100 Comments
User's avatar
Kaylene Emery's avatar

Blessings to you n yours Sasha!

Lynton Grayson's avatar

I remember when Scomo said they have acquired 250m does and I thought to myself back then that’s 10 doses each but they said it was only A vaccine not multiple doses. I am refusing to pay any taxes because of this genocide committed against my country.

DrBines verbales Vitriol's avatar

It's not only that they didn't use animals that could not geht COVID, it is worse.

According to the German PEI, the should have used huACE2 mice:

"Since wild-type (wt) mice are not permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, huACE2-transgenic mice are used for COVID-19 vaccine-related studies in the mouse model, which express the human ACE2 receptor on cells and are therefore readily infected with SARS-CoV-2 and develop a clear disease phenotype." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34358163/

BUT

Not one of the Vaxx producers used huACE2 mice. Without humane ACE2 receptor, it is impossible to see damage:

https://drbine-substack-com.translate.goog/p/warum-huace2-mause-so-wichtig-gewesen?_x_tr_sl=hu&_x_tr_tl=de&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp&_x_tr_hist=true

I aked the PEI about the discrepance of their paper to the real data. No answer till today.

mariko uda's avatar

Hi Sasha, Thank you for your work! You mention that the rat toxicity studies used the LNP instead of the mRNA-LNP, but I wanted to let you know that I found a Pfizer document that details the rat repeat dose toxicology & the reproductive toxicology studies and it seems that they used the mRNA-LNP (& it seems like there were adverse effects, but they are downplayed). I found it here: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/comirnaty Click on "Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents - COMIRNATY" Then open the "Toxicology" file. I could be wrong - I am not experienced in (non)clinical review - but it seems to me that they used the mRNA-LNP.

ML's avatar

This is an amazing read, thank you so much.

Jonathan Engler's avatar

This is an amazing piece of work, comprehensive and comprehensible, thank you.

Monica's avatar

I was just about to respond here but my memory of what I was going to post was completely wiped. I'm 46 years old and very healthy. Just documenting because I think this happens a lot.

Art's avatar

The research regarding various microRNAs involved with Cardio Vascular Disease and various Cancers and Immune Responses and Fibrosis has been published in microRNA databases. Perhaps the types of microRNAs could be figured out or reverse engineered by the various diseases we are seeing today as anecdotal evidence. The variety of damages incurred tells us it wasn't just one thing, such as a S1 spike protein producing mRNA. This paper talks about what is in the microRNA database a bit. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688578/

bio terry's avatar

Thank you Sasha for a thoroughly well researched article, as always. I see Pfizer is starting with another untested malaria drug in Malawi... one really wonders how they are still getting away with all their crimes.. is the malaria drugs perhaps there to get back at Africa not being willingly and thoroughly voodoo'd by their mrna covid vaxxine effort. Perhaps because poverty in Africa means millions of African people don't participate in poisonous social media, thus not being able to get indoctrinated by pfizer scare tactics in cooperation with the everwilling sly ms media. Now pfizer is trying different techniques to affect African people's health by giving them untested, new malaria mrna??? drugs...?

John Day MD's avatar

Everybody who watches American football "knows" now.

"Common knowledge" is when everybody-knows-that-everybody-knows.

The government and media are harshly denying reality, harshly...

That also becomes known to all...

sus3's avatar

What we are witnessing is not merely corporate capture of government agencies (NIH, FDA, etc.) nor government agencies capture of corporations (i.e., Google, Twitter, etc.). What has actually occurred is the MERGER of corporations and governments.

GiGi's avatar

INDs require informed consent and cannot be mandated (except to military only but only with a presidential waiver that has not been done). If the jab is argued to not be an IND but rather a prototype/demonstration, then those paramount IND protections technically do not apply.

Ron1234's avatar

In all the inserts from vaccine vials I have read (perhaps applicable to most or all vaccines), carcinogenicity testing, mutagenicity testing, and some related to reproduction are excluded. Where did this tradition come from? Why is it allowed to continue? This is an issue that goes well beyond these COVID products.

Ernie Rockwell's avatar

One of your best articles, among many highly qualified candidates. Reveals the dog and pony show.

Elana Freeland had an interesting interview where she said that the US and Sweden 🇸🇪 developed a reciprocal arrangement that each government would target certain citizens of the other, by request, to avoid laws in their own country that would prohibit this. Seems similar to the management of covid “therapeutics” by the DOD in order to, pseudo legally, avoid any responsibility to perform any of the studies that would have to be performed if the FDA was really in charge (as you meticulously laid out).

Love the art. Thanks Sasha (or is it Alexandra?) and Happy New Year.

Andy Bunting's avatar

Thank you Sasha.

The now infamous, "Speed of Science". Directly fueled by the speed of "How quickly the millions arrived into whose accounts."