This pattern of behavior by public health officials and the pharmaceutical industry is at least 40 years old and some of the very same people who were operatives 40 years ago were operatives in the CoVid era, most notably, but not limited to, Fauci.
Was there an intent to harm back then? It sure looks like it.
This pattern of behavior by public health officials and the pharmaceutical industry is at least 40 years old and some of the very same people who were operatives 40 years ago were operatives in the CoVid era, most notably, but not limited to, Fauci.
Was there an intent to harm back then? It sure looks like it.
Fauci was getting geared up to ram a smallpox vaccine down the throats of Americans (post 911) and there was talk about door-to-door compulsory vaccinations carried out by National Guard. Military involvement in US vaccine policy has a long history. They backed off because the catastrophic effect on trial subjects were too extreme and obvious to ignore.
Military involvement in vaccine promotion flows from early attempts to to reduce battlefield casualties from infectious diseases. (See the joint Pentagon-Rockefeller Institute race to create and rapid deploy vaccines for troops in WW I and then the public ) Then as biowarfare became a "thing" during WW II and biowarfare weapons were deployed afterwards (largely by the US), the need for developing g "countermeasures" of biological attacks came to the fore. https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/the-long-suppressed-korean-war-report-on-u-s-use-of-biological-weapons-released-at-last-20d83f5cee54
I think you will find that the idea of the military bypassing normal testing and manufacturing standards in vaccines "partnership" with commercial interests has a long history. WW I could be held up as an early example. The mass vaccination of troops heading to Iraq during the first Iraq war, which had catastrophic results and about which news was suppressed, is another.
IF Fauci & Co. believed the Wuhan virus was one of their weaponized viruses (which apparently they did until they shut down all conversation on the subject), the *logical* response (if you are a scientific idiot) would be to launch a massive countermeasure program. Of course, you'd have to lie about why you were doing it - which is how the Pentagon and Fauci & Company do everything . Also, once these interlocking bureaucratic machines is set in motion, they are formidable and hard to stop because they involve aggressive information suppression and propaganda (which is what the military uses expertly to "sell"every war.)
Finally, I think the "appeal" of mRNA is that an aggressor can create a bioweapon, rapidly develop and manufacture a countermeasure for your own troops and people, and get a temporary advantage on your opponent before they can develop countermeasures of their own. It's the dream of madmen.
This pattern of behavior by public health officials and the pharmaceutical industry is at least 40 years old and some of the very same people who were operatives 40 years ago were operatives in the CoVid era, most notably, but not limited to, Fauci.
Was there an intent to harm back then? It sure looks like it.
https://youtu.be/wy3frBacd2k?t=5345
https://youtu.be/wy3frBacd2k?t=3608
Fauci was getting geared up to ram a smallpox vaccine down the throats of Americans (post 911) and there was talk about door-to-door compulsory vaccinations carried out by National Guard. Military involvement in US vaccine policy has a long history. They backed off because the catastrophic effect on trial subjects were too extreme and obvious to ignore.
Military involvement in vaccine promotion flows from early attempts to to reduce battlefield casualties from infectious diseases. (See the joint Pentagon-Rockefeller Institute race to create and rapid deploy vaccines for troops in WW I and then the public ) Then as biowarfare became a "thing" during WW II and biowarfare weapons were deployed afterwards (largely by the US), the need for developing g "countermeasures" of biological attacks came to the fore. https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/the-long-suppressed-korean-war-report-on-u-s-use-of-biological-weapons-released-at-last-20d83f5cee54
I think you will find that the idea of the military bypassing normal testing and manufacturing standards in vaccines "partnership" with commercial interests has a long history. WW I could be held up as an early example. The mass vaccination of troops heading to Iraq during the first Iraq war, which had catastrophic results and about which news was suppressed, is another.
IF Fauci & Co. believed the Wuhan virus was one of their weaponized viruses (which apparently they did until they shut down all conversation on the subject), the *logical* response (if you are a scientific idiot) would be to launch a massive countermeasure program. Of course, you'd have to lie about why you were doing it - which is how the Pentagon and Fauci & Company do everything . Also, once these interlocking bureaucratic machines is set in motion, they are formidable and hard to stop because they involve aggressive information suppression and propaganda (which is what the military uses expertly to "sell"every war.)
Finally, I think the "appeal" of mRNA is that an aggressor can create a bioweapon, rapidly develop and manufacture a countermeasure for your own troops and people, and get a temporary advantage on your opponent before they can develop countermeasures of their own. It's the dream of madmen.