There was absolutely NFW a credible vaccine trial was completed in months. First clue was using absolute risk as opposed to relative risk. Then, discarding the control group into the jabbed group. All a genocidal lie.
ok, this is extremely important information to bring to light so that the layperson can understand that these products were not subject to traditional controls and that you really just have to trust Big Pharma and the regulatory agencies when they say that everything is ok with these products - from the manufacturing to the clinical trials to the distribution to the administration to the reporting, etc, etc, etc.
It's very complicated and convoluted involving the DOD, Intel agencies, Congress, Fauci, the CDC, NIH, the Prep Act, the Cares Act, other acts of Congress, military countermeasures & the EUA, Big Pharma, and more.
And lawyers. Lots & lots of lawyers.
The FDA, who's main function is to protect citizens from bad foods & drugs, was sidelined by acts of Congress.
Bottom line, Congress is responsible, IMO. Which is why they remain mute.
Can you tell us where Congress is to blame for this debacle? Specific laws they passed like freedom from prosecution? If so, I'd wager there was tree-men-dous lobbying allowing Pharma to literally get away scot free by well placed bribes and even coercions and blackmails among those who vacationed on Epstein Island.
Perhaps we could put it this way. The truly "evil" impulse came from those who ordered up the various steps, knowing they were dead wrong. Congress fell prey to the "greed" impulse (and perhaps a fear/intimidation impulse). In the end, neither is excusable.
Hello Mary: Dun & Bradstreet is just one of the myriad of information sharing conglomerates that provide "services" to corporate trade and potential partners. Here's a hint from one of their pages. >>> Dun & Bradstreet’s alleged purpose - Since 1841 <<< Vision >>> “Dun & Bradstreet's mission is to create a global network of trust enabling clients to turn uncertainty into confidence, risk into opportunity, and potential into prosperity. By building on the world-class data and analytics we already bring to the market through the Dun & Bradstreet Data Cloud and the solutions it powers, our global network of trust will deliver more data and deeper insights, sourced directly, from our Worldwide Network partners, and other partners, and through new analytical models.” [End quote]
Sasha and Katherine, I note that Denise Hinton stated specifically in the authorization she signed for the Pfizer contract that all cGMP must be followed. She must have known that this was fraudulent and doesn't that open her up to some kind of criminal charges? Even if she denies (plausible deniability) that she knew that the products would not in any way be subject to those quality regulations mentioned in the authorization, wouldn't that open her up to some kind of charge of malfeasance, since it was under her oversight and she had legal/regulatory responsibility for a a quality -controlled product?
Yeah, ok, I got fooled on that one (sorry...neglected to read your post on 26Oct). Seems like they had help from the lawyers on everything documented to make themselves untouchable. It looks like the only viable pathway is the Trewhella doctrine...he had successes with this in other matters before covid.
The majority of other legal actions I've seen against these swine appear to be ham-handed (pun purely incidental). The language in many of the pleadings reads like the lawyers for the plaintiffs didn't even go to law school; they don't even cite relevant law and the judges have no trouble dismissing those cases. Or it could be a case of the lawyers saying "sure, I'd be happy to lead your 'delegation to nowhere', as long as there's a hefty retainer remitted." The saying holds true: 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
You nailed it right here: "Or it could be a case of the lawyers saying "sure, I'd be happy to lead your 'delegation to nowhere', as long as there's a hefty retainer remitted."" Yes. Exactly. Our legal classes are corrupt to the bone...
Of course any such wording/language meaning anything assumes that we have a justice system that is just and takes the law seriously. It's my impression that all evidence points to an utterly compromised/corrupt and weaponized FBI and DOJ, rendering all technicalities irrelevant. Or am I simply being cynical?
I believe that it is all part of the secret society that has been working for over 250 years to depopulate the world and begin to change it to their agenda
Scam of the century!!!!!! Making up the rules and breaking the rules and twisting it all up with the logic of madmen. Is this Mengele mafia nonsense the intent of Congress? Probably not FDA.
i)no clinical trial today exists showing that the vaccine reduce hospitalization/death ii)relative risk, not absolute risk reduction used to fool you of benefit iii)stopped early for benefit as was done is a red flag as could have stopped at a random high of benefit and had it (study) continued to sample size it would have shown no benefit iv)3000 participants data removed by Pfizer from calculations and our best-case worst-case remodelling shows the relative risk reduction would have fallen from 95% to 20%, not even the 50% agreed threshold v)short duration to properly assess benefit or harms vi) small number of outcome events e.g. 170 in Pfizer study is massive risk of biased estimates of effect and actually breaks randomization vii)serious concerns with the reported randomization sequence, the concealment of the sequence (allocation concealment) viii)improper blinding of adjudicator of outcomes etc. thus sub-optimal methods ix)use of improper patient-important outcomes e.g. use of proxy sub-optimal ‘antibody levels etc.’ x)short duration of follow-up to detect any meaningful differences or effect xi)use of immuno-bridging as a means to assess immune response which is pure junk science and methods xii) improper statistical methods to adjust/control for both ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ confounders (competing distorting explanations) xiii)giving the placebo group the vaccine which doomed the study (in short, we have no credible comparative effectiveness research available)
All just slippery charlatans who have been at this forever. Thanks for all of this important pieces. Fast track criminality went to warp speed eugenics.
Wonderful to listen to you 2 friends share thoughts and research 👏👏thank you for the privilege 🙏
Do you know who asked the question of why that particular 'authorisation' pathway was chosen (resulting in the recorded answer that you quote)? Imo that person knew / had realised what was going on and wanted the answer recorded? Or does knowing their name put them at risk? 🙏
I have a great idea for a screenplay. If anyone in Hollywood has any contacts, I’d appreciate it if your people would call my people. Since, as Sasha Latipova put it,
FDA "Approval" for Covid-19 Vaccines Was Fake - based non-investigational use of a non-experimental unapproved substance (a poison)
I thought a plot based around a ‘turnabout is fair play’ theme would be timely and a real crowd pleaser. So here’s my basic pitch:
A researcher discovers that the so-called vaccines were never intended to be ‘drugs,’ not even mislabeled gene therapies masquerading as drugs, but rather bioweapons to be unleashed on the world. The finer details of who ultimately was behind this global cull in not as important as convincing folks of the realization that someone is trying to kill, sicken and sterilize large swaths of the planet.
This conscientious scientist, working in government lab, tries to blow the whistle through all the proper channels only to realize that the system is designed to identify, isolate, discredit and even jail such whistleblowers, not protect them despite the ironically-named ‘Whistleblower Protection Act’ legislation designed to do just the opposite.
After being marginalized in his job, then fired for failing to take the lethal injection, he begins working independently to isolate the pathogenicity of the mRNA jabs and in so doing, discovers an inexpensive countermeasure to prevent ‘vaccine injury.’
The protagonist now decides to offer the cure for ‘vaccine injury’ a using a sliding ‘justice’ scale. Those who were denied organ transplants, fired, refused admission to college, etc. are now at the very front of the line. Those who had a legal and or ethical duty to either stop this madness or were in on the conspiracy from the beginning, are black listed for life (death). They will never receive the antidote. They also cannot force the protagonist to supply the cure to them because he’s a private charity with a set criteria for treating the most aggrieved first; it’s a bit like facebook reserving the right to ban people for life.
Well, the first part of your story is very similar to "Don't Look Up," where earth is threatened with imminent destruction by a giant meteor, but the public yawns as the discovering scientists struggle to convince the public that the danger is real. Of course, Hollywood meant it as an allegory for "climate change," but your telling, with "vaccines" standing in for "climate change" actually fits the plot better.
You think Leonardo DiCaprio will sign on for the remake?
Thank you for continuing to pursue these truths. … Your art is rendered with such originality and emotion. I don’t know how you can produce these creative works and still find time to investigate and expose the biggest deceit of millennia.
Most drug approvals are fake in one manner or another. Otherwise, why does the FDA recall between 4,000-5,000 drugs every year? Big pharma wants to get as many drugs on the market and into as many people as possible before it is discovered that these drugs are harmful or useless.
There was absolutely NFW a credible vaccine trial was completed in months. First clue was using absolute risk as opposed to relative risk. Then, discarding the control group into the jabbed group. All a genocidal lie.
I assume you mean they used relative risk instead of absolute risk.
Must've been my dyslexia acting up.
There was no testing, no pharmacovigilance... even the AI recognized this is a total disaster!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/system-failure-ai-exposes-zero-government
Hey Pfizer! - I am still in the control group! - Interested? - I work cheep. Contact me c/o the dynamic duo Sasha and Katherine.
ok, this is extremely important information to bring to light so that the layperson can understand that these products were not subject to traditional controls and that you really just have to trust Big Pharma and the regulatory agencies when they say that everything is ok with these products - from the manufacturing to the clinical trials to the distribution to the administration to the reporting, etc, etc, etc.
It's very complicated and convoluted involving the DOD, Intel agencies, Congress, Fauci, the CDC, NIH, the Prep Act, the Cares Act, other acts of Congress, military countermeasures & the EUA, Big Pharma, and more.
And lawyers. Lots & lots of lawyers.
The FDA, who's main function is to protect citizens from bad foods & drugs, was sidelined by acts of Congress.
Bottom line, Congress is responsible, IMO. Which is why they remain mute.
Can you tell us where Congress is to blame for this debacle? Specific laws they passed like freedom from prosecution? If so, I'd wager there was tree-men-dous lobbying allowing Pharma to literally get away scot free by well placed bribes and even coercions and blackmails among those who vacationed on Epstein Island.
Watch the video and then go to Katherine's substack but prepared to read a lot or listen at least. It's all there.
Perhaps we could put it this way. The truly "evil" impulse came from those who ordered up the various steps, knowing they were dead wrong. Congress fell prey to the "greed" impulse (and perhaps a fear/intimidation impulse). In the end, neither is excusable.
I agree that the public needs to be educated. Here's a bit of education. >>>
Dun & Bradstreet registered numbers:
Agencies: United States Government - 052714196
US Department of Defense (DOD)-030421397
US Department of Justice (DOJ)-011669674
US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)-Office of the Secretary-112463521
US Department of Homeland Security-932394187
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-057944910
US Public Health Service (USPHS)-039294216
National Institutes of Health (NIH)-061232000
US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)-927645465
US Food & Drug Administration (FDA)-138182175
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)-878865674
National Security Agency (NSA)-617395215
US Department of the Treasury-026661067
The list goes on and on. Corporate syndication is covert racketeering, plain and simple.
What do “Dun and Bradstreet registered numbers” mean?
Hello Mary: Dun & Bradstreet is just one of the myriad of information sharing conglomerates that provide "services" to corporate trade and potential partners. Here's a hint from one of their pages. >>> Dun & Bradstreet’s alleged purpose - Since 1841 <<< Vision >>> “Dun & Bradstreet's mission is to create a global network of trust enabling clients to turn uncertainty into confidence, risk into opportunity, and potential into prosperity. By building on the world-class data and analytics we already bring to the market through the Dun & Bradstreet Data Cloud and the solutions it powers, our global network of trust will deliver more data and deeper insights, sourced directly, from our Worldwide Network partners, and other partners, and through new analytical models.” [End quote]
Where have we heard this kind of sales rhetoric before? Note the inception date of 1841. >>> https://www.dnb.com/about-us/company.html
Whoa! New territory for me. Thank you for taking the time to explain this. A part of me goes, “how can this be?”
Sasha that painting is absolutely spectacular. Gave me chills.
Sasha and Katherine, I note that Denise Hinton stated specifically in the authorization she signed for the Pfizer contract that all cGMP must be followed. She must have known that this was fraudulent and doesn't that open her up to some kind of criminal charges? Even if she denies (plausible deniability) that she knew that the products would not in any way be subject to those quality regulations mentioned in the authorization, wouldn't that open her up to some kind of charge of malfeasance, since it was under her oversight and she had legal/regulatory responsibility for a a quality -controlled product?
possible, yes.
I admire your optimism!
Yeah, ok, I got fooled on that one (sorry...neglected to read your post on 26Oct). Seems like they had help from the lawyers on everything documented to make themselves untouchable. It looks like the only viable pathway is the Trewhella doctrine...he had successes with this in other matters before covid.
The majority of other legal actions I've seen against these swine appear to be ham-handed (pun purely incidental). The language in many of the pleadings reads like the lawyers for the plaintiffs didn't even go to law school; they don't even cite relevant law and the judges have no trouble dismissing those cases. Or it could be a case of the lawyers saying "sure, I'd be happy to lead your 'delegation to nowhere', as long as there's a hefty retainer remitted." The saying holds true: 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
You nailed it right here: "Or it could be a case of the lawyers saying "sure, I'd be happy to lead your 'delegation to nowhere', as long as there's a hefty retainer remitted."" Yes. Exactly. Our legal classes are corrupt to the bone...
Of course any such wording/language meaning anything assumes that we have a justice system that is just and takes the law seriously. It's my impression that all evidence points to an utterly compromised/corrupt and weaponized FBI and DOJ, rendering all technicalities irrelevant. Or am I simply being cynical?
I believe that it is all part of the secret society that has been working for over 250 years to depopulate the world and begin to change it to their agenda
Agree. Sadly a full 10% of our church congregation has died since June. I kid you not. 8 deaths of church members out of 80. Since June.
sorry to hear that.
Seems crazy, but I struggle to find a better explanation.
Scam of the century!!!!!! Making up the rules and breaking the rules and twisting it all up with the logic of madmen. Is this Mengele mafia nonsense the intent of Congress? Probably not FDA.
Ask who asked the question: 'how can we reduce the costs of bringing a vaccine to market, along with reducing lead times by years?'
Those two questions are all that it took to dream up this scam.
Keeping the price of products high whilst cutting all the costs of product development, not to mention the regulatory burden.
And this question was probably in their minds as well - “how can we start forcing all children AND adults to take our poison, uh, er, vaccines?”
Brandy Vaughn (RIP) tried to warn us that they were coming after adults next.
i)no clinical trial today exists showing that the vaccine reduce hospitalization/death ii)relative risk, not absolute risk reduction used to fool you of benefit iii)stopped early for benefit as was done is a red flag as could have stopped at a random high of benefit and had it (study) continued to sample size it would have shown no benefit iv)3000 participants data removed by Pfizer from calculations and our best-case worst-case remodelling shows the relative risk reduction would have fallen from 95% to 20%, not even the 50% agreed threshold v)short duration to properly assess benefit or harms vi) small number of outcome events e.g. 170 in Pfizer study is massive risk of biased estimates of effect and actually breaks randomization vii)serious concerns with the reported randomization sequence, the concealment of the sequence (allocation concealment) viii)improper blinding of adjudicator of outcomes etc. thus sub-optimal methods ix)use of improper patient-important outcomes e.g. use of proxy sub-optimal ‘antibody levels etc.’ x)short duration of follow-up to detect any meaningful differences or effect xi)use of immuno-bridging as a means to assess immune response which is pure junk science and methods xii) improper statistical methods to adjust/control for both ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ confounders (competing distorting explanations) xiii)giving the placebo group the vaccine which doomed the study (in short, we have no credible comparative effectiveness research available)
Thank both of you for your work and research. You have brought valuable information to the world.
All just slippery charlatans who have been at this forever. Thanks for all of this important pieces. Fast track criminality went to warp speed eugenics.
charlatan ='someone who professes knowledge in (i.e.) medicine he does not have'. These people know EXACTLY what they are doing.
Yet,the "Sheep" and companies, bought into the Mandates,getting "Vaxxed", and Boosters, now paying with their lives...
Wonderful to listen to you 2 friends share thoughts and research 👏👏thank you for the privilege 🙏
Do you know who asked the question of why that particular 'authorisation' pathway was chosen (resulting in the recorded answer that you quote)? Imo that person knew / had realised what was going on and wanted the answer recorded? Or does knowing their name put them at risk? 🙏
it's part of the transcript - Dr. Kurilla (I think with FDA, but I will check).
Expect more Actors and Entertainers, to perish, believing the lies about; "Safe & Effective".
Are You Listening Hollywood?
I have a great idea for a screenplay. If anyone in Hollywood has any contacts, I’d appreciate it if your people would call my people. Since, as Sasha Latipova put it,
FDA "Approval" for Covid-19 Vaccines Was Fake - based non-investigational use of a non-experimental unapproved substance (a poison)
I thought a plot based around a ‘turnabout is fair play’ theme would be timely and a real crowd pleaser. So here’s my basic pitch:
A researcher discovers that the so-called vaccines were never intended to be ‘drugs,’ not even mislabeled gene therapies masquerading as drugs, but rather bioweapons to be unleashed on the world. The finer details of who ultimately was behind this global cull in not as important as convincing folks of the realization that someone is trying to kill, sicken and sterilize large swaths of the planet.
This conscientious scientist, working in government lab, tries to blow the whistle through all the proper channels only to realize that the system is designed to identify, isolate, discredit and even jail such whistleblowers, not protect them despite the ironically-named ‘Whistleblower Protection Act’ legislation designed to do just the opposite.
After being marginalized in his job, then fired for failing to take the lethal injection, he begins working independently to isolate the pathogenicity of the mRNA jabs and in so doing, discovers an inexpensive countermeasure to prevent ‘vaccine injury.’
The protagonist now decides to offer the cure for ‘vaccine injury’ a using a sliding ‘justice’ scale. Those who were denied organ transplants, fired, refused admission to college, etc. are now at the very front of the line. Those who had a legal and or ethical duty to either stop this madness or were in on the conspiracy from the beginning, are black listed for life (death). They will never receive the antidote. They also cannot force the protagonist to supply the cure to them because he’s a private charity with a set criteria for treating the most aggrieved first; it’s a bit like facebook reserving the right to ban people for life.
Well, the first part of your story is very similar to "Don't Look Up," where earth is threatened with imminent destruction by a giant meteor, but the public yawns as the discovering scientists struggle to convince the public that the danger is real. Of course, Hollywood meant it as an allegory for "climate change," but your telling, with "vaccines" standing in for "climate change" actually fits the plot better.
You think Leonardo DiCaprio will sign on for the remake?
Only if he agrees to fly coach!
Thank you for continuing to pursue these truths. … Your art is rendered with such originality and emotion. I don’t know how you can produce these creative works and still find time to investigate and expose the biggest deceit of millennia.
Definitely a poison, not a virus!
Most drug approvals are fake in one manner or another. Otherwise, why does the FDA recall between 4,000-5,000 drugs every year? Big pharma wants to get as many drugs on the market and into as many people as possible before it is discovered that these drugs are harmful or useless.
they don't recall 5K drugs a year, where are you getting this info from?
Data shows 912 recalls in fiscal year '22. Most were violations of good manufacturing practices.
Do you have any proofs re: "4,000-5,000 drugs every year"? Links please.