101 Comments
Jan 26·edited Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

This is so well written. I would propose that this be in the package insert for all EUA products until they are abolished forever. Doctors and pharmacists should be required to read this aloud to the recipient before administering or recommending one of these substances. Perhaps states could consider adding that as a requirement as we work to dismantle this system.

The facts as laid out here are essentially a revolutionary text akin to "Common Sense" and widespread knowledge of this would lead to a collapse of confidence in our governing institutions. Under the false auspices of these rules, they could liquify ham sandwich and inject it into you with total immunity.

"Trust us" is the entire basis for the EUA system.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

I agree! I'd add to the comment you made about doctors reading this to every patient, that also it should be played over the intercoms at all pharmacies.

Expand full comment

Only those administering EUA products, which legitimate pharmacies have no business doing.

Expand full comment
RemovedJan 27
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Reposting this over and over again with no explanation make no sense. Adios!

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

"...they could liquify ham sandwich and inject it into you..." — we wish!

If only it were something so innocuous.

Expand full comment

Unless the pigs in the ham were injected with sham (mRNA).

Expand full comment
RemovedJan 27·edited Jan 27
Comment removed
Expand full comment

"not capable", excellent perspective and right in imo

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

New FDA final rule in the national registry just went into effect 3 days ago allowing for clinical trial research/experiments without informed consent on all humans regardless of age, health etc.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-12-21/pdf/2023-27935.pdf

I’ve read the whole thing. It indicates that no informed consent needed however I can’t find anything that would prevent opting out by informing our healthcare providers to cease and desist in any and all clinical medical research/experiments upon our person(s) without our express written consent. This new final rule is really horrific. Sasha can you help to break this down and tear this apart and get word out about this. Thank you so much 🙏

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

So this was approved back in December and is effective Jan 22 this year. I found information here https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical

Apparently they had fewer than 50 comments during the 'comment period'; it seems that there is no way to practice 'do not comply'.

Expand full comment

We need a controlled demolition of the entire edifice.

Expand full comment

Yes. As long as the present system of government continues to exist with the same type of people occupying the positions of power and control within it we don't stand a chance.

I will keep fighting but I will probably be killed by the system when I'm no longer able to push back their attacks at a personal level.

Expand full comment

Thank you for linking the 'govinfo' document. I believe health care providers can be motivated away from potential genocide by presenting them with this Conditional Acceptance: >>>

- CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF VACCINATION -

- AGREEMENT BETWEEN VACCINE PROVIDERS AND VACCINATED PARTY -

Opening Statement: “Herein the terms “administration” and “administrators” refers to all parties providing and/or “mandating” vaccine services and products including vaccine Manufacturers, Marketers, Lobbyists, Distributors, Hospitals, Clinics, Physicians, Nurses, Government Agents and Agencies, Healthcare Providers, Elected Officials, Enforcement Persons, Agencies and Programs, and all other parties bringing “mandated” vaccines to application or to market in any way.”

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.freedomtaker.com%2Fdownloaddocuments%2FVaccinationNotice_v3.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

Please read and comprehend the *intent* of the entire document.

Expand full comment

Yikes! If you have any developmentally delayed individuals in your sphere please be ever more vigilant. This screams of potential mengele-level abuses.

I am always leery of terms like "minimal risk" especially in the government or medical context. Likewise when "risk/benefit" is discussed. They may as well say, "you take the risk while we reap the benefit."

Expand full comment

So can someone provide a short blurb that we can print out and have attached to all our medical records. Are doctors even aware of this and they too should be outraged?

Expand full comment

It’ll be interesting to see which research gets the “no consent required” waiver. The research must pose at most “minimal risk” which even the FDA would admit would not apply to administering vaccines. The risk of even “mild” adverse reactions is not “minimal” according to the definition. I think this mostly about research involving previously collected data, or based on surveys.

Expand full comment
Jan 26·edited Jan 28Liked by Sasha Latypova

Thank you so much, Sasha! You are a hero to humanity! I have been in the IRB (Institutional Review Board) industry within academia, for 21-years. I have been wondering whether this (nefarious) 'biological product' is actually a 'combination product' (a device, a software, a biologic, and a DNA-changer). God bless you!

Expand full comment

As far as I can make out through all the research I've conducted over the past three years no one outside of the manufacturers of this jab is sure about what is actually in it. Sasha herself has pointed to the extreme variability of the vaxx lots. We have a system that is being operated by maniacs. Nothing is beyond them. Except having a deep and enduring respect for life in general.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Lovely painting, Sasha. The roses seem to glow from within. Thanks for sharing it.

(I appreciate the EUA memo, too)

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Beauty reminds us that truth prevails—your painting wafts of hope.

Expand full comment

Some people have an abundance of talent.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

"In summary, the process through which the EUA products enter interstate commerce and claims about their safety, efficacy or contents are based solely on the HHS Secretary opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Misrepresentation of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products is allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information. "

This is genious!

Ask the question " What reliable information do you have that supports your theory that these countermeasures are safe and effective?" of your provider. They will probably give you an answer that will allow you to assert a claim of "enticement to commit suicide or gross bodily harm".

In any event, they cannot posssibly provide informed consent and any coercive action at all is unreasonable under the circumstances.

Expand full comment

Absolutely right. “Informed consent” is a contradiction where ‘consent’ entails self-harm. If the subject isn’t aware of the harm then it’s *misinformed* and void of consent.

‘Consent’ in context of medical treatment implies risk calculation based on reliable data. But these are bioweapons in guise of “vaccines” rendering any talk of ‘consent’ fraudulent misnomer.

A more pernicious undercurrent at work here is the fashionable idea of individual sovereignty. But no one has sovereignty over his own life such as to decide on its termination.

Suicide is a mortal sin. One can no more ‘consent’ to suicide than to birth. To imagine otherwise is to turn away from God and make Gods of ourselves.

And that’s ultimately all “Covid” boils down to. To define such atrocity as “psychopaths” is accounting in clinical terms for divinising of the self, where man plays God, where no value is higher than self-gratification in whatever form. Also, no less delusionally, called ‘freedom’.

The proper term however politically incorrect for divinising of self is evil or sin which absolutely no one is free of.

For those who prefer naturalistic explanations, understood zoologically man is a predatory pack animal given to intraspecific violence.

It comes to the same thing.

The Catholic Church itself endorses Darwinian evolution as a biological theory not in contradiction with the dignity of the human person.

What biology can’t explain is the value of the individual person and his sense of right and wrong, and indeed of such a concept as biology and of truth itself.

Expand full comment
Jan 26·edited Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

This summary is phenomenal, super clear. For those with short attention spans or who learn visually, would you consider adding a few of your most excellent charts to this package of points?

You presented some excellent charts in your discussion here (https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/full-recording-of-the-briefing-with). I took a few screen shots and printed them for my own use.

Or consider these three:

1. https://drive.proton.me/urls/JKHS9D1BPC#NnmyGu2ZweQQ - slide 12

2. From https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/do-fentanyl-dealers-violate-cgxp

2a: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fac535065-fbe5-4b4f-8287-5c44e7b14602_3993x2355.png

2b: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd28f4f62-7736-4ebb-9c2e-c4af9633378f_1601x958.png

❣️❣️❣️Love, love, love the roses! 🌹🌹🌹🌹

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Thank you ever so much from the bottom of my heart for posting this this information is invaluable. Yes, I have followed all of this from the beginning, but to have this in a format, that we can present to the school or your employer is invaluable. Blessings always for all the good that you do🦋💕🦋

Expand full comment

Just tell them, "Your mandate is not my concern."

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Great synopsis and very well documented. I would add the following introductory sentences:

"This document reveals the extraordinary loophole that has been created in US medical laws and rules to allow COVID-19 "vaccines" to be produced, distributed and administered without following Good Laboratory Practices, Good Clinical Practice, Good Manufacturing Practices, informed consent, and without being scientifically assessed via clinical trials to determine if Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies are needed. In other words, all normal safety procedures that were originally established to protect Americans from harmful drugs have been avoided in Operation Warp Speed."

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Looking at #11, they can put literally anything they want to put in the vial.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Sasha a per usual you bring the Receipts. Fresh Hell. Now what? Do our best to disengage from the system and fight back. We must be Brave and Courageous. Knowledge is power. Thank u for all your hard work and effort. This Evil Surrounds us but we must not despair. Your continued contributions are so appreciated. Knowledge is power. Spelling will be their downfall. Thank you as always for the enlightenment.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

You continue to amaze. I am deeply grateful there are talented, knowledgeable professionals like yourself willing to explain this incredibly convoluted criminality to people like me.

Beautiful roses!

Expand full comment
Jan 26·edited Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Thank you, Sasha. This fits in with my opinion that no one should ever be authorized to declare a so-called ‘emergency’. We all now know why they do it, and the results of same.

Expand full comment

Hello Cathleen Manny: You nailed it right here: 'no one should ever be authorized to declare a so-called ‘emergency’.' Yes. "Emergency" declaration is the basis of the entire fraud.

All such unlawful mandate needs to be eliminated from corporate sponsored fascism. Thank you for commenting.

Expand full comment
RemovedJan 27
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Yo Blue Electric Storm: I just finished reading about 100 comments on various Substack pages. I'm pretty sure the 'calling wolf' story has been removed from all school libraries... Seems no one notices that All corporate wolf structures contain BIG nasty teeth, and gaggles of attorneys that munch on individual liberty...

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Brilliant. Thanks. Sadly, every institution in the West (especially the US Axis powers) is so hopelessly corrupt and anti-Human that one can expect NO justice for the people within its borders. ...And, we were told the Soviet Union was evil.. They were kindergardners compared to our Ruling Psychopathy.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

Well rounded synopsis. Too bad my state legislators only read fascist fiction.

Expand full comment

they should nevertheless, be bombarded with the Truth, as their staff see and screen all letters, and there are many more of them. Better chance of lighting that fire of truth in a mind.

Expand full comment
Jan 26Liked by Sasha Latypova

This is for those to use in their "legal fiction" capacity - who are and choose to be in contract with legislative democracies at all levels (local to fed) - none of the "govt" entities listed curently operate as Republican forms of government - they are all registered corporations and do not follow the original Constitution. When you live in the private - you are not in contract with them

Expand full comment

Mandates aren't contracts.

Expand full comment

Wasn't referring to a mandate being a contract. I am referring to the fact that everyone is in contract with corporate govt through the all caps Birth Certificate system - it is the originating point. When men and women break those contracts (taxes, licenses, registrations, etc.) then they don't exist as a "legal fiction" and instead live in the "private". All corporate governments today operate in the public space and the contracts we have with them per above keeps us in the public space where they set the rules and conditions

Expand full comment

Employers and public colleges enforcing edicts based on mandates usually require Social Security numbers. That usually requires a birth certificate, as do driver licenses. My grandmother was employed, and received social security. However, she had no birth certificate, so obtaining a passport to travel to London was an interesting process.

Expand full comment

Yes. Quite correct. Thank you for commenting.

Expand full comment

all related parties definitely need this thrust before their faces. even if they feign ignorance or believe their own b.s., they can't argue they didn't see it. amazing all the psychological defense mechanisms with these people... https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/so-many-are-still-in-denial-about?r=8ypo0&amp%3Butm_campaign=post&amp%3Butm_medium=web&amp%3BshowWelcome=true%20#vaccineinjuries%20#VaccineGenocide

Expand full comment