!!! What a novel idea! (Sadly!) But that kind of an arrangement is the ONLY thing that makes any sense! How can we possibly put up with these vicious, evil, dangerous, self-serving, often-deadly, miserable excuses for businesses? Boy, did the Supreme Court ever SCREW UP by changing their status! I had no idea that things actually started out differently, with some measure of sanity. I just assumed that the big (horrible/ghastly) corporations were always like this!
So NOW what can we do about it? That Supreme Court ruling was obviously not legit: somebody or somebodies exerted undue influence— bribed or blackmailed the Court! It OBVIOUSLY was NOT in the best interests of We The People! When a Supreme Court decision turns out terribly badly, isn't there some recourse — a way to initiate a "do-over"? It is so blatantly obvious that they made a horrible mistake, and the outcome of that mistake is our current trajectory leading us down the path of Fascism and totalitarianism.
Hello Faith: There was good reason the forefathers provided Original 13th Amendment text detailing a prohibition against "Titles of Nobility". What exactly is an Esquire? And why do most American Bar members utilize the BAR Association designation?
The definition of "Legal Fiction" can be applied to many cases of law, wherein there is no jury of peers to create argument within the court. This obscuration of Lawful debate within courts has been intentional. >>> Legal fiction - Wikipedia >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_fiction
Hello Faith: Few persons ever comment to my critiques of corporate racketeering, as most are invested in the "system"... Your comment is right on. > Here's one of many articles - written by persons who knew the score. > Ending Corporate Governance - We The People
Revoking Our Plutocracy
9/23/03
https://ratical.org/corporations/index.html
Refusal to allow corporate Charter barristers to take over the American Republic, was the intent of the Original 13th Amendment (also known as: (the "Titles of Nobility" Amendment).
The civil Republic has been operating under the rule of treasonous leadership since the days of Abraham Lincoln....
Oh my goodness! I missed your comment of July 3rd. I just went to that link you provided. THAT'S AMAZING! I never heard about that stuff before — that originally corporations operated under very limited charters, and:
"In exchange for the charter, a corporation was obligated to obey all laws, to serve the common good, and to cause no harm."
To "obey all laws, to serve the common good, and to cause no harm."!!!!! What a novel idea! (Sadly!) But that kind of an arrangement is the ONLY thing that makes any sense! How can we possibly put up with these vicious, evil, dangerous, self-serving, often-deadly, miserable excuses for businesses? Boy, did the Supreme Court ever SCREW UP by changing their status! I had no idea that things actually started out differently, with some measure of sanity. I just assumed that the big (horrible/ghastly) corporations were always like this!
So NOW what can we do about it? That Supreme Court ruling was obviously not legit: somebody or somebodies exerted undue influence— bribed or blackmailed the Court! It OBVIOUSLY was NOT in the best interests of We The People! When a Supreme Court decision turns out terribly badly, isn't there some recourse — a way to initiate a "do-over"? It is so blatantly obvious that they made a horrible mistake, and the outcome of that mistake is our current trajectory leading us down the path of Fascism and totalitarianism.
Hello Faith: There was good reason the forefathers provided Original 13th Amendment text detailing a prohibition against "Titles of Nobility". What exactly is an Esquire? And why do most American Bar members utilize the BAR Association designation?
The definition of "Legal Fiction" can be applied to many cases of law, wherein there is no jury of peers to create argument within the court. This obscuration of Lawful debate within courts has been intentional. >>> Legal fiction - Wikipedia >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_fiction
The above is a long text, but worthy of study...