180 Comments
User's avatar
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Thank you, Ms. Latypova, for your tireless work. The Grace Schara verdict is simply nauseating.

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

Please tell us what happened in the Grace Sahara trial! I have not heard a thing yet.

Thank you Sasha.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Ascension won the verdict. The Schara’s did not.

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

Unbelievably heartbreaking. Shame on that jury. I smell something very fishy.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

I concur. It is a very dangerous place we have come to when there is no accountability for such an egregious act. I provide care for a young woman with Druvet Syndrome and she is just as “important” as anyone else in this world. Perhaps more so than the psychos running this joint as she is a loving and pure soul. Mr. Schara and his family know well that Grace was the same sort of soul.

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

Yes. And to think that these evil acts are carried out in hospitals by people who are sworn to do no harm. I’m completely gobsmacked.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

But I did hear an accounting of a doctor who injected saline into patients so they could see their loved ones in hospital, go to work, attend college and he is facing 35 years in prison so I do not think we are the “freedom train” nation we have been lead to believe. Legal to kill but not to preserve life? Seriously?

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

And that would be the reason I am not a fan of MAHA. Entrusting our health to “government” issued protocols is a very bad idea. Personally, I have zero faith in institutions at this juncture and fully believe that we need to take care of our own health. But I am the one who walks around wearing a Non-Compliant t-shirt so take my opinion with that in mind. I determined the overhead rate for federally sponsored research some years ago, pre-pandemic, and trust it not in the least.

Expand full comment
Ava Grandley's avatar

True and they are doing this to everyone, especially, the elderly

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Yes, they are. My roommate’s healthy elderly parents were both dead within 6 months of receiving the injections. I doled out The Injection Fraud by Solari Report and Dissolving Illusions like candy. However, we are not exactly a nation of readers any longer so only a couple of people actually read them.

Expand full comment
bj jp's avatar

what a nice compassionate person and world view u have...bless you

Expand full comment
Tom Karnes's avatar

Fishy, as in Mickey mouse Kangaroo court, yea that's a different kettle of fish, we are all in this together and the legal monopoly is weaponized against us

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

If I ever start my own law firm, I am calling it Bitches In Britches. That’s on court record and taxpayers had to pay for that bit of nonsense. Yay America. Something to consider every time we hit a pothole….we spent money on that instead of fixing the damn roads.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Yeah, I spent 10 years in the Night Court system so I definitely agree with you. Thankfully, I can read. No one was more surprised than I to “discover” in the discovery process that I am Hispanic when, in fact, my family came to America on the Mayflower and County Cork. Our Just-Us system does not really provide Justice. I bought law books and did legal work myself as I was not paying some unkempt clown to do my legal work for me. I hear you!

Expand full comment
BAwls's avatar

Wow, good for you. No doubt you would love/ have heard of Dolores Cahill's titanic battle against the legal system -- or , more accurately using the legal system FOR US.

https://rumble.com/v6uy2cv-professor-dolores-cahill.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Whatever this “system” is, it sucks. That’s my big MENSA word of the day….sucks.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

I am vaguely familiar with her name from the beginning of the scamdemic but I will look into her further. Thank you for the recommendation. I did learn that there is “hell to pay” if one does not go along to get along. I am beyond caring about that because I am watching people die or be ruined in myriad ways. I am no longer go along to get along material. I’ll just be the one wearing my Non-Compliant collection of t-shirts rather than Brooks Brothers so everyone knows exactly who I am. I did love Brooks Brothers, not even gonna lie but I am not willing to hurt people for high end clothing.

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

Only way to stop it is to refuse the shots. Don’t we have Nuremberg “ laws” protecting us from forced injections? 🤨

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

So...here's the thing. Back in 2021, when this was happening, I "thought" Nuremberg would help, but,it holds no legal weight. So a lot of people either quit their jobs/or get the shot. But when we know the laws of the constitution — and how to apply them — we're more able to resist whatever tyranny comes our way, simply on philosophical or religious standing: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-to-use-religious-exemptions-to

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar
1dEdited

I quit my nursing job 2009 because of svine flu injections they wanted to impose ( in Sweden) a job I loved but I love my health even more.

I didn’t know then I would find a better job for a better pay 🥰🙏

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

This is truly a blessing! An amazing miracle! How what's meant for darkness brings for light! So happy to hear this and thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment
Toddy's avatar

God is Light and in Him is no darkness at all.

In Him was life and that life was the Light of men.

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

some take the shot to keep the job, I was ready to die to fight for my freedom actually 🤨

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

that experience helped me to understand that some blessings come in disguise. Like here I thought it was a terrible loss but it was the contrary. I just needed to keep the faith 🙏

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

The U.S., Russia & China do not subscribe to the International Criminal Court; and no other country that does, has taken any action against the covid measures; other than against Israel for their vaccine passport; of which they cancelled in order to avoid their case from reaching the ICC. https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuremberg-20-recognized-by-ai-russell-crowe-movie-nuremberg

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Chief Justice. You are eminently correct. The International Criminal Court is a ruse. The court has no jurisdiction unless the signatory State accepts and signs an legally initiated proceeding. The United Nations construct is much the same as the "legal" confabulation known as the United States. As Chairman Mao Zedong once said" "The United States is a paper tiger"...

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

DISTRICT COURT AT THE HAGUE RULED COVID MEASURES "ILLEGAL" & "NOT AN EMERGENCY" FT ICC FAIL? https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/icc-court-at-the-hague-ruled-covid

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello FBD. Refusing the injections is 'planned' to become an act of domestic terrorism. Zero exemptions are offered by criminal cartels posing as our 'legal' *governments*. The Nuremberg Code is little more than a theatrical script offered to assuage the terrors of the trembling proletariat. Here's an interesting Legal notice penned by Jerry Day a few years ago: - CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF VACCINATION -

- AGREEMENT BETWEEN VACCINE PROVIDERS AND VACCINATED PARTY - >>> Opening Statement: “Herein the terms “administration” and “administrators” refers to all parties providing and/or “mandating” vaccine services and products including vaccine Manufacturers, Marketers, Lobbyists, Distributors, Hospitals, Clinics, Physicians, Nurses, Government Agents and Agencies, Healthcare Providers, Elected Officials, Enforcement Persons, Agencies and Programs, and all other parties bringing “mandated” vaccines to application or to market in any way.” The list is inclusive. >>> Please comprehend the *intent* of the document, as the intent is to place legal liability on the attending medical practitioner. It is NOT offered as voluntary subjugation to physical assault. Read the document carefully. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.freedomtaker.com%2Fdownloaddocuments%2FVaccinationNotice_v3.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

Expand full comment
Monica Copeland's avatar

Wow. Thank you for the link. This reminds me of Section 3024, within the 21st Century Cures Act, "Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards."

It essentially removes the patients' right to informed consent for clinical studies or when informed consent is not deemed to be in the patient's best interest. Who, though, decides our best interest? Answer: all of the above referenced in your comment.

I believe that this is among the primary reasons why the shots never made it out of the EUA clinical study stage, as then, Informed Consent would have been required. As well, the FDA's own Scope of Study for BioNTech and Comirnity state within its 27 page document that their studies (human trials) will not conclude until August 2027. That said, Sasha is very much correct in stating that this is not at all over. None of their chanted Safe and Effective mantra holds weight when you look behind their curtain of purposed deceit.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Monica Copeland. I believe Mr. Day's proposal is brilliant, as it puts the signatory on notice that they themselves are legally subject to "Remedy".

The current mafia system alleges that no contract signatures by the victim can be construed as acceptance of whatever 'legal' construct they failed to acknowledge. The legal fiction is construed as Implicit compliance, rather than an explicit notice of contract. Our judicial and enforcement systems are ALL corrupt to the core and need to be forcibly vacated... I digress.

Thank you for commenting.

Expand full comment
bj jp's avatar

that would be nice...where is ICE when it comes to the medical cabal🤣

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

In my mind I just think “ it’s not gonna happen baby “ and I stick to it.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

The U.S., Russia & China do not subscribe to the International Criminal Court; and no other country that does, has taken any action against the covid measures; other than against Israel for their vaccine passport; of which they cancelled in order to avoid their case from reaching the ICC. https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuremberg-20-recognized-by-ai-russell-crowe-movie-nuremberg

Expand full comment
James Wayne's avatar

What we're learning is that this government will tell you what rights you have and don't have, and it will tell you what any given right actually means.

When the Constitution refused to stipulate remedies for gov't abuse and perfidy, then it resulted in an eventual Open Season on everyone outside of gov't.

I'm convinced that Jabb-drones will be hovering outside our doors to effect Jabb compliance in 7-15 years... or maybe they'll just drop trillions of Jabb-Carrier mosquitos onto us, like they're already doing on a smaller scale.

They're not going to tolerate anyone resisting their "Health" Utopia.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Yes and No. The U.S., Russia & China do not subscribe to the International Criminal Court; and no other country that does, has taken any action against the covid measures; other than against Israel for their vaccine passport; of which they cancelled in order to avoid their case from reaching the ICC. https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuremberg-20-recognized-by-ai-russell-crowe-movie-nuremberg

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

It's pretty odd that this Palantir thing is being publicized.

They have been doing all of this stuff behind the scenes for at least a decade already. Why did they not just keep them in the background?

Perhaps the intent is to keep us afraid and paranoid.

That would explain why they are also blabbing a lot about neuralink and other vaporware like genetic engineering and gain of function.

If they could create a deadly virus, they would have. But, they cannot and that's why now they use it to create fear.

Last night, I heard that the UK is warning that enemies can block out the sun via geoengineering. But just a few months ago in April, the UK offered $50m to figure out how to do this.

This is what I gather from this:

-they still don't know how to block the sun

-then they used it to create fear of enemies doing it, but how exactly could enemies do this without being detected in violating UK airspace?

Fear and paranoia are the goal.

It reminds me of what they intended COVID to accomplish.... Turn us into cognitive zombies.

But they failed as they couldn't really make a deadly disease and had to hype up the "flu".

https://robc137.substack.com/p/covid

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Control , Money and depopulation is the goal . Thank you every single day for your efforts.

Expand full comment
Monica Copeland's avatar

This reminds me of a quote from German historian and philosopher, Hannah Arendt:

"This constant lying is not aimed at making the people believe a lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything anymore.

A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies cannot distinguish between right and wrong. And such a people, deprived of the power to think and judge, is, without knowing and willing it, completely subjected to the rule of lies.

With such a people, you can do whatever you want."

Obama paraphrased her thoughts in a now difficult to find speech on flooding the media with SO much information that people no longer know what to think about anything, and thus, can be persuaded to believe everything.

The overwhelm is intentional.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

No. When you have 99.99% of Republican's believing that Salt is dirty and Oil & Coal is "Clean", you don't need anyone lying. You just need a brain. For example:1) I can't find one person that sees the oil and gas strewn all over the parking lots and roads "they can't see it". 2) I can't find one person that sees the sign at the gas pump that's been there your entire life that says "known to cause cancer and birth defects". Even when you show them the petro-waste eating holes in the concrete, they still can't see it. Or, show them a picture of the sign at the gas pump. They can't see that either. It's not that they are saying it. It's that -you- believe it. Louisiana bill would redefine gas as ‘green’ amid Trump energy push https://www.the-independent.com/climate-change/louisiana-bill-gas-energy-trump-b2773446.html

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Thanks for this.

It reminds me of what they intended COVID to accomplish.... Turn us into cognitive zombies.

But they failed as they couldn't really make a deadly disease and had to hype up the "flu".

https://robc137.substack.com/p/covid

Expand full comment
Monica Copeland's avatar

Exactly. Its like the common cold just faded into obscurity and no one questioned it. Mattias Desmet was on point with his book, 'Mass Formation Psychosis'. Its frightening how many people went along with the narrative with just as much conviction as their lack of reason. I can't help to believe that we are living within a gargantuan long-play of Hegel's Dialectic. Even with the current charade of opposing forces and political upheavel, I suspect that all of their social-engineering is going according to plan. Whose plan, though? That's the question. I only recently learned about the Payseur Family. We tend to think of Vanguard and Blackrock as the most diabolically evil entities, but there are yet darker forces behind the veil. I'm sure there are more. Their united success is wholly predicated upon our division, tribalism, and media influenced segregation. I refuse to play.

Expand full comment
Usamnesia's avatar

That O-BOMB-a speech was given at an event “hosted by Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center about disinformation’s threat to democracy — called for governments and tech companies to better protect users”

Another guardrail entity already having shown itself to be untrustworthy. It’s comical that the professional liars have been exposed so they develop many of these fact checking orgs to mitigate the damage. It’s a bit

Late for that so their next step is force.

Expand full comment
Suzanne O'Keeffe's avatar

Fear is the weapon and the desired outcome. Fear is what keeps us stuck in their narratives creating the dystopia they program us with. When enough of us choose courage, their narratives, and thus their power, will just collapse, like the trans freakout Taibbi just wrote about ...

https://www.racket.news/p/the-great-disappearing-trans-freakout

Expand full comment
c morrow's avatar

Thank you for posting this! I’ve never seen the true background in preparation for Covid pandemic! This really shows how they programmed us slow slowly, but surely taking little steps and deceiving us so they would be ready to throw that fear out and make us follow like sheep! Wow, this is really powerful thank you. Thank you for posting !🌺🦋

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

Most welcome- please pass it around.

Parts One and Two cover the history from 1999-2019.

Part Three of that chronology covers 2020 on a day by day month by month basis. Here is the first installation of that piece which covers the month of January:

https://healthfreedomdefense.org/timeline-to-covid-tyranny-part-three-2020-jan/

Here is the second installation of that piece which covers the month of February:

https://healthfreedomdefense.org/timeline-to-covid-tyranny-part-three-2020-feb/

As one can see if they go through the chronology there literally was nothing happening even as told by the mainstream media stories. They simply made it up.

The March 2020 edition will be published next week.

Expand full comment
c morrow's avatar

I appreciate you doing all this research! Thank you thank you this will definitely help me if I ever get to sue. I want to sue the government so bad but I’m looking for someone. I’m actually damaged by the murder shot , Moderna jab. There are so many suffering from the damage of the shot and only got two shots! I’ve got lots of friends and family that got the boosters too so they’re really suffering! And dying daily! It’s so sad about Grace SCHARA case being found not guilty against the hospital killing her down syndrome child with an illegal DNR a Call! It’s just amazing what they’re getting away with but God sees that he does! I don’t know what God’s gonna do about it because God is holy and way above my pay grade! But he’s a good God! Thank you thank you🙏🦋🔥

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

One of the biggest problems facing the financial parasites who currently 'run the show' in the US/UK/EU is unfunded liabilities. The pension systems are broke. How to make an immediate and large-scale impact on these unfunded liabilities while setting in motion numerous other long sought objectives? They would never do that would they? Some people are afraid to face these realities.

I think it is impossible to escape the conclusion that part of the Covid tyranny was to eliminate large chunks of the elderly who are on fixed pensions. The pension system in Europe is completely broke and it has been projected that that system will accrue somewhere around $70 trillion more in debt over the next 10 years with the current level of pensioners. The US pension system is projected to be completely broke by 2027.

Anyone who thinks the power brokers at the top of the financial systems don't look at this and understand the dire problems this poses for their financial empires is kidding themselves. Anyone who thinks that these parasites won't do "whatever it takes" to maintain that system and their power is naive. Blackrock-Vanguard-State Street own the world. Wall St-BIS-Bank of London move the money. Look there for the answer. All of this easily accomplished- incentives, coercion and mandatory protocols.

Watch the 17:15-18:15 mark:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aE2HF0jwJo

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello again Allen. You stated: "Anyone who thinks that these parasites won't do "whatever it takes" to maintain that system and their power is naive. Blackrock-Vanguard-State Street own the world. Wall St-BIS-Bank of London move the money. Look there for the answer."

Right on target. *Investment* advisors think nothing of snuffing tens of millions of citizens. People have become objects - "Things" in the way.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Allen. I just reviewed the entire series by Michael Bryant and Health Freedom Defense. Wow! The details of timelines and multiple links to source material are stunning. I only scanned the articles, as I have been following the 'process' for many years. I hope other readers follow your links. Excellent source material. Thanks.

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar
1dEdited

French “ resident “ , you know,, that trojan horse named Macron is now suggesting forced injections on all + 65 years old citizens in France. Both against flu and covid. I knew the guy is totally fucked up in the head, am just surprised that nobody in France seems to know it too.. 🤨. To force elder people to take shots is to put them at risk for “euthanasia”. This guy wants all old people to die before they retire and cash in their retirement. . It’s a part of his agenda.

He is currently working very hard to implement euthanasia. Free euthanasia in French laws. Covid shots and lockdowns didn’t kill enough old people so more measures are needed to accelerate the process.

As he is working for Big Pharma, am afraid BPh might engineer a special cocktail for the 65+ …🫣

Expand full comment
Gumnut123's avatar

Macrons wife is 72years old?

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

You mean michael his husband!? 😂

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

but she has 3 kids allegedly, where do those come from? 😳 if not from her legs? 🤨

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

yes and he is 24 years younger than her. He’s the baby in that family where everyone is older than him. In spite of him being the father’s figure..he’s the youngest 🫣 🤣.

Expand full comment
Givenroom's avatar

Macronsky, Zionsky, Zitrumsky who stole their bloody rare earths? Napoleon Macron is more president of a crumbling Ukr than a French President….which is going down also, prime minister sex scandals, police officers raping raped women, a surgeon abusing 300 patients, and the corporations that haven’t gone broke, 66 thousands now all fleeing to sugar daddy US.

Expand full comment
FBD's avatar

He is more a «  Caligula » than a Napoleon. Napoleon had real genius, unfortunately too big ego. But he was a real genius.

Makron is just an empty suit with a big mouth, old French ladies like him..he’s so cuuuute 🙄 that’s why they voted for him. For that gigolo..

Expand full comment
Givenroom's avatar

He’s real, a real WEF young leader, a Rothschild banker, a Pfizer attaché, a globalist, a Zionist, a lot of French have said it in his face, Mr. Macron you’re too much a Jew and too little a French Citoyen, you’re the President of some French Riviera resort with casinos coming to Gaza.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

The World Leaders spent our retirements.

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Continued thanks for continuing to awaken lions, Sasha.

Rhetorically speaking: What's the difference between murdering innocents in the hospital on video vs. murdering innocents in Germany, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, S. America, C. America, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan.

Same demonic swamp, and they seem to relish in the killing, on and off camera.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

All political ambitions include retroactive birth control. Few seem to take notice...

- Paul Vonharnish - (10/27/2023)

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

Thanks for your continued emphasis on these truths, Sasha. You are one of few truth tellers, the "resistance" is controlled to a great extent and it takes insight to distinguish the two sides.

The verdict in Grace's trial is incomprehensible. I hope it is not a fresh trauma for the family.

Expand full comment
Scaler Wave's avatar

One huge psyop and millions of clueless sheep who don't even realize that all they have to say is no... sad

Expand full comment
Kavita's avatar

Thank you, Sasha. This is such a great educative presentation for folks who've already covered the material as well as for those who struggle to grasp the military / gov't connection.

I'm somewhat itinerant right now; haven't re-posted your last few Substacks but deeply appreciate reading them and recommending to others.

Thanks also for shining a light on Grace Schara's case. It's unsurprising (sadly) that the case 'lost', though I sense the case is instrumental in ways we don't fathom / can't yet see and that brings some measure of succor. Grace is an instrument of Love and a source of inspiration to me and so, so many others. Her work and play continues.

Expand full comment
Heather Oxtot's avatar

Trial by jury is the last bastion for justice in a corporate world. What happened? Were they coerced by the judge into believing their hands were tied as per “laws”? How could they disregard the evidence for murder without holding medical staff liable?

Expand full comment
Suzanne O'Keeffe's avatar

Courts have long been lost as a consistent path of "justice" ... long before we were born.

https://archive.org/details/ImperialismInAmerica/page/n3/mode/2up

A dispatch from Wall Street quoted in Chicago Daily Press dated March 21, 1892,

as reported in Imperialism In America: Its Rise and Progress, Sarah E. V. Emery, 1893, p 72.

"Capital must protect itself in every possible manner, through combination and legislation. The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed— through the influence of the strong arm of government— applied by a central power of imperial wealth under the control of leading financiers. A people without homes will not quarrel with their rulers. History repeats itself in regular circles; this truth is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capital to govern the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a condition of political antagonism."

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Suzanne. Excellent quote. Too bad modern education has removed students ability to read and comprehend text... They ask their cell phones which direction is North...

Expand full comment
Monica Copeland's avatar

Agree. I had not seen this before, and am grateful to have been exposed. Thank you, Suzanne!

Expand full comment
Monica Copeland's avatar

I just looked up the term 'political antagonism' and this result was quickly returned. This sounds A LOT like everything we are continuing to experience today.

Political antagonism refers to a deep-seated and often irreconcilable conflict between political groups, where opposing sides view each other as enemies and are unwilling to compromise or recognize the legitimacy of the other's views. It goes beyond mere political disagreement and can manifest as a willingness to treat the opposing side as a threat, potentially leading to social and political instability.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Key Characteristics of Political Antagonism:

"Us" vs. "Them" mentality:

Antagonism fosters a sense of division where political opponents are seen as fundamentally different and incompatible.

Dehumanization:

Highly polarized individuals may dehumanize their opponents, viewing them as less than human or as inherently flawed.

Denial of legitimacy:

Antagonistic groups may refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the other side's political claims or even their right to participate in the political process.

Fueling conflict:

Political actors and rhetoric can deliberately exacerbate antagonism by instrumentalizing opposition and promoting intergroup conflict.

Erosion of democratic norms:

When antagonism becomes deeply entrenched, it can undermine democratic principles like compromise, tolerance, and respect for opposing viewpoints.

Examples of Political Antagonism:

"Culture wars":

Antagonistic rhetoric and actions can be seen in "culture wars" where deeply ingrained social and political values are pitted against each other.

Partisan polarization:

In many countries, political parties have become increasingly polarized, with little willingness to cooperate or find common ground.

Nationalist populism:

Some nationalist populist movements have thrived on antagonism, creating a sense of "us" against "them" and scapegoating minority groups or outsiders.

Social media and online communication:

Online platforms can amplify political antagonism by facilitating the spread of misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric.

Consequences of Political Antagonism:

Erosion of trust:

Antagonism can erode social trust, making it harder for people to cooperate and work together.

Political instability:

When political antagonism becomes extreme, it can lead to political instability and even violence.

Undermining democratic institutions:

Antagonism can weaken democratic institutions by eroding public trust and making it harder to resolve political disputes.

Social division:

Political antagonism can exacerbate social divisions and create a more hostile and divided society.

Contrast with Agonism:

It's important to distinguish antagonism from agonism. Agonism, a concept in political theory, recognizes the potential benefits of conflict and competition in a healthy political system. However, antagonism goes beyond healthy competition and becomes a destructive force.

In essence, political antagonism represents a breakdown in the ability to engage in constructive political discourse and compromise, potentially leading to serious consequences for individuals, societies, and democratic governance.

Expand full comment
Monica Copeland's avatar

Excellent quote. Thank you! I can see that the link provided directs to Archive dot org, though it will not load. I've tried searching the quote directly and cannot return a hit. I wonder if its been deleted?

edited: I tried a third time and it worked. Thanks so much for sharing this!

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

Courts have been captured. Yesterday the Supreme Court said that it’s legal for corporations to pick the judge that oversees their cases.

That and citizens united allowed the government to be brought.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Heather Oxtot. VERY good questions. My guess is the jury was hand picked by well financed jurisdiction. The concept of a "jury of one's peers" is quaint, yet: >>> A jury of one’s peers refers to a defendant’s constitutional right to have a trial by a jury made of fellow citizens. The jurors should be a random selection of citizens who are a representation of the community where the case is being tried. This right applies to all criminal cases, *but not necessarily all civil cases.* [Asterisks mine]

This case was clearly not prosecuted as a criminal act. Therein lies the rub. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Jury_of_one's_peers

Expand full comment
Heather Oxtot's avatar

Thanks you guys. How long can we languish in this muck? There is no “fixing” or repairing or even replacing these systems because there’s no common memory or understanding of what is right. The long cycle of renewal like a polar reversal would be a serious do-over- so long as their bunkers don’t hold.

Expand full comment
Cinoates's avatar

Thank you so much for this post and also the update on the Schara Family. The daffodils and the blue vase are absolutely gorgeous! 💐💐💐

Expand full comment
Tish Fedora's avatar

I am sickened to the core regarding the Grace Schara case ruling. The outcome of the Schara case dovetails with the lack of acknowledgement that the last 5 years of chaos was a military operation. The operation continues, the military is in full charge.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

First, thank you for all you are trying to do for us. I must say though, given all the information that you have shared, they are not going to stop. That is obvious. If anything they are going to step things up. They being the "people", and I use that term loosely, that run earth. They have no empathy, so they are not people in the true sense. The agenda is to make people sick, take all their money, and have them die before they can collect retirement, as they have stolen all of the retirement funds. Like you said, it's not a health issue. It's a death issue. I don't see any way to stop them. The courts are not going to judge in our favor and the politicians are useless, less than useless actually. I would love to come back in a hundred years or so for a very short visit and see how things went. I am 67 now and have a big target on my back, so I won't see this play all the way out. Best of luck to you!

Expand full comment
Wayne Teachman's avatar

It is an act of war against the people by corporate heads and money changers and traitors at the highest levels plain and simple

Expand full comment
Steve Nieman's avatar

It's a two-way street. All the higher spiritual virtues of wisdom, insight, love, inspiration and intuition are offered by the gods from the higher angelic hierarchies. But only if humans accept the offer by acknowledging our higher thoughts, feelings and deeds originate from this invisible divine realm and we are subordinate to it.

Expand full comment
agnt RogerW, on Holy Night's avatar

I like the presentations of Palmer's group.

Very professional.

Before watching your video, I have to say that to me covid as a permanent military op (not unlike "Islamist terrorism" from 1998-til4ever) is the one explanation that explains the most, so far. And I think it's also the most censored hypothesis. The plain no-virus explanation is censored, but not as much, and it doesn't explain as much as the military op hypothesis, because plain no-virus hypothesis explicitly avoids some issues.

Still, I choose to not be angry to people who believe there was a real pathogenic virus, but are against totalitarianism. The no-virus thing is less important, in my opinion, than the problem of totalitarianism.

Plus, I like a diversity of views and tactics and strategies. I don't like the monomania of "when most people understand there was no virus, they will oppose the tyrants." I think that's impossible. But from a variety of opinions and tactics, there may be a crack on the dam of censorship one day, and then who knows, maybe peace breaks out.

Expand full comment
Truth Guardians's avatar

Brett Hawes latest podcast gets into just how deep this war actually goes with some serious insider Intel. Remember that in a wartime situation military law supersedes civil law and the proper mechanism of law to use for remedy/reparations/compensation/an immediate cessation to all hostile activities Against Humanity is the Law of War Manual treaty process. Many have NO IDEA how much we've been protected and continue to be assisted. There are so so many layers and factors to this war that many don't even know about and everything has to be rolled out slowly to give regular people the opportunity to do THEIR PART, because the reality is that according to Rome statute article 25, the Law of War Manual section 15.6, and the international covenants and treaties, if you aren't doing your part you become a complicit participant and equally liable for the harm (especially if you pay taxes during these genocidal operations).

https://onwardpod.substack.com/p/sovereignty-military-law-and-cosmic?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1n44j7

Expand full comment