Yes so true. It is interesting what Pfizer, Moderna, etal moan about. For example the word Transfection is a "no,no" word. Likewise "gene therapy injectable" defined as a vaccine solely for the purpose of acceptance by the public. Its' actual name "gene therapy injectable" would have given most people pause. People would have waited sometime before taking the jab and by waiting find out the whole thing is likely a fraud.
One of the take aways is don't be rushed into taking something that is liability free. Walk slow and drink water.
In these 3 short tweets I say more of why we are 'hacking our own biofield' but not in the way fear thinks - more as the result of what fear does to our mind, perception and identity in response.
But it is also true that opportunism will milk fears as basis to sell anything not just to the public, but to investors seeking gain of function (self-boosting possession+control). Thus the patents and proposed applications for 'technologies of promise'.
Stakeholder cartels will then drive the hype by which to infect or hack the 'human animal' or witless compliance.
The materialist of opportunism downplays and disreagrds the psycho-spiritual - EXCEPTING as its own elite intellectual superiority (acted out on the body, bodies, & world).
Extreme examples make the systemic corruption easier to see (in our own thought as in our 'normalised currencies of exchange')
The intent to hack, undermine, possess and control others is very active on many levels-much of which is as I say 'normal' - but the concentration of wealth & leverage set by our current social priorities of value directs its vast resources on exactly such 'countermeasures' to perceived or projected (imagined) threat (risk).
EMF can be weaponised. The body may be made more or less susceptible via ingestion, injection or exposure to selected matters - that interact or resonate within specific EMF exposure.
War is an active if not the major driver of technological developments - including 'medical' stealth.
You’re calling out “self-assembly” but what about preassembled meals, ready to eat.- that fit through the barrel/eye of a needle..? Do they exist among the myriad dryads, monads and confabs - as well as alchemical metals and plasmids that make up tha vaxxx ingredient pyramid?
Right, that's why Yuval Harari talks about transhumanist crap non-stop, Google funded Ray Kurzweil with millions to promote this in his books, websites, movies, "science" and so forth. It's all because they DON'T want you to believe nanobots exist. That's why. LMAO.
But Harrari and Kurzwell are not what's being talked about in the video, are they? The video is referring to the covid countermeasures, aka covid vaccines, and I was referring to the fact that big pharma technocrats most decidedly DO NOT want people to think there is nanotech in their jabs.
follow Kevin McKernan's SS. It's slightly technical but you can shadow his work. He recently sequenced a mans colon tumor biopsy. It had the phizer sars cov sequence in the tumor. His team approached me in 2012 to collab on a project. He may entertain your question.
The biochemistry book I am reading states that each cell has 6 billion pairs of molecules. End for end, they would stretch for almost 12 feet/cell. It also says that we have 10 trillion cells (2014 version) but recently I ran across information claiming we have 37 trillion cells. Multiply that out and we see there are things so small you have to wonder how they can be seen.
The nanobot idea is a bit too far out there for me although I would not be shocked if it was true. Who really knows what these murdering clowns put inside vaccines and mRNA concoctions? Are they going to come clean and tell us? After 5 years, we are still exploring this and yet we still seem light years away from real answers.
The only possible action to take is to avoid all big pharma drugs as much as possible and seek safer and more proven alternatives to maintaining your health.
Robert Malone said in 2021, in the Dark Horse Podcast, "mice lie, monkeys mislead, and the only thing that can tell us what happens to a human is a human."
A common place in the pharmaceutical industry. They need experimentation on humans, and they don't want to pay the full price.
The inventions of Charles Lieber exist in the computer and in the lab. An animal body is not a computer and is not a lab.
Lots of things happen in reality that do not happen in textbooks and papers.
"Conan, what's the best in life, besides killing your enemies?
Ehrrr... ::Conan collects his thought to answer:: the best thing in life is making lots of money off killing your enemies!"
28 Jan 2020, Harvard Prof., Charles M. *Lieber was arrested, together with two Chinese nationals1, for selling military nanotech know-how to China. He was charged for not disclosing funding from Chinese government research programs at Wuhan University of Technology. 2 He had 100+ patents, especially nano-bio-electronics, funded by millions from NIH, DARPA, US Navy and US Army. At least, 11 Chinese patents. 3 Highlights:
• 2014 U.S. Patent about “electronic devices that can be injected or inserted into … biological tissue … through a syringe or a needle”. 4
• Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). 5
• “nanowire diode converts (cellphone) microwaves to electricity”. 6
• 2016 Using HIV to penetrate the cell (a reason why COVID includes HIV sequences): “biomimetic approach in which a cell penetrating peptide, the trans-activating transcriptional activator (TAT) from human immunodeficiency virus 1, is linked to the surface of Si nanowires to facilitate spontaneous internalization of nanowires into primary neuronal cells.” 7
• 2016 The nanowires “could record the electrical communication between structures inside the cell—signals passed from one organelle to another … could electrically stimulate those organelles for therapeutic purposes. Or could carry small molecule drugs and deliver them directly to cells, bypassing some of the body’s natural barriers. Cells consume the nanowires naturally, without any kind of special treatment, and without damaging themselves…” 8
In sum, Lieber’s work was essential towards the nano-routers to track the population and the basis for neuromodulation and 5G/cellphone brain interface, deployed with COVID injections.
I don't doubt the investment poured into such focus for research for application, not neglecting the stake of patent claim for striking 'gold'.
The idea of a Medical Operating system in the human mass-mind by which to run various 'applications' for gain of control functions, is already running as 'virology' and 'cancer' frameworks of securitised definitions, treatments and socially conditioning countermeasures.
All of which converge on Biotech - which is in fact its foundation all along; the technologising of biological models for marketing and weaponising or control function.
Science is supposed to stand on the shoulders of giants, as part of its 'sacred history', but errors, omissions and fraud of personal+corporate distortions set Thescience as begotten of giant mistakes - set into its foundations and deemed too big to fail - hence the culture of sacrifice to 'Save the System' - that has become our defence against every kind of evil - from the old plagues to a host of novel derivatives.
Discovering Biofield as an underlying energy matrix for biology has deep significance far beyond 'medical applications' or even technological explorations - but the stakeholders for a mindset of possession and control see only threat - (a sort of Herod -complex)- and so the true science is aborted while the funding shapes marketising and weaponising applications for GoF - regardless whether the claim of function is in fact running gain of fiction.
Working in vaccinnology will not question the predicates that shape, define and drive their research. No more will biotech research institutions - and nor by the way did those working on 'The Gadget' know what their work was being used for - and when they did - whether it was in fact as claimed.
Compartmentalised specialities can be manipulated unwitting while endeavouring to 'solve problems'.
So what's real and what's psyop?
That's a good question to hold before acting on false evidences appearing real.
One of my questions is; do enough people WANT the biotech future to manifest the basis for its frameworks as a matrix for a deeper dissociation from Intimacy of being - allowing that all trauma rises from loss of connection, trust and support - hence resort to defence-complex of social+cultural developments that mask over conflicts as if to forfend disaster.
For one thing, he did not invent mrna. His behavior of the past 4 years has been disgusting towards other professionals who really were trying to help. He is a malignant narcissist who used the whole covid atrocity for self aggrandizement. Do some digging, if you want to find it ypu will.
And he also tried to sue Dr. Jane Ruby and Dr. Peter Breggin. Malone is a fraud, and I saw it the first time I heard him speak about the "vaccines". I can't remember which platform but it was back in 2021 I believe.
"After 5 years, we are still exploring this and yet we still seem light years away from real answers."
How about 9/11? Twenty three years and counting. Still no REAL answers. Of course, anyone with an IQ of 100+ and the will to look at the mountains (yes, plural) of evidence understands that Israel did it.
In terms for getting to answers it might be helpful to understand Moncef Slaoui’s role regarding OWS. To confirm, Monsef S headed OWS and worked for GSK for 30 years as well as Moderna and Lonza who manufacturers the Moderna jabs. If the head of GSK vaccines headed up OWS it would seem that pharma was involved at some level. It would be great to see posts on Moncef and his role in pharma and OWS.
I wrote about Monsef, and I have first hand account of him. He wasn't an "evil planner" and definitely did not realize what DARPA was actually doing. Most of the regular participants in OWS did not, they really believed there was a pandemic, believed they were working hard to solve it, believed they had to ship doses by January or they will "miss the window" to vaccinate, and they were also all told that the doses were going to be only made available to "high-risk" people. They did not know the US DoD will start force injecting pregnant women and children and were horrified when they realized what is happening. Moncef was quickly removed, accused in some pretend sexual harassment charge and made to shut up and retire.
But Moncef was head of Operation Warp Speed and worked for GSK for 30 years in vaccines followed by Moderna and Lonza. This shows pharma involvement. It’s difficult to imagine that he would not be familiar with gene therapy and the risks of mRNA including risks of rushed scale up to produce these biologics.
"it shows pharma involvement" - this is the government buying stuff from pharma companies, duh, of course there is pharma involvement. Moncef was not familiar with what DARPA/DOD really intended to do. I know this for a fact.
Moncef was part of OWS for sure and probably did really think a deadly pandemic was possible. However we need to look at other individuals like Ralph Baric at UNC and his research which was certainly in the field as early as 2018. He has a number of interesting patents and apparently had comms with the Wuhan lab. He's never been asked to testify or answer any questions in front of any investigative committee. I have no idea if he had connections indirectly with DARPA or BARDA however he certainly had foreknowledge of a SARS type pandemic nearly 2 years before.
The "dancing israelis" were filming the 911 event and got caught. They were Mossad operatives but of course were let go by FBI. Later on in Israel on live TV they said they were documenting the event! it's hard to find on the internet, no surprise there. I have the video footage but that is plain as day a confession if ever i saw one.
The willingness to ask a real question will use every result to refine its questioning. Most questions are really statements in the form of a question. That is - they are loaded with false assumptions seeking validation, or terms and conditions that reality is supposed to meet.
What do we truly want to know?
Well clearly many different agendas running on may levels that include NOT wanting to know - and thus seeking for something by which to maintain 'shields up!' against what we are as yet unwilling or unready to accept. Psychosis can result from premature or forceful exposure.
Many want a story that can enable them to go back to sleep.
But the stories being fed them are more fearful than the process of owning conflict rather than seeking to scape it to anywhere anyone else. As a Call to heal - not to blame-sacrifice and war over 'who pays?'.
(I take your kind reply as a lens though which to consider the nature or rather mindset of denial)
The nature of denial is to operate a split mind under masking narrative.
So while I agree with you -I qualify that 'yes' by addressing grief or pain of loss at our root level - not in various pretexts of distributed mitigation.
Enthusiasm or joy in life is native or integral, but fear of pain of loss runs conditional to our current identity of active core beliefs and definitions.
In short our story sets rules and permissions for perception & response. This offers a selective past as the frame for our present as unfolding future, where the selection is in effect running blind as a default conditioning of survival strategies for adapting to and as a split mind or 'denial-mode'.
Denial-mode runs countermeasure to fear of revisiting trauma (hated-feared inner conflict or humiliations that associate with formative relational conflicts) - Fear of pain of loss.
So what is Acceptance of truth in terms of our perceptions of others?
If I cannot accept truth from you, must I project my 'version' onto you and react as real?
I don't write to muscular thinking at all! But to prompt or invite deeper curiosity of states where it seems 'everyone else is the problem', or just as blame-framing; 'I am the problem'.
The packaging of conflicts to 'external solutions' reiterates the 'problem' as a protected basis or framework for identity set on and validated by such 'solutions'.
Self-specialness runs a split or segregative mind as the right to judge & subdue the 'Other' as righteous sacrifice to the god set over and apart from life.
Terror gods run beneath the aychetype-ture of our psychic and cultural inheritance (no less our rational superstructure of a claim to define life as its laboratory or machine).
Fear miscreates in the mind of those who share in it.
without the light from another mind self-illusion would not be undone or healed at its root (or in truth).
But untruth never became truth -even though we suffer grievously under its claim of function, accepted as our own. So are 'denier and denied' bound by contract to accept 'something else' in place of truth at heart? We would have to imagine what that would be, and there's the creative, set in wishful or fearful thought, in which to be phished by its own image.
If you look at the fundamental questions that Harold Hillman asked of his stonewalling peers in biological science - and which were never answered - you might wonder how much of what has been assigned to cells and projected into them as various functions & apparatus is actually real - though it is defended as real by its investor base-which of course includes the mass mindshare to the 'worldview' framed in expert 'knowledge'.
The reality looks to me to be an energetic field phenomenon.
Much of what naturally occurs within Field dynamics is thus assigned to 'special attributes' of the entity - that can be claimed to break or fail such as to require boosting or replacement.
The ego is exactly that idea applied to the 'self' which we all think or act as if we know or understand, yet projects its conflicts onto all its relationships and suffers them 'unfairly'.
Believing is seeing. Thus to reevaluate belief allows renewal of vision from a wider perspective. But the nature of belief is to operate as a primary focus for perceiving, to which other witnesses are seen as interference, irritants or threats.
Interesting that a cell is a prison yet also a basis for a network of communication. I see that no less of a self; we can be transparatent to a field of communication or locked down and structured to block or attack communication.
That's the choice before me- whatever the story being run or sold.
Her presentation was a failure. She has done nothing to address the dark field microscopy structures that look nothing like cholesterol pictures she showed. She hasn't even looked.
Your bias against women also discredits you. This did not begin with Dr Ana. It began with men. Specifically, La Quinta Columna were here several months before Dr Ana appeared on the scene. Which is one of the reasons I think she is either paranoid or controlled op herself, due to her lack of scientific research for the conclusions she is promoting, she is well positioned to discredit the entire ‘nano’tech theory. It would be interesting to add her to the chart. Neither am I a fan of Dr Jane Ruby. The nanotech theory needs to be taken seriously and independently researched using proper scientific methods to disprove it, given the clearly articulated transhumanist agenda that includes the Internet of Bodies and the military R&D towards Super Soldiers. The problem for those that rely purely upon scientific evidence to prove anything and everything is that the scientific evidence has to be looked at in proper context taking into consideration the 30,000ft view, and not in isolation from global political, cultural and religious ideologies that drive and fund BigPharma.
Super Soldiers!!! LMAOOOOO! I was planning to write about the state of tech there, but was sidetracked. It's priceless comedy, really. Thanks for reminding about that bullshit.
As stated - but you seem to have missed the entire point Sasha that was referring to people such as yourself that entirely base their conclusions on scientific evidence to the exclusion of all other context - "The problem for those that rely purely upon scientific evidence to prove anything and everything is that the scientific evidence has to be looked at in proper context taking into consideration the 30,000ft view, and not in isolation from global political, cultural and religious ideologies that drive and fund BigPharma."
The problem with your postulation here (I should say Dr. Ulrich's) is that it doesn't fit with the Hollywood sci-fi dystopian scenario that I've been pre-programmed to latch on to.
Are you really suggesting that nanobots connecting my brain to the "Internet of Things" are not in these experimental injections that were foisted upon the public in response to a mysterious "lab leaked" pathogen? No it wasn't a love match between a bat and pangolin it was definitely a viral escapee that seeped out the window left open by a janitor. Didn't that subcommittee tell us this?
In any case I'm sorry but Ulrich's analysis doesn't cut it and frankly there's no room in the social media hysteria market for such ordinary tales. Are you trying to put Sigourney Weaver and Dennis Quaid out of work? Too late, the script has already been writ.
The alternative explanation is that these injections are really more of the same mass poisoning, albeit a teensy bit more toxic, and the Covid Con was just another mundane, albeit amped up a tad, mass medical homicide/mass fraud event visited upon the public by their own governments at the behest of the financial oligarchs that run the show.
Sorry but parroting such alt-dissident evidence-based explanations will not get you invited to the next big pow-wow sponsored by the Wellness Company. Not to mention your chances for a cameo in the upcoming Weaver/Quaid pandemic blockbuster have just been reduced to net zero.
I know, I know- Elon is the man behind the curtain- so very smart even as he sounds like an entitled frat boy I know he is always playing eleventh-dimensional chess.
Hopefully Elon my boy doesn't run out of lithium any time soon. How else we gonna fund those mRNA factories?
Shit, gotta go, I see my Tesla is smoldering in the driveway.
I worked on hydrogen engine project (as a consultant analyst) for GM right out of school, many years ago. This was one of the very few non-pharma things I did. The tech is not easily scalable for vehicles, but can be used in stationary power generation easily. However, it has been suppressed in favor of all the green bullshit scams, including Tesla. Maybe Toyota will actually make it work.
I think they can make it work Sasha. They are currently racing it. Time will tell. Sadly I believe there will be a lot of econmic pressure to keep the motor Toyota is working on out sight and out of mind.
I must say that I am truly grateful for all of your postings during the last few years. Having a scientific background myself, I find your approach to the covid issue very refreshing. As well, I love your artistic presentations! Thank you so much.
Go back and listen closely. Compare her pictures of cholesterol with the dark field microscopy footage. The only thing achieved is denial, wishful thinking, and drinking more koolaid.
It's a great work of love to help to dispel myths.
Lots of people suffer anxiety with many myths about this.
I know that some will never stop believing or promoting this fear propaganda. In some cases, because it's their job: chaos agents.
In other cases, because conned people, the victims of a massive fraud, develop an emotional connection with their controllers. Almost religious.
People demand that politicians must be willing to admit error (masks, distancing, injections) and to admit to having committed atrocious crimes and having used terrorist techniques to manipulate people.
Both are difficult: people rarely admit crimes or treason to their country, and they are also specialists in scapegoating.
But anyone who wants to know what is real should demand from themselves to be willing to admit error about nanobots in this terror campaign. To continue to push this means opening a huge door for politicians to escape through.
At some point, the last thing to do coincides with the honorable thing to do, which is to admit error and apologize.
The Nanobot Cult Leader, is none other than Boris Johnson!
In his 'Robot Chicken UN Speech 2019' (literally titled such), he let the vax out the bag, so to speak, that something was coming that damned Anti-Vaxxers the scourge of Science Deniers that they are, would pose a pesky threat to.
He lauded over false pro vaxx nonsense of curing Smallpox etc and then jumped straight to ...wait for it...NANOBOTS... "smaller than a red blood cell, swimming your veins to fix your liver!". Then he went to smart dust and smart sewers, right up to Neural Implants reading minds and future Alexas/Googles, that would know your every thought and chastise you!
He then promised UK would lead the way on all this claptrap and safeguards, to ensure a Utopia, not Dystopian Nightmare!
Then swanned off stage to get pissed up laughing, as he handed the Country to the globalists Covid SCAM.
This clip, has been DOCTORED now, to swap all the correct order of the speech, as it was too obvious once people found it during early covid. I have both versions.
So the Cult NANOBOT Leader, is Boris himself! Implying the future vaccines would contain such tech.
Feel free Sasha to punch him squarely in the face and kick him in the nuts, as he is responsible for all the Cultists that plagued your substack chat! ;)
That narrative is not created by Johnson, he was just repeating it. The nanobot fixing the liver is Ray Kurzweil/Google (Sergei Brin, +Musk + Theil, etc.) that crowd actually believes this bullshit. At least some of them do.
Fair enough Sasha, I was unaware of whom he was referencing. I merely meant Boris planted such idea pre "Covid" scam and the Vaxes even being mentioned, let alone suspected of nano-tech clap trap, clung to vehemently by the cultists now. I find his speech interesting, as it literally lays out the CovidScam ahead of time, showing clear foreknowledge. He should be in jail, as should they all, not releasing new books for Christmas!
you can keep open mind, but again, if you were hounded with extreme aggression, like I am every time I tell people nanobots are bullshit, you would quickly realize the aggressives are a cult.
A cultic identity forms around a self-certainty drawn against evil.
When Jesus said "Resist YE not evil" he was wise to the liability of assuming the role of God's Holy Warrior.
Bringing all to truth - even the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune - allows a discernment of grounded practical wisdom - else we become cultic by staking our to our countermeasures as The Right to get rid of enemies while making virtue credits.
Mothers who think the vax saves their children from death and disease can become extremely hostile to suggestions that the vax harms them. There's a way of it. Because its 'all coming out anyway' I feel to say things I would not previously - but still not from a right to tell others the truth!
This is an ongoing learning for me. Where do I choose to stand? I side with freedom - which includes learning from our choices as freedom to make better choices- toward real choice instead of false framed binary.
But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
Because they want this story, they probably even pay for this story to circulate as it helps them to point, laugh, and say that all anti-vaxxers are cranks that think they have nanobots inside... I don't blame them for this...
I agree: I early observed that some of the wilder and more insane 'predictions' on the WEF websire, for instance, were placed there precisely to make anti-vaxxers look foolish when repeated.
'Putting everyone refusing in camps to murder them' - logistically impossible! - was circulated for the same reason.
2020-22 showed us that all that is needed to control minds and kill is 1/ TV, and 2/ poisonous injections and deadly hospital protocols.
I don't either. Sad that we are so mindless and uncritical that we swallow nano bots hook line and sinker.
Honestly I didn't know. Curious about that info. But didn't need to know as I didn't get jabbed.
The story of bots is one more hole to go down. These guys are not that good. They are good at snow jobs apparently. If then number of people believing in that nonsense is accurate.
I say apparently because the general US population's intelligence has been tanking for the last 50 years. Now we believe nearly everything. If we don't believe, we accept because we are to lazy to dig.
Love your work and art. I recognize many of the landscapes from the Napa Valley region. I lived in the North Coast region of California for about 30s. Left in the 2000s as Napa and Sonoma regions became watering holes for the rich.
I appreciated your sweet and professional demeanor during your presentation. However, I was disappointed by the derogatory comments you made about Dr. Ana Mihalcea. It would be more beneficial to maintain a respectful tone and refrain from using offensive language when addressing individuals who may have differing perspectives on the information presented.
I have no interest in Ana or you or your cult. YOU come to MY page and make derogatory comments and expect me to be sweet and professional in return? Get a clue, lady.
Then actually address the darkfield microscopy footage instead of using a presentation the does nothingvti compare, is not comparable, bears no resemblance whatsoever.
First you should address that nanobots are not visible under a MICROscope. LMAO. Yeah, that.... after this maybe people will take you a little more seriously.
But you are only providing a presentation that is like comparing apples and oranges. Again. Instead of actually addressing the darkfield microscopy images. You never do.
And this is the entire problem with your position. You emotively abuse people with derogatory comments and attempt to dismiss without providing actual science. All I am looking for are actual microscopy experts that can provide the scientific evidence that there is no nano - or MICRO - bots (whatever, I don't care the point is they are not visible with the naked eye so arguing semantics on this point is irrelevant and a distraction that enables you to further make flippant comments that are derogatory abuse). You are not a microscopy expert, so the question is why do you even weigh in on this topic as though you are? Furthermore, you persistently ignore and dismiss the patents that actually prove intent, regardless of your assumption that they are not capable of manufacturing these 'inventions'. Nevertheless, you assume that your knowledge is beyond the limits of the Trueman Show or The Matrix, when in fact you are captive within it. You have no knowledge of top secret classified projects, of USDoD or DARPA Black Ops projects, AND you assume that all is in plain sight. How can you be so foolish as to believe that they have shown you their entire hand of cards? Look at the evil that has mandated these bioweapon injections across the entire planet. I like your work, I have always been impressed, but on this topic I can only conclude you are either in denial or a gatekeeper. Show me the SCIENCE. Show me any microscopy expert that can refute in scientific detail, the microscopy footage that has been collated by La Quinta Columna. Interesting that NONE of you that attempt to disregard the nanotech theory, EVER provide any evidence to refute La Quinta Columna. Instead. you attempt to refute by providing a PhD that only compares with Cholesterol. And not even comparing and contrasting under darkfield microscopy. I call this approach manipulative perception management. Science is supposed to be debate, not character assassinate through derogatory comments and rapid dismissal of views that cause you cognitive dissonance or are harmful to your agenda. The death of science is happening right here on your Substack. And Science needs to understand that Politics - including cultural and religious belief systems - are also a part of this agenda. I called out USDoD on social media months before you and Katherine Watt joined the dots, so thankyou for confirming my conclusions. I called them out as Psychopaths and Narcissists several weeks before Dr Reiner Fuellmich or anyone else on Social Media, and now people can see that this is what we are dealing with. To date throughout this plandemic, I have been 100% correct. And I have been biting my tongue for long enough.
OMG. Can you list some more hate and injustice that happened to you? Why are you still not famous with all this amazing knowledge that you have? And who is making you bite your tongue? Are you safe? Blink twice if you need me to call 911.
COMPOUND MICROSCOPES HAVE RESOLUTION DOWN TO 250 nanometers
Compound microscopes, on the other hand, rely on visible light and are limited by the wavelength of light (approximately 400-700 nanometers). This restricts their ability to resolve features smaller than about 250 nm.
Their compound scopes only have resolution down to 200-250nano meters. Out of the1000nano meters. The scopes see >75% of nano structures with a MICROscope. Except sub 200nm particles.
I have firmly stated my position. There are no nano robots in the Jim Juices or dental juices. The formations being touted by the whole world as nano routers are SALT!!! But, there is ABSOLUTELY nano technology in the vx vails. Everything i say here is scientifically correct and replicable science.
These believers in nanobots detract from the credibility of the research of others who are trying to describe what happens when the mRNA jabs are injected into a human. Not fair to lump them together with the rest of the anti-RNA jabbers.
There are two cults actually. There is the death cult that unleashed the slow kill bio weapon, and then there is the cult that was created after 3/11/2020, the Branch Covidians, easily identified wearing light blue face diapers.
Yes! Branch Covidians! Was 3/11/2020 the date that masking was initiated? The only issue I have with the name is that really it began long before that....when those who follow along would not analyze or want to think about or care about the issues of pedophilia, Bohemian Grove, Epstein and the Deep State, the harm to the children and how to stop it.
3/11/2020 was the day that Bill Gates' hand-picked-for-the-job former President of Ethiopia and overseer of a genocide, WEF Gen. Sec. Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus declared a global pandemic.
The amazing pristine fact is that Sasha has become the no pretense no nonsense absolute voice of integrity...though we have ...zero confidence in rfk Jr..but overall Sasha shines like the Sun in her strength.We see quite clearly that she is in the forefront of pushing the changes of the the Overton window..let her go on to greater and greater achievements..she may *sound*strident*but look at the tidal wave s of obscurantist.s.....statists..and the..toadie advocates of biopharmakeia...Sasha has been directly over the target for some time...no doubt new information and new victories will emerge because She did so veryvwell.well....funalky..there is in America especially on the internet..a scorching cut your head off purity test vibe...pray for Her to win..because if she wins...we all will win**Be sure if it...**Be intuitive not flat minded monochromatic dogmatists..all of us need to see the final. end of scientific dictatorship....** the end of the..monster mash..scientism..the final eradication of the graveyard smash new ..lyshenkoism.. ..... . Sasha doesn't have to pretend to be JESUS CHRIST to be damn good..just...the way she is.....jus sayin...
Not just any obstetrician, that doctor from the research was a fertility doctor. Her job for decades has been counting sperm cells and evaluationg their mobility and write dossiers that say the client is 75% infertile and they need to buy a fertility treatment from the clinic, such as in vitro fertilization.
Kind of biased, if you ask me.
The linguist guy looks to me like a political activist seeking an opening to land in some paltry legislative position. It's almost an archetype!
I read the paper when it appeared in the substack space. People were so excited: the ribbons, the ball-chain. Definitive proof, they said. I refrained from attacking personalities then. I argued against the data. Then the nutjobs attacked my personality, by telling me: "you're a gatekeeper, you're a shill."
Obviously, the two authors of the paper, the Korean Doctor and the Canadian Linguist (I think he was Canadian? maybe I remember wrong) didn't attack my personality, nor did they tell the people on substack to attack the heretics. They did that on their own. So it's unfair that I attack them now. I should attack the trolls instead.
Therefore, I apologize to the Obstetrician/fertility expert, and to the Linguist fellow.
Considering the large number of manufacturing operations utilized for 'vaccine' production and the apparent lack of quality assurance, one should expect a vast array of detritus that might be found in the final products. As well, knowing the point of this diabolical operation, we can also expect a huge variety of toxic products implemented just to see what kinds of damage could be observed on the human population.
Thank you. It's about time. I've been eyeing suspiciously the nanobot, etc. talk for quite some time now, noting the names of the main promoters, and pretty much avoiding them like the plague. The problem is, they never offer real evidence of their claims. Micrographs and patents alone, mixed or not with scare talk, aren't evidence.
I worked in the semiconductor industry in the past, and I have seen plenty of micrographs of micro- if not nanotechnology (it's down to nano now), and it didn't look like that at all. If somebody is going to truthfully claim that something is nanotechnology, wouldn't it make sense to have somebody who actually works with nanotechnology weigh in on the matter? I have yet to see that, although I'm not even looking any longer. It looks like a complete waste of time.
Having someone who works closely with lipids weigh in on it does make sense. Again, thank you.
Go to my posts. you will see me refute the nano BS with better microscopy skills than anyone of these charlatans on SS. I can't even call it loose science what they do. All the formations they call circuits are sodium ion crystallography. I just started SS but not science.
Looks interesting, and I have your blog bookmarked for follow-up. Thank you.
I haven't prepared a slide or used a microscope myself since 1969 (college), although I grew up having and using microscopes, but I think I could do better than these folks. "That one looks like a wire!" And it somehow becomes a wire -- and obviously part of self-assembling circuitry, just like in the patents. How about finding micro rainbow ribbon cables with self-joining terminations? That would be pretty.
I guess they haven't had a good look at a semiconductor junction.
I have proof of what the so called "NANO Robots" are... promoted by the controlled conditioned herd. Go look at my post calling out Dr Ana, Dr Young, i am just getting started calling out the charlatans w my lab skills.
Especially the stupid doctors dripping with Dunning-Kruger level academic smug.
THERE ARE NO NANO ROBOTS IN THE VX OR DENTAL SOLUTIONS!!!
But.......There is absolutely nano technology in the VX vials. Anyone that says there isn't is a bombastic simpleton....Such as Sasha here. This is very easy to refute with a brief look into the mrna platform. What's in a name? BioNtech??
So anyone saying there is no nano tech in vx is stupid or purposefully misleading you
Why does bill Gates say "we have a lot of new nano particles that are very self assembly. We just need to play with them some more" End Quote from Bill Gates
Also Sasha doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about regarding using highly analytical lab equipment. Much less a microscope from goodwill. She claims you can't see >250nano meters with a compound microscope.
Good compound microscopes have a resolution down to >250nanometers This is seeing in the mid nano level range. She is wrong
Science is very easy to fake. Ask Bill. Just lie through skewed, altered statistics.
What these "Dr" presenters present to the herd. Most in the herd 99% are not scientific sleuths able to critically analyze these flimsy, dubious claims.
THE CLAIMED NANO ROBOTS????
The other simpleton Drs haven't figured out and reproduced the science, that they are absolutely sodium ion crystallography being expressed during the droplet evaporative phase in all the liquid injectables. This is because all the liquid solutions contain sodium. This sodium is added as an isotonic stabilizer to keep an osmotic balance in bodily fluids and tissues.
Go to my post and you will see that Dr Ana is the over the top controlled alex jones type co/op. DR ANA SAYS SHE'S BEEN A SPACESHIP!!
This way if you mention nano anything. Many will say it's woo woo and write it all off.
Then you have opposite conclusions from other uninformed stupid humans called doctors such as this doctor lady who lives in a scientific vacuum of her own. She only knows what she knows. She is likely vaccinated as well.
She was looking at protein crystallography as well.
Idiots agreeing with other idiots is a big problem for humanity, but it is how you keep them blind to all angles.
I jumbled my terminology in my first comment, and started to correct it in my reply to you but then decided that it would only sound confusing. LNPs are nanotechnology, and I wouldn't be bothered by these Drs. you mention just by their using that term, if that were the only way they used it, but it's not, as you noted. I noticed what said Drs. were up to when I first came across them.
I don't demand perfection from the authors I follow, but I do look for quality.
I agree Peter 100%... We can all agree these shots are depopulation bioweapons! No doubt about it. And others who don't believe this... are part of the 'Normie cult'... ... the "nothing to see here" cult... the "maybe it wasn't so bad" cult. NOT! It was very BAD, and everyone knows it.
Carol posted a genuine lovely sympathetic and very human ..really thoughtful comment.No bile..no invective...no ad hominems....how refreshing......God bless .
Except people will think we are trying to sell injectable robots into the penis(ding dong). Tech Treatments for erectile dysfunction. Or implanted hand sensors that ring peoples door knobs.
Either way Elon would be interested in buying the start up. Then you will REALLY be called controlled opposition! Working in pharma with the big E of the endless line of credit!!! And Elon can keep it up long enough for 11 more kids and 3 more wives. OMG i’m dying laughing.
Here’s a nice rabbit hole, 40 years of pushing diesel engine cars onto us, key pollutant is graphite derivatives, it gets into everything as it’s airborne. The graphene in jabs is a hydroxide so acts as a seed crystal to make graphite sheets with sharp hydroxy edges, worse than asbestos and self forming in the right conditions, not nanobots at all but not good for you all the same. Another simple poison like fluoride and the rest of the crap they inject.
Look up top-hat DNA if you want to see how complex we really are and how impractical or impossible gene manipulation with our current tech probable is, we still base everything on blot testing and stats, none of it is accurate. (No references sorry, sitting in the sun reading comments on my phone and thinking)
If you are a chemist. You realize your hypothesis is plausible. I worked in genomics and other fields. If you go to my SS and read up you will agree your hypothesis is wrong on what is currently happening in these liquid solutions during the sessile droplet evaporation phase.
It seems incredible that we have to justify that there are no 'nanobots' in the vials.
I am sure the technocrats are happy to let people think there are.
It also detracts from all the dangerous 'elements' that are actually present!
Yes so true. It is interesting what Pfizer, Moderna, etal moan about. For example the word Transfection is a "no,no" word. Likewise "gene therapy injectable" defined as a vaccine solely for the purpose of acceptance by the public. Its' actual name "gene therapy injectable" would have given most people pause. People would have waited sometime before taking the jab and by waiting find out the whole thing is likely a fraud.
One of the take aways is don't be rushed into taking something that is liability free. Walk slow and drink water.
As an intuition of symbolic recognition it is a bulls-eye. But the 'empirical & technological' assumptions for its story are false.
https://x.com/onemindinmany/status/1865377795192295632
In these 3 short tweets I say more of why we are 'hacking our own biofield' but not in the way fear thinks - more as the result of what fear does to our mind, perception and identity in response.
But it is also true that opportunism will milk fears as basis to sell anything not just to the public, but to investors seeking gain of function (self-boosting possession+control). Thus the patents and proposed applications for 'technologies of promise'.
Stakeholder cartels will then drive the hype by which to infect or hack the 'human animal' or witless compliance.
The materialist of opportunism downplays and disreagrds the psycho-spiritual - EXCEPTING as its own elite intellectual superiority (acted out on the body, bodies, & world).
Extreme examples make the systemic corruption easier to see (in our own thought as in our 'normalised currencies of exchange')
The intent to hack, undermine, possess and control others is very active on many levels-much of which is as I say 'normal' - but the concentration of wealth & leverage set by our current social priorities of value directs its vast resources on exactly such 'countermeasures' to perceived or projected (imagined) threat (risk).
EMF can be weaponised. The body may be made more or less susceptible via ingestion, injection or exposure to selected matters - that interact or resonate within specific EMF exposure.
War is an active if not the major driver of technological developments - including 'medical' stealth.
You’re calling out “self-assembly” but what about preassembled meals, ready to eat.- that fit through the barrel/eye of a needle..? Do they exist among the myriad dryads, monads and confabs - as well as alchemical metals and plasmids that make up tha vaxxx ingredient pyramid?
I'm also sure the the technocrats are happy to let people try to convince us there are no nanobots.
Right, that's why Yuval Harari talks about transhumanist crap non-stop, Google funded Ray Kurzweil with millions to promote this in his books, websites, movies, "science" and so forth. It's all because they DON'T want you to believe nanobots exist. That's why. LMAO.
But Harrari and Kurzwell are not what's being talked about in the video, are they? The video is referring to the covid countermeasures, aka covid vaccines, and I was referring to the fact that big pharma technocrats most decidedly DO NOT want people to think there is nanotech in their jabs.
Got that?
I'd rather question the basis of claim for mRNA transciption - in fact the whole field of genomics as running out of a black box.
By reacting to fears, we invest emotion and identity to become a stakeholder in the psyop or deceit.
In a chaos or pandemonium any claim can be weaponised and marketised by opportunism.
I wont tell anyone what they need to do.
But invite stopping-pausing from reaction to really chack in with the true need of our being.
Without truth (self-honesty) everything goes to shit - even if you make out of it for a while in ways that seemed good at the time.
follow Kevin McKernan's SS. It's slightly technical but you can shadow his work. He recently sequenced a mans colon tumor biopsy. It had the phizer sars cov sequence in the tumor. His team approached me in 2012 to collab on a project. He may entertain your question.
The biochemistry book I am reading states that each cell has 6 billion pairs of molecules. End for end, they would stretch for almost 12 feet/cell. It also says that we have 10 trillion cells (2014 version) but recently I ran across information claiming we have 37 trillion cells. Multiply that out and we see there are things so small you have to wonder how they can be seen.
The nanobot idea is a bit too far out there for me although I would not be shocked if it was true. Who really knows what these murdering clowns put inside vaccines and mRNA concoctions? Are they going to come clean and tell us? After 5 years, we are still exploring this and yet we still seem light years away from real answers.
The only possible action to take is to avoid all big pharma drugs as much as possible and seek safer and more proven alternatives to maintaining your health.
Robert Malone said in 2021, in the Dark Horse Podcast, "mice lie, monkeys mislead, and the only thing that can tell us what happens to a human is a human."
A common place in the pharmaceutical industry. They need experimentation on humans, and they don't want to pay the full price.
The inventions of Charles Lieber exist in the computer and in the lab. An animal body is not a computer and is not a lab.
Lots of things happen in reality that do not happen in textbooks and papers.
"Conan, what's the best in life, besides killing your enemies?
Ehrrr... ::Conan collects his thought to answer:: the best thing in life is making lots of money off killing your enemies!"
From the movie "The New Order of Barbarians"
28 Jan 2020, Harvard Prof., Charles M. *Lieber was arrested, together with two Chinese nationals1, for selling military nanotech know-how to China. He was charged for not disclosing funding from Chinese government research programs at Wuhan University of Technology. 2 He had 100+ patents, especially nano-bio-electronics, funded by millions from NIH, DARPA, US Navy and US Army. At least, 11 Chinese patents. 3 Highlights:
• 2014 U.S. Patent about “electronic devices that can be injected or inserted into … biological tissue … through a syringe or a needle”. 4
• Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). 5
• “nanowire diode converts (cellphone) microwaves to electricity”. 6
• 2016 Using HIV to penetrate the cell (a reason why COVID includes HIV sequences): “biomimetic approach in which a cell penetrating peptide, the trans-activating transcriptional activator (TAT) from human immunodeficiency virus 1, is linked to the surface of Si nanowires to facilitate spontaneous internalization of nanowires into primary neuronal cells.” 7
• 2016 The nanowires “could record the electrical communication between structures inside the cell—signals passed from one organelle to another … could electrically stimulate those organelles for therapeutic purposes. Or could carry small molecule drugs and deliver them directly to cells, bypassing some of the body’s natural barriers. Cells consume the nanowires naturally, without any kind of special treatment, and without damaging themselves…” 8
In sum, Lieber’s work was essential towards the nano-routers to track the population and the basis for neuromodulation and 5G/cellphone brain interface, deployed with COVID injections.
More:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline
I don't doubt the investment poured into such focus for research for application, not neglecting the stake of patent claim for striking 'gold'.
The idea of a Medical Operating system in the human mass-mind by which to run various 'applications' for gain of control functions, is already running as 'virology' and 'cancer' frameworks of securitised definitions, treatments and socially conditioning countermeasures.
All of which converge on Biotech - which is in fact its foundation all along; the technologising of biological models for marketing and weaponising or control function.
Science is supposed to stand on the shoulders of giants, as part of its 'sacred history', but errors, omissions and fraud of personal+corporate distortions set Thescience as begotten of giant mistakes - set into its foundations and deemed too big to fail - hence the culture of sacrifice to 'Save the System' - that has become our defence against every kind of evil - from the old plagues to a host of novel derivatives.
Discovering Biofield as an underlying energy matrix for biology has deep significance far beyond 'medical applications' or even technological explorations - but the stakeholders for a mindset of possession and control see only threat - (a sort of Herod -complex)- and so the true science is aborted while the funding shapes marketising and weaponising applications for GoF - regardless whether the claim of function is in fact running gain of fiction.
Working in vaccinnology will not question the predicates that shape, define and drive their research. No more will biotech research institutions - and nor by the way did those working on 'The Gadget' know what their work was being used for - and when they did - whether it was in fact as claimed.
Compartmentalised specialities can be manipulated unwitting while endeavouring to 'solve problems'.
So what's real and what's psyop?
That's a good question to hold before acting on false evidences appearing real.
One of my questions is; do enough people WANT the biotech future to manifest the basis for its frameworks as a matrix for a deeper dissociation from Intimacy of being - allowing that all trauma rises from loss of connection, trust and support - hence resort to defence-complex of social+cultural developments that mask over conflicts as if to forfend disaster.
Exactly.
Malone should know since he is one of ghe lying monkeys.
personally I prefer SherpaGnome
Why do you think that?
For one thing, he did not invent mrna. His behavior of the past 4 years has been disgusting towards other professionals who really were trying to help. He is a malignant narcissist who used the whole covid atrocity for self aggrandizement. Do some digging, if you want to find it ypu will.
And he also tried to sue Dr. Jane Ruby and Dr. Peter Breggin. Malone is a fraud, and I saw it the first time I heard him speak about the "vaccines". I can't remember which platform but it was back in 2021 I believe.
Yes me too.
Right.
"After 5 years, we are still exploring this and yet we still seem light years away from real answers."
How about 9/11? Twenty three years and counting. Still no REAL answers. Of course, anyone with an IQ of 100+ and the will to look at the mountains (yes, plural) of evidence understands that Israel did it.
Here's a REAL answer:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/911-2-planes-3-towers
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/107-911
In terms for getting to answers it might be helpful to understand Moncef Slaoui’s role regarding OWS. To confirm, Monsef S headed OWS and worked for GSK for 30 years as well as Moderna and Lonza who manufacturers the Moderna jabs. If the head of GSK vaccines headed up OWS it would seem that pharma was involved at some level. It would be great to see posts on Moncef and his role in pharma and OWS.
I wrote about Monsef, and I have first hand account of him. He wasn't an "evil planner" and definitely did not realize what DARPA was actually doing. Most of the regular participants in OWS did not, they really believed there was a pandemic, believed they were working hard to solve it, believed they had to ship doses by January or they will "miss the window" to vaccinate, and they were also all told that the doses were going to be only made available to "high-risk" people. They did not know the US DoD will start force injecting pregnant women and children and were horrified when they realized what is happening. Moncef was quickly removed, accused in some pretend sexual harassment charge and made to shut up and retire.
But Moncef was head of Operation Warp Speed and worked for GSK for 30 years in vaccines followed by Moderna and Lonza. This shows pharma involvement. It’s difficult to imagine that he would not be familiar with gene therapy and the risks of mRNA including risks of rushed scale up to produce these biologics.
"it shows pharma involvement" - this is the government buying stuff from pharma companies, duh, of course there is pharma involvement. Moncef was not familiar with what DARPA/DOD really intended to do. I know this for a fact.
Moncef was part of OWS for sure and probably did really think a deadly pandemic was possible. However we need to look at other individuals like Ralph Baric at UNC and his research which was certainly in the field as early as 2018. He has a number of interesting patents and apparently had comms with the Wuhan lab. He's never been asked to testify or answer any questions in front of any investigative committee. I have no idea if he had connections indirectly with DARPA or BARDA however he certainly had foreknowledge of a SARS type pandemic nearly 2 years before.
The "dancing israelis" were filming the 911 event and got caught. They were Mossad operatives but of course were let go by FBI. Later on in Israel on live TV they said they were documenting the event! it's hard to find on the internet, no surprise there. I have the video footage but that is plain as day a confession if ever i saw one.
Yes, "We were only there to document the event." If you go somewhere to document an event you have foreknowledge.
It was his way of saying "We didn't have anything to do with the thermite, the wiring or explosives.", which is exactly why they were there.
The willingness to ask a real question will use every result to refine its questioning. Most questions are really statements in the form of a question. That is - they are loaded with false assumptions seeking validation, or terms and conditions that reality is supposed to meet.
What do we truly want to know?
Well clearly many different agendas running on may levels that include NOT wanting to know - and thus seeking for something by which to maintain 'shields up!' against what we are as yet unwilling or unready to accept. Psychosis can result from premature or forceful exposure.
Many want a story that can enable them to go back to sleep.
But the stories being fed them are more fearful than the process of owning conflict rather than seeking to scape it to anywhere anyone else. As a Call to heal - not to blame-sacrifice and war over 'who pays?'.
In short, there are the five stages of grief. The majority of people are stuck in stage one, denial.
(I take your kind reply as a lens though which to consider the nature or rather mindset of denial)
The nature of denial is to operate a split mind under masking narrative.
So while I agree with you -I qualify that 'yes' by addressing grief or pain of loss at our root level - not in various pretexts of distributed mitigation.
Enthusiasm or joy in life is native or integral, but fear of pain of loss runs conditional to our current identity of active core beliefs and definitions.
In short our story sets rules and permissions for perception & response. This offers a selective past as the frame for our present as unfolding future, where the selection is in effect running blind as a default conditioning of survival strategies for adapting to and as a split mind or 'denial-mode'.
Denial-mode runs countermeasure to fear of revisiting trauma (hated-feared inner conflict or humiliations that associate with formative relational conflicts) - Fear of pain of loss.
So what is Acceptance of truth in terms of our perceptions of others?
If I cannot accept truth from you, must I project my 'version' onto you and react as real?
I don't write to muscular thinking at all! But to prompt or invite deeper curiosity of states where it seems 'everyone else is the problem', or just as blame-framing; 'I am the problem'.
The packaging of conflicts to 'external solutions' reiterates the 'problem' as a protected basis or framework for identity set on and validated by such 'solutions'.
Self-specialness runs a split or segregative mind as the right to judge & subdue the 'Other' as righteous sacrifice to the god set over and apart from life.
Terror gods run beneath the aychetype-ture of our psychic and cultural inheritance (no less our rational superstructure of a claim to define life as its laboratory or machine).
Fear miscreates in the mind of those who share in it.
without the light from another mind self-illusion would not be undone or healed at its root (or in truth).
But untruth never became truth -even though we suffer grievously under its claim of function, accepted as our own. So are 'denier and denied' bound by contract to accept 'something else' in place of truth at heart? We would have to imagine what that would be, and there's the creative, set in wishful or fearful thought, in which to be phished by its own image.
Binra...we surmise that your
expressive writing...is both Intuitive....thoughtful..and..a .hell of a lot of fun.*Thanks.
If you look at the fundamental questions that Harold Hillman asked of his stonewalling peers in biological science - and which were never answered - you might wonder how much of what has been assigned to cells and projected into them as various functions & apparatus is actually real - though it is defended as real by its investor base-which of course includes the mass mindshare to the 'worldview' framed in expert 'knowledge'.
The reality looks to me to be an energetic field phenomenon.
Much of what naturally occurs within Field dynamics is thus assigned to 'special attributes' of the entity - that can be claimed to break or fail such as to require boosting or replacement.
The ego is exactly that idea applied to the 'self' which we all think or act as if we know or understand, yet projects its conflicts onto all its relationships and suffers them 'unfairly'.
Believing is seeing. Thus to reevaluate belief allows renewal of vision from a wider perspective. But the nature of belief is to operate as a primary focus for perceiving, to which other witnesses are seen as interference, irritants or threats.
Interesting that a cell is a prison yet also a basis for a network of communication. I see that no less of a self; we can be transparatent to a field of communication or locked down and structured to block or attack communication.
That's the choice before me- whatever the story being run or sold.
Bravo.**
Harold Hillman was a man with a massive brain and testicles
Dr. Ulrich's presentation was FANTASTIC. Really credible. Really professionally delivered. Thank you for sharing that.
Her presentation was a failure. She has done nothing to address the dark field microscopy structures that look nothing like cholesterol pictures she showed. She hasn't even looked.
i will likely do a rebuttal of this lady dr like i did last night on another lady dr on infowars saying she found world first nano robots in blood.
After watching my rebuttal. It is laughable and easy to see through the lies and ignorance of this feminist hysteric with nanocytosis.
Notice it's a bunch of lady drs stirring the nano worry well
Your bias against women also discredits you. This did not begin with Dr Ana. It began with men. Specifically, La Quinta Columna were here several months before Dr Ana appeared on the scene. Which is one of the reasons I think she is either paranoid or controlled op herself, due to her lack of scientific research for the conclusions she is promoting, she is well positioned to discredit the entire ‘nano’tech theory. It would be interesting to add her to the chart. Neither am I a fan of Dr Jane Ruby. The nanotech theory needs to be taken seriously and independently researched using proper scientific methods to disprove it, given the clearly articulated transhumanist agenda that includes the Internet of Bodies and the military R&D towards Super Soldiers. The problem for those that rely purely upon scientific evidence to prove anything and everything is that the scientific evidence has to be looked at in proper context taking into consideration the 30,000ft view, and not in isolation from global political, cultural and religious ideologies that drive and fund BigPharma.
Super Soldiers!!! LMAOOOOO! I was planning to write about the state of tech there, but was sidetracked. It's priceless comedy, really. Thanks for reminding about that bullshit.
As stated - but you seem to have missed the entire point Sasha that was referring to people such as yourself that entirely base their conclusions on scientific evidence to the exclusion of all other context - "The problem for those that rely purely upon scientific evidence to prove anything and everything is that the scientific evidence has to be looked at in proper context taking into consideration the 30,000ft view, and not in isolation from global political, cultural and religious ideologies that drive and fund BigPharma."
The problem with your postulation here (I should say Dr. Ulrich's) is that it doesn't fit with the Hollywood sci-fi dystopian scenario that I've been pre-programmed to latch on to.
Are you really suggesting that nanobots connecting my brain to the "Internet of Things" are not in these experimental injections that were foisted upon the public in response to a mysterious "lab leaked" pathogen? No it wasn't a love match between a bat and pangolin it was definitely a viral escapee that seeped out the window left open by a janitor. Didn't that subcommittee tell us this?
In any case I'm sorry but Ulrich's analysis doesn't cut it and frankly there's no room in the social media hysteria market for such ordinary tales. Are you trying to put Sigourney Weaver and Dennis Quaid out of work? Too late, the script has already been writ.
The alternative explanation is that these injections are really more of the same mass poisoning, albeit a teensy bit more toxic, and the Covid Con was just another mundane, albeit amped up a tad, mass medical homicide/mass fraud event visited upon the public by their own governments at the behest of the financial oligarchs that run the show.
Sorry but parroting such alt-dissident evidence-based explanations will not get you invited to the next big pow-wow sponsored by the Wellness Company. Not to mention your chances for a cameo in the upcoming Weaver/Quaid pandemic blockbuster have just been reduced to net zero.
Did I say blockbuster...
But come on, Elon musk said he would read our thoughts! 😆
https://posthumousstyle.substack.com/p/neuralink-does-not-read-minds-and
I know, I know- Elon is the man behind the curtain- so very smart even as he sounds like an entitled frat boy I know he is always playing eleventh-dimensional chess.
Hopefully Elon my boy doesn't run out of lithium any time soon. How else we gonna fund those mRNA factories?
Shit, gotta go, I see my Tesla is smoldering in the driveway.
"Shit, gotta go, I see my Tesla is smoldering in the driveway." Damn funny comment. That's two Bravo's in one day. Best regards.
He's the shiester from the Simpsons that comes in and sells the city a monorail that's a piece of shit.
That's his super tunnel project which makes no technical sense at all and has failed at every step lol.
Elon's top secret: EVs cause cancer
Go green with gasoline!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/electric-vehicles-cause-cancer
TESLA killer. Unless Mush sorry Musk is able to get the fed gov to sanction Toyota.
https://myelectricsparks.com/toyota-presents-the-first-water-engine-2500-oc-and-dual-injection-to-outperform-hydrogen/
https://media.toyota.co.uk/toyota-unveils-new-technology-that-will-change-the-future-of-cars/
https://www.toyota.com/mirai/
I worked on hydrogen engine project (as a consultant analyst) for GM right out of school, many years ago. This was one of the very few non-pharma things I did. The tech is not easily scalable for vehicles, but can be used in stationary power generation easily. However, it has been suppressed in favor of all the green bullshit scams, including Tesla. Maybe Toyota will actually make it work.
I think they can make it work Sasha. They are currently racing it. Time will tell. Sadly I believe there will be a lot of econmic pressure to keep the motor Toyota is working on out sight and out of mind.
Did you check the links out?
+100 likes. High quality sar-chasm is appreciated here. Bravo!
hehehe
pretty good.
Thank you very much, the nanobot story didn't sit well with me, and I have been waiting for a proper rebuttal to surface.
I must say that I am truly grateful for all of your postings during the last few years. Having a scientific background myself, I find your approach to the covid issue very refreshing. As well, I love your artistic presentations! Thank you so much.
As usual, rational thought and analysis rules the day. Thank you, Sasha.
Go back and listen closely. Compare her pictures of cholesterol with the dark field microscopy footage. The only thing achieved is denial, wishful thinking, and drinking more koolaid.
It's a great work of love to help to dispel myths.
Lots of people suffer anxiety with many myths about this.
I know that some will never stop believing or promoting this fear propaganda. In some cases, because it's their job: chaos agents.
In other cases, because conned people, the victims of a massive fraud, develop an emotional connection with their controllers. Almost religious.
People demand that politicians must be willing to admit error (masks, distancing, injections) and to admit to having committed atrocious crimes and having used terrorist techniques to manipulate people.
Both are difficult: people rarely admit crimes or treason to their country, and they are also specialists in scapegoating.
But anyone who wants to know what is real should demand from themselves to be willing to admit error about nanobots in this terror campaign. To continue to push this means opening a huge door for politicians to escape through.
At some point, the last thing to do coincides with the honorable thing to do, which is to admit error and apologize.
“Cult” is a bit strong. Just people trying to make sense of things related to the Covid scam.
However, Always good to see information that challenges the nanotech narrative. I’m happy to jump out of the rabbit hole regarding this one!
If you had to deal with these nutjobs in my comment section, you would quickly realize they are a cult.
The Nanobot Cult Leader, is none other than Boris Johnson!
In his 'Robot Chicken UN Speech 2019' (literally titled such), he let the vax out the bag, so to speak, that something was coming that damned Anti-Vaxxers the scourge of Science Deniers that they are, would pose a pesky threat to.
He lauded over false pro vaxx nonsense of curing Smallpox etc and then jumped straight to ...wait for it...NANOBOTS... "smaller than a red blood cell, swimming your veins to fix your liver!". Then he went to smart dust and smart sewers, right up to Neural Implants reading minds and future Alexas/Googles, that would know your every thought and chastise you!
He then promised UK would lead the way on all this claptrap and safeguards, to ensure a Utopia, not Dystopian Nightmare!
Then swanned off stage to get pissed up laughing, as he handed the Country to the globalists Covid SCAM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaN-MbGV4dY
This clip, has been DOCTORED now, to swap all the correct order of the speech, as it was too obvious once people found it during early covid. I have both versions.
So the Cult NANOBOT Leader, is Boris himself! Implying the future vaccines would contain such tech.
Feel free Sasha to punch him squarely in the face and kick him in the nuts, as he is responsible for all the Cultists that plagued your substack chat! ;)
Nice painting as ever :)
Namaste & Inlak'ech
That narrative is not created by Johnson, he was just repeating it. The nanobot fixing the liver is Ray Kurzweil/Google (Sergei Brin, +Musk + Theil, etc.) that crowd actually believes this bullshit. At least some of them do.
Fair enough Sasha, I was unaware of whom he was referencing. I merely meant Boris planted such idea pre "Covid" scam and the Vaxes even being mentioned, let alone suspected of nano-tech clap trap, clung to vehemently by the cultists now. I find his speech interesting, as it literally lays out the CovidScam ahead of time, showing clear foreknowledge. He should be in jail, as should they all, not releasing new books for Christmas!
Namaste & Inla'kech
What horrifying cyborg scum Boris Johnson is...he led the way for star keirmer.**...keir
starmer....no problem..just Hang them from public lamp posts...*
Most of the sacred names mentioned ..if not all..are...chosenites**
Well, if always keeping an open mind about all possibilities, makes me a “nutjob”, then so be it!
you can keep open mind, but again, if you were hounded with extreme aggression, like I am every time I tell people nanobots are bullshit, you would quickly realize the aggressives are a cult.
A cultic identity forms around a self-certainty drawn against evil.
When Jesus said "Resist YE not evil" he was wise to the liability of assuming the role of God's Holy Warrior.
Bringing all to truth - even the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune - allows a discernment of grounded practical wisdom - else we become cultic by staking our to our countermeasures as The Right to get rid of enemies while making virtue credits.
Mothers who think the vax saves their children from death and disease can become extremely hostile to suggestions that the vax harms them. There's a way of it. Because its 'all coming out anyway' I feel to say things I would not previously - but still not from a right to tell others the truth!
This is an ongoing learning for me. Where do I choose to stand? I side with freedom - which includes learning from our choices as freedom to make better choices- toward real choice instead of false framed binary.
But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
More extrapolative..magisterial. stentorian .trenchant fun words from * Binra*..Cheers. God bless..and..God speed
Now everyone else must Rearm at once.*
I agree, nothing is off the table.
The fact that they tried to hide information about these jabarroos makes me suspicious full circle.
Nano Bots were never vigorously opposed by Pfizer or Moderna. Why?
Because they want this story, they probably even pay for this story to circulate as it helps them to point, laugh, and say that all anti-vaxxers are cranks that think they have nanobots inside... I don't blame them for this...
I agree: I early observed that some of the wilder and more insane 'predictions' on the WEF websire, for instance, were placed there precisely to make anti-vaxxers look foolish when repeated.
'Putting everyone refusing in camps to murder them' - logistically impossible! - was circulated for the same reason.
2020-22 showed us that all that is needed to control minds and kill is 1/ TV, and 2/ poisonous injections and deadly hospital protocols.
I don't either. Sad that we are so mindless and uncritical that we swallow nano bots hook line and sinker.
Honestly I didn't know. Curious about that info. But didn't need to know as I didn't get jabbed.
The story of bots is one more hole to go down. These guys are not that good. They are good at snow jobs apparently. If then number of people believing in that nonsense is accurate.
I say apparently because the general US population's intelligence has been tanking for the last 50 years. Now we believe nearly everything. If we don't believe, we accept because we are to lazy to dig.
Love your work and art. I recognize many of the landscapes from the Napa Valley region. I lived in the North Coast region of California for about 30s. Left in the 2000s as Napa and Sonoma regions became watering holes for the rich.
Helpful mis-info, which can be discredited later, to shame Tin Foilers as deluded fools.
yes
I appreciated your sweet and professional demeanor during your presentation. However, I was disappointed by the derogatory comments you made about Dr. Ana Mihalcea. It would be more beneficial to maintain a respectful tone and refrain from using offensive language when addressing individuals who may have differing perspectives on the information presented.
I have no interest in Ana or you or your cult. YOU come to MY page and make derogatory comments and expect me to be sweet and professional in return? Get a clue, lady.
Then actually address the darkfield microscopy footage instead of using a presentation the does nothingvti compare, is not comparable, bears no resemblance whatsoever.
First you should address that nanobots are not visible under a MICROscope. LMAO. Yeah, that.... after this maybe people will take you a little more seriously.
But you are only providing a presentation that is like comparing apples and oranges. Again. Instead of actually addressing the darkfield microscopy images. You never do.
Add you can't address your lies about nano- using MICROscopy.
And this is the entire problem with your position. You emotively abuse people with derogatory comments and attempt to dismiss without providing actual science. All I am looking for are actual microscopy experts that can provide the scientific evidence that there is no nano - or MICRO - bots (whatever, I don't care the point is they are not visible with the naked eye so arguing semantics on this point is irrelevant and a distraction that enables you to further make flippant comments that are derogatory abuse). You are not a microscopy expert, so the question is why do you even weigh in on this topic as though you are? Furthermore, you persistently ignore and dismiss the patents that actually prove intent, regardless of your assumption that they are not capable of manufacturing these 'inventions'. Nevertheless, you assume that your knowledge is beyond the limits of the Trueman Show or The Matrix, when in fact you are captive within it. You have no knowledge of top secret classified projects, of USDoD or DARPA Black Ops projects, AND you assume that all is in plain sight. How can you be so foolish as to believe that they have shown you their entire hand of cards? Look at the evil that has mandated these bioweapon injections across the entire planet. I like your work, I have always been impressed, but on this topic I can only conclude you are either in denial or a gatekeeper. Show me the SCIENCE. Show me any microscopy expert that can refute in scientific detail, the microscopy footage that has been collated by La Quinta Columna. Interesting that NONE of you that attempt to disregard the nanotech theory, EVER provide any evidence to refute La Quinta Columna. Instead. you attempt to refute by providing a PhD that only compares with Cholesterol. And not even comparing and contrasting under darkfield microscopy. I call this approach manipulative perception management. Science is supposed to be debate, not character assassinate through derogatory comments and rapid dismissal of views that cause you cognitive dissonance or are harmful to your agenda. The death of science is happening right here on your Substack. And Science needs to understand that Politics - including cultural and religious belief systems - are also a part of this agenda. I called out USDoD on social media months before you and Katherine Watt joined the dots, so thankyou for confirming my conclusions. I called them out as Psychopaths and Narcissists several weeks before Dr Reiner Fuellmich or anyone else on Social Media, and now people can see that this is what we are dealing with. To date throughout this plandemic, I have been 100% correct. And I have been biting my tongue for long enough.
OMG. Can you list some more hate and injustice that happened to you? Why are you still not famous with all this amazing knowledge that you have? And who is making you bite your tongue? Are you safe? Blink twice if you need me to call 911.
It becomes a cult when there is an extreme religious devotion and adherence to a belief detached from basic reality.
The denial cult is in full force here. Sasha is in denial. Or defending USDoD and Ukrainian bioweapons labs.
yeah, right, I am the idiot who can't tell the difference between nano- and micro scale... Ooops, no, that's you. It's denial, for sure! LOL.
COMPOUND MICROSCOPES HAVE RESOLUTION DOWN TO 250 nanometers
Compound microscopes, on the other hand, rely on visible light and are limited by the wavelength of light (approximately 400-700 nanometers). This restricts their ability to resolve features smaller than about 250 nm.
Everyone is an idiot at times
None of the pictures that these idiots promote are at nanoscale, how is that?
I told you why.
Their compound scopes only have resolution down to 200-250nano meters. Out of the1000nano meters. The scopes see >75% of nano structures with a MICROscope. Except sub 200nm particles.
I have firmly stated my position. There are no nano robots in the Jim Juices or dental juices. The formations being touted by the whole world as nano routers are SALT!!! But, there is ABSOLUTELY nano technology in the vx vails. Everything i say here is scientifically correct and replicable science.
My comments always age well like my genetics
These believers in nanobots detract from the credibility of the research of others who are trying to describe what happens when the mRNA jabs are injected into a human. Not fair to lump them together with the rest of the anti-RNA jabbers.
There are two cults actually. There is the death cult that unleashed the slow kill bio weapon, and then there is the cult that was created after 3/11/2020, the Branch Covidians, easily identified wearing light blue face diapers.
Yes! Branch Covidians! Was 3/11/2020 the date that masking was initiated? The only issue I have with the name is that really it began long before that....when those who follow along would not analyze or want to think about or care about the issues of pedophilia, Bohemian Grove, Epstein and the Deep State, the harm to the children and how to stop it.
3/11/2020 was the day that Bill Gates' hand-picked-for-the-job former President of Ethiopia and overseer of a genocide, WEF Gen. Sec. Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus declared a global pandemic.
The rest is, as they say, history.
And very nasty history I may add.
Then read this… its opposite opinion from research not conducted by a linguist and obstetrician
https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/222490/3/Research_and_patents.pdf
yeah, follow the experts, friend. We are non-experts here.
The amazing pristine fact is that Sasha has become the no pretense no nonsense absolute voice of integrity...though we have ...zero confidence in rfk Jr..but overall Sasha shines like the Sun in her strength.We see quite clearly that she is in the forefront of pushing the changes of the the Overton window..let her go on to greater and greater achievements..she may *sound*strident*but look at the tidal wave s of obscurantist.s.....statists..and the..toadie advocates of biopharmakeia...Sasha has been directly over the target for some time...no doubt new information and new victories will emerge because She did so veryvwell.well....funalky..there is in America especially on the internet..a scorching cut your head off purity test vibe...pray for Her to win..because if she wins...we all will win**Be sure if it...**Be intuitive not flat minded monochromatic dogmatists..all of us need to see the final. end of scientific dictatorship....** the end of the..monster mash..scientism..the final eradication of the graveyard smash new ..lyshenkoism.. ..... . Sasha doesn't have to pretend to be JESUS CHRIST to be damn good..just...the way she is.....jus sayin...
Typo..finally...very well..frankinsteen pseudo science...the monster mash..graveyard smash new ... lyshenkoism.....shades of Ceaucesku....gates fauci zaks bourla..lions tigers and bears..creepy crawly
scorpion demonss...**
Trust the settled science..or..satanic scientific materialism only...sounds great for a former Soviet union
psych ward...
I’m sorry, the patents in the article I linked were discussing nanotechnology, but not self-assembling structures.
Patents are a fictional literature. That's why they are called "art". Thanks.
If I recall the patents industry is like wall street, controlled, corrupted and directed.
Not just any obstetrician, that doctor from the research was a fertility doctor. Her job for decades has been counting sperm cells and evaluationg their mobility and write dossiers that say the client is 75% infertile and they need to buy a fertility treatment from the clinic, such as in vitro fertilization.
Kind of biased, if you ask me.
The linguist guy looks to me like a political activist seeking an opening to land in some paltry legislative position. It's almost an archetype!
instead of attacking personalities, I suggest to read the paper and provide a rebuttal if this is so important.
Understood.
I read the paper when it appeared in the substack space. People were so excited: the ribbons, the ball-chain. Definitive proof, they said. I refrained from attacking personalities then. I argued against the data. Then the nutjobs attacked my personality, by telling me: "you're a gatekeeper, you're a shill."
Obviously, the two authors of the paper, the Korean Doctor and the Canadian Linguist (I think he was Canadian? maybe I remember wrong) didn't attack my personality, nor did they tell the people on substack to attack the heretics. They did that on their own. So it's unfair that I attack them now. I should attack the trolls instead.
Therefore, I apologize to the Obstetrician/fertility expert, and to the Linguist fellow.
I know, welcome to the club. If I had a dollar for every time I am called a gatekeeper! I don't think there are enough gates in the world...
There is one particular Gates in the world too many! ;)
Bingo.
I’m just focused on your art today; excellent !!!
Considering the large number of manufacturing operations utilized for 'vaccine' production and the apparent lack of quality assurance, one should expect a vast array of detritus that might be found in the final products. As well, knowing the point of this diabolical operation, we can also expect a huge variety of toxic products implemented just to see what kinds of damage could be observed on the human population.
Thank you. It's about time. I've been eyeing suspiciously the nanobot, etc. talk for quite some time now, noting the names of the main promoters, and pretty much avoiding them like the plague. The problem is, they never offer real evidence of their claims. Micrographs and patents alone, mixed or not with scare talk, aren't evidence.
I worked in the semiconductor industry in the past, and I have seen plenty of micrographs of micro- if not nanotechnology (it's down to nano now), and it didn't look like that at all. If somebody is going to truthfully claim that something is nanotechnology, wouldn't it make sense to have somebody who actually works with nanotechnology weigh in on the matter? I have yet to see that, although I'm not even looking any longer. It looks like a complete waste of time.
Having someone who works closely with lipids weigh in on it does make sense. Again, thank you.
yes, I keep asking this crowd to produce me a person who is controlled by nanotechnology, and show how, so I can interview them? And crickets...
That’s demeaning some peoples nightmare experiences aka “Targeted individuals”. You mock, Sasha, which shows arrogance, on your part.
Bulletproof argument. So, why can't they "target" me for example? Sprinkle some nanobots and make me believe in nanobots? I don't understand...
Exactly.
Oh, so clever! They have the anti-nanobot nanobots... Hmmmm. Let me consult with Ray Kurzweil about this...
Go to my posts. you will see me refute the nano BS with better microscopy skills than anyone of these charlatans on SS. I can't even call it loose science what they do. All the formations they call circuits are sodium ion crystallography. I just started SS but not science.
Looks interesting, and I have your blog bookmarked for follow-up. Thank you.
I haven't prepared a slide or used a microscope myself since 1969 (college), although I grew up having and using microscopes, but I think I could do better than these folks. "That one looks like a wire!" And it somehow becomes a wire -- and obviously part of self-assembling circuitry, just like in the patents. How about finding micro rainbow ribbon cables with self-joining terminations? That would be pretty.
I guess they haven't had a good look at a semiconductor junction.
I have proof of what the so called "NANO Robots" are... promoted by the controlled conditioned herd. Go look at my post calling out Dr Ana, Dr Young, i am just getting started calling out the charlatans w my lab skills.
Especially the stupid doctors dripping with Dunning-Kruger level academic smug.
THERE ARE NO NANO ROBOTS IN THE VX OR DENTAL SOLUTIONS!!!
But.......There is absolutely nano technology in the VX vials. Anyone that says there isn't is a bombastic simpleton....Such as Sasha here. This is very easy to refute with a brief look into the mrna platform. What's in a name? BioNtech??
So anyone saying there is no nano tech in vx is stupid or purposefully misleading you
Why does bill Gates say "we have a lot of new nano particles that are very self assembly. We just need to play with them some more" End Quote from Bill Gates
Also Sasha doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about regarding using highly analytical lab equipment. Much less a microscope from goodwill. She claims you can't see >250nano meters with a compound microscope.
Good compound microscopes have a resolution down to >250nanometers This is seeing in the mid nano level range. She is wrong
Science is very easy to fake. Ask Bill. Just lie through skewed, altered statistics.
What these "Dr" presenters present to the herd. Most in the herd 99% are not scientific sleuths able to critically analyze these flimsy, dubious claims.
THE CLAIMED NANO ROBOTS????
The other simpleton Drs haven't figured out and reproduced the science, that they are absolutely sodium ion crystallography being expressed during the droplet evaporative phase in all the liquid injectables. This is because all the liquid solutions contain sodium. This sodium is added as an isotonic stabilizer to keep an osmotic balance in bodily fluids and tissues.
Go to my post and you will see that Dr Ana is the over the top controlled alex jones type co/op. DR ANA SAYS SHE'S BEEN A SPACESHIP!!
This way if you mention nano anything. Many will say it's woo woo and write it all off.
Then you have opposite conclusions from other uninformed stupid humans called doctors such as this doctor lady who lives in a scientific vacuum of her own. She only knows what she knows. She is likely vaccinated as well.
She was looking at protein crystallography as well.
Idiots agreeing with other idiots is a big problem for humanity, but it is how you keep them blind to all angles.
I jumbled my terminology in my first comment, and started to correct it in my reply to you but then decided that it would only sound confusing. LNPs are nanotechnology, and I wouldn't be bothered by these Drs. you mention just by their using that term, if that were the only way they used it, but it's not, as you noted. I noticed what said Drs. were up to when I first came across them.
I don't demand perfection from the authors I follow, but I do look for quality.
I won't argue one side over the other, apart from this...
Can we just stop injecting some factory made s _ _ t into people, please?
How long will we let the maniacs piss behind us and tell us it's raining?
ugh
I agree Peter 100%... We can all agree these shots are depopulation bioweapons! No doubt about it. And others who don't believe this... are part of the 'Normie cult'... ... the "nothing to see here" cult... the "maybe it wasn't so bad" cult. NOT! It was very BAD, and everyone knows it.
Thank you for your post, Peter. I agree.
Carol posted a genuine lovely sympathetic and very human ..really thoughtful comment.No bile..no invective...no ad hominems....how refreshing......God bless .
the internet of ding dongs
https://Nanobotsrus.ding/dong we should register this.
Except people will think we are trying to sell injectable robots into the penis(ding dong). Tech Treatments for erectile dysfunction. Or implanted hand sensors that ring peoples door knobs.
Either way Elon would be interested in buying the start up. Then you will REALLY be called controlled opposition! Working in pharma with the big E of the endless line of credit!!! And Elon can keep it up long enough for 11 more kids and 3 more wives. OMG i’m dying laughing.
Hey, don't badmouth Austin Powers' Swedish penis pump! Oh wait, that doesn't sound good...
Here’s a nice rabbit hole, 40 years of pushing diesel engine cars onto us, key pollutant is graphite derivatives, it gets into everything as it’s airborne. The graphene in jabs is a hydroxide so acts as a seed crystal to make graphite sheets with sharp hydroxy edges, worse than asbestos and self forming in the right conditions, not nanobots at all but not good for you all the same. Another simple poison like fluoride and the rest of the crap they inject.
Look up top-hat DNA if you want to see how complex we really are and how impractical or impossible gene manipulation with our current tech probable is, we still base everything on blot testing and stats, none of it is accurate. (No references sorry, sitting in the sun reading comments on my phone and thinking)
If you are a chemist. You realize your hypothesis is plausible. I worked in genomics and other fields. If you go to my SS and read up you will agree your hypothesis is wrong on what is currently happening in these liquid solutions during the sessile droplet evaporation phase.
Your close, but the seed crystal source is sodium
Sasha I have run out of words to describe the good you are and the good you do, your essence a warrior for truth, beauty, clarity, and courage.
Your family is very fortunate, as are those that benefit from your purpose.
Thank you.