Discussion with Katherine Watt
There was absolutely NFW a credible vaccine trial was completed in months. First clue was using absolute risk as opposed to relative risk. Then, discarding the control group into the jabbed group. All a genocidal lie.
ok, this is extremely important information to bring to light so that the layperson can understand that these products were not subject to traditional controls and that you really just have to trust Big Pharma and the regulatory agencies when they say that everything is ok with these products - from the manufacturing to the clinical trials to the distribution to the administration to the reporting, etc, etc, etc.
Sasha that painting is absolutely spectacular. Gave me chills.
Sasha and Katherine, I note that Denise Hinton stated specifically in the authorization she signed for the Pfizer contract that all cGMP must be followed. She must have known that this was fraudulent and doesn't that open her up to some kind of criminal charges? Even if she denies (plausible deniability) that she knew that the products would not in any way be subject to those quality regulations mentioned in the authorization, wouldn't that open her up to some kind of charge of malfeasance, since it was under her oversight and she had legal/regulatory responsibility for a a quality -controlled product?
I believe that it is all part of the secret society that has been working for over 250 years to depopulate the world and begin to change it to their agenda
Scam of the century!!!!!! Making up the rules and breaking the rules and twisting it all up with the logic of madmen. Is this Mengele mafia nonsense the intent of Congress? Probably not FDA.
i)no clinical trial today exists showing that the vaccine reduce hospitalization/death ii)relative risk, not absolute risk reduction used to fool you of benefit iii)stopped early for benefit as was done is a red flag as could have stopped at a random high of benefit and had it (study) continued to sample size it would have shown no benefit iv)3000 participants data removed by Pfizer from calculations and our best-case worst-case remodelling shows the relative risk reduction would have fallen from 95% to 20%, not even the 50% agreed threshold v)short duration to properly assess benefit or harms vi) small number of outcome events e.g. 170 in Pfizer study is massive risk of biased estimates of effect and actually breaks randomization vii)serious concerns with the reported randomization sequence, the concealment of the sequence (allocation concealment) viii)improper blinding of adjudicator of outcomes etc. thus sub-optimal methods ix)use of improper patient-important outcomes e.g. use of proxy sub-optimal ‘antibody levels etc.’ x)short duration of follow-up to detect any meaningful differences or effect xi)use of immuno-bridging as a means to assess immune response which is pure junk science and methods xii) improper statistical methods to adjust/control for both ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ confounders (competing distorting explanations) xiii)giving the placebo group the vaccine which doomed the study (in short, we have no credible comparative effectiveness research available)
Thank both of you for your work and research. You have brought valuable information to the world.
Yet,the "Sheep" and companies, bought into the Mandates,getting "Vaxxed", and Boosters, now paying with their lives...
All just slippery charlatans who have been at this forever. Thanks for all of this important pieces. Fast track criminality went to warp speed eugenics.
Expect more Actors and Entertainers, to perish, believing the lies about; "Safe & Effective".
Wonderful to listen to you 2 friends share thoughts and research 👏👏thank you for the privilege 🙏
Do you know who asked the question of why that particular 'authorisation' pathway was chosen (resulting in the recorded answer that you quote)? Imo that person knew / had realised what was going on and wanted the answer recorded? Or does knowing their name put them at risk? 🙏
Thank you for continuing to pursue these truths. … Your art is rendered with such originality and emotion. I don’t know how you can produce these creative works and still find time to investigate and expose the biggest deceit of millennia.
Definitely a poison, not a virus!
Most drug approvals are fake in one manner or another. Otherwise, why does the FDA recall between 4,000-5,000 drugs every year? Big pharma wants to get as many drugs on the market and into as many people as possible before it is discovered that these drugs are harmful or useless.
Are You Listening Hollywood?
I have a great idea for a screenplay. If anyone in Hollywood has any contacts, I’d appreciate it if your people would call my people. Since, as Sasha Latipova put it,
FDA "Approval" for Covid-19 Vaccines Was Fake - based non-investigational use of a non-experimental unapproved substance (a poison)
I thought a plot based around a ‘turnabout is fair play’ theme would be timely and a real crowd pleaser. So here’s my basic pitch:
A researcher discovers that the so-called vaccines were never intended to be ‘drugs,’ not even mislabeled gene therapies masquerading as drugs, but rather bioweapons to be unleashed on the world. The finer details of who ultimately was behind this global cull in not as important as convincing folks of the realization that someone is trying to kill, sicken and sterilize large swaths of the planet.
This conscientious scientist, working in government lab, tries to blow the whistle through all the proper channels only to realize that the system is designed to identify, isolate, discredit and even jail such whistleblowers, not protect them despite the ironically-named ‘Whistleblower Protection Act’ legislation designed to do just the opposite.
After being marginalized in his job, then fired for failing to take the lethal injection, he begins working independently to isolate the pathogenicity of the mRNA jabs and in so doing, discovers an inexpensive countermeasure to prevent ‘vaccine injury.’
The protagonist now decides to offer the cure for ‘vaccine injury’ a using a sliding ‘justice’ scale. Those who were denied organ transplants, fired, refused admission to college, etc. are now at the very front of the line. Those who had a legal and or ethical duty to either stop this madness or were in on the conspiracy from the beginning, are black listed for life (death). They will never receive the antidote. They also cannot force the protagonist to supply the cure to them because he’s a private charity with a set criteria for treating the most aggrieved first; it’s a bit like facebook reserving the right to ban people for life.