Nukes are fake. Explosive nuclear bombs do no exist. You don’t need nuclear bombs to make war horrendous. I do not watch earnest reports on impossibilities.
Nukes are fake. Explosive nuclear bombs do no exist. You don’t need nuclear bombs to make war horrendous. I do not watch earnest reports on impossibilities.
I think we all have seen the gigantic mushroom cloud evidence of H bomb tests in the Pacific. These bombs do exist, and they are terrifying, just as much as conventional bombing is also terrifying.
We’ve seen pictures of mushroom clouds, most likely created in the Lookout Mountain Air Force studios in Hollywood. Search for images “bikini atoll nuke”. I’ll let you explain to me how a car sized bomb in 10 meters of water can produce a wide, vertical, nearly perfect column of water, steam, and energy. You can’t. You can’t explain how three WTC buildings fell at free fall into their own foot print by being struck with two planes. We have all been lied to. If you are not willing to investigate you should probably STFU.
When trying to win someone over to your side, I'd probably keep the invective to a minimum, but yes, people assume a mushroom cloud is indisputable evidence of a nuclear explosion, when there is plenty of archival evidence of the behavior of large scale conventional explosives, specifically all the government tests from the "nuclear" age when they were running simulations with thousands of tons of TNT.
Have you ever seen the Galen Winsor video? He gives a good talk, and makes a pretty thought provoking demonstration at the end. Definitely worth watching in full. https://youtu.be/rMqHTbXm3rs
Same here, I can relate, so most of the time I'm probably subconsciously lecturing myself on how to behave :) It's really good to see people taking this subject seriously. There's a 99% chance it's just another fraud they've used to mentally enslave and scare us with. The US taxpayers fed and supported the USSR, so they were false ideological opposition and a fake threat. They never contradicted us on our space program, even though scarcely half of Americans even believed we landed on the moon at the time, so imaginary enemies and their requisite huge spending requirements have always been the order of the day, the money not going into big research projects, but straight into the pockets of the bankster. Even the giant "defense" industry with all their obscene technology is mostly a jerk-off, just siphoning money. Cheers, friend
FYI. When people are discussing one controversial and contentious subject and drag in another one casually like this - "You can’t explain how three WTC buildings fell at free fall into their own foot print by being struck with two planes." - that has no relevance, I immediately switch off, I turn your volume to 0. If you are emotional and can't stick to the critical path now, why and how should I believe were focused when investigating the atomic bombs?
Maybe I simply have better things to do than spend my life speculating about things that are long lost in the distant past and really are better buried anyway? Sure there are secrets and myths: but lets leave those to the Sherlock Holmes types, because it make zero difference to me if Marilyn Monroe assassinated JR using a lead candlestick in the billiard room.
Some have an agenda. The Air Force Technical Application Center (AFTAC) quietly monitors the world detecting nuclear events via multiple means. Has done so since '47 detecting Joe-1 (1949).
I understand your take. I try to keep and open mind. Even to those sides of the argument I don't agree with.
The "myth" of nuclear weapons is a good tool to herd the people along for the rich to get richer is one way to look at it. I hope you are right and there are no nuclear weapons. I trust John Pilger. If you can provide links that show him to be a fraud I would appreciate opening my eyes.
Not saying he is a fraud. Honest People can firmly believe in a narrative that just is not true. I’ve given up on trying to figure out the motives of people. It’s better to examine nature. Nature never lies.
Please see the linked documentary by John Pilger. He was on the ground at Bikini Atoll and interviewed the Pacific Islander impacted by the nuclear blasts including several Hydrogen bomb tests.
William Irwin Thompson (now deceased) is the first person I know of to provide documentary evidence that spent uranium munitions used in the Iraq war caused horrifically deformed babies. It was horrific for me to see the images.
I have provided links to documentary work showing these horrors, else where in the comments thread.
Look at online photos of nuclear tests at bikini atoll and elsewhere. No under water explosion would make such a wide and tall column of water, steam and gas go straight up. So much real evidence that nukes are fake. No radioactive elements found at Hiroshima or Nagasaki
Nukes are fake. Explosive nuclear bombs do no exist. You don’t need nuclear bombs to make war horrendous. I do not watch earnest reports on impossibilities.
I think we all have seen the gigantic mushroom cloud evidence of H bomb tests in the Pacific. These bombs do exist, and they are terrifying, just as much as conventional bombing is also terrifying.
We’ve seen pictures of mushroom clouds, most likely created in the Lookout Mountain Air Force studios in Hollywood. Search for images “bikini atoll nuke”. I’ll let you explain to me how a car sized bomb in 10 meters of water can produce a wide, vertical, nearly perfect column of water, steam, and energy. You can’t. You can’t explain how three WTC buildings fell at free fall into their own foot print by being struck with two planes. We have all been lied to. If you are not willing to investigate you should probably STFU.
When trying to win someone over to your side, I'd probably keep the invective to a minimum, but yes, people assume a mushroom cloud is indisputable evidence of a nuclear explosion, when there is plenty of archival evidence of the behavior of large scale conventional explosives, specifically all the government tests from the "nuclear" age when they were running simulations with thousands of tons of TNT.
Have you ever seen the Galen Winsor video? He gives a good talk, and makes a pretty thought provoking demonstration at the end. Definitely worth watching in full. https://youtu.be/rMqHTbXm3rs
Thanks for the link. I plant seeds and some days I’m a grumpy old farmer.
Same here, I can relate, so most of the time I'm probably subconsciously lecturing myself on how to behave :) It's really good to see people taking this subject seriously. There's a 99% chance it's just another fraud they've used to mentally enslave and scare us with. The US taxpayers fed and supported the USSR, so they were false ideological opposition and a fake threat. They never contradicted us on our space program, even though scarcely half of Americans even believed we landed on the moon at the time, so imaginary enemies and their requisite huge spending requirements have always been the order of the day, the money not going into big research projects, but straight into the pockets of the bankster. Even the giant "defense" industry with all their obscene technology is mostly a jerk-off, just siphoning money. Cheers, friend
FYI. When people are discussing one controversial and contentious subject and drag in another one casually like this - "You can’t explain how three WTC buildings fell at free fall into their own foot print by being struck with two planes." - that has no relevance, I immediately switch off, I turn your volume to 0. If you are emotional and can't stick to the critical path now, why and how should I believe were focused when investigating the atomic bombs?
I plant seeds. Grasses grow in the cracks of concrete sidewalks
Maybe. But there is still no need for words like "If you are not willing to investigate you should probably STFU".
Maybe I simply have better things to do than spend my life speculating about things that are long lost in the distant past and really are better buried anyway? Sure there are secrets and myths: but lets leave those to the Sherlock Holmes types, because it make zero difference to me if Marilyn Monroe assassinated JR using a lead candlestick in the billiard room.
Ha ha.
Some have an agenda. The Air Force Technical Application Center (AFTAC) quietly monitors the world detecting nuclear events via multiple means. Has done so since '47 detecting Joe-1 (1949).
I understand your take. I try to keep and open mind. Even to those sides of the argument I don't agree with.
The "myth" of nuclear weapons is a good tool to herd the people along for the rich to get richer is one way to look at it. I hope you are right and there are no nuclear weapons. I trust John Pilger. If you can provide links that show him to be a fraud I would appreciate opening my eyes.
be well
Not saying he is a fraud. Honest People can firmly believe in a narrative that just is not true. I’ve given up on trying to figure out the motives of people. It’s better to examine nature. Nature never lies.
Please see the linked documentary by John Pilger. He was on the ground at Bikini Atoll and interviewed the Pacific Islander impacted by the nuclear blasts including several Hydrogen bomb tests.
William Irwin Thompson (now deceased) is the first person I know of to provide documentary evidence that spent uranium munitions used in the Iraq war caused horrifically deformed babies. It was horrific for me to see the images.
I have provided links to documentary work showing these horrors, else where in the comments thread.
The presenter notes retinal damage to soldiers who observed tests in 50s. You seem to be mistaken.
Look at online photos of nuclear tests at bikini atoll and elsewhere. No under water explosion would make such a wide and tall column of water, steam and gas go straight up. So much real evidence that nukes are fake. No radioactive elements found at Hiroshima or Nagasaki