218 Comments
User's avatar
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

So if there is an emergency, anything goes?

If they see someone is about to be stung by a bee, to avoid that can they push that person in front of a speeding car?

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

yes, exactly.

Expand full comment
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

Then Albert Bourla just happened to be driving by at that moment.

They must have coordinated with him, to time the push.

That's just a conspiracy theory I suppose.

Also the batches were shown to be lethal in a non-random way, proving intent.

Kind of like Albert's car had bayonets where the bumpers should be.

Expand full comment
Daisy Moses Chief Crackpot's avatar

what about that new post ya made about Debbie Lerman's findin's? I tried ta comment on her stack ta point ta your work an' Katherine's but comments are paywalled... She seems ta think we kin turn this backwards...legally, due to misuse of the law (we know 'bout that)... true? or doomed fer Disease X countermeasures down the road again?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 22, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Heather H's avatar

Idiots! That is a live virus jab. I’m surprised with all the immunocompromised we haven’t had a case announced yet. Maybe too soon. I just can’t believe people keep taking these things.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

I heard this vax had a 31% chance of causing the illness it's supposed to prevent. Even through shedding.

Expand full comment
Camilla's avatar

minor correction, if I may: if there is a CONTRIVED emergency. Particularly if it is of their own making, complete also with a cure of their own making, which will make them all filthy rich and omnipotent. In that case especially, yes, whatever they say , goes.

Expand full comment
Heather H's avatar

Yes, except no where in the constitution does it say when there is an emergency all your rights disappear!! It is so unconstitutional. That’s why Sasha is so upset. That’s why none of it makes sense. People keep talking about the crime of which there is NOTHING to be done but maybe these laws can be fixed? They have to be fixed or we are up shits creek. They literally have made it legal to kill people & then there is nothing anyone can do about it. This is where all the focus should be. All of America should know this. I feel her pain. They all but ignored this. It’s all Rogan, Tucker, and the rest should be talking about. Years later and were still seeing graphs, and charts and why does fda not pull shots, blah, blah, blah. It’s time to talk about this VERY BIG PROBLEM. We think C19 was bad? These laws are still in place and they are working on more control to add to it. Justice will have to come from dismantling this kill box they have us in.

Expand full comment
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

You are not alone. They want you to feel alone but you're not. What really scares them is if people get together. They know they are finished if that happens.

They are working hard at their mighty Wurlitzer playing the climate tune and the disease x tune to scare people and keep them from moving, but people are beginning to stir and ignore their dirges.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Heather H - exactly! While everyone is discussing and dissecting data ad nauseum (for about FOUR YEARS now!); the Evil Blob is continuing on their course. Priorities, people! For example: there must be no authority by anyone to declare a so-called ‘emergency’. Also: zero funding and closure/destruction of every single bioweapons lab. And: all countries must withdraw from the WHO, WEF, etc. until they’re dissolved to nothing. Everything else is downstream.

Expand full comment
Steve Martin's avatar

“When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.”

— attributed to Thomas Jefferson

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Excellent quote from Thomas Jefferson. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

I would recommend pausing the trial. First, we need to gather information to charge Becerra with treason. If he is convicted of treason, there will be many more options to come after Pfizer.

Expand full comment
Tricia C's avatar

Has he signed an Oath of Office?

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

No. His and many other senior gov exec's oaths are either missing or improperly executed.

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

I still think an argument can be made that they're failing in their duties to the public despite the oath. That's how their government protection can be stripped away which is likely the only way to do this provided we can get some attorneys to make the arguments in front of an impartial judiciary

Expand full comment
Tricia C's avatar

But there isn't a signed oath, right?

Expand full comment
Tricia C's avatar

Isn't that required to hold the office?

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Is that what Catherine was Finding? See this is an argument that's long been made by others as well like farmer Jones who's also an attorney on a New York lives in Florida now.

Expand full comment
David Glassman's avatar

I believe Attorney Todd Callender sent the FOIA for the Oaths of Office for Biden’s entire cabinet... after 9+ months of waiting, the FOIA request was returned with zero properly/legally executed Oaths of Office

https://www.aboutthesky.com/aboutthesky/smallstorm-blog/2357-attorney-todd-callender-no-valid-oaths-of-office-for-current-cabinet

Todd & Katherine spell out the decades-long, diabolical legislative and U.S. Government agency reorganization to facilitate the intended depopulation and humanity enslavement program.

Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Well then I would argue that they personally have no actual legal cover inherent in their positions then. They need to be deposed on this.

Expand full comment
Heather H's avatar

Do they explain a potential solution?

Expand full comment
David Glassman's avatar

My understanding is that none of Biden’s cabinet has a legally executed oath of office... either by not signing it or by it not being notarized (or both).

https://www.aboutthesky.com/aboutthesky/smallstorm-blog/2357-attorney-todd-callender-no-valid-oaths-of-office-for-current-cabinet

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Yes, he should have. That's the angle that KWatt has been advocating.

Expand full comment
Heather H's avatar

Todd colander(sp) a lawyer is on this issue. He has some videos on Rumble where he talks about it. It’s crazy town! They woke a bunch of people up with C19. With that brought a bunch of people looking into things. Boy are they finding them.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

This whole messy story is a perfect illustration of how this federal government has become fascist, working hand-in-glove with industry. Fascism has ruled in this country for years now.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

We have been fascist since the start of the nation.

The founding fathers were fighting for a bigger cut of the profits by going independent. They didn't share the wealth. Slavery persisted even after the UK stopped it... Etc

https://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html

"We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is." - Judge Charles Evans Hughes

“Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.” ― Benjamin Franklin

Expand full comment
el Gallinazo's avatar

Summarizing the shyster gobbledegook of this “civil” case, Brook’s valid claim would be one of fraudulent advertising to the public leading to death and injury on the part of Pfizer, by making claims both on the part of commercial advertising and statements to the media that the trials had any validity or standing under existing FDA regulations. These fraudulent advertising and statements were designed to trick the public into taking a dangerous toxicant against their best interests. Pfizer is correct that suing Pfizer on the basis of committing fraud against the federal government is without merit as the federal government was a primary participant in this fraud. It would be similar to two guys conspiring to hold up a bank, and then one of them suing the other for fraud because he was supplied with a defective gun by the other. In this example “the two guys” are Pfizer, on the one hand, and DOD and HHS on the other.

Of course the federal court system is totally controlled by the parasite class which has no intention of a case being allowed leading to the question of treasonous and murderous laws allowing the federal government to commit enormous crimes according to natural law as well as the Constitution. If the federal court system were honest (/sarc), then all these unlawful acts, starting with the PREP act, would be thrown out as unconstitutional and unlawful. Then the primary individual participants who committed these crimes in full knowledge would be criminally indicted. A case could be made for the criminal indictment of all members of congress who voted for the PREP act as negligent homicide with perhaps 2 million counts. The House approved it by 308 to 106, the Senate by 93 to zero, and Boy Bush signed it. Thus only one-third of the House’s representative, none of the senators, and not Boy Bush should be left unindicted.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 21, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
el Gallinazo's avatar

You are either new to this site, very naive, or a troll. If you had read my comment, you would have realized that I said that all of these attempts to "legalize" the most horrendous crimes against the public are completely unConstitutional. However, a Supreme Court, which at least for the moment "decides" what is constitutional and what is not, is, to paraphrase Whitney Webb's amazing two volume book, One Court Under Blackmail. Actually, for the most part they are sociopathic to the point that they don't even need to be blackmailed, but it is a backup "insurance policy."

Expand full comment
Michael Kramer's avatar

Rule of law that protects individual is finished! Opinion of a lobbyist masquerading as a judge is

referencing EAU designation of kill shot. EAU is based on NO known anti viral remedy for viral infection-Ivermectin has been around 40 years and is both safe and effective. FDA approved the product and was sold over the counter before the scamdemic.-The criminals went after the technology with full force gale.

Expand full comment
Butterfly2510's avatar

Exactly. It’s wrong on so many levels!

Expand full comment
JonesySmart's avatar

You mean EUA, right? Also, I recall HCQ being removed from over the counter, in France, in late 2019 I believe.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Even for farm animals? I bought some when it was on sale because my dogs had brought fleas back from the Oregon coast, then forgot all about it.

Expand full comment
JonesySmart's avatar

Ivermectin for humans was never over-the-counter here. I don't know about other countries. As I said, I just remember France pulling HCQ.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Wasn't here, either. As Doc Brown (my HS chemistry professor) said, "Prescriptions are for civilized countries."

Expand full comment
Susan Skinner's avatar

Thank you! Stay on it, please

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

I fear this monumental crime has been planned for so long, in such minute detail, that its "legality" appears to be ironclad.

That doesn't mean we should stop trying to get to the bottom of it and expose it far and wide. Only then might the necessary consequences follow.

Expand full comment
Alex Eulenberg's avatar

One chink in the armor, but it doesn’t apply to Pfizer. It applies to those who upheld vaccination mandates of all types without which no one would take the stuff in the first place. They’re illegal under the the Americans With Disabilities Act. Details here:

https://howtosee2020.com/discrimination/

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

I recommend listening to the “Day Tapes” to understand just how long this has been going on...there are 4 tapes ...here’s #1 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcGqkvjKCvA&list=PLWZ75uVLfI8JoJG36wdKaLi8VGW5qD40Z&index=1

Expand full comment
Sherman's avatar

Absolutely step by step! Each bioweapon development phase was run side by side to a fear campaign, first anthrax letters to initiate the prep act, the Ebola scare was used for the patriot act. Somewhere in the middle, corporations were deemed citizens by the Supreme Court, allowing them to purchase their politicians just like you’d purchase horses. It’s a tangled web of illegality, carefully built to avoid all accountability by every organization and Agency involved with EUAs, except for citizens. Bilking the taxpayers, gutting the middle class at the expense of the billionaires. Appointed Federal Judges are all beholden to the US DoJ, now acting as a branch of the White House, instead of the balance against executive overreach. Just look at the major players in this administration: Winken, Blinken, and Nod! (Mayorkis).

Expand full comment
Cushman's avatar

So if HHS Secretary declares an emergency and cites EUA law, the federal government can just lie and maim and kill people? And even use monetary incentives to get doctors and hospitals to lie and maim and kill people. Is that what Congress intended? To put us in a totalitarian hell? Really?

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Yes

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

Congress doesn't read or understand what they vote on. It's all orchestrated by underlying deep state and party politics.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Correct

Expand full comment
Richard Greenwood's avatar

Their ignorance is willful.

Expand full comment
The Green Hornet's avatar

The EUA is their get out of jail free card.

Expand full comment
SeanBFlanagan's avatar

Yes it seems that under DOD “Countermeasures” legal basis, so long as Health Secretary or UK Minister for Health, approve, ‘They’ can pretty much do what They want....

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Becerra from California is a chief abortionist killer. The face of evil.

Expand full comment
MDskeptic's avatar

Well there you have it. Fraud and murder are immaterial to this government. Your honor I rest my case.

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

Good summary of Pfizer's argument. Let's see what happens next!

Expand full comment
Brent Rice's avatar

Soldiers that follow lawful government orders to kill enemy combatants are not guilty of murder. This applies to collateral deaths of civilian noncombatants.

However, if they operate without legal orders or go rogue and intentionally kill innocent, civilians they are committing murder.

Covid 'Vaccines' are not vaccines. They are countermeasures to biological agents. Bioweapons. They are like any other weapon, such as a rocket, tank, or bullet that can cause collateral damage and deaths when used lawfully in battle.

Thus, any deaths from the vaccines are considered collateral damage.

If the Covid virus existed, and was used intentionally as a bioweapon or leaked, then the use of countermeasures are apparently lawful, whether they work or not or if they're deadly or not. If however there was never a virus or bioweapon... Does it matter? Does the HHS secretary only have to think one has been used or has leaked? Is then the use of a countermeasure equivalent to a pre-emptive nuclear strike, before the enemy weapon is launched?

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

Yep, one guy has the authority to THINK there MIGHT be a public health threat, so he can declare it so and begins the killer ball rolling. And that same guy is the only person with the authority to decide when said public health emergency is no longer a threat. Not even Congress can stop him.

Expand full comment
robert stiles's avatar

If JFK were still alive to write another "Profiles in Courage" Brook, Sasha and Katherine and Dr. Mike would each deserve a chapter. Thank you all for your efforts on behalf of humanity.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

I fully agree wrt Brook's, Sasha's, Katherine's and Yeadon's courage.

But, to set the record straight, JFK did not write that compilation of essays. It was revealed quite some time ago that it was ghostwritten for him. Just another Kennedy myth. Like the myth that he won the 1960 election.

Expand full comment
JonesySmart's avatar

Ted Sorensen, JFK's speechwriter, did a lot of work on that book researching and editing, etc. But to say he completely ghost-wrote it is dishonest. We both know it.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

Unless you saw it with your own eyes, no one "knows" anything. And now with advanced AI/CGI, even what you see with your own eyes cannot be trusted.

Expand full comment
JonesySmart's avatar

What are you talking about? All I said is Ted Sorensen was involved with JFK's book, but claiming "it was revealed that it was GHOSTWRITTEN for him", is dishonest. Revealed by who, and when exactly? Do you know the definition of ghostwritten?

Buh bye.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

To clarify - "But to say he completely ghost-wrote it is dishonest. *We both know it.*"

You seem oddly triggered by my comment. 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment
JonesySmart's avatar

You give yourself too much credit. I don't get triggered, ever.

I said Sorensen didn't ghost-write JFK's book - ghost writing means being hired to create a product and put someone else's name on it. That isn't what happened.

The original commenter didn't reply, because my point is correct. You, on the other hand, are going on about AI. We're talking about a book that was written in 1956. 🤔. I'm done here.

Expand full comment
Lucinda's avatar

Legal cage. Evil entrapment. Crux of the matter. The controllers tell us they have legal immunity due to their own "laws" - nefarious & unconstitutional "laws" - put in place to escape judgement for their deadly & unnecessary products. Their own twisty laws give the evil villains a pass; a get out of jail card. Rinse & repeat.

(Just exactly like passage of the 1986 Childhood Vaxx Law - forcing parents to submit their kids to endless toxic jabs, making them ever sicker, damaged & less healthy, so their kids can attend public schools. And, instead of revolting & getting rid of evil toxic vaxx laws, parents just go-along, conform.)

Key point.

"The EUA law is part of the “legal cage” that Katherine Watt and I have been discussing for a long time now. The legal cage consists of public health emergency related laws and biodefense preparedness laws. All of them are built on lies. All of them presume that there is an imminent danger of “global pandemics” - the imaginary concept that has never materialized in history - based on which, the Constitutional governance and the rule of law must be abandoned in exchange for the rule by unelected bureaucrats. Those are of course puppets, on tight strings attached to private financial controllers. Xavier Becerra is one of such puppets. The controllers already made his opinion the final, unreviewable law in the US." (However, an EUA is not a real law but a sleight of hand work-around.)

Govt goons defending elites' "laws" as impossible to question or overturn. Stating that no one can question legislation, whether parents, officials, lawyers, judge or jury & that no one can ever hope to overturn the evildoers' heinous, anti-human, illegal overreach laws from enforcement. Rinse & repeat.

All my life, an evil govt-medical-industrial cabal has damaged, injured & killed so many millions & has largely escaped any justice for their medical crimes against humanity (& sadly, against my family too).

Do NOT comply w/evil. Resist their evil intent w/all your might - your smarts, your heart & good works. God help us all.

Expand full comment