Ever think that the posion vax potions are even more potent with other toxins we ingest and topically apply? Why compound the dangers? Many or most of processed products at grocers and pharmacies are unnecessarily junked up with ingredients that are deemed OK in certain amounts but which could compromise our health in small but significant ways, depending on our individual vulnerabilities and the other products we use that could add up to adverse synergistic effects.
" George Washington ordered the inoculation of his troops against smallpox in 1777 when he was fighting the revolutionary war." Thus says Google so it must be true:).
George Washington was a freemason
Edward Jenner the father of vaccination was a freemason
Benjamin Franklin who founded the United States was a freemason
John Hancock who signed the Declaration of Independence was a freemason
Every US president up to and including DJT has been a freemason
I don't take much stock in studies that expose animals to doses many times higher than they would ever be exposed to normally because I know the dose makes the poison. There is no good or necessary thing that cannot be made harmful or even fatal if you get too much of it. Even water can be fatal if you drink too much and people have died this way.
Researchers administer mega doses of the studied substance because they want something to happen quickly so they can collect their grant money and move on to the next grant. But in so doing, they sabotage their own experiments and render the results meaningless.
Jay, I would be careful with "The dose makes the poison". I used to think that because everybody said it. It is used to convince us to take low dose poisons known as medicine. and to describe the ensuing bad symptoms as "side effects". There is a good discussion in "What Really Makes You Ill" about this - the Paracelsus fallacy. The fact that some poisons accumulate over a lifetime from incremental small doses renders this a doubtful concept. e.g. mercury, fluoride, aluminum. We know that "even water can kill us". But we need water - we don't need mercury, fluoride or aluminum. There is no safe "dose" of mercury. But check out that reference which explains it better than I can in a few words. Good luck
Dave meet my mother, 25 meds a day and she never forgot happy hour which could last the whole evening, she could not recall taking her meds, she repeated them, this is anecdotal she got 90 years old. What I learned from it well water can kill but in some beer can save lives. No I don’t take her as an example but the cups of mother bear are not that indestructible.
Very informative, once again, we see the drastic difference of ingesting toxins ( Glyphosate) versus injecting (vaccines) in muscle that invariably gets into the blood stream-Charles Richet! Thank you, Sasha.
But, does it have to be an either/ or choice? What about "no" to injectables and "no" to ingestibles that are somewhat to very toxic, as long as we can access and afford relatively clean products... and to stock up on them?
When the food and herbal naturopath supply lines get interrupted in the near future, we won't have any choice, unless we garden organically and have laying hens and are very good and lucky at these healthy survival endeavors.
Exactly! We're close to getting a halt on the clot-shots (should've had one the year before last). We need a ban on glyphosate, too, because that is disabling--and killing--many people who've not even had a COVID vaccine.
In 1986 I went back to school & studied Horticulture. One of the things I learned very early on was Glyphosate ( Roundup)should only be applied on calm dry days. Not windy or rainy.
I learned to wear protective clothing and to not administer on windy days. In 1986 “they” already were saying to use with caution since GLYPHOSATE could cause cancer.
Ohhh. Bioburden over lifetime and synergistic effects. It's the next step. Gyphosate and excitotoxins and vaccines should be interesting. The true American compromised life? Maybe add in mandatory sedentary lifestyle too!
Can't parse the sarc, but why are we accepting a so-called modern lifestyle of better living through basically unaccountable lab chemistry by corporations protected by Government that is incorporated into our food chain or injected into us directly, as if we were dumb livestock or weeds?
I'm in agreement with you Sasha. I was told a couple of days ago, by my doctor, that surgery I was recently referred for, (iatrogenic hearing loss) a recommended cochlear implant, would necessitate a full course of "vaccinations". I told her that I would accept death before "vaccination" of any kind. I maintain that covert or forced vaccinations upon my person would excite an extremely violent response to the perp that attempts such a vile act. Poisoning the food supply covertly with vaccines, as has been suggested, as a method of 'vaccinating the entire population without knowledge or consent', would be the ultimate trigger for retribution with prejudice. It is ZERO TOLERANCE and no mercy for vaccinators from my perspective. I know of a case recently where a woman was "vaccinated" while under sedation for surgery, in hospital. When she obtained the records, and discovered that she had been "vaccinated" while unconscious, against her will...she sued the hospital. Outcome is pending. I doubt I would exercise such restraint.
Hi Judith. The case involves Thunder Bay Regional Hospital, and the woman was in surgery, under sedation, when she was injected with Covid vaccine, without her consent. There is no link to share that I am aware of. I understand this case is still ongoing. I have not yet heard of any resolution of the matter.
the proper mouse gyphosate study should have a group who've been jabbed with, say, pfizer or moderna or sputnik or whatever, versus unjabbed mice. right?
seems reasonable to conclude that glyphosate or any other toxin for that matter would be more toxic to humans in general, for that reason
the power of that angel leaves me at a loss for words. may we all be that fearless
Correct! I would love to see such a study. However, we already know that to make a rat or mouse line that reliably generate cancer (for studies of cancer drugs) "the $cience(TM" method is to vaccinate them. LOL. magic.
I think enough mice have suffered and died to show the same thing: most mice show some sort of glyphosate reaction but there may never be a hundred mice in which ten show the same reaction, so statistical studies of animals lack something, in regard to glyphosate. It's possible for some people not to see the obvious conclusion that glyphosate reactions vary among individuals.
I want to see studies that focus on more clearly understood questions, like: Are there patients who have chronic bleeding conditions that are *not* dramatically affected by glyphosate? Most of us are dramatically affected. And people who want to remain in denial about this should have to handle the samples, and see for themselves the lack of visible blood when patients have not been exposed to glyphosate and the tablespoonfuls of blood when we have. The blood is not what costs money to measure; the glyphosate is.
Thank you for this. The painting is stunning. Yes, the jabs are the culprit. We can literally see it all around: before jabs: healthy, after jabs: sick. Can a compromised gut microbiome make a person more susceptible to vaccine injury though? Glyphosate is, among other things, patented as an antibiotic.
My children had surgery and were given antibiotics immediately after birth. They are also vaccine injured. We 'manage' vaccine injury through a healthy, natural diet (with lots of kefir, sauerkraut, kombucha etc.) realizing the injury will not be cured by food.
vaccines are the primary method to compromise gut biome permanently. If someone has a gut biome issue due to an occasional exposure to glyphosate or some other toxic chemical substance via digestion - that "washes out" after the exposure is stopped. And gut biome recovers. When vaccines create anaphylaxis (as the all do by injecting foreign proteins into the blood stream) - this creates permanent damage to the gut and it's biome. Which is may be possible to "manage" and restore somewhat over a long period of time, but it is a much much more significant damage vs. via digestion.
Sasha, Christopher Exley aka ' Mr Aluminium', on his Substack is questioning why the Aluminium content in Glyphosate has not been highlighted as the main, or only, carcinogenic ingredient.
Could it be because the Aluminium industry as a whole, is huge ?
The most used in consumer products, as a subtle depopulation poison, ahead of Fluoride and Mercury.
Think of a child with a skinned knee. Of course the knee recovers. Now imagine someone deliberately skinning the child's knee--maybe alternate knees on alternate days, maybe different sides of the knee--but skinning the knee every day. It will continue to TRY to recover. It will not be a normal, functional knee.
We know that celiacs' ancestors had a more vulnerable biome than 9,999 out of 10,000 people even back in Ireland before vaccines were invented. It's a gene. It has its beneficial aspect--the disease flips into "super" strength and resistance when we're able to avoid our "kryptonite." (So now glyphosate is making some of us really bizarre Spoonies. We can lift more than our own weight--on days when we can get out of bed!) Vaccines, to whatever extent we've had them, probably didn't help anything. Nevertheless. If we were last vaccinated in 1985 or 1963 or 1952, said no to unnecessary vax for things like flu and COVID, and we still have been subjected to chronic internal bleeding for years, have seen clots of internal tissue in the toilet bowl, have learned that people allowed to spray poison recklessly get to decide whether our waist measurements are going to be 24" or 36" today...Yes. That's why some of us don't think vaccines are the #1 priority.
It doesn't seem fair to compare a popular pesticide that has been added to the food supply for half a century to bioweapon injections based on experimental gene therapy technology that Moderna wasn't able to get passed animal testing due to lots of dead subjects. At this point it's obvious that the injection is intended to reduce the population so it needs to be deadly and that fact is clearly being covered up by the psychopathic globalists who are shooting for a population of 500,000,000 slaves. Maybe WW3 will be more effective in attaining their goal.
Sadly, your important work to expose the truth about the military countermeasure PREP act pathway isn't reaching enough people and this comparison could help with that. I hope it does and I will share it.
Back to glyphosate, that herbicide binds up minerals to cause deficiencies in trace minerals, the effects ought to include neurological issues and excessive eating due to people having a difficult time obtaining available micro-nutrients in high calorie low nutrition foods. Hence cancer is not really the problem. Certainly obesity and neurological problems have been increasing over the Roundup timeframe. However, as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong) cancer is the only condition that is considered for EPA regulation of herbicides so the more prevalent issues are ignored.
Maybe the rats were GMO roundup ready super rats provided by Monsanto/Bayer.
Tests before glyphosate was marketed showed that dogs are less vulnerable than rats, rats less than mice, mice less than rabbits. But what even tests on dogs show is that most animals DO have glyphosate reactions, but there's a lot of individual variation and an individual's first few reactions often don't seem significant even to the individual.
This two-part article critiques ONE study. Is everyone here aware that there've been thousands?!
Whilst I agree that 'vaccination' possess greater correlation to developments of cancer than glyphosate, the argument will escape notice in the courts. Cancer correlation to EMF exposure has failed courts and regulatory scrutiny for decades. Thus the physical carnage continues unabated. This will also be the case when civil lawsuits are filed against herbicide/pesticide manufacturers, because physical *cause and effect* have been completely dissociated in 'legal' jurisdictions. Whoever presents the most cash will be awarded as winner...
The debate needs to shift away from the intangibility of alleged "research" and toward the cause and effect of corruption and intangibility in business and Law. In my opinion, it is the corporate business model, period... Our decision making skills have been reduced to committee analyses of profit/loss statements. There are no spiritual, moral, nor ethical consideration in the business model. Maiming and murder are fine with committee members and investors who continue to launder dirty money in the filth and pollutants of commerce.
The COVID vax, like the swine flu vax in the 1970s, can be said to "cause cancer" if anything can, though bickering about the extent to which the different factors "cause cancer" is an endless distraction when it's easy to show that they have other harmful effects.
But even though chronic oxidative stress, which some people's glyphosate reactions unmistakably do involve, IS a known pro-cancer factor...cancer is not the only way humans die. Internal bleeding disorders, which correlate to glyphosate exposure the way Parkinson's Disease correlates to paraquat exposure, is the increasing cause of death that concerns people who know enough to say no to vaccines. And unfortunately, although we can become absolutely impossible to dine in restaurants with by avoiding contaminated vegetables, we can't avoid exposure to glyphosate in the air and water.
Hello Priscilla. Seems like you read my mind. It *IS* the cumulative effect of numerous metabolic and autoimmune stressors, for sure. The focus on direct cancer correlation is an intentional red herring. "Researchers" are duping themselves and the public by avoiding notice of metabolic disorders such type two diabetes, autoimmune dysfunction such as the alleged AIDS epidemic, and multiple neurological disorders caused by environmental and dietary factors. The "science" isn't flawed, the grant and funding process for competent research is flawed... That said:
The damaging effects of toxic load are moving to younger and younger persons, as the duration and amounts of contributing factors escalate. It's a wonder that human beings even manage to survive... Thank you for commenting.
(and this is one)...No. I'd like to think that we're united against a common enemy enough to support those who focus on different aspects of the common danger.
In the end everything kills and some do more harm than others. GLY as well as V’s, water and pure air kill…this has for a part to do with the induced substance, but we forget for a lifetime all our organs are doing their job to the best of their capabilities but…with all the toxins in and around us the pressure has never been so huge and some organs cannot cope the transit, there’s garbage that remains and also aging is a fact! Cancer is a fact and going synchronous with getting older nowadays, only some get older before their time. Our human brains too have never been so pressured in these modern times, it is failing and lagging behind in a speed everyone goes berserk. Memory, cognition, awareness, decision making and especially rejuvenating are going down the drain, we don’t register that something is happening so we accept and take cancers as a classic “unavoidable unsafe”. Solution(s) are you ready to pay the price and going (down) with it or…just say no. Getting old(er) is the unpardonable sin, it has become a crime and disease number one.
Well there is some good news if you are a rat of the rodent variety. It seems that all new mRNA poisons will be tested on human rats (right out of the box) just so they can be approved by the FDA much quicker ( if they even need approval).
Thank you moderna and fizer for being so cost conscientious. And for the MPRA campaign...make profits great again. I am sure MAHA is in your corner. Just wondering which of those CDC goons got the highest pay off? I bet it was CAPTAIN Sarah Meyer who simply loves your deadly mRNA poisons.
I thinking this: do rats withstand cancer better than humans do?
Are there anti-cancer factors in rats biology that are not found in humans? Not just vitamin c. I'm thinking in proteins that animals that naturally live in filthy conditions may have, that animals that evade filthy conditions may not have naturally.
Also, it's great to focus on vaccines against everything else, but it seems to me that there is an artificial consensus that vaccines are safe, almost by definition. So, people will tend to think that as a last possible item in the list of potential causes of all this carnage, that surprisingly is almost normalized now. It was a great move to call the mRNA vaccines. It's almost a miracle that some people are willing to think outside that box, given all the censorship and threats.
So a big thank you to all those who think outside the box.
No, actually rats are naturally prone to cancer. That's why they are used as a cancer model, especially with vaccines, it's guaranteed they get cancer.
The Guardian is beautiful. How on earth do you find the time to do the immense research you are known (gratefully so) for and paint? Keep it up, Sasha. Thank you.
Thank you! I do work all the time and never had a day of vacation without doing anything. However, art is not work, it's love for me, and so it doesn't count as working hours :)
Clearly, when it comes to toxicity to life as we know it, vaccines are far and away, the deadliest poisons known to have been forced upon our species.
People will never find solutions to problems that they never look for.
Ever think that the posion vax potions are even more potent with other toxins we ingest and topically apply? Why compound the dangers? Many or most of processed products at grocers and pharmacies are unnecessarily junked up with ingredients that are deemed OK in certain amounts but which could compromise our health in small but significant ways, depending on our individual vulnerabilities and the other products we use that could add up to adverse synergistic effects.
Glyphosate reactions most definitely do aggravate other reactions...including reactions to glyphosate-contaminated vaccines!
and 257 chemicals up to now have been found in the umbilical cord, among one GLY.
" George Washington ordered the inoculation of his troops against smallpox in 1777 when he was fighting the revolutionary war." Thus says Google so it must be true:).
George Washington was a freemason
Edward Jenner the father of vaccination was a freemason
Benjamin Franklin who founded the United States was a freemason
John Hancock who signed the Declaration of Independence was a freemason
Every US president up to and including DJT has been a freemason
Freemasons like vaccinations
Houston we have a problem.
I don't take much stock in studies that expose animals to doses many times higher than they would ever be exposed to normally because I know the dose makes the poison. There is no good or necessary thing that cannot be made harmful or even fatal if you get too much of it. Even water can be fatal if you drink too much and people have died this way.
Researchers administer mega doses of the studied substance because they want something to happen quickly so they can collect their grant money and move on to the next grant. But in so doing, they sabotage their own experiments and render the results meaningless.
Jay, I would be careful with "The dose makes the poison". I used to think that because everybody said it. It is used to convince us to take low dose poisons known as medicine. and to describe the ensuing bad symptoms as "side effects". There is a good discussion in "What Really Makes You Ill" about this - the Paracelsus fallacy. The fact that some poisons accumulate over a lifetime from incremental small doses renders this a doubtful concept. e.g. mercury, fluoride, aluminum. We know that "even water can kill us". But we need water - we don't need mercury, fluoride or aluminum. There is no safe "dose" of mercury. But check out that reference which explains it better than I can in a few words. Good luck
Dave meet my mother, 25 meds a day and she never forgot happy hour which could last the whole evening, she could not recall taking her meds, she repeated them, this is anecdotal she got 90 years old. What I learned from it well water can kill but in some beer can save lives. No I don’t take her as an example but the cups of mother bear are not that indestructible.
Possibly the side effects of 25 different meds cancelled each other out:).
25 beers you mean?
They probably wash the meds out of the system rapidly:).
They choose $’s as their god because God condemns their addiction.
Very informative, once again, we see the drastic difference of ingesting toxins ( Glyphosate) versus injecting (vaccines) in muscle that invariably gets into the blood stream-Charles Richet! Thank you, Sasha.
But, does it have to be an either/ or choice? What about "no" to injectables and "no" to ingestibles that are somewhat to very toxic, as long as we can access and afford relatively clean products... and to stock up on them?
When the food and herbal naturopath supply lines get interrupted in the near future, we won't have any choice, unless we garden organically and have laying hens and are very good and lucky at these healthy survival endeavors.
Exactly! We're close to getting a halt on the clot-shots (should've had one the year before last). We need a ban on glyphosate, too, because that is disabling--and killing--many people who've not even had a COVID vaccine.
In 1986 I went back to school & studied Horticulture. One of the things I learned very early on was Glyphosate ( Roundup)should only be applied on calm dry days. Not windy or rainy.
I learned to wear protective clothing and to not administer on windy days. In 1986 “they” already were saying to use with caution since GLYPHOSATE could cause cancer.
Ohhh. Bioburden over lifetime and synergistic effects. It's the next step. Gyphosate and excitotoxins and vaccines should be interesting. The true American compromised life? Maybe add in mandatory sedentary lifestyle too!
Can't parse the sarc, but why are we accepting a so-called modern lifestyle of better living through basically unaccountable lab chemistry by corporations protected by Government that is incorporated into our food chain or injected into us directly, as if we were dumb livestock or weeds?
Oh, wait...
Aluminum is far more problematic and it's linked with glysophate. Aluminum is also in many pre "mRNA" shots.
Only idiotic scientists think it's a good idea to inject aluminum into bodies.
https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/glyphosate-addendum
Good comment, but "idiotic" is too generous a description.
I'm in agreement with you Sasha. I was told a couple of days ago, by my doctor, that surgery I was recently referred for, (iatrogenic hearing loss) a recommended cochlear implant, would necessitate a full course of "vaccinations". I told her that I would accept death before "vaccination" of any kind. I maintain that covert or forced vaccinations upon my person would excite an extremely violent response to the perp that attempts such a vile act. Poisoning the food supply covertly with vaccines, as has been suggested, as a method of 'vaccinating the entire population without knowledge or consent', would be the ultimate trigger for retribution with prejudice. It is ZERO TOLERANCE and no mercy for vaccinators from my perspective. I know of a case recently where a woman was "vaccinated" while under sedation for surgery, in hospital. When she obtained the records, and discovered that she had been "vaccinated" while unconscious, against her will...she sued the hospital. Outcome is pending. I doubt I would exercise such restraint.
Can you share that case of vaccination while under sedation? Is there a link? I have been very curious about this for a few years.
Hi Judith. The case involves Thunder Bay Regional Hospital, and the woman was in surgery, under sedation, when she was injected with Covid vaccine, without her consent. There is no link to share that I am aware of. I understand this case is still ongoing. I have not yet heard of any resolution of the matter.
the proper mouse gyphosate study should have a group who've been jabbed with, say, pfizer or moderna or sputnik or whatever, versus unjabbed mice. right?
seems reasonable to conclude that glyphosate or any other toxin for that matter would be more toxic to humans in general, for that reason
the power of that angel leaves me at a loss for words. may we all be that fearless
Correct! I would love to see such a study. However, we already know that to make a rat or mouse line that reliably generate cancer (for studies of cancer drugs) "the $cience(TM" method is to vaccinate them. LOL. magic.
mRNA vax should become the new go to “placebo “ for fraud studies to prove how safe whatever being “studied “ is.
HA!
good point. rats don't magically generate cancerous cells just because a mad scientist needs them to test his magic brew
I think enough mice have suffered and died to show the same thing: most mice show some sort of glyphosate reaction but there may never be a hundred mice in which ten show the same reaction, so statistical studies of animals lack something, in regard to glyphosate. It's possible for some people not to see the obvious conclusion that glyphosate reactions vary among individuals.
I want to see studies that focus on more clearly understood questions, like: Are there patients who have chronic bleeding conditions that are *not* dramatically affected by glyphosate? Most of us are dramatically affected. And people who want to remain in denial about this should have to handle the samples, and see for themselves the lack of visible blood when patients have not been exposed to glyphosate and the tablespoonfuls of blood when we have. The blood is not what costs money to measure; the glyphosate is.
Thank you for this. The painting is stunning. Yes, the jabs are the culprit. We can literally see it all around: before jabs: healthy, after jabs: sick. Can a compromised gut microbiome make a person more susceptible to vaccine injury though? Glyphosate is, among other things, patented as an antibiotic.
My children had surgery and were given antibiotics immediately after birth. They are also vaccine injured. We 'manage' vaccine injury through a healthy, natural diet (with lots of kefir, sauerkraut, kombucha etc.) realizing the injury will not be cured by food.
vaccines are the primary method to compromise gut biome permanently. If someone has a gut biome issue due to an occasional exposure to glyphosate or some other toxic chemical substance via digestion - that "washes out" after the exposure is stopped. And gut biome recovers. When vaccines create anaphylaxis (as the all do by injecting foreign proteins into the blood stream) - this creates permanent damage to the gut and it's biome. Which is may be possible to "manage" and restore somewhat over a long period of time, but it is a much much more significant damage vs. via digestion.
Sasha, Christopher Exley aka ' Mr Aluminium', on his Substack is questioning why the Aluminium content in Glyphosate has not been highlighted as the main, or only, carcinogenic ingredient.
Could it be because the Aluminium industry as a whole, is huge ?
The most used in consumer products, as a subtle depopulation poison, ahead of Fluoride and Mercury.
Well said.
https://open.substack.com/pub/drchristopherexley/p/glyphosate-addendum?r=10qqi2&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Think of a child with a skinned knee. Of course the knee recovers. Now imagine someone deliberately skinning the child's knee--maybe alternate knees on alternate days, maybe different sides of the knee--but skinning the knee every day. It will continue to TRY to recover. It will not be a normal, functional knee.
We know that celiacs' ancestors had a more vulnerable biome than 9,999 out of 10,000 people even back in Ireland before vaccines were invented. It's a gene. It has its beneficial aspect--the disease flips into "super" strength and resistance when we're able to avoid our "kryptonite." (So now glyphosate is making some of us really bizarre Spoonies. We can lift more than our own weight--on days when we can get out of bed!) Vaccines, to whatever extent we've had them, probably didn't help anything. Nevertheless. If we were last vaccinated in 1985 or 1963 or 1952, said no to unnecessary vax for things like flu and COVID, and we still have been subjected to chronic internal bleeding for years, have seen clots of internal tissue in the toilet bowl, have learned that people allowed to spray poison recklessly get to decide whether our waist measurements are going to be 24" or 36" today...Yes. That's why some of us don't think vaccines are the #1 priority.
It doesn't seem fair to compare a popular pesticide that has been added to the food supply for half a century to bioweapon injections based on experimental gene therapy technology that Moderna wasn't able to get passed animal testing due to lots of dead subjects. At this point it's obvious that the injection is intended to reduce the population so it needs to be deadly and that fact is clearly being covered up by the psychopathic globalists who are shooting for a population of 500,000,000 slaves. Maybe WW3 will be more effective in attaining their goal.
Sadly, your important work to expose the truth about the military countermeasure PREP act pathway isn't reaching enough people and this comparison could help with that. I hope it does and I will share it.
Back to glyphosate, that herbicide binds up minerals to cause deficiencies in trace minerals, the effects ought to include neurological issues and excessive eating due to people having a difficult time obtaining available micro-nutrients in high calorie low nutrition foods. Hence cancer is not really the problem. Certainly obesity and neurological problems have been increasing over the Roundup timeframe. However, as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong) cancer is the only condition that is considered for EPA regulation of herbicides so the more prevalent issues are ignored.
Maybe the rats were GMO roundup ready super rats provided by Monsanto/Bayer.
Tests before glyphosate was marketed showed that dogs are less vulnerable than rats, rats less than mice, mice less than rabbits. But what even tests on dogs show is that most animals DO have glyphosate reactions, but there's a lot of individual variation and an individual's first few reactions often don't seem significant even to the individual.
This two-part article critiques ONE study. Is everyone here aware that there've been thousands?!
I have links at least to abstracts for a few hundred, at my blog.
Whilst I agree that 'vaccination' possess greater correlation to developments of cancer than glyphosate, the argument will escape notice in the courts. Cancer correlation to EMF exposure has failed courts and regulatory scrutiny for decades. Thus the physical carnage continues unabated. This will also be the case when civil lawsuits are filed against herbicide/pesticide manufacturers, because physical *cause and effect* have been completely dissociated in 'legal' jurisdictions. Whoever presents the most cash will be awarded as winner...
The debate needs to shift away from the intangibility of alleged "research" and toward the cause and effect of corruption and intangibility in business and Law. In my opinion, it is the corporate business model, period... Our decision making skills have been reduced to committee analyses of profit/loss statements. There are no spiritual, moral, nor ethical consideration in the business model. Maiming and murder are fine with committee members and investors who continue to launder dirty money in the filth and pollutants of commerce.
The COVID vax, like the swine flu vax in the 1970s, can be said to "cause cancer" if anything can, though bickering about the extent to which the different factors "cause cancer" is an endless distraction when it's easy to show that they have other harmful effects.
But even though chronic oxidative stress, which some people's glyphosate reactions unmistakably do involve, IS a known pro-cancer factor...cancer is not the only way humans die. Internal bleeding disorders, which correlate to glyphosate exposure the way Parkinson's Disease correlates to paraquat exposure, is the increasing cause of death that concerns people who know enough to say no to vaccines. And unfortunately, although we can become absolutely impossible to dine in restaurants with by avoiding contaminated vegetables, we can't avoid exposure to glyphosate in the air and water.
Hello Priscilla. Seems like you read my mind. It *IS* the cumulative effect of numerous metabolic and autoimmune stressors, for sure. The focus on direct cancer correlation is an intentional red herring. "Researchers" are duping themselves and the public by avoiding notice of metabolic disorders such type two diabetes, autoimmune dysfunction such as the alleged AIDS epidemic, and multiple neurological disorders caused by environmental and dietary factors. The "science" isn't flawed, the grant and funding process for competent research is flawed... That said:
The damaging effects of toxic load are moving to younger and younger persons, as the duration and amounts of contributing factors escalate. It's a wonder that human beings even manage to survive... Thank you for commenting.
Thank you Sasha. Distractions have always been a big part of war.
(and this is one)...No. I'd like to think that we're united against a common enemy enough to support those who focus on different aspects of the common danger.
In the end everything kills and some do more harm than others. GLY as well as V’s, water and pure air kill…this has for a part to do with the induced substance, but we forget for a lifetime all our organs are doing their job to the best of their capabilities but…with all the toxins in and around us the pressure has never been so huge and some organs cannot cope the transit, there’s garbage that remains and also aging is a fact! Cancer is a fact and going synchronous with getting older nowadays, only some get older before their time. Our human brains too have never been so pressured in these modern times, it is failing and lagging behind in a speed everyone goes berserk. Memory, cognition, awareness, decision making and especially rejuvenating are going down the drain, we don’t register that something is happening so we accept and take cancers as a classic “unavoidable unsafe”. Solution(s) are you ready to pay the price and going (down) with it or…just say no. Getting old(er) is the unpardonable sin, it has become a crime and disease number one.
Well there is some good news if you are a rat of the rodent variety. It seems that all new mRNA poisons will be tested on human rats (right out of the box) just so they can be approved by the FDA much quicker ( if they even need approval).
Thank you moderna and fizer for being so cost conscientious. And for the MPRA campaign...make profits great again. I am sure MAHA is in your corner. Just wondering which of those CDC goons got the highest pay off? I bet it was CAPTAIN Sarah Meyer who simply loves your deadly mRNA poisons.
Great post.
I thinking this: do rats withstand cancer better than humans do?
Are there anti-cancer factors in rats biology that are not found in humans? Not just vitamin c. I'm thinking in proteins that animals that naturally live in filthy conditions may have, that animals that evade filthy conditions may not have naturally.
Also, it's great to focus on vaccines against everything else, but it seems to me that there is an artificial consensus that vaccines are safe, almost by definition. So, people will tend to think that as a last possible item in the list of potential causes of all this carnage, that surprisingly is almost normalized now. It was a great move to call the mRNA vaccines. It's almost a miracle that some people are willing to think outside that box, given all the censorship and threats.
So a big thank you to all those who think outside the box.
No, actually rats are naturally prone to cancer. That's why they are used as a cancer model, especially with vaccines, it's guaranteed they get cancer.
Ah. Okay then. Thank you.
The Guardian is beautiful. How on earth do you find the time to do the immense research you are known (gratefully so) for and paint? Keep it up, Sasha. Thank you.
Thank you! I do work all the time and never had a day of vacation without doing anything. However, art is not work, it's love for me, and so it doesn't count as working hours :)
Again, thank you for writing