Turns out they have developed "a technology capable of providing immediate and long-term solutions to coronavirus infections."
By developing a technology capable of destroying immune systems and killing people, who, once sickened, can no longer fight off coronavirus or any other infections, and once dead, are no longer subject to coronavirus infections -- or any other infections -- at all.
They found the "cure" for the common cold: mass murder.
What this is a "solution" to has nothing to do with an ultimately tolerable virus. It has to do with a longstanding attitude on the part of the uber-rich that there are far too many dirty, annoying "lowlifes" in the world.
Are you so sure we didn't finance the nazis in the hope that they would uh, destroy the russians? The war in the west from start to finish was kinda "lame" compared to that in the east. Look at the casualty numbers. Who really won the war?
My thinking exactly. Read all the "efficacy"/"effectiveness" claims in the same light, and see how everything clicks into place.
Not to brag about it, but I've been saying this loud and clear for two years now (on my blog). I had already learned their language straight from their forked tongues prior to this, back in 2001.
Well, it's more of a "cure" for the multiple conflicting claims on real wealth, just ahead of assigning losses when the $US financial regime collapses. The Fed is trying to make the collapse happen in the EU first. They may well succeed. After that, in the chaos, events become unpredictable.
I will present an elegant thought which came to me.
This is a war crime of mass genocide, with these bioweapons and "countermeasure-prototypes", which happen to cause immunodeficiency... That leads to slow death from unusual causes, as we will recall from AIDS.
This appears to have been actively facilitated at the highest levels of global governance and finance and military, as well as facilitated at all operational levels below that, with "need-to-know-basis" of information-sharing, and multiple false-explanations, shared in various information-silos. Some knew most of it. It looks like Tony Fauci was that high-level of an operative, and had been for decades.
Many knew less, or could entertain some comfortable fiction or another, while their bread got buttered on this side, and risks of butter-shortage in the future got "externalized" onto billions of mere mortals. The "risks" in this case are the certainty that notional wealth exceeds physical wealth in our world by a factor of at least 10X, even without "derivatives". The "risk" is the certainty that some time soon, losses will need to be "assigned". They can most easily be assigned to the dead. They can also be assigned to those who are terrified into willing-compliance, such as might be the case for those getting e-money when they suddenly find they have no way to pay rent or bills, nor fill their gas tank.
Other categories of human would be more troublesome in pressing their claims to Social Security, their 401k, and so on.
Assigning losses, which constitute 90% of notional wealth will be a very hard political needle to thread. Those who now control the levers of wealth and power need to have already established a mechanism of firm control before the next western global financial crisis.
What if financial losses were assigned first to all those who had been instrumental or complicit in the bioweapon-war-crimes "solution" to serve current power elites and help sustain them in their positions of power.
"You conspired to kill billions of people without leaving fingerprints. You are given the choice of your-money-or-your-life. If you choose to live, you will receive your Social Security and Medicare benefits, but will relinquish all other claims on wealth. What do you choose, Mr. Gates, Dr. Fauci?"
As you see, even family fortunes would be subject to this particular test, and corporate fortunes.
It has a poetic-justice element, as well. Hell, SOMEBODY has to accept massive losses, why not those "most-deserving" first?
Now that I think about it, almost everyone believes the immune system exists only to fight infections, but it actually reacts to anything, even to inert stuff.
Anything from the exterior that reaches a place that it must not reach, will be annihilated by our God given immune system.
So, destroying it is even worse than if our only problem were infections of any kind, real or not.
Pollens, dander, etc. become worse than "inert". These "vaccines" and their adjuvants hijack the immune system, causing deleterious reaction to what it should consider inert.
Your "sanitation workers". I meant the collateral damage from the immune system attacking anything. Vaccines with adjuvants cause it to attack otherwise inert things. I consider that damage "flack". Worse if it's you; i.e. autoimmunity. No, I didn't mean to suggest Ghouly Annie. (The sot creep who despoiled the WTC forensic evidence and cemented Trump's 2020 loss.)
I caught covid from a mycoplasma in the garbage, did I? Perhaps some Rockefeller mineral oil labeled as watersnake oil would have fixed it. Still a lubricant to grease out-fection!
Ain't it the truth? That seems to be the attitude of the medical establishment now. We're all lab rats. I have avoided being jabbed so far. I hope I can avoid it going forward.
It seems to me the perps never thought anyone would figure out the extremely complex machinations they employed. You and Katherine Watt have uncovered their perfidy. It is so convoluted and evil that it is almost unspeakable/indescribable, even for those of us who understand the big picture (which clearly works to their advantage).
The more both you and Katherine Watt dig, the more I come to the same conclusion that they are indeed implinenting Jaques Attali's 1981 suggestion of depopulation creating fear through a pandemic of low threat to get people to line up for the cure (which is poison)... A slow acting genetic poison, that will manifest in so many varieties of disease and systemic attacks as time wears on that there will be plausible deniability.
In hidden contracts that obfuscate the true nature of this crime, which you are exposing left right and centre... Thank God for warriors like you Sasha.
Some of the almost movie like villan characters are all circulating around the WEF, WHO and associated organisations (that have innocuous names Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission... That hide their true aims it seems).
Jaques Attali has been a lauded guest of the WEF as has celebrated academic, Yuval Noah Harari...
Yuval Noah Harari assured them (the elites) that humans can be controlled via the narrative, via fiction, as long as everyone believes the same story, we all co-operate (even in lining up for poison). Yuval talking about the above reference here:
Banning the relatively safe ivermectin in Australia was a huge WTF??
(That day I knew something big and super strange was going down... I can't quite convey just how scary that day was for me, with the news suddenly blaring horse dewormer, such obvious propaganda... Felt like the country had been invaded..)
I was fully onboard with the whole covid story, until radical genetic engineering was put forward as the "only" solution, then the friendly coercion (win money etc) then the hard stick, take it or lose your job etc. I could go on, but I think most people here witnessed this heavy enforcement of experimental, obviously deadly and dangerous stuff that you simply MUST take (although if you're injured it was your choice)...
As I said sci fi movie...
People died, but no talk of immediately suspending its use, even worse they kept saying "safe and effective" over and over like robots, when it was obviously not safe and effective...
I fricking red pilled about then...
I think, if it's indeed more than bad medicine and stupidity, and more like depopulation... With what I knew about the delicate subtleties of mRNA, it's essential contribution to cellular health in a tight relationship between your own nuclear DNA and bodily functions. I thought that in 5 to 7 years we'd see an explosion of death / cancer / autoimmunity / bodily systematic collapse / a multitude of unknown and unknowable ills ... AND I think (if it's depopulation they/elites were after) they thought the same as me... and like me, are STUNNED a lot of the death and incapacitation has been immediate and so BIG they do not know what to do, so they are currently ignoring it, working on a narrative shift to explain it all you can bet.
Their plan has come slightly undone ... They thought they could dupe the world, so you'd all be begging for their "cure", and we'd all die a few years down the track, at staggered intervals, of so many various ills, they would have plausible deniability... but so many have seen the injuries and deaths (and personally know someone, as we know VAERS, DAEN, UK Yellow Card etc are just the tip of the iceberg) that now, the refusers are glad they stood strong, the coerced are angry, and even the willing feel duped...
A few are still in the daydream, but if they get the info we've seen... They will be furious too... Let's hope we are close to a watershed moment...
Of course the asleep NEED to know this has happened and is happening...
I try my best to share the articles I find, but mainly amoreaxhing to the converted... So many are asleep and still think the mainstream news is their friend, and the news will tell them if there's a problem...
These contracts should be front page news everywhere, but aren't... This is how I've come to the slow conclusion they are trying to kill us, immediately or slowly...
Everything from the mRNA, possible rogue miRNA, the nanoparticles, the damn spike itself, other dubious ingredients it's definitely NOT a vaccine... It's a genetic biochemical nano weapon... Bioweapon is almost underselling the multiple components of this poison.
Thank you so much for all you do Sasha, one of the true heroes of humanity.
What you are saying ties in well with what Geoff Pain has been putting forward re endotoxins in the jab... His work is quite meticulous too... This might help with your own explorations into this ... Pfizer expected anaphylaxis due to this endotoxin content in their jabs too...
Exactly Rob... So much... Like you have been doing (for longer than me) I have now started listening to others, regarding previous vaccines and dangers of dubious ingredients within, including perhaps retroviruses contributing to all sorts of ills...
I'm currently reading your first article "Proteins, Spikes and Bio-weapons", thank you for the link, a great read so far!
I'm new to a lot of this but even Judy Mikovitt's (despite controversy and in fighting these days) paper on XMRVs contained in (previous to covid) shots is a disturbing read (much too late for me I've had enough of them to have many of these problems inside me... I wasn't a regular vaccinee ... But I flippantly got the flu jab in 2019 without a second thought... Thankfully I woke up and did not go near these bioweapons!
They have toxic ingredients that are somehow safe? That's nuts.
It wasn't until convid that I started to look deeper.
Check out the show the highwire. Aaron Siri https://aaronsiri.substack.com is their lawyer that has been doing great work in showing how there's insufficient safety and efficacy testing on all the vaccines!
If you want to go deeper into the murk around virology, check out this channel..
Thanks Rob, I have been a follower of Aaron Siri and The Highwire, I think they've done a lot to educate and update all of us, great job they do... Similarly I came across Sam Bailey, and have not read, but did buy her Virus Mania book (she was coauthor I think), even though some of it goes against what I learnt in uni, I like to take into account all positions on this subject, and I've enjoyed reading your first two WordPress articles today, thank you, very well written!! ... No matter how we approach all of this, we are on the same sides, have the same concerns... and we all can see the agenda at play (for what parts of the agenda we can deduce, can only imagine they have detailed plans, and we're just deciding phase one!). We can all see the poisons on offer, the potential beyond the death and destruction they have already wrought...
You're right (from WordPress articles) much of the science they "rediscover" was known at turn of last century ...
Now take Louis Pasteur, who apparently faked this research but for now let's take it at face value...
He did experiments with chicken cholera by dividing the chickens into two groups vaccinated and unvaccinated... Here's the important bit, he exposed both groups to chicken cholera... According to him, the unvaxxed chickens all died and the vaxxed chickens didn't... He repeated the experiment, same result...
What I'm looking at is the research design... Not bad...
Look at our vaccine research for covid vax, two groups of people vaccinated and unvaccinated and a large sample size at that, so far so good... BUT... Who was exposed to covid? We don't know... Pot luck...
Terrible research design and can't prove anything because we didn't control the variable we were researching, we didn't control who was exposed to covid... I do not care if it was ethical... There is zero proof it stops covid, of prevents illness or death, as we don't know who was exposed to covid... No claims can be made as the research design is a failure.
Pasteurs design was better than modern pharma...
Yet we mandated based on that crap research design.
Your article made me think of that! Thanks for the links Rob... All the best
Yes, i also think that they didn't intend for it to work so quickly. I think the narrative was beginning to fail as early as June 2021 and got worse that summer and they turned to the mandates and coercion as a reaction to that early fissure in the narrative.
yes, there are 300+ members of the MCDC consortium alone. The DOD captured the entire pharma industry through bullshit "biodefense" projects, truckloads of money, and vague requirements over the past 20 years.
Random question from link. Does anyone know Why the government abruptly shut down monoclonal antibodies (Regeneron)? they amended a contract for it in 2021.
Maybe because they worked? I don't know, I never reviewed the data for them. Most likely because they are a therapy and the government needs to inject everyone, so having a therapy available makes people less scared of "the virus" and less likely to line up for the needle.
According to Bryan Ardis monoclonal antibodies have been shown to help neutralize the effects of snake venom which Dr. Artis claims is a major component of the bioweapon shots. It is still not clear to me if he is talking about actual venom from real crate snakes or a synthesized pathogen based on the biological properties of snake venom. This would make more sense. How many real snakes are available to produce 12 billion shots? This distinction could be why Dr. Artis is having such a hard time convincing the world of his theory. Not real venom but an artificial product.
Antivenom drugs are monoclonal antibodies (it's a class of medicine, not a specific product). The problem is they have to be very specific to the specific venom, and even within the same class of snakes, eg. rattlesnakes - they have different venoms regionally. So it is not a great general approach, it may be not effective at all if you don't know what "bit" you.
"agrees that Pfizer's efforts to develop and manufacture a vaccine intended to prevent COVID-19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 are aspirational in nature"
"Dangerous Aspirations"..... That could be a book title. I'm gonna go get a blood test and make sure somebody didn't slip some acid in my Pop Tarts....
"Pfizer STILL is the agency that committed the fraud, where the FDA and DOD have set Pfizer up to take the fall, even though all three were apparently in on it."
I have been wondering for many months if this deal had a built in parachute from the beginning. Maybe an array of shell companies woven into the mix from the beginning. Hide the profits and assets in the shell companies and let Pfizer fall into the pit.
You can afford it when you are wallowing around in the pile of cash generated from a multi trillion dollar scam.
"You can afford it when you are wallowing around in the pile of cash generated from a multi trillion dollar scam." That and yer sugar daddies can create money at will with no adverse consequences to themselves.
Sasha - learning to read the fine print thanks to you. Some semantic observations:
"capable of providing protection against the SARS-CoV-2 threat and related coronaviruses, subject to technical, clinical and regulatory success."
"capable of" does not imply success. maybe some of the vials actually work, if not, fine, they're just "capable." also funny how words like "preventing" or "curing" or "healing" are nowhere to be found. just "success" which i guess means they managed to brew up a bunch of stuff and put it in vials.
"unprecedented threats to several components of the prototype project" - this sounds to me like people might be upset if they knew what several components of the bioweapon were. and how is "threat" defined? notice how covid was not defined as a virus but a "threat." does this wording therefore justify a lethal weapon against such a "threat?"
"assuming the clinical data supports such application for approval or authorization." approval and authorization are two different things. EUA = authorization. approval requires very specific steps by the FDA.
this time i resisted the urge to scroll straight down to see today's painting - so beautiful
I think when the average American thinks of an FDA approved drug they are not thinking in terms of all this exceptionalism and voodoo studies with 8 mice. I think they are thinking of real studies, real human or animal subjects of substantial number, real scientists, legit from A to Z. So, if all this subterfuge should come out, I think the FDA might as well sink the ship.
Hopefully, we can all learn something from the following Bible passage:
Genesis 6:5-8 KJV
[5] And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. [6] And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. [7] And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. [8] But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.
Sasha & Katherine have blown the doors off this thing. Isn't it funny not 60 days after they release this information in digestible format - they roll out the lab leak story. It's so disappointing to see people pursue that when the real story is right here.
Excellent work once again. If your government is going to contract with an outside party, in this case "Prizer", to develop and deliver a substance capable of murdering humans, it would seem to me that ALL parties involved are equally culpable (there's that good old "equality" thing again that government harps on all the time) and none are exempt for any reason. Attempted murder is just that as well as actual murder being just that. The government does not get to commit murder on its citizens and say it is something else.
I can see it now how it will go with "Prizer" taking the fall. A fine of perhaps $500 million, likely distributed into the pockets of the DOD, HHS, FDA, CDC and others. A new "contract" to deliver another 500 million doses of mRNA poisons for the next invented pandemic (worth several $billions) and absolutely no one even going to jail or prison. This isn't Russia where Putin is going ahead with the "offing" with NO trials of 130 scientists involved as criminals in this vaccine farce, or so I hear.
I don't quite agree with your take on the wording of the various parts of the Statement Of Work, because I think the expectation of getting a properly approved product by way of properly conducted and properly reported clinical trials is unmistakably stated in clear language.
The clincher of absurdity for me, as you quoted me saying (Thanks), is the "Limitation of Liability" section, which seems to contradict (thus counteract) all that language of clearly stated expectations, making the whole thing a joke. I cannot fathom any serious agreement ever allowing the parties to agree not to take the agreement seriously, as part of the agreement. "We agree not to take our agreement seriously." It's like saying, "You can't believe anything I say." Such a saying is illegitimate -- it has no use or function -- it has no operational capacity in human dealings -- it is self contradictory in such a circular way that it leads nowhere -- it has no traction that enables human beings to understand it or act in accordance to it.
As I read it, the whole Statement Of Work reduces to the same sort of beast. All the right words are there in the beginning and throughout most of the document, and it pretty much reads legitimately for me, but then you get to that Section 11.6, and it all goes to clown world.
Given its two faced nature, therefore, if Pfizer can argue based on the clown-face side of it, then a lawyer can argue based on the serious-face side of it, and a judge can rule on the serious-face side of it.
So how do you then reconcile the "expectation for properly conducted trials" with them being excluded from scope of the SOW, AND excluded from statutory requirements for countermeasures under PHE?
Just writing a promise to do something properly, when there are no hooks, no enforcement, no liability does not work. Also a contract is NOT the place/method to regulate clinical trial conduct.
It is inappropriate, because if the contracting parties agree to interpret something certain way, i.e. what Pfizer did, in the opinion of DOD was sufficient in the performance of the contract - then good luck.
I know everyone wants to go after pharmas on this. And we should. However, there is no legal requirement for them. The only thing that exists is that they made public statements advertising the product, the CEOs and executives did. In the UK they already got slap on the wrist for false claims, the CEO of Moderna was found making false claims about safety and efficacy. And absolutely NOTHING happened.
I just wrote another comment that might help answer your question.
Simply put, I do NOT interpret "out of scope" to mean what the Pfizer lawyers are saying. So I guess that means I do NOT agree that "out of scope" means what you are suggesting, which I think gives the Pfizer lawyers what they are looking for. I give them nothing here -- they are misinterpreting basic language in a specific context. Don't let them have that.
Your read is consistent with mine, as I'm understanding you.
So, like you, I get the sense that there is a level of risk here that has been improperly allowed, to tweak the technology and learn as they go, using the whole human race as subjects in their illegal experiment, which they sneakily try to redefine away as something else.
A prototype IS an experiment, regardless of what the heads of this snake are trying to fool people into believing. If all the elements of the process fit the definition of an experiment, then it is an experiment. Simply saying that it is not an experiment does not change this.
Turns out they have developed "a technology capable of providing immediate and long-term solutions to coronavirus infections."
By developing a technology capable of destroying immune systems and killing people, who, once sickened, can no longer fight off coronavirus or any other infections, and once dead, are no longer subject to coronavirus infections -- or any other infections -- at all.
They found the "cure" for the common cold: mass murder.
Well, it is a "solution", right? Reminds me of WWII and certain other solutions. Could the same forces be at play here? Yes, they could.
The final (final) solution. Evil of this magnitude is of Satanic origin. It is globally pervasive and extremely well-coordinated.
What this is a "solution" to has nothing to do with an ultimately tolerable virus. It has to do with a longstanding attitude on the part of the uber-rich that there are far too many dirty, annoying "lowlifes" in the world.
We didn't only get the Rocket Scientists like Von Braun after WW2 ENDED.
Are you so sure we didn't finance the nazis in the hope that they would uh, destroy the russians? The war in the west from start to finish was kinda "lame" compared to that in the east. Look at the casualty numbers. Who really won the war?
What's wrong with chicken soup!?!?!?
The Immune System is a competitor and competition must be exterminated.
How dare people be healthy for free? Intolerable!
Katherine... The technology attacks the placentas and causes abruptions . They found a way to kill the unborn too .
Funny thing; zinc and vitamin C are effective against both human rhinovirus and against SARS-cov-2. "Vaccines" not so much.
My thinking exactly. Read all the "efficacy"/"effectiveness" claims in the same light, and see how everything clicks into place.
Not to brag about it, but I've been saying this loud and clear for two years now (on my blog). I had already learned their language straight from their forked tongues prior to this, back in 2001.
Well, it's more of a "cure" for the multiple conflicting claims on real wealth, just ahead of assigning losses when the $US financial regime collapses. The Fed is trying to make the collapse happen in the EU first. They may well succeed. After that, in the chaos, events become unpredictable.
I will present an elegant thought which came to me.
This is a war crime of mass genocide, with these bioweapons and "countermeasure-prototypes", which happen to cause immunodeficiency... That leads to slow death from unusual causes, as we will recall from AIDS.
This appears to have been actively facilitated at the highest levels of global governance and finance and military, as well as facilitated at all operational levels below that, with "need-to-know-basis" of information-sharing, and multiple false-explanations, shared in various information-silos. Some knew most of it. It looks like Tony Fauci was that high-level of an operative, and had been for decades.
Many knew less, or could entertain some comfortable fiction or another, while their bread got buttered on this side, and risks of butter-shortage in the future got "externalized" onto billions of mere mortals. The "risks" in this case are the certainty that notional wealth exceeds physical wealth in our world by a factor of at least 10X, even without "derivatives". The "risk" is the certainty that some time soon, losses will need to be "assigned". They can most easily be assigned to the dead. They can also be assigned to those who are terrified into willing-compliance, such as might be the case for those getting e-money when they suddenly find they have no way to pay rent or bills, nor fill their gas tank.
Other categories of human would be more troublesome in pressing their claims to Social Security, their 401k, and so on.
Assigning losses, which constitute 90% of notional wealth will be a very hard political needle to thread. Those who now control the levers of wealth and power need to have already established a mechanism of firm control before the next western global financial crisis.
What if financial losses were assigned first to all those who had been instrumental or complicit in the bioweapon-war-crimes "solution" to serve current power elites and help sustain them in their positions of power.
"You conspired to kill billions of people without leaving fingerprints. You are given the choice of your-money-or-your-life. If you choose to live, you will receive your Social Security and Medicare benefits, but will relinquish all other claims on wealth. What do you choose, Mr. Gates, Dr. Fauci?"
As you see, even family fortunes would be subject to this particular test, and corporate fortunes.
It has a poetic-justice element, as well. Hell, SOMEBODY has to accept massive losses, why not those "most-deserving" first?
John,
You should repost this comment for Dr. Morgan to read.
You don't think it exceeds the "economic" bounds he prefers to engage?
You might know where he draws that line from experience.
:-)
I think he'll come around eventually, once he loses his teaching job ;)
How many people would want to live in a world where everything is a lie? Just like the matrix!
Maybe post it as a "theory" and ask for feedback
I posted it, as it became the lead essay for my blog post today, and I corroborated it with various links, some of which he'll like. https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/poetic-justice
Perhaps, if Peter McCullough and CDC correct, 92% of the US population jabracadabred at least once, and these shots were nearly all the real deal.
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/why-the-body-attacks-itself-after
There are mechanisms of auto-immune attack and also of immune deficiency, all related to spike-protein.
https://hervk102.substack.com/p/imprinting-versus-ade-in-terms-of
Spot on Katherine, except there are no viral infections... !
Now that I think about it, almost everyone believes the immune system exists only to fight infections, but it actually reacts to anything, even to inert stuff.
Anything from the exterior that reaches a place that it must not reach, will be annihilated by our God given immune system.
So, destroying it is even worse than if our only problem were infections of any kind, real or not.
Pollens, dander, etc. become worse than "inert". These "vaccines" and their adjuvants hijack the immune system, causing deleterious reaction to what it should consider inert.
Sahib- have not seen you around for a while , and so I ask, where've you been lurking... ?
You're not on amidwesterndoctor, bailiwicknews, eugyppius, and sashalatypova? "Sage Hana" (Derrick Blanton) banned me for 100 years, so I unsubbed.
gotcha ( as per D.B. aka S.H.)... had not seen you elsewhere- but I am somewhat oblivious
yes @ CAR23- the overwhelming of our waste disposal system- can result in a devastating sanitation worker's strike...(?)
The sanitation workers shell harmless litter, breaking windows left and right.
you exceed my powers of cryptography, ref. to no broken windows policy in NY under Giuliani ? or something more sublime...
Your "sanitation workers". I meant the collateral damage from the immune system attacking anything. Vaccines with adjuvants cause it to attack otherwise inert things. I consider that damage "flack". Worse if it's you; i.e. autoimmunity. No, I didn't mean to suggest Ghouly Annie. (The sot creep who despoiled the WTC forensic evidence and cemented Trump's 2020 loss.)
Truth
You, too? Those mycoplasmas, or whatever filtratatable agents, are a bear!
I caught covid from a mycoplasma in the garbage, did I? Perhaps some Rockefeller mineral oil labeled as watersnake oil would have fixed it. Still a lubricant to grease out-fection!
The gunshot victim "caught" a bullet. Must be like Superman did. (Caught speeding bullets with his bare hands.)
Ain't it the truth? That seems to be the attitude of the medical establishment now. We're all lab rats. I have avoided being jabbed so far. I hope I can avoid it going forward.
It seems to me the perps never thought anyone would figure out the extremely complex machinations they employed. You and Katherine Watt have uncovered their perfidy. It is so convoluted and evil that it is almost unspeakable/indescribable, even for those of us who understand the big picture (which clearly works to their advantage).
i just came across the word “perfidy” for the first time and subsequently learned its definition about 20 minutes ago.
i must say, never before has my baader been meinhoffed with such efficiency.
way to go, i am impressed.
The more both you and Katherine Watt dig, the more I come to the same conclusion that they are indeed implinenting Jaques Attali's 1981 suggestion of depopulation creating fear through a pandemic of low threat to get people to line up for the cure (which is poison)... A slow acting genetic poison, that will manifest in so many varieties of disease and systemic attacks as time wears on that there will be plausible deniability.
In hidden contracts that obfuscate the true nature of this crime, which you are exposing left right and centre... Thank God for warriors like you Sasha.
Some of the almost movie like villan characters are all circulating around the WEF, WHO and associated organisations (that have innocuous names Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission... That hide their true aims it seems).
Jaques Attali has been a lauded guest of the WEF as has celebrated academic, Yuval Noah Harari...
Yuval Noah Harari assured them (the elites) that humans can be controlled via the narrative, via fiction, as long as everyone believes the same story, we all co-operate (even in lining up for poison). Yuval talking about the above reference here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Alhj4UwNWp2m/
So who wouldn't believe their story? They silenced opposition, controlled the narrative, everyone seemed on board.
Secret DoD contracts assured safety to the elites and their corporation it seems.
Due to studying biology briefly at uni the mere suggestion of mRNA was a big WTF?
Dr Paul Alexander's post today about the risks of nonaparticles in medicine, especially in reproductive health was another big WTF??
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30587973/
Banning the relatively safe ivermectin in Australia was a huge WTF??
(That day I knew something big and super strange was going down... I can't quite convey just how scary that day was for me, with the news suddenly blaring horse dewormer, such obvious propaganda... Felt like the country had been invaded..)
I was fully onboard with the whole covid story, until radical genetic engineering was put forward as the "only" solution, then the friendly coercion (win money etc) then the hard stick, take it or lose your job etc. I could go on, but I think most people here witnessed this heavy enforcement of experimental, obviously deadly and dangerous stuff that you simply MUST take (although if you're injured it was your choice)...
As I said sci fi movie...
People died, but no talk of immediately suspending its use, even worse they kept saying "safe and effective" over and over like robots, when it was obviously not safe and effective...
I fricking red pilled about then...
I think, if it's indeed more than bad medicine and stupidity, and more like depopulation... With what I knew about the delicate subtleties of mRNA, it's essential contribution to cellular health in a tight relationship between your own nuclear DNA and bodily functions. I thought that in 5 to 7 years we'd see an explosion of death / cancer / autoimmunity / bodily systematic collapse / a multitude of unknown and unknowable ills ... AND I think (if it's depopulation they/elites were after) they thought the same as me... and like me, are STUNNED a lot of the death and incapacitation has been immediate and so BIG they do not know what to do, so they are currently ignoring it, working on a narrative shift to explain it all you can bet.
Their plan has come slightly undone ... They thought they could dupe the world, so you'd all be begging for their "cure", and we'd all die a few years down the track, at staggered intervals, of so many various ills, they would have plausible deniability... but so many have seen the injuries and deaths (and personally know someone, as we know VAERS, DAEN, UK Yellow Card etc are just the tip of the iceberg) that now, the refusers are glad they stood strong, the coerced are angry, and even the willing feel duped...
A few are still in the daydream, but if they get the info we've seen... They will be furious too... Let's hope we are close to a watershed moment...
Of course the asleep NEED to know this has happened and is happening...
I try my best to share the articles I find, but mainly amoreaxhing to the converted... So many are asleep and still think the mainstream news is their friend, and the news will tell them if there's a problem...
These contracts should be front page news everywhere, but aren't... This is how I've come to the slow conclusion they are trying to kill us, immediately or slowly...
Everything from the mRNA, possible rogue miRNA, the nanoparticles, the damn spike itself, other dubious ingredients it's definitely NOT a vaccine... It's a genetic biochemical nano weapon... Bioweapon is almost underselling the multiple components of this poison.
Thank you so much for all you do Sasha, one of the true heroes of humanity.
The mRNA bs also red pilled me.
And yes, there's a lot of junk in the shot, but I really think the mRNA was just a cover story for the known toxin.
Before convid, moderna had issues with their gene therapy research.
The lipid nanoparticles caused issues, especially with multiple doses.
That's why they thought vaccine, one shot, you're done.
Despite that, they did 2 shots for this weapon, err vaccine...
Why 2 shots and why that timing? https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/anaphylaxis-the-real-bio-weapon/
And I bet that it didn't work as well as expected, which is when the boosters got pushed. That goes against the issues that moderna knew about!
Also interesting is that the other tech shots have the same side effects of clotting, myocarditis, turbo cancer etc.
Was the story of mRNA gene therapy used to distract from what was the real intent, death? Who knows, but it seems so.
What you are saying ties in well with what Geoff Pain has been putting forward re endotoxins in the jab... His work is quite meticulous too... This might help with your own explorations into this ... Pfizer expected anaphylaxis due to this endotoxin content in their jabs too...
https://open.substack.com/pub/geoffpain/p/anaphylaxis-deaths-caused-by-endotoxins?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
Now why is there endotoxin in this shot that is supposed to do the deed in a different way?
Why is it normal to have endotoxins in any jab?
Exactly Rob... So much... Like you have been doing (for longer than me) I have now started listening to others, regarding previous vaccines and dangers of dubious ingredients within, including perhaps retroviruses contributing to all sorts of ills...
I'm currently reading your first article "Proteins, Spikes and Bio-weapons", thank you for the link, a great read so far!
I'm new to a lot of this but even Judy Mikovitt's (despite controversy and in fighting these days) paper on XMRVs contained in (previous to covid) shots is a disturbing read (much too late for me I've had enough of them to have many of these problems inside me... I wasn't a regular vaccinee ... But I flippantly got the flu jab in 2019 without a second thought... Thankfully I woke up and did not go near these bioweapons!
I've always had a long suspicion about vaccines.
They have toxic ingredients that are somehow safe? That's nuts.
It wasn't until convid that I started to look deeper.
Check out the show the highwire. Aaron Siri https://aaronsiri.substack.com is their lawyer that has been doing great work in showing how there's insufficient safety and efficacy testing on all the vaccines!
If you want to go deeper into the murk around virology, check out this channel..
Especially the toxicology video
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c
Thanks Rob, I have been a follower of Aaron Siri and The Highwire, I think they've done a lot to educate and update all of us, great job they do... Similarly I came across Sam Bailey, and have not read, but did buy her Virus Mania book (she was coauthor I think), even though some of it goes against what I learnt in uni, I like to take into account all positions on this subject, and I've enjoyed reading your first two WordPress articles today, thank you, very well written!! ... No matter how we approach all of this, we are on the same sides, have the same concerns... and we all can see the agenda at play (for what parts of the agenda we can deduce, can only imagine they have detailed plans, and we're just deciding phase one!). We can all see the poisons on offer, the potential beyond the death and destruction they have already wrought...
You're right (from WordPress articles) much of the science they "rediscover" was known at turn of last century ...
Now take Louis Pasteur, who apparently faked this research but for now let's take it at face value...
He did experiments with chicken cholera by dividing the chickens into two groups vaccinated and unvaccinated... Here's the important bit, he exposed both groups to chicken cholera... According to him, the unvaxxed chickens all died and the vaxxed chickens didn't... He repeated the experiment, same result...
What I'm looking at is the research design... Not bad...
Look at our vaccine research for covid vax, two groups of people vaccinated and unvaccinated and a large sample size at that, so far so good... BUT... Who was exposed to covid? We don't know... Pot luck...
Terrible research design and can't prove anything because we didn't control the variable we were researching, we didn't control who was exposed to covid... I do not care if it was ethical... There is zero proof it stops covid, of prevents illness or death, as we don't know who was exposed to covid... No claims can be made as the research design is a failure.
Pasteurs design was better than modern pharma...
Yet we mandated based on that crap research design.
Your article made me think of that! Thanks for the links Rob... All the best
"the refusers are glad they stood strong, the coerced are angry, and even the willing feel duped..." so true.
Yes, i also think that they didn't intend for it to work so quickly. I think the narrative was beginning to fail as early as June 2021 and got worse that summer and they turned to the mandates and coercion as a reaction to that early fissure in the narrative.
Yes, the mRNA vax frenzy here in Australia also red pilled me. I have never seen anything so creepy and downright evil in my life.
Well said Steve. I came across this guy https://steve-patterson.com/our-present-dark-age-part-1/ a few days ago. It really put the world into a lot more perspective for me. You might enjoy.
Thank you Judith I look forward to having a read of it
I posted your work on truth-social, and GETTR. Now I should go skiing before things warm up. ⛷️
Do you think other big Pharma brands are also in this scheme ？
yes, there are 300+ members of the MCDC consortium alone. The DOD captured the entire pharma industry through bullshit "biodefense" projects, truckloads of money, and vague requirements over the past 20 years.
It's not just pharmas, it's entire healthcare and associated industries, all contracts here: https://www.keionline.org/covid-contracts
No one writes bigger checks than the Monster.
Random question from link. Does anyone know Why the government abruptly shut down monoclonal antibodies (Regeneron)? they amended a contract for it in 2021.
Maybe because they worked? I don't know, I never reviewed the data for them. Most likely because they are a therapy and the government needs to inject everyone, so having a therapy available makes people less scared of "the virus" and less likely to line up for the needle.
It cannot be because the production of monoclonal ABs is thoroughly disgusting, because hospital food and school food is even worse and no one cares.
Remdesivir
According to Bryan Ardis monoclonal antibodies have been shown to help neutralize the effects of snake venom which Dr. Artis claims is a major component of the bioweapon shots. It is still not clear to me if he is talking about actual venom from real crate snakes or a synthesized pathogen based on the biological properties of snake venom. This would make more sense. How many real snakes are available to produce 12 billion shots? This distinction could be why Dr. Artis is having such a hard time convincing the world of his theory. Not real venom but an artificial product.
Antivenom drugs are monoclonal antibodies (it's a class of medicine, not a specific product). The problem is they have to be very specific to the specific venom, and even within the same class of snakes, eg. rattlesnakes - they have different venoms regionally. So it is not a great general approach, it may be not effective at all if you don't know what "bit" you.
Totally makes sense. I wonder about that. We have several different types of poisonous snakes here and different treatments applied. Thx.
Poor guy. He should have talked to his friends before making that video with Mr. Sensational (Peters).
And even before he produced his anti-venom products.
I don't know where Stew is headed for. Dr Jane Ruby departed from the network.
Ha! I didn’t know he has anti-venom products. Good grief.
"agrees that Pfizer's efforts to develop and manufacture a vaccine intended to prevent COVID-19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 are aspirational in nature"
"Dangerous Aspirations"..... That could be a book title. I'm gonna go get a blood test and make sure somebody didn't slip some acid in my Pop Tarts....
"Pfizer STILL is the agency that committed the fraud, where the FDA and DOD have set Pfizer up to take the fall, even though all three were apparently in on it."
I have been wondering for many months if this deal had a built in parachute from the beginning. Maybe an array of shell companies woven into the mix from the beginning. Hide the profits and assets in the shell companies and let Pfizer fall into the pit.
You can afford it when you are wallowing around in the pile of cash generated from a multi trillion dollar scam.
I'd like to see a book with the following title make it to the best-seller list:
"Sufficient Anger: Breaking Through Fear to Active Resistance".
"You can afford it when you are wallowing around in the pile of cash generated from a multi trillion dollar scam." That and yer sugar daddies can create money at will with no adverse consequences to themselves.
Thank you Sasha.. keep it up.. more and more incriminating evidence for Nuremberg..
Sasha - learning to read the fine print thanks to you. Some semantic observations:
"capable of providing protection against the SARS-CoV-2 threat and related coronaviruses, subject to technical, clinical and regulatory success."
"capable of" does not imply success. maybe some of the vials actually work, if not, fine, they're just "capable." also funny how words like "preventing" or "curing" or "healing" are nowhere to be found. just "success" which i guess means they managed to brew up a bunch of stuff and put it in vials.
"unprecedented threats to several components of the prototype project" - this sounds to me like people might be upset if they knew what several components of the bioweapon were. and how is "threat" defined? notice how covid was not defined as a virus but a "threat." does this wording therefore justify a lethal weapon against such a "threat?"
"assuming the clinical data supports such application for approval or authorization." approval and authorization are two different things. EUA = authorization. approval requires very specific steps by the FDA.
this time i resisted the urge to scroll straight down to see today's painting - so beautiful
Anyone else see this one??? The Pediatricians are still at it. This happened not far from where I live. https://billricejr.substack.com/p/children-allegedly-vaccinated-without
I think when the average American thinks of an FDA approved drug they are not thinking in terms of all this exceptionalism and voodoo studies with 8 mice. I think they are thinking of real studies, real human or animal subjects of substantial number, real scientists, legit from A to Z. So, if all this subterfuge should come out, I think the FDA might as well sink the ship.
Thank you for your work and passion. ❤️
There's so much limited liability in these contracts that yes, there's almost no contract or agreement at all.
Hopefully, we can all learn something from the following Bible passage:
Genesis 6:5-8 KJV
[5] And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. [6] And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. [7] And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. [8] But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.
There is still hope! Praise the Lord!
Sasha & Katherine have blown the doors off this thing. Isn't it funny not 60 days after they release this information in digestible format - they roll out the lab leak story. It's so disappointing to see people pursue that when the real story is right here.
Excellent work once again. If your government is going to contract with an outside party, in this case "Prizer", to develop and deliver a substance capable of murdering humans, it would seem to me that ALL parties involved are equally culpable (there's that good old "equality" thing again that government harps on all the time) and none are exempt for any reason. Attempted murder is just that as well as actual murder being just that. The government does not get to commit murder on its citizens and say it is something else.
I can see it now how it will go with "Prizer" taking the fall. A fine of perhaps $500 million, likely distributed into the pockets of the DOD, HHS, FDA, CDC and others. A new "contract" to deliver another 500 million doses of mRNA poisons for the next invented pandemic (worth several $billions) and absolutely no one even going to jail or prison. This isn't Russia where Putin is going ahead with the "offing" with NO trials of 130 scientists involved as criminals in this vaccine farce, or so I hear.
Hi Sasha,
I don't quite agree with your take on the wording of the various parts of the Statement Of Work, because I think the expectation of getting a properly approved product by way of properly conducted and properly reported clinical trials is unmistakably stated in clear language.
The clincher of absurdity for me, as you quoted me saying (Thanks), is the "Limitation of Liability" section, which seems to contradict (thus counteract) all that language of clearly stated expectations, making the whole thing a joke. I cannot fathom any serious agreement ever allowing the parties to agree not to take the agreement seriously, as part of the agreement. "We agree not to take our agreement seriously." It's like saying, "You can't believe anything I say." Such a saying is illegitimate -- it has no use or function -- it has no operational capacity in human dealings -- it is self contradictory in such a circular way that it leads nowhere -- it has no traction that enables human beings to understand it or act in accordance to it.
As I read it, the whole Statement Of Work reduces to the same sort of beast. All the right words are there in the beginning and throughout most of the document, and it pretty much reads legitimately for me, but then you get to that Section 11.6, and it all goes to clown world.
Given its two faced nature, therefore, if Pfizer can argue based on the clown-face side of it, then a lawyer can argue based on the serious-face side of it, and a judge can rule on the serious-face side of it.
So how do you then reconcile the "expectation for properly conducted trials" with them being excluded from scope of the SOW, AND excluded from statutory requirements for countermeasures under PHE?
Just writing a promise to do something properly, when there are no hooks, no enforcement, no liability does not work. Also a contract is NOT the place/method to regulate clinical trial conduct.
It is inappropriate, because if the contracting parties agree to interpret something certain way, i.e. what Pfizer did, in the opinion of DOD was sufficient in the performance of the contract - then good luck.
I know everyone wants to go after pharmas on this. And we should. However, there is no legal requirement for them. The only thing that exists is that they made public statements advertising the product, the CEOs and executives did. In the UK they already got slap on the wrist for false claims, the CEO of Moderna was found making false claims about safety and efficacy. And absolutely NOTHING happened.
Yep
I just wrote another comment that might help answer your question.
Simply put, I do NOT interpret "out of scope" to mean what the Pfizer lawyers are saying. So I guess that means I do NOT agree that "out of scope" means what you are suggesting, which I think gives the Pfizer lawyers what they are looking for. I give them nothing here -- they are misinterpreting basic language in a specific context. Don't let them have that.
Your read is consistent with mine, as I'm understanding you.
So, like you, I get the sense that there is a level of risk here that has been improperly allowed, to tweak the technology and learn as they go, using the whole human race as subjects in their illegal experiment, which they sneakily try to redefine away as something else.
A prototype IS an experiment, regardless of what the heads of this snake are trying to fool people into believing. If all the elements of the process fit the definition of an experiment, then it is an experiment. Simply saying that it is not an experiment does not change this.
Maybe...but that's what we've been telling you all along...