60 Comments
User's avatar
Stephan's avatar

If only the 1.2 million other American Families would file suit for their MURDERED Family/Loved members!!

Expand full comment
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

Or if a fund were established to cover their legal costs.

Definitely not telling anybody what to do though.

Expand full comment
Stephan's avatar

MEGA Class Action! 😁

Expand full comment
Renate Lindeman's avatar

The first successful one will set off a tsunami.

Expand full comment
Stephan's avatar

Let's hope so

Expand full comment
Suzanne O'Keeffe's avatar

🙏 casualties of war.

Expand full comment
Stephan's avatar

AMEN X 10 sister! 🙏

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Sasha. Your "Still Life with Pears" oil on panel is another masterpiece. Jus' sayin'...

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

You took the words right out of my mouth!

Expand full comment
alice's avatar

All soon to be lawyers ought to be paying close attention to this. As lawmakers expands,citizens easily get lost in it all. Lawyers need to be well versed

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Lawyers need to quit chasing ambulances for a living... Maybe revert back to kindergarten level reading skills...

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

Amen !

Expand full comment
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

Thank you so much for this update.

Expand full comment
andrew adach's avatar

We love you Sasha!

Expand full comment
robert stiles's avatar

Great news. Do I understand the issues that the DOD never denied committing this mass murder but pleaded they had sovereign immunity to do whatever they wanted?

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

correct.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Yes. Exactly. It is also interesting to note the allusion of "sovereign" immunity granted to the Washington, District of Columbia location. Washington, DC is it's own jurisdiction...

Excerpted from: International Organizations Immunities Act - Wikipedia

“The 79th United States Congress passed the International Organization Immunities Act on December 29, 1945; the Act can be found under Title 22, chapter 7, sub-chapter XVIII. The International Organization Immunities Act entitles international organizations and their employees to certain exemptions, immunities, and privileges that other organizations and their employees are not granted. In addition, the entitled benefits organizations and their employees receive are similar to the benefits that foreign governments are granted.

The International Organization Immunities Act was passed to strengthen the international organizations that the U.S. collaborates with, including those that are located in foreign countries. The Senate Committee believed that passing this Act would allow international organizations to perform more effectively and accomplish their goals.[3] The Food and Agriculture Organization, the International Labor Organization, and the United Nations are examples of designated public international organizations covered by the Act when it was passed.” See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Organizations_Immunities_Act

Note date of enactment. All is Fel in love and war…

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

Ha ha, I just posted similar information. The Government is a Corporation. It is owned by the Federal Reserve, I private, for profit, Bank.

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

Also here in Australia.

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

yes, all Governments are controlled by their central Banks. The coup happened after a series of meetings in Geneva where they all declared bankruptcy.

Expand full comment
Peter Haddad's avatar

meanwhile, as they wrangle back and forth, justice is simple... yet so hard to find

Expand full comment
Transcriber B's avatar

Relatedly— this compilation of 6 recorded calls to pharmacies in Dare County, North Carolina in 2021 shows the confusion and the gaslighting around this issue:

"Which Dare County pharmacies are administering the only FDA approved Covid vaccine?"

Dare to Share OBX, November 25, 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0Fdxl5KGZfUN/

TRANSCRIPT

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This is a series of recorded phone calls made to Dare County, North Carolina pharmacies. There are no images.

TEXT ON SCREEN: November 9, 2021

The only FDA approved COVID-19 vaccine is called Comirnaty. The others are still under an Emergency Use Authorization.

TEXT ON SCREEN:

CVS Pharmacy

1101 S Croatan Hwy

Kill Devil Hills NC

[telephone ringing]

FEMALE VOICE: Thank you for calling the CVS Pharmacy. How can I help you?

CALLER: Do you have the covid 19 vaccines in stock?

FEMALE VOICE: Let me just check. Hold on.

CALLER: Thank you.

FEMALE VOICE: Yeah. They are using Moderna.

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Sunshine Pharmacy

1187 Duck Rd

Duck, NC

CALLER: Y'all have the Pfizer vaccine available?

MALE VOICE: Yes I do.

CALLER: OK, I was wondering, do you have the Comirnaty, the one that's FDA approved? Or do you have the BioNTech, the one that's still under an EUA [Emergency Use Authorization]?

MALE VOICE: They're all approved now!

CALLER: The Comirnaty has been approved. So I was wondering if the ones that you have there by Pfizer have the Comirnaty label on them.

MALE VOICE: Oh, I don't have a clue. Hold on. No. You might want to try Walgreens.

CALLER: OK. So yours don't say Comirnaty on them?

MALE VOICE: No ma'am.

0:52

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Walgreens Pharmacy

1200 S Croatan Hwy

Kill Devil Hills NC

CALLER: Are you offering the Pfizer covid vaccine?

MALE VOICE: No. We do not have that.

CALLER: Oh, do you ha—

MALE VOICE: We have the Moderna.

CALLER: Is that still under Emergency Use Authorization, the Moderna?

MALE VOICE: Uh, no. Well, I mean, it's, it's, it's, to be honest I'm not sure. I think they took all the mRNAs are off, but, um, except for like children, younger people and stuff they have, but I think the regular Moderna is off but— [voice fades as he asks someone there in the pharmacy]— [inaudible] Moderna off emergency use, do you know? I'm sure what I've heard—

FEMALE VOICE IN PHARMACY: Yeah, it's still.

MALE VOICE: It's still emergency use?

FEMALE VOICE IN PHARMACY: Yes.

MALE VOICE [returning to caller] Yeah. Yeah the pharmacist here said that yeah she thinks it's still under emergency use protocol.

1:33

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Walmart PHarmacy

5400 N Croatan Hwy

Kitty Hawk, NC

CALLER: Hi, I was wondering if you have the Pfizer covid 19 vaccine in stock?

FEMALE VOICE: Yes, ma'am, we do.

CALLER: Is it the Pfizer Comirnaty or is it the Pfizer BioNTech that's still under Emergency Use Authorization?

FEMALE VOICE: Uh, it's, it's the normal Pfizer, the only one that we have, the BioTech [sic]

CALLER: OK, so nowhere on the label or package it says Comirnaty on it?

FEMALE VOICE: No, ma'am. I've never heard about that. We have BioTech [sic]

2:05

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Bear Drugs

5200N Croatan Hwy

Kitty Hawk, NC

FEMALE VOICE: We have them all.

CALLER: OK. Do you have the Pfizer?

FEMALE VOICE: I do.

CALLER: Is that the Comirnaty? Or is it, is it the Pfizer BioNTech that's still under Emergency Use Authorization?

FEMALE VOICE: That I'm not sure of. Let me let you speak with the vaccine pharmacist. Hold on.

CALLER: Thank you.

[music]

MALE VOICE: Both of them are the exact same vaccine. So BioNTech developed it, Pfizer manufactures it.

CALLER: I understand that they are interchangeable but still legally distinct, so I was wondering, which ones you have, how are they labeled? Comirnaty?

MALE VOICE: It's labeled Pfizer. But it's like, it's the exact same vaccine, so it's like there's hmmm, there's no difference between the two [inaudible] including legally. It's like, um, I think BioNTech has some licensing in other countries and, like, and Pfizer has some licensing in the US. But other than that, it's the exact same thing, a global label.

CALLER: So your, your Pfizer vials there, the package does not say Comirnaty.

MALE VOICE: Hmmm, yeah, it's like they haven't branded that, branded it yet because all the of ones they made previously were before it was FDA approved.

3:20

TEXT ON SCREEN:

CVS Pharmacy

5547 N Croatan Hwy

Kitty Hawk, NC

FEMALE: Yes. So Pfizer.

CALLER: The Pfizer— do you know which, if it's the Pfizer that's the Comirnaty?

FEMALE VOICE: I have no idea.

CALLER: Alright. Is there someone there that I could speak with who might know?

FEMALE VOICE: Um, hold on.

CALLER: Thanks.

[music]

FEMALE VOICE: My pharmacist says, yes it is.

CALLER: Yes it is what now?

FEMALE VOICE: Ah, whatever, Comarnity, the FDA, whatever you— the answer to your question.

CALLER: Comirnaty?

FEMALE VOICE: Yes.

CALLER: So the ones that you are administering are the Comirnaty?

FEMALE VOICE: Yeah, it says, FDA-approved BioNTech—

3:52

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Only one out of the six Dare County

pharmacies called are administering

the FDA approved Comirnaty.

[recording of same phone call continues]

—biologic license application BLA for Comirnaty Covid 19 Vaccine mRNA under US license number 2229.

TEXT ON SCREEN:

The Pfizer-BioNTech

not labeled Comirntay, is still under an EUA

[recording of same phone call continues]

CALLER: That's the label that you're reading that's on the package of the vials?

FEMALE VOICE: Yes.

4:15

TEXT ON SCREEN

BioNTech, Moderna: only authorized for

emergency use, with zero liability for injury

Pfizer Comirnaty: FDA approved

and company can be sued for injury

4:26

[END]

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

The courts will never correct anything. There was a coup that took place in 1933 when FDR declared the US to be Bankrupt and a new Corporate Entity was established which also called itself the United States which resides in DC. The Government is bankrupt and is now entirely beholden to its creditors, the Central Bankers. Our birth certificates are securitized debt that make us chattel. Unless we understand this and take control of the Security that was made from our birth certificate, or declare that you are not a citizen of the corporate United States, but a national of the State where you reside, then you only have rights under the Uniform Commercial Code, not the Constitution. The Courts are functioning under Admiralty Jurisdiction which is Merchant Law, and as such, the Government contractors have broken no laws. It is all legal fiction.

Expand full comment
Seeds's avatar

"Fruit From A Poisonous Tree" by Melvin Stamper is a good place to start for enlightenment.

Expand full comment
Karla M LaZier's avatar

Thx Tami please provide references so I can pursue this matter further. Appreciate it, Karla

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

It's a deep rabbit hole. Study the 14th amendment and its issues. Listen to Howard Freeman lectures. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQErlxBTWuY&t=11s. https://famguardian.org/PublishedAuthors/Indiv/FreemanHoward/freeman5.htm, " 1938 and the Erie Railroad

Well, I began to investigate. I found that 1938 was the

year of the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins case of the Supreme Court.

It was also the year the courts claim they blended Law with

Equity. I read the Erie Railroad case. A man had sued the Erie

railroad for damages when he was struck by a board sticking out

of a boxcar as he walked along beside the tracks. The district

court had decided on the basis of Commercial (Negotiable

Instruments) Law that this man was not under any contract with

the Erie Railroad, and therefore he had no standing to sue the

company. Under the Common Law, he was damaged and he would have

had the right to sue.

This overturned a standing decision of over one hundred

years. Swift v. Tyson in 1840 was a similar case and the

decision of the supreme Court was that in any case of this type,

the court would judge the case on the Common Law of the State

where the incident occurred -- in this case, Pennsylvania.

But, in the Erie Railroad case, the supreme Court ruled that all

federal cases will be judged under the Negotiable Instruments

Law. There would be no more decisions based on the Common Law at

the federal level. So, here we find the blending of Law with

Equity." Read the whole thing, and then read it again. Then read this https://coppermoonshinestills.com/beat-the-law-state-citizen-passport/

Expand full comment
Karla M LaZier's avatar

Thx- down the rabbit

hole I’ll go.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Tami Berman. You are eminently correct. +100 likes.

Expand full comment
Scott pecorino's avatar

You cannot mandate an experimental vaccine so the pretended to say Comirnaty was fully licensed. Comirnaty was never available in the United States

Expand full comment
GreaterIsrahell's avatar

Even though this case is far from won, it is good to see the case is still "alive". Thank you for what I choose to call good news.

Beautiful pears, too.

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

One Judge erroneously ruled, Rule 60 error of court filed, judge appealed … Insane!! Error clearly spelled out - case should have three judge panel. Fraud Upon People! Pointed out yet the judge files ruling appeal based on what? Sovereign Immunity? Tactics. Katherine Watts is attempting to put the “Sovereign Immunity” into spotlight … rightly so. Abusive legal maneuver tied to guarantee “safe protected income streams”, profits (wildly excessive - see previous fifty years of slump pharm performance). The case should draw attention to fact never in history has the United States Government (a representative based democratic government) isolated itself from its primary duty of Protection of Citizens Against All Enemies Foreign and Domestic. Hiding its fraud behind exclusionary “Sovereign Immunity” in order to escape a de facto face of proven Fraud and Public Harm. If the case loses, this proves Intent. Intent to profit at any expense of life. If case succeeds, opens door to cases opening in the millions. The closer Katherine gets to blowing open the battleship, a New Urgent or National Emergency will erupt. Guarantee.

Expand full comment
Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Dr.Don Hall. Correct. The judge ruled in error, and should be served a Writ of Quo Warranto based on his breach of duty Malfeasance. The Sovereign Immunity "act" is an intended diversion. Katherine Watt has exposed much of the 'legal' bamboozle. Thank you for commenting.

Expand full comment
Marjorie Lunsford's avatar

Good information. Thanks! What an AMAZING painting!!!!!!

Expand full comment
Grant Simmons ( Australia)'s avatar

I pray for some kind of legal miracle , but I fear , that the entire legal system not just in the US , but in western civilization , has been so gamed , so rigged with a politically

" chosen " , not to represent justice or liberty or public interests , but to fortify the interests of government , their agencies and it's sponsors . Not to say that all those participating in the " legal system " have ill intention , but there are enough in the right places at the right rime to do the government bidding.....the courts are effectively the governments' suit of armour and I fear , that this is not where we will find a remedy .....🤷🏻‍♂️🙏🙏🏾

Expand full comment
Suzanne O'Keeffe's avatar

If I recall correctly, Katherine Watt recommended suing Lloyd Austin III as a person, not an official. I imagine that cannot be adjusted at this time in this suit.

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

Thank you Sasha. It is outrageous that out of the trillions of dollars the “Big Beautiful ( BARF) Bill, apparently not one cent is set aside for the vaccine injured.

Expand full comment
Renate Lindeman's avatar

They are not vaccine injured in a sense that injury/death was unintentional and therefor should/could be compensated. They are victims of countermeasures (injectable weapons). The injuries and deaths are intentional. Hence the show of an 'approved vaccine' while they kept injecting the bioweapons.

Expand full comment