Why hasn't anyone used the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989?
To implement the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction, by prohibiting certain conduct relating to biological weapons, and for other purposes.
(2) the term `toxin' means, whatever its origin or method of production--
`(A) any poisonous substance produced by a living organism; or
`(B) any poisonous isomer, homolog, or derivative of such a substance;
`(3) the term `delivery system' means--
`(A) any apparatus, equipment, device, or means of delivery specifically designed to deliver or disseminate a biological agent, toxin, or vector; or
`(B) any vector; and
`(4) the term `vector' means a living organism capable of carrying a biological agent or toxin to a host.'.
"We know we need to break the law to put this poison on the market, so, we need to make a parallel universe where the illegal things are called legal and we are good. Let’s call it EUA. Stroke of genius, I must admit."
This summarizes exactly what they have been doing at all levels on so many things: creating parallel universes where it is legal. The fig leaf pretense is covered and the killbox is erected. Nits makes lice and all. I've always bristled at anyone who makes the legal argument that it is about just this poison19 vaccine or that this is about just Covid: that almost emboldens them for an entirely new sham pretense for next round...
i worry that if any of these misguided if well-intentioned lawsuits gets traction, it will set a dangerous precedent - they all seem to buy into the argument that there was this scary scary pathogen and no mention of how it always mysteriously stopped at the state line
EUA measures are neither investigational nor experimental but this one is a prototype. meaning that it's the first in a planned series.
we've been warned.
love that kettle and the story it tells. i'll never look at a still life the same way again - though my favorites so far are all portraits
Gosh...It’s almost like the lawsuits are intentional distractions....Nodding at you, Texas v Pfizer. Gonna go ahead and try Pfizer Bad again to see if maybe this time a square peg will fit through a round hole.
The general public doesn't want to know. That is a far bigger problem than the poison vaccines, the EUA or the FDA, and other three-letter agencies like the DOD. If the people, democrats, republicans, libertarians, independents, and anyone else were livid and making a scene, maybe we could turn the tables. Unfortunately, all I see are sheep afraid to make any waves.
You might not be an attorney but, you sure could be. And, in some capacity you should consult them. I grew up in a house full of them. Most think they are smarter than they are. They need help on this!
In Australia we didn't have any fancy EUA to fall back on so the government simply "authorised the administration of a poison". Straight up, right there in the wording.
AUTHORISATION TO SUPPLY OR ADMINISTER A POISON [SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) VACCINE - COVID VACCINATORS - CHILD AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICE] (No. 3) 2021
1. I, Dr Andrew Robertson, Chief Health Officer (WA), acting pursuant to sections 197 and 198 of the Public Health Act 2016 (WA) [the Act] that gives power, for the purposes of emergency management during a public health state of emergency, to authorise a person to supply or administer a poison, hereby authorise the person(s) occupying the class of position in Column 1 of the attached Schedule to perform the statutory functions in Column 2 of the attached Schedule, subject to the conditions, limitations or restrictions (if any) set out in Column 3 of the attached schedule.
Dec 3, 2023·edited Dec 3, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova
Attorneys are experts at law, but applying the laws to something so complex is not easy, they need someone like you on their team for guidance.
With that said, as someone that worked in the electronics field and watching corps like Qualcomm create lawsuits from their lame patent library successfully because.the judge didnt understand the subject matter, so it works all way around.
Look how stupid our Supreme Court can be. Some of the judges are retarded.
Dec 3, 2023·edited Dec 3, 2023Liked by Sasha Latypova
It seems like they have begun deliberately misguiding / confusing / distracting people and manipulating data, perhaps to discredit the medical freedom movement. And I have also begun seeing a similar pattern in the disclosure movement. 'Seemingly' getting things right but if you carefully examine the details, it's off the point and luring ppl into a direction in favour of the puppet masters ' narratives. And I believe they are very competent in carrying out 'the business.'
Sasha, you and Katherine Watt are to be commended for discovering this ghastly plot by our own government. What do you think would happen if the American people learned about this? They would be outraged enough to demand that those laws enacted by the bad guys be overturned by Congress, and justice served. The problem is that the gatekeepers, the MSM, are not going to ever give you airtime to reach a wider audience. Yes, you and many other truthtellers are allowed to write at Substack but, let’s face it, you are preaching to the choir here, no disrespect intended.
What we need is an honest political figure or celebrity, who is on our side, to get the ball rolling, and give a simple statement of the facts. I was thinking of RFK jr. as one example. The MSM will have to report it and that would intrigue others to do their own search, thus getting the information out. The evidence is there in black and white in the paper trail of the DoD’s ordering “countermeasures” and the unconstitutional laws that were put into place secretly over decades. It’s all there for anyone to see, thanks to your “due diligence” in uncovering them.
Our strength is in our numbers. There are millions of us but only a few of them. It’s time to awaken the sleeping giant.
I was again censored in the U.K. parliament related event tonight.
It was claimed there were technical issues with external links, such that McCulloughs speech was lost,
But mine wasn’t through a link. I’d recorded it & sent it 4-5 days ago. I verified that it played ok at the event end.
Especially galling because I was also censored at the weekend at the Croatian parliamentarians event.
Two weeks earlier, at the AfD organised conference in Germany, I was also censored.
They most really be concerned about what I plannedI to say.
Why hasn't anyone used the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989?
To implement the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction, by prohibiting certain conduct relating to biological weapons, and for other purposes.
(2) the term `toxin' means, whatever its origin or method of production--
`(A) any poisonous substance produced by a living organism; or
`(B) any poisonous isomer, homolog, or derivative of such a substance;
`(3) the term `delivery system' means--
`(A) any apparatus, equipment, device, or means of delivery specifically designed to deliver or disseminate a biological agent, toxin, or vector; or
`(B) any vector; and
`(4) the term `vector' means a living organism capable of carrying a biological agent or toxin to a host.'.
"We know we need to break the law to put this poison on the market, so, we need to make a parallel universe where the illegal things are called legal and we are good. Let’s call it EUA. Stroke of genius, I must admit."
This summarizes exactly what they have been doing at all levels on so many things: creating parallel universes where it is legal. The fig leaf pretense is covered and the killbox is erected. Nits makes lice and all. I've always bristled at anyone who makes the legal argument that it is about just this poison19 vaccine or that this is about just Covid: that almost emboldens them for an entirely new sham pretense for next round...
i worry that if any of these misguided if well-intentioned lawsuits gets traction, it will set a dangerous precedent - they all seem to buy into the argument that there was this scary scary pathogen and no mention of how it always mysteriously stopped at the state line
EUA measures are neither investigational nor experimental but this one is a prototype. meaning that it's the first in a planned series.
we've been warned.
love that kettle and the story it tells. i'll never look at a still life the same way again - though my favorites so far are all portraits
🔥🔥🔥thank you Sasha.
How many different ways can this be said???
Gosh...It’s almost like the lawsuits are intentional distractions....Nodding at you, Texas v Pfizer. Gonna go ahead and try Pfizer Bad again to see if maybe this time a square peg will fit through a round hole.
I think I love your Still LIfe paintings the best of all your art pieces. Thank you for all the work you do to expose the madness.
The general public doesn't want to know. That is a far bigger problem than the poison vaccines, the EUA or the FDA, and other three-letter agencies like the DOD. If the people, democrats, republicans, libertarians, independents, and anyone else were livid and making a scene, maybe we could turn the tables. Unfortunately, all I see are sheep afraid to make any waves.
You might not be an attorney but, you sure could be. And, in some capacity you should consult them. I grew up in a house full of them. Most think they are smarter than they are. They need help on this!
In Australia we didn't have any fancy EUA to fall back on so the government simply "authorised the administration of a poison". Straight up, right there in the wording.
AUTHORISATION TO SUPPLY OR ADMINISTER A POISON [SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) VACCINE - COVID VACCINATORS - CHILD AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICE] (No. 3) 2021
1. I, Dr Andrew Robertson, Chief Health Officer (WA), acting pursuant to sections 197 and 198 of the Public Health Act 2016 (WA) [the Act] that gives power, for the purposes of emergency management during a public health state of emergency, to authorise a person to supply or administer a poison, hereby authorise the person(s) occupying the class of position in Column 1 of the attached Schedule to perform the statutory functions in Column 2 of the attached Schedule, subject to the conditions, limitations or restrictions (if any) set out in Column 3 of the attached schedule.
15th July 2021.
Etc, etc.
And while we're at it, we might examine state laws prohibiting the practice of medicine without a license;-)
It looks like calling the shot a poison is what should be addressed.
EUA for a BIOWEAPON?
.
The Chronically Vaccinated
Are Lying To Themselves.
They Can Never Be Trusted Again
About Anything.
.
Attorneys are experts at law, but applying the laws to something so complex is not easy, they need someone like you on their team for guidance.
With that said, as someone that worked in the electronics field and watching corps like Qualcomm create lawsuits from their lame patent library successfully because.the judge didnt understand the subject matter, so it works all way around.
Look how stupid our Supreme Court can be. Some of the judges are retarded.
It seems like they have begun deliberately misguiding / confusing / distracting people and manipulating data, perhaps to discredit the medical freedom movement. And I have also begun seeing a similar pattern in the disclosure movement. 'Seemingly' getting things right but if you carefully examine the details, it's off the point and luring ppl into a direction in favour of the puppet masters ' narratives. And I believe they are very competent in carrying out 'the business.'
Sasha, you and Katherine Watt are to be commended for discovering this ghastly plot by our own government. What do you think would happen if the American people learned about this? They would be outraged enough to demand that those laws enacted by the bad guys be overturned by Congress, and justice served. The problem is that the gatekeepers, the MSM, are not going to ever give you airtime to reach a wider audience. Yes, you and many other truthtellers are allowed to write at Substack but, let’s face it, you are preaching to the choir here, no disrespect intended.
What we need is an honest political figure or celebrity, who is on our side, to get the ball rolling, and give a simple statement of the facts. I was thinking of RFK jr. as one example. The MSM will have to report it and that would intrigue others to do their own search, thus getting the information out. The evidence is there in black and white in the paper trail of the DoD’s ordering “countermeasures” and the unconstitutional laws that were put into place secretly over decades. It’s all there for anyone to see, thanks to your “due diligence” in uncovering them.
Our strength is in our numbers. There are millions of us but only a few of them. It’s time to awaken the sleeping giant.