221 Comments

Mother f*ckers! We have something up our sleeve! OTA contract language is important. It ain’t over til it’s over.

Expand full comment

Sending good thoughts and prayers your way. I have one thing to say....F*#k Pfizer!!!

Expand full comment

It sickens me, and these criminals are still pushing the poison jab! People are still masked up in California 4 years after the con! Thank you for standing up to Goliath. May the Force be with you.

Expand full comment

Xavier Becerra thinks they should step into the annihilation booth. Therefore, they should step into the annihilation booth. Vendikar attacks!

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Jan 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment

This is "The US Army’s Forgotten Food Miracle" at https://ultimatesurvivalfoods.com/book/ Nothing about mRNA, no matter how cleverly misspelled. Why do you keep pestering us with this mislead?

Expand full comment

Will no one rid me of this post.

Expand full comment

Thank you Brook! This is very good news. I am sending prayers that truth and justice will prevail. As MAA said, "Mistakes Were NOT Made!" Godspeed! Much love and God's protection.

Expand full comment

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your monumental efforts to expose what was done to the entire world by the DOD (not just here). You have forced THEM to admit that Trump's Warp Speed poison was never intended to be a medical product but a weapon to be used in the kill-box THEY created. THEY can never claim good intent without admitting to perjury thanks to your efforts. You have already won by exposing the bums and making it for more difficult to run this scam again.

Expand full comment

Just for the record, this kill shot was formulated and patented years before project warp speed.

Expand full comment

Thank you for fighting for all of us!

Expand full comment

If it has to do with an omission of the real root cause of the PHE declaration or more specifically what is missing from it, then that might work. The clues are in the Debbie Lerman articles. If it's just that the FDA didn't do what we think it's supposed to barring that PHE declaration then not so much.

I did note that Barnes mentioned 21 USC 360 bbb for the very first time last week while he was on Infowars. Maybe there's some recognition finally....

Expand full comment

Hi JWM, I assume you're the same JWM commenting at ticker. If so, nice to see you. So, all the connections going back to the patriot act are being posted there (and here), and somehow KD won't entertain the thought that a deliberate event was rolled out to usher in the patriot act? Amazing.

I was banned from ticker for bringing up Larry Silverstein's "we made the decision to pull it" video.

Expand full comment

Non-elected bureaucrats like ICNIRP and elected ones like the captured agencies of the FCC exist to keep us thinking our cell phones are safe as well:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/safetymyth

Thank you for your work Brook.

Expand full comment

And even when people know cell phones and other wireless devices are NOT safe, it seems they're too addicted to stop using them.

Expand full comment

Sue the gov. for issuance of an illegal EUA!?? (THERE WERE SAFER REMEDIES: Hydroxyxhloriquine, Ivermectin, VitC....)

Expand full comment

Lawsuits are NOT the way forward. The 'legal' (Racketeering) actions reiterated in both Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova's multiple articles, clearly define "actus reus" on the part of multiple agencies and their assigns. This includes DOD, BARDA, HHS, FDA, and DOJ. (Sorry about all the alphabet soup.) All 'legal' constructs via these agencies should be considered acts of Treason and Sedition, and should be Registered as such in *District Courts*. These are Criminal violations and obviously not considered material evidence in cases of Tort lawsuit.

In Criminal Law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind") does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus (Latin for "guilty act") although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense. The liability is said to be strict because defendants will be convicted even though they were genuinely ignorant of one or more factors that made their acts or omissions criminal... None of this is about health or rights...

Expand full comment

Excellent! 👍

They do control the courts.

I was trying to focus the target area, addressing Brook Jackson's comment (OTA contract language?). We will bring it to JUDGEMENT, with God's help!

If something's not right it's wrong!

She's got "something up her sleeve". Interesting time to be alive! Stay-tuned folks! ☝️💥

Expand full comment

How would this happen? Who needs to do it?

Expand full comment

It's a damn good thing your attorneys aren't ignorant on the law 🇺🇸

God speed Brook 🙏

Expand full comment

Does it include dismantling this kill box they have us in? These laws have to be changed!

Expand full comment

Pfizer marketed their crap in states after the USG was no longer buying/distributing it, and I don't see why federal laws would usurp state laws against unfair and deceptive trade practices. Hence the State of Texas vs Pfizer lawsuit.

Expand full comment

This is not rocket science! Why can’t a proper complaint be written?

Expand full comment

Thank you for uncovering all this in black and white.

Canada has a very obvious legal cage under the Interim Order Regulations, Health Canada MUST approve if the Minister (of Health) orders it. They have no choice.

More here for those interested: Pages 4-11

https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/NCI-Interim-Report-C19-Vaccine-Authorization-Process-2023-09-14.pdf

I want to know why Pharma following cGMP for some attributes and totally ignored others. Working on it.

Expand full comment

They do whatever they want? Could care less about 'The Science"!!! 🤷

Expand full comment

Brook! Yes! Here’s to an Ultimate Sleeve Power Offense ♥️🤜💥

Expand full comment

💪👏. Godspeed.

Expand full comment

So if there is an emergency, anything goes?

If they see someone is about to be stung by a bee, to avoid that can they push that person in front of a speeding car?

Expand full comment

yes, exactly.

Expand full comment

Then Albert Bourla just happened to be driving by at that moment.

They must have coordinated with him, to time the push.

That's just a conspiracy theory I suppose.

Also the batches were shown to be lethal in a non-random way, proving intent.

Kind of like Albert's car had bayonets where the bumpers should be.

Expand full comment

what about that new post ya made about Debbie Lerman's findin's? I tried ta comment on her stack ta point ta your work an' Katherine's but comments are paywalled... She seems ta think we kin turn this backwards...legally, due to misuse of the law (we know 'bout that)... true? or doomed fer Disease X countermeasures down the road again?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 22
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Idiots! That is a live virus jab. I’m surprised with all the immunocompromised we haven’t had a case announced yet. Maybe too soon. I just can’t believe people keep taking these things.

Expand full comment

I heard this vax had a 31% chance of causing the illness it's supposed to prevent. Even through shedding.

Expand full comment

minor correction, if I may: if there is a CONTRIVED emergency. Particularly if it is of their own making, complete also with a cure of their own making, which will make them all filthy rich and omnipotent. In that case especially, yes, whatever they say , goes.

Expand full comment

Yes, except no where in the constitution does it say when there is an emergency all your rights disappear!! It is so unconstitutional. That’s why Sasha is so upset. That’s why none of it makes sense. People keep talking about the crime of which there is NOTHING to be done but maybe these laws can be fixed? They have to be fixed or we are up shits creek. They literally have made it legal to kill people & then there is nothing anyone can do about it. This is where all the focus should be. All of America should know this. I feel her pain. They all but ignored this. It’s all Rogan, Tucker, and the rest should be talking about. Years later and were still seeing graphs, and charts and why does fda not pull shots, blah, blah, blah. It’s time to talk about this VERY BIG PROBLEM. We think C19 was bad? These laws are still in place and they are working on more control to add to it. Justice will have to come from dismantling this kill box they have us in.

Expand full comment

You are not alone. They want you to feel alone but you're not. What really scares them is if people get together. They know they are finished if that happens.

They are working hard at their mighty Wurlitzer playing the climate tune and the disease x tune to scare people and keep them from moving, but people are beginning to stir and ignore their dirges.

Expand full comment

Heather H - exactly! While everyone is discussing and dissecting data ad nauseum (for about FOUR YEARS now!); the Evil Blob is continuing on their course. Priorities, people! For example: there must be no authority by anyone to declare a so-called ‘emergency’. Also: zero funding and closure/destruction of every single bioweapons lab. And: all countries must withdraw from the WHO, WEF, etc. until they’re dissolved to nothing. Everything else is downstream.

Expand full comment

“When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.”

— attributed to Thomas Jefferson

Expand full comment

Excellent quote from Thomas Jefferson. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I would recommend pausing the trial. First, we need to gather information to charge Becerra with treason. If he is convicted of treason, there will be many more options to come after Pfizer.

Expand full comment

Has he signed an Oath of Office?

Expand full comment

No. His and many other senior gov exec's oaths are either missing or improperly executed.

Expand full comment

I still think an argument can be made that they're failing in their duties to the public despite the oath. That's how their government protection can be stripped away which is likely the only way to do this provided we can get some attorneys to make the arguments in front of an impartial judiciary

Expand full comment

But there isn't a signed oath, right?

Expand full comment

Isn't that required to hold the office?

Expand full comment

Is that what Catherine was Finding? See this is an argument that's long been made by others as well like farmer Jones who's also an attorney on a New York lives in Florida now.

Expand full comment

I believe Attorney Todd Callender sent the FOIA for the Oaths of Office for Biden’s entire cabinet... after 9+ months of waiting, the FOIA request was returned with zero properly/legally executed Oaths of Office

https://www.aboutthesky.com/aboutthesky/smallstorm-blog/2357-attorney-todd-callender-no-valid-oaths-of-office-for-current-cabinet

Todd & Katherine spell out the decades-long, diabolical legislative and U.S. Government agency reorganization to facilitate the intended depopulation and humanity enslavement program.

Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally

Expand full comment

Well then I would argue that they personally have no actual legal cover inherent in their positions then. They need to be deposed on this.

Expand full comment

Do they explain a potential solution?

Expand full comment

My understanding is that none of Biden’s cabinet has a legally executed oath of office... either by not signing it or by it not being notarized (or both).

https://www.aboutthesky.com/aboutthesky/smallstorm-blog/2357-attorney-todd-callender-no-valid-oaths-of-office-for-current-cabinet

Expand full comment

Yes, he should have. That's the angle that KWatt has been advocating.

Expand full comment

Todd colander(sp) a lawyer is on this issue. He has some videos on Rumble where he talks about it. It’s crazy town! They woke a bunch of people up with C19. With that brought a bunch of people looking into things. Boy are they finding them.

Expand full comment

This whole messy story is a perfect illustration of how this federal government has become fascist, working hand-in-glove with industry. Fascism has ruled in this country for years now.

Expand full comment

We have been fascist since the start of the nation.

The founding fathers were fighting for a bigger cut of the profits by going independent. They didn't share the wealth. Slavery persisted even after the UK stopped it... Etc

https://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html

"We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is." - Judge Charles Evans Hughes

“Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.” ― Benjamin Franklin

Expand full comment

Summarizing the shyster gobbledegook of this “civil” case, Brook’s valid claim would be one of fraudulent advertising to the public leading to death and injury on the part of Pfizer, by making claims both on the part of commercial advertising and statements to the media that the trials had any validity or standing under existing FDA regulations. These fraudulent advertising and statements were designed to trick the public into taking a dangerous toxicant against their best interests. Pfizer is correct that suing Pfizer on the basis of committing fraud against the federal government is without merit as the federal government was a primary participant in this fraud. It would be similar to two guys conspiring to hold up a bank, and then one of them suing the other for fraud because he was supplied with a defective gun by the other. In this example “the two guys” are Pfizer, on the one hand, and DOD and HHS on the other.

Of course the federal court system is totally controlled by the parasite class which has no intention of a case being allowed leading to the question of treasonous and murderous laws allowing the federal government to commit enormous crimes according to natural law as well as the Constitution. If the federal court system were honest (/sarc), then all these unlawful acts, starting with the PREP act, would be thrown out as unconstitutional and unlawful. Then the primary individual participants who committed these crimes in full knowledge would be criminally indicted. A case could be made for the criminal indictment of all members of congress who voted for the PREP act as negligent homicide with perhaps 2 million counts. The House approved it by 308 to 106, the Senate by 93 to zero, and Boy Bush signed it. Thus only one-third of the House’s representative, none of the senators, and not Boy Bush should be left unindicted.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Jan 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment

You are either new to this site, very naive, or a troll. If you had read my comment, you would have realized that I said that all of these attempts to "legalize" the most horrendous crimes against the public are completely unConstitutional. However, a Supreme Court, which at least for the moment "decides" what is constitutional and what is not, is, to paraphrase Whitney Webb's amazing two volume book, One Court Under Blackmail. Actually, for the most part they are sociopathic to the point that they don't even need to be blackmailed, but it is a backup "insurance policy."

Expand full comment

Rule of law that protects individual is finished! Opinion of a lobbyist masquerading as a judge is

referencing EAU designation of kill shot. EAU is based on NO known anti viral remedy for viral infection-Ivermectin has been around 40 years and is both safe and effective. FDA approved the product and was sold over the counter before the scamdemic.-The criminals went after the technology with full force gale.

Expand full comment

Exactly. It’s wrong on so many levels!

Expand full comment

You mean EUA, right? Also, I recall HCQ being removed from over the counter, in France, in late 2019 I believe.

Expand full comment

Even for farm animals? I bought some when it was on sale because my dogs had brought fleas back from the Oregon coast, then forgot all about it.

Expand full comment

Ivermectin for humans was never over-the-counter here. I don't know about other countries. As I said, I just remember France pulling HCQ.

Expand full comment

Wasn't here, either. As Doc Brown (my HS chemistry professor) said, "Prescriptions are for civilized countries."

Expand full comment

Thank you! Stay on it, please

Expand full comment

I fear this monumental crime has been planned for so long, in such minute detail, that its "legality" appears to be ironclad.

That doesn't mean we should stop trying to get to the bottom of it and expose it far and wide. Only then might the necessary consequences follow.

Expand full comment

One chink in the armor, but it doesn’t apply to Pfizer. It applies to those who upheld vaccination mandates of all types without which no one would take the stuff in the first place. They’re illegal under the the Americans With Disabilities Act. Details here:

https://howtosee2020.com/discrimination/

Expand full comment

I recommend listening to the “Day Tapes” to understand just how long this has been going on...there are 4 tapes ...here’s #1 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcGqkvjKCvA&list=PLWZ75uVLfI8JoJG36wdKaLi8VGW5qD40Z&index=1

Expand full comment

Absolutely step by step! Each bioweapon development phase was run side by side to a fear campaign, first anthrax letters to initiate the prep act, the Ebola scare was used for the patriot act. Somewhere in the middle, corporations were deemed citizens by the Supreme Court, allowing them to purchase their politicians just like you’d purchase horses. It’s a tangled web of illegality, carefully built to avoid all accountability by every organization and Agency involved with EUAs, except for citizens. Bilking the taxpayers, gutting the middle class at the expense of the billionaires. Appointed Federal Judges are all beholden to the US DoJ, now acting as a branch of the White House, instead of the balance against executive overreach. Just look at the major players in this administration: Winken, Blinken, and Nod! (Mayorkis).

Expand full comment

So if HHS Secretary declares an emergency and cites EUA law, the federal government can just lie and maim and kill people? And even use monetary incentives to get doctors and hospitals to lie and maim and kill people. Is that what Congress intended? To put us in a totalitarian hell? Really?

Expand full comment

Yes

Expand full comment

Congress doesn't read or understand what they vote on. It's all orchestrated by underlying deep state and party politics.

Expand full comment

Correct

Expand full comment

Their ignorance is willful.

Expand full comment

The EUA is their get out of jail free card.

Expand full comment

Yes it seems that under DOD “Countermeasures” legal basis, so long as Health Secretary or UK Minister for Health, approve, ‘They’ can pretty much do what They want....

Expand full comment

Becerra from California is a chief abortionist killer. The face of evil.

Expand full comment

Well there you have it. Fraud and murder are immaterial to this government. Your honor I rest my case.

Expand full comment

Good summary of Pfizer's argument. Let's see what happens next!

Expand full comment

Soldiers that follow lawful government orders to kill enemy combatants are not guilty of murder. This applies to collateral deaths of civilian noncombatants.

However, if they operate without legal orders or go rogue and intentionally kill innocent, civilians they are committing murder.

Covid 'Vaccines' are not vaccines. They are countermeasures to biological agents. Bioweapons. They are like any other weapon, such as a rocket, tank, or bullet that can cause collateral damage and deaths when used lawfully in battle.

Thus, any deaths from the vaccines are considered collateral damage.

If the Covid virus existed, and was used intentionally as a bioweapon or leaked, then the use of countermeasures are apparently lawful, whether they work or not or if they're deadly or not. If however there was never a virus or bioweapon... Does it matter? Does the HHS secretary only have to think one has been used or has leaked? Is then the use of a countermeasure equivalent to a pre-emptive nuclear strike, before the enemy weapon is launched?

Expand full comment

Yep, one guy has the authority to THINK there MIGHT be a public health threat, so he can declare it so and begins the killer ball rolling. And that same guy is the only person with the authority to decide when said public health emergency is no longer a threat. Not even Congress can stop him.

Expand full comment

If JFK were still alive to write another "Profiles in Courage" Brook, Sasha and Katherine and Dr. Mike would each deserve a chapter. Thank you all for your efforts on behalf of humanity.

Expand full comment

I fully agree wrt Brook's, Sasha's, Katherine's and Yeadon's courage.

But, to set the record straight, JFK did not write that compilation of essays. It was revealed quite some time ago that it was ghostwritten for him. Just another Kennedy myth. Like the myth that he won the 1960 election.

Expand full comment

Ted Sorensen, JFK's speechwriter, did a lot of work on that book researching and editing, etc. But to say he completely ghost-wrote it is dishonest. We both know it.

Expand full comment

Unless you saw it with your own eyes, no one "knows" anything. And now with advanced AI/CGI, even what you see with your own eyes cannot be trusted.

Expand full comment

What are you talking about? All I said is Ted Sorensen was involved with JFK's book, but claiming "it was revealed that it was GHOSTWRITTEN for him", is dishonest. Revealed by who, and when exactly? Do you know the definition of ghostwritten?

Buh bye.

Expand full comment

To clarify - "But to say he completely ghost-wrote it is dishonest. *We both know it.*"

You seem oddly triggered by my comment. 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment

You give yourself too much credit. I don't get triggered, ever.

I said Sorensen didn't ghost-write JFK's book - ghost writing means being hired to create a product and put someone else's name on it. That isn't what happened.

The original commenter didn't reply, because my point is correct. You, on the other hand, are going on about AI. We're talking about a book that was written in 1956. 🤔. I'm done here.

Expand full comment