58 Comments
User's avatar
John Lewis's avatar

Hi Sasha, you might want to check out Jamie's interview with Journalist Eric F Coppolino. It seems Jamie and his experiments aren't legit. https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/wheres-your-data-planet-waves-fm

Paul F.'s avatar

Could not hear it the video for the first minute.

Nnikk's avatar

OMFG!! Sorry for the illiterate reply.

But, "Who'dah thunk it?" Well, many of us had a strong lingering "bad feeling", i.e., suspicion of something like being the case. But now, here are the receipts.

follow the silenced's avatar

The reference standard of pcr comes from a fiction. That's what it is. No real object to measure against the "results".

It's like comparing bones found in the woods with bones in a computer model in order to distinguish if they are from unicorns.

Edmond Pare's avatar

Thank you, Sasha. I applaud your interest in following Jamie Andrews' project and informing us via this substack.

I'm only half way through your discussion with Andrews and have to read all of these comments; but, now you've given me solid reference ammunition to oppose the governor of my state (Maine) who, along with the state's CDC, has been equating "positive" PCR tests with Covid-19 "cases" and using those fraudulently derived high "case" numbers to justify her executive orders which have been devastating the state's economy and causing injury to some of the healthcare workers who have been mandated to receive Covid-19 jabs, or quit their jobs.

Karla M LaZier's avatar

Remember the AIDS virus has never been isolated and look what that wrought on the world via Fauci - just practice for Covid 19 theater that continues. A world gone mad over and over for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and eliminating the other.

Karla M LaZier's avatar

Smoke and mirrors- the billion dollar plus debacle brought to us by “scientists” crooks in lab coats. Love the debunk of DNA testing - scams perpetrated by scambos.

Who do you trust - no one, no how, never. Thanks Jamie for your dedication to the truth and bringing no bias to your endeavors and Sasha for shining the light on this amazing hoax and dedicated humans with a soul to reveal it. Open publishing so no one can tweak the results to fit their nefarious goals - no conflict of interest, no payoffs, no imprimatur’s from supposedly respected scientists in on the original hoax.

teekk's avatar

I'm searching everywhere but can't find a definitive answer- Can anyone tell me if the current 2024 flu vaccine is mRNA vaccine.

Not the covid flu combo vaccine, but just regular flu vax ?

I'd choose not to get it al all, but healthcare employment requires it.

Unbelievably, they are " threatening " reinstatement of the c- vax as well.

I'm trying to discover if that's even legal.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

flu vax, whether mRNA or not, is just as dangerous. Please read Peggy Hall (The Healthy American) for the relevant law, and for help filing proper exemption papers. The employer can't force any vax on you, mRNA or not.

teekk's avatar

True that it should not be that way- there should not be force to take any vacation under threat of loosing your job or not be hired in the first place ( which is the case in my area), but yet, they find it too hard to let go of that controle.

simpatico jones's avatar

Hi Sasha, I don't quite understand where DNA analysis is accurate and where it is being used to deceive. Would you have any sources to guide me? Maybe you could do an article on it?

Sasha Latypova's avatar

DNA analysis is not accurate. DNA is a mathematical model, it is not "real" because nobody has ever found or measured it directly. It is only postulated in mathematical sense, based on experiments that are just as ridiculous and unscientific as the virology ones. Here is a good critical review: https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

Most DNA "science" is just large statistical datasets with too many variables. Once you have more than 7 variables, anything can be associated with anything.

Rob S.'s avatar

Kevin Bacon proved that a couple of decades ago, didn't he.

;-)

nixnixnix's avatar

Big love Sasha great insight to your life and work x x

Research Integrity's avatar

I like the explanation for pcr and sequencing. They insert the colors, and then say that they have successfully detected the colors. :))

Somewhere's avatar

Plausible deniability

Plausible deniability is the ability of people, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of or responsibility for actions committed by or on behalf of members of their organizational hierarchy. They may do so because of a lack of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions

This is the act of Global Criminal Syndicate of perpetrator and worse it is and was an intent pre-planned and pre-arranged a long time ago. All these entities do mock, scapegoat, vilify and ostracise who ever comes in their way (A21/30 SDG 17) a mantra concocted onto it self becoming a being "To Big to Fail", thanks for keep going, chipping off, at the knee of this Beast

Thumbnail Green's avatar

Key takeaway- the perfect health of a kidney cell line is in a growing medium NOT consisting of Kale juice.

I eat my veggies but wow the arguments for meat in your diet kind of never stop. Thanks Sasha. Also having been suss on Oligarch controlled living conditions for the masses I love Jamie is joining us off-grid hippies 👏🏻

JLK's avatar

This was all very interesting and educational. However - I totally disagree with the implied conclusion. That being - if all of this was true and done properly then it would have been ok to mandate testing and vaccines. I DO NOT care if the testing is accurate or BOGUS. WE have a RIGHT to say NO to ANY of it!!!!

Jamie Andrews's avatar

Let me be very clear... everything should be a choice... I believe that if these things worked, even if there was some transmissible pathogen with a 100% kill rate there STILL should be NO mandates or rules as to the risks that should be our own responsibility.

JLK's avatar

Thank you for that clarification. I am just very touchy lately with all the talk about 'making vaccines safer.' I have come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as a safe vaccine.

Jamie Andrews's avatar

Certainly not.. there is nothing to vaccinate for... I wouldn't inject anything, even saline as it is unnatural... ditch all pharmaceutical products altogether.