For some reason, I can't post an answer to your previous comment. My reply about "antibodies" was in regard to claims that if someone has antibodies for X that means they have immunity to X. That's fake science that is propagandized by CDC. Regarding monoclonals, that's a different topic. Snake anti-venom is extremely hit and miss, snakes have large variability in venoms even within species or region, almost like they have zip codes, so it just depends on what is being stocked and how recently updated, and that is not "immunity" at all. Monoclonals for other things are also either ineffective or have large risks, like the ones for cancer have fulminant cancer as possible side effect for example.
Alright, so snake venom antitoxin is pseudo-science? Monoclonal antibodies, B Cells?
Masurel ran HI with donor blood from before 1957, dozens of samples for every year born. People born before 1900 could HI 1968 flu, people born before 1890 could HI 1957 flu. People born after couldn't HI either one. And the same thing was found earlier for swine flus, same thing still found today for flus. Donors match historical record of flus that were around when they were alive. I don't have to assert this "proves" anything, it's just a reality that exists regardless of what anyone wants to make of it.
They’re still fake because the alleged pandemic wasn’t.
That's... not exactly a convincing historical thesis.
For some reason, I can't post an answer to your previous comment. My reply about "antibodies" was in regard to claims that if someone has antibodies for X that means they have immunity to X. That's fake science that is propagandized by CDC. Regarding monoclonals, that's a different topic. Snake anti-venom is extremely hit and miss, snakes have large variability in venoms even within species or region, almost like they have zip codes, so it just depends on what is being stocked and how recently updated, and that is not "immunity" at all. Monoclonals for other things are also either ineffective or have large risks, like the ones for cancer have fulminant cancer as possible side effect for example.
Antibodies are pseudo-science. They mean absolutely nothing and do not prove existence of pandemics or even epidemics.
Alright, so snake venom antitoxin is pseudo-science? Monoclonal antibodies, B Cells?
Masurel ran HI with donor blood from before 1957, dozens of samples for every year born. People born before 1900 could HI 1968 flu, people born before 1890 could HI 1957 flu. People born after couldn't HI either one. And the same thing was found earlier for swine flus, same thing still found today for flus. Donors match historical record of flus that were around when they were alive. I don't have to assert this "proves" anything, it's just a reality that exists regardless of what anyone wants to make of it.
Agreed. Let’s go on believing the lies :)