Sasha, you are causing me to run out of superlatives. A medical freedom Nobel prize might be appropriate. You are putting into words that can be clearly understood, the genocidal strategies and tactics of the death cult called Big Pharma, and the criminal cartel called government. This is vital and completely necessary in order to destroy these monsters.
You are lifting the veil off the devils disguise, and what is revealed is a monster with no purpose other than death, destruction, and insatiable power. Sending my deepest wishes for your continued robust health and divinely inspired work.
Graphene was in Pfizer's Chinese product information. Also, it explains the strong para-magnetism in the injected... and that Japan returned all the Moderna batches due to para-magnetism.
Graphen power the nano-routers emitting Bluetooth in the injected by harvesting the microwaves and turning them into electricity. Even the injected buried in cemeteries emit Bluetooth.
The graphene argument is idiotic. Graphene is widely used as a lubricant for low temperature things.
So is the spike protein argument. EM imaging is like using tarot cards to tell what is in an unopened box. Actually, it's worse. It damages cells in the staining process.
The elephant in the room, the proven toxin is the lipid NANOPARTICLES.
In past vaccines, the toxins were formaldehyde, squalene, aluminum, mercury and related goodies.
Vaccines are just a sham to inject people with toxins.
I've not seen one honest study that they work at all.
The nanoparticles have indeed been shown to be highly inflammatory (at least in some) and cause liver damage in rats, yes. Both my mother and myself had liver pain after the jabs (I had to be jabbed or face unemployment as we had “no jab no job” mandates where I live). Fortunately a liver supplement had helped us both well on that front.
But don’t you think it takes a bit of hubris on your part to state so confidently that you KNOW that’s the only source of damage? Why not both, or all? Things in life are rarely so simple as to have one answer, and there is a vast range of adverse reactions to the jabs. I certainly think there’s ample evidence of the spike protein being a significant cause of harm. The graphene oxide is a bit more of an open question, but the notion of contamination from manufacturing seems a likely possibility.
For the record, I don’t agree with your characterisation of EM. Yes it’s very difficult to do, but it seems the technology has progressed sufficiently to make it more reliable - especially with the GO in use. And in this case, there were no cells to damage, only purified protein.
true but the point is that it is far too elaborate of a scheme to be worth the trouble, when the much cruder aspects of the shots do the job. even globalist conspirators and their minions are saddled with the same barely competent manufacturing and management that everyone else has to suffer with.
I disagree with this. " far too elaborate of a scheme to be worth the trouble,"
If you know of the Great Reset, then you know of the internet of persons, and the internet of things. Of course you know of the absolute control given to the globalists with the CBDC which is being imposed on all of us. While you also know about the IHR, and their plans to force inject us, confine us at their whim, basically remove our bodily choices.
In a world like this, tracking is required. Whether it be a passport, or an capsule surgically implanted or consumed, or an injectable that cannot be removed. If I were a totalitarian despot, I would prefer the injectable, for obvious reasons. And since I am a banker with unlimited funds, then research would be funded until they get it..
So, I have a question for you.
Do you think that self assembling nano tech in the human body will not be attained?
"Internet of persons" is a sci-fi narrative. It is a fairy tale with seductive tech to capture the "opposition". People who fall for this narrative help the perpetrators of the Reset.
In reality there is no functioning technology that will make an internet of persons or remote controlled humans or whatever. It's a narrative weapon. Of course one can inject people with graphene oxide, or synthetic spike, or toxic lipid nanojunk - it will produce injuries, death, or nothing. Just as we are observing now.
I am sorry Sasha but hearing this comment from a person of such high intellectual caliber is upsetting. Every scientific and technological breakthrough had been considered a sci-fi narrative. Until it wasn't.
There are plenty Sci fi narratives that remain Sci fi narratives no matter how much "techno progress" has achieved. I am re-reading 100 yo Sci fi, and it is still Sci fi. No worries.
Yes, I have not seen anything nano "functioning" either. That is the purpose of research, no ? And no one here knows what research they do behind closed doors either.
==========
As to being a narrative weapon, whats the point ? Because using words like "fairy tale" and "seduction" and "fall for it" are attempts at gas lighting. So for clarity, how do we help the globalists, by examing what they tell us then ?
"There is, however, hope. The most recent insights in nanotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), biosensors, and the Internet of Things could help overcome the current roadblocks in making personalized cell therapies affordable."
W.E.F..
=================
So since there are already RF chips for integration with the human body, the the internet of persons can be as simple as a passport, capsule, or otherwise integrated device.
According to David Bells analysis of the IHR, they intend to:
""Change existing IHR provisions affecting individuals from non-binding to binding, including border closures, travel restrictions, confinement (quarantine), medical examinations and medication of individuals. The latter would encompass requirements for injection with vaccines or other pharmaceuticals.""
=========================
So the internet of person, is just a chip away. Nano not required. And they will be able to force it on us if the IHR pass that power to the sociopaths at the W.H.O..
I reject the position that the internet of persons is fantasy or a disinfo plot. There was no reason provided for that rejection other than "nano tech non-functionality" with respect to that. When the internet of persons will not require nano tech to function. Put a chip in us, and call it the internet of persons, or the internet of things. No difference.
CBDC , IHR, and the ability to track us ( which they already tried to do with passports) are synergysitic.
"The Central Bank, will have absolute control on the rules and regulations which will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also we will have the technology to enforce that. "
1. "not seen nano functioning" = great, we are on the same page, none of this works. I can sell you 1,000,000,000 research projects of the same level of realistic implementation at scale.
2. "So for clarity, how do we help the globalists, by examing what they tell us then ?
"There is, however, hope. The most recent insights in nanotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), biosensors, and the Internet of Things could help overcome the current roadblocks in making personalized cell therapies affordable."
W.E.F.."
you just explained how we help them by falling for the narrative from WEF which you quoted. If you believe this narrative and tell others that they have been injected with technology that can now control them as this quote describes, you help WEF bluff their way into controlling the people. Because also, we just agreed in point 1 that none of this actually technologically controlled. Only mind controlled.
3."So since there are already RF chips for integration with the human body" - which ones? The ones I have my dogs chipped with? or something different?
4. "So the internet of person, is just a chip away" No, not really, there is much more to this that needs to happen technologically, plus this requires actually injecting real functioning chips (which are hard to make in semiconductor factories, much less self assemble in vivo. What looks like chips under microscopes may be simply theater props. There is a world of difference between a fake beard and a real one. But they may look identical on camera.
5. "I reject the position that the internet of persons is fantasy or a disinfo plot. " then we disagree. You have your own belief system.
6. "The Central Bank, will have absolute control on the rules and regulations which will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also we will have the technology to enforce that. "
Why using a chip, if people are being forced to use a smart phone with a QR code, required to make a normal living. Most people I know take it everywhere, even when walking the dog out. It had been so easy to nudge most people into taking the vax, even the contact tracing app was used by many. These controlfreaks just promise a little benefit and people go for it proudly. This is the biggest problem, imo.
So pray tell, show me something solid on the "90% graphene" claim or whatever else nonsense pseudoscience, like declaring GRAPHENE when there's plenty of other things that crystallize and look like that?
La quinta columna and others claim things by looking at microscope images...
Ask anyone skilled with a microscope if they can fully identify an element or molecule with just images. You'll hear about other tests, like spectral analysis which are needed to confirm the hunch based on the images seen.
disbelief is just as irrational as belief. Which is why I do neither.
""90% graphene" " who said this ?
"when there's plenty of other things that crystallize and look like that?"
So "what things" looks like "what "exactly ?
:You'll hear about other tests, like spectral analysis w"
gee really ? I posted such a link earlier.
THis is where we are at, and it was posted by another person on this thread.
" I am trained in live blood analysis and it appears that we have seen some structures that look like GO, but without a chemical breakdown, I cannot say definitively. "
Michelle Perro, MD
Until we get unfettered access to the materials, and access to the equipment, and access to people of integrity who would like to know, we will not know for sure. But on a balance of probabilities? they have intent, motive, and the technology to use it right now. So why not include it in the great nuremburg experiement they just did, because that is exactly what it was. There was no use for that shot, other than experimentation, because it was much too inefective to be anything else. I read the Pfizer AE document the day it was released from its 75 year purgatory. I knew it was unsafe and uneffective ( RRR v. ARR) +( VAER and Eudravigilance) quite early in the deployment of what some call the bio weapon. What I would call as the experiment which included experimenting with bio weapon technology amongst others. That is my understanding.
Such strange world: 1. A "product" with over 99% of survival rate. 2. Supposed remedy that as such fails in it designed objective. 3. Said remedy causing death and severe disability
in huge numbers of the recipients. 4. The product - still on Emergency Authorisation - still being administered.
5. No transparency forthcoming from creators and manufacturers in regards to the ingredients and processes involved. Am I too stupid to understand all this? What world do we live in that this is allowed to go on?
Thank you for the link. There is a lot of research being done with Graphene and its derivatives. Some people, want to make this a yes or no discussion about GO in the shots as working transmitters when no one has said that at all. The potential is there. But that isn't the point. This is a discussion about the great 5.3 billion person Nuremburg experiment.
Would they study Graphene in the great 5.3 billion person Nuremburg experiment? I think they would. 26 research teams in 13 countries say we should look harder at it. A few say they found it. At the least, it is research in progress. They KNOW what went in each batch. And when they inject us again, those experiments can continue.
Next question MUST be: for reasoned analysis, why would they not do it? When it is a substance of much potential benefit for a lot of bio-medical reasons, not just bio- transmitters.
Only answer I can find is integrity, and concern for our safety. And clearly these do not apply with the great 5.3 billion person Nuremburg experiment.
Here's another link pulled from GeoEngineeringWatch.org comment section on the Graphene Skies? Video. There are several more really good references in that comment section.
"5G technology cannot simply be scaled up from previous technology to meet the demands of high-speed communications of the future – it needs an enabling technology. Enter monolayer graphene."
some really sad points - why does defense have to collect and distribute vaccines? why is defense called when a train wreck happens? what has defense to do with all this - probably it is their virus, their jab and their mess. Anything involving defense stinks ! Think about the 2 German scientists who died in weird circumstances, who came out with the Graphene story.
"...probably it is their virus, their jab, their mess."
There's no "probably" about it..Go back and read Sasha's earlier articles, Dr David Martin, and Katherine Watt, among many others. Contracts and patents tell the story, along with previously enacted laws and presidential EOs, to cover any liability, lest anyone finds the trail. The trail has been found.
"We have reviewed your request and have determined that Human Coronavirus mRNA vacines ... (blah, blah, blah)... for active immunization to *prevent* Covid19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 in adults 18 years and older meet the criteria for fast track designation. Please note that if the *drug development program* does not continue to meet the criteria for the fast track designation, we may rescind the designation."
Reading this one would think that the fast track designation should be recinded because the "vaccines" do not prevent the disease Covid19 and the CDC has openly admitted that the vaccines do not prevent infection nor transmission.
But, looking closer, it refers to "the program" not meeting the criteria, not the resulting vaccines from the program. So as long as "the program" SAYS that is it's purpose, they can continue.
(I credit Jeff Childers (substack Coffe and Covid) with my new ability to spot the incongruity in some of these statements. )
This is on a different topic but very critical. New York State Attorney General has filed an appeal to reinstate Hochul’s quarantine camp regulation. AND this same Attorney General is promoting and taking part in a huge danger to our children - a Drag Queen story to cause gender confusion in kids! We’re making a protest on Sunday morning and need people to come and stand up to her horrors. Please see my article and spread it. https://truth613.substack.com/p/evil-plus-evil-new-york-state-attorney
Thank you for the excellent graphene review. I've been following this metal in terms of its usage in nanovaccinology which is found in the literature. Harms have been reported here: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1583/aa5476. I am trained in live blood analysis and it appears that we have seen some structures that look like GO, but without a chemical breakdown, I cannot say definitively. I do believe heavy metal binders should be taken as a precaution. I think we've all learned how trustworthy the Pharma cartel is.
Also, most interesting, same as La Quinta Columna and other brave doctors (three at least known to have been killed) dr. Young discusses the convergence with 5G/ 4G radiation which promotes the movement of graphene, the self assembling of nanoparticles and the amplification of frequencies from GHz to THz (6G domain). The associated research that can be found for free regarding the use of graphene for drug delivery, neuronal interface, intra body sensory network etc is overwhelming.
This page contains a partial list of the doctors and researchers who support the idea of graphene's presence in the jabs and some other useful references: https://unitefortruth.online/covid-vaxx-ai-control
There's a few points of most common sense in this theory of graphene's presence in the injections... One is the experimental scientific proof using adequate devices such as dr. Pablo Campra, dr. Robert Young, dr. Antonietta Gatti and dr. Rob Verkerk & team (at least) have done. Another is the huge amount of available literature showing that graphene is and can be further used for drug delivery and intra body control of cells in living organism corelated with the great industrial developments around graphene (see for example Graphene Flagship to which Astrazeneca is a known member). Then the related toxicity studies of graphene which cover the entire range of the most important side effects of the injections - and kind of all when adding the microwave sickness effects (that are multiplied by graphene's EMF conductivity and amplification). In matters of the supposed graphene in the jabs' interaction with the blood there are again experimental studies that corelate with actual science on this issue.
Finally and morally speaking, the most important argument: the reality of some experts being killed shortly after speaking publicly on this subject and the curtain of silence surrounding the subject from all existent authorities indicating a huge risk for all those daring to speak out that is obviously known and assumed by them.
But anyway, if this world would have only heroes we would not call them heroes, but just normal human beings, isn't it?
P.S. Thank you very much Nod for your contribution here... agree with all your observations
Thanks for putting this together Sasha. It is quite difficult finding info on graphene, other than that video of Dr. Noack circulating around. I wouldn't want that "mesh" in my blood, but for now I still assume we all have it inside us somehow. Why I believe energy medicine, biogeometry (Dr. Karim) prayer is the final frontier in healing.
We were all fooled at one point or another. We were educated into a ("leave it to beaver mentality that trusted authority" ) that sustained for decades.
25 years ago a close friend died couple of days after a vaccine.
I learned from that and never took another.
An extremely talented musician and artist died for what I see now as a "big pharma junkie" culture. To capitalize on addiction to drugs. Mandated addictions are best I guess.
They have always treated us like garbage for disposal.. Flouride poison in the water for absolutely ZERO benefit. EMF toxicity they refuse to study, because you cannot find what you do not look for. Calling us criminal because we prefer the peace of marijuana over the brain damage and social harm of alcohol.
9/11, 2001, I learned we were at war with .01%
Jan 1, 2020 we lost. When we allowed unelected public health authorities to MURDER people with toxshots, lockdowns and coercion, in the interest of the .01 %
Now they are building the jails in which we will live .( CBDC, IHR, 15 minute cities, tracking)
And 25 years later, they still call this Great Reset as conspiracy theory, in ognorance of the objective presense just a quick search away. They use conspiracy theory as ad hom as they were taught to via propaganda. Without understanding that one uses conspiracy theory, in order to find conspiracy fact. Ask any public prosecutor.
So until they impose the CBDC, and the IHR, this is conspiracy theory. As soon as they impose these jails on us, it is conspiracy fact.
Fait accompli, IMO, but we will see, and not before long.
Look at twitter, all awash with lab leaks, masks, and the leucotomy called politics. While few have a clue about the jails being built around us.
Absolutely Nod, took this to wake me up, uni biology from 30 years ago made my alarm bells ring when they casually mentioned they were using mRNA (and DNA vector vaccines), no one knows enough to be interfering with that complex, delicate and fundamentally important system... No one ...
Since then I can just see it all, clear as day, the corrupt and the useful idiots, all pushing us towards a prison. Most love going with the crowd, even when you point out the obvious, a lot of people will say "I prefer not to think about it, my anxiety" or "but they wouldn't do that", problem is "they" ARE doing it, in front of your face, the word conspiracy exists for a reason, people conspire all the time...
The "soft" introduction of 15 minute cities, as a "trial"... You do not spend money on infrastructure for a "trial"... The line after the "trial" run will be it was so wildly successful that council (or the powers that be) have decided to impliment this trial full time... Making (insert your local area's name here) one of the greenest carbon neutral places on earth... Don't worry we'll only do this until the climate emergency is over... (Oh dear the climate emergency will never be over... Climate of course will always change due to many factors)...
Within a generation if this is allowed to proceed the grandchildren will never know a time when there wasn't a climate emergency, they will wonder what type of climate their ancestors lived in back when everything was okay... If only they knew that nothing has really changed and they're been fooled by an illusion...
They'll be used to a loss of bodily autonomy, where people are forced or conned to take a poison that will kill and injure them... and not save anyone.
They'll be living a sci fi movie (those that are left)...
They are making room to buy more because when people allow the pirates to take over, extortion and plunder is what they get.
The question of what was in those vials is important, but also the question of when they started to mass produce that crap. Was it in 2019, 18, or even earlier?
Will the masses ever be told that the products were designed and manufactured before they invented the disease and the virus?
I remember one conjecture that appeared a few months ago: the oldest lots are expired and don't kill people as much as the fresher lots of product.
How long does the LNPs last sitting in those vials?
I have sachets of industrial mayo sauce in the freezer since 2011, Can I sell them on ebay as WMDs or are they completely harmless by now and ebay will refuse to sell a fraud, unlike Queen Ursula and family?
This science of manufacturing the "small jewelry" that are proteins is both impressive and extremely dumb.
Like making plastic jewelry imitations that look better than the very expensive things, but no one wants them and is a complete waste of work and energy.
People should not be killed over junk designed to decorate the stage that backs up the greatest financial heist in history.
Sasha you are a force to be reckoned with..! a force for clarity and clear Communication of this complex and vitally important subject matter.. Thank you for knocking it out of the park, continuously! Like I said before You are a Bad Rad Momma!
Graphene Oxide and Graphene Hydroxide. I'd appreciate insights from medical types who wish to weigh in on what they believe about this study of their use in vaccines, and to correct any mistakes I've made in interpreting it. We know from this 2018 study that graphene had already been identified as a promising adjuvant in vaccines prior to CV and OWS. But it had serious safety concerns. That led them to experiment with different types of coatings and sizes that balanced safety and durability. Seems to be a precursor to the Pfizer study above.
Because of the properties of graphene it is able to increase the uptake of a substance into the body. It penetrates blood cells to deliver the drug inside, evade a cell's defenses. It can also be delivered directly to an organ inside the body which acts as a magnet to attract more graphene and build scaffolding there for implants to be created, allowing for novel targeted treatments. But this isn't done without risk of injury. They have been experimenting with ways to use the best properties of graphene for increased pharmaceutical uptake without inducing known injury. They try different coatings to prevent injury, but the coatings make graphene less effective, they pass through the system faster without as much uptake.
"Due to the sharp edges of GO and rGO, hemolytic effects might be expected in vivo, possibly caused by nanomaterial blades disrupting cell membranes, as reported for GO interactions with bacteria.
Feng and colleagues discovered RBC morphological alterations and aggregation above 100 mg mL1 and hemolytic effects
above 10 mg mL1 reaching 96% at 500 mg mL1. Lower hemolytic concentrations have been reported by other groups.
Small GO flakes (few hundreds of nm) seem to be more destructive."
"Hemostasis cascade prevents blood loss from injured tissue and maintains blood fluidity. The final hemostasis is driven by
platelets, which form the clot, a mixture of red blood cells, aggregated platelets, fibrin and other cellular elements (Fig. 3-2b).
If the clot forms abnormally, it can induce thrombosis.
Thrombogenicity is an important feature evaluated in nanomaterial design for in vivo delivery and represents the propensity to induce blood clotting and induce occlusion of a blood vessel by a thrombus."
"Furthermore, nanoparticles engineered to have longer systemic circulation times increase the likelihood of contact with blood components including the coagulation system, with thrombogenicity risks."
"When administered in vivo (250 mg kg1 body weight), 48% of lung vessels were partially occluded after 15 minutes"
"Biodistribution and biosafety of GO: future challenges
The focus of this review is the GO interaction with blood components and BC in light of the future design of GO pharmaceutical delivery systems. Intravenously injected drug delivery systems (DDS) developed so far include PEGylated nanographene sheets for tumor passive targeting, rGO functionalized with chitosan and iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles for the delivery of doxorubicin and epidermal growth factor receptor antibody-conjugated PEGylated nanographene oxide for epirubicin delivery in tumors.
Nanoparticles intended for drug delivery applications are being engineered to reduce their clearance and extend systemic
circulation times and thus increase the opportunity for targeted delivery. However, the disadvantage of prolonged circulation times is the greater chance of interaction with blood components and activation of adverse effects.
Before any nanomaterial translation into clinical therapy, there are biosafety concerns that need to be addressed. We have
seen how GO interacts with blood system components and how BC can influence these interactions, but what is the biodistribution and the toxicity when GO is administered intravenously"
"The early study of Zhang and colleagues determined the distribution and biocompatibility of i.v. injected GO in mice.
The half-life of GO in blood is much longer than in other carbon nanomaterials (B5 hours). Within 48 hours after i.v.
injection, GO is cleared from the bloodstream and distributed throughout various organs with preferred accumulation in the
lungs, liver, and spleen. The lack of pathological changes was reported after 14 days of treatment at a low dose (1 mg kg1
), Fig. 5 Illustration of the short-term effects of GONPs and rGONPs on THP-1 cells, and the long-term effects on THP-1a differentiation from THP-1 cells. GONPs and rGONPs could have induced ROS formation and activated the NF-kB pathway in THP-1 cells. rGONPs could not fully transcript proinflammatory genes due to lack of additional transcription factors but at a higher dose (10 mg kg1), granulomatous lesions, pulmonary edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis throughout the lung were observed. Many studies confirmed that the primary site of GO accumulation and toxicity in vivo is the lungs. It seems that the pathological effects on the lungs are proportional to the degree of dispersion and oxidation of GO."
"A systematic study on GO size, dose and dosing frequency was conducted by Liu and colleagues. Liu intravenously administered two types of GO: small GO flakes (s-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B250 nm) and large GO flakes (l-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B900 nm) at a single high dose (2.1 mg kg1) or seven repeated low doses (0.3 mg kg1); irrespective of size, the single high-dose administration of GO induced lung damage and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In the lungs, GO accumulated in the macrophages but not in the lymphocytes, which were recruited but were not able to trap GO. In this study, the authors claimed that although oxidative stress is a widely existent phenomenon in cells exposed in vitro to GO, the
protective effect of proteins forming a BC around GO should be considered in vivo.
Interesting size-dependent results were reported for multipledose exposure. The s-GO did not induce renal damage or accumulate in the kidneys since it was quickly eliminated through the glomeruli. Conversely, l-GO failed to be cleared
through kidneys and induced damage. The lungs were damaged only after multiple doses of l-GO. This effect depends on the
aggregation of GO with proteins that induce the blockage of large GO-complexes in the lungs. The hypothesis relies on the
formation of multiple complexes of l-GO and proteins that enter the capillaries and create multiple injury points and inflammatory cell recruitment. s-GO could instead pass through lungs capillaries after each low-dose administration. The kidneys and lungs were more damaged by l-GO, while the s-GO preferentially accumulated in the liver with toxic effects.
At a high single dose, s-GO can also damage the lungs since at high concentration it forms large complexes that reach a similar size to the l-GO protein complex"
"Finally, the degradation of injected GO is an important biosafety concern. Long-term interaction (14 days) of GO with plasma causes reduction and biodegradation with hole formation caused by the action of hydroxyl radicals. Once internalized by the immune cells, biodegradable particles are digested and cleared from the body, while non-biodegradable particles accumulate in cells for extended periods."
FF commentary: There's a lot of chemistry that informs us about the properties of graphene. It is a metal that develops some of the strongest bonds known to man. Graphene bonds in a honeycomb side-by-side coagulation of atoms, one-layer thick (one atom). Virtually indestructible. It's used on high performance brake pads, doesn't wear out. It has a very strong ionic charge that attracts and bonds with other graphene atoms in this configuration. Which makes for the sharpest nanorazor edges possible. An edge of a graphene knife one atom thick can cut through anything. Including blood cells and the inside of necessarily smooth blood vessels and internal organs it eventually embeds itself in. And when other graphene particles and flakes are present they are drawn to each other, growing in size. They become "scaffolding" that builds on itself. And fwiw, scaffolding is a lot like an antenna. For the more conspiratorial readers out there to infer the implications of.
Sasha I think the story in this article is when you mention not knowing what the vaccine is actually creating in the body.We thought spike protein?? But now it's and unknown substance.God help us!!
Sasha- I don’t understand why Karen Kingston takes every opportunity to attack you. It’s so ‘High School’.
You both do incredible work and should be collaborating to bring down the criminals. I know you don’t let it bother you, but I wanted you to know that I tried to defend you in her Comment section previously, and she still wrote another hit piece attacking you today. The many battles of infighting in The Truth Movement is not helping anybody.
Know that you have tons of support and we are grateful for your persistence, maturity and integrity. ❤️
I never participated in high school drama, and I am not planning to start now. I don't feel the need to attack anyone, since I am not threatened by or fearful of anyone, "in the movement" or outside of it. Besides, Karen blocks me on her substack so I can't read what she writes, lol.
I don’t know her personally but when I saw the graphene document behind her paywall, it just rubbed me the wrong way. Did not expect that kind of trivial greed from her. But coupled to what is mentioned here (the unnecessary drama, the blocking, and an attitude that comes across as petty professional jealousy) it seems I’ll have to re-evaluate how much I trust what she has to say.
Sasha, you are causing me to run out of superlatives. A medical freedom Nobel prize might be appropriate. You are putting into words that can be clearly understood, the genocidal strategies and tactics of the death cult called Big Pharma, and the criminal cartel called government. This is vital and completely necessary in order to destroy these monsters.
You are lifting the veil off the devils disguise, and what is revealed is a monster with no purpose other than death, destruction, and insatiable power. Sending my deepest wishes for your continued robust health and divinely inspired work.
I love your cogent uncovering of this conversation. Thanks for your great work. You and Katherine are the stars of Galadriel
Graphene was in Pfizer's Chinese product information. Also, it explains the strong para-magnetism in the injected... and that Japan returned all the Moderna batches due to para-magnetism.
Graphen power the nano-routers emitting Bluetooth in the injected by harvesting the microwaves and turning them into electricity. Even the injected buried in cemeteries emit Bluetooth.
Open your eyes to the whole plan (my subs):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
Thank you for sharing this. I hope the whole truth will come out someday, about these injections! And by the way.. beautiful painting at the end 💜🙏
Love the Day’s art!
Me as well
The graphene argument is idiotic. Graphene is widely used as a lubricant for low temperature things.
So is the spike protein argument. EM imaging is like using tarot cards to tell what is in an unopened box. Actually, it's worse. It damages cells in the staining process.
The elephant in the room, the proven toxin is the lipid NANOPARTICLES.
In past vaccines, the toxins were formaldehyde, squalene, aluminum, mercury and related goodies.
Vaccines are just a sham to inject people with toxins.
I've not seen one honest study that they work at all.
Endotoxin in every vial
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/saturday-endotoxin-roundup-iii
That's correct, they have endotoxins through the roof.
The nanoparticles have indeed been shown to be highly inflammatory (at least in some) and cause liver damage in rats, yes. Both my mother and myself had liver pain after the jabs (I had to be jabbed or face unemployment as we had “no jab no job” mandates where I live). Fortunately a liver supplement had helped us both well on that front.
But don’t you think it takes a bit of hubris on your part to state so confidently that you KNOW that’s the only source of damage? Why not both, or all? Things in life are rarely so simple as to have one answer, and there is a vast range of adverse reactions to the jabs. I certainly think there’s ample evidence of the spike protein being a significant cause of harm. The graphene oxide is a bit more of an open question, but the notion of contamination from manufacturing seems a likely possibility.
For the record, I don’t agree with your characterisation of EM. Yes it’s very difficult to do, but it seems the technology has progressed sufficiently to make it more reliable - especially with the GO in use. And in this case, there were no cells to damage, only purified protein.
"The graphene argument is idiotic. "
ignorance is not knowlege.
true but the point is that it is far too elaborate of a scheme to be worth the trouble, when the much cruder aspects of the shots do the job. even globalist conspirators and their minions are saddled with the same barely competent manufacturing and management that everyone else has to suffer with.
I disagree with this. " far too elaborate of a scheme to be worth the trouble,"
If you know of the Great Reset, then you know of the internet of persons, and the internet of things. Of course you know of the absolute control given to the globalists with the CBDC which is being imposed on all of us. While you also know about the IHR, and their plans to force inject us, confine us at their whim, basically remove our bodily choices.
In a world like this, tracking is required. Whether it be a passport, or an capsule surgically implanted or consumed, or an injectable that cannot be removed. If I were a totalitarian despot, I would prefer the injectable, for obvious reasons. And since I am a banker with unlimited funds, then research would be funded until they get it..
So, I have a question for you.
Do you think that self assembling nano tech in the human body will not be attained?
"Internet of persons" is a sci-fi narrative. It is a fairy tale with seductive tech to capture the "opposition". People who fall for this narrative help the perpetrators of the Reset.
In reality there is no functioning technology that will make an internet of persons or remote controlled humans or whatever. It's a narrative weapon. Of course one can inject people with graphene oxide, or synthetic spike, or toxic lipid nanojunk - it will produce injuries, death, or nothing. Just as we are observing now.
I am sorry Sasha but hearing this comment from a person of such high intellectual caliber is upsetting. Every scientific and technological breakthrough had been considered a sci-fi narrative. Until it wasn't.
https://efvv.eu/news/project-bluetooth-experience-x
There are plenty Sci fi narratives that remain Sci fi narratives no matter how much "techno progress" has achieved. I am re-reading 100 yo Sci fi, and it is still Sci fi. No worries.
Yes, I have not seen anything nano "functioning" either. That is the purpose of research, no ? And no one here knows what research they do behind closed doors either.
==========
As to being a narrative weapon, whats the point ? Because using words like "fairy tale" and "seduction" and "fall for it" are attempts at gas lighting. So for clarity, how do we help the globalists, by examing what they tell us then ?
"There is, however, hope. The most recent insights in nanotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), biosensors, and the Internet of Things could help overcome the current roadblocks in making personalized cell therapies affordable."
W.E.F..
=================
So since there are already RF chips for integration with the human body, the the internet of persons can be as simple as a passport, capsule, or otherwise integrated device.
According to David Bells analysis of the IHR, they intend to:
""Change existing IHR provisions affecting individuals from non-binding to binding, including border closures, travel restrictions, confinement (quarantine), medical examinations and medication of individuals. The latter would encompass requirements for injection with vaccines or other pharmaceuticals.""
=========================
So the internet of person, is just a chip away. Nano not required. And they will be able to force it on us if the IHR pass that power to the sociopaths at the W.H.O..
I reject the position that the internet of persons is fantasy or a disinfo plot. There was no reason provided for that rejection other than "nano tech non-functionality" with respect to that. When the internet of persons will not require nano tech to function. Put a chip in us, and call it the internet of persons, or the internet of things. No difference.
CBDC , IHR, and the ability to track us ( which they already tried to do with passports) are synergysitic.
"The Central Bank, will have absolute control on the rules and regulations which will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also we will have the technology to enforce that. "
Augustin Carstens
BIS General Manager. AKA The underboss...
Thank you for the reply
1. "not seen nano functioning" = great, we are on the same page, none of this works. I can sell you 1,000,000,000 research projects of the same level of realistic implementation at scale.
2. "So for clarity, how do we help the globalists, by examing what they tell us then ?
"There is, however, hope. The most recent insights in nanotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), biosensors, and the Internet of Things could help overcome the current roadblocks in making personalized cell therapies affordable."
W.E.F.."
you just explained how we help them by falling for the narrative from WEF which you quoted. If you believe this narrative and tell others that they have been injected with technology that can now control them as this quote describes, you help WEF bluff their way into controlling the people. Because also, we just agreed in point 1 that none of this actually technologically controlled. Only mind controlled.
3."So since there are already RF chips for integration with the human body" - which ones? The ones I have my dogs chipped with? or something different?
4. "So the internet of person, is just a chip away" No, not really, there is much more to this that needs to happen technologically, plus this requires actually injecting real functioning chips (which are hard to make in semiconductor factories, much less self assemble in vivo. What looks like chips under microscopes may be simply theater props. There is a world of difference between a fake beard and a real one. But they may look identical on camera.
5. "I reject the position that the internet of persons is fantasy or a disinfo plot. " then we disagree. You have your own belief system.
6. "The Central Bank, will have absolute control on the rules and regulations which will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also we will have the technology to enforce that. "
Augustin Carstens
I don't take criminals' word for it. You do.
Why using a chip, if people are being forced to use a smart phone with a QR code, required to make a normal living. Most people I know take it everywhere, even when walking the dog out. It had been so easy to nudge most people into taking the vax, even the contact tracing app was used by many. These controlfreaks just promise a little benefit and people go for it proudly. This is the biggest problem, imo.
Trust someone that is seeking truth rather than someone has has found it.
So pray tell, show me something solid on the "90% graphene" claim or whatever else nonsense pseudoscience, like declaring GRAPHENE when there's plenty of other things that crystallize and look like that?
La quinta columna and others claim things by looking at microscope images...
Ask anyone skilled with a microscope if they can fully identify an element or molecule with just images. You'll hear about other tests, like spectral analysis which are needed to confirm the hunch based on the images seen.
disbelief is just as irrational as belief. Which is why I do neither.
""90% graphene" " who said this ?
"when there's plenty of other things that crystallize and look like that?"
So "what things" looks like "what "exactly ?
:You'll hear about other tests, like spectral analysis w"
gee really ? I posted such a link earlier.
THis is where we are at, and it was posted by another person on this thread.
" I am trained in live blood analysis and it appears that we have seen some structures that look like GO, but without a chemical breakdown, I cannot say definitively. "
Michelle Perro, MD
Until we get unfettered access to the materials, and access to the equipment, and access to people of integrity who would like to know, we will not know for sure. But on a balance of probabilities? they have intent, motive, and the technology to use it right now. So why not include it in the great nuremburg experiement they just did, because that is exactly what it was. There was no use for that shot, other than experimentation, because it was much too inefective to be anything else. I read the Pfizer AE document the day it was released from its 75 year purgatory. I knew it was unsafe and uneffective ( RRR v. ARR) +( VAER and Eudravigilance) quite early in the deployment of what some call the bio weapon. What I would call as the experiment which included experimenting with bio weapon technology amongst others. That is my understanding.
Such strange world: 1. A "product" with over 99% of survival rate. 2. Supposed remedy that as such fails in it designed objective. 3. Said remedy causing death and severe disability
in huge numbers of the recipients. 4. The product - still on Emergency Authorisation - still being administered.
5. No transparency forthcoming from creators and manufacturers in regards to the ingredients and processes involved. Am I too stupid to understand all this? What world do we live in that this is allowed to go on?
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant Aug 2020
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/
There's probably follow up research, this was just a quick search.
Thank you for the link. There is a lot of research being done with Graphene and its derivatives. Some people, want to make this a yes or no discussion about GO in the shots as working transmitters when no one has said that at all. The potential is there. But that isn't the point. This is a discussion about the great 5.3 billion person Nuremburg experiment.
Would they study Graphene in the great 5.3 billion person Nuremburg experiment? I think they would. 26 research teams in 13 countries say we should look harder at it. A few say they found it. At the least, it is research in progress. They KNOW what went in each batch. And when they inject us again, those experiments can continue.
Next question MUST be: for reasoned analysis, why would they not do it? When it is a substance of much potential benefit for a lot of bio-medical reasons, not just bio- transmitters.
Only answer I can find is integrity, and concern for our safety. And clearly these do not apply with the great 5.3 billion person Nuremburg experiment.
Here's another link pulled from GeoEngineeringWatch.org comment section on the Graphene Skies? Video. There are several more really good references in that comment section.
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/graphene-skies/
"5G technology cannot simply be scaled up from previous technology to meet the demands of high-speed communications of the future – it needs an enabling technology. Enter monolayer graphene."
https://grolltex.com/the-future-of-graphene-and-5g/
some really sad points - why does defense have to collect and distribute vaccines? why is defense called when a train wreck happens? what has defense to do with all this - probably it is their virus, their jab and their mess. Anything involving defense stinks ! Think about the 2 German scientists who died in weird circumstances, who came out with the Graphene story.
"...probably it is their virus, their jab, their mess."
There's no "probably" about it..Go back and read Sasha's earlier articles, Dr David Martin, and Katherine Watt, among many others. Contracts and patents tell the story, along with previously enacted laws and presidential EOs, to cover any liability, lest anyone finds the trail. The trail has been found.
"We have reviewed your request and have determined that Human Coronavirus mRNA vacines ... (blah, blah, blah)... for active immunization to *prevent* Covid19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 in adults 18 years and older meet the criteria for fast track designation. Please note that if the *drug development program* does not continue to meet the criteria for the fast track designation, we may rescind the designation."
Reading this one would think that the fast track designation should be recinded because the "vaccines" do not prevent the disease Covid19 and the CDC has openly admitted that the vaccines do not prevent infection nor transmission.
But, looking closer, it refers to "the program" not meeting the criteria, not the resulting vaccines from the program. So as long as "the program" SAYS that is it's purpose, they can continue.
(I credit Jeff Childers (substack Coffe and Covid) with my new ability to spot the incongruity in some of these statements. )
This is on a different topic but very critical. New York State Attorney General has filed an appeal to reinstate Hochul’s quarantine camp regulation. AND this same Attorney General is promoting and taking part in a huge danger to our children - a Drag Queen story to cause gender confusion in kids! We’re making a protest on Sunday morning and need people to come and stand up to her horrors. Please see my article and spread it. https://truth613.substack.com/p/evil-plus-evil-new-york-state-attorney
Thank you for the excellent graphene review. I've been following this metal in terms of its usage in nanovaccinology which is found in the literature. Harms have been reported here: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1583/aa5476. I am trained in live blood analysis and it appears that we have seen some structures that look like GO, but without a chemical breakdown, I cannot say definitively. I do believe heavy metal binders should be taken as a precaution. I think we've all learned how trustworthy the Pharma cartel is.
I would appreciate your take on this paper if you would...Always looking for better understandings.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/tnnq4ftw818chmx/FINAL_VERSIÓN_CAMPRA_REPORT_DETECTION_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES.pdf?dl=0
Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid
ASSOCIATE UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR
PhD in Chemical Sciences
Degree in Biological Sciences
Seems this man is a point on expert required for this sort of analysis..
How about adding to this dr. Robert Young's work as an expert in electronic microscopy and spectroscopy... https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines
Also, most interesting, same as La Quinta Columna and other brave doctors (three at least known to have been killed) dr. Young discusses the convergence with 5G/ 4G radiation which promotes the movement of graphene, the self assembling of nanoparticles and the amplification of frequencies from GHz to THz (6G domain). The associated research that can be found for free regarding the use of graphene for drug delivery, neuronal interface, intra body sensory network etc is overwhelming.
This page contains a partial list of the doctors and researchers who support the idea of graphene's presence in the jabs and some other useful references: https://unitefortruth.online/covid-vaxx-ai-control
There's a few points of most common sense in this theory of graphene's presence in the injections... One is the experimental scientific proof using adequate devices such as dr. Pablo Campra, dr. Robert Young, dr. Antonietta Gatti and dr. Rob Verkerk & team (at least) have done. Another is the huge amount of available literature showing that graphene is and can be further used for drug delivery and intra body control of cells in living organism corelated with the great industrial developments around graphene (see for example Graphene Flagship to which Astrazeneca is a known member). Then the related toxicity studies of graphene which cover the entire range of the most important side effects of the injections - and kind of all when adding the microwave sickness effects (that are multiplied by graphene's EMF conductivity and amplification). In matters of the supposed graphene in the jabs' interaction with the blood there are again experimental studies that corelate with actual science on this issue.
Finally and morally speaking, the most important argument: the reality of some experts being killed shortly after speaking publicly on this subject and the curtain of silence surrounding the subject from all existent authorities indicating a huge risk for all those daring to speak out that is obviously known and assumed by them.
But anyway, if this world would have only heroes we would not call them heroes, but just normal human beings, isn't it?
P.S. Thank you very much Nod for your contribution here... agree with all your observations
Again circumstantial, however nano has been found previously in most major vaccines, as these scientists, who found in the following study https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro--and-nanocontamination.html had their office raided by police
Thanks for putting this together Sasha. It is quite difficult finding info on graphene, other than that video of Dr. Noack circulating around. I wouldn't want that "mesh" in my blood, but for now I still assume we all have it inside us somehow. Why I believe energy medicine, biogeometry (Dr. Karim) prayer is the final frontier in healing.
https://principia-scientific.com/study-dangerous-nano-particles-contaminate-most-vaccines/
Thanks for those references, I wasn't conned by covid jabs, but am regretting previous vaccines I took without thinking
We were all fooled at one point or another. We were educated into a ("leave it to beaver mentality that trusted authority" ) that sustained for decades.
25 years ago a close friend died couple of days after a vaccine.
I learned from that and never took another.
An extremely talented musician and artist died for what I see now as a "big pharma junkie" culture. To capitalize on addiction to drugs. Mandated addictions are best I guess.
They have always treated us like garbage for disposal.. Flouride poison in the water for absolutely ZERO benefit. EMF toxicity they refuse to study, because you cannot find what you do not look for. Calling us criminal because we prefer the peace of marijuana over the brain damage and social harm of alcohol.
9/11, 2001, I learned we were at war with .01%
Jan 1, 2020 we lost. When we allowed unelected public health authorities to MURDER people with toxshots, lockdowns and coercion, in the interest of the .01 %
Now they are building the jails in which we will live .( CBDC, IHR, 15 minute cities, tracking)
And 25 years later, they still call this Great Reset as conspiracy theory, in ognorance of the objective presense just a quick search away. They use conspiracy theory as ad hom as they were taught to via propaganda. Without understanding that one uses conspiracy theory, in order to find conspiracy fact. Ask any public prosecutor.
So until they impose the CBDC, and the IHR, this is conspiracy theory. As soon as they impose these jails on us, it is conspiracy fact.
Fait accompli, IMO, but we will see, and not before long.
Look at twitter, all awash with lab leaks, masks, and the leucotomy called politics. While few have a clue about the jails being built around us.
Absolutely Nod, took this to wake me up, uni biology from 30 years ago made my alarm bells ring when they casually mentioned they were using mRNA (and DNA vector vaccines), no one knows enough to be interfering with that complex, delicate and fundamentally important system... No one ...
Since then I can just see it all, clear as day, the corrupt and the useful idiots, all pushing us towards a prison. Most love going with the crowd, even when you point out the obvious, a lot of people will say "I prefer not to think about it, my anxiety" or "but they wouldn't do that", problem is "they" ARE doing it, in front of your face, the word conspiracy exists for a reason, people conspire all the time...
The "soft" introduction of 15 minute cities, as a "trial"... You do not spend money on infrastructure for a "trial"... The line after the "trial" run will be it was so wildly successful that council (or the powers that be) have decided to impliment this trial full time... Making (insert your local area's name here) one of the greenest carbon neutral places on earth... Don't worry we'll only do this until the climate emergency is over... (Oh dear the climate emergency will never be over... Climate of course will always change due to many factors)...
Within a generation if this is allowed to proceed the grandchildren will never know a time when there wasn't a climate emergency, they will wonder what type of climate their ancestors lived in back when everything was okay... If only they knew that nothing has really changed and they're been fooled by an illusion...
They'll be used to a loss of bodily autonomy, where people are forced or conned to take a poison that will kill and injure them... and not save anyone.
They'll be living a sci fi movie (those that are left)...
Same here Steve...same here. You're not alone, you're in this together (: ha
Thanks for links. Prayer is powerful!
Absolutely! Definitely underrated.
Ah. Like Teflon cookware then…
Which sometimes flakes off and you end up eating it.
Teflon likely carcinogen when ingested; similarly various metals injected into the human body!
The EU is burning unused vials.
I think that's destruction of evidence.
They are making room to buy more because when people allow the pirates to take over, extortion and plunder is what they get.
The question of what was in those vials is important, but also the question of when they started to mass produce that crap. Was it in 2019, 18, or even earlier?
Will the masses ever be told that the products were designed and manufactured before they invented the disease and the virus?
I remember one conjecture that appeared a few months ago: the oldest lots are expired and don't kill people as much as the fresher lots of product.
How long does the LNPs last sitting in those vials?
I have sachets of industrial mayo sauce in the freezer since 2011, Can I sell them on ebay as WMDs or are they completely harmless by now and ebay will refuse to sell a fraud, unlike Queen Ursula and family?
This science of manufacturing the "small jewelry" that are proteins is both impressive and extremely dumb.
Like making plastic jewelry imitations that look better than the very expensive things, but no one wants them and is a complete waste of work and energy.
People should not be killed over junk designed to decorate the stage that backs up the greatest financial heist in history.
Sasha you are a force to be reckoned with..! a force for clarity and clear Communication of this complex and vitally important subject matter.. Thank you for knocking it out of the park, continuously! Like I said before You are a Bad Rad Momma!
Graphene Oxide and Graphene Hydroxide. I'd appreciate insights from medical types who wish to weigh in on what they believe about this study of their use in vaccines, and to correct any mistakes I've made in interpreting it. We know from this 2018 study that graphene had already been identified as a promising adjuvant in vaccines prior to CV and OWS. But it had serious safety concerns. That led them to experiment with different types of coatings and sizes that balanced safety and durability. Seems to be a precursor to the Pfizer study above.
Because of the properties of graphene it is able to increase the uptake of a substance into the body. It penetrates blood cells to deliver the drug inside, evade a cell's defenses. It can also be delivered directly to an organ inside the body which acts as a magnet to attract more graphene and build scaffolding there for implants to be created, allowing for novel targeted treatments. But this isn't done without risk of injury. They have been experimenting with ways to use the best properties of graphene for increased pharmaceutical uptake without inducing known injury. They try different coatings to prevent injury, but the coatings make graphene less effective, they pass through the system faster without as much uptake.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328338305_Graphene_Oxide_Touches_Blood_In_Vivo_Interactions_of_Bio-Coronated_2D_Materials
"Due to the sharp edges of GO and rGO, hemolytic effects might be expected in vivo, possibly caused by nanomaterial blades disrupting cell membranes, as reported for GO interactions with bacteria.
Feng and colleagues discovered RBC morphological alterations and aggregation above 100 mg mL1 and hemolytic effects
above 10 mg mL1 reaching 96% at 500 mg mL1. Lower hemolytic concentrations have been reported by other groups.
Small GO flakes (few hundreds of nm) seem to be more destructive."
"Hemostasis cascade prevents blood loss from injured tissue and maintains blood fluidity. The final hemostasis is driven by
platelets, which form the clot, a mixture of red blood cells, aggregated platelets, fibrin and other cellular elements (Fig. 3-2b).
If the clot forms abnormally, it can induce thrombosis.
Thrombogenicity is an important feature evaluated in nanomaterial design for in vivo delivery and represents the propensity to induce blood clotting and induce occlusion of a blood vessel by a thrombus."
"Furthermore, nanoparticles engineered to have longer systemic circulation times increase the likelihood of contact with blood components including the coagulation system, with thrombogenicity risks."
"When administered in vivo (250 mg kg1 body weight), 48% of lung vessels were partially occluded after 15 minutes"
"Biodistribution and biosafety of GO: future challenges
The focus of this review is the GO interaction with blood components and BC in light of the future design of GO pharmaceutical delivery systems. Intravenously injected drug delivery systems (DDS) developed so far include PEGylated nanographene sheets for tumor passive targeting, rGO functionalized with chitosan and iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles for the delivery of doxorubicin and epidermal growth factor receptor antibody-conjugated PEGylated nanographene oxide for epirubicin delivery in tumors.
Nanoparticles intended for drug delivery applications are being engineered to reduce their clearance and extend systemic
circulation times and thus increase the opportunity for targeted delivery. However, the disadvantage of prolonged circulation times is the greater chance of interaction with blood components and activation of adverse effects.
Before any nanomaterial translation into clinical therapy, there are biosafety concerns that need to be addressed. We have
seen how GO interacts with blood system components and how BC can influence these interactions, but what is the biodistribution and the toxicity when GO is administered intravenously"
"The early study of Zhang and colleagues determined the distribution and biocompatibility of i.v. injected GO in mice.
The half-life of GO in blood is much longer than in other carbon nanomaterials (B5 hours). Within 48 hours after i.v.
injection, GO is cleared from the bloodstream and distributed throughout various organs with preferred accumulation in the
lungs, liver, and spleen. The lack of pathological changes was reported after 14 days of treatment at a low dose (1 mg kg1
), Fig. 5 Illustration of the short-term effects of GONPs and rGONPs on THP-1 cells, and the long-term effects on THP-1a differentiation from THP-1 cells. GONPs and rGONPs could have induced ROS formation and activated the NF-kB pathway in THP-1 cells. rGONPs could not fully transcript proinflammatory genes due to lack of additional transcription factors but at a higher dose (10 mg kg1), granulomatous lesions, pulmonary edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis throughout the lung were observed. Many studies confirmed that the primary site of GO accumulation and toxicity in vivo is the lungs. It seems that the pathological effects on the lungs are proportional to the degree of dispersion and oxidation of GO."
"A systematic study on GO size, dose and dosing frequency was conducted by Liu and colleagues. Liu intravenously administered two types of GO: small GO flakes (s-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B250 nm) and large GO flakes (l-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B900 nm) at a single high dose (2.1 mg kg1) or seven repeated low doses (0.3 mg kg1); irrespective of size, the single high-dose administration of GO induced lung damage and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In the lungs, GO accumulated in the macrophages but not in the lymphocytes, which were recruited but were not able to trap GO. In this study, the authors claimed that although oxidative stress is a widely existent phenomenon in cells exposed in vitro to GO, the
protective effect of proteins forming a BC around GO should be considered in vivo.
Interesting size-dependent results were reported for multipledose exposure. The s-GO did not induce renal damage or accumulate in the kidneys since it was quickly eliminated through the glomeruli. Conversely, l-GO failed to be cleared
through kidneys and induced damage. The lungs were damaged only after multiple doses of l-GO. This effect depends on the
aggregation of GO with proteins that induce the blockage of large GO-complexes in the lungs. The hypothesis relies on the
formation of multiple complexes of l-GO and proteins that enter the capillaries and create multiple injury points and inflammatory cell recruitment. s-GO could instead pass through lungs capillaries after each low-dose administration. The kidneys and lungs were more damaged by l-GO, while the s-GO preferentially accumulated in the liver with toxic effects.
At a high single dose, s-GO can also damage the lungs since at high concentration it forms large complexes that reach a similar size to the l-GO protein complex"
"Finally, the degradation of injected GO is an important biosafety concern. Long-term interaction (14 days) of GO with plasma causes reduction and biodegradation with hole formation caused by the action of hydroxyl radicals. Once internalized by the immune cells, biodegradable particles are digested and cleared from the body, while non-biodegradable particles accumulate in cells for extended periods."
FF commentary: There's a lot of chemistry that informs us about the properties of graphene. It is a metal that develops some of the strongest bonds known to man. Graphene bonds in a honeycomb side-by-side coagulation of atoms, one-layer thick (one atom). Virtually indestructible. It's used on high performance brake pads, doesn't wear out. It has a very strong ionic charge that attracts and bonds with other graphene atoms in this configuration. Which makes for the sharpest nanorazor edges possible. An edge of a graphene knife one atom thick can cut through anything. Including blood cells and the inside of necessarily smooth blood vessels and internal organs it eventually embeds itself in. And when other graphene particles and flakes are present they are drawn to each other, growing in size. They become "scaffolding" that builds on itself. And fwiw, scaffolding is a lot like an antenna. For the more conspiratorial readers out there to infer the implications of.
Sasha I think the story in this article is when you mention not knowing what the vaccine is actually creating in the body.We thought spike protein?? But now it's and unknown substance.God help us!!
Sasha- I don’t understand why Karen Kingston takes every opportunity to attack you. It’s so ‘High School’.
You both do incredible work and should be collaborating to bring down the criminals. I know you don’t let it bother you, but I wanted you to know that I tried to defend you in her Comment section previously, and she still wrote another hit piece attacking you today. The many battles of infighting in The Truth Movement is not helping anybody.
Know that you have tons of support and we are grateful for your persistence, maturity and integrity. ❤️
I never participated in high school drama, and I am not planning to start now. I don't feel the need to attack anyone, since I am not threatened by or fearful of anyone, "in the movement" or outside of it. Besides, Karen blocks me on her substack so I can't read what she writes, lol.
I don’t know her personally but when I saw the graphene document behind her paywall, it just rubbed me the wrong way. Did not expect that kind of trivial greed from her. But coupled to what is mentioned here (the unnecessary drama, the blocking, and an attitude that comes across as petty professional jealousy) it seems I’ll have to re-evaluate how much I trust what she has to say.