In this post, I am going to point to similarities in experimental observations of Kozyrev and Pollak, working in seemingly different areas of science (astrophysics and water, respectively) and many decades apart.
Great post, Sasha... Light is important here, too. All living cells emit biophotons that are coherent (think about that one!). All of these things - water, light, gravity, time work in harmony/synchrony to create life and reality that we experience in ways that we still do not understand... Wonderfully and fearfully made.
Fascinating discourse Sasha. I had occasion recently to counsel a friend who has become increasingly agitated, and somewhat distracted, over the apparent freedom the cartel miscreants have taken in abusing the truth with impunity these days. He reportedly was feeling much better after we enjoyed an animated conversation about light and water, and added sound, with both of us sensing that full comprehension of the depth of what we were discussing was still beyond our current reach. Both of us know innately the connection of these physical elements to Creation, God's design, yet we are simply unable to fully articulate those precepts in detail... at this time. I sense some very important dots are being connected by your work Sasha. Thank you.
Nikolai A. Kozyrev - interesting. What we know is:
Gen 1:14 Then God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth"; and it was so. 16 And God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.
I wonder if there were significant differences between distilled and fluoridated water. Or better yet, swamp water with a lot of decayed organic matter.
There is much in science that has yet to be discovered. For example I always assumed that the heart pushes the blood through the body but wondered how it got through those microscopic capillaries. A midwestern doctor on substack pointed out that capillary blood flow is done by positive and negative charges locally. I think this is news to many of us who thought conventionally that liquids required a conventional pump to move liquids. Science is not a static "we already know everything" field of study. It is constantly being updated as it should.
Not 'in science' but yet to be scientifically uncovered - for reality is already the case but our models often conceal more than they reveal.
The nature of reality can be 'modelled' in theory, math and metaphor but only by excluding or discarding Infinity.
Closed system 'thinking' is unsurprisingly replicated in our 'death cult' of war by any and all means to gain control over resources and thus over rivals - predicated on 'survival of the 'fittest' though that really should be fitting for integrality or wholeness and not a technologised extension of Cain over Abel.
Science simply meant 'knowledge' but the investment in science has strings attached - that effectively marketise and weaponise 'knowledge' and thus abort the renewal you assume - but which is not what is happening when models are generated or extended as frameworks for technological—and psychological application.
An economically structured system of 'incentives' has developed to orchestrate social controls. System stability or 'resilience' is too big to fail and so everything else must sacrifice - including scientific discovery.
Pollack demonstrates flow through a hollow Nafion tube without any other energy source than the generation of EZ water at the interface of hydrophilic matter (Nafion) - which holds a negatively charge relative to its boundary condition. Increasing NIR exposure increases the flow - just as with the blood.
I don't see charge separation as disequilibrium but as a flowing or balanced disequilibrium - the idea of a static universe represented the heat death model - which arose from a thermodynamic framing of (physical) existence in which 'time is running out'
Plasma physics holds a deeper embrace of all that we thought we knew.
Physics as a discipline suffers a communication breakdown, which allows thescience™ of 'politically' corrupted mind-framing to invent or project models as investment scams running within 'politically protected narratives'.
With only a few minor caveats I found Bohm & Peats' "Science Order and Creativity" offers a good overview of the breakdown and limits or liabilities of science - prior to the much greater reveals of scientific corruption (not persons so much as principles) that have unfolded since it was written.
If a fake or masking 'solution' becomes foundational - all that is built from it is corrupted. This is why toxic debt conflicts cant just be pulled out and cancelled but that the whole structure collapses. The mind protects its investment as its self.
I write in part because you sparked a response - but it is to the thread of a shared attention.
Hello Binra. Interesting comment. I think Time is fluid, and we're embraced in that fluid. It is amusing that man attempts to analyse infinity with numbers... Infinity laughs silently, then provides whatever illusions we've constructed.
And yet in the guise of a symbolic or mythological consciousness we have the experience of the finite as bounded in time and place.
Yet know not what anything Is - apart from a frame of ultimately circular references.
This snip from my reading of A Course in Miracles today:
"The world of time is the world of illusion. What happened
long ago seems to be happening now. Choices made long since
appear to be open; yet to be made. What has been learned and
understood and long ago passed by is looked upon as a new
thought, a fresh idea, a different approach. Because your will is free you can accept what has already happened at any time you choose, and only then will you realize that it was always there. As the course emphasizes, you are not free to choose the curriculum, or even the form in which you will learn it. You are free, however, to decide when you want to learn it. And as you accept it, it is already
learned.
Time really, then, goes backward to an instant so ancient
that it is beyond all memory and past even the possibility of
remembering. Yet because it is an instant that is relived again and
again and still again, it seems to be now."
~ Manual for Teachers (ACIM)
We assume time to be linear because that is what we use it for —namely a continuity of self and world that runs as a collective agreement.
Infinity is also a term of Eternity. I lean to holding that the original 'atom' ideas relates to Infinity points or 'adamantine' particles - which cannot be understood apart from the love that aligns them.
The idea that water as a medium of Communication - or informing energy exchange offers a bridge to recognising love as Prime Creative - along with blocked Communication as a generator of 'noise' or dissonance that can be framed as guilt, Self-judgement and a split mind - along with a 'love' made from fear - as in the Stockholm syndrome.
To your Cosmic Laughter - A Course in Miracles offers a parable for how the Separation (Fall) occurred: (As a breakdown in Communication):
"Into eternity, where all is one, there crept a tiny, mad idea, at
which the Son of God remembered not to laugh. In his forgetting
did the thought become a serious idea, and possible of both accomplishment and real effects."
This is another way of saying we learned to discard Infinity to grow a focus of specific particularity as a consciousness through which to unfold experience (and consciousness).
'Laughing With' has a loose belly. But I don't see mockery as a primary expression of life. Let there be a 'divine place' within All That We Are from which we may laugh away what once gripped our heart in terror?
If Sasha feels I ramble overmuch here - I can put a snip with a link to the remainder on an old blog. As an intuitive I seek and see pathways of integration. Water as an interfacial medium of Consciousness and in-Form-ing stands upstream to the 'genetic control model'. No proteins operate without the medium of the message.
So ... Genesis 1:14-18 clearly identifies both a shared purpose & positioning for the sun & moon. They are the very first, and I might add, most accurate metrics of time we have. And since time was given as an ongoing process for restoring the earth back to the Creator, it makes perfect sense to expect renewed understanding of these complex arrangements, as time expires.
This is why the Apostle Paul writes about "the fulness of times" (meaning "completion") at Ephesians 1:10, a trajectory of-sorts.
Can't wait for our next "written college lecture", if i may humor the audience. (i have my own theory where this might be going, or actually 2 different theories.) 💖
tldr: simon shnoll was a russian scientist who discovered that the results of experiments across many different fields of science varied consistently according to geolocation. he never found a satisfactory cause, theorizing that planetary motion may have been involved
Sasha, these astronomy posts are very interesting! Can't wait for more. I'm always trying to put these observations into relation with Wilhelm Reich's theory of cosmic life energy, because I'm sure that he, too, was into something similar that traditional physics cannot explain.
I would very much recommend looking into the work of Paolo and Andrea Correa on aetherometry.com. They have replicated many of Reich’s experiments and have developed fairly comprehensive theories based on a more developed understanding of what Reich was studying.
Merci. I did not study the infinitesimal but I am convinced that things are happening there that can be influence by internal and exterior 'factors/forces'.
About the universe, if we consider that nothing could appear out of nothing, it would mean that everything has always been?
About time, if we had no memory, we could only observe what is happening in the present moment, then no sense of time?
'Things' are happening because the conditions permit? In an eternal and infinite 'universe'?
Great post, Sasha... Light is important here, too. All living cells emit biophotons that are coherent (think about that one!). All of these things - water, light, gravity, time work in harmony/synchrony to create life and reality that we experience in ways that we still do not understand... Wonderfully and fearfully made.
Fascinating discourse Sasha. I had occasion recently to counsel a friend who has become increasingly agitated, and somewhat distracted, over the apparent freedom the cartel miscreants have taken in abusing the truth with impunity these days. He reportedly was feeling much better after we enjoyed an animated conversation about light and water, and added sound, with both of us sensing that full comprehension of the depth of what we were discussing was still beyond our current reach. Both of us know innately the connection of these physical elements to Creation, God's design, yet we are simply unable to fully articulate those precepts in detail... at this time. I sense some very important dots are being connected by your work Sasha. Thank you.
Nikolai A. Kozyrev - interesting. What we know is:
Gen 1:14 Then God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth"; and it was so. 16 And God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.
I wonder if there were significant differences between distilled and fluoridated water. Or better yet, swamp water with a lot of decayed organic matter.
There is much in science that has yet to be discovered. For example I always assumed that the heart pushes the blood through the body but wondered how it got through those microscopic capillaries. A midwestern doctor on substack pointed out that capillary blood flow is done by positive and negative charges locally. I think this is news to many of us who thought conventionally that liquids required a conventional pump to move liquids. Science is not a static "we already know everything" field of study. It is constantly being updated as it should.
Not 'in science' but yet to be scientifically uncovered - for reality is already the case but our models often conceal more than they reveal.
The nature of reality can be 'modelled' in theory, math and metaphor but only by excluding or discarding Infinity.
Closed system 'thinking' is unsurprisingly replicated in our 'death cult' of war by any and all means to gain control over resources and thus over rivals - predicated on 'survival of the 'fittest' though that really should be fitting for integrality or wholeness and not a technologised extension of Cain over Abel.
Science simply meant 'knowledge' but the investment in science has strings attached - that effectively marketise and weaponise 'knowledge' and thus abort the renewal you assume - but which is not what is happening when models are generated or extended as frameworks for technological—and psychological application.
An economically structured system of 'incentives' has developed to orchestrate social controls. System stability or 'resilience' is too big to fail and so everything else must sacrifice - including scientific discovery.
Pollack demonstrates flow through a hollow Nafion tube without any other energy source than the generation of EZ water at the interface of hydrophilic matter (Nafion) - which holds a negatively charge relative to its boundary condition. Increasing NIR exposure increases the flow - just as with the blood.
I don't see charge separation as disequilibrium but as a flowing or balanced disequilibrium - the idea of a static universe represented the heat death model - which arose from a thermodynamic framing of (physical) existence in which 'time is running out'
Plasma physics holds a deeper embrace of all that we thought we knew.
Physics as a discipline suffers a communication breakdown, which allows thescience™ of 'politically' corrupted mind-framing to invent or project models as investment scams running within 'politically protected narratives'.
With only a few minor caveats I found Bohm & Peats' "Science Order and Creativity" offers a good overview of the breakdown and limits or liabilities of science - prior to the much greater reveals of scientific corruption (not persons so much as principles) that have unfolded since it was written.
If a fake or masking 'solution' becomes foundational - all that is built from it is corrupted. This is why toxic debt conflicts cant just be pulled out and cancelled but that the whole structure collapses. The mind protects its investment as its self.
I write in part because you sparked a response - but it is to the thread of a shared attention.
Hello Binra. Interesting comment. I think Time is fluid, and we're embraced in that fluid. It is amusing that man attempts to analyse infinity with numbers... Infinity laughs silently, then provides whatever illusions we've constructed.
Who can step outside Infinity to analyse it?
And yet in the guise of a symbolic or mythological consciousness we have the experience of the finite as bounded in time and place.
Yet know not what anything Is - apart from a frame of ultimately circular references.
This snip from my reading of A Course in Miracles today:
"The world of time is the world of illusion. What happened
long ago seems to be happening now. Choices made long since
appear to be open; yet to be made. What has been learned and
understood and long ago passed by is looked upon as a new
thought, a fresh idea, a different approach. Because your will is free you can accept what has already happened at any time you choose, and only then will you realize that it was always there. As the course emphasizes, you are not free to choose the curriculum, or even the form in which you will learn it. You are free, however, to decide when you want to learn it. And as you accept it, it is already
learned.
Time really, then, goes backward to an instant so ancient
that it is beyond all memory and past even the possibility of
remembering. Yet because it is an instant that is relived again and
again and still again, it seems to be now."
~ Manual for Teachers (ACIM)
We assume time to be linear because that is what we use it for —namely a continuity of self and world that runs as a collective agreement.
Infinity is also a term of Eternity. I lean to holding that the original 'atom' ideas relates to Infinity points or 'adamantine' particles - which cannot be understood apart from the love that aligns them.
The idea that water as a medium of Communication - or informing energy exchange offers a bridge to recognising love as Prime Creative - along with blocked Communication as a generator of 'noise' or dissonance that can be framed as guilt, Self-judgement and a split mind - along with a 'love' made from fear - as in the Stockholm syndrome.
To your Cosmic Laughter - A Course in Miracles offers a parable for how the Separation (Fall) occurred: (As a breakdown in Communication):
"Into eternity, where all is one, there crept a tiny, mad idea, at
which the Son of God remembered not to laugh. In his forgetting
did the thought become a serious idea, and possible of both accomplishment and real effects."
This is another way of saying we learned to discard Infinity to grow a focus of specific particularity as a consciousness through which to unfold experience (and consciousness).
'Laughing With' has a loose belly. But I don't see mockery as a primary expression of life. Let there be a 'divine place' within All That We Are from which we may laugh away what once gripped our heart in terror?
If Sasha feels I ramble overmuch here - I can put a snip with a link to the remainder on an old blog. As an intuitive I seek and see pathways of integration. Water as an interfacial medium of Consciousness and in-Form-ing stands upstream to the 'genetic control model'. No proteins operate without the medium of the message.
but faux-ci ...
Yes, and they teach faux-chi, or that's exactly what you were saying, in French and Italian!
So ... Genesis 1:14-18 clearly identifies both a shared purpose & positioning for the sun & moon. They are the very first, and I might add, most accurate metrics of time we have. And since time was given as an ongoing process for restoring the earth back to the Creator, it makes perfect sense to expect renewed understanding of these complex arrangements, as time expires.
This is why the Apostle Paul writes about "the fulness of times" (meaning "completion") at Ephesians 1:10, a trajectory of-sorts.
Incredible volumes of water constantly flow from waterfalls worldwide.
Science has never satisfactorily explained this.
Nelson’s work on solar system geometry affecting HF radio:
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230705231054/http://enterprisemissions.com/jnelson1.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230705231053/http://enterprisemissions.com/jnelson2.html
- Maurice Allais and Foucault pendulum during an eclipse: http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/the-physicist/the-physicist-historical/?lang=en
Everything we know is wrong.
Heh, heh... “If you think you know why you’re doing something - You’re probably wrong”
- Paul Vonharnish - (January 11, 2024)
Wow!
Excellent. I am looking forward to reading more. Thank you.
Love this article! Sasha so brainy!!
Can't wait for our next "written college lecture", if i may humor the audience. (i have my own theory where this might be going, or actually 2 different theories.) 💖
There is only infinite change, if anything!
larisa borisova preprint from nov 2024 on shnoll's experiments and the fractality of time. haven't finished reading but putting it out there for those interested https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386162930_Shnolls_Experiments_-_A_Demonstration_of_the_Fractality_of_Time
tldr: simon shnoll was a russian scientist who discovered that the results of experiments across many different fields of science varied consistently according to geolocation. he never found a satisfactory cause, theorizing that planetary motion may have been involved
Sasha, these astronomy posts are very interesting! Can't wait for more. I'm always trying to put these observations into relation with Wilhelm Reich's theory of cosmic life energy, because I'm sure that he, too, was into something similar that traditional physics cannot explain.
I would very much recommend looking into the work of Paolo and Andrea Correa on aetherometry.com. They have replicated many of Reich’s experiments and have developed fairly comprehensive theories based on a more developed understanding of what Reich was studying.
Merci. I did not study the infinitesimal but I am convinced that things are happening there that can be influence by internal and exterior 'factors/forces'.
About the universe, if we consider that nothing could appear out of nothing, it would mean that everything has always been?
About time, if we had no memory, we could only observe what is happening in the present moment, then no sense of time?
'Things' are happening because the conditions permit? In an eternal and infinite 'universe'?