We talked about a wide range of topics, including Pandemic Preparedness racket, how vaccines cause food allergies and drive the chronic disease epidemic, the nature of time, and much more.
Really enjoyed this interview, however James D doesn’t follow up your initial comment about homeopathy, a seemingly favoured ‘alternative’ of old man Rockefeller and the British Royal family. Have you written about the topic elsewhere or mentioned it?
As soon as Sasha Latypova mentioned northern Italy and the beginning scare about a rapidly-spreading deadly virus as so many old folks perished in the retirement homes there, I remembered a fairly well-known, well here in France, genitician and ex-director of France's INRS, Alexandre Henrion-Caude, who connected the previous flu-shot campaigns for the old people in northern Italy and this worrying viral outbreak that put many of them to sleep forever.
This lady was of course hounded by the usual media attack-dogs as she DARED to publicly criticize the INSANE french governments' destructive confinements and medical protocols:((
Mostly a constructive conversation, Sasha, so thanks, as usual. But I've got to weigh in on a reflexive bad habit of James Delingpole's that severely hurts his credibility as an intellect, a seeker and participant in the search for a better, more humane world.
When Delingpole gets into satan-casting and family-lineage name-calling and the like, as he does around minute 42, he proves himself a lumpy-minded witch-hunter and no more responsible a conspiracy theorist than the notorious bigot Miles Mathis, who is perhaps the least disciplined genealogist, and most eager (legitimately described) anti-semite on the internet. Both of them struggle to differentiate between the general and the specific, the group and the individual. It's all guilt by association, kill-the-messenger, ad hominem hour with these guys, and their credibilities both drown in their own self-generated puddle of smug - except to the suggestible, easily misled dupes they seek to influence and cultivate in their audiences.
I saw Delingpole even do this to his own friend Alexander Waugh, at the conclusion of their talk, in an attempt to impugn Waugh's heritage with sloppy innuendo and gotcha tactics, and it was utterly disturbing - a revelation of James' true colors, indeed, ie. not a friend to Waugh at all. A know-it-all jerk, plain and simple.
Delingpole's taxonomy of religious cosmology is totally lame, as well, when he fails to recognize that every "satanist" operates within a subset of Abrahamic, mostly Christian cosmology. Satan is a Christian god, mind you one that is the personification of a SUBSET of the human INTERIORITY, the shadow of each of us - not something found outside of the human spirit, any more than Yahweh, the Holy Ghost, or Christ is outside of human consciousness or, more specifically, outside of Abrahamic Consciousness - yet he likes to pretend Satan is Other and the pure opposition to Christian faith, Christian belief, Christian Society, Christian redemption, Christian tribalism. He's clearly never been offended by Christian hypocrisy or happened to notice the systemic pedophilia problem that seems to concentrate among Christian spiritual leaders. This is pure mirror-blind ignorance, a-historical wishful thinking, and evidence of his simple-mindedness and profound incuriosity about the deep underlying nature of things. He might as well be re-enacting the McCarthyite House Un-American Activities Committee to flush out the pinko commies in our midst, but dressed up to cancel heretical believers (of whatever self-righteous Christian superstition he happens to endorse), instead. It's extremely frustrating to good faith discussion, and suggestive of the fact that he's doing the divisive work of the Vatican, Naval Intelligence,* or the Royal Family, whether he knows it or not. "Burn the Witch," sever the correct family lines, and all our problems will evaporate, right, Delingpole?
I'll make a 3 dollar bet that he even maintains an IRA with mutual funds invested in PE's war machines, and doesn't realize he's invested in the manifestation of his own nightmare.
I'd love to have a civil conversation with him about how exactly he prefers to define "God." Is it the vengeful One of the Hebrews, the benevolent One of Christ, the omniscient One, the omnipotent One, the Creator god, the Gnostic God, the Anglican God, the Catholic God, or his own personal Jesus? Which? He doesn't make any distinctions and leaves the listener to project willy nilly upon the roughly meaningless Name. It certainly isn't the personification of the Totality, or of Nature, that he means by 'God' as it doesn't include the Shadow of the human psyche for him. How can he make a blanket assertion like 'I hate models,' and yet not see that his conception of a personified divinity is itself merely a model, a representation of the unnameable Thing itself, but to expose himself a fool?
It's totally not helpful to the Conspiracy-probing dialog to concern ourselves with the spiritually impure, to chalk up our problems exclusively to matters of mythological commitments, and to assume that our primary problem, sin qua non, is Familial Cults of Power what with intentions we can only guess at, those people which are incapable of even being defined with any certainty and, yet still their family trees felled.
The reality is that the globalists are criminals and enemies of the Constitution and Natural Law, Fraudulent Syndicalists posing as Public Servants, and on those merits ALONE they should be tried and defeated, their powers and privileges permanently removed. Their spiritual commitments are effectively arbitrary and not good predictors of what good or evil they are capable of. And many of their agents and lieutenants are freelance professionals and bureaucrats without the luxury of family endorsement or support. Many of them are themselves Church-going people who see no conflict in compartmentalizing their professional lives and private lives, and many not logically incorrectly see the centralization of a global government as an analogue for and manifestation of Christ's Universal power itself.
While the seeds of technocractic globalism do seem to get a footing in the philosophies around Material Reductionism - which fundamentally denies the presence of spirit or soul - there is no logic but bone-headed syllogism which requires any and all materialism to end inevitably with dystopian totalitarian tyranny and cruel acts performed automatically and unjustly against the guiltless and un-consenting. Religious certainty, or fundamentalism of any stripe, is equally as capable of landing us within a morass of colorless evil ends, easily as much as the UN/WHO/CDC can do it, and history is full of such examples. Christians are notoriously predictable victimizers in this regard. The greatest irony is that Satanists share something with Delingpole that the Mainstream Globalists do not: they both believe in spirit and the soul, ...even if the former do happen to prioritize the body and its selfish habits over the higher (and just as easily corruptible) spiritual Self. A warning to consider: if Delingpole EVER incorrectly fingers a public figure as diabolical who is in fact not, well then he's cheerfully doing the Devil's work quite effectively, and he continues cheerfully along none-the-wiser. Doopie doo. I propose that his jerk move to discredit Evelyn Waugh is a perfect example of this.
The dude is so eager and giddy to cast blame and seek THE historical or ever-persistent scapegoat that it's quite clear, to me anyway, that his cult of personality - not unlike Jordan Peterson - is really the thing that drives him, and not a desire for justice, truth, or preservation of principle, let alone anything good or divine. He's so proud of his special knowledge. Please reform yourself, Delingpole, and quit seeking the sensational, simple attributions of EVIL (BOO!) lurking beneath every rock. Your credibility and utility to benevolent intention will increase if you seek some intellectual humility, accommodate some version of forgiveness and redemption in your process, and bother to think a little more deeply, rather than hiding behind your un-probed religious and class bigotries.
*If we want to begin some constructive, individually targeted witch hunting, let's talk about Delingpole's previous role as editor of British Breitbart News. Steve Bannon - his American counterpart at Breitbart - is quite obviously a controlled opposition instrument of Naval Intelligence and Oil Interests, having created the Charlottesville Alt-Right Boogie Man out of whole cloth to stymie outsider Trump in his first term and frighten the leftist normies to maximal effect. So why shouldn't Delingpole also be conjecturally considered of the same class of mis-direction/detractor plants? He also worked for the Daily Mail, which, back in the day, propagandized to foment the Boer War, concentration camps and all, for the benefit of the Rhodes cabal. Shouldn't that make Delingpole inherently suspect? I offer these ad hominem, guilt by association syllogisms in jest to make the point.
Note to Delingpole and his ilk: Your tactics fly both directions, dude, so watch out for the boomerangs you cast. Until you adopt logical underpinnings, a rational even keel that allows for uncertainty and forgiveness, your journalism amounts to little more than hearsay. Until you cultivate a non-Abrahamic view of things, Satan is yours, man. Live with it; running from yourself will only bring you down to his level. That's how the Roman Imperialists designed your religion to function.
Thanks for the platform, Sasha. Keep up the good work.
Ha! I needed that. Thanks. Sometimes a hug and a good night's sleep is all it takes.
So, I take it you are certain that James will NOT be reading your comments board...? I'll have to send him my missive by snail mail, I suppose, but for some reservation... mightn't that just seem just a little too cringe, a bit too stalkerly, a bit too far over the line of civility?
I can see how my rant may seem an odd and obsessive distraction entirely lacking in both reason or proportion, but for one centrally important bit of information, until now hidden, secret, occluded, occulted, if you will:
My sir name, you see, by virtue of karmic fate, and nothing to do with my volition, just happens to be ...Collins.
[No relation to Francis, Phil, Joan, the Rhode Island Collins', the Lynn, Massachusetts Collins', Astronaut Michael Collins, Irish Revolutionary Michael Collins, nor the Collins Dictionary people, nor even the Collins' who "owned Washington DC," or any other such malarkey. In fact, I'm sure this will come to James as divine revelation, though I'm sure common sense to you: there are many unrelated family trees who bear this name, Collins, most of them totally ignorant and obedient Protestants and/or consumer agnostics.]
Mind you, Delingpole doesn't say "A Collins Family Line/Branch;" he says "THE Collins Family." This is why, baring a public apology and clarification, I'll continue to chalk up his cognitive integrity to the same caliber of scholarship as Miles Mathis wherever there is room for appropriate graffiti/vandalism on the internet.
It's emotionally somewhat akin, perhaps, to hearing 'news' from one of your favorite blogs that {THE Latypova's are a family of Soviet Central Banker Eugenicists, and so "one can well imagine" that Sasha "seems" "essentially Satanic," who knows? Have you seen her eyes?! She may even be controlled opposition, only one onion layer removed from Robert Malone, and in the habit of child-rape and child sacrifice, too, I'll bet.} You see, it's all in a book by a guy whose pseudonym may be translated 'Peaceful-Ruler Physician for the Branch-of-Lucifer' ("Fritz Artz Springmeier"), but whose given name, Victor Schoof means "winning sheaf (of paper)," and whose actual father was employed by USAID, that old shell of CIA, with whom he undertook multiple "adventurous work assignments" in Pakistan, among other exotic locales, under the guise of agricultural engineer from Kansas. Oy ve. Somehow, Delingpole's formative time spent at Christ Church Oxford apparently failed to instill any rigor to his casual finger pointing pursuits.
Are such off-hand, and clearly unintended, assaults best ignored? Perhaps.
BUT, now that the black cat is out of the bag, if James continues to drag my good name through the Illuminati mud by trumpeting to his audiences, (and, more importantly, YOUR congregation), that me and my kin belong to one of the 13 Satanic Blood Lines - and thereby he effects to preemptively discredit and libel any academic work which I intend to offer in good faith to red-pilled audiences - THEN... I'll be left no choice but to turn him into a frog.
And then I'll toss the Frog Version of Delingpole into the same cauldron in which me and my coven of unaffiliated poet jesters will boil alive the WEF-devil-propagandist Yuval Noah Harrari and the tiresome Dr. Robert Sapolsky, which shall be undertaken as a sacred demonstration to all Three Worlds that, in fact, FREE WILL actually does exist. And, just so there's no ambiguity about which side of the fence I stand on, if Francis Collins of the NIH is available for the cannibalistic siore, you can be certain he'll be thrown in and slowly boiled alive with relish (and blood-sucking snails) for good measure to restore the cosmic balance.
Za druzi, za druzba, za shchastya, na zdorovya, Budmo,
M. G. Collins
PS. You're correct - most late 20th/21st c. poetry is lame and designed to be forgotten.
"it's emotionally somewhat akin, perhaps, to hearing 'news' from one of your favorite blogs that {THE Latypova's are a family of Soviet Central Banker Eugenicists, and so "one can well imagine" that Sasha "seems" "essentially Satanic," who knows? "
I hear this all the time! Do you know there are several clubs of "freedom fighters" dedicated to smearing me with this kind of shit and worse. Including the great health freedom leader himself, the esteemed mRNA inventor Dr. Malone announced to his millions of followers that my husband is a member of WEF. Which is a lie, but hey, the great truth leader and all. He is not alone, however, I have some ardent truthseekers writing blog posts about my family, my children, my colleagues from decades ago, making podcasts about my connections to the deep state, the deeper state, the Russian deep state, lmao. This is internet.
We discussed Francis Collins in this interview and his point was about that specific Collins family.
For real. I hear you. All agreed and well understood. You have a wonderful sense of humor, which I admire, about these types of persecution and (intentional and accidental) campaigns of abuse. You also don't fail to set the record straight with charming aplomb in measured responses. To let them stand, it seems to me, would be to accept and enable their claims, even if they can be such a time suck. Your perseverance and self-regard in such acknowledgement is the role model worth emulating.
Sadly, James was making a huge inference, given that he plainly didn't even know (!!!) who the villain Francis Collins is in relation to the Scamdemic and US policy, and so he was fanatically conjecturing a con-fusion of two yet unresolved Family lines, all in the service of raising his favorite devil to scapegoat. Francis Collins needn't be illuminati-spawn for us to understand him correctly as a modern Adolf Eichmann. To do so is a distraction and a discredit to real accounting. And so when James virtue signals with "Look! A SATAN!" I'm afraid he's doing the Christian version of: "Look, Reptilian Lizard Alien Elitist Pedophiles from Flat-Earthistan installing Nanotech to turn your children into Mind-Controlled Zombie Slaves! They're everywhere and they've been planning it since 1776!" It allows him to effectively protect the Intelligence & Military Apparatus by appealing to such absurdities. It's desperate podcasting on his part, I feel, and so worthy of acknowledgement, if not censure.
This was the best interview! I lol so many times! You're so funny and matter of fact! Your explanations are so rooted in basic common sense.
This is where the rubber meets the road! Common sense is no longer relied upon. It's easier to believe what everyone else believes. Whether it makes absolutely zero sense or not!
I call my son out on this when it's something that's just so absurd!
I lay out all the facts so he can see that if something doesn't make sense or add up. Ask questions!
My grandson is 8 months old and I will never give up trying to get through to my son & daughter in law. The baby has already been to ER for an allergic reaction. It's the worst thing that I've ever experienced. To stand by & watch knowing what this is doing to this beautiful baby. My son won't take the time to read or look into what I'm trying to get through to him.
I never imagined my son wouldn't believe me about something so serious.
It's affected our relationship, sadly.
He's not very nice to me, and I've had about enough of it!
I tend to spill my guts regarding this topic. It breaks my heart!
You praised Rupert Sheldrake’s book The Science Delusion. It defines "the science delusion is the belief that science already understands the nature of reality”. But who actually believes this? I certainly don’t, nor would any true scientist. The premise of the book is based on a fallacy, so I won’t bother reading it in detail.
Sheldrake appeared frustrated when his concept of "morphic resonance" was widely dismissed by the scientific community. In response, attacked “science” itself which must be wrong. To challenge science, he constructed a strawman argument, attacking misconceptions about science.
In my view, all ideas or theories, except tautologies, are eventually proven wrong. A much deeper discussion of science would be necessary to fully support this point, but that’s beyond the scope of this comment. Scientific theories are often useful, though they are not permanent truths—as Sheldrake wrongly asserts. For instance, the laws of physics are valuable tools, even though they may one day be revised or replaced.
Scientific ideas must be falsifiable in order to be proven wrong, as Karl Popper pointed out. Ideas like morphic resonance are not scientific because they lack the critical tests needed to disprove them. That said, not all unscientific ideas are useless. For example, belief in God is meaningful to many, even though it is a metaphysical rather than a scientific idea (see Ludwig Wittgenstein).
Medicine, however, is not true science, because it often avoids testing or disproving theories and policies by ignoring inconvenient evidence—a tendency we saw in abundance during COVID. But these failures of medicine should not be conflated with failures of science itself.
Monsters
Down syndrome is a normal and natural ""defect"from older mothers. In other words, God made these babies NOT vaccines.
Really enjoyed this interview, however James D doesn’t follow up your initial comment about homeopathy, a seemingly favoured ‘alternative’ of old man Rockefeller and the British Royal family. Have you written about the topic elsewhere or mentioned it?
Lol! I listen to everything with a critical eye and for that reason I don’t actually support anyone!
The only way anything escaped is
Whatever poison is being injected into people
We do need to read and question everything because we are told to watch out, pay attention, be careful.
If you Go back to the Word of God in Rom 12:19
Do not avenge yourselves, beloved, but leave room for God’s wrath. For it is written: “Vengeance is Mine; I will repay, says the Lord.”
Actually according to God’s Word we are
To forgive 70x7 Matthew 18:21-22,
Lol! The term of Virus is from Latin and means poison!
excellent discussion......thank you👌
As soon as Sasha Latypova mentioned northern Italy and the beginning scare about a rapidly-spreading deadly virus as so many old folks perished in the retirement homes there, I remembered a fairly well-known, well here in France, genitician and ex-director of France's INRS, Alexandre Henrion-Caude, who connected the previous flu-shot campaigns for the old people in northern Italy and this worrying viral outbreak that put many of them to sleep forever.
This lady was of course hounded by the usual media attack-dogs as she DARED to publicly criticize the INSANE french governments' destructive confinements and medical protocols:((
Mostly a constructive conversation, Sasha, so thanks, as usual. But I've got to weigh in on a reflexive bad habit of James Delingpole's that severely hurts his credibility as an intellect, a seeker and participant in the search for a better, more humane world.
When Delingpole gets into satan-casting and family-lineage name-calling and the like, as he does around minute 42, he proves himself a lumpy-minded witch-hunter and no more responsible a conspiracy theorist than the notorious bigot Miles Mathis, who is perhaps the least disciplined genealogist, and most eager (legitimately described) anti-semite on the internet. Both of them struggle to differentiate between the general and the specific, the group and the individual. It's all guilt by association, kill-the-messenger, ad hominem hour with these guys, and their credibilities both drown in their own self-generated puddle of smug - except to the suggestible, easily misled dupes they seek to influence and cultivate in their audiences.
I saw Delingpole even do this to his own friend Alexander Waugh, at the conclusion of their talk, in an attempt to impugn Waugh's heritage with sloppy innuendo and gotcha tactics, and it was utterly disturbing - a revelation of James' true colors, indeed, ie. not a friend to Waugh at all. A know-it-all jerk, plain and simple.
Delingpole's taxonomy of religious cosmology is totally lame, as well, when he fails to recognize that every "satanist" operates within a subset of Abrahamic, mostly Christian cosmology. Satan is a Christian god, mind you one that is the personification of a SUBSET of the human INTERIORITY, the shadow of each of us - not something found outside of the human spirit, any more than Yahweh, the Holy Ghost, or Christ is outside of human consciousness or, more specifically, outside of Abrahamic Consciousness - yet he likes to pretend Satan is Other and the pure opposition to Christian faith, Christian belief, Christian Society, Christian redemption, Christian tribalism. He's clearly never been offended by Christian hypocrisy or happened to notice the systemic pedophilia problem that seems to concentrate among Christian spiritual leaders. This is pure mirror-blind ignorance, a-historical wishful thinking, and evidence of his simple-mindedness and profound incuriosity about the deep underlying nature of things. He might as well be re-enacting the McCarthyite House Un-American Activities Committee to flush out the pinko commies in our midst, but dressed up to cancel heretical believers (of whatever self-righteous Christian superstition he happens to endorse), instead. It's extremely frustrating to good faith discussion, and suggestive of the fact that he's doing the divisive work of the Vatican, Naval Intelligence,* or the Royal Family, whether he knows it or not. "Burn the Witch," sever the correct family lines, and all our problems will evaporate, right, Delingpole?
I'll make a 3 dollar bet that he even maintains an IRA with mutual funds invested in PE's war machines, and doesn't realize he's invested in the manifestation of his own nightmare.
I'd love to have a civil conversation with him about how exactly he prefers to define "God." Is it the vengeful One of the Hebrews, the benevolent One of Christ, the omniscient One, the omnipotent One, the Creator god, the Gnostic God, the Anglican God, the Catholic God, or his own personal Jesus? Which? He doesn't make any distinctions and leaves the listener to project willy nilly upon the roughly meaningless Name. It certainly isn't the personification of the Totality, or of Nature, that he means by 'God' as it doesn't include the Shadow of the human psyche for him. How can he make a blanket assertion like 'I hate models,' and yet not see that his conception of a personified divinity is itself merely a model, a representation of the unnameable Thing itself, but to expose himself a fool?
It's totally not helpful to the Conspiracy-probing dialog to concern ourselves with the spiritually impure, to chalk up our problems exclusively to matters of mythological commitments, and to assume that our primary problem, sin qua non, is Familial Cults of Power what with intentions we can only guess at, those people which are incapable of even being defined with any certainty and, yet still their family trees felled.
The reality is that the globalists are criminals and enemies of the Constitution and Natural Law, Fraudulent Syndicalists posing as Public Servants, and on those merits ALONE they should be tried and defeated, their powers and privileges permanently removed. Their spiritual commitments are effectively arbitrary and not good predictors of what good or evil they are capable of. And many of their agents and lieutenants are freelance professionals and bureaucrats without the luxury of family endorsement or support. Many of them are themselves Church-going people who see no conflict in compartmentalizing their professional lives and private lives, and many not logically incorrectly see the centralization of a global government as an analogue for and manifestation of Christ's Universal power itself.
While the seeds of technocractic globalism do seem to get a footing in the philosophies around Material Reductionism - which fundamentally denies the presence of spirit or soul - there is no logic but bone-headed syllogism which requires any and all materialism to end inevitably with dystopian totalitarian tyranny and cruel acts performed automatically and unjustly against the guiltless and un-consenting. Religious certainty, or fundamentalism of any stripe, is equally as capable of landing us within a morass of colorless evil ends, easily as much as the UN/WHO/CDC can do it, and history is full of such examples. Christians are notoriously predictable victimizers in this regard. The greatest irony is that Satanists share something with Delingpole that the Mainstream Globalists do not: they both believe in spirit and the soul, ...even if the former do happen to prioritize the body and its selfish habits over the higher (and just as easily corruptible) spiritual Self. A warning to consider: if Delingpole EVER incorrectly fingers a public figure as diabolical who is in fact not, well then he's cheerfully doing the Devil's work quite effectively, and he continues cheerfully along none-the-wiser. Doopie doo. I propose that his jerk move to discredit Evelyn Waugh is a perfect example of this.
The dude is so eager and giddy to cast blame and seek THE historical or ever-persistent scapegoat that it's quite clear, to me anyway, that his cult of personality - not unlike Jordan Peterson - is really the thing that drives him, and not a desire for justice, truth, or preservation of principle, let alone anything good or divine. He's so proud of his special knowledge. Please reform yourself, Delingpole, and quit seeking the sensational, simple attributions of EVIL (BOO!) lurking beneath every rock. Your credibility and utility to benevolent intention will increase if you seek some intellectual humility, accommodate some version of forgiveness and redemption in your process, and bother to think a little more deeply, rather than hiding behind your un-probed religious and class bigotries.
*If we want to begin some constructive, individually targeted witch hunting, let's talk about Delingpole's previous role as editor of British Breitbart News. Steve Bannon - his American counterpart at Breitbart - is quite obviously a controlled opposition instrument of Naval Intelligence and Oil Interests, having created the Charlottesville Alt-Right Boogie Man out of whole cloth to stymie outsider Trump in his first term and frighten the leftist normies to maximal effect. So why shouldn't Delingpole also be conjecturally considered of the same class of mis-direction/detractor plants? He also worked for the Daily Mail, which, back in the day, propagandized to foment the Boer War, concentration camps and all, for the benefit of the Rhodes cabal. Shouldn't that make Delingpole inherently suspect? I offer these ad hominem, guilt by association syllogisms in jest to make the point.
Note to Delingpole and his ilk: Your tactics fly both directions, dude, so watch out for the boomerangs you cast. Until you adopt logical underpinnings, a rational even keel that allows for uncertainty and forgiveness, your journalism amounts to little more than hearsay. Until you cultivate a non-Abrahamic view of things, Satan is yours, man. Live with it; running from yourself will only bring you down to his level. That's how the Roman Imperialists designed your religion to function.
Thanks for the platform, Sasha. Keep up the good work.
Dead Horse beaten. -WWimSA
Um... you seem like you need a hug? I am not Delingpole and this rant here is totally missing the point of our conversation. Do get some rest.
Ha! I needed that. Thanks. Sometimes a hug and a good night's sleep is all it takes.
So, I take it you are certain that James will NOT be reading your comments board...? I'll have to send him my missive by snail mail, I suppose, but for some reservation... mightn't that just seem just a little too cringe, a bit too stalkerly, a bit too far over the line of civility?
I can see how my rant may seem an odd and obsessive distraction entirely lacking in both reason or proportion, but for one centrally important bit of information, until now hidden, secret, occluded, occulted, if you will:
My sir name, you see, by virtue of karmic fate, and nothing to do with my volition, just happens to be ...Collins.
[No relation to Francis, Phil, Joan, the Rhode Island Collins', the Lynn, Massachusetts Collins', Astronaut Michael Collins, Irish Revolutionary Michael Collins, nor the Collins Dictionary people, nor even the Collins' who "owned Washington DC," or any other such malarkey. In fact, I'm sure this will come to James as divine revelation, though I'm sure common sense to you: there are many unrelated family trees who bear this name, Collins, most of them totally ignorant and obedient Protestants and/or consumer agnostics.]
Mind you, Delingpole doesn't say "A Collins Family Line/Branch;" he says "THE Collins Family." This is why, baring a public apology and clarification, I'll continue to chalk up his cognitive integrity to the same caliber of scholarship as Miles Mathis wherever there is room for appropriate graffiti/vandalism on the internet.
It's emotionally somewhat akin, perhaps, to hearing 'news' from one of your favorite blogs that {THE Latypova's are a family of Soviet Central Banker Eugenicists, and so "one can well imagine" that Sasha "seems" "essentially Satanic," who knows? Have you seen her eyes?! She may even be controlled opposition, only one onion layer removed from Robert Malone, and in the habit of child-rape and child sacrifice, too, I'll bet.} You see, it's all in a book by a guy whose pseudonym may be translated 'Peaceful-Ruler Physician for the Branch-of-Lucifer' ("Fritz Artz Springmeier"), but whose given name, Victor Schoof means "winning sheaf (of paper)," and whose actual father was employed by USAID, that old shell of CIA, with whom he undertook multiple "adventurous work assignments" in Pakistan, among other exotic locales, under the guise of agricultural engineer from Kansas. Oy ve. Somehow, Delingpole's formative time spent at Christ Church Oxford apparently failed to instill any rigor to his casual finger pointing pursuits.
Are such off-hand, and clearly unintended, assaults best ignored? Perhaps.
BUT, now that the black cat is out of the bag, if James continues to drag my good name through the Illuminati mud by trumpeting to his audiences, (and, more importantly, YOUR congregation), that me and my kin belong to one of the 13 Satanic Blood Lines - and thereby he effects to preemptively discredit and libel any academic work which I intend to offer in good faith to red-pilled audiences - THEN... I'll be left no choice but to turn him into a frog.
And then I'll toss the Frog Version of Delingpole into the same cauldron in which me and my coven of unaffiliated poet jesters will boil alive the WEF-devil-propagandist Yuval Noah Harrari and the tiresome Dr. Robert Sapolsky, which shall be undertaken as a sacred demonstration to all Three Worlds that, in fact, FREE WILL actually does exist. And, just so there's no ambiguity about which side of the fence I stand on, if Francis Collins of the NIH is available for the cannibalistic siore, you can be certain he'll be thrown in and slowly boiled alive with relish (and blood-sucking snails) for good measure to restore the cosmic balance.
Za druzi, za druzba, za shchastya, na zdorovya, Budmo,
M. G. Collins
PS. You're correct - most late 20th/21st c. poetry is lame and designed to be forgotten.
"it's emotionally somewhat akin, perhaps, to hearing 'news' from one of your favorite blogs that {THE Latypova's are a family of Soviet Central Banker Eugenicists, and so "one can well imagine" that Sasha "seems" "essentially Satanic," who knows? "
I hear this all the time! Do you know there are several clubs of "freedom fighters" dedicated to smearing me with this kind of shit and worse. Including the great health freedom leader himself, the esteemed mRNA inventor Dr. Malone announced to his millions of followers that my husband is a member of WEF. Which is a lie, but hey, the great truth leader and all. He is not alone, however, I have some ardent truthseekers writing blog posts about my family, my children, my colleagues from decades ago, making podcasts about my connections to the deep state, the deeper state, the Russian deep state, lmao. This is internet.
We discussed Francis Collins in this interview and his point was about that specific Collins family.
For real. I hear you. All agreed and well understood. You have a wonderful sense of humor, which I admire, about these types of persecution and (intentional and accidental) campaigns of abuse. You also don't fail to set the record straight with charming aplomb in measured responses. To let them stand, it seems to me, would be to accept and enable their claims, even if they can be such a time suck. Your perseverance and self-regard in such acknowledgement is the role model worth emulating.
Sadly, James was making a huge inference, given that he plainly didn't even know (!!!) who the villain Francis Collins is in relation to the Scamdemic and US policy, and so he was fanatically conjecturing a con-fusion of two yet unresolved Family lines, all in the service of raising his favorite devil to scapegoat. Francis Collins needn't be illuminati-spawn for us to understand him correctly as a modern Adolf Eichmann. To do so is a distraction and a discredit to real accounting. And so when James virtue signals with "Look! A SATAN!" I'm afraid he's doing the Christian version of: "Look, Reptilian Lizard Alien Elitist Pedophiles from Flat-Earthistan installing Nanotech to turn your children into Mind-Controlled Zombie Slaves! They're everywhere and they've been planning it since 1776!" It allows him to effectively protect the Intelligence & Military Apparatus by appealing to such absurdities. It's desperate podcasting on his part, I feel, and so worthy of acknowledgement, if not censure.
I thank you for your reflections and sympathies.
Having lived in China for decades, I can say that Sasha is spot on with her observations regarding allergies, and injection induced illness.
Western medicine isn't all that its cracked up to be.
In fact, its one of the most extensive con jobs in existence.
Sasha,
This was the best interview! I lol so many times! You're so funny and matter of fact! Your explanations are so rooted in basic common sense.
This is where the rubber meets the road! Common sense is no longer relied upon. It's easier to believe what everyone else believes. Whether it makes absolutely zero sense or not!
I call my son out on this when it's something that's just so absurd!
I lay out all the facts so he can see that if something doesn't make sense or add up. Ask questions!
My grandson is 8 months old and I will never give up trying to get through to my son & daughter in law. The baby has already been to ER for an allergic reaction. It's the worst thing that I've ever experienced. To stand by & watch knowing what this is doing to this beautiful baby. My son won't take the time to read or look into what I'm trying to get through to him.
I never imagined my son wouldn't believe me about something so serious.
It's affected our relationship, sadly.
He's not very nice to me, and I've had about enough of it!
I tend to spill my guts regarding this topic. It breaks my heart!
Thank you Sasha for all that you do!
🤗🙏
PS. I live in Las Vegas! It happened just the way you stated!
This world is much more fascinating than we've been led to believe!
An open & curious mind is mandatory!
❤️
Sasha you rejuvenate my waning faith in the Human Race. Thank you. Love.
You praised Rupert Sheldrake’s book The Science Delusion. It defines "the science delusion is the belief that science already understands the nature of reality”. But who actually believes this? I certainly don’t, nor would any true scientist. The premise of the book is based on a fallacy, so I won’t bother reading it in detail.
Sheldrake appeared frustrated when his concept of "morphic resonance" was widely dismissed by the scientific community. In response, attacked “science” itself which must be wrong. To challenge science, he constructed a strawman argument, attacking misconceptions about science.
In my view, all ideas or theories, except tautologies, are eventually proven wrong. A much deeper discussion of science would be necessary to fully support this point, but that’s beyond the scope of this comment. Scientific theories are often useful, though they are not permanent truths—as Sheldrake wrongly asserts. For instance, the laws of physics are valuable tools, even though they may one day be revised or replaced.
Scientific ideas must be falsifiable in order to be proven wrong, as Karl Popper pointed out. Ideas like morphic resonance are not scientific because they lack the critical tests needed to disprove them. That said, not all unscientific ideas are useless. For example, belief in God is meaningful to many, even though it is a metaphysical rather than a scientific idea (see Ludwig Wittgenstein).
Medicine, however, is not true science, because it often avoids testing or disproving theories and policies by ignoring inconvenient evidence—a tendency we saw in abundance during COVID. But these failures of medicine should not be conflated with failures of science itself.
you are very confused