Psychology of Physiology — a ‘Mind Form’ created by the initial damage from Vaccines
Introduction:
My Son who is now 20 years old, was born premature; he was only 2 lbs, body weight. Yet, in spite of the premature status, doctors at that time thought it would be a good idea to “Vaccinate” him, it’s not just the vaccine, it’s the fact that he was given the same amount of vaccine (Dtap) as a 12 lbs baby would get. No BMI adjustment. He could have survived just fine without any “injections,” in my opinion. If only I had been more aware back then like I am now….
Newborns and Vaccines:
Babies brains develop over the course of years after birth, most of the myelin sheath is still forming in a regular newborn, and continues until at least the age of 4. Vaccine adjuvants cause multiple types of damage to the myelin sheath both in the brain as well as in other nerve connections throughout the body.
My son has had Autism since he was very young, didn’t get diagnosed for it until he had a seizure once, before entering Kindergarten. At this point, things got very difficult for our family. The seizure indicates an initial brain damage, I specifically point to Vaccines.
At school, he was picked on by many characters, who now vividly populate his memories; like a form of PTSD, they are trapped there and are played back in his mind as a dialog. He has a very advanced ability to remember things in his long term memory but an inability to be functional with short term memory. So, he’s stuck with a focus on what’s most dramatically ingrained in the long term side.
He was later diagnosed with a type of OCD, with respect to how he relates his memory; combined with this dialog, it intensifies as it progresses and even though the dialogs are only cyclic and don’t last.
Physiological into Psychological:
It would seem that when He experiences something physiological such as an example; stomach pain, that originates from his physical sensations, He cannot relate or describe this discomfort accurately and his reaction is to form a direct connection to his memories. This pain is met with his anger, in rebellion against the sensation, as though the past experiences are the source of his present discomfort. He externalizes the source of that pain he experiences with his body, as though it was “caused” by the characters with vivid imagination, coming from his memories.
When his emotions rise up, this evokes his memories of his experiences with the kids he didn't like from his past, they become personifications of the senses. Anger is not the only emotion involved. Yet, with anger, the resulting dialog becomes a type of self sustaining focused rage; he shows no awareness of the fact that it all comes from something he is experiencing physically in his body.
From experience, I can say that Vaccines adversely alter our natural manner in which we relate to our body. The nerves are an important grounding for our five senses, if the damage to them starts early enough, the resulting "imbalance" becomes a form of baked in balance, the body can normalize.
There are many ways to describe WHY vaccines should be banned, the best way is to point to a personal experience.
The idea that there are laws that codified this form of torture, is what galvanizes my determination that "Government" should also be Banned.
You speak truth, painful truth for you, your son, and your family.
This coercive nature of the Government-Pharma mafia inflicting unnatural and harmful "vaccines" and "therapies" on newborns and the rest of us is being overlooked by too many.
Also, another important point to discuss is why the medical establishment tells us that sick, infirmed, and otherwise vulnerable people with immature or stressed immunity should be injected with system-disturbing so-called "vaccines."
The alleged immunity shots are hard on our physiologies, so it would stand to reason that only older, healthy, and robust people could tolerate them with minimal side-effects. Instead, they tell us that especially the weak among us should be shot up with their toxic brews.
Whether their agenda is one of health or disability and death answers itself.
nefahotep, thanks for this powerful account. i have a relative who suffers much like your son has. the connection between ptsd and physical discomfort seems like a deep one which we should explore
Conscientious observation, care and compassion for those who suffer from the ill effects of vaccines, will be the best way forward. At times this may be very difficult.
Society at large now has an opportunity to reject vaccines out of hand. If that can happen, the future will be far healthier for generations to come.
dealing with a seriously vax-damaged child is brutally difficult, i've seen it over and over again. the amount of patience that it requires is staggering because of the endless cycle of behavioral issues.
guessing that those behind current power structures will try to lure us into mrna poison hell by switching out the vaccines for gene therapy. lots of damaged desperate people will try anything to survive
Bk in the UK I used to know a friend's child who is severely autistic (non verbal). She attended specialist day schools and then was looked after at home till when the parents became concerned about their ability to care for her at home as they got old and the child became physically strong and more active than the parents. She is now in residential care. the parents visit her regularly. (Finding a suitable placement for her is another story. She changed her placement a few times plus funding issues) Her mum (friend ) said to me once "it looks like the child's brain is jammed". She displays repetitive behaviour as well (can be interpreted as OCD and can be quite destructive) and it was felt the way she was functioning came from the cerebellum part of her brain (which I understand coordinates and regulates things like behaviour and memorising.) Of course NHS psychiatrists wouldn't dare touch the root cause. At one point, she was intensively screaming and head banging. The docs would just hospitalise her and give her sedative pills (to shut her up) and useless and endless psychology assessments to monitor the progress.
This friend has heard of the vaccine hypothesis (as well as some other suspected causes for autism)but her response is like, 'there's no way to reverse the child condition and I just wanna focus on her care and present need'. I wished she had had more ability to dig in as she could have warned other parents. And We have been also hypnotised and told to not interfere with medical doctors' decisions (as they are well trained and know better and are given so much power by the govt and the health care structure)
Now the UK sees the rise in children on disability benefits. I wonder why.......
Some people have had a difficult time connecting "injections" to such outward behavior as seen in Autism and OCD. This is largely because the majority of people who could make a difference, who hold some of the control levers of the medical system, have only been able to get there due to their "programing." I'm sure in the UK there's varying degrees of internal opposition to vaccine schedules.
The sense that I have is; Autism and other afflictions, are there by Design, as an intended feature. The result is ever more people who are adults will need additional care, they won't be Independent. Also, the thing that happens to families, having to provide intensive care, creates a giant attention sucking distraction; this greatly reduces our ability to "respond" to ever more trains of abuse from the Administrative State.
Disability is an advantage to the Globalists Parasites who have created most of this mess.
I'm very sorry to hear of your friend's condition, like your friend, we will likely need to find some type of remedial care, for my son.
It is a worry for any parents of children with special needs. I hope you will be able to find adequate remedial care for your son and well trained helpers. In the US, my understanding is in the pre cvd, blue states would more likely provide better support for SEN kids. But since the cvd, the dynamic seems.to have changed? An acquaintance in the US had a worker who wasn't well trained and was stepping over the boundaries.
Yes, globalists' plan to cause setbacks and reduce the population. no matter how hard some folks sugar coat the conditions (like they are indigo and crystal children sent to rescue the humanity), given the level of care the immediate families have to provide. The above UK friend has an older child (with no SEN) became bulimic when she was in her mid 20's. She was demanding more attention from her parents (as her parents are more attentive to the autistic daughter's needs). Also food seems like an issue for many of autistic children. (I used to work with a disabled children's team).
Take good care of yourselves. May you be guided to a right solution.
"Autism and other afflictions, are there by Design, as an intended feature."
Every state legislator should know your testimony, Nefahotep. I've given up on Congress because each member of Congress serves BlackRock Investments in order to fund their campaigns. But it wouldn't hurt if every member of Congress knew your testimony as well.
Repeal all State of Emergency law in the several States!
Most of this legislation arose after 2000. We got along without it fine before 2000. We were greatly damaged by it in 2020.
"Whatever else you do, please, never allow yourself or anyone you care about to receive a product labelled as a 'vaccine'.
The entire field is fraud and a long planned method for injuring & killing people. Of this I am sure. It sounds diabolical, doesn’t it? That’s because it’s precisely that.
There’s a long history that led us trusting humans to this day. Until you learn the horrifying details, protect yourself and those close to you."
“Public Health is not health…” this absolutely the key thing. Thinking and planning in terms of ‘Public Health’ leads to the demise of the individual-centric doctor-patient relationship which should always be at the heart of the physician’s work because every patient is an individual and is different in his/her needs.
For me public = the collective = the group, and you cannot diagnose or treat the collective because it is an abstraction, it does not exist in a medical sense, only the individual exists.
A good start would be to stop using the term ‘public health’. Call it ‘Individual Health’ to better convey what health is about. Just that one simple action might reset the way people think about healthcare in a positive way.
When I think of “public health,” I think of proper sanitation, like sewer systems, clean water and the like. Much of infectious disease in history was diminished by proper sanitation and clean water rather than any vaccine. Think about how the Black Death was diminished when the population of rats in cities was controlled.
Thank you for your fair and constructive critique of my proposal for a vaccine moratorium. I agree in lieu of clinical trials that existing databases could be used to construct large cohorts for comparison of vaxxed vs unvaxxed kids. You mention 11+ such databases. The VSD would seem to be useful in this regard - what others should RFK, Jr. and his team incorporate into such an analysis?
Thank you! I don't remember all databases off the top of my head, but there is Medicaid data (overvaxxed children of the poor), there is VA data, there are of course datasets from the FDA clinical trials, and many health outcomes datasets now. There should be a massive shakedown at the HHS to get them to cough up everything. And yes, that's the best way, just run a retrospective analysis of these data, because vax schedule has been increasing over time, so we could see what happened when there were few vaccines, low % uptake and what happened after more and more shots were added. The states can be compared, the ones that are totally vax-nazis (CA) vs the ones that have exemptions. All sorts of things can be designed.
Informed consent, in the context of medical treatment or medical research, transcends the unspoken ethical responsibilities of the patient-physician relationship. It is, in fact, a legal obligation.
Seen from the legal perspective, informed consent in a medical setting entails the bodily integrity of the individual patient or research subject. It is grounded in the idea of an individual’s personal autonomy—that is, their capacity for self‐determination and self‐governance.
What this means in practice is that a patient or research subject must be given sufficient information about any and all pending treatments, including the risks and benefits of those treatments, the existence and availability of any alternative treatments, the patient’s role in treatment, and the patient’s right to refuse treatment.
The problem we currently have is that informed consent in the current climate is virtually impossible due to the iron wall of Pharma control over the information flow and their front line soldiers aka pediatricians/doctors who stand in the way of anything resembling informed consent and actively work to deceive the public and do so in order to receive the fat kickbacks.
What is regularly portrayed as a medical issue or a knowledge issue is in fact, as is the case with most things, a political issue and until the forces that control the political landscape are overturned one can expect business as usual.
I never heard of this nominee for US Surgeon General before, but, when she was nominated, I heard someone comment that she, at some point in time, told people to mask up and get your vaccine. If she did say this in the past, I hope that she realized her error and has since educated herself. I hope she is no longer on that track. I so wish that Dr. Ladapo, Surgeon General in FL, would have been nominated as US Surgeon General.
The problem is that various vaccine sceptics are captured at different points in the vaccine science spectrum. After trans-generational brainwashing, it is difficult to rise above that spectrum, have an objective outlook of the whole landscape and start rejecting even fundamental terminology deeply etched into our brains.
Sasha, I agree with you 100% here. Thank you for emphasizing that children are not lab rats. But even conducing vaccine trial on lab rats would be unwarranted at this point.
Sasha, the answer to all this back and forth is simple, it is this simple logical scientific conclusion the psychopaths will never see, that their business model is built on a lie, a lie that is easily exposed through practical observation happening in real time over decades. This brings the parasites who propagate this hoax and deprive there enormous $ from the propagation of this lie to use language to say that no is yes.
The entire foundation and application of vaccines is a total lie, a ruthless fantasy that is used to enslave and enrich the psychopaths who worship it for entirely selfish sadistic reasons.
You do amazing work and have the mind and spirit of a true warrior.
Great ideas. I would be interested in understanding how MD's could be accountable for their lack of TRUE informed consent which is happening now. Pediatricians hold tremendous power over newborn parents who trust them implicitly. Unless there are severe penalties for not providing accurate and thorough informed consent pediatricians will continue to convince parents that vaccines are "safe and effective". There needs to be a major public educational initiative that will help inform everyone of vaccines true risks and benefits.
Physicians were told lies by the FDA and CDC about the safety and efficacy of the COVID jabs (non-vaccines). They accepted these lies because years of “education” taught them about the benefits of vaccines. So, I can understand why they were administering them to their patients and received the jabs themselves early on. But it didn’t take long for the reports of adverse events to start coming out that should have led them to question their safety, even though the CDC tried to tell them these adverse events occurred more with infection than with the jab. It should be clear to all of them by now that these jabs are not safe and do not decrease the risk of hospitalization or death from the infection. My first instinct not to take the jab is that I knew that they were developed and/or tested using cell cultures derived from the tissue harvesting from healthy babies during elective abortions (kidney and retina). But that’s another story.
Superb response to Mr Edward Geehr's proposals. I (unfortunately) was once on the "Informed Consent" bandwagon. After reading a few thousand reader comments, I became convinced that informed consent presumes the consenter has some modest level of cognitive skill. Erm...
'Vaccine' experiments on children, regardless of regulation, parental consent, or other excuse, is a crime against Nature. In my opinion, if the intended "vaccination" utilizes modified genetic materials of any kind, it is genetic assault (rape) manslaughter, or premeditated murder.
When will medical professionals actually *discern* the differences between Medicines and poisons?
Here I'd say that most of clinical pharmacology is the (hopefully) judicious use of synthetic chemicals and poisons to achieve a therapeutic response. Though many / most are wrongly prescribed I still think that there are legitimate "exceptional" uses for some of these in modern medical and surgical practice. If it is implied by some that there is no possible way to perform an ethical clinical trial on children then I would have to disagree. My own pharmaceutical nihilism yields before I could forsake a desperately ill child. However, no matter how desperate the case , the strictest adherence to informed consent and ethical intent must be maintained. Otherwise, predatory research practices will be a threat.
The judicious use of pharmaceutical products disappeared when clinical medicine became a business enterprise. The modern medical system is a complete fraud.
> it is not ethical to then propose to remedy this by a human-subject protected clinical trial, especially in children who cannot legally consent. And there is no scientific "equivalent" that can establish safety of something known to be toxic.
Is your point:
1. Vaccine experiments on children are unethical because children can't consent, or
2. Vaccine experiments on children are unethical because children can't consent and there's sufficient correlational evidence that vaccines are toxic (or, more softly, that they likely have a large net negative effect)
?
If point 1, then how do you look at non-vaccine interventions on children?
If point 2, you know the common response will be that the evidence is too weak, and then the response to that is that pharma & government are either not looking for the evidence and/or suppressing it, but then that just looks like an unresolvable disagreement. One idea would be to require pharma & government gather better evidence with independent oversight, and run the studies on the data they already have comparing to non-vaxxed children (correlational but probably the best that can be done).
It's both 1 and 2. It is also important to understand that there is a difference between "knowingly" and "unknowingly" causing harm. Once someone knows vaccines are harmful (which all critics of vaccines do), they can't advocate for testing them to "get science", especially on children. If you kill someone because you didn't know it's a manslaughter. If you killed someone when you knew you could kill them - it's now a murder. If you designed an "experiment" in which you knew you could kill a child - it's a premeditated murder now.
Finally, the evidence is not weak. It is in fact overwhelming, but hidden and suppressed by the criminal cartel that masquerades as the HHS. So, the goal should be to get them to cough it up, not "test on more children for science".
> Once someone knows vaccines are harmful (which all critics of vaccines do)
I imagine Siri is leaning that way but doesn't actually know, which does seem to be the most rational way to look at it. I agree it's unfair. Pharma and government have conspired and/or are incompetent and so we just have to go off hunches, but my point is not to question the spectrum of hunches (you = extremely high, Siri & co = medium), but how to convince the other side who's opinions are in the total opposite direction.
If a "vaccine" is completely safe and has NO toxic ingredients then it will simply be processed out of your body in a few days. That is what the body is meant to do. Shots have to have toxic ingredients to make it stay in the body longer than a few days.
No, it won't be "processed". Injections of proteins create permanent damage - anaphylaxis. Even organic raw milk, if injected, can kill or create a permanent injury (lactose intolerance for life, which is not "minor" issue). This was known since 1913, a Nobel Prize was awarded for this piece of science.
My gut is also highly skeptical of vaccines but a survey by Steve of his own audience seems like the most confounded study design that I can think of. I'm surprised you all consider this clear evidence.
I've read the Vax-Unvax book by Hooker & RFK and that's the strongest data I've seen but my point is how would pro-vaxx people be convinced? Clearly, 50 years of vaxx-skeptical people's arguments are not working, so that's why I was thinking about what could be proposed that's both ethical and strong evidence. The major hope right now seems to be RFK getting confirmed and getting at all the raw data of vaxxes vs unvaxxed.
I can see how one could automatically think that, but Steve's audience does contain a large number of anti-vax people who are all vaccinated and their kids too. Being anti- or pro- vax doesn't change whether a) you or your kids were vaccinated or b) one developed certain traits or illnesses later in life.
What about the time correlation of SIDS developing pre-wellness check vs. post-wellness check?
--
Former Omaha police detective reveals 50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours post vaccine
My 16-minute interview of Jennifer, a former police detective in a major US city who handled over 250 SIDS investigations over 7 years implicates the childhood vaccines are the major cause of SIDS.
3 to 4 cases per month, so over 250 cases total during her tenure
50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours of a vaccine administration. Assuming kids are vaccinated every month (which is the most conservative assumption), the chance of this happening by chance is 1.23e-64. This means the cases were caused by the vaccine since there is no other viable hypothesis that can explain the evidence.
70% of SIDS cases happened within 1 week of a vaccination.
Her pediatrician acknowledged this and didn’t argue with the data.
The American Academy of Pediatrics trains doctors on how to gaslight patients who suspect the vaccine caused their child’s death.
Jennifer declined to publicly reveal her name or the police department she worked for, but revealed this to me so I could verify everything using independent sources.
The police department declined to respond to my records count request because it is outside the scope of the state’s FOIA laws since it cannot be accomplished with a straightforward query and “research” would be required. I agree with their interpretation, but I’ve requested they comply anyway as a matter of public benefit. I will update this article when I hear back from them.
I'm 58 years old (born and lived in Hungary until I was 21), have three grown children between the ages of 23 and 28, who were born in NJ.
I has always wondered what was the reason to give an ever increasing number of vaccines for my children. Between my first, second and third child, I saw the shots dramatically increased. The number of shots my newborns received between 1996 (my first born), and the shots my third child received in 2001 increased from one to four. I was horrified as I watched it dazed after giving birth naturally, as my newborn son got 4 shots into his heals - 2 in each. The nurse brought in papers to sign the consent form. Nothing was explained. My gut feeling was that those shots were not needed for my child, but I thought, at least, the shots would not do harm, otherwise the doctors would not allowe it.
More and more shots were happening especially during the first 18 months of my children's life. I could not understand why my children had to have these shots in the first place? They were very healthy otherwise, unlike many other children around us - absolutely no developmental illnesses, no allergies, no chronic diseases, rare occasions of minor common cold infections. The pediatrician kept asking me what I did to keep them so healthy. Yet, we kept going for the well checkups and he kept giving them those vaccine. I never liked the idea of vaccination, though. What happened in the last couple of decades in America, I was wondering to myself often. We did have these many shots as children... I was born and raised in Hungary and received no immunization shots except the oral polio drops (by now, I know how dangerous that one was as well!) and a TB shot, when I was around 7-8 years old, because my grandfather had TB. I naturally caught Chicken pox as a 6 year old, and have vivid memories of having itching dry scabs. I had Mumps when I was 11. There were other children around me, who had Rubeola, but I never got that, strangely. Most of the children in my small town located next to the Austrian border (18K people), had some of those infections, but not one had them all. Even as a child, I was wondering, why I did not get Rubeola in spite of never isolating myself from my best friend, who came down with it, for instance. Yet, I got Mumps, but never had any close contact with anyone I knew, who had it. I heard that there were a few other children in town, who came down with it. Not not one person I knew (or heard of ) who had any complications from these childhood viral infections for those 21 years I lived in that town. (...and believe me, the news spread there faster than today, because everyone had at least a cursory knowledge of everybody else... people had spent a lot more time being together and talking to each other back then!) Even as a child, I had the feeling that these communicable illnesses spread in a "mysterious way" and each of us were perhaps exposed, yet responded differently to the viruses. For instance, my 2 years younger brother had contracted none of these childhood illnesses (!), while I was sick next to him with Chicken Pox and Mumps!
My daughter came down with a viral meningitis, when she was 11, immediately following one of her immunization shots. First, she developed fever (of which, I was not much alarmed, initially), but she could not shake it off, and after 10 days, her fever got out of control, plus she developed severe head and neck aches. I rushed her to the emergency room and after two days waiting for the spinal tab result, she was diagnosed with viral meningitis. She was extremely ill, she spent about 3 weeks in the hospital and took her 6 more weeks to recover, yet never recovered to be her healthy self as she was before. I kept telling the doctors that the immunization shot gave her the meningitis, but they said it was no such thing and treated me with a smug attitude. At that time, in 2007, I did not know about VAERS and I'm 100% sure that no doctor reported my daughter's case to VAERS either. I only learned through covid years that yes, meningitis is a well known side effect of childhood vaccination! I wish I could just go and remind that pediatrician about that now!
I got no support from the doctors about my suspicion that the meningitis was a side effect of the vaccination, however from that point on, I started seriously doubt the safety of childhood immunization and even the need for it. I felt traumatized each time my children got another vaccine worrying about what would happen to them. I remember to keep asking if the shots were needed? Can we not take them, I kept asking. I explained each time that I was worried about the side effects ever since my daughter's case... Yet, he kept telling me that according to the research the vaccines can never cause meningitis, and perhaps my daughter got the illness as a result of a secondary infection due to a common cold... (How? She was not ill with a cold, when she got the vaccine? ... I was thinking), and yes, vaccination scheduled is required (!) for school. Of course, none of it was true. Also, through covid I learned that those shots were not mandatory for school. NJ grants religious exemption! Yet, my children's pediatrician lied to me for 2 decades with a straight face!
My children received all the "recommended" vaccines up until they were 18, including the dreadful HPV! I want to cry out loud just thinking about it, and have moments when I feel like to give a visit to their pediatrician, or at least send a letter to him enlightening him about the crimes that he committed against my children and the lies he told me... and remind him that he might be protected from humans' law, but he won't escape from the ultimate punishment.
Yes, I have become an anti-vaxxer in the last four years, and proudly carry the title. My only hope of redemption for my ignorance is that my grandchildren will have a chance to avoid these terrible poisons and human experimentations. My oldest one, my daughter, is 28 years old now and planning to have children soon. She promised, my grandchildren won't get any vaccines!
Kirsch brings up good points and bad points. He became a cheap sensationalist who does not shy away from any BS that promotes his agenda (with which I agree in general) and has never ever corrected himself. So you need to be very careful with his arguments and never never take Steve's claim at its face value.
Anybody who follows Bigtree and Siri knows their stance perfectly. It’s a question of subtle “political” nuances if you expect/wish to be heard and make a difference. You can either want a revolution or diplomacy.....the result will probably be the same any which way you go.....
The whole innate versus acquired immunity is a real quandary. Some are so convinced of it and in such detail . If they are wrong , what on earth have they been 'researching' all these years. :( :( . Is there really no pre-priming from exposure ?? I told people as long as they had had lots of colds they'd gotten over theyd probably be ok with covid. It was a non threatening argument against jabs at least.
Added to jab tyranny we had mask tyranny tho which I think did a hell of a lot of harm. I considered it to be about organising people rather than health but I knew airlessness and dank masks was a bad idea healthwise. BTw Is it true that caucasians respire partly through our skin so we cant hold our breath so long ? I found it odd that despite having larger lungs and fresher air than average, and a good ability to freedive underwater.. I'm not able to cope with a mask for more than a few minutes.
The thought of these old folks and children being both jabbed and masked is a horror :(
Hi Sasha...I'm in with you 100%. I just a day or two ago wrote much the same thing regarding the vaccination schedules in Canada...to the CCCA. The Canadian Covid Care Alliance is gathering information (FOIA) from the government (like pulling teeth from a live Javelina) to provide public justification for revamping the entire "health care" (death care) in Canada. Still in the fight Sasha, and making progress, thanks to you. A rhetorical question...(triggered by Yountville Cross)....should not all wine making cease immediately due to "global warming"? As I understand the process...17 bottles of CO2 are produced along with every bottle of vino...if the occasional cow fart is ruining the planet, why is wine still being produced...(I am being facetious...I have not bought into the Clinton/Gore/Schwabb climate fraud.) Is it true that most "eugenicists" love their wine, while the "useless eaters/deplorables" get fluoride in their water instead? LET'S WEIGH THAT ON THE SCALE...our menu is bugs and flouride, and the folks that are mandating us to death WITH "VACCINES" use wine and Kobe...and stem cells from aborted baby humans.
Psychology of Physiology — a ‘Mind Form’ created by the initial damage from Vaccines
Introduction:
My Son who is now 20 years old, was born premature; he was only 2 lbs, body weight. Yet, in spite of the premature status, doctors at that time thought it would be a good idea to “Vaccinate” him, it’s not just the vaccine, it’s the fact that he was given the same amount of vaccine (Dtap) as a 12 lbs baby would get. No BMI adjustment. He could have survived just fine without any “injections,” in my opinion. If only I had been more aware back then like I am now….
Newborns and Vaccines:
Babies brains develop over the course of years after birth, most of the myelin sheath is still forming in a regular newborn, and continues until at least the age of 4. Vaccine adjuvants cause multiple types of damage to the myelin sheath both in the brain as well as in other nerve connections throughout the body.
My son has had Autism since he was very young, didn’t get diagnosed for it until he had a seizure once, before entering Kindergarten. At this point, things got very difficult for our family. The seizure indicates an initial brain damage, I specifically point to Vaccines.
At school, he was picked on by many characters, who now vividly populate his memories; like a form of PTSD, they are trapped there and are played back in his mind as a dialog. He has a very advanced ability to remember things in his long term memory but an inability to be functional with short term memory. So, he’s stuck with a focus on what’s most dramatically ingrained in the long term side.
He was later diagnosed with a type of OCD, with respect to how he relates his memory; combined with this dialog, it intensifies as it progresses and even though the dialogs are only cyclic and don’t last.
Physiological into Psychological:
It would seem that when He experiences something physiological such as an example; stomach pain, that originates from his physical sensations, He cannot relate or describe this discomfort accurately and his reaction is to form a direct connection to his memories. This pain is met with his anger, in rebellion against the sensation, as though the past experiences are the source of his present discomfort. He externalizes the source of that pain he experiences with his body, as though it was “caused” by the characters with vivid imagination, coming from his memories.
When his emotions rise up, this evokes his memories of his experiences with the kids he didn't like from his past, they become personifications of the senses. Anger is not the only emotion involved. Yet, with anger, the resulting dialog becomes a type of self sustaining focused rage; he shows no awareness of the fact that it all comes from something he is experiencing physically in his body.
From experience, I can say that Vaccines adversely alter our natural manner in which we relate to our body. The nerves are an important grounding for our five senses, if the damage to them starts early enough, the resulting "imbalance" becomes a form of baked in balance, the body can normalize.
There are many ways to describe WHY vaccines should be banned, the best way is to point to a personal experience.
The idea that there are laws that codified this form of torture, is what galvanizes my determination that "Government" should also be Banned.
I am very sorry. I hate what has been done to our children.
You speak truth, painful truth for you, your son, and your family.
This coercive nature of the Government-Pharma mafia inflicting unnatural and harmful "vaccines" and "therapies" on newborns and the rest of us is being overlooked by too many.
Many blessings to you and your testimony.
Also, another important point to discuss is why the medical establishment tells us that sick, infirmed, and otherwise vulnerable people with immature or stressed immunity should be injected with system-disturbing so-called "vaccines."
The alleged immunity shots are hard on our physiologies, so it would stand to reason that only older, healthy, and robust people could tolerate them with minimal side-effects. Instead, they tell us that especially the weak among us should be shot up with their toxic brews.
Whether their agenda is one of health or disability and death answers itself.
May God help your son and you and your family.
Until then, sue the hell out of the pharm team if you can.
nefahotep, thanks for this powerful account. i have a relative who suffers much like your son has. the connection between ptsd and physical discomfort seems like a deep one which we should explore
Conscientious observation, care and compassion for those who suffer from the ill effects of vaccines, will be the best way forward. At times this may be very difficult.
Society at large now has an opportunity to reject vaccines out of hand. If that can happen, the future will be far healthier for generations to come.
dealing with a seriously vax-damaged child is brutally difficult, i've seen it over and over again. the amount of patience that it requires is staggering because of the endless cycle of behavioral issues.
guessing that those behind current power structures will try to lure us into mrna poison hell by switching out the vaccines for gene therapy. lots of damaged desperate people will try anything to survive
Do not consent!
Do Not comply!
Bk in the UK I used to know a friend's child who is severely autistic (non verbal). She attended specialist day schools and then was looked after at home till when the parents became concerned about their ability to care for her at home as they got old and the child became physically strong and more active than the parents. She is now in residential care. the parents visit her regularly. (Finding a suitable placement for her is another story. She changed her placement a few times plus funding issues) Her mum (friend ) said to me once "it looks like the child's brain is jammed". She displays repetitive behaviour as well (can be interpreted as OCD and can be quite destructive) and it was felt the way she was functioning came from the cerebellum part of her brain (which I understand coordinates and regulates things like behaviour and memorising.) Of course NHS psychiatrists wouldn't dare touch the root cause. At one point, she was intensively screaming and head banging. The docs would just hospitalise her and give her sedative pills (to shut her up) and useless and endless psychology assessments to monitor the progress.
This friend has heard of the vaccine hypothesis (as well as some other suspected causes for autism)but her response is like, 'there's no way to reverse the child condition and I just wanna focus on her care and present need'. I wished she had had more ability to dig in as she could have warned other parents. And We have been also hypnotised and told to not interfere with medical doctors' decisions (as they are well trained and know better and are given so much power by the govt and the health care structure)
Now the UK sees the rise in children on disability benefits. I wonder why.......
The jabs give the people OCD (the real pandemic) so easier to brainwash.
Some people have had a difficult time connecting "injections" to such outward behavior as seen in Autism and OCD. This is largely because the majority of people who could make a difference, who hold some of the control levers of the medical system, have only been able to get there due to their "programing." I'm sure in the UK there's varying degrees of internal opposition to vaccine schedules.
The sense that I have is; Autism and other afflictions, are there by Design, as an intended feature. The result is ever more people who are adults will need additional care, they won't be Independent. Also, the thing that happens to families, having to provide intensive care, creates a giant attention sucking distraction; this greatly reduces our ability to "respond" to ever more trains of abuse from the Administrative State.
Disability is an advantage to the Globalists Parasites who have created most of this mess.
I'm very sorry to hear of your friend's condition, like your friend, we will likely need to find some type of remedial care, for my son.
Blessings to you and your friend 🙏
It is a worry for any parents of children with special needs. I hope you will be able to find adequate remedial care for your son and well trained helpers. In the US, my understanding is in the pre cvd, blue states would more likely provide better support for SEN kids. But since the cvd, the dynamic seems.to have changed? An acquaintance in the US had a worker who wasn't well trained and was stepping over the boundaries.
Yes, globalists' plan to cause setbacks and reduce the population. no matter how hard some folks sugar coat the conditions (like they are indigo and crystal children sent to rescue the humanity), given the level of care the immediate families have to provide. The above UK friend has an older child (with no SEN) became bulimic when she was in her mid 20's. She was demanding more attention from her parents (as her parents are more attentive to the autistic daughter's needs). Also food seems like an issue for many of autistic children. (I used to work with a disabled children's team).
Take good care of yourselves. May you be guided to a right solution.
"Autism and other afflictions, are there by Design, as an intended feature."
Every state legislator should know your testimony, Nefahotep. I've given up on Congress because each member of Congress serves BlackRock Investments in order to fund their campaigns. But it wouldn't hurt if every member of Congress knew your testimony as well.
Repeal all State of Emergency law in the several States!
Most of this legislation arose after 2000. We got along without it fine before 2000. We were greatly damaged by it in 2020.
Thank you for your testimony. My prayers and blessings to you and your son.
"The argument that should be brought forward is that "public health" is not health. Health is an individual phenomenon, it's always subject-specific."
🎯🎯🎯
been saying this since 2020
"Whatever else you do, please, never allow yourself or anyone you care about to receive a product labelled as a 'vaccine'.
The entire field is fraud and a long planned method for injuring & killing people. Of this I am sure. It sounds diabolical, doesn’t it? That’s because it’s precisely that.
There’s a long history that led us trusting humans to this day. Until you learn the horrifying details, protect yourself and those close to you."
Dr. Mike Yeadon
--from
https://substack.com/@drmikeyeadon/note/c-77976595
btw its the 61st anniversary of JFK's assasination
John F. Kennedy's Fight to Stop WW3 and America's Tragic Slide into Empire - 60th Anniversary (written 1yr ago)
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/john-f-kennedys-fight-to-stop-ww3-79a
“Public Health is not health…” this absolutely the key thing. Thinking and planning in terms of ‘Public Health’ leads to the demise of the individual-centric doctor-patient relationship which should always be at the heart of the physician’s work because every patient is an individual and is different in his/her needs.
For me public = the collective = the group, and you cannot diagnose or treat the collective because it is an abstraction, it does not exist in a medical sense, only the individual exists.
A good start would be to stop using the term ‘public health’. Call it ‘Individual Health’ to better convey what health is about. Just that one simple action might reset the way people think about healthcare in a positive way.
When I think of “public health,” I think of proper sanitation, like sewer systems, clean water and the like. Much of infectious disease in history was diminished by proper sanitation and clean water rather than any vaccine. Think about how the Black Death was diminished when the population of rats in cities was controlled.
Thank you for your fair and constructive critique of my proposal for a vaccine moratorium. I agree in lieu of clinical trials that existing databases could be used to construct large cohorts for comparison of vaxxed vs unvaxxed kids. You mention 11+ such databases. The VSD would seem to be useful in this regard - what others should RFK, Jr. and his team incorporate into such an analysis?
Thank you! I don't remember all databases off the top of my head, but there is Medicaid data (overvaxxed children of the poor), there is VA data, there are of course datasets from the FDA clinical trials, and many health outcomes datasets now. There should be a massive shakedown at the HHS to get them to cough up everything. And yes, that's the best way, just run a retrospective analysis of these data, because vax schedule has been increasing over time, so we could see what happened when there were few vaccines, low % uptake and what happened after more and more shots were added. The states can be compared, the ones that are totally vax-nazis (CA) vs the ones that have exemptions. All sorts of things can be designed.
It would be nice to make Pfizer et al. pay for those studies without assigning their own team, of course.
And on top of it,make them be the trial people and see how much they would like that
That's an awesome idea! Put your body where your mouth is...
Informed consent, in the context of medical treatment or medical research, transcends the unspoken ethical responsibilities of the patient-physician relationship. It is, in fact, a legal obligation.
Seen from the legal perspective, informed consent in a medical setting entails the bodily integrity of the individual patient or research subject. It is grounded in the idea of an individual’s personal autonomy—that is, their capacity for self‐determination and self‐governance.
What this means in practice is that a patient or research subject must be given sufficient information about any and all pending treatments, including the risks and benefits of those treatments, the existence and availability of any alternative treatments, the patient’s role in treatment, and the patient’s right to refuse treatment.
The problem we currently have is that informed consent in the current climate is virtually impossible due to the iron wall of Pharma control over the information flow and their front line soldiers aka pediatricians/doctors who stand in the way of anything resembling informed consent and actively work to deceive the public and do so in order to receive the fat kickbacks.
What is regularly portrayed as a medical issue or a knowledge issue is in fact, as is the case with most things, a political issue and until the forces that control the political landscape are overturned one can expect business as usual.
"Unavoidably unsafe". You got that right. Makes me nuts when people say the "vaccine" is safe or JFK jr. is going to make vaccines "safe". ERRR!
Watch out for neshewat
I never heard of this nominee for US Surgeon General before, but, when she was nominated, I heard someone comment that she, at some point in time, told people to mask up and get your vaccine. If she did say this in the past, I hope that she realized her error and has since educated herself. I hope she is no longer on that track. I so wish that Dr. Ladapo, Surgeon General in FL, would have been nominated as US Surgeon General.
The problem is that various vaccine sceptics are captured at different points in the vaccine science spectrum. After trans-generational brainwashing, it is difficult to rise above that spectrum, have an objective outlook of the whole landscape and start rejecting even fundamental terminology deeply etched into our brains.
Sasha, I agree with you 100% here. Thank you for emphasizing that children are not lab rats. But even conducing vaccine trial on lab rats would be unwarranted at this point.
Thank you amazing Sasha for all you do.
Sasha, the answer to all this back and forth is simple, it is this simple logical scientific conclusion the psychopaths will never see, that their business model is built on a lie, a lie that is easily exposed through practical observation happening in real time over decades. This brings the parasites who propagate this hoax and deprive there enormous $ from the propagation of this lie to use language to say that no is yes.
The entire foundation and application of vaccines is a total lie, a ruthless fantasy that is used to enslave and enrich the psychopaths who worship it for entirely selfish sadistic reasons.
You do amazing work and have the mind and spirit of a true warrior.
Take care Sasha.
Great ideas. I would be interested in understanding how MD's could be accountable for their lack of TRUE informed consent which is happening now. Pediatricians hold tremendous power over newborn parents who trust them implicitly. Unless there are severe penalties for not providing accurate and thorough informed consent pediatricians will continue to convince parents that vaccines are "safe and effective". There needs to be a major public educational initiative that will help inform everyone of vaccines true risks and benefits.
Physicians were told lies by the FDA and CDC about the safety and efficacy of the COVID jabs (non-vaccines). They accepted these lies because years of “education” taught them about the benefits of vaccines. So, I can understand why they were administering them to their patients and received the jabs themselves early on. But it didn’t take long for the reports of adverse events to start coming out that should have led them to question their safety, even though the CDC tried to tell them these adverse events occurred more with infection than with the jab. It should be clear to all of them by now that these jabs are not safe and do not decrease the risk of hospitalization or death from the infection. My first instinct not to take the jab is that I knew that they were developed and/or tested using cell cultures derived from the tissue harvesting from healthy babies during elective abortions (kidney and retina). But that’s another story.
I needed this dose of sanity today. Continued gratitude, just have to love Sasha L.
Pediatricians should be very scared. As well as pharmacists. AND veterinarians! Talk about a population that can't give consent.
Superb response to Mr Edward Geehr's proposals. I (unfortunately) was once on the "Informed Consent" bandwagon. After reading a few thousand reader comments, I became convinced that informed consent presumes the consenter has some modest level of cognitive skill. Erm...
'Vaccine' experiments on children, regardless of regulation, parental consent, or other excuse, is a crime against Nature. In my opinion, if the intended "vaccination" utilizes modified genetic materials of any kind, it is genetic assault (rape) manslaughter, or premeditated murder.
When will medical professionals actually *discern* the differences between Medicines and poisons?
👏 👏 🎯
Here I'd say that most of clinical pharmacology is the (hopefully) judicious use of synthetic chemicals and poisons to achieve a therapeutic response. Though many / most are wrongly prescribed I still think that there are legitimate "exceptional" uses for some of these in modern medical and surgical practice. If it is implied by some that there is no possible way to perform an ethical clinical trial on children then I would have to disagree. My own pharmaceutical nihilism yields before I could forsake a desperately ill child. However, no matter how desperate the case , the strictest adherence to informed consent and ethical intent must be maintained. Otherwise, predatory research practices will be a threat.
The judicious use of pharmaceutical products disappeared when clinical medicine became a business enterprise. The modern medical system is a complete fraud.
> it is not ethical to then propose to remedy this by a human-subject protected clinical trial, especially in children who cannot legally consent. And there is no scientific "equivalent" that can establish safety of something known to be toxic.
Is your point:
1. Vaccine experiments on children are unethical because children can't consent, or
2. Vaccine experiments on children are unethical because children can't consent and there's sufficient correlational evidence that vaccines are toxic (or, more softly, that they likely have a large net negative effect)
?
If point 1, then how do you look at non-vaccine interventions on children?
If point 2, you know the common response will be that the evidence is too weak, and then the response to that is that pharma & government are either not looking for the evidence and/or suppressing it, but then that just looks like an unresolvable disagreement. One idea would be to require pharma & government gather better evidence with independent oversight, and run the studies on the data they already have comparing to non-vaxxed children (correlational but probably the best that can be done).
It's both 1 and 2. It is also important to understand that there is a difference between "knowingly" and "unknowingly" causing harm. Once someone knows vaccines are harmful (which all critics of vaccines do), they can't advocate for testing them to "get science", especially on children. If you kill someone because you didn't know it's a manslaughter. If you killed someone when you knew you could kill them - it's now a murder. If you designed an "experiment" in which you knew you could kill a child - it's a premeditated murder now.
Finally, the evidence is not weak. It is in fact overwhelming, but hidden and suppressed by the criminal cartel that masquerades as the HHS. So, the goal should be to get them to cough it up, not "test on more children for science".
Boom! Spot on. Thank you.
very good point. So they can't ever be tested, therefore can't be proven safe, therefore must be banned.
> Once someone knows vaccines are harmful (which all critics of vaccines do)
I imagine Siri is leaning that way but doesn't actually know, which does seem to be the most rational way to look at it. I agree it's unfair. Pharma and government have conspired and/or are incompetent and so we just have to go off hunches, but my point is not to question the spectrum of hunches (you = extremely high, Siri & co = medium), but how to convince the other side who's opinions are in the total opposite direction.
Siri doesn't know? oh, please!
If a "vaccine" is completely safe and has NO toxic ingredients then it will simply be processed out of your body in a few days. That is what the body is meant to do. Shots have to have toxic ingredients to make it stay in the body longer than a few days.
No, it won't be "processed". Injections of proteins create permanent damage - anaphylaxis. Even organic raw milk, if injected, can kill or create a permanent injury (lactose intolerance for life, which is not "minor" issue). This was known since 1913, a Nobel Prize was awarded for this piece of science.
Read this, please.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-second-shot-or-what-do-vaccinators?r=uaapz
Read Sasha's recent posts on anaphylaxis and you will change your mind on this.
It is also not ethical to propose more clinical trials when real world data like Steve Kirsch's polls already show the harms from vaccines:
The data is clear: the more vaccines you give your child, the more likely it is that they will develop chronic diseases including autism (May 2023)
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-data-is-clear-the-more-vaccines
ADHD: 7x
Autoimmune disorders: 21x
Autism: 5x
Asthma: 9.3x
Epilepsy: 4x
Sinusitis: 33x
Survey indicates sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender dysphoria are all primarily caused by vaccination (May 2024)
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/survey-indicates-sexual-orientation
Sexual orientation: 4.78x
Gender identity: 4.81x
Gender dysphoria: 5.54x
exactly!!!
My gut is also highly skeptical of vaccines but a survey by Steve of his own audience seems like the most confounded study design that I can think of. I'm surprised you all consider this clear evidence.
I've read the Vax-Unvax book by Hooker & RFK and that's the strongest data I've seen but my point is how would pro-vaxx people be convinced? Clearly, 50 years of vaxx-skeptical people's arguments are not working, so that's why I was thinking about what could be proposed that's both ethical and strong evidence. The major hope right now seems to be RFK getting confirmed and getting at all the raw data of vaxxes vs unvaxxed.
I can see how one could automatically think that, but Steve's audience does contain a large number of anti-vax people who are all vaccinated and their kids too. Being anti- or pro- vax doesn't change whether a) you or your kids were vaccinated or b) one developed certain traits or illnesses later in life.
What about the time correlation of SIDS developing pre-wellness check vs. post-wellness check?
--
Former Omaha police detective reveals 50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours post vaccine
My 16-minute interview of Jennifer, a former police detective in a major US city who handled over 250 SIDS investigations over 7 years implicates the childhood vaccines are the major cause of SIDS.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/former-major-city-police-detective
The key points
3 to 4 cases per month, so over 250 cases total during her tenure
50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours of a vaccine administration. Assuming kids are vaccinated every month (which is the most conservative assumption), the chance of this happening by chance is 1.23e-64. This means the cases were caused by the vaccine since there is no other viable hypothesis that can explain the evidence.
70% of SIDS cases happened within 1 week of a vaccination.
Her pediatrician acknowledged this and didn’t argue with the data.
The American Academy of Pediatrics trains doctors on how to gaslight patients who suspect the vaccine caused their child’s death.
Jennifer declined to publicly reveal her name or the police department she worked for, but revealed this to me so I could verify everything using independent sources.
The police department declined to respond to my records count request because it is outside the scope of the state’s FOIA laws since it cannot be accomplished with a straightforward query and “research” would be required. I agree with their interpretation, but I’ve requested they comply anyway as a matter of public benefit. I will update this article when I hear back from them.
Dr. Paul Thomas' vaxed/unvaxed study of his pediatric patients is also impressive https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674
It was of course retracted by the powers that be but I think it's the only study of its kind.
As for convincing the pro vaxers, it's impossible as long as the media keeps providing its impenetrable wall of lies.
I'm 58 years old (born and lived in Hungary until I was 21), have three grown children between the ages of 23 and 28, who were born in NJ.
I has always wondered what was the reason to give an ever increasing number of vaccines for my children. Between my first, second and third child, I saw the shots dramatically increased. The number of shots my newborns received between 1996 (my first born), and the shots my third child received in 2001 increased from one to four. I was horrified as I watched it dazed after giving birth naturally, as my newborn son got 4 shots into his heals - 2 in each. The nurse brought in papers to sign the consent form. Nothing was explained. My gut feeling was that those shots were not needed for my child, but I thought, at least, the shots would not do harm, otherwise the doctors would not allowe it.
More and more shots were happening especially during the first 18 months of my children's life. I could not understand why my children had to have these shots in the first place? They were very healthy otherwise, unlike many other children around us - absolutely no developmental illnesses, no allergies, no chronic diseases, rare occasions of minor common cold infections. The pediatrician kept asking me what I did to keep them so healthy. Yet, we kept going for the well checkups and he kept giving them those vaccine. I never liked the idea of vaccination, though. What happened in the last couple of decades in America, I was wondering to myself often. We did have these many shots as children... I was born and raised in Hungary and received no immunization shots except the oral polio drops (by now, I know how dangerous that one was as well!) and a TB shot, when I was around 7-8 years old, because my grandfather had TB. I naturally caught Chicken pox as a 6 year old, and have vivid memories of having itching dry scabs. I had Mumps when I was 11. There were other children around me, who had Rubeola, but I never got that, strangely. Most of the children in my small town located next to the Austrian border (18K people), had some of those infections, but not one had them all. Even as a child, I was wondering, why I did not get Rubeola in spite of never isolating myself from my best friend, who came down with it, for instance. Yet, I got Mumps, but never had any close contact with anyone I knew, who had it. I heard that there were a few other children in town, who came down with it. Not not one person I knew (or heard of ) who had any complications from these childhood viral infections for those 21 years I lived in that town. (...and believe me, the news spread there faster than today, because everyone had at least a cursory knowledge of everybody else... people had spent a lot more time being together and talking to each other back then!) Even as a child, I had the feeling that these communicable illnesses spread in a "mysterious way" and each of us were perhaps exposed, yet responded differently to the viruses. For instance, my 2 years younger brother had contracted none of these childhood illnesses (!), while I was sick next to him with Chicken Pox and Mumps!
My daughter came down with a viral meningitis, when she was 11, immediately following one of her immunization shots. First, she developed fever (of which, I was not much alarmed, initially), but she could not shake it off, and after 10 days, her fever got out of control, plus she developed severe head and neck aches. I rushed her to the emergency room and after two days waiting for the spinal tab result, she was diagnosed with viral meningitis. She was extremely ill, she spent about 3 weeks in the hospital and took her 6 more weeks to recover, yet never recovered to be her healthy self as she was before. I kept telling the doctors that the immunization shot gave her the meningitis, but they said it was no such thing and treated me with a smug attitude. At that time, in 2007, I did not know about VAERS and I'm 100% sure that no doctor reported my daughter's case to VAERS either. I only learned through covid years that yes, meningitis is a well known side effect of childhood vaccination! I wish I could just go and remind that pediatrician about that now!
I got no support from the doctors about my suspicion that the meningitis was a side effect of the vaccination, however from that point on, I started seriously doubt the safety of childhood immunization and even the need for it. I felt traumatized each time my children got another vaccine worrying about what would happen to them. I remember to keep asking if the shots were needed? Can we not take them, I kept asking. I explained each time that I was worried about the side effects ever since my daughter's case... Yet, he kept telling me that according to the research the vaccines can never cause meningitis, and perhaps my daughter got the illness as a result of a secondary infection due to a common cold... (How? She was not ill with a cold, when she got the vaccine? ... I was thinking), and yes, vaccination scheduled is required (!) for school. Of course, none of it was true. Also, through covid I learned that those shots were not mandatory for school. NJ grants religious exemption! Yet, my children's pediatrician lied to me for 2 decades with a straight face!
My children received all the "recommended" vaccines up until they were 18, including the dreadful HPV! I want to cry out loud just thinking about it, and have moments when I feel like to give a visit to their pediatrician, or at least send a letter to him enlightening him about the crimes that he committed against my children and the lies he told me... and remind him that he might be protected from humans' law, but he won't escape from the ultimate punishment.
Yes, I have become an anti-vaxxer in the last four years, and proudly carry the title. My only hope of redemption for my ignorance is that my grandchildren will have a chance to avoid these terrible poisons and human experimentations. My oldest one, my daughter, is 28 years old now and planning to have children soon. She promised, my grandchildren won't get any vaccines!
Kirsch brings up good points and bad points. He became a cheap sensationalist who does not shy away from any BS that promotes his agenda (with which I agree in general) and has never ever corrected himself. So you need to be very careful with his arguments and never never take Steve's claim at its face value.
https://open.substack.com/pub/klim/p/response-to-kirschs-most-important
Alzheimer's and Parkinson's
Anybody who follows Bigtree and Siri knows their stance perfectly. It’s a question of subtle “political” nuances if you expect/wish to be heard and make a difference. You can either want a revolution or diplomacy.....the result will probably be the same any which way you go.....
The whole innate versus acquired immunity is a real quandary. Some are so convinced of it and in such detail . If they are wrong , what on earth have they been 'researching' all these years. :( :( . Is there really no pre-priming from exposure ?? I told people as long as they had had lots of colds they'd gotten over theyd probably be ok with covid. It was a non threatening argument against jabs at least.
Added to jab tyranny we had mask tyranny tho which I think did a hell of a lot of harm. I considered it to be about organising people rather than health but I knew airlessness and dank masks was a bad idea healthwise. BTw Is it true that caucasians respire partly through our skin so we cant hold our breath so long ? I found it odd that despite having larger lungs and fresher air than average, and a good ability to freedive underwater.. I'm not able to cope with a mask for more than a few minutes.
The thought of these old folks and children being both jabbed and masked is a horror :(
Hi Sasha...I'm in with you 100%. I just a day or two ago wrote much the same thing regarding the vaccination schedules in Canada...to the CCCA. The Canadian Covid Care Alliance is gathering information (FOIA) from the government (like pulling teeth from a live Javelina) to provide public justification for revamping the entire "health care" (death care) in Canada. Still in the fight Sasha, and making progress, thanks to you. A rhetorical question...(triggered by Yountville Cross)....should not all wine making cease immediately due to "global warming"? As I understand the process...17 bottles of CO2 are produced along with every bottle of vino...if the occasional cow fart is ruining the planet, why is wine still being produced...(I am being facetious...I have not bought into the Clinton/Gore/Schwabb climate fraud.) Is it true that most "eugenicists" love their wine, while the "useless eaters/deplorables" get fluoride in their water instead? LET'S WEIGH THAT ON THE SCALE...our menu is bugs and flouride, and the folks that are mandating us to death WITH "VACCINES" use wine and Kobe...and stem cells from aborted baby humans.