Turns out they have developed "a technology capable of providing immediate and long-term solutions to coronavirus infections."

By developing a technology capable of destroying immune systems and killing people, who, once sickened, can no longer fight off coronavirus or any other infections, and once dead, are no longer subject to coronavirus infections -- or any other infections -- at all.

They found the "cure" for the common cold: mass murder.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

It seems to me the perps never thought anyone would figure out the extremely complex machinations they employed. You and Katherine Watt have uncovered their perfidy. It is so convoluted and evil that it is almost unspeakable/indescribable, even for those of us who understand the big picture (which clearly works to their advantage).

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

The more both you and Katherine Watt dig, the more I come to the same conclusion that they are indeed implinenting Jaques Attali's 1981 suggestion of depopulation creating fear through a pandemic of low threat to get people to line up for the cure (which is poison)... A slow acting genetic poison, that will manifest in so many varieties of disease and systemic attacks as time wears on that there will be plausible deniability.

In hidden contracts that obfuscate the true nature of this crime, which you are exposing left right and centre... Thank God for warriors like you Sasha.

Some of the almost movie like villan characters are all circulating around the WEF, WHO and associated organisations (that have innocuous names Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission... That hide their true aims it seems).

Jaques Attali has been a lauded guest of the WEF as has celebrated academic, Yuval Noah Harari...

Yuval Noah Harari assured them (the elites) that humans can be controlled via the narrative, via fiction, as long as everyone believes the same story, we all co-operate (even in lining up for poison). Yuval talking about the above reference here:


So who wouldn't believe their story? They silenced opposition, controlled the narrative, everyone seemed on board.

Secret DoD contracts assured safety to the elites and their corporation it seems.

Due to studying biology briefly at uni the mere suggestion of mRNA was a big WTF?

Dr Paul Alexander's post today about the risks of nonaparticles in medicine, especially in reproductive health was another big WTF??


Banning the relatively safe ivermectin in Australia was a huge WTF??

(That day I knew something big and super strange was going down... I can't quite convey just how scary that day was for me, with the news suddenly blaring horse dewormer, such obvious propaganda... Felt like the country had been invaded..)

I was fully onboard with the whole covid story, until radical genetic engineering was put forward as the "only" solution, then the friendly coercion (win money etc) then the hard stick, take it or lose your job etc. I could go on, but I think most people here witnessed this heavy enforcement of experimental, obviously deadly and dangerous stuff that you simply MUST take (although if you're injured it was your choice)...

As I said sci fi movie...

People died, but no talk of immediately suspending its use, even worse they kept saying "safe and effective" over and over like robots, when it was obviously not safe and effective...

I fricking red pilled about then...

I think, if it's indeed more than bad medicine and stupidity, and more like depopulation... With what I knew about the delicate subtleties of mRNA, it's essential contribution to cellular health in a tight relationship between your own nuclear DNA and bodily functions. I thought that in 5 to 7 years we'd see an explosion of death / cancer / autoimmunity / bodily systematic collapse / a multitude of unknown and unknowable ills ... AND I think (if it's depopulation they/elites were after) they thought the same as me... and like me, are STUNNED a lot of the death and incapacitation has been immediate and so BIG they do not know what to do, so they are currently ignoring it, working on a narrative shift to explain it all you can bet.

Their plan has come slightly undone ... They thought they could dupe the world, so you'd all be begging for their "cure", and we'd all die a few years down the track, at staggered intervals, of so many various ills, they would have plausible deniability... but so many have seen the injuries and deaths (and personally know someone, as we know VAERS, DAEN, UK Yellow Card etc are just the tip of the iceberg) that now, the refusers are glad they stood strong, the coerced are angry, and even the willing feel duped...

A few are still in the daydream, but if they get the info we've seen... They will be furious too... Let's hope we are close to a watershed moment...

Of course the asleep NEED to know this has happened and is happening...

I try my best to share the articles I find, but mainly amoreaxhing to the converted... So many are asleep and still think the mainstream news is their friend, and the news will tell them if there's a problem...

These contracts should be front page news everywhere, but aren't... This is how I've come to the slow conclusion they are trying to kill us, immediately or slowly...

Everything from the mRNA, possible rogue miRNA, the nanoparticles, the damn spike itself, other dubious ingredients it's definitely NOT a vaccine... It's a genetic biochemical nano weapon... Bioweapon is almost underselling the multiple components of this poison.

Thank you so much for all you do Sasha, one of the true heroes of humanity.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

I posted your work on truth-social, and GETTR. Now I should go skiing before things warm up. ⛷️

Expand full comment

Do you think other big Pharma brands are also in this scheme ?

Expand full comment

"agrees that Pfizer's efforts to develop and manufacture a vaccine intended to prevent COVID-19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 are aspirational in nature"

"Dangerous Aspirations"..... That could be a book title. I'm gonna go get a blood test and make sure somebody didn't slip some acid in my Pop Tarts....

"Pfizer STILL is the agency that committed the fraud, where the FDA and DOD have set Pfizer up to take the fall, even though all three were apparently in on it."

I have been wondering for many months if this deal had a built in parachute from the beginning. Maybe an array of shell companies woven into the mix from the beginning. Hide the profits and assets in the shell companies and let Pfizer fall into the pit.

You can afford it when you are wallowing around in the pile of cash generated from a multi trillion dollar scam.

Expand full comment

Thank you Sasha.. keep it up.. more and more incriminating evidence for Nuremberg..

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

Sasha - learning to read the fine print thanks to you. Some semantic observations:

"capable of providing protection against the SARS-CoV-2 threat and related coronaviruses, subject to technical, clinical and regulatory success."

"capable of" does not imply success. maybe some of the vials actually work, if not, fine, they're just "capable." also funny how words like "preventing" or "curing" or "healing" are nowhere to be found. just "success" which i guess means they managed to brew up a bunch of stuff and put it in vials.

"unprecedented threats to several components of the prototype project" - this sounds to me like people might be upset if they knew what several components of the bioweapon were. and how is "threat" defined? notice how covid was not defined as a virus but a "threat." does this wording therefore justify a lethal weapon against such a "threat?"

"assuming the clinical data supports such application for approval or authorization." approval and authorization are two different things. EUA = authorization. approval requires very specific steps by the FDA.

this time i resisted the urge to scroll straight down to see today's painting - so beautiful

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023·edited Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

Anyone else see this one??? The Pediatricians are still at it. This happened not far from where I live. https://billricejr.substack.com/p/children-allegedly-vaccinated-without

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

I think when the average American thinks of an FDA approved drug they are not thinking in terms of all this exceptionalism and voodoo studies with 8 mice. I think they are thinking of real studies, real human or animal subjects of substantial number, real scientists, legit from A to Z. So, if all this subterfuge should come out, I think the FDA might as well sink the ship.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

Thank you for your work and passion. ❤️

Expand full comment

There's so much limited liability in these contracts that yes, there's almost no contract or agreement at all.

Expand full comment

Hopefully, we can all learn something from the following Bible passage:

Genesis 6:5-8 KJV

[5] And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. [6] And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. [7] And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. [8] But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.

There is still hope! Praise the Lord!

Expand full comment
Mar 8, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

Sasha & Katherine have blown the doors off this thing. Isn't it funny not 60 days after they release this information in digestible format - they roll out the lab leak story. It's so disappointing to see people pursue that when the real story is right here.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova

Excellent work once again. If your government is going to contract with an outside party, in this case "Prizer", to develop and deliver a substance capable of murdering humans, it would seem to me that ALL parties involved are equally culpable (there's that good old "equality" thing again that government harps on all the time) and none are exempt for any reason. Attempted murder is just that as well as actual murder being just that. The government does not get to commit murder on its citizens and say it is something else.

I can see it now how it will go with "Prizer" taking the fall. A fine of perhaps $500 million, likely distributed into the pockets of the DOD, HHS, FDA, CDC and others. A new "contract" to deliver another 500 million doses of mRNA poisons for the next invented pandemic (worth several $billions) and absolutely no one even going to jail or prison. This isn't Russia where Putin is going ahead with the "offing" with NO trials of 130 scientists involved as criminals in this vaccine farce, or so I hear.

Expand full comment

Hi Sasha,

I don't quite agree with your take on the wording of the various parts of the Statement Of Work, because I think the expectation of getting a properly approved product by way of properly conducted and properly reported clinical trials is unmistakably stated in clear language.

The clincher of absurdity for me, as you quoted me saying (Thanks), is the "Limitation of Liability" section, which seems to contradict (thus counteract) all that language of clearly stated expectations, making the whole thing a joke. I cannot fathom any serious agreement ever allowing the parties to agree not to take the agreement seriously, as part of the agreement. "We agree not to take our agreement seriously." It's like saying, "You can't believe anything I say." Such a saying is illegitimate -- it has no use or function -- it has no operational capacity in human dealings -- it is self contradictory in such a circular way that it leads nowhere -- it has no traction that enables human beings to understand it or act in accordance to it.

As I read it, the whole Statement Of Work reduces to the same sort of beast. All the right words are there in the beginning and throughout most of the document, and it pretty much reads legitimately for me, but then you get to that Section 11.6, and it all goes to clown world.

Given its two faced nature, therefore, if Pfizer can argue based on the clown-face side of it, then a lawyer can argue based on the serious-face side of it, and a judge can rule on the serious-face side of it.

Expand full comment