Documented extensive prior institutional knowledge that mRNA and DNA injections can be made into weapons and "legally" deployed on all of us as EUA Countermeasures under a faked pandemic.
Drs Sucharit Bhakdi and Luc Montaigner were calling for a stop to mRNA earlier in 2020
COVID-19, Urgent Reassessment, Diagnosis and Basic Principles of Infectiology: Open Letter from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi to German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel
Yes, I remember this, too. Think Sucharit was the first to warn & say why. We might have been the first to expand the range of toxicities, but it’s less important than asking as many people as possible to review the design and reach conclusions about expectations in the safety arena. Once you look, it’s obvious to those of us steeped in structure based design or rational drug discovery that there are numerous, deliberate toxicities built-in to the injections.
Hello Mike Yeadon: I posted links to your various statements on OffGuardian a few years ago. Got beat up and ridiculed by trolls and idiots. It was hard to sort out one idiot from the other, so I left the page rot. You were right on target over and over. The British are professional fools... Thank you for your many efforts.
You guys were heroes but earlier in the year the brave statistics and data experts not gripped by fear were alerting us to the bullshit framing of IFR and CFR as well as age adjustments. By March these guys convinced me we were in a MATRIX LEVEL SCAM . Also Fabio Vighi, Ernst Wolfe and a few other economists who know economics kills more surely than viruses were screaming about the 2019 bond scare. Here’s my track on these thoughts - thanks Mike.
Luc was, I'm not familiar with the other. The way virology has been present at Salk has been fraudulent since inception. I realize that many are not at all familiar with this. I suggest that those who want to know more start with the criticisms of Kary Mullis of Luc Montagnier. Kary, also a Nobel Prize winner, could not find an appropriate citiation for "HIV causes AIDS" when applying for a grant. It puzzled him. He researched the subject a great deal, and came to question the theory of HIV causing AIDS. He met Montagnier in person, and asked him for a citation. Montagnier, a Nobel Prize winner for discovering the HIV virus that supposedly cause AIDS, could not provide a scientific reference for the statement "HIV causes AIDS" either. I'm typing all this from memory, so expect that there may be a few errors. The previous text is just to prequel the remarks of Mullis himself. It's best to listen to him on the linked youtube videos. If you have any questions about the fraudulent nature of virology in academia listen to Mullis for 30 minutes to begin. It's a better starting point than I think anyone else can do including myself. https://charleswright1.substack.com/p/dr-kary-mullis-sounds-like-he-is?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2FLuc%2520Montagnier&utm_medium=reader2
Wow. Holy Cow. I just looked at that link of Mullis again. Youtube removed it for violating their terms of service. That's one of the reasons I transcribed so much of what he said. You have no idea how much this type of thing happens until you've seen it a few times. My references are often deleted.
Well I didn't transcribe the confrontation between Mullis and Montagnier as Mullis described it. But I did get plenty more.
"Yeah, right after I got the Nobel Prize in Chemistry man, I can remember writing a short 4-page hypothesis about what might in fact be a probable cause of AIDS. A hypothesis that was a useful one, because it suggested that disproves it or proves it. You know that's what a hypothesis is for. It's to sort of suggest experiments that will try to disprove the hypothesis, or if you can't disprove it, you start slowly accepting it. And so Lancent, Nature, Science, those people said 'we don't need the hypothesis directed at understanding what might be causing AIDS. We already know."
"And I called back the editors and I said now wait a minute. You got like, in Lancent they've got a section called medical hypothesis. That's a type of an article that you can submit. I said this is a hypothesis. This is a good hypothesis. Not only can it easily be proven with rats or mice, but in fact, if it turns out that this shows that this does cause AIDS, you'll have a model system. An animal model system which could be worth billions of dollars for the pharmaceutical industry. ... But not anybody would touch it."
"The number of cases reported went up epidemically, you know exponentially, because the number of tests that were done went up exponentially. The first time I ever saw one of these CDC graphs that showed the thing going off the page, you know I went up after that and I said how did you disentangle.. I mean did you divide the number you've got here by the number of tests that were done? I mean, can we believe that this line that you've drawn here about number of positive tests reported - is that really indicative of the spread of this virus? Is the virus- is there being more of it? Or are there more tests? If you divide by the number of tests you do, you don't get any kind of a curve going up. How many doctors knew about HIV in 1983? Two. How many knew about it in 1985? Say 500. How many knew about it in 1986? Forty thousand. So that's where the curve came from. They could have just said, how much money did we make of HIV this year, and they could have plotted that, and it would have looked the same."
"You can't expect the sheep to respect the best and brightest. They don't know the difference, really. I like humans, don't get me wrong, but basically the vast majority of them do not possess the ability who is and who isn't a really good scientist."
"The difference between (a belief) and science was established clearly, at least in England, in the 17th century by the Royal society. ... They probably don't remember this, the same bunch of assholes who won't accept my papers anymore. But they said there's a big difference between empirical science. Empirical scientist is something that can be done in front of other people. You can show it on a stage. I can do my experiment in front of anybody who was interested. We should all agree on the results. We don't have to worry about why."
"Nobody has actually purified HIV. There's no little bottle of HIV anywhere on the planet that's just got HIV in it. They've got cell lines that they think that it's growing in. There are a lot of people that think it's not even there at all. I wouldn't doubt that it's there, I think anything you can imagine is there somewhere. Whether it's there or not is not the question. The question is does it do anything with regard to this set of diseases that we now call AIDS. It's a tangled web of madness, by calling all those things AIDS."
"It's a real bizarre thing to have 100,000 people paid to do something that strange. To take a whole bunch of diseases, to lump them all into this one big thing... I mean, pretty soon there won't be anything that's not AIDS."
"The way to get rid of AIDS, is to stop funding it. Just stop everything that's called AIDS research."
"Why did they think it was just some virus that this guy Montagnier pulled out of a lymph node? When he could have pulled anything out of that lymph node? He probably had a hundred different things in there that he could have identified. Just pulled out.... you know why did anybody fall for that? .... The CDC wanted, you know they did want to have a plague, and it looked like a nice possibility, and they went for it."
"This particular whatever it is, you can't call it a hoax, you can't call it a conspiracy. It's something that's so bizarre, that to try to explain it to somebody... it's almost like they can't possibly believe how bad it is."
"The entire AIDS establishment is absolutely guilty of some hideous sins, and everybody's been fooled. Everybody on the planet have been fooled by a handful of greedy people without any scruples and no brains. That's hard to believe. It's like no, it can't be. My mother wouldn't go for it. I said mother I've studied this really well and I'm telling you, there ain't no epidemic mom. There isn't an epidemic. There isn't anything out there that's causing people to die that's called HIV. There's just not. "No Kary I read it everywhere I look." And I go mother, the entire medical establishment is wrong, and I'm right. "No you couldn't possibly be right Kary. They wouldn't do that. They couldn't possibly be wrong. Every radio station you listen to. Every television station. Everywhere you turn there's somebody telling you that there is an epidemic of some organism that is fatal and that you get it from sex."
"You know, there's a hundred thousand of them right. There's probably about half of those people that are just too dumb to know what they've done. They other half of them are too dishonest. They have not the heart, or reason, or the testicles to say you know what, we screwed up really bad. And I think we've got too many scientists anyhow. We might just take those guys out on the border and drop another bomb out there. Just get rid of them."
See Celia Farber's book " Serious Adverse Reactions: The Uncensored History of AIDS". Celia was a young journalist in NY and tried to expose Fauci and his poison AZT treatment while squashing other cheap repurposed drugs. See also several documentaries on the history of HIV/AIDS. This one points to HIV/AIDS being caused by vaccination programs in Africa.
As a separate matter to whether a pathogen was or wasn’t created, the more relevant questions include:
1. Was there a new cause of illness & death in the environment in spring 202? Denis Rancourt’s data on all causes mortality says NO.
2. Other than the appearance of a novel in the population, are there other ways in which a diagnostic test could be subverted to make it appear that there was a novel pathogen & disease? Yes. Lots of ways.
That "appearance" sure caused a lot of people to suffocate and die, with no outpatient therapeutics offered deliberately. If there was nothing new released, why the concerted effort to block the stuff that worked?
Because existing illnesses could always have been better managed than generally they were.
This is a diagnosis of false attribution, so if it was possible to help sone (many?) of such sick people, the therapy free vista into which the really important items (to her perpetrators) could be in jeopardy
JJ Couey hypothesizes that cDNA clones could have been released at various hot spots like NYC. Lots of elderly in care homes were palliated to death because they had a "new disease with no cure". Lots of people had bacterial pneumonia and were not given antibiotics.
They did. Montagnier was another Salk Institute virus scammer. Montagnier was among the first to say "ADE." I wrote about it a few times, and believed it for awhile. It finally dawned on me that the vaccines were creating the virus sequences in their entirety. The vaccines were not mutating them. That was just a false narrative to support the false lab leak narrative.
Charles is correct re HIV, Salk and virology and that stands for synthetic biology too.
The more computer science involved, the easer to generate fraude and higher is the satisfaction of the intellectual masturbators (= the "good academics" following the governments' lines).
You need to read the work of the late Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos - the Perth group.
There's at least two good docu films on HIV/AIDS. One is an old BBC production (yes by the British brainwashing corporation), and other is the House or cards I believe. I may be wrong about the exact title and don't remember the BBC made's title.
CORRECTION. The title of the film is House of numbers. You can find it on odysee.
So many people have jumped onto the Covid analysis bandwagon. So many words! But I always come back to Luc Montagnier, Mike Yeardon and Bhakti and Stephanie Seneff. And one short article by Professor Fraser. And recently I’ll add Professor Dagleish to that list. Clear, short, commonsense and they don’t ‘blind you with the science’. And for historical perspective read Dr Mary’s Monkey, which I was told about in 2015.
Nov 15, 2023·edited Nov 15, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova
>At this point, I haven’t seen anything that says to me that Pfizer or Bill Gates or Harari or Klaus Schwab or Tedros or any of the others envisioned, or the senior scientists at the vaccine research center, envisioned that this would be a lethal bioweapon and I frankly object to that language that’s often bandied about without any clear evidence to support it other than inference
They maimed and killed all the animals in the two decades of trials leading up to the rollout, Bob.
That's democide. A crime against humanity. The people who developed and rolled out these bioweapons need to hang.
How's that for some 'language' Bob?
Edit: Thank you Sasha, for the devastating take down of this nonsense above from Bob. Give me a break!
Hello ExcessDeathsAU: Your comment is spot on. I'm not a biological "expert" in any sense of the term, but it only took me one three hour tour back in 2020 to find evidence of massive biological harm due to mRNA "testing". I agree that ALL perpetrators need to hang. Mr. Malone should be stationed at the back of the line, so he can contemplate his turn...Thanks for posting.
I genuinely laughed out loud at your last sentence - thanks Paul.
Absolutely agree on all counts. All it took was a bit of curiosity to see what was being injected, and as for the 'doctors' in the medical centres? I have nothing but contempt for them. All the papers were there, are still there, and if they did not look, line them up (as you say). And if they did look? Get in line just as well.
Smartest guy I know is my handyman. When they proposed this in early 2020 he looked at me and said "it's going to kill tens of millions and they will start a giant war to cover it up." He should really be writing a Substack.
Glad you enjoyed my suggestion. I have more respect for the average handyman and tinker than any alleged doctor. At least a good handyman knows how to fix things without breaking them...
I wrote a story on Your Local Epidemiologist, who is a menace and is not going to stop until she gets even more censorship and control. I note that she has more than 20,000 paid subscribers and more than 211,000 total subscribers. If Jessica Rose is right, you are the ONLY "Covid skeptic" who ranks in the Top 30 Substack authors in the "Science" category. That is bizarre as Covid skeptics actually put Substack on the map.
YLE is a fake - it is a CDC marketing department, funded by federal dollars laundered through 20K fake social media profiles. Katelyn was a CDC employee and now a "consultant", lol. There are no 20K morons who want to pay actual money to read CDC propaganda which is available for free on that stack and on every mass media. I generally believe in stupidity, but YLE stretches my beliefs too much.
And the scary part is Substack's founders and PR folks keep promoting the site. They did a big feature story on her that all Substack authors got. I bet Substack has never contacted you and asked if they could profile your Substack success story.
It's important that those who go against the olde world take on reality- like Sasha- can write freely without censorship. Junk sites are probably more to do with hooking in junk minds who will eventually stumble across some searing realities - Ss being its own highly functioning ecosystem. She may not be promoted the same way, but timing is everything.
Imho Substack is a time bomb that will go off when they mean it to, the same way Facebook did, but for different reasons.
You do recall Bill I assume when an offer was made for existing SubStack authors to invest in the effort? You must have gotten a message to said effect. I did, and I believe you have been posting as an Author longer than I have, so presumably it was sent to all. Well, I thought about it, decided not to seek council from my significant other, and just like at Vegas - I put some funds into it for the fun of it. Bottom line though is I have records of all of this, and the fees paid, which were not trivial, and I have standing above and beyond just being an Author as well.
I remember that. Stay tuned to my site for future articles on a "Plan B" if Substack is effectively captured. I also think from my big subscription drive that 99 percent of Substack authors can't make a real living from this model. I think the Powers that Be are going to wait out many authors who will give up their "Independent" journalism.
I'm not in that group. I had some savings - stocks I could sell - to subsidize me in my first year - those are about gone. I think 1 percent of 1 percent of Substack authors can make, say, $40,000 year from doing this. Most of the key writers have other incomes from spouses or savings and don't need to depend on Substack exclusively to pay the bills.
It's a big issue I tried to highlight in my Big Subscription Drive (which you helped make a pretty good success!).
Bill - there will still be those who aren't seeking to be 'independent journalists', they just want to put their pound of flesh out there for people to read.
If you want to make money from the internet, the marketing is far more important than what you write. Sadly. After all, if 80% of the people are credulous, ignorant and not scientifically trained, there will be significant subpopulations who believe all kinds of nonsense.
If you look at climate alarmism and equally charlatan-esque writers who predict 'devilishly cold winters' year after year without being called out as frauds, you will find the exact comparator to Covidian sheep and 'viruses don't exist' false binaries.
Well as an angel investor in Substack, this rubs me the wrong way.
OK, I admit, I'm maybe not an "angel" investor, and in fact, being I was not certified to be an "investor" in said instruments, my investment was limited to $2200 I think, but I made an investment, so I have standing to inquire about some decisions being made.
You want to argue that?
I have standing.
Now - I just need to figure out the status of said investment, cause the info has been essentially nothing but silence and I'm wondering - what happened to those funds?
Jessica Rose speculates it might not be Substack per se that's changing things. Who has access to the computer servers or the companies that process the payments?
It's never made sense to me "they" would go so hard after social media companies and completely ignore Substack, which is growing rapidly and is full of brilliant contrarians.
They might have been content to leave it alone for a while (let us all vent here), but once this speech platform started, say, making more people "vaccine hesitant" - they couldn't let that stand. They also left Tucker Carlson alone for years ... until they went after him.
At some point, they "got to" Matt Drudge and probably bought him out. They got James O'Keefe. They damn sure got Julian Assange. They got the J-6 insurrectionists and sent would -be revolutionaries a message they couldn't miss.
To me, it seems inevitable they'll come after Substack (and might already be doing this). They are just getting started on the most important parts of their unfinished agendas. For example, they can't have Substack authors railing against central bank digital currency or the next phase of Climate Change or that WHO "treaty."
I hope I'm wrong and Substack doesn't "go wobbly." In the meantime ... post while you still can.
Yes, I have spoken of this as well - it's a Hundred Flowers operation, similar to the Twitter blue ticks. Ditto to the God/Jesus. I go hard in that aspect and get a phenomenal amount of abuse.
Of particular interest to me as an Author is the following:
~
First and foremost, you own what you create. Any original content you post, upload, share, store, or otherwise provide to Substack remains yours and is protected by copyright and any other applicable intellectual property laws.
Eric Coppolino and Dr. Tenpenny are also in there.
As someone who began writing about the plandemic here in November of 2020 (and getting chastised by Substack for doing so), I agree with your last sentence. I don't know of anyone else who was covering these topics here back then. But within a year that changed dramatically.
An annual paid sub for her is $50 ($60 for those who opt to pay $6/month). If 10 percent of her (allegedly) 211,000 subscribers are paid ... that's 21,100 paid subscribers and at least $1 million in gross revenue. And, as my article points out, she's in demand on the speaking and Disinformation Gala circuit, where I'm sure she's being paid.
By way of comparison, I have 216 paid subscribers. My take-away: her version of the truth sells a lot better than my version.
I also know that most Substack authors only have 2 to 4 percent as their "paid" subscriber ratio. How did she get to 10 percent?
Good question. Last time I checked, with 4% of the worlds population we had 15% of the worlds covid deaths. If we assume, as we are being told, that many if not most of those deaths are due to the jabs, then it seems we can safely say that yes, a large percentage are and will be dying here in the US. Ed Dowds numbers bear this out.
And as one of my readers asked, what the heck are those paid subscribers actually paying for or why? They could get the exact same propaganda from 200 MSM sites and every world official ... for free.
big pharma, US and Israeli military troops and funding. A surprising portion of the Israeli population are paid commenters on targeted alternative media.
Bill those are all bot subscriptions. it's a truth ministry money laundering operation. probably goes to the democratic party just like all that ukraine money
They all knew. They just didn't care, and they still don't. Maiming and murdering humanity pays too well for them to EVER stop what they're doing. It's up to us to make sure that murdering and maiming people for a living is too dangerous a profession to be worth the $.
People who murder and maim others for a living need to start enjoying the life expectancy of a housefly at a large family party with ten swatters per square foot. Since when did we accept this new "rule" that they may murder us with impunity, but we're not allowed to fight back? Our courts will not permit a CIVIL remedy. Our elections are fully RIGGED so there is no remedy there. Are they ALL absolutely CERTAIN they prefer the alternative to a CIVIL remedy?
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn wrote in the Gulag Archipelago :
"Here is a riddle not for us contemporaries to figure out: Why is Germany allowed to punish the evildoers and Russia is not? What kind of disastrous path lies ahead of us if we do not have the chance to purge ourselves of the putrefaction rotting inside our body? What, then can Russia teach the World?
By an unexpected turn of our history, a bit of the truth, an insignificant part of the whole, was allowed out in the open. But those same hands which once screwed tight our handcuffs now hold their palms out for reconciliation: "No, Don't dig up the past! Dwell on the past and you'll loose an eye" But the proverb goes on to say: 'Forget the past any you'll lose both eyes'"
It would seem that our inability/failure to hold government employees, the military, scientist, members of the Public Health, influencers NGO, NPO and others for their Covid crimes - stems in part from our failure to hold them and others for past crimes. Such a list would include HIV, Lyme Disease, SV-40, vaccine lies, sterility programs, corruption of the education system, instigation of Ukraine wars, 9-11, numerous false flags and so on. Our country is almost completely Blind
We, everyday citizens, must hold ourselves accountable first.
Example - When plastics were introduced, we knew they were harmful, but we allowed ourselves to be lulled by a lie called "recycling" which let us off the hook in a multitude of ways as long as we bought the lie by participating. "Recycling" even gave us an opportunity to virtue-signal our participation in the lies. We accepted the horrors of plastics because they were CONVENIENT. It's so much easier to rip open plastic then throw it away than it is to wash glass and cart it to a redemption center for actual real recycling and advantageous to the plastic makers who didn't want to spend money properly disposing of toxic petroleum by-products or recycle glass or ship glass, etc. Now we are polluted with toxic plastic in the innermost reaches of our bodies. Babies nurse it from their mother's breasts. Marine animals are dying of contamination. Plastic microparticles rain down from every square centimeter of sky on every square centimeter of the earth.
We are responsible. We have colluded with our perpetrators. We can't hold the perps responsible until we hold ourselves responsible. It's a simple math equation.
Why is anyone surprised we are still doing it? God help us. He's the only One who can.
Exactly this. We are convenienced into slavery on all fronts.
Look at all the awake ppl using every since Google products! In the beginning I have explained them in great detail the issue, I even provide them with excellent alternatives. Do they care? No. :(((
In my head I am like "go get vaxxed up, you are an enabler, no better than the rest".
As Satan tries to prove we are no better than animals and God is wrong to hold us in any regard, he uses the same techniques of control as are used to domesticate animals. Dogs, cattle, etc. Give an animal the basic necessities of life or even a little better than basic and they will follow you in servitude or to slaughter.
I beg to differ. The biblical story of three boys who stood instead of bowing to the king and were thrown into the furnace where they later emerged unscathed, just stood. They didn't try to get others around them to stand. Others tried to get the boys to bow like they were bowing because they thought the boys were idiots and fools and throwing their lives away. But the boys would not bow down. They simply stood by what they knew was right. They would bow to no man. King or no king. Only to God Himself.
At the end of this story who is the fool and who is the wiser? Who is loved and who is forgotten?
Yes, the plastics nightmare is just about overwhelming to contemplate. Probably only solved when the Sun performs it's next micronova. It's about due and likely to occur within the next two decades. You can learn more about this from Ben Davidson and his YT channel "Suspicious Observers".
Commenting on the eye-opening Urso-Malone exchange (before finishing Sasha's entire post):
I cannot help remarking that Urso's acknowledgment of Malone’s claim that reasearch on bioweapons was so compartmentalized ("silo-ed" as Malone calls it) that only the top scientists could have been aware of the deadly intentions --and Malone’s eagerness to agree to that -- puts Malone in the odd position of inadvertently having to come to a realization that he's only able to continue to act as if he did not comprehend the evil intentions if he also admits he was NOT one of those "top scientists" able to make that determination.
I think that realization was what made Malone stammer through his last passage quoted here.
Lying demands excellent memory - a particular kind of memory. Sooner or later they will contradict themselves and/or show inconsistencies in their "stories".
Tereza Coraggio has a long list of excellent observations about Malone.
Liars always find a justification for it. 'You can't handle the truth!' being the classic projection. I'm always amazed at how the 'successful' members of my family (successful in rising the greasy pole and earning shedloads) are completely incapable of facing up to basic truths, yet still claim that they have to be in control and have to tell me what to think (the classic being that 'only the Labour Party can save the country').
Lying is the sport for those that want to rise up the greasy pole in fields where lying is de rigeur. You know, like politics, diplomacy, working in the media.
The thing about the web, the web of lies and the web of the internet - the discerning mind can differentiate and then when the wave of retribution forms, it will be undeniable.
I'm pretty sure the wave has already formed.
I'm pretty sure many already know.
I'm pretty sure that I'm pretty sure I don't know for sure what will happen next, but I take solace and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in sentiment.
Ken - the internet was a great boon for those who were intellectually mature by the time it came around. You really don't want unlimited informational sources if your mind can't process its veracity easily and efficiently.
I wouldn't want to be born in the 21st century and constantly exposed to the internet. How on earth do you ground yourself with no ability to sift through that veritable deluge of conflicting information?
Yep. That is why it wouldn't bother me in the least if the whole thing went down and it is also why we got our kids out onto trails for real in the forest when they were young. Now they love hiking as much as me and the love of my life do.....imagine that!
You and I have something in common, then, Ken. I spent my formative years in my 20s hiking most weekends, rock climbing as well, fell-running too. And I did it in the days when you couldn't alert mountain rescue with a mobile phone, you had to take responsibility to navigate and, if necessary, to retreat. I learned more of value in mountains than I did at University and it's proven its worth for a lifetime.
great article, a look at all the weak greedy, venal, morons who've traded their souls for a few greasy bucks pay working for the death machine - Hows that gonna go down with God at their Hell or Heaven interview ????
They'll get arrested, tried, found guilty & jailed for crimes against humanity once sanity returns to Earth, knowledge employed for pure evil is no excuse.
Always good to see that raptor Malone get called out, who's he suing this week???
'Malone, Steve Kirsch & other DoD spokesmen are running a distraction maneuver to keep attention away from the intentional toxicity of the biochemical weapons, the DoD/WHO control of the programs & the fact that “biodefense” is camouflage for straight-up State-sponsored biowarfare, conducted by bringing pharmaceutical companies into the military-industrial-Congressional complex, calling bioweapons “vaccines,” & terrifying ppl into taking them under “public health emergency” & “pandemic” narratives'.
Katherine Watt
God bless Dr Mike Yeadon who's been out front warning humanity right from the begining at great personal cost
Thank you Sasha for speaking out, I will never forget seeing your presentation where you revealed all the DOD jab contracts - it was one of those pivotal moments because your evidence banged them all to rights, there was no where for them to hide, you laid it out, so brave of you, I will never forget it, you singlehandedly murdered the lot of them with that presentation, no one really knew what was going on before then, but we do now, thanks to you & you just keep outting the criminals with your knowledge & insight - thank God
It's from a post of hers from 28th October 2023 titled
Whatever is in the biochemical weapons bearing Pfizer and other pharma labels, is there because US SecDefs and their WHO-BIS handlers ordered it to be there
If you go to her substack it's the 8th post down.
I posted that quote elsewhere & got a barrage of criticism off ppl who have no clue who is really who & who is behind them, their deep state handlers.
If Ms Watt says it true, then I believe her 100%, she knows what's going on in a manner most of us don't
Thanks for replying. I will look it up and read it. Highly recommend her recent interview with a English Podcaster. I was moved by Katherine’s emotion about the failure of many lawyers to take action against this evil.
Good to know this little bit of background. Thanks for sharing, Mike! It makes me appreciate the interview & James even more. I shall look forward to watching more of his work.
James had a very natural, extraordinary way of making Katherine laugh in a manner that I’ve not seen before in any other interview. Something about his sensitivity & almost self-deprecating kind of humor helped bring out Katherine’s tender honesty & emotions regarding the plandemic - the separation & isolation it has caused her to experience with friends and associates; the lack of interest of attorneys in addressing the DOD connections based on her research; .& the incomprehensible evil that is arrayed against humanity. It was a very poignant & at moments raw exchange between two concerned individuals.
You, Katherine, Sasha, and so many others who are the frontliners or steely “prophets” of Truth have had to bear a heavy burden. Though I knew this in my heart and in an intellectual sense, the interview with Katherine made me FEEL your burdens. It was a deeply visceral understanding which moved my Spirit. I HEAR YOUR CRIES IN THE WILDERNESS!
How could anyone not do their part to help further the work you all have done & are still doing? No, I don’t have the capacity to reach hundreds and thousands as you frontliners but I do what I can at every opportunity to speak with people and spread the Truths that have come to Light. I haven’t been sleeping very much as I read and view, respectively, as many articles/videos as I can. I try to be up-to-date and informed as to the latest for, as you know, new revelations (eg. DNA Plasmids, SV-40, “hidden” gene, etc.) create an ever changing landscape.
I would be remiss for not joining in the trenches in this WAR of wars. Thus, every day I plant seeds wherever I can.
How interesting that you, James, & Katherine all experienced an about face in your spirituality. Katherine has spoken about having turned aside from her faith for many years. Yet looking into the dark soul of “the Monster” brought her back “Home” again. Surely, the same holds true for many others around the world who have “the eyes to see and the ears to hear” or, as you stated early on in an interview, the ability to connect the dots.
I have previously read the book of Isaiah but recently my eyes were drawn to the following chapter/verses which I’d like to share with you because it made me think of all the frontliner “prophets” who are putting their lives on the line to warn people of what’s happening and what is still to come:
12 You should not say, “It is a conspiracy,”
concerning all that this people calls a conspiracy,
neither fear their threats
nor be afraid of them.
13 Sanctify the Lord of Hosts Himself,
and let Him be your fear,
and let Him be your dread.
Isaiah (MEV)
Thank you so much Mike for all that you’ve done on behalf of Mankind. You do what you do because it’s the right thing to do. You ARE having an impact, but remember results are not so important as your motive. God may be closing the ears and hearts of people for a reason. He did the same with Pharaoh when Moses sought freedom for his people. Yet no matter, the work must continue.
May God protect you, keep you strong, and temper your faith like Damascus Steel.
Have you tried him yet on 'the role of the SAS, MI6 et al in promoting genocides and global fascism worldwide?'
He had many sacred cows 15 years ago and they all came out when he was hating 'Liberal Democrats', which basically came down to him being a Brexiteer and the Libdems being pro-EU, whereas the Liberal Democrats became popular under Charlie Kennedy due to their principled stand against the Iraq war. I joined the Libdems for that reason, left with dignity when it became clear that I disagreed with them on climate change and the EU.
Usually, people projecting hatred onto others betray that they have major unresolved issues in their psyche.
Hopefully, he's resolved his desire for extreme financial inequality to represent 'humanity'. He's never experienced extreme poverty in his life and I guarantee you that he wouldn't be able to cope with it. Having been born into a family that could afford private education, he has no clue about the ennervating grind of poverty. I do - I experienced it doing a PhD on £2756 in the late 1980s.
It's something I'd like every right wing libertarian to experience to teach them quite how useless they are when all the trappings of middle class upbringings are removed from them.
No tailor made shirts, no replacement even of Marks and Spencers underwear: just keep wearing those clothes until they wear out and then keep on wearing them until your luck changes.
Experience 2 bouts of 14 days of flu in one winter for the only time in your life in the third year of poverty.
Delingpole wouldn't understand that, any more than the fascist Andrew Roberts would understand having his leg blown off in Afghanistan.
Sasha, did you catch RM's performance at this week's hearing? He not only doubled-down on denying bad motive, but even lied under oath. He said that "about two years ago" he called for the jabs to be withdrawn "across the board even for the elderly." Any of us who were playing attention remember many instances of him advocating the jabs for the elderly throughout 2021, his refusal to recommend against the jab at the fall 2021 staged gathering with Hawaiian children, and his January 2022 letter in the Washington Times where he limited his Covid jab concerns to "healthy" children. He is now re-writing his own history via the congressional record.
Around 2:56 he states: "It's been the position of myself and the Physicians that I'm affiliated with physician Health Associates in the global Co Summit as of about two years ago that we believe that these products are neither safe nor effective and should be withdrawn across the board even for the elderly." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNkWEcctCpc
MTG has supported funding for Ukraine. It’s pretty likely that she supports funding for Israel. I feel her hearing was really a dog and pony show to allow controlled opposition actors like Robert Malone to cover his ass. Whereas we all thought she was a true patriot in the beginning she turned out to be a sellout. She’s a pretty deep idiot if she couldn’t figure out that all the money going to Ukraine was actually being laundered. Come on!
It sounds like MTG is not that stupid. She made money from the stock trade (oil and defence ) just before the Ukraine war 'broke out '. She also owns mRNA and Remdesiver (ref to her financial disclosure report).
Or maybe she is psychic and can predict the future? :-P
Police (Arizona State or Showlow sheriff, I don't recall) came and shot him dead. Could probably look it up with a search engine. No more Hour of the Time!
Nov 15, 2023·edited Nov 15, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova
Thank you Sasha, for your the depth, breadth, and detail of your posts in general, and this one in particular.
Overwhelmed with the flood of information now available on substack and alternatives to mass media propaganda and big tech social media ... I've really struggled to find my way by framing universal truths of human nature.
One of those truths is that similar to the way in which we tend to be constrained by our own temperament and social circumstances, we also tend to be constrained by a somewhat parochial view of history. The myth of collective moral progress tends to steer us into smugly presuming that we live in a 'modern' era, qualitatively different from more barbaric times.
When I think of all the historic examples of man's ruthless inhumanity to man — those who profited from the suffering of others for their own self-indulgence or amusement, and if justified at all, with a glib 'for the common good' — it chills me to realize that same quality and quantity of sociopathy has always been in our gene pool. A pro-active, ambitious, evil.
Those who rise to join the good fight, appear to be those who are awakened to the fact that we are not so much 'led' by those of good will, as 'herded' by predators. Those of genuine good will are not predisposed to fight fellow humans, and so we are perpetually engaged in a rearguard action, playing catch-up to those conspiracies of evil.
Thank you for your shield and armor in this forever war of mankind against its own worst nature.
Mr Martin - the lesson I've learned going through life is that there are times you must just absorb information like a sponge, without trying to process it immediately. Then a time comes when you must grapple with it to reach conclusions. My experience is that during that grappling phase, it's often best to withdraw initially, not to try and absorb any more. Then you draw up a hypothesis and you can return to the information sources with the intent of clarifying your hypothesis/modifying it in the light of new evidence.
One useful lesson I've had is that the more subjects you look into in depth, the more useful lessons you learn about patterns found throughout the world. You learn about how unquestioned dogmas arose, whether or not they are actually right and how those dogmas eventually get overturned.
As for being 'herded', it's more to do with projection of mental issues onto others - narcissists need admiration, whereas psychopaths need submission. Quite frankly, I've refused to submit to either and it doesn't do you much good.
Everyone who tests positive for Covid is being given Paxlovid by their doctor. This medication is dangerous and has a black box warning on it. So people aren’t getting the vax, but many are getting Paxlovid. What is this doing to public health? It can’t be good.
Given the prevalence of previous infections and the vaccines, my guess would be a high false positive rate. Add asymptomatic infections that are also being prescribed Paxlovid, and this is another scandal that is not getting the attention and alternative press that it should be getting IMO. Given the dearth of vaccine uptake at present, unfettered Paxlovid prescriptions could be the bigger extant public health crisis. Just an opinion. I do not have any data.
Malone really let the mask slip there. I was smiling as I imagined the pressure he is under as the plasmid and SV40 stories are becoming widely known. Imagine having to try and square that circle!
You'd have to assert things like:
They 'unintentionally and with the best of intentions' deleted the SV40 sequence labeling on the plasmid before submitting it to regulatory agencies...
They faked efficacy by insisting on a 2 week window because in their heart they just knew the vaccines were good for you even if they had to fake the evidence of efficacy...
Every drug company chose the spike protein serendipitously as the target antigen for their vaccines despite it being the most potentially dangerous and certainly the most supicious part of sars-cov-2...
They omited the genotoxicity studies (Malone got his notoreity by pointing this out in the Dark Horse podcast) out of their overwhelming concern for saving humanity fromt he scourge of covid...
They fought hard in court to bury the pfizer fake trial and approval docs for 75 years because they just didn't want people to misinterpret them and fuel silly vaccine hesitancy...
It was a new thing called 'mild' myocarditis because if you worry about the heart damage they gave you, you might die of a heart attack!
I can't go on. I'm glad I don't have Malone's job.
Drs Sucharit Bhakdi and Luc Montaigner were calling for a stop to mRNA earlier in 2020
COVID-19, Urgent Reassessment, Diagnosis and Basic Principles of Infectiology: Open Letter from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi to German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel
https://www.globalresearch.ca/open-letter-professor-sucharit-bhakdi-german-chancellor-dr-angela-merkel
I remember Bhakdi warning on this. Powerful and bone-chiiling predictions.
Same. I was impressed by his elegant whiteboard explanations and simple manner, exactly as one expects from a decent scientist and human.
September 25, 2020
WARNING: Renowned Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi Warns Against Hastily Created Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine (video)
https://rairfoundation.com/warning-renowned-virologist-sucharit-bhakdi-warns-against-hastily-created-gene-altering-coronavirus-vaccine-video/
Thanks for the link.
Yes, I remember this, too. Think Sucharit was the first to warn & say why. We might have been the first to expand the range of toxicities, but it’s less important than asking as many people as possible to review the design and reach conclusions about expectations in the safety arena. Once you look, it’s obvious to those of us steeped in structure based design or rational drug discovery that there are numerous, deliberate toxicities built-in to the injections.
Hello Mike Yeadon: I posted links to your various statements on OffGuardian a few years ago. Got beat up and ridiculed by trolls and idiots. It was hard to sort out one idiot from the other, so I left the page rot. You were right on target over and over. The British are professional fools... Thank you for your many efforts.
You guys were heroes but earlier in the year the brave statistics and data experts not gripped by fear were alerting us to the bullshit framing of IFR and CFR as well as age adjustments. By March these guys convinced me we were in a MATRIX LEVEL SCAM . Also Fabio Vighi, Ernst Wolfe and a few other economists who know economics kills more surely than viruses were screaming about the 2019 bond scare. Here’s my track on these thoughts - thanks Mike.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mmAhPm8deMs&pp=ygUfTW9jayB0aGUgc2V0IHVwIHRoaW1ibmFpbCBncmVlbg%3D%3D
Good song. As we all learned, anything the perpetrators do not like gets squashed.
Video: Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Who Discovered HIV Says Coronavirus Was Created in Laboratory
https://www.globalresearch.ca/nobel-prize-winning-scientist-who-discovered-hiv-says-coronavirus-created-laboratory
Everything about Salk is a fraud, sorry if you haven't figured it out yet.
Are you saying Luc Montagnier and/or Sucharit Bhakdi are frauds?
Luc was, I'm not familiar with the other. The way virology has been present at Salk has been fraudulent since inception. I realize that many are not at all familiar with this. I suggest that those who want to know more start with the criticisms of Kary Mullis of Luc Montagnier. Kary, also a Nobel Prize winner, could not find an appropriate citiation for "HIV causes AIDS" when applying for a grant. It puzzled him. He researched the subject a great deal, and came to question the theory of HIV causing AIDS. He met Montagnier in person, and asked him for a citation. Montagnier, a Nobel Prize winner for discovering the HIV virus that supposedly cause AIDS, could not provide a scientific reference for the statement "HIV causes AIDS" either. I'm typing all this from memory, so expect that there may be a few errors. The previous text is just to prequel the remarks of Mullis himself. It's best to listen to him on the linked youtube videos. If you have any questions about the fraudulent nature of virology in academia listen to Mullis for 30 minutes to begin. It's a better starting point than I think anyone else can do including myself. https://charleswright1.substack.com/p/dr-kary-mullis-sounds-like-he-is?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2FLuc%2520Montagnier&utm_medium=reader2
Wow. Holy Cow. I just looked at that link of Mullis again. Youtube removed it for violating their terms of service. That's one of the reasons I transcribed so much of what he said. You have no idea how much this type of thing happens until you've seen it a few times. My references are often deleted.
Well I didn't transcribe the confrontation between Mullis and Montagnier as Mullis described it. But I did get plenty more.
"Yeah, right after I got the Nobel Prize in Chemistry man, I can remember writing a short 4-page hypothesis about what might in fact be a probable cause of AIDS. A hypothesis that was a useful one, because it suggested that disproves it or proves it. You know that's what a hypothesis is for. It's to sort of suggest experiments that will try to disprove the hypothesis, or if you can't disprove it, you start slowly accepting it. And so Lancent, Nature, Science, those people said 'we don't need the hypothesis directed at understanding what might be causing AIDS. We already know."
"And I called back the editors and I said now wait a minute. You got like, in Lancent they've got a section called medical hypothesis. That's a type of an article that you can submit. I said this is a hypothesis. This is a good hypothesis. Not only can it easily be proven with rats or mice, but in fact, if it turns out that this shows that this does cause AIDS, you'll have a model system. An animal model system which could be worth billions of dollars for the pharmaceutical industry. ... But not anybody would touch it."
"The number of cases reported went up epidemically, you know exponentially, because the number of tests that were done went up exponentially. The first time I ever saw one of these CDC graphs that showed the thing going off the page, you know I went up after that and I said how did you disentangle.. I mean did you divide the number you've got here by the number of tests that were done? I mean, can we believe that this line that you've drawn here about number of positive tests reported - is that really indicative of the spread of this virus? Is the virus- is there being more of it? Or are there more tests? If you divide by the number of tests you do, you don't get any kind of a curve going up. How many doctors knew about HIV in 1983? Two. How many knew about it in 1985? Say 500. How many knew about it in 1986? Forty thousand. So that's where the curve came from. They could have just said, how much money did we make of HIV this year, and they could have plotted that, and it would have looked the same."
"You can't expect the sheep to respect the best and brightest. They don't know the difference, really. I like humans, don't get me wrong, but basically the vast majority of them do not possess the ability who is and who isn't a really good scientist."
"The difference between (a belief) and science was established clearly, at least in England, in the 17th century by the Royal society. ... They probably don't remember this, the same bunch of assholes who won't accept my papers anymore. But they said there's a big difference between empirical science. Empirical scientist is something that can be done in front of other people. You can show it on a stage. I can do my experiment in front of anybody who was interested. We should all agree on the results. We don't have to worry about why."
"Nobody has actually purified HIV. There's no little bottle of HIV anywhere on the planet that's just got HIV in it. They've got cell lines that they think that it's growing in. There are a lot of people that think it's not even there at all. I wouldn't doubt that it's there, I think anything you can imagine is there somewhere. Whether it's there or not is not the question. The question is does it do anything with regard to this set of diseases that we now call AIDS. It's a tangled web of madness, by calling all those things AIDS."
"It's a real bizarre thing to have 100,000 people paid to do something that strange. To take a whole bunch of diseases, to lump them all into this one big thing... I mean, pretty soon there won't be anything that's not AIDS."
"The way to get rid of AIDS, is to stop funding it. Just stop everything that's called AIDS research."
"Why did they think it was just some virus that this guy Montagnier pulled out of a lymph node? When he could have pulled anything out of that lymph node? He probably had a hundred different things in there that he could have identified. Just pulled out.... you know why did anybody fall for that? .... The CDC wanted, you know they did want to have a plague, and it looked like a nice possibility, and they went for it."
"This particular whatever it is, you can't call it a hoax, you can't call it a conspiracy. It's something that's so bizarre, that to try to explain it to somebody... it's almost like they can't possibly believe how bad it is."
"The entire AIDS establishment is absolutely guilty of some hideous sins, and everybody's been fooled. Everybody on the planet have been fooled by a handful of greedy people without any scruples and no brains. That's hard to believe. It's like no, it can't be. My mother wouldn't go for it. I said mother I've studied this really well and I'm telling you, there ain't no epidemic mom. There isn't an epidemic. There isn't anything out there that's causing people to die that's called HIV. There's just not. "No Kary I read it everywhere I look." And I go mother, the entire medical establishment is wrong, and I'm right. "No you couldn't possibly be right Kary. They wouldn't do that. They couldn't possibly be wrong. Every radio station you listen to. Every television station. Everywhere you turn there's somebody telling you that there is an epidemic of some organism that is fatal and that you get it from sex."
"You know, there's a hundred thousand of them right. There's probably about half of those people that are just too dumb to know what they've done. They other half of them are too dishonest. They have not the heart, or reason, or the testicles to say you know what, we screwed up really bad. And I think we've got too many scientists anyhow. We might just take those guys out on the border and drop another bomb out there. Just get rid of them."
Yes I believe it.
I will try to look into this myself but I'm not a scientist, so I have to do the best I can, and it will be slow going.
It's very hard for me to doubt Dr Bhakdi, who is as far as I understand it is the most cited scientist in Germany.
Also, as far as I remember from what I read, Dr Montagnier did not think HIV caused AIDS.
Add to this the whole body of work of the late Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos - the Perth group.
https://www.research-gate.net/scientific-contributions/Eleni-Papadopulos-Eleopulos-33949078
An interview. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjinterviewep.htm
You’re implying there isn’t a Covid made in a lab virus?
See Celia Farber's book " Serious Adverse Reactions: The Uncensored History of AIDS". Celia was a young journalist in NY and tried to expose Fauci and his poison AZT treatment while squashing other cheap repurposed drugs. See also several documentaries on the history of HIV/AIDS. This one points to HIV/AIDS being caused by vaccination programs in Africa.
The Origin of AIDS
https://youtu.be/gRTpThZrDAY?si=OWFJKKOg5DgPldtE
They created a dud or they created a psyop. I'd bet on the latter.
As a separate matter to whether a pathogen was or wasn’t created, the more relevant questions include:
1. Was there a new cause of illness & death in the environment in spring 202? Denis Rancourt’s data on all causes mortality says NO.
2. Other than the appearance of a novel in the population, are there other ways in which a diagnostic test could be subverted to make it appear that there was a novel pathogen & disease? Yes. Lots of ways.
That "appearance" sure caused a lot of people to suffocate and die, with no outpatient therapeutics offered deliberately. If there was nothing new released, why the concerted effort to block the stuff that worked?
Because existing illnesses could always have been better managed than generally they were.
This is a diagnosis of false attribution, so if it was possible to help sone (many?) of such sick people, the therapy free vista into which the really important items (to her perpetrators) could be in jeopardy
JJ Couey hypothesizes that cDNA clones could have been released at various hot spots like NYC. Lots of elderly in care homes were palliated to death because they had a "new disease with no cure". Lots of people had bacterial pneumonia and were not given antibiotics.
They did. Montagnier was another Salk Institute virus scammer. Montagnier was among the first to say "ADE." I wrote about it a few times, and believed it for awhile. It finally dawned on me that the vaccines were creating the virus sequences in their entirety. The vaccines were not mutating them. That was just a false narrative to support the false lab leak narrative.
Could it be both?
Hey, I post this for you too.
Charles is correct re HIV, Salk and virology and that stands for synthetic biology too.
The more computer science involved, the easer to generate fraude and higher is the satisfaction of the intellectual masturbators (= the "good academics" following the governments' lines).
You need to read the work of the late Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos - the Perth group.
Here's an interview with her: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjinterviewep.htm
Or Mark Bailey https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
https://www.research-gate.net/scientific-contributions/Eleni-Papadopulos-Eleopulos-33949078
There's at least two good docu films on HIV/AIDS. One is an old BBC production (yes by the British brainwashing corporation), and other is the House or cards I believe. I may be wrong about the exact title and don't remember the BBC made's title.
CORRECTION. The title of the film is House of numbers. You can find it on odysee.
Here's one.
https://youtu.be/l5ykGc6IIG8?si=R7oQ5QAIpqTKvRK6
This is total BS and redherring!
There's no HIV virus or disease!
Read Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos - biophysicist (Perth group).
Ps. Read also Peter Duesberg, whose career was destroyed over this.
The film I had in mind is called House of numbers. Watch it on Odysee.
For a more layman documentation read the amazing Celia Farber.
You are welcome :)
3+ years ago
A Huge Number of Medical Doctors Ask for a Reassessment of the Corona Measures
https://www.globalresearch.ca/medical-doctors-ask-reassessment-corona-measures
So many people have jumped onto the Covid analysis bandwagon. So many words! But I always come back to Luc Montagnier, Mike Yeardon and Bhakti and Stephanie Seneff. And one short article by Professor Fraser. And recently I’ll add Professor Dagleish to that list. Clear, short, commonsense and they don’t ‘blind you with the science’. And for historical perspective read Dr Mary’s Monkey, which I was told about in 2015.
/Montaigner/Montagnier/
>At this point, I haven’t seen anything that says to me that Pfizer or Bill Gates or Harari or Klaus Schwab or Tedros or any of the others envisioned, or the senior scientists at the vaccine research center, envisioned that this would be a lethal bioweapon and I frankly object to that language that’s often bandied about without any clear evidence to support it other than inference
They maimed and killed all the animals in the two decades of trials leading up to the rollout, Bob.
That's democide. A crime against humanity. The people who developed and rolled out these bioweapons need to hang.
How's that for some 'language' Bob?
Edit: Thank you Sasha, for the devastating take down of this nonsense above from Bob. Give me a break!
Hello ExcessDeathsAU: Your comment is spot on. I'm not a biological "expert" in any sense of the term, but it only took me one three hour tour back in 2020 to find evidence of massive biological harm due to mRNA "testing". I agree that ALL perpetrators need to hang. Mr. Malone should be stationed at the back of the line, so he can contemplate his turn...Thanks for posting.
I genuinely laughed out loud at your last sentence - thanks Paul.
Absolutely agree on all counts. All it took was a bit of curiosity to see what was being injected, and as for the 'doctors' in the medical centres? I have nothing but contempt for them. All the papers were there, are still there, and if they did not look, line them up (as you say). And if they did look? Get in line just as well.
Smartest guy I know is my handyman. When they proposed this in early 2020 he looked at me and said "it's going to kill tens of millions and they will start a giant war to cover it up." He should really be writing a Substack.
Glad you enjoyed my suggestion. I have more respect for the average handyman and tinker than any alleged doctor. At least a good handyman knows how to fix things without breaking them...
We tradesmen have time to think while we work. Also time to listen to Alex Jones, who is unfortunately right about a lot of stuff.
BILL CLINTON IS A RAPIST
Bob
I wrote a story on Your Local Epidemiologist, who is a menace and is not going to stop until she gets even more censorship and control. I note that she has more than 20,000 paid subscribers and more than 211,000 total subscribers. If Jessica Rose is right, you are the ONLY "Covid skeptic" who ranks in the Top 30 Substack authors in the "Science" category. That is bizarre as Covid skeptics actually put Substack on the map.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/dear-lord-protect-us-from-our-local?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
YLE is a fake - it is a CDC marketing department, funded by federal dollars laundered through 20K fake social media profiles. Katelyn was a CDC employee and now a "consultant", lol. There are no 20K morons who want to pay actual money to read CDC propaganda which is available for free on that stack and on every mass media. I generally believe in stupidity, but YLE stretches my beliefs too much.
And the scary part is Substack's founders and PR folks keep promoting the site. They did a big feature story on her that all Substack authors got. I bet Substack has never contacted you and asked if they could profile your Substack success story.
It's important that those who go against the olde world take on reality- like Sasha- can write freely without censorship. Junk sites are probably more to do with hooking in junk minds who will eventually stumble across some searing realities - Ss being its own highly functioning ecosystem. She may not be promoted the same way, but timing is everything.
Imho Substack is a time bomb that will go off when they mean it to, the same way Facebook did, but for different reasons.
Your comments are consistently excellent, thanks.
You do recall Bill I assume when an offer was made for existing SubStack authors to invest in the effort? You must have gotten a message to said effect. I did, and I believe you have been posting as an Author longer than I have, so presumably it was sent to all. Well, I thought about it, decided not to seek council from my significant other, and just like at Vegas - I put some funds into it for the fun of it. Bottom line though is I have records of all of this, and the fees paid, which were not trivial, and I have standing above and beyond just being an Author as well.
Ken
I remember that. Stay tuned to my site for future articles on a "Plan B" if Substack is effectively captured. I also think from my big subscription drive that 99 percent of Substack authors can't make a real living from this model. I think the Powers that Be are going to wait out many authors who will give up their "Independent" journalism.
My life depends on people not complying with what is coming so I would be interested.
Well - I'm fortunate in a way - I don't need SubStack to make a living.
I'm not in that group. I had some savings - stocks I could sell - to subsidize me in my first year - those are about gone. I think 1 percent of 1 percent of Substack authors can make, say, $40,000 year from doing this. Most of the key writers have other incomes from spouses or savings and don't need to depend on Substack exclusively to pay the bills.
It's a big issue I tried to highlight in my Big Subscription Drive (which you helped make a pretty good success!).
Bill - there will still be those who aren't seeking to be 'independent journalists', they just want to put their pound of flesh out there for people to read.
If you want to make money from the internet, the marketing is far more important than what you write. Sadly. After all, if 80% of the people are credulous, ignorant and not scientifically trained, there will be significant subpopulations who believe all kinds of nonsense.
If you look at climate alarmism and equally charlatan-esque writers who predict 'devilishly cold winters' year after year without being called out as frauds, you will find the exact comparator to Covidian sheep and 'viruses don't exist' false binaries.
Well as an angel investor in Substack, this rubs me the wrong way.
OK, I admit, I'm maybe not an "angel" investor, and in fact, being I was not certified to be an "investor" in said instruments, my investment was limited to $2200 I think, but I made an investment, so I have standing to inquire about some decisions being made.
You want to argue that?
I have standing.
Now - I just need to figure out the status of said investment, cause the info has been essentially nothing but silence and I'm wondering - what happened to those funds?
Jessica Rose speculates it might not be Substack per se that's changing things. Who has access to the computer servers or the companies that process the payments?
It's never made sense to me "they" would go so hard after social media companies and completely ignore Substack, which is growing rapidly and is full of brilliant contrarians.
They might have been content to leave it alone for a while (let us all vent here), but once this speech platform started, say, making more people "vaccine hesitant" - they couldn't let that stand. They also left Tucker Carlson alone for years ... until they went after him.
At some point, they "got to" Matt Drudge and probably bought him out. They got James O'Keefe. They damn sure got Julian Assange. They got the J-6 insurrectionists and sent would -be revolutionaries a message they couldn't miss.
To me, it seems inevitable they'll come after Substack (and might already be doing this). They are just getting started on the most important parts of their unfinished agendas. For example, they can't have Substack authors railing against central bank digital currency or the next phase of Climate Change or that WHO "treaty."
I hope I'm wrong and Substack doesn't "go wobbly." In the meantime ... post while you still can.
I think Substack is a corral for a particular breed of livestock. It just takes awhile to get them all safely inside. The gate will slam shut.
I am being messed with here primarily I'm guessing because I speak of God and Jesus often and that is verboten.
Yes, I have spoken of this as well - it's a Hundred Flowers operation, similar to the Twitter blue ticks. Ditto to the God/Jesus. I go hard in that aspect and get a phenomenal amount of abuse.
I take it day-by-day, and I've read the terms. Here they are for today: 111523 1221
https://substack.com/tos
Of particular interest to me as an Author is the following:
~
First and foremost, you own what you create. Any original content you post, upload, share, store, or otherwise provide to Substack remains yours and is protected by copyright and any other applicable intellectual property laws.
Let em have it Sasha. Both barrels.
mathew aldred crunched some numbers on her. amusing https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/substack-promotes-katelyn-jetelina
pretty stunning photorealism above, btw :)
haha I'm glad you posted this to Sasha's SS. She loves having a go at YLE and I love to see it.
Eric Coppolino and Dr. Tenpenny are also in there.
As someone who began writing about the plandemic here in November of 2020 (and getting chastised by Substack for doing so), I agree with your last sentence. I don't know of anyone else who was covering these topics here back then. But within a year that changed dramatically.
" 20,000 paid subscribers " Plus $$$ money $$$ from Big Pharma too, maybe ?
An annual paid sub for her is $50 ($60 for those who opt to pay $6/month). If 10 percent of her (allegedly) 211,000 subscribers are paid ... that's 21,100 paid subscribers and at least $1 million in gross revenue. And, as my article points out, she's in demand on the speaking and Disinformation Gala circuit, where I'm sure she's being paid.
By way of comparison, I have 216 paid subscribers. My take-away: her version of the truth sells a lot better than my version.
I also know that most Substack authors only have 2 to 4 percent as their "paid" subscriber ratio. How did she get to 10 percent?
That is scary.
Does that mean there are more percentage % of people who are and will be dying from the jab in America?
Maybe that is why there are 11 million walk-in migrants to replace us?
Good question. Last time I checked, with 4% of the worlds population we had 15% of the worlds covid deaths. If we assume, as we are being told, that many if not most of those deaths are due to the jabs, then it seems we can safely say that yes, a large percentage are and will be dying here in the US. Ed Dowds numbers bear this out.
But this isn't a "story."
How much evidence do we need that every important organization is captured?
Right now it appears that hard evidence cannot compete with bought and paid for propaganda.
I'm reminded of Mark Twains insightful comment that "It's easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled".
We all know it IS a story. Maybe we just need to keep plugging away until we turn the tide.
And as one of my readers asked, what the heck are those paid subscribers actually paying for or why? They could get the exact same propaganda from 200 MSM sites and every world official ... for free.
big pharma, US and Israeli military troops and funding. A surprising portion of the Israeli population are paid commenters on targeted alternative media.
Social media combined with university and MIC connections.
Bill those are all bot subscriptions. it's a truth ministry money laundering operation. probably goes to the democratic party just like all that ukraine money
Ha, ha.
Must be?
They all knew. They just didn't care, and they still don't. Maiming and murdering humanity pays too well for them to EVER stop what they're doing. It's up to us to make sure that murdering and maiming people for a living is too dangerous a profession to be worth the $.
People who murder and maim others for a living need to start enjoying the life expectancy of a housefly at a large family party with ten swatters per square foot. Since when did we accept this new "rule" that they may murder us with impunity, but we're not allowed to fight back? Our courts will not permit a CIVIL remedy. Our elections are fully RIGGED so there is no remedy there. Are they ALL absolutely CERTAIN they prefer the alternative to a CIVIL remedy?
Heh, heh... I like the fly swatter idea, but I'm more into three foot crowbars...
Public executions for these demonic murderers would be best.
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn wrote in the Gulag Archipelago :
"Here is a riddle not for us contemporaries to figure out: Why is Germany allowed to punish the evildoers and Russia is not? What kind of disastrous path lies ahead of us if we do not have the chance to purge ourselves of the putrefaction rotting inside our body? What, then can Russia teach the World?
By an unexpected turn of our history, a bit of the truth, an insignificant part of the whole, was allowed out in the open. But those same hands which once screwed tight our handcuffs now hold their palms out for reconciliation: "No, Don't dig up the past! Dwell on the past and you'll loose an eye" But the proverb goes on to say: 'Forget the past any you'll lose both eyes'"
It would seem that our inability/failure to hold government employees, the military, scientist, members of the Public Health, influencers NGO, NPO and others for their Covid crimes - stems in part from our failure to hold them and others for past crimes. Such a list would include HIV, Lyme Disease, SV-40, vaccine lies, sterility programs, corruption of the education system, instigation of Ukraine wars, 9-11, numerous false flags and so on. Our country is almost completely Blind
We, everyday citizens, must hold ourselves accountable first.
Example - When plastics were introduced, we knew they were harmful, but we allowed ourselves to be lulled by a lie called "recycling" which let us off the hook in a multitude of ways as long as we bought the lie by participating. "Recycling" even gave us an opportunity to virtue-signal our participation in the lies. We accepted the horrors of plastics because they were CONVENIENT. It's so much easier to rip open plastic then throw it away than it is to wash glass and cart it to a redemption center for actual real recycling and advantageous to the plastic makers who didn't want to spend money properly disposing of toxic petroleum by-products or recycle glass or ship glass, etc. Now we are polluted with toxic plastic in the innermost reaches of our bodies. Babies nurse it from their mother's breasts. Marine animals are dying of contamination. Plastic microparticles rain down from every square centimeter of sky on every square centimeter of the earth.
We are responsible. We have colluded with our perpetrators. We can't hold the perps responsible until we hold ourselves responsible. It's a simple math equation.
Why is anyone surprised we are still doing it? God help us. He's the only One who can.
Exactly this. We are convenienced into slavery on all fronts.
Look at all the awake ppl using every since Google products! In the beginning I have explained them in great detail the issue, I even provide them with excellent alternatives. Do they care? No. :(((
In my head I am like "go get vaxxed up, you are an enabler, no better than the rest".
As Satan tries to prove we are no better than animals and God is wrong to hold us in any regard, he uses the same techniques of control as are used to domesticate animals. Dogs, cattle, etc. Give an animal the basic necessities of life or even a little better than basic and they will follow you in servitude or to slaughter.
I beg to differ. The biblical story of three boys who stood instead of bowing to the king and were thrown into the furnace where they later emerged unscathed, just stood. They didn't try to get others around them to stand. Others tried to get the boys to bow like they were bowing because they thought the boys were idiots and fools and throwing their lives away. But the boys would not bow down. They simply stood by what they knew was right. They would bow to no man. King or no king. Only to God Himself.
At the end of this story who is the fool and who is the wiser? Who is loved and who is forgotten?
Keep going. God Bless.
Yes, the plastics nightmare is just about overwhelming to contemplate. Probably only solved when the Sun performs it's next micronova. It's about due and likely to occur within the next two decades. You can learn more about this from Ben Davidson and his YT channel "Suspicious Observers".
willfully blind it seems. I had to get over my cognitive dissonance, why don't the rest?
Commenting on the eye-opening Urso-Malone exchange (before finishing Sasha's entire post):
I cannot help remarking that Urso's acknowledgment of Malone’s claim that reasearch on bioweapons was so compartmentalized ("silo-ed" as Malone calls it) that only the top scientists could have been aware of the deadly intentions --and Malone’s eagerness to agree to that -- puts Malone in the odd position of inadvertently having to come to a realization that he's only able to continue to act as if he did not comprehend the evil intentions if he also admits he was NOT one of those "top scientists" able to make that determination.
I think that realization was what made Malone stammer through his last passage quoted here.
Lying is a difficult sport, requires too much gymnastic skills and in the age of internet I feel sad for the practitioners of it...
My Dad taught us (kids) that lies are complicated and burdensome. They will always be found out and the consequences will be far worse.
Yes. Their lies can be replayed and dissected like a dead frog in a biology class.
No rest for the wicked. Must be exhausting...
One of the best responses I've ever read with regard to how difficult it is to be a successful liar forever, especially in this day and age.
The internet never forgets.
Lying demands excellent memory - a particular kind of memory. Sooner or later they will contradict themselves and/or show inconsistencies in their "stories".
Tereza Coraggio has a long list of excellent observations about Malone.
Liars always find a justification for it. 'You can't handle the truth!' being the classic projection. I'm always amazed at how the 'successful' members of my family (successful in rising the greasy pole and earning shedloads) are completely incapable of facing up to basic truths, yet still claim that they have to be in control and have to tell me what to think (the classic being that 'only the Labour Party can save the country').
Lying is the sport for those that want to rise up the greasy pole in fields where lying is de rigeur. You know, like politics, diplomacy, working in the media.
The thing about the web, the web of lies and the web of the internet - the discerning mind can differentiate and then when the wave of retribution forms, it will be undeniable.
I'm pretty sure the wave has already formed.
I'm pretty sure many already know.
I'm pretty sure that I'm pretty sure I don't know for sure what will happen next, but I take solace and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in sentiment.
Ken - the internet was a great boon for those who were intellectually mature by the time it came around. You really don't want unlimited informational sources if your mind can't process its veracity easily and efficiently.
I wouldn't want to be born in the 21st century and constantly exposed to the internet. How on earth do you ground yourself with no ability to sift through that veritable deluge of conflicting information?
Yep. That is why it wouldn't bother me in the least if the whole thing went down and it is also why we got our kids out onto trails for real in the forest when they were young. Now they love hiking as much as me and the love of my life do.....imagine that!
Best to you Rhys J.
Ken
You and I have something in common, then, Ken. I spent my formative years in my 20s hiking most weekends, rock climbing as well, fell-running too. And I did it in the days when you couldn't alert mountain rescue with a mobile phone, you had to take responsibility to navigate and, if necessary, to retreat. I learned more of value in mountains than I did at University and it's proven its worth for a lifetime.
>Lying is a difficult sport, requires too much gymnastic skills and in the age of internet
Your wrong on this one. Orwell described what we would have pretty accurately.
> I feel sad for the practitioners of it...
Fuck them. Feel sorry for everyone else.
I agree with Sasha.
"Feeling sorry for" someone is not feeling compassion; it's feeling PITY.
The liars are PITIFUL, loathsome creatures undeserving of compassion.
Remember, your government wants you sick, dependent on big pharma, broke and then dead.
great article, a look at all the weak greedy, venal, morons who've traded their souls for a few greasy bucks pay working for the death machine - Hows that gonna go down with God at their Hell or Heaven interview ????
They'll get arrested, tried, found guilty & jailed for crimes against humanity once sanity returns to Earth, knowledge employed for pure evil is no excuse.
Always good to see that raptor Malone get called out, who's he suing this week???
'Malone, Steve Kirsch & other DoD spokesmen are running a distraction maneuver to keep attention away from the intentional toxicity of the biochemical weapons, the DoD/WHO control of the programs & the fact that “biodefense” is camouflage for straight-up State-sponsored biowarfare, conducted by bringing pharmaceutical companies into the military-industrial-Congressional complex, calling bioweapons “vaccines,” & terrifying ppl into taking them under “public health emergency” & “pandemic” narratives'.
Katherine Watt
God bless Dr Mike Yeadon who's been out front warning humanity right from the begining at great personal cost
Thank you Sasha for speaking out, I will never forget seeing your presentation where you revealed all the DOD jab contracts - it was one of those pivotal moments because your evidence banged them all to rights, there was no where for them to hide, you laid it out, so brave of you, I will never forget it, you singlehandedly murdered the lot of them with that presentation, no one really knew what was going on before then, but we do now, thanks to you & you just keep outting the criminals with your knowledge & insight - thank God
Keep slaying them & stay safe
Your work is much appreciated & valued
Amen. Thank God for the courageous.
I absolutely second that 👍
Do you have the link to Katherine Watt’s note or article where she states what you quoted? Pls post. Ty 🙏
It's from a post of hers from 28th October 2023 titled
Whatever is in the biochemical weapons bearing Pfizer and other pharma labels, is there because US SecDefs and their WHO-BIS handlers ordered it to be there
If you go to her substack it's the 8th post down.
I posted that quote elsewhere & got a barrage of criticism off ppl who have no clue who is really who & who is behind them, their deep state handlers.
If Ms Watt says it true, then I believe her 100%, she knows what's going on in a manner most of us don't
Thanks for replying. I will look it up and read it. Highly recommend her recent interview with a English Podcaster. I was moved by Katherine’s emotion about the failure of many lawyers to take action against this evil.
Yes, that was with my friend, James Delingpole.
James and I didn’t know one another before the nonsense.
Turns out we were both normies without faith.
Now we’re way down the rabbit hole and have regained faith.
There’s nothing James won’t unearth!
Good to know this little bit of background. Thanks for sharing, Mike! It makes me appreciate the interview & James even more. I shall look forward to watching more of his work.
James had a very natural, extraordinary way of making Katherine laugh in a manner that I’ve not seen before in any other interview. Something about his sensitivity & almost self-deprecating kind of humor helped bring out Katherine’s tender honesty & emotions regarding the plandemic - the separation & isolation it has caused her to experience with friends and associates; the lack of interest of attorneys in addressing the DOD connections based on her research; .& the incomprehensible evil that is arrayed against humanity. It was a very poignant & at moments raw exchange between two concerned individuals.
You, Katherine, Sasha, and so many others who are the frontliners or steely “prophets” of Truth have had to bear a heavy burden. Though I knew this in my heart and in an intellectual sense, the interview with Katherine made me FEEL your burdens. It was a deeply visceral understanding which moved my Spirit. I HEAR YOUR CRIES IN THE WILDERNESS!
How could anyone not do their part to help further the work you all have done & are still doing? No, I don’t have the capacity to reach hundreds and thousands as you frontliners but I do what I can at every opportunity to speak with people and spread the Truths that have come to Light. I haven’t been sleeping very much as I read and view, respectively, as many articles/videos as I can. I try to be up-to-date and informed as to the latest for, as you know, new revelations (eg. DNA Plasmids, SV-40, “hidden” gene, etc.) create an ever changing landscape.
I would be remiss for not joining in the trenches in this WAR of wars. Thus, every day I plant seeds wherever I can.
How interesting that you, James, & Katherine all experienced an about face in your spirituality. Katherine has spoken about having turned aside from her faith for many years. Yet looking into the dark soul of “the Monster” brought her back “Home” again. Surely, the same holds true for many others around the world who have “the eyes to see and the ears to hear” or, as you stated early on in an interview, the ability to connect the dots.
I have previously read the book of Isaiah but recently my eyes were drawn to the following chapter/verses which I’d like to share with you because it made me think of all the frontliner “prophets” who are putting their lives on the line to warn people of what’s happening and what is still to come:
12 You should not say, “It is a conspiracy,”
concerning all that this people calls a conspiracy,
neither fear their threats
nor be afraid of them.
13 Sanctify the Lord of Hosts Himself,
and let Him be your fear,
and let Him be your dread.
Isaiah (MEV)
Thank you so much Mike for all that you’ve done on behalf of Mankind. You do what you do because it’s the right thing to do. You ARE having an impact, but remember results are not so important as your motive. God may be closing the ears and hearts of people for a reason. He did the same with Pharaoh when Moses sought freedom for his people. Yet no matter, the work must continue.
May God protect you, keep you strong, and temper your faith like Damascus Steel.
Veronica E.
Thank you, Veronica, for your kind & well observed comments.
You know, I really find encouraging your closing remarks, that motive matters very much.
Best wishes
Mike
Have you tried him yet on 'the role of the SAS, MI6 et al in promoting genocides and global fascism worldwide?'
He had many sacred cows 15 years ago and they all came out when he was hating 'Liberal Democrats', which basically came down to him being a Brexiteer and the Libdems being pro-EU, whereas the Liberal Democrats became popular under Charlie Kennedy due to their principled stand against the Iraq war. I joined the Libdems for that reason, left with dignity when it became clear that I disagreed with them on climate change and the EU.
Usually, people projecting hatred onto others betray that they have major unresolved issues in their psyche.
Hopefully, he's resolved his desire for extreme financial inequality to represent 'humanity'. He's never experienced extreme poverty in his life and I guarantee you that he wouldn't be able to cope with it. Having been born into a family that could afford private education, he has no clue about the ennervating grind of poverty. I do - I experienced it doing a PhD on £2756 in the late 1980s.
It's something I'd like every right wing libertarian to experience to teach them quite how useless they are when all the trappings of middle class upbringings are removed from them.
No tailor made shirts, no replacement even of Marks and Spencers underwear: just keep wearing those clothes until they wear out and then keep on wearing them until your luck changes.
Experience 2 bouts of 14 days of flu in one winter for the only time in your life in the third year of poverty.
Delingpole wouldn't understand that, any more than the fascist Andrew Roberts would understand having his leg blown off in Afghanistan.
I will definitely look for that, I am a great admirer of her expertise, so thanks for bringing that to my attention 👍
Sasha, did you catch RM's performance at this week's hearing? He not only doubled-down on denying bad motive, but even lied under oath. He said that "about two years ago" he called for the jabs to be withdrawn "across the board even for the elderly." Any of us who were playing attention remember many instances of him advocating the jabs for the elderly throughout 2021, his refusal to recommend against the jab at the fall 2021 staged gathering with Hawaiian children, and his January 2022 letter in the Washington Times where he limited his Covid jab concerns to "healthy" children. He is now re-writing his own history via the congressional record.
Around 2:56 he states: "It's been the position of myself and the Physicians that I'm affiliated with physician Health Associates in the global Co Summit as of about two years ago that we believe that these products are neither safe nor effective and should be withdrawn across the board even for the elderly." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNkWEcctCpc
MTG has supported funding for Ukraine. It’s pretty likely that she supports funding for Israel. I feel her hearing was really a dog and pony show to allow controlled opposition actors like Robert Malone to cover his ass. Whereas we all thought she was a true patriot in the beginning she turned out to be a sellout. She’s a pretty deep idiot if she couldn’t figure out that all the money going to Ukraine was actually being laundered. Come on!
When you are lying to yourself like Malone is it's very easy to lie to others. And very sick.
It sounds like MTG is not that stupid. She made money from the stock trade (oil and defence ) just before the Ukraine war 'broke out '. She also owns mRNA and Remdesiver (ref to her financial disclosure report).
Or maybe she is psychic and can predict the future? :-P
You are very brave exposing this lot. I admire you.
Fair enough but please consider this.
If you’re concerned about what might happen if you speak out, consider what’s going to happen if you don’t.
Who says I am concerned? You have no idea how I have challenged the authorities during the last 3 years.
I was simply offering words of encouragement.
97 members of Congress illegally bought stock in pharma companies. https://patch.com/us/across-america/here-are-97-people-congress-questionable-stock-trades-nyt
Bill Cooper wrote about the JASON group in his book Behold A Pale Horse. He was suicided.
What is the JASON group?
Speak plain. He was murdered!
True story.
Reference, please. I have that book on my shelf and need to read it.
Sorry Tom - I gave the book away to a friend, but remember the group being listed, I believe in the beginning of the book?
I wouldn't quite call that confrontation "suicide by cop"!
What is the story? What happened to him?
Police (Arizona State or Showlow sheriff, I don't recall) came and shot him dead. Could probably look it up with a search engine. No more Hour of the Time!
Thank you! I don’t expect to get real answers on search engines. The things they really don’t want you to know get “disappeared”.
Thank you Sasha, for your the depth, breadth, and detail of your posts in general, and this one in particular.
Overwhelmed with the flood of information now available on substack and alternatives to mass media propaganda and big tech social media ... I've really struggled to find my way by framing universal truths of human nature.
One of those truths is that similar to the way in which we tend to be constrained by our own temperament and social circumstances, we also tend to be constrained by a somewhat parochial view of history. The myth of collective moral progress tends to steer us into smugly presuming that we live in a 'modern' era, qualitatively different from more barbaric times.
When I think of all the historic examples of man's ruthless inhumanity to man — those who profited from the suffering of others for their own self-indulgence or amusement, and if justified at all, with a glib 'for the common good' — it chills me to realize that same quality and quantity of sociopathy has always been in our gene pool. A pro-active, ambitious, evil.
Those who rise to join the good fight, appear to be those who are awakened to the fact that we are not so much 'led' by those of good will, as 'herded' by predators. Those of genuine good will are not predisposed to fight fellow humans, and so we are perpetually engaged in a rearguard action, playing catch-up to those conspiracies of evil.
Thank you for your shield and armor in this forever war of mankind against its own worst nature.
Mr Martin - the lesson I've learned going through life is that there are times you must just absorb information like a sponge, without trying to process it immediately. Then a time comes when you must grapple with it to reach conclusions. My experience is that during that grappling phase, it's often best to withdraw initially, not to try and absorb any more. Then you draw up a hypothesis and you can return to the information sources with the intent of clarifying your hypothesis/modifying it in the light of new evidence.
One useful lesson I've had is that the more subjects you look into in depth, the more useful lessons you learn about patterns found throughout the world. You learn about how unquestioned dogmas arose, whether or not they are actually right and how those dogmas eventually get overturned.
As for being 'herded', it's more to do with projection of mental issues onto others - narcissists need admiration, whereas psychopaths need submission. Quite frankly, I've refused to submit to either and it doesn't do you much good.
I agree, overwhelmed by the volume and content of all of the information presented.
I have a logical argument to convince people who are not able to see the truth.
If it were presented the right way, might help at least some people. Maybe I could word it better…??? Any suggestions?
My inability to consider your viewpoint will end in embarrassment for me.
Your inability to consider my viewpoint will end in the enslavement of humanity.
PS I once shared your views.
Another thing,
Everyone who tests positive for Covid is being given Paxlovid by their doctor. This medication is dangerous and has a black box warning on it. So people aren’t getting the vax, but many are getting Paxlovid. What is this doing to public health? It can’t be good.
and how are those tests being conducted? what is the false positive rate? They should be taking ivermectin and vitamins.....
Given the prevalence of previous infections and the vaccines, my guess would be a high false positive rate. Add asymptomatic infections that are also being prescribed Paxlovid, and this is another scandal that is not getting the attention and alternative press that it should be getting IMO. Given the dearth of vaccine uptake at present, unfettered Paxlovid prescriptions could be the bigger extant public health crisis. Just an opinion. I do not have any data.
Malone really let the mask slip there. I was smiling as I imagined the pressure he is under as the plasmid and SV40 stories are becoming widely known. Imagine having to try and square that circle!
You'd have to assert things like:
They 'unintentionally and with the best of intentions' deleted the SV40 sequence labeling on the plasmid before submitting it to regulatory agencies...
They faked efficacy by insisting on a 2 week window because in their heart they just knew the vaccines were good for you even if they had to fake the evidence of efficacy...
Every drug company chose the spike protein serendipitously as the target antigen for their vaccines despite it being the most potentially dangerous and certainly the most supicious part of sars-cov-2...
They omited the genotoxicity studies (Malone got his notoreity by pointing this out in the Dark Horse podcast) out of their overwhelming concern for saving humanity fromt he scourge of covid...
They fought hard in court to bury the pfizer fake trial and approval docs for 75 years because they just didn't want people to misinterpret them and fuel silly vaccine hesitancy...
It was a new thing called 'mild' myocarditis because if you worry about the heart damage they gave you, you might die of a heart attack!
I can't go on. I'm glad I don't have Malone's job.
If it was just compartmentalised error , it would’ve been stopped by now. It patently ridiculous to use that argument now.
Dr Malone looks and smells like CIA to me, no way he got jabbed
See the comment I made above regarding Robert Malone and the CIA. Sorry, I don’t have the link for the interview but you can research and find it.
Yes, he did.