Are we being to what to think here?...while being accused of believing others? Is someone coming unglued here? Lost one’s cool? This is tortuous to follow.
What do you think was happening in 2020 with the people who did indeed seem to have "something" and were unable to breathe and were very sick? I definitely encountered people during that period who were dumbfounded by the severity of their symptoms. I also got "something" in 2021 which lingered for quite some time, and I did lose my sense of taste and smell for several days. It was very odd.
There have actually been people who have had somewhat more severe symptoms of a seasonal respiratory illness since 2020. Firstly, with age, the immune system can weaken. So the symptoms can one day be more severe than before. Unfortunately, many people see it through the prism of the plandemic. Every year there is a group of people who have more severe symptoms than before. However, no one reported this so often before 2020. The same applies to the sense of smell and taste, which is possible with any respiratory illness. It is a complication after the illness that does not necessarily have anything to do with the illness. It may be that the immune system has become weaker because it "had too much to do". And secondly, there have been many psychosomatic cases. The fear of a (non-existent) SARS-CoV-2 causes stress. The body produces a lot of cortisol and that has an immunosuppressive effect. This can intensify the symptoms of flu. Nevertheless, there were no statistical figures for a global excess mortality. So no new virus, no pandemic.
I have compiled all the evidence in the Substack linked below. Some articles were written in collaboration with Dr. Mike Yeadon. If you see a mistake somewhere, it is my fault. :
JJ Couey makes some really interesting observations of the RNA reproduction fidelity of a run of the mill coronavirus vs a lab-made circular DNA version. The latter is much more capable of infection and transmission but once in the wild, it will simmer down just like the regular kind.
His point that really stands out for me is the lack of any background signal before hand. Without that you can make all manner of claims regarding a new virus. Especially if a test shows the presence of some protein (whether you're actually sick or not).
I did get wickedly sick (with a positive test) a couple of years ago but I still can't be sure it wasn't just a seeded poisoning event, or some peculiar susceptibility to some particular entity or something else. But I'm inclined to disbelieve any simple official narrative because the data doesn't support the claims and the sheer number of lies that was propagated regarding immunology, masking, lockdowns, viruses, "vaccines" etc.. means I can put aside my own anecdotal experience and keep an open mind.
Avian flu? Nah, I'm concerned about the reactions of tyrannical sheep instead.
There are way too many SHEEP as I’m not jabbed and finding a non jabbed is not happening. The jabbers do SHED and being a pure blood I can only be with another pure blood as in NO SEX, NO KISSING a jabbed makes a pure blood.
"The sad reality is that repetition of nonsense, myths, sci-fi and outright lies - if done in sufficient daily volume - is all that’s needed to form the “reality” in the heads of the masses, no matter how absurd. The past 4 years are a testament to this. "
Recently watched hours of a "Covid Royal Commission" in a nation I will not name.
Astounding ignorance, or brainwashing, allowed obviously flawed input, even outright lies, to prevail as facts.
Very, very alarming.
Do these people really think that they are running a competent inquiry?
Or just a convincing coverup?
I thought that the fog of deception was beginning to lift.
Here is a brilliant comment to the posting on the Courageous Discourse Substack:
David Lamb
Writes Cosmic Consultant
Nov 20, 2022
I'm writing this comment, Dr. McCullough only because I have great respect for your willingness to speak truth as you see it in the face of an establishment that doesn't want to hear it. I really hope you keep going with that attitude, because there's so much more to discover.
The article perfectly demonstrates how totally illogical conclusions and nonsense 'research' is passed off as scientific conclusions.
First, need I remind you that the 'vaccines' that are killing probably millions of people globally, and injuring many times more, are "well accepted" too? And I could make a long list of ideas "well accepted" that are very irrational, but I think you get the point.
The first two sentences are full of condescension, misrepresentation, and factually incorrect assertions. German virologist/microbiologist Dr Stefan Lanka has been exposing the fact that virology is all fraud for almost 30 years, so those who've actually studied the research are hardly motivated by "endless frustrations". And in fact nobody is "denying the existence" of anything. The "denying" allegation is your manipulative spin as a form of mockery. Those of us who've put in the work to go through a century of virology research and fully understand Lanka's conclusions are not denying the existence of anything. What we're saying is that there is no published research to date that demonstrates isolating a 'virus' from a sick person. It is the Rockefeller medicine establishment, which you represent, that's the party claiming there's a SARS-CoV-2 'virus' and "it" is the cause of the new disease. Therefore the burden of proof is on you and Rockefeller medicine, and that burden has not been satisfied. Because a few people have discovered the virology con, and have challenged the supposed proof that the establishment puts forward, we're labeled "virus deniers" as clueless people laugh, everyone assures each other that there's still 'consensus' that there's really a virus making everyone sick, and that's the end of it, in your view. No need to actually, honestly look at the research and answer the tough questions, because there's "consensus". What a profoundly cowardly reality...
Laboratory methods in virology do not "demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection". The claimed 'virus' is only an end product of the culture of dying cells; there is no isolated 'virus' at the beginning, so the assertion of "invasion" is pure imagination. The same 'virus' can be produced with no sick patient sample added at the beginning, which is why the "well accepted" virology lab processes never include true controls. The so-called 'viruses' are exosomes, which you probably know are encapsulated genetic debris from the process of cell death. Virology has simply perfected the methods for reliably producing cell death via added toxins and inducing cell starvation in ways that trigger the release of certain types of exosomes, which are then photographed and touted as proof of 'viruses'.
And if the exosomes are then added to a new cell culture, that also receives the same cocktail of additives that poisons and starves the cultured cells, voila, more exosomes excreted by the dying cells, and 'proof of virus transmission'! No, it's only proof that people are being willfully blind.
Surely, Dr McCullough, you must be aware of Christine Massey's two-and-a-half year FOIA campaign to find the "well accepted" proof of isolation of a SARS-CoV-2 'virus'. With over 200 responses from government health agencies and scientific institutions all over the world, not one can cite any research proof of virus isolation. Their replies do not claim Massey misunderstands what constitutes 'virus isolation'; they simply admit they have no proof of virus isolation. This includes the US CDC.
So the photos you parade here are completely meaningless, utter nonsense, because you have no idea what the photographed particles are or where they came from. Revealingly, the article says nothing about where they came from, not even in the footnotes or references. The article simply asserts that they're SARS-CoV-2 particles without evidence, and you treat it as a scientific conclusion. I'll wager that if you find out where the particles came from, they're lab creations from cultures of dying cells that had no real 'virus' isolated from a sick person added at the beginning.
Which is why you started the article with the "well accepted" theme, and mocking the "virus deniers": because that's all you have, and something deep inside of you knows it.
It will be interesting to see which way you go, Dr. McCullough. You're in an interesting predicament of either conforming to what's "well accepted" in your field (which means telling the public that the 'vaccines' are good for them and everyone should go get boosted today) and keeping your prestigious professional standing, or recognizing that 'the emperor' has no clothes and is a pathological liar, and losing the establishment endorsement deal in order to find the inconvenient truths.
I wish you the best.
-
As you can see, there is an important debate ongoing regarding the existence of viruses in general and the process of their isolation, toxicity and infectiousness.
The search for the plandemic construct has unearthed a massive collusion of the Pharma industry, doctors, regulatory agencies and politics to control populations. Benevolent individuals trying to ethically frame the shortcomings of the science perpetrated such as yourself, Katherine Watt, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Didier Raoult and Dr. David Martin (to name a few) have focused on the essential fraud committed and have offered unthinkable answers. Your collective effort points to a deliberate ‘culling’ of populations and to the medicalization of as many people as possible for profit and mechanisms of control.
The debate has reached the heart of an obvious scientific conundrum: does/did the virus exist? and as an extension; do viruses as described through virology actually exist?
Back in 2022 criticizing virology elicited harsh but curious responses by individuals and institutions alike:
Dr. Peter McCullough sent out the paper by Lesley J. Calder, Thomas Calcraft, Saira Hussain, Ruth Harvey & Peter B. Rosenthal: Electron Cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 Virions to subscribers of Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake Peter’s Newsletter, also cross-posted on Courageous Discourse™ on November 17th, 2022 (Courageous Discourse Substack).
In the quoted paper the following is stated:
‘Seeing the Virus Up Close Makes It Difficult to Deny its Existence’
'A picture speaks a thousand words and should help even the most skeptical “viral denier” come onto the rational team that is trying to treat high risk patients, end ridiculous contagion control measures, and bring our world back to normal'.
I sent the below copied eMail in response to the paper to Dr.Peter McCullough and Peter Halligan, adding a comment posted by David Lamb (Cosmic Consultant):
Hello Mr. Halligan and Dr. Peter McCullough:
I have subscribed and receive your Substack newsletter.
Re: Electron Cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 Virions (Nature Magazine 17.11.22).
Your posting essentially states that the virus exists and those questioning the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus better join the ‘rational team’, since ‘seeing is believing’ and put to end the debate over its existence.
‘Seeing is believing’ is not a scientific method.
Nature Magazine, offering an ‘Open Access’ article is curious, especially regarding the ‘seeing is believing’ visualization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and, as you point out, attempting to end ‘The endless frustrations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis and pandemic response [that] has led some to push back denying existence of the virus altogether’.
The paper (and you) kindly point to the availability of viral strains of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan/Alpha/Beta/Delta) from sources in the UK (Imperial College/RVU-PHE/AHI-South Africa). Of greatest interest is the statement that the original Wuhan strain was obtained from: The Respiratory Virus Unit, Public Health England (PHE), UK and grown under Level 3 biosecurity conditions.
A virus responsible for ‘multi-millions of infections and millions of deaths world-wide’ is grown in a Francis Crick Institute Bio Lab in the UK under Biosecurity level 3 conditions to aid in the visualization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus? This admission is massive, since world-wide FOIA request asking for proof of the existence of the isolated virus were unable to receive a positive answer from multiple nationstate health regulators. The responses all stated that they do not have an isolate to make available for research. Here in this paper the growth of the isolated SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain is done in the UK at a Level 3 Biosecurity lab for a paper visualizing the SARS-CoV-2 virus, just like that.
‘All viruses were grown at the World Influenza Centre, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK under Biosafety level 3 conditions in Vero V1 cells, provided by Professor Steve Goodbourne, St George’s Hospital, University of London, UK and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) Gibco™ 41965039, with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Pen-Strep) and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS)’. —> (Steve Goodbourn is also part of the Veterinary Vaccination Network)
This is from the Francis Crick Institute website: ‘We monitor flu strains around the world and inform vaccine development, working within the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, consisting of over 150 laboratories and institutions worldwide. The WHO established the Worldwide Influenza Centre in 1948 at the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), now part of the Crick’. https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/platforms-and-facilities/worldwide-influenza-centre (Francis Crick Institute).
The quoted paper also points to the use of in ‘Vero V1’ cells in the growth process of obtained SARS-CoV-2 samples. Vero V1 cells are monkey kidney cells (aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum). The scientific debate surrounding virus isolation is at odds with the use of Vero cells, arguing contamination of the sample and pursuant inability to isolate the/a virus (if at all).
The funding of your quoted research was provided in part by Cancer Research UK, which is funded by the Wellcome Trust.
The Francis Crick Institute is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the WHO, (also funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).
Wendy Barclay is working with the Imperial College London (As is Neil Ferguson) which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Structural Biology Science Technology Platform (eNMR virtual Organization in Life Sciences) is part of the Francis Crick Institute. Life Sciences is a term coined and used by the Pharma industry.
The funding of the mRNA gene therapy medications was provided by the same sources as the paper you are quoting to convince the reader (me) that the debate about the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a proven fact (look at the EM images!). The same scientism argument has been used to convince the public to take the Covid vaccines, without safety and efficacy studies, since they stop transmission and prevent infection (clearly they do not).
Posting this paper is at odds with what you Dr.Peter McCullough are attempting to do, namely exposing the construct of the pandemic and exposing the crime of withholding known remedies for the disease Covid-19. You sir are quoting the eugenicists by posting their paper which wants to convince me to join their ‘rational team’, since ‘seeing is believing’?!
All The Best!
Albrecht
P.S: I never received an answer from Dr. Peter McCullough. I received a query from Peter Halligen asking if I received an answer.
I will post David Lambs comment separately (post is too long...)
Great stuff.
Supplemental to yours, Sasha. Pandemic from two ingredients: PCR fakery + deaths certification scam by the WHO.
PCR: https://klim.substack.com/p/making-a-pandemic?r=1iemnw
Death certification: https://klim.substack.com/p/coming-soon?r=1iemnw
or here (same but combined):
https://c2cjournal.ca/2023/06/making-a-pandemic-a-simple-meat-potato-recipe/
Are we being to what to think here?...while being accused of believing others? Is someone coming unglued here? Lost one’s cool? This is tortuous to follow.
maybe he was lying in his disavowals?
Thank you for this.
What do you think was happening in 2020 with the people who did indeed seem to have "something" and were unable to breathe and were very sick? I definitely encountered people during that period who were dumbfounded by the severity of their symptoms. I also got "something" in 2021 which lingered for quite some time, and I did lose my sense of taste and smell for several days. It was very odd.
There have actually been people who have had somewhat more severe symptoms of a seasonal respiratory illness since 2020. Firstly, with age, the immune system can weaken. So the symptoms can one day be more severe than before. Unfortunately, many people see it through the prism of the plandemic. Every year there is a group of people who have more severe symptoms than before. However, no one reported this so often before 2020. The same applies to the sense of smell and taste, which is possible with any respiratory illness. It is a complication after the illness that does not necessarily have anything to do with the illness. It may be that the immune system has become weaker because it "had too much to do". And secondly, there have been many psychosomatic cases. The fear of a (non-existent) SARS-CoV-2 causes stress. The body produces a lot of cortisol and that has an immunosuppressive effect. This can intensify the symptoms of flu. Nevertheless, there were no statistical figures for a global excess mortality. So no new virus, no pandemic.
I have compiled all the evidence in the Substack linked below. Some articles were written in collaboration with Dr. Mike Yeadon. If you see a mistake somewhere, it is my fault. :
https://suavek1.substack.com/
Best wishes,
Suavek
Sasha, this is in line with a piece I wrote a little while back about H5N1.
https://ogre.substack.com/p/did-viruses-suddenly-get-mad-at-humans
I ask some of the same questions. None of this, we're making virus nonsense is believable. I'm not buying it.
All of these "scientists" are just spouting BS to sound important. All whole knowing that most people don't have a clue.
But hey, everyone is making money right?
JJ Couey makes some really interesting observations of the RNA reproduction fidelity of a run of the mill coronavirus vs a lab-made circular DNA version. The latter is much more capable of infection and transmission but once in the wild, it will simmer down just like the regular kind.
His point that really stands out for me is the lack of any background signal before hand. Without that you can make all manner of claims regarding a new virus. Especially if a test shows the presence of some protein (whether you're actually sick or not).
I did get wickedly sick (with a positive test) a couple of years ago but I still can't be sure it wasn't just a seeded poisoning event, or some peculiar susceptibility to some particular entity or something else. But I'm inclined to disbelieve any simple official narrative because the data doesn't support the claims and the sheer number of lies that was propagated regarding immunology, masking, lockdowns, viruses, "vaccines" etc.. means I can put aside my own anecdotal experience and keep an open mind.
Avian flu? Nah, I'm concerned about the reactions of tyrannical sheep instead.
Thank you!
We should solve for disease X now like this https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/solving-for-disease-x?r=7oa9d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
you may find my collection of information regarding the misuse of the RT-PCR test valuable - https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/was-it-a-rt-pcr-plandemic
All you need is the jab and some boosters.
There are way too many SHEEP as I’m not jabbed and finding a non jabbed is not happening. The jabbers do SHED and being a pure blood I can only be with another pure blood as in NO SEX, NO KISSING a jabbed makes a pure blood.
Such an intriguing name similarity..........
"The sad reality is that repetition of nonsense, myths, sci-fi and outright lies - if done in sufficient daily volume - is all that’s needed to form the “reality” in the heads of the masses, no matter how absurd. The past 4 years are a testament to this. "
Recently watched hours of a "Covid Royal Commission" in a nation I will not name.
Astounding ignorance, or brainwashing, allowed obviously flawed input, even outright lies, to prevail as facts.
Very, very alarming.
Do these people really think that they are running a competent inquiry?
Or just a convincing coverup?
I thought that the fog of deception was beginning to lift.
Obviously not everywhere.
Agent orange - not Trump - I had to smile.
Thank you for the sane input and humour Sasha.
Here is a brilliant comment to the posting on the Courageous Discourse Substack:
David Lamb
Writes Cosmic Consultant
Nov 20, 2022
I'm writing this comment, Dr. McCullough only because I have great respect for your willingness to speak truth as you see it in the face of an establishment that doesn't want to hear it. I really hope you keep going with that attitude, because there's so much more to discover.
The article perfectly demonstrates how totally illogical conclusions and nonsense 'research' is passed off as scientific conclusions.
First, need I remind you that the 'vaccines' that are killing probably millions of people globally, and injuring many times more, are "well accepted" too? And I could make a long list of ideas "well accepted" that are very irrational, but I think you get the point.
The first two sentences are full of condescension, misrepresentation, and factually incorrect assertions. German virologist/microbiologist Dr Stefan Lanka has been exposing the fact that virology is all fraud for almost 30 years, so those who've actually studied the research are hardly motivated by "endless frustrations". And in fact nobody is "denying the existence" of anything. The "denying" allegation is your manipulative spin as a form of mockery. Those of us who've put in the work to go through a century of virology research and fully understand Lanka's conclusions are not denying the existence of anything. What we're saying is that there is no published research to date that demonstrates isolating a 'virus' from a sick person. It is the Rockefeller medicine establishment, which you represent, that's the party claiming there's a SARS-CoV-2 'virus' and "it" is the cause of the new disease. Therefore the burden of proof is on you and Rockefeller medicine, and that burden has not been satisfied. Because a few people have discovered the virology con, and have challenged the supposed proof that the establishment puts forward, we're labeled "virus deniers" as clueless people laugh, everyone assures each other that there's still 'consensus' that there's really a virus making everyone sick, and that's the end of it, in your view. No need to actually, honestly look at the research and answer the tough questions, because there's "consensus". What a profoundly cowardly reality...
Laboratory methods in virology do not "demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection". The claimed 'virus' is only an end product of the culture of dying cells; there is no isolated 'virus' at the beginning, so the assertion of "invasion" is pure imagination. The same 'virus' can be produced with no sick patient sample added at the beginning, which is why the "well accepted" virology lab processes never include true controls. The so-called 'viruses' are exosomes, which you probably know are encapsulated genetic debris from the process of cell death. Virology has simply perfected the methods for reliably producing cell death via added toxins and inducing cell starvation in ways that trigger the release of certain types of exosomes, which are then photographed and touted as proof of 'viruses'.
And if the exosomes are then added to a new cell culture, that also receives the same cocktail of additives that poisons and starves the cultured cells, voila, more exosomes excreted by the dying cells, and 'proof of virus transmission'! No, it's only proof that people are being willfully blind.
Surely, Dr McCullough, you must be aware of Christine Massey's two-and-a-half year FOIA campaign to find the "well accepted" proof of isolation of a SARS-CoV-2 'virus'. With over 200 responses from government health agencies and scientific institutions all over the world, not one can cite any research proof of virus isolation. Their replies do not claim Massey misunderstands what constitutes 'virus isolation'; they simply admit they have no proof of virus isolation. This includes the US CDC.
So the photos you parade here are completely meaningless, utter nonsense, because you have no idea what the photographed particles are or where they came from. Revealingly, the article says nothing about where they came from, not even in the footnotes or references. The article simply asserts that they're SARS-CoV-2 particles without evidence, and you treat it as a scientific conclusion. I'll wager that if you find out where the particles came from, they're lab creations from cultures of dying cells that had no real 'virus' isolated from a sick person added at the beginning.
Which is why you started the article with the "well accepted" theme, and mocking the "virus deniers": because that's all you have, and something deep inside of you knows it.
It will be interesting to see which way you go, Dr. McCullough. You're in an interesting predicament of either conforming to what's "well accepted" in your field (which means telling the public that the 'vaccines' are good for them and everyone should go get boosted today) and keeping your prestigious professional standing, or recognizing that 'the emperor' has no clothes and is a pathological liar, and losing the establishment endorsement deal in order to find the inconvenient truths.
I wish you the best.
-
As you can see, there is an important debate ongoing regarding the existence of viruses in general and the process of their isolation, toxicity and infectiousness.
I hope this is of interest to you.
All The Best!
Albrecht
-
Yes ... something not quite adding up on the virus identification front.
Viruses are an accepted part of modern medical practice - touch the sacred cow and you threaten the whole religion.
Well that is understandable, doctors are demi-gods, who do not like to be questioned, let alone proven wrong.
Honest investigation, discussion and debate, might threaten trust in the sacred doctor-patient relationship.
Failure to act with integrity, might be far more damaging, in the long run.
I have wondered, how many of those evil little demons called germs, have actually been isolated and identified also.
Germ warfare has been, and continues to be, massively profitable.
Then there were the virus wars, also profitable.
Now massively profitable bio-weapon warfare.
Pattern emerging here?
Well maybe, but this is all about health, not profit.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is just a health denier.
Off to a concentration camp with them!
Sorry - I meant a quarantine camp - my mistake.
Hello Sasha Latypova:
The search for the plandemic construct has unearthed a massive collusion of the Pharma industry, doctors, regulatory agencies and politics to control populations. Benevolent individuals trying to ethically frame the shortcomings of the science perpetrated such as yourself, Katherine Watt, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Didier Raoult and Dr. David Martin (to name a few) have focused on the essential fraud committed and have offered unthinkable answers. Your collective effort points to a deliberate ‘culling’ of populations and to the medicalization of as many people as possible for profit and mechanisms of control.
The debate has reached the heart of an obvious scientific conundrum: does/did the virus exist? and as an extension; do viruses as described through virology actually exist?
Back in 2022 criticizing virology elicited harsh but curious responses by individuals and institutions alike:
Dr. Peter McCullough sent out the paper by Lesley J. Calder, Thomas Calcraft, Saira Hussain, Ruth Harvey & Peter B. Rosenthal: Electron Cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 Virions to subscribers of Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake Peter’s Newsletter, also cross-posted on Courageous Discourse™ on November 17th, 2022 (Courageous Discourse Substack).
In the quoted paper the following is stated:
‘Seeing the Virus Up Close Makes It Difficult to Deny its Existence’
'A picture speaks a thousand words and should help even the most skeptical “viral denier” come onto the rational team that is trying to treat high risk patients, end ridiculous contagion control measures, and bring our world back to normal'.
I sent the below copied eMail in response to the paper to Dr.Peter McCullough and Peter Halligan, adding a comment posted by David Lamb (Cosmic Consultant):
Hello Mr. Halligan and Dr. Peter McCullough:
I have subscribed and receive your Substack newsletter.
Re: Electron Cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 Virions (Nature Magazine 17.11.22).
Your posting essentially states that the virus exists and those questioning the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus better join the ‘rational team’, since ‘seeing is believing’ and put to end the debate over its existence.
‘Seeing is believing’ is not a scientific method.
Nature Magazine, offering an ‘Open Access’ article is curious, especially regarding the ‘seeing is believing’ visualization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and, as you point out, attempting to end ‘The endless frustrations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis and pandemic response [that] has led some to push back denying existence of the virus altogether’.
The paper (and you) kindly point to the availability of viral strains of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan/Alpha/Beta/Delta) from sources in the UK (Imperial College/RVU-PHE/AHI-South Africa). Of greatest interest is the statement that the original Wuhan strain was obtained from: The Respiratory Virus Unit, Public Health England (PHE), UK and grown under Level 3 biosecurity conditions.
A virus responsible for ‘multi-millions of infections and millions of deaths world-wide’ is grown in a Francis Crick Institute Bio Lab in the UK under Biosecurity level 3 conditions to aid in the visualization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus? This admission is massive, since world-wide FOIA request asking for proof of the existence of the isolated virus were unable to receive a positive answer from multiple nationstate health regulators. The responses all stated that they do not have an isolate to make available for research. Here in this paper the growth of the isolated SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain is done in the UK at a Level 3 Biosecurity lab for a paper visualizing the SARS-CoV-2 virus, just like that.
‘All viruses were grown at the World Influenza Centre, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK under Biosafety level 3 conditions in Vero V1 cells, provided by Professor Steve Goodbourne, St George’s Hospital, University of London, UK and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) Gibco™ 41965039, with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Pen-Strep) and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS)’. —> (Steve Goodbourn is also part of the Veterinary Vaccination Network)
This is from the Francis Crick Institute website: ‘We monitor flu strains around the world and inform vaccine development, working within the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, consisting of over 150 laboratories and institutions worldwide. The WHO established the Worldwide Influenza Centre in 1948 at the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), now part of the Crick’. https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/platforms-and-facilities/worldwide-influenza-centre (Francis Crick Institute).
The quoted paper also points to the use of in ‘Vero V1’ cells in the growth process of obtained SARS-CoV-2 samples. Vero V1 cells are monkey kidney cells (aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum). The scientific debate surrounding virus isolation is at odds with the use of Vero cells, arguing contamination of the sample and pursuant inability to isolate the/a virus (if at all).
The funding of your quoted research was provided in part by Cancer Research UK, which is funded by the Wellcome Trust.
The Francis Crick Institute is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the WHO, (also funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).
Wendy Barclay is working with the Imperial College London (As is Neil Ferguson) which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Structural Biology Science Technology Platform (eNMR virtual Organization in Life Sciences) is part of the Francis Crick Institute. Life Sciences is a term coined and used by the Pharma industry.
The funding of the mRNA gene therapy medications was provided by the same sources as the paper you are quoting to convince the reader (me) that the debate about the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a proven fact (look at the EM images!). The same scientism argument has been used to convince the public to take the Covid vaccines, without safety and efficacy studies, since they stop transmission and prevent infection (clearly they do not).
Posting this paper is at odds with what you Dr.Peter McCullough are attempting to do, namely exposing the construct of the pandemic and exposing the crime of withholding known remedies for the disease Covid-19. You sir are quoting the eugenicists by posting their paper which wants to convince me to join their ‘rational team’, since ‘seeing is believing’?!
All The Best!
Albrecht
P.S: I never received an answer from Dr. Peter McCullough. I received a query from Peter Halligen asking if I received an answer.
I will post David Lambs comment separately (post is too long...)