Dosage is often all that separates poison from medicine. Thus the reason we have an FDA here in the US! I have heard that the EU signed contracts allowing a variation in purity between 50% and 85%. This means it was always impossible to know what was in any of the vials. No one would have agreed to this, meaning no one truly gave informed consent. That is criminal.
Dec 20, 2022·edited Dec 20, 2022Liked by Sasha Latypova
Listening now Sasha, about a half way through ... and though you are several pay grades ahead of me, you explain this in a way a very good high school student can understand. For the high-school student in us all, I am posting a round-about reference to your post to several Facebook groups. Thank you so much for pulling back the curtains on those perverse 'wizards of odds' ... and I am hoping you stay safe from any potential blow-back from the corporate nation-state.
Cheers from Japan,
steve
ps
45:00 ... 'Safer when it's broken?' ... Pretty good indication that the prototype is a bioweapon.
52:00 ... Guessing that placebos were used as stage-art-propaganda-nudging by those in the know, but not included in studies.
Hope this very important presentation of information is going to be used as evidence to show intent to harm. This one is going to be understood by the general public for sure, but I feel a lot of people are going to have a hard time coming to terms with what the countermeasures are really about.
Dec 20, 2022·edited Dec 21, 2022Liked by Sasha Latypova
Hi again Sasha,
I just finished a first listen ... and looking at the organizational charts hinting that the pre-existing institutional infrastructure was most likely responsible for making the prototypes, I could only sigh and come to the conclusion that 'glasnost' and 'perestoika' are fundamentally incompatible with scale. Inevitably, all institutions, especially at scale, appear to go through an evolution and decline. This process, at a smaller scale, was among my studies in educational psychology for game strategies in the building, functioning, and dissolution of task-based groups (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zolt%C3%A1n_D%C3%B6rnyei)
I am still reading A. Lobaczewski's 'Political Ponerology; The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of the Totalitarian State' ... and triangulating that with my intuition that Dunbar's number — an empathetic limit to the number of 'salient' (quantitatively problematic to say the least) relationships we can have (roughly between 150 and 250 people, and highly correlated with cross cultural replication studies) ... is also the limit of morality. Beyond small communities, compartmentalized 'need-to-know' information is not just a malicious, machiavellian act ... it necessarily replaces the immediacy and involvement of empathy-driven behavior because of the limits of human neural capacity (empathy, not just reason).
Among the take-aways from Lobaczewski are how sociopathic behaviors in the immediate family or community (running the gamut from purely genetic to trauma-induced morphological pathologies to transference from dysfunctional family relationships) are fractals of what happens at the scale of corporate nation-states.
But something else seeping into the picture, though not sure if it is from that book or elsewhere, is what I mentioned earlier ... how large organizations tend to drift towards a 'need-to-know' compartmentalization of information ... and it is fundamentally incompatible with empathy-driven behavior, moral autonomy, or an integrated world view.
At any rate ... the corruption you are exposing appears to be epiphenomenon of historically identifiable patterns of human nature, and the social sciences are going to either have to step up their game ... or as Laura Dodsworth's book, 'State of Fear' seems to suggest ... meritocraic institutions have already been reduced to credentialized, compartmentalized, corruption by those irredemable 'dark triads' drawn to concentrations of power.
We can chat about these things all day and night, and I can cross post and share with several 'private' Facebook groups ... but I suspect authoritative accountability will not come about through force of reason. We are accelerating into brutal times. Gary Sharpe's latest substack post is a good triangulation.
I am going to watch this at least a three or four times, the first couple of times for verification of what we've been gradually learning (and will come back to this comment to edit and add notes to myself and interested others), but the subsequent times (or more) for critical thinking / reasoning / presentation skills.
Fantastic work Sasha. I see your STEM chops as a perfect dove-tail for Margarette Anna Alice's more Liberal Arts approach to great critical thinking skills.
Thank you for this incredible information. I has been shared and I am considering more sharing. This is another incentive to action. What actions? Discussion is welcome. I myself have more than enough information and incentive to prioritize the analysis of "what actions", and I am astounded that very few are doing a full spectrum discussion and analysis of "what actions".
Dec 20, 2022·edited Dec 20, 2022Liked by Sasha Latypova
If I were to produce poisons to kill my enemies in an industrial setting, why would I bother to use expensive quality control protocols?
My conclusion since 2021 is that all of this was intentional.
I've never seen the same product in the past even produced in different countries, be so different in composition...
1. Some batches contain Aluminium (heavy metal) and other don't and in large concentrations (not a contaminant here!)
2. Some batches contain Ce-137 (radioactive - half life = 30years) and other don't and in large concentrations (not a contaminant here!)
3. Some batches have LNPs without MmRNA - Are these placebos being sold as quackcines???
4. Some batches have LNPs with partial MmRNA - which type of weird proteins do they produce? Not spikes for sure!
etc........
This is called crime against humanity. It has nothing to do with a quackcine, these are known poisons produced by the military. They are injectable Bioweapons, Period!
So about 5 or 6 years ago a piano teacher friend told me about a young Polish composer and pianist whom she thought a genius. This was not uncommon for her to do, so I wrote down the name and pretty much forgot about it until earlier this year and thought my friend correct.
Am not a religious person but I do think something is happening when artists kind of go into a state of being - they seem to become their art be it music, painting whatever and something astonishing is channelled to us - it's felt and moves us. She has been compared to Olafur Arnolds and Neils Frahm.
Hania Rani Komeda part 3 YouTube at 3mins 32 sec puts a flurry of notes into her Prophet 08, moves to begin an astonishing solo on a grand piano and leaves the rest for dust with utmost taste in combining classical and electronic, power and speed. There is also Hania Rani live at Invalides. I hope someone leads her here to be informed out of harms way.
Thank you for this, Sasha. Your work is appreciated. I think people have a vague presumption that these products are sterile, consistent, made with integrity, and carefully and perfectly manufactured under stringent conditions. (Not that I’d touch them with a ten-foot pile myself...even if they were.) I saw a news story a couple of years ago (just before all the Covid19 nonsense), about how poorly a major vaccine manufacturer performed during an inspection. The story noted how few inspectors there are in the USA...something like a dozen or so for the entire country? It was the story about some vaccine manufacturing plant in Georgia I believe, and how the employees didn’t have time to go the restroom, etc. I got the impression they didn’t hire enough employees, of course to keep those profits as high as possible. Do you have any information on this facet of manufacturing? (Lack of valid or sufficient inspections, and how they’re rather a farce).
Sasha, I have a question for you that is important to me. I hope you can answer it.
I have a problem with the nomenclature. Do you know of any pharmaceutical product which has ever listed a beneficial "side effect"? Or is "side effect" a euphemism for "harm"?
Dosage is often all that separates poison from medicine. Thus the reason we have an FDA here in the US! I have heard that the EU signed contracts allowing a variation in purity between 50% and 85%. This means it was always impossible to know what was in any of the vials. No one would have agreed to this, meaning no one truly gave informed consent. That is criminal.
Dare one share this before Christmas to those who took them?
Listening now Sasha, about a half way through ... and though you are several pay grades ahead of me, you explain this in a way a very good high school student can understand. For the high-school student in us all, I am posting a round-about reference to your post to several Facebook groups. Thank you so much for pulling back the curtains on those perverse 'wizards of odds' ... and I am hoping you stay safe from any potential blow-back from the corporate nation-state.
Cheers from Japan,
steve
ps
45:00 ... 'Safer when it's broken?' ... Pretty good indication that the prototype is a bioweapon.
52:00 ... Guessing that placebos were used as stage-art-propaganda-nudging by those in the know, but not included in studies.
More to come in a 2nd comment.
Thank you for writing & compiling this info
You are consistently the best Substack!!!! If I could only subscribe to one, I would keep yours. Thank you so much.
this is an amazing primer for everyone, will be sharing.
Hope this very important presentation of information is going to be used as evidence to show intent to harm. This one is going to be understood by the general public for sure, but I feel a lot of people are going to have a hard time coming to terms with what the countermeasures are really about.
Hi again Sasha,
I just finished a first listen ... and looking at the organizational charts hinting that the pre-existing institutional infrastructure was most likely responsible for making the prototypes, I could only sigh and come to the conclusion that 'glasnost' and 'perestoika' are fundamentally incompatible with scale. Inevitably, all institutions, especially at scale, appear to go through an evolution and decline. This process, at a smaller scale, was among my studies in educational psychology for game strategies in the building, functioning, and dissolution of task-based groups (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zolt%C3%A1n_D%C3%B6rnyei)
I am still reading A. Lobaczewski's 'Political Ponerology; The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of the Totalitarian State' ... and triangulating that with my intuition that Dunbar's number — an empathetic limit to the number of 'salient' (quantitatively problematic to say the least) relationships we can have (roughly between 150 and 250 people, and highly correlated with cross cultural replication studies) ... is also the limit of morality. Beyond small communities, compartmentalized 'need-to-know' information is not just a malicious, machiavellian act ... it necessarily replaces the immediacy and involvement of empathy-driven behavior because of the limits of human neural capacity (empathy, not just reason).
Among the take-aways from Lobaczewski are how sociopathic behaviors in the immediate family or community (running the gamut from purely genetic to trauma-induced morphological pathologies to transference from dysfunctional family relationships) are fractals of what happens at the scale of corporate nation-states.
But something else seeping into the picture, though not sure if it is from that book or elsewhere, is what I mentioned earlier ... how large organizations tend to drift towards a 'need-to-know' compartmentalization of information ... and it is fundamentally incompatible with empathy-driven behavior, moral autonomy, or an integrated world view.
At any rate ... the corruption you are exposing appears to be epiphenomenon of historically identifiable patterns of human nature, and the social sciences are going to either have to step up their game ... or as Laura Dodsworth's book, 'State of Fear' seems to suggest ... meritocraic institutions have already been reduced to credentialized, compartmentalized, corruption by those irredemable 'dark triads' drawn to concentrations of power.
We can chat about these things all day and night, and I can cross post and share with several 'private' Facebook groups ... but I suspect authoritative accountability will not come about through force of reason. We are accelerating into brutal times. Gary Sharpe's latest substack post is a good triangulation.
I am going to watch this at least a three or four times, the first couple of times for verification of what we've been gradually learning (and will come back to this comment to edit and add notes to myself and interested others), but the subsequent times (or more) for critical thinking / reasoning / presentation skills.
Fantastic work Sasha. I see your STEM chops as a perfect dove-tail for Margarette Anna Alice's more Liberal Arts approach to great critical thinking skills.
Thank you again Sasha.
Lots to think about, and not sure what to do.
steve
The product is much safer when not used at all.
Newsflash. Thank you.
Blessings.
Had to repeat your insight you suggested.
All deaths were intentionally killed.
Reblogged on Unorthodox Truth / michaelburgwin3.com
Thank you, Again for all your professional efforts.
Seems like they are gonna spring a new scamdemic anyday...
Thank you for this incredible information. I has been shared and I am considering more sharing. This is another incentive to action. What actions? Discussion is welcome. I myself have more than enough information and incentive to prioritize the analysis of "what actions", and I am astounded that very few are doing a full spectrum discussion and analysis of "what actions".
If I were to produce poisons to kill my enemies in an industrial setting, why would I bother to use expensive quality control protocols?
My conclusion since 2021 is that all of this was intentional.
I've never seen the same product in the past even produced in different countries, be so different in composition...
1. Some batches contain Aluminium (heavy metal) and other don't and in large concentrations (not a contaminant here!)
2. Some batches contain Ce-137 (radioactive - half life = 30years) and other don't and in large concentrations (not a contaminant here!)
3. Some batches have LNPs without MmRNA - Are these placebos being sold as quackcines???
4. Some batches have LNPs with partial MmRNA - which type of weird proteins do they produce? Not spikes for sure!
etc........
This is called crime against humanity. It has nothing to do with a quackcine, these are known poisons produced by the military. They are injectable Bioweapons, Period!
Example of Ukraine:
• Bioweapons Stakeholders
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F22cb8d54-e3df-4672-82c0-7a38bdeb5a57_1280x720.jpeg
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/09/20/russia-presents-evidence-of-us-ukraine-based-military-biological-activity-to-geneva-convention/
So about 5 or 6 years ago a piano teacher friend told me about a young Polish composer and pianist whom she thought a genius. This was not uncommon for her to do, so I wrote down the name and pretty much forgot about it until earlier this year and thought my friend correct.
Am not a religious person but I do think something is happening when artists kind of go into a state of being - they seem to become their art be it music, painting whatever and something astonishing is channelled to us - it's felt and moves us. She has been compared to Olafur Arnolds and Neils Frahm.
Hania Rani Komeda part 3 YouTube at 3mins 32 sec puts a flurry of notes into her Prophet 08, moves to begin an astonishing solo on a grand piano and leaves the rest for dust with utmost taste in combining classical and electronic, power and speed. There is also Hania Rani live at Invalides. I hope someone leads her here to be informed out of harms way.
Thank you for this, Sasha. Your work is appreciated. I think people have a vague presumption that these products are sterile, consistent, made with integrity, and carefully and perfectly manufactured under stringent conditions. (Not that I’d touch them with a ten-foot pile myself...even if they were.) I saw a news story a couple of years ago (just before all the Covid19 nonsense), about how poorly a major vaccine manufacturer performed during an inspection. The story noted how few inspectors there are in the USA...something like a dozen or so for the entire country? It was the story about some vaccine manufacturing plant in Georgia I believe, and how the employees didn’t have time to go the restroom, etc. I got the impression they didn’t hire enough employees, of course to keep those profits as high as possible. Do you have any information on this facet of manufacturing? (Lack of valid or sufficient inspections, and how they’re rather a farce).
Sasha, I have a question for you that is important to me. I hope you can answer it.
I have a problem with the nomenclature. Do you know of any pharmaceutical product which has ever listed a beneficial "side effect"? Or is "side effect" a euphemism for "harm"?