A much appreciated update, Sasha and Katherine, and the Trial Site News interviewer was excellent as well. And onward we go...a peaceful rest of the weekend to everyone.
I agree that ultimately it is the Court of Public Opinion that rules the roost. The global criminals are loosing the narrative and they know it. What desperate measures can we expect from them in the coming months?
Perhaps too many of us have forgotten that, under the common law, it is a jury of one's peers that rules the roost, is it not? Isn't it about time judges stopped lying to juries about their power to nullify laws?
YT's AI transcribes it, usually with many and sometimes gross mistakes. Click on the 3 vertical dots there next to the share button. But they can always remove the page.
I understand that sentiment and I guess that is the case.
Can you elaborate on the flaws in AI language transcription here or should I read about that at your place? But if I can't comment on it.......I don't know.
Anyhow, a simple test I've come up with is to type something in one language in one of these AI translation tools and then try it in reverse on that tool or another. Change languages, do this a few times and I bet you after enough iterations it would be like the game when kids whisper into the ears of the ones next to them in a circle.
No, I don't have a comments section for my substack. It's not meant to do anything but provide updates to the list.
To make a good transcript, listen carefully with your own ears. Be willing to listen multiple times. Be honest about what you don't understand. As I say, the YT AI transcript can give you a rough idea, a very rough draft to start with, but the YT AI transcript does not distinguish who is speaking, nor does it include punctuation, and it oftentimes makes gross mistakes. Humans make mistakes, too, of course. But I think if you listen very carefully to a video, and really make an honest effort, you can make a much better transcript than can the AI. Professional transcribers use various different types of software but there is no getting around the fact that a good transcript requires human attention.
I know I could get in trouble for this, but I want to post this.....and then after I do it I guess I listen to the YouTube video assuming I can get is 2nd hand. I got a lot of attitude and I play to win.
~~~~~~~
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: In a previous video, paired with this one, Shelly explains that after her second covid jab she suffered from heart palpitations, severe chest pain, pericarditis, and deep vein thrombosis.
TRANSCRIPT
SHELLY: They sent me home with blood thinners. And then on Friday I still hadn't had word on the CT scan so I called [inaudible] Imaging and they told me to call my insurance agency or company, Premier. So I called them and Premier said, you need to go to the hospital right away. And I said, Why do I need to go to the hospital? You need a CT scan right away, we need you to go to the hospital. So I drove myself to the hospital. I get there and sure enough they do a CT scan and I had suffered a pulmonary embolism. And for any of you that don't know what it is, the blood clot in my leg then broke off, traveled up the vein through my tummy, through my heart, and into my lung. People can die from it. I was very, very fortunate that I didn't.
The next morning, they sent me, you know [holds up bottle of pills] I had the blood thinners, the next morning I woke up in severe pain and so I called paramedics and they took me back to the hospital. And I had suffered a second embolism on the way to the hospital.
So my story isn't to talk you out of getting the vaccine. I am pro-vaccine. I vaccinated my children. I got this fu*king vaccine. So it's not to tell you not to get the vaccine. But it is to tell you there are side effects and for some, some they go about with no side effects at all. But I want to tell you that I'm with you on those of you that want to wait, that you want to see how this pans out, on those of you that think this is an overreach from our government, on those of you who just plain are worried about it and want to give this some time. I am so with you. I will stand with you on that hill.
And for the rest of you, the ones, you know, the Jimmy Kimmels and those of you that are shaming the anti-vaxxers and wishing death or harm on them, I want you to look at this face, and I want you to remember my story. Because my life hasn't been the same since I had this vaccine. And it's not for everybody. Not everybody. My body, my choice, right? What I wouldn't do to exchange this bag, this basket [holds up and shakes basket full to the brim with medicines] of sh*t for my health back.
So I want you to think about those people. Think about other people's stories. Walk in their shoes. Give people grace, give people love. We need to meet in the middle here, we need to realize that each one of us comes to the table with a different set of experiences. And of course I'm going to say this vaccine sucks. But I'm not telling you to not get it. But we've got to listen to each other. I just hope that we can somehow meet in the middle here and just provide each other love. Be well everybody. Be well.
3:00
[END]
~~~~
I would like to add this edit. The above transcription comes from Transcriber B's place and I must say it is impressive and I appreciate the art of it. So, since I can't comment at Transcriber B's place, I figured I would say that here and remember the above transcription was from Transcriber B's place. It is professional and touching.
This was helpful to me. I need to understand more clearly the apparent fact that the U.S. Government, Department of Defense is in charge of the the whole "COVID vaccine drug trials" process, and is the "client of Pfizer." That fact supports my focus on the PLANdemic nature of the entire false event program.
All of this planning started many years ago, possibly as far back as the early 2000s
Today I have watched two videos, including this one, and read one Substack posting that all dealt with the same dominant theme: constant big lies being served up to we the people.
My conclusion here is that we are now just basically on our own.
All medical interventions must now be reviewed carefully.
Old tried and true medications with long track records are preferable over anything newly approved, because the approvals are now suspect.
Sad, but this appears to be the case.
Most telling: Neither "party" appears to be willing to grapple with or thoroughly investigate this debacle... except for just a few members... Ron Johnson in particular.
This also highlights the value of medical practitioners that were willing to step out of the box in favor of themselves and their patients. There are some few of those, some with publicity and retribution, and some without, and you are lucky if you have found one.
One thing to remember: Truth always wins. It make take time, sometimes a long time, and effort, sometimes a lot of effort, but truth fosters life, and lies generally foster the reverse.
Let me tell you what they did to Ventoline - the ubiquitous spray asthmatics use when they feel an attack coming on. I've used it for decades. It used to go down like butter. Now, it's like rocks going down - it actually can accentuate the attack for a bit then you sort of break through and flatten out....but breathing doesn't really recover entirely. This all changed around 2001. Most recently, I've had to discard three new sprays.....I can do this since in France, I'm not paying the equivalent of $200 per spray. Wondering what the %$^&# is in these sprays now. I can end up hyperventalating for hours or have my parasympathetic breathing so wrecked, I have to THINK to breath because it has been temporarily disabled. And this is just on ONE puff! Feel like there's different toxicity levels depending on the lot #, but discarding this many at a time? Looks like they've upped their game.
I'm thinking of the poor children that are being subjected to this poison and can't breath. On one of my last visits, the doctor said perhaps I have 'non-treatable' asthma. Huh??? This is the term they've now attached when Ventoline was WONDERFUL before, but now wrecks the system.
Of course I've told doctors, but they just wave me off. But I did have a respiratory tech in the hospital tell me around 2000 they changed medicines for asthma and now when people come in, they need to go through two or three treatments before they recover.
It happened to me when I had another major attack and was in the ER. The treatment that used to go down like butter felt like acid and I needed a second one to recover. That steroid punch left me unable to walk properly for two months - I was unable to stand for any length of time, my muscles were so weak.
I'm sure others are having a miserable time on their medications which are being tweaked.
While I could understand the judgement as the strict letter of the contract reading, I finally resolved what made me uneasy. In NJ this would be a clear violation of consumer protection laws. The substitution of DOD sourced vaccines for a Pharma product, represented to the public as a product manufactured with strict controls, at least as good as a blister pack of SUDAFED at CVS, is a bait-and-switch. It is called an “affirmative misrepresentation” that is punished by any judge in NJ with triple damages at the slightest whiff of fraud. VERY strict. I asked the PA DOH for a copy of the VIS. If this switch was not divulged in an FDA approved document then the violation of consumer law has occurred. I’m guessing the consumer protection laws in PA are similar, as contractors frequently do business across the state line. We can be pretty certain the VIS will not mention it. Why this could not be prosecuted under state law would be my question. If a person is said to be immune from murder under Federal law, states can negate so serious a violation of their own Constitution.
I agree that it would be good for state AGs to pursue this line of attack, and it’s one that I and others have been advocating for awhile, within the message that “people should file anything and everything they can think of, and here’s a list of possible types of cases to try.”
The bottleneck for consumer safety cases — as with most of the other cases — is the lack of willing prosecutors. I don’t think there’s a private cause of action for consumer fraud; the cases have to be brought by a public prosecutor on behalf of the public victims.
And the second bottleneck is the truth that we now know from Brook’s case: there is no “market” when it comes to the bioweapons, and there are no “consumers,” so there can’t be “consumer fraud.”
Instead of a market, what we’re operating on is a battlefield or war zone, during a war.
And militaries are under minimal obligations to notify military targets about the weapons the militaries use. In standard armed conflicts, at least over the last 50-75 years, the idea was that the parties had to abide by shared rules of engagement, and some entity interested in enforcing those, had to enforce them somehow.
But because this war is global, it’s uncharted terrain. There are no rules of engagement as far as the public knows (there may be secret UN rules of engagement, a topic I briefly explored here:
as I began to think the pharma/DOD contracts were more relevant to the operations of the governments than any other governing-type rules or constitutions.
Under the 2001 AUMF and the subsequent amendments to US military law, though, there are no defined geographic or temporal boundaries and no legal distinctions between civilians and combatants.
So there seem to be zero obligations for any of the parties — which also aren’t defined — under any military law, to disclose the truth about the war in which they’re engaged, or the weapons they’re using.
Thank you for this detailed reply to the previous post. There’s a lot to learn! How does all this apply to other countries, eg, Australia, where I live? I certainly remember politicians saying something like we were on “a war footing.” I wonder if they used that term to dodge consumer law.
I was just talking about this with my husband. Surely if consumer laws can call for the withdrawal of a packet of frozen berries which have caused illness in a dozen people, then a drug which has caused many deaths and enormous numbers of injuries, many of which are severe and life-changing, should be withdrawn, and those responsible should be punished for pushing these drugs as safe and effective. I’m in Australia and we have deaths and injuries here of course, like anywhere else. We want justice!
"after doing all this research and analysis it became very clear that ... suing pharmaceutical manufacturers under the false claims act was...a fool's errand" @5:30
Yes! This is a genocide.
We don't need to talk so much anymore about how their weapons work.
I have no idea under what circumstances they could dismiss Brook Jackson’s case as as a person who has been involved in DoD testing back in the early and mid 60’s and as a participant and subject over the years with Pharma companies her information was to my experience true and correct.
Reading the information she had was similar to many occasions where the statistics and the rabbit holes that should have been explored and would have kept many of the SAE’s from occurring.
This won’t stop until people rise up and stop donating $$ to the politicians and decide to be critical thinkers about the information that the media and Pharma put out. Read the data and look at the statistics.
Even those that lack a lot of statistics exposure should be able to ask does this really add up? Does it really sound right? Does it sound as fishy as it feels?
Yes it is, Brook and the many who helped investigating the Pfizer data and hopefully Moderna as well, verify the work they all have done and for the people who have brought the info forward to Substack.
Don’t let them off the hook - politicians who have bought and paid for and as well the alphabet government groups and their leaders. Total baloney and BS has been the last three years.
Ms. Mohamed did an excellent job of conducting this interview. I searched for more information regarding her activities, and here is an example of Ms. Mohamed's clarity of thought regarding the World Health Organizations ongoing racketeering operations. >
Shabnam Palesa Mohamed on the WHO and the Way Forward
Ms. Mohamed is also executive director and chapter coordinator of Children’s Health Defense Africa, as a steering committee member of World Council for Health.
Thank you Sasha for all of your hard work and due diligence in explaining how the entire Covid plandemic and the history of how the toxic covid shots came about. More people are understanding what happened and what's still happening, that the governments in the US and worldwide are still trying to cover up the crime scenes. But, there's no way to continue to try and hide the bodies. Once we see the light there's no way we can undo that. Keep up the great work and I will continue to share your pieces.
It is indeed unfortunate that some of the USA primadonna reporters like Tucker, Sean, etc seem unable to anything like the wonderful presentation by this South African presenter. Shame on them all. As more normies lose family and friends and wake up we will stop this outrage from happening again. Sasha and Katherine have unearthed the incontrovertible evidence documenting the complete DOD operation. NO MORE SHOTS!
Hey Saga Hana - not to get off-base here, but I have one suggestion. In the message you sent with my chosen subscription there was a one-stop link to "unsubscribe" and while I appreciate being able to unsubscribe, I just chose to subscribe, so I don't think you should throw that out there from a marketing standpoint....it makes me wonder......just a friendly suggestion from the son of the Director of Marketing in his day!
OK, for me what I did was go to the "Dashboard" page, then click on the "Settings" tab and then there was a place to "Edit" the welcome email. So, I did that, and what I think is the case is that you have an older "grandfathered" template. Probably all you need to do is "Edit" it and then the easy unsubscribe link won't be there.
That is what I think may be the case and since I'm not sure - free of charge! Ha, ha.
Ken
*edit - you know I went to my own message and it needed a few edits, and then I made the edits. So I'm glad we have had this conversation and if you want my opinion you can rest assured I will share it!
You know what Sage Hana - we are buried deep in this conversation so it could be the browser you are using is not up to date. Anyhow, it probably isn't worth any consternation and it was just a suggestion on my end.....
I'm glad we discussed it because on my end I updated my welcome message and while at some time in the future I hope to have over 100 subscribers my intent is never to ask for anybody to contribute because I don't really need the money and if I got paid I might feel sort of obligated to provide content and that just doesn't work with my disposition.
Hopefully SubStack realizes authors such as myself ought be allowed to be part of the community and not be treated as "2nd Class writers" just because they don't entail nor desire financial transactions at their SubStack place. I say this because I think if the geniuses behind SubStack are "wise" they will realize that authors sharing my sentiment not to ask for any payment add to the "richness" of the place as a whole - to the benefit of those who choose to write and those who choose to read whether they pay or not. Of course, it ought be evident that SubStack provide a forum for writers and if I don't have any funds coming into the place, I would understand if there was a nominal fee to pay for the forum services to give writers who don't desire "currency" for a chance to express views freely.
Well, I just got a response from Transcriber B above, and the "unsubscribe" option was there, but it was not highlighted in any way....just a friendly suggestion and based on what I've already read I'm looking forward to being a subscriber - for free at first is my policy, but after awhile, I like to contribute financially to writers I support.
If you want, I will try to figure it out and get back to you at your place maybe!
It ain't no big deal.
To be honest, I don't even know what my "response" says - I edited some things and it could be you have an "older" version - who knows....things are in such flux. Hopefully the flux has peaked for the time being - I hope so.
I look forward to reading what you express at your place - your SubStack place.
You know, I'd be willing to make a transcript of it and I think I could be pretty accurate, but I just not assume watch YT - maybe an MP3 file or some such of it could be made, but it is easier to transcript if you can see the video. I'm really pretty sure I would be quite capable of doing this and accurate as well. Of course, the fee would be commensurate.....or some such...
ha, ha, ha...
BK
*edit: I'm not exactly sure how to say this, but your post made me think about something I had forgotten - so, I decided to Subscribe to you place for the time being! Thanks.
Doesn’t get better than that. Thank you both so much!
Thank you, Brook from all of us!!
A much appreciated update, Sasha and Katherine, and the Trial Site News interviewer was excellent as well. And onward we go...a peaceful rest of the weekend to everyone.
I agree that ultimately it is the Court of Public Opinion that rules the roost. The global criminals are loosing the narrative and they know it. What desperate measures can we expect from them in the coming months?
Perhaps too many of us have forgotten that, under the common law, it is a jury of one's peers that rules the roost, is it not? Isn't it about time judges stopped lying to juries about their power to nullify laws?
Youtube already transcribed it
YT's AI transcribes it, usually with many and sometimes gross mistakes. Click on the 3 vertical dots there next to the share button. But they can always remove the page.
Oh, are comments not allowed at your place?
I understand that sentiment and I guess that is the case.
Can you elaborate on the flaws in AI language transcription here or should I read about that at your place? But if I can't comment on it.......I don't know.
Anyhow, a simple test I've come up with is to type something in one language in one of these AI translation tools and then try it in reverse on that tool or another. Change languages, do this a few times and I bet you after enough iterations it would be like the game when kids whisper into the ears of the ones next to them in a circle.
What you think?
No, I don't have a comments section for my substack. It's not meant to do anything but provide updates to the list.
To make a good transcript, listen carefully with your own ears. Be willing to listen multiple times. Be honest about what you don't understand. As I say, the YT AI transcript can give you a rough idea, a very rough draft to start with, but the YT AI transcript does not distinguish who is speaking, nor does it include punctuation, and it oftentimes makes gross mistakes. Humans make mistakes, too, of course. But I think if you listen very carefully to a video, and really make an honest effort, you can make a much better transcript than can the AI. Professional transcribers use various different types of software but there is no getting around the fact that a good transcript requires human attention.
I respect that.
Thankyou.
BK
I know I could get in trouble for this, but I want to post this.....and then after I do it I guess I listen to the YouTube video assuming I can get is 2nd hand. I got a lot of attitude and I play to win.
~~~~~~~
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: In a previous video, paired with this one, Shelly explains that after her second covid jab she suffered from heart palpitations, severe chest pain, pericarditis, and deep vein thrombosis.
TRANSCRIPT
SHELLY: They sent me home with blood thinners. And then on Friday I still hadn't had word on the CT scan so I called [inaudible] Imaging and they told me to call my insurance agency or company, Premier. So I called them and Premier said, you need to go to the hospital right away. And I said, Why do I need to go to the hospital? You need a CT scan right away, we need you to go to the hospital. So I drove myself to the hospital. I get there and sure enough they do a CT scan and I had suffered a pulmonary embolism. And for any of you that don't know what it is, the blood clot in my leg then broke off, traveled up the vein through my tummy, through my heart, and into my lung. People can die from it. I was very, very fortunate that I didn't.
The next morning, they sent me, you know [holds up bottle of pills] I had the blood thinners, the next morning I woke up in severe pain and so I called paramedics and they took me back to the hospital. And I had suffered a second embolism on the way to the hospital.
So my story isn't to talk you out of getting the vaccine. I am pro-vaccine. I vaccinated my children. I got this fu*king vaccine. So it's not to tell you not to get the vaccine. But it is to tell you there are side effects and for some, some they go about with no side effects at all. But I want to tell you that I'm with you on those of you that want to wait, that you want to see how this pans out, on those of you that think this is an overreach from our government, on those of you who just plain are worried about it and want to give this some time. I am so with you. I will stand with you on that hill.
And for the rest of you, the ones, you know, the Jimmy Kimmels and those of you that are shaming the anti-vaxxers and wishing death or harm on them, I want you to look at this face, and I want you to remember my story. Because my life hasn't been the same since I had this vaccine. And it's not for everybody. Not everybody. My body, my choice, right? What I wouldn't do to exchange this bag, this basket [holds up and shakes basket full to the brim with medicines] of sh*t for my health back.
So I want you to think about those people. Think about other people's stories. Walk in their shoes. Give people grace, give people love. We need to meet in the middle here, we need to realize that each one of us comes to the table with a different set of experiences. And of course I'm going to say this vaccine sucks. But I'm not telling you to not get it. But we've got to listen to each other. I just hope that we can somehow meet in the middle here and just provide each other love. Be well everybody. Be well.
3:00
[END]
~~~~
I would like to add this edit. The above transcription comes from Transcriber B's place and I must say it is impressive and I appreciate the art of it. So, since I can't comment at Transcriber B's place, I figured I would say that here and remember the above transcription was from Transcriber B's place. It is professional and touching.
Yep. Humans make mistakes, but Nikola Tesla was right 100% of the time. You can debunk Nikola Tesla?
Hey - Transcriber B! Just subscribed to you place.
Ken
*edit - Nice Response via email.
Where? Do you have a link? Is it "in" youtube?
I don't doubt it, but presently I'm boycotting that place and I try to avoid it.
It doesn't matter really - I suspect the discourse was top notch and I'm pretty well studied as well I'd like to think......???.
Anyhow - Do your own due diligence, but by all means due diligence is demanded by justice.
Yeah of course it's in YouTube
Yt likes to ban you from commenting if you said something bad, like the truth. It happened to me too many times now. Even on chd, which shocked me.
Very frustrating.
darn!
Thank you Sasha & Katherine. One day the world will recognise both of your contributions to Truth, Ethics & Morality.
This was helpful to me. I need to understand more clearly the apparent fact that the U.S. Government, Department of Defense is in charge of the the whole "COVID vaccine drug trials" process, and is the "client of Pfizer." That fact supports my focus on the PLANdemic nature of the entire false event program.
All of this planning started many years ago, possibly as far back as the early 2000s
Today I have watched two videos, including this one, and read one Substack posting that all dealt with the same dominant theme: constant big lies being served up to we the people.
Here is the Substack posting.
https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/is-mrna-evilflawedgarbage?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Is mRNA Evil/Flawed/Garbage?
Tom Renz
Apr 22
____________
Here is the other video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xrSdd3tOUt2p/
MIKE YEADON - The Only Thing We Need to Fear is Fear Itself
_______________
I cling to the teachings of my faith to understand our miserable modern world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSIe4xLXd_M
The Miserable Modern World by Bishop Sanborn (Traditional Catholic Sermon)
19:21 video runtime
Guns Motorcycles Faith
________
And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:18
My conclusion here is that we are now just basically on our own.
All medical interventions must now be reviewed carefully.
Old tried and true medications with long track records are preferable over anything newly approved, because the approvals are now suspect.
Sad, but this appears to be the case.
Most telling: Neither "party" appears to be willing to grapple with or thoroughly investigate this debacle... except for just a few members... Ron Johnson in particular.
This also highlights the value of medical practitioners that were willing to step out of the box in favor of themselves and their patients. There are some few of those, some with publicity and retribution, and some without, and you are lucky if you have found one.
One thing to remember: Truth always wins. It make take time, sometimes a long time, and effort, sometimes a lot of effort, but truth fosters life, and lies generally foster the reverse.
Best wishes to all in difficult times.
Let me tell you what they did to Ventoline - the ubiquitous spray asthmatics use when they feel an attack coming on. I've used it for decades. It used to go down like butter. Now, it's like rocks going down - it actually can accentuate the attack for a bit then you sort of break through and flatten out....but breathing doesn't really recover entirely. This all changed around 2001. Most recently, I've had to discard three new sprays.....I can do this since in France, I'm not paying the equivalent of $200 per spray. Wondering what the %$^&# is in these sprays now. I can end up hyperventalating for hours or have my parasympathetic breathing so wrecked, I have to THINK to breath because it has been temporarily disabled. And this is just on ONE puff! Feel like there's different toxicity levels depending on the lot #, but discarding this many at a time? Looks like they've upped their game.
I'm thinking of the poor children that are being subjected to this poison and can't breath. On one of my last visits, the doctor said perhaps I have 'non-treatable' asthma. Huh??? This is the term they've now attached when Ventoline was WONDERFUL before, but now wrecks the system.
Of course I've told doctors, but they just wave me off. But I did have a respiratory tech in the hospital tell me around 2000 they changed medicines for asthma and now when people come in, they need to go through two or three treatments before they recover.
It happened to me when I had another major attack and was in the ER. The treatment that used to go down like butter felt like acid and I needed a second one to recover. That steroid punch left me unable to walk properly for two months - I was unable to stand for any length of time, my muscles were so weak.
I'm sure others are having a miserable time on their medications which are being tweaked.
While I could understand the judgement as the strict letter of the contract reading, I finally resolved what made me uneasy. In NJ this would be a clear violation of consumer protection laws. The substitution of DOD sourced vaccines for a Pharma product, represented to the public as a product manufactured with strict controls, at least as good as a blister pack of SUDAFED at CVS, is a bait-and-switch. It is called an “affirmative misrepresentation” that is punished by any judge in NJ with triple damages at the slightest whiff of fraud. VERY strict. I asked the PA DOH for a copy of the VIS. If this switch was not divulged in an FDA approved document then the violation of consumer law has occurred. I’m guessing the consumer protection laws in PA are similar, as contractors frequently do business across the state line. We can be pretty certain the VIS will not mention it. Why this could not be prosecuted under state law would be my question. If a person is said to be immune from murder under Federal law, states can negate so serious a violation of their own Constitution.
I agree that it would be good for state AGs to pursue this line of attack, and it’s one that I and others have been advocating for awhile, within the message that “people should file anything and everything they can think of, and here’s a list of possible types of cases to try.”
For example: https://5smallstones.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/potential-case-types.pdf
The bottleneck for consumer safety cases — as with most of the other cases — is the lack of willing prosecutors. I don’t think there’s a private cause of action for consumer fraud; the cases have to be brought by a public prosecutor on behalf of the public victims.
And the second bottleneck is the truth that we now know from Brook’s case: there is no “market” when it comes to the bioweapons, and there are no “consumers,” so there can’t be “consumer fraud.”
Instead of a market, what we’re operating on is a battlefield or war zone, during a war.
And militaries are under minimal obligations to notify military targets about the weapons the militaries use. In standard armed conflicts, at least over the last 50-75 years, the idea was that the parties had to abide by shared rules of engagement, and some entity interested in enforcing those, had to enforce them somehow.
But because this war is global, it’s uncharted terrain. There are no rules of engagement as far as the public knows (there may be secret UN rules of engagement, a topic I briefly explored here:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/law-of-war-war-of-law
And then a little bit more here
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/biotech-idolatry-dod-pfizer-contracts
as I began to think the pharma/DOD contracts were more relevant to the operations of the governments than any other governing-type rules or constitutions.
Under the 2001 AUMF and the subsequent amendments to US military law, though, there are no defined geographic or temporal boundaries and no legal distinctions between civilians and combatants.
So there seem to be zero obligations for any of the parties — which also aren’t defined — under any military law, to disclose the truth about the war in which they’re engaged, or the weapons they’re using.
Thank you for this detailed reply to the previous post. There’s a lot to learn! How does all this apply to other countries, eg, Australia, where I live? I certainly remember politicians saying something like we were on “a war footing.” I wonder if they used that term to dodge consumer law.
I was just talking about this with my husband. Surely if consumer laws can call for the withdrawal of a packet of frozen berries which have caused illness in a dozen people, then a drug which has caused many deaths and enormous numbers of injuries, many of which are severe and life-changing, should be withdrawn, and those responsible should be punished for pushing these drugs as safe and effective. I’m in Australia and we have deaths and injuries here of course, like anywhere else. We want justice!
"after doing all this research and analysis it became very clear that ... suing pharmaceutical manufacturers under the false claims act was...a fool's errand" @5:30
Yes! This is a genocide.
We don't need to talk so much anymore about how their weapons work.
We need to talk about how to end the genocide.
I have no idea under what circumstances they could dismiss Brook Jackson’s case as as a person who has been involved in DoD testing back in the early and mid 60’s and as a participant and subject over the years with Pharma companies her information was to my experience true and correct.
Reading the information she had was similar to many occasions where the statistics and the rabbit holes that should have been explored and would have kept many of the SAE’s from occurring.
This won’t stop until people rise up and stop donating $$ to the politicians and decide to be critical thinkers about the information that the media and Pharma put out. Read the data and look at the statistics.
Even those that lack a lot of statistics exposure should be able to ask does this really add up? Does it really sound right? Does it sound as fishy as it feels?
Yes it is, Brook and the many who helped investigating the Pfizer data and hopefully Moderna as well, verify the work they all have done and for the people who have brought the info forward to Substack.
Don’t let them off the hook - politicians who have bought and paid for and as well the alphabet government groups and their leaders. Total baloney and BS has been the last three years.
Ms. Mohamed did an excellent job of conducting this interview. I searched for more information regarding her activities, and here is an example of Ms. Mohamed's clarity of thought regarding the World Health Organizations ongoing racketeering operations. >
Shabnam Palesa Mohamed on the WHO and the Way Forward
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5U9yD_A_bY
Ms. Mohamed is also executive director and chapter coordinator of Children’s Health Defense Africa, as a steering committee member of World Council for Health.
Thank you Sasha for all of your hard work and due diligence in explaining how the entire Covid plandemic and the history of how the toxic covid shots came about. More people are understanding what happened and what's still happening, that the governments in the US and worldwide are still trying to cover up the crime scenes. But, there's no way to continue to try and hide the bodies. Once we see the light there's no way we can undo that. Keep up the great work and I will continue to share your pieces.
A fascinating and important discussion, thank you.
great interview, vital information, thank you. Link below contains strong educational message to the public https://rumble.com/v2fwcxu-opening-statements-day-3-toronto-national-citizens-inquiry.html
It is indeed unfortunate that some of the USA primadonna reporters like Tucker, Sean, etc seem unable to anything like the wonderful presentation by this South African presenter. Shame on them all. As more normies lose family and friends and wake up we will stop this outrage from happening again. Sasha and Katherine have unearthed the incontrovertible evidence documenting the complete DOD operation. NO MORE SHOTS!
Is there a transcript of this conversation?
Lately I hesitate to click "YouTube"......although I make exceptions if I can view it 2nd hand.
If there isn't a transcript, maybe somebody should make one.
Maybe there is a Rumble link?
*edit: frankly I'm not sure that Rumble is not slowly making a heel turn, too, but YT is for sure captured.
Hey Saga Hana - not to get off-base here, but I have one suggestion. In the message you sent with my chosen subscription there was a one-stop link to "unsubscribe" and while I appreciate being able to unsubscribe, I just chose to subscribe, so I don't think you should throw that out there from a marketing standpoint....it makes me wonder......just a friendly suggestion from the son of the Director of Marketing in his day!
All in good fun I hope you appreciate.
Ken
Here is from the Substack settings page:
------
"Opt out message on the welcome page
The message that is shown at the bottom of the welcome page that allows visitors to choose not to subscribe at that moment."
-------
Don't know. Substack is not the most intuitive set up, I still struggle with finding my owns subscriptions list.
OK, for me what I did was go to the "Dashboard" page, then click on the "Settings" tab and then there was a place to "Edit" the welcome email. So, I did that, and what I think is the case is that you have an older "grandfathered" template. Probably all you need to do is "Edit" it and then the easy unsubscribe link won't be there.
That is what I think may be the case and since I'm not sure - free of charge! Ha, ha.
Ken
*edit - you know I went to my own message and it needed a few edits, and then I made the edits. So I'm glad we have had this conversation and if you want my opinion you can rest assured I will share it!
Hmmm...my "welcome email" page is completely blank. getting flashbacks to how I set this up last year.
Anyway, thanks, I think I'll just leave it as is and if people want to come read they can do so, sub or no! 😅
You know what Sage Hana - we are buried deep in this conversation so it could be the browser you are using is not up to date. Anyhow, it probably isn't worth any consternation and it was just a suggestion on my end.....
I'm glad we discussed it because on my end I updated my welcome message and while at some time in the future I hope to have over 100 subscribers my intent is never to ask for anybody to contribute because I don't really need the money and if I got paid I might feel sort of obligated to provide content and that just doesn't work with my disposition.
Hopefully SubStack realizes authors such as myself ought be allowed to be part of the community and not be treated as "2nd Class writers" just because they don't entail nor desire financial transactions at their SubStack place. I say this because I think if the geniuses behind SubStack are "wise" they will realize that authors sharing my sentiment not to ask for any payment add to the "richness" of the place as a whole - to the benefit of those who choose to write and those who choose to read whether they pay or not. Of course, it ought be evident that SubStack provide a forum for writers and if I don't have any funds coming into the place, I would understand if there was a nominal fee to pay for the forum services to give writers who don't desire "currency" for a chance to express views freely.
I think I'm going to look into this and then talk to you direct at your place.....we all are learning together I reckon.
Ken
Hmmm...will check into this.
I think those are pre-programmed by Substack.
You have the option to send a thank you email, which is auto-generated. Will check. thanks, Ken!
Well, I just got a response from Transcriber B above, and the "unsubscribe" option was there, but it was not highlighted in any way....just a friendly suggestion and based on what I've already read I'm looking forward to being a subscriber - for free at first is my policy, but after awhile, I like to contribute financially to writers I support.
I genuinely do not know how to modify this! 😅 Thank you for reading, and hope you enjoy the content.
If you want, I will try to figure it out and get back to you at your place maybe!
It ain't no big deal.
To be honest, I don't even know what my "response" says - I edited some things and it could be you have an "older" version - who knows....things are in such flux. Hopefully the flux has peaked for the time being - I hope so.
I look forward to reading what you express at your place - your SubStack place.
BK
You know, I'd be willing to make a transcript of it and I think I could be pretty accurate, but I just not assume watch YT - maybe an MP3 file or some such of it could be made, but it is easier to transcript if you can see the video. I'm really pretty sure I would be quite capable of doing this and accurate as well. Of course, the fee would be commensurate.....or some such...
ha, ha, ha...
BK
*edit: I'm not exactly sure how to say this, but your post made me think about something I had forgotten - so, I decided to Subscribe to you place for the time being! Thanks.