Addressing hysteria around "self-amplifying" sa-RNA injections.
No, it's not going to end humanity like all the "freedom experts" are telling you it will.
I get questions like these almost daily:
World-ending!
Humanity! Gravity! Urgency!!!!
First of all, self-amplifying RNA is not new. Please refer to this 20 min presentation I made 2 years ago discussing self-amplifying RNA from Pfizer:
Self-Amplifying RNA and Other Versions of Pfizer Product: Video on Bitchute
Pfizer claims that they already used saRNA in people in Phase 1 clinical trials, at least in Germany but probably in other countries, too. This is part of their “investigator’s brochure” from 2020, i.e. a document summarizing preclinical and clinical knowledge about the product to date for the clinical investigators who are running the clinical trials for them:
Here is for example The Corbett Report discussing saRNA purely from the available scientific literature, i.e. taking the claims of the manufacturers as if they are 100% true.
I am not necessarily criticizing this article, in fact it does a good job explaining the theory behind these injections and translating technical language into understandable terms. What I do criticize is the implied belief that whatever the science literature claims about mRNA/saRNA is actually an accurate representation of what they contain and how they work - i.e. self-replicate or self-amplify. The experience of the past almost 4 years tells us nothing in the vials is what it’s claimed in the science paper cartoons! The manufacturers demonstrably are unable to manufacture a single mRNA sequence to specification (e.g. coding for Wuhan “variant”), so how are they going to make a self-replicating Wuhan variant?
I discussed the issue with manufacturing mRNA products a long while ago:
Very Bad Manufacturing Practices: Video on Bitchute
To date I have seen no evidence that any manufacturer of these magic potions consistently produces what they claim they produce. The FDA does not regulate vaccines. Turns out they don’t even have a definition of a “vaccine”. The FDA never tests the vials of vaccines for product conformity/compliance with the pharmaceutical law. The Chemistry Manufacturing Controls documentation from Pfizer which was leaked from the European Medicines Agency (I actually read it) does not define any label conformity tests at the vial level! They only proclaim to test the bulk product in the vat, and those tests allow for gigantic variations of RNA and other components. In other words, if anyone actually wanted to test the mRNA products for compliance purposes, there is no FDA-regulated, enforceable way to do it.
One of the “blessings” (so to speak) of covid was the emergence of the people’s pharmaceutical quality control - the numerous random vial tests that were conducted by independent scientists and doctors all over the world. After thousands of vials of mRNA “vaccines” have been randomly picked and tested - not a single one was found conforming to the label of the product. Here is one such report from Germany, 2 years ago.
Dr. Nagase was one of the people who did such testing. His tests found that the vials he happened to pick potentially didn’t even contain RNA or DNA (which is consistent with the realities of how haphazardly these products are made). I reviewed his findings. I am very surprised that he is now one of the scare mongering voices, as he should know better.
What I am trying to get across is that if you can’t make a Toyota Corolla, you can’t make a turbo version of it either. The self-amplifying bullshit is bullshit. I try not to be an amplifier of it, although, admittedly, it is tempting because fear sells and generates clicks.
In conclusion, given the experience with mRNA products to date, I don’t believe saRNA is any more dangerous than regular mRNA, as neither products can be made as described. It goes without saying that none of this junk should be injected! What I would like to see, should saRNA vials become available in Japan or elsewhere, is people’s pharmaceutical quality control reporting on what is actually found in the vials. My bet is that the contents will be not much different from what was found before.
Additional reading:
Art for today: Vineyard road, oil on panel, 11x14 in.
I’m absolutely with Sasha on this important detail.
When I describe the inherent toxicities built into the original injection, I initially AssUmed that the contents at least approximated the description.
On realising this isn’t true, I amended my description to say “based on what we’ve been told is in the product”.
Let’s face it. If they’re lied categorically and millions have died & tens, probably hundreds of millions are injured to some extent, there’s no rebuttal to my statements that this is intentional.
If harms were not intentional they would have used saline or something else that’s harmless.
Merely based on their own description, it’s impossible that, had they actually been able to make it as stated, there are numerous, superfluous, independently & obviously toxic mechanisms in the product. Condemned by their own words.
It’s very interesting that despite apparently containing different materials than claimed, the clinical signs & the available post mortem evidence does match what I’d predicted based on expected mechanisms of toxicity.
I expect if there’s any mRNA or circular DNA, of any appreciable length (I am guessing even 10% of the inferred length to encode the synthetic protein they call “spike”, so long as it wasn’t human, would be ample to trigger autoimmune reactions. Our bodies do not tolerate non-self polypeptides/proteins.
As Sasha & Katherine have recently observed, by going all the back to Charles Rixey’s Nobel prize acceptance speech, we’re fiercely attuned to systemic arrival of foreign proteins. Rixey’s discovery was to characterise the process whereby an animal can acquire immunity aka allergy aka become sensitised to a foreign protein. Crucially, it takes TWO exposures. One to set up an immune readiness & the second to activate the trip wire, whereupon one or more “hypersensitivity reactions” can occur.
The variant he is best known for is Type I - anaphylaxis, a sometimes overwhelming, immediate immune response. This is generally considered to be an IgE isootype triggered, mast cell degranulation mediated response & it can certainly kill you.
Think of those who die after ingesting peanuts or who are stung by a bee. Or who receive an infusion of penicillin, not knowing they’re allergic to it (or rather, to drug / protein adductor that readily form from the parent molecule).
Sasha furthermore pointed out that there’s no way that intact foreign proteins can enter our circulation until the advent of scarification but most importantly, the hypodermic syringes hollow needle.
When we eat, the non-self proteins are degraded by our digestive processes and it’s amino acid that are absorbed. An intact gut wall will not allow to pass anything larger than individual molecules, unless there’s a specific transporter mechanism for something larger.
With this insight, it makes sense NEVER to allow yourself to be injected with a solution containing foreign proteins. If this happens multiple times then, to unpredictable extents, you’re highly likely to experience one or more hypersensitivity reactions.
IIRC correctly, there are five distinct varieties of hypersensitivity reactions. After Type I, Type IV is arguably the best known. This involves killer (cytotoxic) T-cells attacking every cell having the foreign protein on their surfaces, regardless of how this state arose (you could have been injected with foreign protein or by a genetic instruction). This is a slower process, taking days to weeks (or even longer), contrasting with Type I, which takes minutes to hours). Consider this as you would an organ transplant that’s gone wrong, because the donor was too different from the recipient. As your body “rejects the transplant”, you fall sick and may die. Immunosuppressive drugs are likely to be required on an open ended basis.
That’s what the body of a jabbed & boosted person is doing. Essentially, they’re rejecting their own body.
To do these things INTENTIONALLY & on a worldwide scale must surely classify as among the most evil things that humans have ever done to one another. I think you’d need to be possessed to do this & not lose sleep over it. It’s diabolical as far as I’m concerned.
But, circling back to close. Sasha is right & other experts have pointed this out too, so it’s not a lunatic fringe notion: the injections didn’t contain mRNA encoding full length “spike protein” because that’s technically impossible, certainly on scale. Just because the vials do not contain even roughly what we were told, does not mean that they’re not dangerous.
I love her analogy with vehicles. If you cannot make a Ford Explorer, you certainly cannot make a turbo variant!
As usual technological claims are presented as almost magical, when in fact the only technology that reliably works on their behalf is psychological and social manipulation. That is their "killer app". The technology is an afterthought and like much of Western 'advanced' science it is mainly marketing that does the job they require of it.