From this and other comments of yours, it seems that not only did you not read the book, but you even did not watch the video at the top of this page. Having arrived at this conclusion, I consider it pointless to continue this discussion.
From this and other comments of yours, it seems that not only did you not read the book, but you even did not watch the video at the top of this page. Having arrived at this conclusion, I consider it pointless to continue this discussion.
I did watch the video, but see no reason to read the book if the points I have raised above are not addressed. Your scenario remains implausible if it cannot convincingly explain mushroom clouds, miles of damaged buildings surrouding the fire zones, and the distinct absence of hundreds of these things:
From this and other comments of yours, it seems that not only did you not read the book, but you even did not watch the video at the top of this page. Having arrived at this conclusion, I consider it pointless to continue this discussion.
I did watch the video, but see no reason to read the book if the points I have raised above are not addressed. Your scenario remains implausible if it cannot convincingly explain mushroom clouds, miles of damaged buildings surrouding the fire zones, and the distinct absence of hundreds of these things:
https://allthatsinteresting.com/firebombing-of-tokyo#33
Regardless of this disagreement, I am grateful for your work in Covid-related research; it is sorely needed and greatly appreciated.