"Pfizer with the FDA’s complicity want the public and medical professionals to believe that the delivery vehicle (LNP) is the “product”, while the payload that gets delivered is irrelevant and can be substituted with any surrogates."
looks like you found the key to the bioweapon program. the DOD can substitute any payload it wants - which seems to be happening, based on the "how bad is my batch" results - and get away with it.
also glad you focused on how the pfizer "studies" set a precedent for voodoo science in future genetic engineering "trials."
i love how there is always a beautiful payoff at the end of your articles. i can feel the snow under those trees. dreaming of curating a sasha latypova retrospective when this is all over!
Thank you, Sasha. The clear and simple language you use to explain complex steps in the trials stages with the definitions all clarified makes reading easy and comprehension good for everyone especially laypeople like myself.
Ok, Sasha your discovery that some mRNA had coding for luciferase production and not for spike proteins got my attention!
This is neurotech on steroids. This is exactly what neuroweapon experts have been warning is about. The genes light up, and though you can’t “see” through the skull (duh), the energy doesn’t disappear. It is transformed into heat and ultrasound that can be detected from a distance. Add nanoparticles and nanocurcuits, and you have intracelllular antennas for detecting optogenetically transformed genes, and since the connection is bi-directional, It also allows for intervention.
This has been shown even without nanotech present, but of course, nano antennas and transducers make the task much more accurate and reliable.
While we are debating whether mRNA jabs prevent Covid, their true purpose remains hidden. The fact that they have been called “vaccines” and were released in conjunction with a manufactured pandemic, serve as misdirection and prevents us from studying and learning what they were actually designed for.
When you look at it like this, it has CIA style deceit, misinformation, and misdirection written all over. It’s the same style of activity that the agency has been involved in since its inception.
It is obvious they took something off the shelf and lied about every aspect in order to collect billions of dollars. And the money was their only interest. Then they bribe governments to sign contracts that guarantee that money no matter what happens.
From what John Campbell said on his tube channel, the UK government has done a deal with moderna for 10 years and 250 million doses🥳🍻🇬🇧 I believe Canada and Austarlia were also mentioned. It would appear were along way off being done with this💉💉💉💉💉💉💉interesting to note he said the shots should be pulled on twatter but didn't mention it on utube😳 censorship issues I suspect🍻
Sasha - your painting is stunning. I would like to buy one as it will be from an artist who will go down in history as a brave young woman who risked so very much in that we all would know the truth.
PS - I shared your video with Lara Logan with Jeff Childers, (very popular) Substack author of Coffee and Covid. He said “fascinating” and thanked me in a reply to my comment. I’m glad I didn’t assume he was familiar with your facts and evidence.
“… the future “out” of safety testing claiming their products are derivatives of “approved safe products” while erecting a regulatory barrier to other manufacturers who would wish to design a different Covid-19 vaccine.”
This points to the drive to use the Covid jabs as the basis for the entire mRNA delivery platform.
The theater of the entire ‘process’ reads like a fraudulent tax return. All of the boxes and fields filled in, but rooted in lies and deception. And the auditor—the FDA, like the IRS—is in on the lie, ostensibly conducting a review, but merely confirming a checklist, without any scrutiny of the basis for claims. And just like the tax code, too few have actually read it, or understand the important details of what it requires or the loopholes contained.
Thank you, once again, for shining the light on this. The criminality is even more obvious with every article you share.
Describing all this as incompetence is clearly not strong enough. The only way this paper trail analysis and the whole scamdemic makes any sense is for us to see .it as purposely intended to cause harm. In my mind I wonder if the likes of Mr and Mrs Fauci, Collins, Birx, Walensky, Bourla Peter Dzazak, are "possessed" to be capable of such atrocity.
From the work you have done re DoD involvement, being in total control of all "brands," I have read mostly about Pfizer, little less about Moderna, nothing about J&J or AZ which I know wasn't allowed in USA. I am referring to FOIA requests for trial data, CRFs (which are like hens' teeth) for these other brand trials. Have they been requested by anyone? The fact of 3 of the 5 eyes countries setting up r&d and manufacturing plants to produce hundreds of millions of new "vaccines" to be put into arms within 100 days from concept is terrifying.
thank you Sasha for your clear explanation, warnings. although awareness seems to be increasing it is hard to be optimistic about 2023 given the May 2023 World Health Assembly scheduling for potential adoption of the WHO International Pandemic Treaty anointing the corrupt WHO as supreme world leader with power to supersede, at whim, all countries laws, citizens rights & freedoms.
I'm new to this circle of research, reflection, discussion and debate. I'm very glad to be among those advancing this new frontier of understanding of the COVID debacle, with Sasha Latypova in the lead. Like other commentators here, I am struck by how much the analysis above seemed to prove and illustrate the thesis the the DOD has been in charge all along and that the federal regulators and drug companies are engaged in an especially insidious saga of play acting. Are you writing this essay, Sasha, for an audience that you believe might become be alienated if you were to them a bridge too far into the realm of murder by deception?
The short and certain answer is 'no'. Nor did they ever intend to, nor have they ever, nor do they plan to in the future.
I've found one of the most effective ways to discuss this particular aspect of the Pfizer Pfraud is to open the discussion/debate with a short chronology of Pfizer's past track record to provide context- they have been convicted of over 70 felony offenses. This can't be contested by anyone trying to defend Pfizer as Pfizer has admitted to these criminal offenses and paid the fines.
One could list the specifics of just a few of these offenses, cooked trial data and bribed medical/health officials in the past e.g., before getting into the specifics of their most recent fraudulent "clinical trials" for the mRNA injections.
One could add to this opening salvo a quick explanation of how ALL vaccine studies are manipulated- they go through this in detail in "Turtles All The Way Down."
Such an opening serves to undermine the acrobatics that so-called "experts" perform as they try to defend these insanely dangerous injections and explain away the shortcomings of Pfizer's protocols.
In the logical construct of a debate such a tactic illustrates the mechanisms that they have used historically and repeatedly to determine the "safety and efficacy" of previous Pfizer drugs, which the courts deemed were fraudulent, resulting in drugs that the company itself was forced to admit were harmful.
Hi Sasha, didn't you say that because these SHOTS were ordered by the DoD and are part of a defense system, as bioweapons, no pharmacological testing was required, and that the producers were just "following orders"? If this is correct, why did they have to apply for approval on the "medical" bases that you describe above? Why was the FDA involved if the DoD belongs to an entirely different ddepartment?
"Pfizer with the FDA’s complicity want the public and medical professionals to believe that the delivery vehicle (LNP) is the “product”, while the payload that gets delivered is irrelevant and can be substituted with any surrogates."
looks like you found the key to the bioweapon program. the DOD can substitute any payload it wants - which seems to be happening, based on the "how bad is my batch" results - and get away with it.
also glad you focused on how the pfizer "studies" set a precedent for voodoo science in future genetic engineering "trials."
plus as sage has documented, the second the eua was announced, fullscale manufacturing began. the trials were a sham https://sagehana.substack.com/p/jared-kushner-the-lancet-had-a-study
i love how there is always a beautiful payoff at the end of your articles. i can feel the snow under those trees. dreaming of curating a sasha latypova retrospective when this is all over!
Thank you, Sasha. The clear and simple language you use to explain complex steps in the trials stages with the definitions all clarified makes reading easy and comprehension good for everyone especially laypeople like myself.
Ok, Sasha your discovery that some mRNA had coding for luciferase production and not for spike proteins got my attention!
This is neurotech on steroids. This is exactly what neuroweapon experts have been warning is about. The genes light up, and though you can’t “see” through the skull (duh), the energy doesn’t disappear. It is transformed into heat and ultrasound that can be detected from a distance. Add nanoparticles and nanocurcuits, and you have intracelllular antennas for detecting optogenetically transformed genes, and since the connection is bi-directional, It also allows for intervention.
This has been shown even without nanotech present, but of course, nano antennas and transducers make the task much more accurate and reliable.
While we are debating whether mRNA jabs prevent Covid, their true purpose remains hidden. The fact that they have been called “vaccines” and were released in conjunction with a manufactured pandemic, serve as misdirection and prevents us from studying and learning what they were actually designed for.
When you look at it like this, it has CIA style deceit, misinformation, and misdirection written all over. It’s the same style of activity that the agency has been involved in since its inception.
What a concise summary , thanks so much . When you paint , is there a calming effect ? Very beautiful! Happy New Year.
It is obvious they took something off the shelf and lied about every aspect in order to collect billions of dollars. And the money was their only interest. Then they bribe governments to sign contracts that guarantee that money no matter what happens.
From what John Campbell said on his tube channel, the UK government has done a deal with moderna for 10 years and 250 million doses🥳🍻🇬🇧 I believe Canada and Austarlia were also mentioned. It would appear were along way off being done with this💉💉💉💉💉💉💉interesting to note he said the shots should be pulled on twatter but didn't mention it on utube😳 censorship issues I suspect🍻
Sasha - your painting is stunning. I would like to buy one as it will be from an artist who will go down in history as a brave young woman who risked so very much in that we all would know the truth.
PS - I shared your video with Lara Logan with Jeff Childers, (very popular) Substack author of Coffee and Covid. He said “fascinating” and thanked me in a reply to my comment. I’m glad I didn’t assume he was familiar with your facts and evidence.
“… the future “out” of safety testing claiming their products are derivatives of “approved safe products” while erecting a regulatory barrier to other manufacturers who would wish to design a different Covid-19 vaccine.”
This points to the drive to use the Covid jabs as the basis for the entire mRNA delivery platform.
The theater of the entire ‘process’ reads like a fraudulent tax return. All of the boxes and fields filled in, but rooted in lies and deception. And the auditor—the FDA, like the IRS—is in on the lie, ostensibly conducting a review, but merely confirming a checklist, without any scrutiny of the basis for claims. And just like the tax code, too few have actually read it, or understand the important details of what it requires or the loopholes contained.
Thank you, once again, for shining the light on this. The criminality is even more obvious with every article you share.
Describing all this as incompetence is clearly not strong enough. The only way this paper trail analysis and the whole scamdemic makes any sense is for us to see .it as purposely intended to cause harm. In my mind I wonder if the likes of Mr and Mrs Fauci, Collins, Birx, Walensky, Bourla Peter Dzazak, are "possessed" to be capable of such atrocity.
From the work you have done re DoD involvement, being in total control of all "brands," I have read mostly about Pfizer, little less about Moderna, nothing about J&J or AZ which I know wasn't allowed in USA. I am referring to FOIA requests for trial data, CRFs (which are like hens' teeth) for these other brand trials. Have they been requested by anyone? The fact of 3 of the 5 eyes countries setting up r&d and manufacturing plants to produce hundreds of millions of new "vaccines" to be put into arms within 100 days from concept is terrifying.
thank you Sasha for your clear explanation, warnings. although awareness seems to be increasing it is hard to be optimistic about 2023 given the May 2023 World Health Assembly scheduling for potential adoption of the WHO International Pandemic Treaty anointing the corrupt WHO as supreme world leader with power to supersede, at whim, all countries laws, citizens rights & freedoms.
https://americanpolicy.org/2022/04/26/the-international-treaty-that-will-end-the-great-american-dream-if-we-allow-it/
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/
Do you expect honesty in a war?
Of course they didn't test out their poison!!
They knew it was deadly.
What need to prove to the enemy (mankind) that their weapon is deadly?
I'm new to this circle of research, reflection, discussion and debate. I'm very glad to be among those advancing this new frontier of understanding of the COVID debacle, with Sasha Latypova in the lead. Like other commentators here, I am struck by how much the analysis above seemed to prove and illustrate the thesis the the DOD has been in charge all along and that the federal regulators and drug companies are engaged in an especially insidious saga of play acting. Are you writing this essay, Sasha, for an audience that you believe might become be alienated if you were to them a bridge too far into the realm of murder by deception?
Anthony J. Hall
Professor Emeritus
University of Lethbridge
Alberta Canada
PFIZER KILLED ME WITHOUT KILLING ME. Hell no! #NoAmnesty
The short and certain answer is 'no'. Nor did they ever intend to, nor have they ever, nor do they plan to in the future.
I've found one of the most effective ways to discuss this particular aspect of the Pfizer Pfraud is to open the discussion/debate with a short chronology of Pfizer's past track record to provide context- they have been convicted of over 70 felony offenses. This can't be contested by anyone trying to defend Pfizer as Pfizer has admitted to these criminal offenses and paid the fines.
One could list the specifics of just a few of these offenses, cooked trial data and bribed medical/health officials in the past e.g., before getting into the specifics of their most recent fraudulent "clinical trials" for the mRNA injections.
One could add to this opening salvo a quick explanation of how ALL vaccine studies are manipulated- they go through this in detail in "Turtles All The Way Down."
Such an opening serves to undermine the acrobatics that so-called "experts" perform as they try to defend these insanely dangerous injections and explain away the shortcomings of Pfizer's protocols.
In the logical construct of a debate such a tactic illustrates the mechanisms that they have used historically and repeatedly to determine the "safety and efficacy" of previous Pfizer drugs, which the courts deemed were fraudulent, resulting in drugs that the company itself was forced to admit were harmful.
Hi Sasha, didn't you say that because these SHOTS were ordered by the DoD and are part of a defense system, as bioweapons, no pharmacological testing was required, and that the producers were just "following orders"? If this is correct, why did they have to apply for approval on the "medical" bases that you describe above? Why was the FDA involved if the DoD belongs to an entirely different ddepartment?