242 Comments

Seems to me that a good lawyer would have little problem arguing that premeditation of actions occurred to trigger the 'partnership' between DOD and HHS, since only through premeditation would they conclude that such a partnership was necessary to over-ride limitations of powers of individual Depts/Agencies. Only through reaching that conclusion would they effect a never-before-entered-into partnership aimed at mass injection of the US people with ill-defined, untested concoctions.

Once premeditation of actions is proven, all possibility of plausible deniability is lost for the senior conspirators.

It's still possible to conclude that the entirety of the Senate and Congress were intellectually incapable/unwilling to do their mandated duties to oversee Executive activities in order to protect the lives, health and prosperity of those they are mandated to serve. That of course would in normal employment be an instant dismissal offence. In fact, it's entirely reasonable to argue that Congress and the Senate is no longer allowed to govern as they have committed what would be capital crimes if they were aware of what they were doing and still would represent widespread manslaughter if they didn't.

But further evidence would be needed to identify co-conspirators within the Senatorial/Congressional ranks who were tasked with bringing all Public Representatives into line to collude unwittingly in treason against the American People.

Do such co-conspirators exist and who has the evidence to prove it??

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

I think not only did defence help to develop the killer jab, they also helped to fix up a virus that could cause a panic attack. I think the virus was not ready when released, that it was an accidental too early release. The virus spread very quickly but was not deadly enough, but since it escaped, they took the opportunity and once the panic train was rolling, it went quite well. Unfortunately for them, quite a few people in the world realized soon that something was off. I smelled a rat in early March, reading an article from I think South Korea. Then I found Berenson, and then all of you. What a luck ! I thought I was going nuts, but it was the rest of the world going nuts.

Expand full comment
Jan 19·edited Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

These laws are diabolically clever, "or a disease or condition that may be attributable to such agent or agents."

"May be" attributable is language that can be stretched infinitely considering that we're funding in foreign labs experiments with so many potentially disease causing agents. This "may be attributable" means you can't go back and accuse them of knowledge that it was indeed their own bioweapon since they can just say that it was plausible enough suspicion to issue an emergency declaration.

Remember that due to bribed CIA agents and a clandestine Fauci visit, the official foreign intelligence position was that it was a zoonotic event; but, nevertheless, they can simply say the potential existed that it was a biowarfare agent.

They can claim that for anything! Who with any sort of honest intention would write the law with such loose language as to the credibility of the threat? It is not believable that it was written for actual emergencies with such permissive language. Laws are crafted with special care to these phrases. The point here is to allow the HHS secretary to color the situation with a plausible story premised on the belief of biowarfare attack despite a lack of evidence. It is a blank check law with language that only appears to create a condition for its use.

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Words matter, but in the case of EUA law every comma is intended to shield gov't from liability for their wrongdoing. Therefore I don't see in the EUA wording any admission by gov't that there was no virus (natural or engineered) because the phrase "biological agent" can certainly refer to such infections. I am always moved by the altruism and sincerity of the research done and stratagems suggested by you and KW. Your posts and KWs show an abiding faith and optimism that constitutional principles will triumph once the legal deceptions are revealed. Even if our optimism is disappointed, your work has had the important effect of waking up many people to what is no longer deniable. That a government infested with scoundrels is working overtime to harm us. Awareness and a willingness to stand up and do right can succeed where laws fail.

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

“One Government Entity” means Conspiracy and should be prosecuted under RICO.

Expand full comment

Sasha...please keep going.

"veeee penetrate zeeee Cabinets"

Expand full comment

Because Government is one big racket?

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Good Work Sasha!

The first two paragraphs raise a number of questions that I did not previously prioritize.

Recently, however I learned that Mme Birx was very active in effectively supervising Covid Task force. (Pence or no Pence)

This leads me to a one word response to said questions: BIOWEAPONS

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Excellent sleuthing as usual Sasha. However, this assumes the presumption of a prosecution. I wish I could be that positive.

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Various US agencies were involved as we know and witnessed, in the proliferation of this Plandemic propaganda, for decades prior to the SARSCovid2…/Bioweapon implementation. This has to be investigated by Non-Government folks.

Here… https://wjla.com/news/local/cdc-shut-down-army-germ-lab-health-concerns…..in Summer 2019, just before the Wet Market/Wuhan Lab leak/blame China lie after we collaborated and funded off shore Bioweaponry, as Ebola (with a 90% fatality rate) was played with in Fort Detrick CIA Bioweapons lab in Maryland, the CDC stepped in to close down the place for a “Decontamination Area Leak”.

This is too close to the Covid unveiling to not believe it was an alternate lie, should the Wuhan ‘Leak’ theory not be accepted by the muddled Government- Assaulted American citizenry.

Legal terms come up for me, like Substantive and Preponderance of Evidence.

Anyone else have teeth grinding anger?

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

So Javier Becerra is basically king of the USA at this point? The same clown who protected the scheming Awan Bros (whatever the fuck they really were) who stole money and information directly from Congress (DNC) and had a bunch of petty scams running in the NOVA circa mid 2000s.

Wonderful...

Expand full comment
founding

Hi Sasha - please see two minute ‘JPEO-CBRN Defense’ video from 2019 on plans for a “Medical Rapid Response” clearly showing partnership between DOD and HHS for medical countermeasures and the framework for “Rapid Response Partnerships” involving government, industry and academia. The video draws attention to "advances in regulatory science"!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPuxQ2o7Aog

Substack post here (your work cited) has links to ‘JPEO-CBRND’ site, with diagram for “Whole of Government Support to Covid-19” for OWS showing transition of Covid Response from DoD to HHS in late 2023.

https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/the-great-preset-and-the-biodefense

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Thanks again, Sasha, for taking the time to both summarize and organize the timelines of the scheme. This will be a very helpful share to normies just poking their head under the tent. Grazi

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Both of her articles (Part 1 and Part 2) are excellent and I coincidentally shared both of them on my substack today. Great minds think alike. LOL LOL

Expand full comment
Jan 19·edited Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

Sasha thanks for angels & demons. just found my new screensaver

KW proposal to move for summary judgment might have more wheels than we think, especially as circumstances grow more dire.

Expand full comment
Jan 19·edited Jan 19Liked by Sasha Latypova

A good end or an evil end never justifies an evil means to arrive there.

These secretaries hate the homeland.

________________

Colossians 3:17

All whatsoever you do in word or in work, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.

https://biblehub.com/colossians/3-17.htm

Expand full comment