"My position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths associated with them, and due to no evidence that vaccines prevent anything. At a minimum, the right to refuse injections of anything, regardless whether it is good or bad for you should be universally upheld and protected. Every parent should be educated to stop poisoning their children. The government officials should be prosecuted for lying to the public."
Any Presidential candidate should be saying exactly this, harping on these points like a rabid dog. These issues are far more important than the risk of nuclear warfare. The preservation of the health of children is beyond existential in importance. The people who fail to see this are less aware of immediate reality than a drunkard. I'm just sayin'!
Why vote for any candidate that does not stop the covid vaccine? If you vote for either candidate you get more of the same- murder of the US population, children included. Does no one think or see the reality of this situation - voting endorses a leader who allows us to be murdered by the DoD and HHS. Nothing changes.
I think what you are saying is true. At the same time we have to keep in mind the reality that during and after World War II when you ask the populations of the Eastern European countries, what was worse, rule under Hitler or rule under Stalin and their response is the worst situation was when no one was in charge. The reason for that response is that there is a criminal element in every society which takes over when no one is in charge. At the time a crime is being committed if there is not a good person with a gun, then the bad person with a gun wins. A crime is often committed in minutes. By the time the police arrive, if you are lucky minutes later, they are there to take notes.
That's kinda the point. We are expected to make a choice that is little different than choosing between Hilter and Stalin. And were Hilter and Stalin the choices today, people would be at each others' throats over which is better. Tyranny is tyranny, the specific flavor matters not. Decades upon decades of choosing lesser of two evils got us here. Continuing that insanity is not going to make it better. And continuing to support the very system that wants us dead by participating in their sham (s)election rituals will only continue our misery. You can't vote criminals out of a system that is run solely by criminals. Changing the head of an organized crime family does nothing but allow the organized crime family to carry on.
I'm voting for RFK, Jr. and I hope many others do also. Then we can at least send a clear signal that enough of us reject the 2 choices. The criminals will be too busy rigging the election between the 2 hopefully they will let the RFK, Jr. ballots stand
So according to your dichotomous logic, if one condemns trump for his warp speed toxin and his continued efforts to promote it after the 2020 election that must make one a biden supporter. Show me a dictator or a communist country who finances and arms the genocidal entity called israel... or STFU!
Exactly my conclusion. Having been raised and properly brainwashed in a socialist country (Chinada) it was a long road but an important journey to realize the essential and inevitable corruption of any government.
Judging from my personal experience, people use their eyes, ears and brain very selectively, filtering out any information, causing pain, distress or discomfort.
Also, as Sasha correctly pointed out recently, most people have an attention span of a goldfish. Thus, anybody willing to fool people, needs to tell them whatever they want to hear. Telling the Truth is a very honorable thing to do, but one should be prepared to be stoned to death by the very same people you are trying to save. The deep state knows it better than anybody else.
“I don't think that we ought to be mandating medical interventions for UNWILLING Americans UNLESS we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping people rather than hurting them.”
Of course it won't matter because people like Heroes and will gleefully march off the cliff for this placebo and will jump through hooops to justify and explain.
I've watched Mr Kennedy's presentation, and he makes a number of valid statements. However; I completely disagree with the entire notion of "testing" poisons on living subjects, whether human or animal.
Man has been THE butcher of life for thousands of years. When life is butchered for profit rather than sustenance, it is a violation of the essential essence. A mortal sin...
Re-do vaxx clinical trials (start fresh to ignore all those pesky existing side effects data) by the same people who have lied for a century (because we Trust The Science and Big Pharma to ethically conduct research with transparency. ) Then the new and better research will show vaccines are safe and effective, BUT!! they can Build Back Better (if you prefer that slogan) with the shiney new mRNA technology. so Warp Speed Ahead (if you prefer that slogan) to get all vaccines transitioned to mRNA. Safe and Effective. Stamped with the seal: Proven By Science. Now NO ONE can refuse.
“Right to refuse that is robust” from RFKjr. Really. I already have that right it’s called informed consent.
I do not need a “leader” to confer rights the constitution did that. The government is perepetrating mass murder on the populous and you think RFKjr will change that - you are wrong - the plan is more of the same - RFKjr never mentions repealing the constitutional
Laws that enable mass murder by the DoD and HHS - why is that? Ask yourself that.
Sonny and Karla may be right. But I have an election coming, and I'm going to gather some people together who at least know which rights we would like to regain. RFK, Jr. has had Sasha on his podcast, and knows what laws need to be removed to restore the freedoms that our constitution has supposedly guaranteed. He has told me in person of his plans to get this done. I'm working with others who feel as we all do that our rights have been trampled. If we elect him and if he wins and he proves you right, so be it. I will still have gathered people about me to continue the battle.
The constitution did not, does not “confer” rights to us. It merely names/acknowledges our preexisting, natural, self-evident, God-given rights. The rights we have as our birthright.
The world is a stage, and politics is Hollywood for ugly people.
Choosing the facilitators of your type of slavery seems to.be the acceptable outcome for most truthers these days. People are just too enamoured by the pantomime and have no idea of the false dichotomy of left and right, let alone the hegalian dialectic
We are threatened by annihilation on every front- nuclear war should also be an issue in any debate- nuclear war is an option worse than covid vaccine but they are both means of destroying the world as we have known it. Where is the protest as we face elections mination every day has everyone just tuned out.
Think long term: if nuclear war does not happen, but the children of today are poisoned and become ill for the rest of their lives, then there won't be armies in the future.
Why should we need armies? AI will fulfill that role. Military is already poisoning the troops via covid vaccine which has an impact on fertility of female troops. Long term thinking - why would any woman or man - mother and father want to have a child that grows up to be fodder for the fatherland or is that the one world government we are threatened with. Armies will be a thing of the past if we can survive too have a past.
Similarly, In 1969, we were taught by a native Chinese Mandarin speaker at the Defense Language Institute West Coast Branch, that "wǒ ài nǐ" is a phrase for “I love you”. The middle word in the phrase is "love". (-:
There won’t be armies in the future…..my dear think, think again yet think again, they will make us soldiers full metal jacket, fully vaccinated if not by a needle, then by screens, sound, magnetic waves, neuro linguistics, psychotropics….political Olympics and oh yes it’s all in the mind, the perfect psychodrama we have ourselves killed by AI the ultimate delusion.
Whole my life and I suspect the mind, yes I’m included…the mind, individual, collective, unconscious, neuro linguistic, super conscious the spiritual and religious mind as a whole to be the result of propaganda, nothing more the same stuff dreams are made of
Voting is just as big a scam as virology. If it would make a difference, it would be illegal. This is why from a very young age you're taught to "vote harder, goy!".
Is she? That's funny, I don't remember ever making that mental association. I never thought much of that woman, and she just looked too dumb even for a politician. Alcoholism might explain it.
I mean, if she's an alcoholic she obviously needs support and the last thing she needs now is to lose her job. Everyone should vote for her so that she feels safe and accepted and she can face her inner demons.
No one should ever criticize her again, lest her condition worsens.
It's so selfish that people want a POTUS that is sane and healthy and reliable and smart. But now is not the time for selfishness. It's time to be selfless and put another drug addict in the White House. Yeah, selflessness and solidarity will stop the wars in the world.
Perhaps mothers and sperm donors of the last five decades should have considered the "immediate reality" of creating an eighty year life span, rather than the immediate gratification of alleged reality... Not a comment most would agree with, but there it is...
“Now let me state very clearly that the mission of the Informed Consent Action Network my mission, The Highwire, Aaron's mission, in all the work that we do is to end mandates forever. I don't believe that any medical intervention should ever be mandated upon you. And we are working to get to that final end.
It starts by waking up the hearts and minds of the people, which is what The Highwire does every single week. But ultimately, you have to deal with legislators, and you have to deal with government, because as long as they're bringing it, for those of you that tried to get on a plane during COVID and weren't allowed to without proof of vaccination, for those of you trying to go to work but lost your job because you refused to, because you didn't have a vaccination and could not show proof of it, those mandates were real. And so unlike this person that's talking, I actually care about you too.
Just because some of us have opted out, just because I have a job where I can say, hey man, stay in your ground, I get it. I work at The Highwire. I'm[…]”
From The Highwire with Del Bigtree: THE SCIENCE OF STRATEGY: ICAN LEGISLATE’S VACCINE CONFIDENCE BILL DEMYSTIFIED, Jun 19, 2024
Expecting a Presidential candidate to say anything to the benefit of the people would be merely for keeping the hoards dumb down. Presidents do more things that are alike than not!
Government is just a violent organization that "Traffics' the 'citizens' utilizing enFORCE - ment to make people obey....I mean where is the first place most people have their first encounter with the police? "In Traffic"
"Mankind" works best when life is "Voluntary" not forced!
When enFORCEment is employed by a few against the many without their full knowledge and understanding it just breeds unnatural result after unnatural result until we have a shit hole of a world where the only people not suffering are the 1% of the 1% who own and control the majority of the worlds wealth, resources and influence all governments regardless of political ideology, largely creating the world we all are born into.
How about abolish government?
Ever thought about having that discussion?!
Because NOTHING will change if you allow, promote, sanction, vote for a system of governance. The Psychopathic Parasites will always rise in such a system.
The people who fail to see this are less aware of immediate reality than a drunkard. I'm just sayin'!
Be careful: the absence of evidence for a virus said to cause an infectious disease does not mean that there is no disease.
It could be that viruses are a misconception: some kind of toxin, or maybe something else, causes some sort of brain damage in a dog, which manifests with certain consistent symptoms. And because we are talking about a dog, its cheaper to kill it than to try to save its life, as we would probably do with a human being.
Then, it's easier to pretend it was a contagious disease, to perhaps cover up the responsibility of someone who, perhaps unintentionally, contaminated a place with some garbage and this caused the poisoning. And because this lie is so credible by most, it's also easy to invent an invisible virus. If they said it was a bacterium, visible under certain conditions, then they would really have to work to keep the cover story alive. But with viruses is far easier to lie and protect industrial interest, or anything else. After all, viruses (and the much smaller "haptens") are very difficult to work with, and to prove anything about them. Maybe, the virus is just cellular debris, packing a more or less consistent type of genetic information, if at all. If it only happens to be at the same place at the same time, then maybe it hasn't caused any disease, but is a consequence of the disease caused by some toxin. This alternative story is not without critique, because if the debris look very much the same across different cases of the same disease, then that seems to be a pattern, not a chaotic crumbling of decaying and ill tissue. If this is correct, maybe there are a few candidate explanations that have not been considered yet, that do not involve the idea of contagious disease. For example, the always controversial 5g.
So. Do dogs have rabies, some times? I don't know. But if you ever see an angry dog, be careful to not get attacked. At least you may get wounds, and these may hurt and get infected and even superinfected, and that would be even more pain for you, and maybe some toxin manages to find the way to the blood, and maybe it goes to some vital organ, and maybe you get something more life threatening than a wound caused by a non-human animal.
My friend, I think you suffer from a bit of a fever. I will help you overcome it and enjoy a gentle stroll above the blissful waters of the sea of Rationality. Careful with the sargassum, you may trip over.
1. Viruses can be both a big, fat lie and a misconception. The first pair of adjectives belongs to the sphere of political activism. The term misconception is somewhat formal, and not very much exciting.
It's a term that a Herr Professor Stefan Lanka would use.
You have to take into account the extreme difficulty of studying living things. Studying inert matter, like a Roselite mineral, is easier: they don't change very fast. And studying dead things is also easier: they don't complain as much as living things.
There is a phenomenon everyone agrees is real: inheritance. Or the simple observation that one living thing produces another living thing that resembles a lot like itself. Quite a remarkable miracle that life is self-organizing and does not need decisive Governmental action and more budget to sustain itself.
How do we, mere ignorant mortals, explain this thing that a pine tree begets pine trees and not vines, and little bacteria beget little bacteria and not giant worms, and elephants beget elephants and not weasels?
To answer that, we have come up with the little theory of genetics. Which may be mostly true, or mostly false, or half-and-half, or completely false. I don't know enough about it.
And here is our viral problem. Biologists study (painstakingly) those Petri dishes and those test tubes and all the weird chemicals and preparations and machines they use. They see dead and decaying tissues. They get genetic material through the controlled demolition of those Vero E6 kidney cells. They analyze the genetic material. They see a pattern. Repeatedly.
If there is a pattern, that material has to have some meaning. They remember the fable of the mean viruses who invade perfectly healthy cells and do terrible things to it, causing disease in tissues (liver, lungs). Those greedy capitalist viruses just can't have enough and keep parasitizing the noble worker proletarians cells and exploit them and take their rights and finally kill them, and everyone is sad in the kibbutz. (Do you see the projection of insane human ideologies on supposedly scientific research yet?)
When the scientist tries to connect the results of the experiments with the current myths that rule science, he says "Aha! Eureka! I found a virus! There is no other explanation! This abundant genetic material caused disease and is a virus! I'm a genius! Where is my Nobel Prize and my hat for orgies with minors? I have to celebrate this new discovery!" That's how it goes. In this sense, and trying not to imply that all virologists are sex criminals and psychopath narcissists (only a minority of them happen to be that), we get the result that viruses are indeed a misconception: the scientists is not interpreting correctly the results of the experiments, because the field is corrupt.
And then the critics go on to explain more details about how this thing is so wrong, trying to not use language that is too insulting to people who may not be evil and may be recovered for the cause of science.
Now enter the activists. Obviously, an activist has to use extreme language. He needs to bring attention to an obscure topic. So, activists say: the virus is a big, fat lie.
But the target audience of the serious critic and the activist is different. The language has to be different.
I think we all understand that.
2. Northern Tracy is a nice Irish lady who loves dogs and cats and hamsters and several other critters. She strongly dislikes the violence exerted on animals in scientific research and in the manufacturing of medicines or what have you. So, she is an activist. But she is also an intellectual critic. She wrote that article where she argues against Genetics. Great article. Also many other good scribblings she has. We all learned a lot by reading it.
But it's just one critic against a gigantic behemoth of industrial and military interest. The acitivists, who are always more used to the passions of the soul than used to rationality, are impatient and make the mistake that one little stone should be enough to kill the beast. Not so!
It seems there has always been criticism about the DNA model, by many thinkers. Basically, everyone knows it's fake, but they go along with it, because there is no way to change it. The system has too much inertia as it runs down the hill in direction to the precipice. Everything sucks.
But it is a very good thing that learned people set aside time to inform the public of the problems that every official truth of the regime has.
Activists should be smart and never eat their own. For example, if a small time lawyer has to argue something crazy and wrong to defend the particular health interest of one client, activists should not attack the small time lawyer for not telling all the truths. Truth may not be aceptable in courts of law. Bummer.
A different issue happens when a big time lawyer tries to engage in political activism to change the law, or when he is preparing a rhetorical minefield for a future big case, with the aim to establish some sort of jurisprudence, that favors the medical freedom movement interests. If he makes bad arguments that are going to fail, it's a good idea to denounce that. That does not count as eating your own. But activists are generally not learned enough to do such a fine job. You need a learned and experienced person to do that job.
Activists are useful, but should know their proper place. If they want more, they have to study more, and reach the level of the activist-intellectual. This has a ton of merit by the way.
This is important to understand why people use the arguments of geneticists against genetics.
The difficult concept of "viral load" which is an application of quantitative PCR not-a-test, was implanted in medical practice using techniques of persuasion, and the critics have been using techniques of persuasion to dismantle such concept.
Nothing is easy about this scientific war.
We need the miracle of Rationality, and learn to tread above water.
I am not your friend, don't use such derogatory terms to belittle me.
"we have come up with the little theory of genetics": actually it's not a theory, it's a dogma, called the central dogma of genetics. So, it has never been proven. So, why would I believe it? The fact that we cannot explain something doesn't mean we have to invent some stupid dogma and have "science" reach "consensus" on that.
"The system has too much inertia": that's only because there are still too many cowardly corrupt brainwashed dumbass fools working for and in the system. There will be a day when "difficult times create strong men again".
"The difficult concept of "viral load"": it's not difficult, as there is no virus, and thus there is no viral load.
It wasn't my intention to belittle you as a person, or your argument. What I'm doing is giving you clues to be nicer to people in online conversations or debates. You don't like the clues I offer. That's too bad. But keep reading, please.
When I use the term "little" in "little theory of genetics" I'm using ironic language. The field of genetics is vast. Virology is much smaller.
We are using a different sense of the word theory. To avoid confusion, let me explain my usage of the term, and I will explain how I perceive you are using it as I describe differences, and then maybe you can respond if you agree with the distinction or not.
A theory, in my usage of the term, is not something that is true, or confirmed, or verified. A theory is a coherent set of hypothesis and data and methods, designed to attempt to explain something. Theories may be completely wrong. And wrong theories may be wrong because they carry too many errors, or because they are made up. In this latter sense, a theory is a political weapon, not an attempt at explaining anything. In politics, everything is obscurity and confusion.
I think, maybe I'm wrong, you are using the word theory to refer to scientific truths. To certainty. This is very outmoded, and many other people will ignore that usage, and ignore your comments. But I think this usage has some merit: A good explanation of some real phenomenon should be based on truth.
But we are way past this. Currently, scientists all agree they have no clue about anything and it's better this way (This is a bit of a joke, and a bit of an insult to the pitiful state of epistemology these days.)
As you can see, the confusion is now clear: I was using the term theory in a very broad sense, and you were using it in a narrow sense.
But you also say that genetics is based on the central dogma of genetics, and that is why genetics is false. This is wrong, in my opinion. You are being mislead by your bias against the word dogma. A very common bias, by the way. A dogma is simply a teaching. It can be a correct teaching or a false teaching. Just because something is traditionally taught or passed down does not mean it is false or wrong. In the particular case of the so called "central dogma of genetics" it has been shown to be wrong for about 40 years. Nevertheless, all students learn it, and learn why it's false, and keep using it when it's convenient.
But, as you already know, this dogma is smaller than genetics in general. It's just one important claim, but not the whole deal. The claim can be formulated this way: nuclear DNA is transcribed into mRNA by enzymes, and RNA is translated into proteins in ribosomes, but proteins cannot be translated back into mRNA, and mRNA cannot be transcribed back into DNA. And this dogma was "proven" wrong when they had to invent a method (the enzyme called "reverse transcriptase" or "retrotranscriptase") for RNA viruses to attach themselves permanently to the DNA of a DNA-based organism. This is also wrong, but this invention killed the central dogma of genetics. After that, they the also vast field of genetic engineering went into full swing, and the attempts at developing genetically modified organisms became a big target for research money. Without the limit of the dogma, they could start tinkering around on whiteboards and with computer scripting languages and databases, thus creating a huge business opportunity.
But I claim, and I guess you will agree, that genetics is more than DNA and RNA. We have to talk about aminoacids and bases, for example. Or the relationship of ATP and the supposed double spiral of DNA. Or the fact that not all cells have DNA, and that there is DNA in other places. And maybe both the bases and the aminoacids are chemicals which have been given characteristics and abilities they don't really have. And maybe the bases do not really exist as described. And the bizarre idea (and very dogmatic idea) that all living organisms share this scheme of bases and codons that produce one aminoacid and nothing else, because (Darwinism alert) all currently living organism descend from a hypothetical most recent common ancestor. Of which there is exactly zero empirical evidence. This is inventive reasoning at its best, and everyone should feel appalled by this wild jumping at conclusions.
No one can explain yet how the bases first appeared, how they first attached to each other in that specific way, what inert chemical first produced the bases, or whether first there were the aminoacids and these formed in a yet to be explained way the first protein pattern, which, by pure chance, created a mold somewhere, and this became the first sequence of bases, and all this happened outside cells and nuclei because those came much later, and there is no way to describe the conditions where all this first happened: temperature, pressure, pH, EM radiation, composition of the air, the chemicals present in the water, the amount of light, the type of light. Nothing is known, but student are told that it happened. Isn't all this very weird?
Genetics is a very big science. Or a big chapter of the quest of human inquiry. And many things about it are probably wrong. And I don't have enough knowledge to say for sure what is correct and what is not correct.
It's very tempting to throw everything out. But given the current state of the institutions that rule over us, it's going to take a lot of effort in non-violent communication to persuade people to rethink everything and change course.
Finally, I mention the concept of viral load and I claim it is a difficult concept, because it is a very iffy construct that abuses PCR. It's basically a form of divination. People with "viral" hepatitis are diagnosed with it and later they are told whether the medicines work also using the same method of abusing quantitative PCR. This is, in my opinion, a sad state of affairs, because people see their lives altered by the diagnosis and the treatment of a disease whose origin is probably not viral. In other words, they are secretly being used as part of scientific research. Not cool! Patients should not be beguiled like that.
But we cannot persuade scientists to stop abusing people by abusing them. In some cases, scientists do not even realize the damage they are doing to people.
A more humane treatment of confused people could be useful in this task of dispelling the myths about viral disease.
No one should confuse the need to make noise to bring attention to this corruption of medical science, with the correct way to communicate with scientists.
Sometimes, a little of diplomacy goes a long way. Thugs and bullies give the no-virus camp a bad reputation and make everything more difficult.
I don't think Siri will be able to understand clinical trials or medical content unless he restudies high school biology, math, and chemistry all the way up to college level.
I suggest we test these vaccines on persons who can give consent, and that we choose from a pool of people pushing these vaccines; doctors, politicians, MSM reporters, FDA employees and other puppets.
Aaron Siri has proven himself to be a legal genius in all of the cases that he has won for Ican. I don’t think you can win these cases without a cunning understanding of how to play the system. I suspect he’s playing a long game here. His firm is responsible for our knowledge that the FDA wanted to block the release of documents for 75 years. He has also one other significant battles,. I can’t think of another legal firm that has made more progress in exposing the horrific corruption in the Covid 19 “vaccine” debacle.
He as not as genius as you paint him to be. He is a competent attorney and done a good work in the past. What he is proposing here is an atrocity, lack of ethics and endangers our kids, so we need to discuss it. Bad ideas need to be discussed and dismissed, that's how we arrive at the truth.
Sasha, don't take things out of context. Just the 4 minutes don't paint the whole picture. When Aaron says that the covid 'vaccines' had a rigorous testing, which was obvious a sarcastic comment, it was in comparison with other vaccines that had a monitoring time of 3 or 5 DAYS! A 2 month monitoring for the covid injections in comparison could be called 'rigorous'. We all understand that keeping the results secret for 55/75 year was a warning to not trust this testing.
The 4 minutes is a complete set 2 questions and 2 answers. He never clarified his statements, despite numerous attempts by me and others. Secondly, the legal complaint demanding that HepB vaccine tested on infants and children by Siri and Gilmstad is complete, too. I read it. It leaves no room for imagination.
Of course, since your position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths associated with them, and due to no evidence that vaccines prevent anything is the only right position, and I appreciate that. But where do you think you get into court with that position? I don't think anywhere, and also Aaron knows that gets you nowhere. I am still of the opinion that it was a sarcastic comment of Aaron. He knows exactly what is wrong with 'vaccines' and bioweapons.
yes, you can get into court with the position that 1)vaccines have caused documented harms for centuries, and the data are well compiled; 2) the FDA DOES NOT regulate vaccines as medicine and fully condones toxic materials, adulteration and contamination (Katherine Watt has compiled a mountain of legal research on this matter, it is black and white in law); 3)forcing knowingly harmful substances is a violation of many provisions in law and US Constitution. There are many ways to get in court. What is presented in Siri's petition is a lawsuit-to-nowhere, a publicity stunt for funding and press coverage, and an incompetent unethical show.
The problem is that none of the people that you need to confess the harms, are willing to do that. See what happens here in Alberta, Canada.
The president of the section of pediatrics for the Alberta Medical Association finds the claims "saddening" fringe views, informed by hearsay and innuendo.
Sam Wong said he has not read anything in official pediatrics or medical literature that supports views that mRNA vaccines are untested or dangerous for children.
"I can't see any drawbacks to the use of the mRNA vaccination in children or adults," Wong said.
"The broad view of pediatricians across Canada, of the infectious diseases group, is that the mRNA vaccinations are safe and effective."
I think these people are evil.
Our Premier for a year now, also knew exactly what was going on.
Smith herself declined to get the widely available Pfizer or Moderna inoculations, choosing instead to fly to Arizona to get a non-mRNA vaccine that wasn't available at the time in Canada.
"all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths" - that's the wrong reasoning. The fundamental reason is: viruses don't exist.
I need to read your post here before commenting any further. I won't have time for that until this evening. I merely listened to the 4-minute clip you posted and had to make an immediate comment. <g>
I would agree with you regarding all of the cases he has won for ICAN and for CHD. But, his testimony in the above 4-minute clip was abhorrent. If he's that scientifically ignorant, he needs to be schooled by someone who does understand.
Is he a parent? But it is probably a way to trap the rats. We need to get involved more. The idea that any Govt. agency can mandate access to my body or my children or countrymen or world population is absolutely abhorrent and unacceptable.
As I remember my research into Fauci’s unpaid-for crimes, he would go to poor families in New York?, diagnose their child with HIV and strap them down in a hospital bed for a lab rat, using the drugs that produced the same symptoms as this mysterious sudden AIDS. The parents were bullied, threatened with child removal if they didn’t let Fauci be in charge. That is pure Murder. There is a big death plot with the children that were used as Guinea pigs.
This example is why no “Medical Doctor or Health Official can ever subvert parental rights, or human rights. Besides many that are incompetent, sadistic, clueless, maybe demented, sold out to Pharma or have forgotten their Med School lessons, which are also full of baseless science and holes, wearing a white coat is not a badge of authority,
Yes, look up Peter Duesberg "Inventing the AIDs virus", out of print but try inter-library loan-that's what I had to do. Celia Farber, "Serious Adverse Events", Jon Rappoport "AIDs Inc". These and others cover all the tricks they had for promulgating the AIDs con and preying on poor people. There is a special spot in hell for Fauci, and not just for what he did to dogs.
I think it would be rude, convenient or lazy to shove the heavy lifting onto God. Living with this level of criminality is inflammatory at spiritual depths.
I disagree. He completely misses the root of the problem. "Vaccines", all vaccines, are deadly, both short and long term. He needs to read the legal work laid out by Katherine Watt at Bailiwicks News and get familiar with Sasha's analysis. Peace.
Good Lord! EVERYONE knows that this experimental therapy received the most cursory studies before being inflicting it upon the public. These Kabuki hearings are just designed to sow doubt and to delay the inevitable. IMHO crimes were committed, numerous people have died AND justice must be served. Pax
I've been following the work of Aaron Siri, Del Bigtree, Sasha Latypova, Jeffery Jaxen and many others for years. All have important voices in the medical freedom movement.
Mr. Siri, have you read the following article by Sasha Latypova arguing against your legal positions with respect to FDA and vaccine trials?
She makes some good points, especially those quoted below. Please consider responding to Latypova's article.
"My position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths associated with them, and due to no evidence that vaccines prevent anything. At a minimum, the right to refuse injections of anything, regardless whether it is good or bad for you should be universally upheld and protected. Every parent should be educated to stop poisoning their children. The government officials should be prosecuted for lying to the public.
Finally, vaccine manufacturing is not regulated by the FDA at all! They only present a false-front to fool the parents and the healthcare providers that it is a regulated product class.
Latypova states that "Katherine’s analysis is a much better basis for a legal complaint v FDA. Siri and Gilmstad would be well served evaluating this material and amending their ill-conceived strategy."
Thank you very much for considering the above information.
I also used that contact form earlier today to send the following recommendation to Attorney Siri:
-----
Hello,
Attorney Aaron Siri's June 27th testimony to the New Hampshire House Committee on COVID Response Efficacy was appalling. In part, Attorney Siri really has no idea how toxic the lipid nanoparticle envelope is. He should not be testifying about the scientific aspects of "vaccines".
Please advise Attorney Siri that he should view the following Dr. David E. Martin and Dr. Judy A. Mikovits presentation to Attorneys Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Rocco Galati regarding Covid-19 injection products:
Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device. (duration - 9:16)
Thanks. I was sitting here wondering why many others appeared to be missing facts such as the one you state. I am also stunned. I never dreamed Aaron Siri is so clueless scientifically. Perhaps many people do not realize the breadth and depth of scientific training we go through to understand the science. Siri didn't even appear to have a basic grasp of the toxicity of the lipid nanoparticle envelope. He should start by listening to the following David Martin, Judy Mikovits explanation to RFK, Jr and Rocco Galati:
Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device. (duration: 9:16)
All these cats run in the same group. They know each other well & get together at their events often. They break bread together bro. I suspect Aaron Siri gets funding from Bigtree who gets it from Abbey Rockefeller & other seedy characters. They were all out at her ranch, enjoying lunch & conversation, along with Malone & others. Very suspect. Bigtree was overheard at a local private event last year saying “We are very well funded”. Just sayin.
Why would a Rockefeller want to fund The Highwire and the VAXXED series of documentaries? Bigtree has convincingly proven in a Highwire episode that absolutely none of the "vaccines" on the Childhood Immunization Schedule have been proven to be "safe and effective". The WHO has blatantly lied regarding "safe and effective".
And, perhaps anyone accepting the money will at least temper their actions, with the thought of keeping the money coming? Plus, the money giver may gain an idea of the direction it's fund recipients may be heading?
Before the Cvd, the highwire was a fringe media outlet. Bigtree was criticised heavily. I don't know when they began receiving the Rockefeller money but when someone is struggling with finance it would be the best opportunity to interfere.
Money is money. They can work both sides. Not sayin they aren’t doing good things, but just very sus that they openly discussed being at Abbey’s ranch & breaking bread with her & Malone & others. Then, at same private event, was overheard saying they’re “very well funded”. I don’t pretend to know it all. No one has all the answers. But this, to me, is suspect. Following the money trails tells you alot. Whitney Webb is excellent at this. Knowing the connections is important. If they’re only for the good of the people, I am glad. Sometimes the money trails can tell you all you need to know. I would like to know if they’re getting any funds from a Rockefeller.
Thanks for your comment. I was thinking the testing is like the vaccines. When they fail the. response is to do more. When the testing fails to predict problems, do more of the same testing.
Dr. Hazan determined that the COVID shots wipe out the bifidobacteria. Millenials who were already immune compromised by childhood vaccines died within days of their mandated shots. Not all died … merely tens of thousands, depending on their history and the vial contents…sloppy DOD manufacturing. A complicated convolution, like a pinball hitting the right combination of bumpers to end up in the “death” bin. The Silent Vietnam War.
Because the important effects of the shots on trial participants were subclinical and long term … no attention to compromise of the gut flora … the effect on individuals that differ in critical detail from the trial participants was not predictable: the fundamental understanding was missing. So, testing is not “robust” if you don’t know what to look for. I postulate this is true for all the vaccines. Ten-year-olds who did not show chicken pox rash but get shingles from the vaccine virus … it was not sterilized by immune response but instead hosted in the gut only to show up later.
Sloppy DOD manufacturing may well be intentional, given the depopulation agenda.
I am very interested in the number of pregnant women in the Covid-19 trials who were excluded from the trials, with no explanation recorded in the documents.. There were a well over a hundred, weren't there? These are the documents that they wanted held back for 75 years. I've wondered why there couldn't be a lawsuit to uncover that information, given that the CDC is still recommending jabbing pregnant women.
I don't think Siri will be able to understand clinical trials or medical content unless he restudies high school biology, math, and chemistry all the way up to college level.
You hit the nail on the head with this. I could remove the people and the issue (vaccines) and swap it out for 'gender transition' and the same thing is happening. They need more studies they tell the public, big ones with lots of deceived children and their duped parents to create large fudged datasets to continue to build their industry. The only people in industry that would participate are morally bankrupt. The industry needs to be shut down.
What do you mean MORE studies? This implies that some safety studies have been performed. Aaron Siri is winning cases by making the bureaucrats and government officials admit that there are actually ZERO safety studies done for any vaccine. Watch the trials. Listen to the audio as he backs these people into tiny little corners. He is brilliant. Watch the Highwire, they’re the only ones getting this shit right.
more studies = more fuel for lawsuits by siri & glimstad (even if those lawsuits are well intentioned)
so a few innocent babies get killed along the way? gotta have that rigorous science. after all, as del bigtree's mantra goes, "where there is risk there must be choice."
Imagine for a moment that all vaccines are pulled from the market and overnight the American public recognizes all vaccines for what they are- poisons forcibly applied to children via government diktats for the benefit of Pharma financial cartels aka racketeering.
What would this do to the business model of the Highwire and CHD? They too would implode overnight.
If you want to work for either of these organizations you will go along with this or you will be pushed out. Both of these outfits pimp the lab leak BS to the hilt also. Cashing on the mythology and fear.
Both outfits and their head honcho's like to play the "thin line" of appearing to be radical in their positions while in reality they are tepid reformists which is at best a losing strategy not to mention flat out dishonest.
Neither Bigtree or Kennedy are opposed to vaccines. This fact comes as a surprise when you tell their fans this and when you quote them directly to support this position most people are shocked that they didn't know this.
Safely tested poisons distributed in smaller doses. That's where these people are at. And frankly Pharma should agree to this as they can reinvent their business model (they are trying to do so with mRNA poisons) and extend this racketeering operation out another hundred years.
good point. By the way, if all vaccines are removed and all the "pandemic laws" overturned, I will shut down this stack and continue with my art-only stack. That would be dream come true...
As long as the Amish refuse all vaccines and don't get the diseases that those vaccines are suppose to prevent, I am sure I can do without any vaccines too.
A 2017 study on the Amish conducted by Northwestern University in the US and Tohoku University in Japan found that compared to the general population of the US, the Amish have 1) a 10-year longer life expectancy and 2) a lower incidence of diabetes. https://www.planet-today.com/2024/03/amish-officially-declared-worlds.html?m=1
I think there might be an unpleasant transition period during which the adults who received childhood vaccines rather than actually contracting the illnesses will get them as cases increase. Some of those diseases are much harder on adults. I think part of the myth of lifelong immunity from childhood vaccines has been bolstered by the lifetime immunity obtained from contracting the disease. When these shots were first given most of the population had actual immunity. Now those people are dying and you will be left with a majority population that have less robust to virtually no immunity because those shots are not nearly as effective as they claim. It is evident in the mumps vaccine with increasing cases in the vaccinated. The pertussis vaccine has lost effectiveness and their answer seems to be more doses of something that doesn’t work. They are in real pickle with polio also. I think their answers in court under oath are revelatory and different than their pr campaigns to encourage public compliance. Besides the loss of revenue, if too many parents opt out the lies and incompetence of those in authority will become apparent and that must be prevented at all costs. Besides epidemics in the vaccinated what if there is a decline in autism and chronic disease in children? If I am wrong in my thinking let me know, l am just an observer not a professional
It's not that vaccines have LOST effectiveness. They were NEVER EFFECTIVE in the first place. Vaccines are effective only in causing harm - causing immune, digestive, and nervous system dysfunction. Vaccines are one of the major causes of disease conditions.
There is a generational component to health and lack of health. I've read that toxins go down at least four generations. In other words, if my great grandmother was exposed to toxins, it may affect me. All female children may be more affected because each woman carries her potential offspring from her own birth. Or, maybe that doesn't matter.
I believe each vaxxed generation is weaker/sicklier than the less vaxxed generation before it. To this, figure in breast-fed or formula-fed... Breast-fed from a healthy mom contrasted with two or three generations of infants fed synthetic milk formula with synthetic vitamins and incorrect fat content. Add to that poor food in both moms and children.
It has been known for over fifty years that breast fed babies were less damaged from vaccines than formula-fed babies. Breast milk creates a healthier microbiome and somewhat neutralizes some toxins
People need to get past the idea there are viruses called measles, polio, chicken pox, HIV etc. that cause symptoms like fever, rashes, and even worse conditions such as paralysis. Severe conditions are usually caused by toxins and poisons such as pesticides and herbicides and metals. The symptoms we name as diseases are the body cleansing through rashes, coughing, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, etc. Our bodies are throwing off what doesn't belong.
IMO we all might want to learn some basics (and then some) about how to make our bodies healthy. We need to not freak out if we get a fever or a rash. We need to be more discerning about when we take antibiotics or other medicines. We need to question the medical narratives. We need to not ask the doctors....
from personal observation, i agree that people are generally becoming less hardy. all the environmental and medical insults are taking their toll generationally. this is harder for younger people to see because they know nothing else and people tend to normalize the familiar. there are vaccines that reduce the number of cases of certain diseases-measles, rubella, chicken pox, but the down steam effects can be undesirable-side effects, not providing lifetime protection, in the case of varicella trading chicken pox incidence for increases in shingles, a more serious disease. i believe for a long time the cdc tried to deny this, i remember reading a paper by one of their minions saying it wasnt happening and he was at a loss as how there could be any experiment or conclusions made. then a british dr in a bmj rapid response came up with something immediately, which lead me to believe the first guy was just and apologist for the cdc wishful thinking and dishonesty, at any rate, before the varicella vax, shingles was more prevalent in married couples with no children than in married couples with children, afterwards that difference went away. it is of interest that the covid shots triggered shingles revealing that they undermine immune function. i think luck, terrain, and genetics all make for differences in health but also think there are bacterial and viral illnesses and that sometimes you can do everything right and still contract them
I think you are unfair. Kennedy’s campaign position is to end the chronic disease epidemic … as if he does not already know what the causes are, vaccines a big component of the global poisoning.
If you read his books and listen to his interviews this is abundantly clear.
Most people at CHD brought professional skills from elsewhere, no one is afraid of going back to it with health freedom accomplished. Why do you imagine everyone is so mercenary? Does this reflect your own outlook? They are all fighting for you and you are putting them down.
Kennedy talks about more “studies” where needed because the courts require them. Everything he does and says has been mercilessly censored by MSM. A public addicted to vaccines has to be educated. He’s saying “we will prove it to you.” He is not picking a fight. He says we want “safe vaccines,” a statement no one can disagree with. …at the same time knowing the vaccines are inherently unsafe by the manufacturer’s own admission. All vaccines attack the human microbiome. As such they cannot benefit health. The public does not know this because researchers like Dr. Hazan cannot get published. Listen to her presentation to Sen Johnson’s hearing. Moreover current safety studies are way inadequate, but currently accepted by the courts. This has to change.
When citizens have the definitive information that holds to the flame the feet of legislators , health boards and judges … they will. Doctors have already damaged their credibility beyond repair. But the fight for free press and scientific literature lies ahead.
No, I'm not being unfair at all. I happen to know these people quite well. The problem is that you are "a fan" and are dealing in emotion. Your aspersions and numerous fallacies in your comment Illustrate how deeply in denial you are. I've read RFK's books (for analysis) and have seen Hazan speak numerous times (she has nothing to offer anyone and knows not of what she is saying). BTW RFK has openly and often bragged about the fact that all his children are vaccinated. He also believes and pushes the lie that there was a pandemic
The CHD people aren't "fighting for me" (laughs) they are in fact one of the biggest impediments for people understanding the entirety of the Covid Operation and openly and often refused to openly debate people on multiple issues. The one time RFK did do so was when he had D Rancourt on his podcast and Rancourt made him look like a fool.
Shall I go into great detail? Likely it wouldn't matter an iota as you have established your basis for evaluating a situation on the words narrated by your “hero” or someone you automatically defer to -you uncritically accept these words as truths regardless of the substance of the claims- you are operating on a level of superficial emotional reaction.
You will no longer be capable of perceiving concepts or evaluating ideas as you have outsourced your critical thinking skills to this cult-like leader.
We see this phenomenon in the "Covid dissent movement" where so-called alt-health leaders perpetuate various quack theories and their fans or followers accept these hypotheses simply based on the fact that their "hero" made a claim- no concrete evidence needed.
The followers of RFK Jr. are the worst of the batch.
Not that anything can shake the faith of a 'true believer' but many of us have been in opposition to all vaccines unconditionally and for many years before RFK and his outfit came onto the scene.
This comes from years of study and goes far beyond what 'Bobby' will ever do.
Additionally, we have received zero financial benefit from this, which is not something Kennedy and his crew can say.
We could also get into many other positions which Kennedy supports which are outright abominable but again critical thinking is not possible when emotive adulation at play.
It's clear both Bigtree and RFK Jr. are NOT opposed to vaccines. Both of them believe in Convid and in 'safe' vaccines. Please reconsider standing up for people like RFK Jr. and Dr. Hazan just because they are censored by the MSM. They are 'fighting' for people and that is why we should not be critical? Come on! "All vaccines attack the human microbiome. As such they cannot benefit health. The public does not know this because researchers like Dr. Hazan cannot get published." This is where you make a mistake: you make the public dependent on a scientist and on MSM/Scientific publishers. In my opinion the public doesn't know that all vaccines attack the micriobiome because the people that have been funding the development of vaccines for centuries are nefarious ánd they own the MSM, Alternative Media (97%), Universities and Scientific publishers.
Del Bigtree and RFK Jr, may state that they believe that it may be possible to develop 'safe' vaccines, but, that DOES NOT MEAN that they both believe there ARE currently 'safe' vaccines.
As a matter of fact, Bigtree contends that there are currently NO SAFE VACCINES:
If you can find the time to watch the following entire video, it's more than well worth your time.
SHOCKING VACCINE ADMISSIONS FROM INSIDE THE W.H.O.
The above video of a supposedly closed "Global Vaccine Safety Summit" at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, on December 2-3, 2019, was secretly recorded and passed to Del Bigtree's ICAN organization. During this meeting, the worlds top vaccine officials lamented that there is not adequate safety data for any vaccine; and, the global public is starting to become aware of this fact.
Then, at time = 1:23:54 - Video statement by WHO Chief Scientist, 4 days prior to the Vaccine Safety Summit, where she states vaccines are very safe and we have a robust vaccine safety surveillance system.
But, then, this statement by WHO Chief Scientist, 4-days later:
"We cannot over emphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring system in many countries (and, often, when there's questions about deaths, "there's obfuscation"). "Risks are always there; and, the population needs to understand that and feel confidant that mechanisms are being put in place to study some of those things."
And, finally, Del Bigtree: "Are they lying? Can I use the word 'lying? W.H.O. - Is the WHO lying to you? Let me go out on a limb here: Yes. The World Health Organization, the leading authority of vaccine programs around the world, sponsored and funded by the pharmaceutical industry, the Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation, governments around the world, is lying to the world."
I did not state that Bigtree and RFK Jr. believe there currently ARE safe vaccines. From about July 2021 onwards I watched ALL of THW episodes and I receive the HW insiders e-mails because I like to check facts.
Bigtree believes in viruses and maybe therefor believes that we need vaccines. The 'science' behind viruses is fraudulent. Viruses cannot survive when seperated from the host and therefor cannot be transmitted outside of the body. I consider THW to be one of the best CO-alt-media where people are getting some truth, namely the truth 'they' are willing to share.
"It's clear both Bigtree and RFK Jr. are NOT opposed to vaccines."
Bigtree has effectively admitted to Sacha Stone in an interview that he is on board with (for want of a better term) 'terrain theory' but he does not have time to educate his audience because that would require him to spend 45 minutes at the start of each show explaining it to them.
He basically accused his own viewers of being too dumb to understand anything outside of the mainstream 'germ theory' paradigm. He said (my emphasis) "I'm left using the LIES and the language of the dreamscape, the matrix that we're living in..."
He went on to say "I have to speak the truth of the world that people believe in".
That quote should win some sort of prize for Orwellian double speak.
In another interview on the Alex Jones show (I think it was) he admitted that covid was a religion and that they couldn't even find the virus!
So he accused his own viewers of being too dumb, but doesn't want to take the time to make one episode explaining the truth about Convid and vaccines and instead asks for money in EVERY episode?
AJ belongs to 'them', 'they' live and operate by a code. The code is that 'they' have to tell the truth about what 'they' are doing, 'they' have been using AJ and 97% of the other Alt-Media for that reason. Bigtree falls in that 97% controlled Alt-Media category.
“Now let me state very clearly that the mission of the Informed Consent Action Network my mission, The Highwire, Aaron's mission, in all the work that we do is to end mandates forever. I don't believe that any medical intervention should ever be mandated upon you. And we are working to get to that final end.
It starts by waking up the hearts and minds of the people, which is what The Highwire does every single week. But ultimately, you have to deal with legislators, and you have to deal with government, because as long as they're bringing it, for those of you that tried to get on a plane during COVID and weren't allowed to without proof of vaccination, for those of you trying to go to work but lost your job because you refused to, because you didn't have a vaccination and could not show proof of it, those mandates were real. And so unlike this person that's talking, I actually care about you too.
Just because some of us have opted out, just because I have a job where I can say, hey man, stay in your ground, I get it. I work at The Highwire. I'm[…]”
From The Highwire with Del Bigtree: THE SCIENCE OF STRATEGY: ICAN LEGISLATE’S VACCINE CONFIDENCE BILL DEMYSTIFIED, Jun 19, 2024
Take the largest "health freedom" outfit in the US, and the world I believe, RFK's Children's Health Defense. The entire edifice for this organization and RFK's credibility are now dependent on the "Wuhan lab leak", "gain of function" BS which is beyond a shadow of a doubt complete bunk.
And this has been pointed out directly and repeatedly to those in the highest positions of CHD (for over two years BTW) and they have chosen to dismiss/ignore such evidence as they know it destroys the story they would have everyone believe.
They know darn well of the barbarism in the nursing homes and hospitals and how that disrupts their claim of "viral pandemic" caused by GoF pathogen.
Currently such organizations and individuals that sit atop the alleged "health freedom movement" are THE biggest impediment to widespread understanding of what actually happened in 2020 (and beyond) and they are the most dishonest of all in my view.
“Now let me state very clearly that the mission of the Informed Consent Action Network my mission, The Highwire, Aaron's mission, in all the work that we do is to end mandates forever. I don't believe that any medical intervention should ever be mandated upon you. And we are working to get to that final end.
It starts by waking up the hearts and minds of the people, which is what The Highwire does every single week. But ultimately, you have to deal with legislators, and you have to deal with government, because as long as they're bringing it, for those of you that tried to get on a plane during COVID and weren't allowed to without proof of vaccination, for those of you trying to go to work but lost your job because you refused to, because you didn't have a vaccination and could not show proof of it, those mandates were real. And so unlike this person that's talking, I actually care about you too.
Just because some of us have opted out, just because I have a job where I can say, hey man, stay in your ground, I get it. I work at The Highwire. I'm[…]”
From The Highwire with Del Bigtree: THE SCIENCE OF STRATEGY: ICAN LEGISLATE’S VACCINE CONFIDENCE BILL DEMYSTIFIED, Jun 19, 2024
always surprised to read how many mothers are willing to have their babies, toddlers, children (and themselves) injected with unknown products, but it is good that there are... the only time I can understand is when there is no other available treatment - like a friend with cancer who tried a new product until she got too sick to try any further. Obviously it did not do the job...
Just like my daughter, married to a “medical professional “ who is all in on whatever comes down the farma shit chute. 12 years old grandson just got the hpv. He doesn’t have a cervix but the notion of shared burden and solidarity resonates. His father has to take him to get the shots in order to chase him down and pin him when he runs away trying to escape. This fall they will be first in line for the grand new combo vax. I know that if I say a word it will harden their position so I say nothing and just hope they wake up, and that it doesn’t take a tragedy for that to happen.
Richard I am so sorry for you and for the child, whom you are trying to protect. It is so sad how lots of doctors are completely brainwashed and seldom wake up, and then usually the hard way like Dr Malhotra whose dad died from aheart attack due to the jabs. Hoping for the best for you and your grandchild
..."My position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday"... yes every vaccine ever invented and still being marketed or used. Big pharma always creates the idea that they cannot use placebo groups because that denies "life saving" vaccines to subjects in those groups. What a freaking con.
What needs to happen but never will is that the 1986 vaccine laws need to be destroyed. Then we will see the truth since at that point, as big pharma claims, no vaccines will be injuring children. That would be the proof but we know the opposite will occur.
Aaron Siri says, "I haven't seen the Covid vaccine rushed."
Dr. Dolores Cahill, Immunologist, Phd (former professor at Trinity College, Dublin) has stated that for decades none of these (mRNA) vaccines were ever approved because of death and illness of the animals in studies.
Miss Sasha, beware of The High Wire, RFK Jr...etc etc. Frauds! They want SAFE vaccines which is not possible.
ps--if y'all paint Western themed pieces or American Indian paintings I'd be interested in aquiring--I am an American Indian, Kahane'wake---(Mohawk Tribe of the Iroquois Nation). My Daddy was born on an Indian Reservation in Quebec (Canada). Called First Nations Reserve up there. My Great Grandaddy was Jean Baptiste' Rice-(John the Baptist)-the first man to navigate The Saint Lawrence River (before it became Seaway). "Big John"--I was named after him.
So NOW …according to all the posted comments here…we have no presidential candidates we can trust. The reaction is to boycott voting. Well, that’s NOTsmart or productive.
LETS COME WITH RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS/ ACTIONS alongside our concerns. Otherwise none of this is helpful..
Fairly simple answer (but it'll take many of us)--Easy to do:
"We no longer recognize your authority".
Reasons are many. Here's a reminder of ONE!---"You attempted to Genocide the entire population with a Death Jab."---and so on, and so on. Y'all don't need of complicated list of grievances--One will do.
That's where it needs to be.----Now! No further discussion or debate is required.
Mr Siri, like most persons in positions of "authority" has just proven his mental incompetence. His argument is contradictory regress argument, and his ethical stance is below that of a cock-a-roach.
I think he is thinking like a lawyer and trying to make a case against other vaccines. If a "safe, well-tested" vaccine like COVID has this many problems, then it will be obvious that they all poison.
Fair enough but I think it could backfire because there is a bigger camp of people who will take the statement at face value and use it against him. Sasha has pointed out the gaping ethical issues in his statements, and those statements could be seized upon to bypass those ethical issues to cause even more harm. It seems like a dangerous game to play.
"My position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths associated with them, and due to no evidence that vaccines prevent anything. At a minimum, the right to refuse injections of anything, regardless whether it is good or bad for you should be universally upheld and protected. Every parent should be educated to stop poisoning their children. The government officials should be prosecuted for lying to the public."
Any Presidential candidate should be saying exactly this, harping on these points like a rabid dog. These issues are far more important than the risk of nuclear warfare. The preservation of the health of children is beyond existential in importance. The people who fail to see this are less aware of immediate reality than a drunkard. I'm just sayin'!
Why vote for any candidate that does not stop the covid vaccine? If you vote for either candidate you get more of the same- murder of the US population, children included. Does no one think or see the reality of this situation - voting endorses a leader who allows us to be murdered by the DoD and HHS. Nothing changes.
I doubt there is even a purpose for voting period. The candidates all lie and then do what they want when they get power.
The people who control the world dont care who the people choose to rule over them, only that they choose to be ruled.
I think what you are saying is true. At the same time we have to keep in mind the reality that during and after World War II when you ask the populations of the Eastern European countries, what was worse, rule under Hitler or rule under Stalin and their response is the worst situation was when no one was in charge. The reason for that response is that there is a criminal element in every society which takes over when no one is in charge. At the time a crime is being committed if there is not a good person with a gun, then the bad person with a gun wins. A crime is often committed in minutes. By the time the police arrive, if you are lucky minutes later, they are there to take notes.
That's kinda the point. We are expected to make a choice that is little different than choosing between Hilter and Stalin. And were Hilter and Stalin the choices today, people would be at each others' throats over which is better. Tyranny is tyranny, the specific flavor matters not. Decades upon decades of choosing lesser of two evils got us here. Continuing that insanity is not going to make it better. And continuing to support the very system that wants us dead by participating in their sham (s)election rituals will only continue our misery. You can't vote criminals out of a system that is run solely by criminals. Changing the head of an organized crime family does nothing but allow the organized crime family to carry on.
Of two evils, choose neither.
- Charles Spurgeon
I'm voting for RFK, Jr. and I hope many others do also. Then we can at least send a clear signal that enough of us reject the 2 choices. The criminals will be too busy rigging the election between the 2 hopefully they will let the RFK, Jr. ballots stand
That's because unless a person is a vetted deep state puppet, they don't get to become a political "candidate" in the first place.
Wrong. The system of democracy only attracts and rewards the most evil and the most corrupt.
https://ia801508.us.archive.org/14/items/911-material/Pdfs/Democracy%20The%20God%20That%20Failed.pdf
Communism and dictatorships only attract angels and choirboys:).
So according to your dichotomous logic, if one condemns trump for his warp speed toxin and his continued efforts to promote it after the 2020 election that must make one a biden supporter. Show me a dictator or a communist country who finances and arms the genocidal entity called israel... or STFU!
Exactly my conclusion. Having been raised and properly brainwashed in a socialist country (Chinada) it was a long road but an important journey to realize the essential and inevitable corruption of any government.
Voting is a scam.
https://ia801508.us.archive.org/14/items/911-material/Pdfs/Democracy%20The%20God%20That%20Failed.pdf
They all do what they’re told.
Well... Kinda... But opinions do not run the world. Finance runs the world. >>> https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/DOS-Org-Chart-May-2021_Accessible.pdf
Lies are simply the effective tools of propaganda.
Each of us has eyes to read, ears to listen, and a brain to think and make our own judgement.
"The opposition" is not going to use the same "Vaccine" trick. They have lots of deadly games up their sleeves.
Judging from my personal experience, people use their eyes, ears and brain very selectively, filtering out any information, causing pain, distress or discomfort.
Also, as Sasha correctly pointed out recently, most people have an attention span of a goldfish. Thus, anybody willing to fool people, needs to tell them whatever they want to hear. Telling the Truth is a very honorable thing to do, but one should be prepared to be stoned to death by the very same people you are trying to save. The deep state knows it better than anybody else.
Unfortunately, you are absolutely right! That is why the same game is being played on us over and over again.
Q: Why are people so oblivious to the truth being hidden in plain sight?
A: Because the truth hurts, and a lie comforts.
I think with RFK, Jr. you will get a right to refuse that is robust.
“I don't think that we ought to be mandating medical interventions for UNWILLING Americans UNLESS we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping people rather than hurting them.”
https://rumble.com/v2samua-robert-f.-kennedy-jr.-summarizes-his-views-on-childhood-vaccines-in-3-minut.html
-----
That's a big fucking caveat.
*UNLESS
---
Of course it won't matter because people like Heroes and will gleefully march off the cliff for this placebo and will jump through hooops to justify and explain.
I've watched Mr Kennedy's presentation, and he makes a number of valid statements. However; I completely disagree with the entire notion of "testing" poisons on living subjects, whether human or animal.
Man has been THE butcher of life for thousands of years. When life is butchered for profit rather than sustenance, it is a violation of the essential essence. A mortal sin...
The whole pharmaceutical industry is based on testing potential poisons on living subjects. Apparently most people are good with that.
I don’t think most people even have a clue about the testing, or give it a first thought, much less a second.
RFK is a shill.
https://gamzuletova.substack.com/p/what-is-childrens-health-really-defending
SH is correct. Big caveat! Here is the con:
Re-do vaxx clinical trials (start fresh to ignore all those pesky existing side effects data) by the same people who have lied for a century (because we Trust The Science and Big Pharma to ethically conduct research with transparency. ) Then the new and better research will show vaccines are safe and effective, BUT!! they can Build Back Better (if you prefer that slogan) with the shiney new mRNA technology. so Warp Speed Ahead (if you prefer that slogan) to get all vaccines transitioned to mRNA. Safe and Effective. Stamped with the seal: Proven By Science. Now NO ONE can refuse.
The trajectory is maintained though.
Genocide is a distraction from the biodigital convergence and the social carbon slave state blockchained
https://youtu.be/Ekpzkap31Yk
👆
RFK is a virus shiller.
“Right to refuse that is robust” from RFKjr. Really. I already have that right it’s called informed consent.
I do not need a “leader” to confer rights the constitution did that. The government is perepetrating mass murder on the populous and you think RFKjr will change that - you are wrong - the plan is more of the same - RFKjr never mentions repealing the constitutional
Laws that enable mass murder by the DoD and HHS - why is that? Ask yourself that.
Sonny and Karla may be right. But I have an election coming, and I'm going to gather some people together who at least know which rights we would like to regain. RFK, Jr. has had Sasha on his podcast, and knows what laws need to be removed to restore the freedoms that our constitution has supposedly guaranteed. He has told me in person of his plans to get this done. I'm working with others who feel as we all do that our rights have been trampled. If we elect him and if he wins and he proves you right, so be it. I will still have gathered people about me to continue the battle.
Democracy is an illusion.
https://ia801508.us.archive.org/14/items/911-material/Pdfs/Democracy%20The%20God%20That%20Failed.pdf
The constitution did not, does not “confer” rights to us. It merely names/acknowledges our preexisting, natural, self-evident, God-given rights. The rights we have as our birthright.
Aldo, RFK is pushing the same Barrow of blockchain- emphasis on the chain - and his so called running mate is a telling reveal.
https://youtu.be/Ekpzkap31Yk
Check out https://gamzuletova.substack.com/p/what-is-childrens-health-really-defending
He is the Synthesis of the dialectic at play.
Thesis Antithesis Synthesis
Problem Reaction Solution
The world is a stage, and politics is Hollywood for ugly people.
Choosing the facilitators of your type of slavery seems to.be the acceptable outcome for most truthers these days. People are just too enamoured by the pantomime and have no idea of the false dichotomy of left and right, let alone the hegalian dialectic
See response to Karla
Make sure to watch and share The Jones Plantation with people that still think voting makes a difference.
The most dangerous Superstition 🎯
RFK jr is an establishment shill, just another puppet, another side of the same coin, to keep the populous divided.
If not done so yet, please read https://ia801508.us.archive.org/14/items/911-material/Pdfs/Democracy%20The%20God%20That%20Failed.pdf, or at least listen to the short book https://odysee.com/@NotSure1984:1/Anatomy-of-the-State---Full-Audiobook:d.
We are threatened by annihilation on every front- nuclear war should also be an issue in any debate- nuclear war is an option worse than covid vaccine but they are both means of destroying the world as we have known it. Where is the protest as we face elections mination every day has everyone just tuned out.
The scamdemic has already killed way more than nuclear bombs, and it is just starting
Think long term: if nuclear war does not happen, but the children of today are poisoned and become ill for the rest of their lives, then there won't be armies in the future.
Why should we need armies? AI will fulfill that role. Military is already poisoning the troops via covid vaccine which has an impact on fertility of female troops. Long term thinking - why would any woman or man - mother and father want to have a child that grows up to be fodder for the fatherland or is that the one world government we are threatened with. Armies will be a thing of the past if we can survive too have a past.
I feel you are demoralized and propagandized. But think about this: ai is a word that means love in Japanese.
Therefore, computers love you.
They love you so much they won't let you get hurt and they will pamper you until you die.
Automated love will achieve zero STDs and is more sustainable than human love.
A laugh can dispel any propaganda.
Similarly, In 1969, we were taught by a native Chinese Mandarin speaker at the Defense Language Institute West Coast Branch, that "wǒ ài nǐ" is a phrase for “I love you”. The middle word in the phrase is "love". (-:
That is funny.
There won’t be armies in the future…..my dear think, think again yet think again, they will make us soldiers full metal jacket, fully vaccinated if not by a needle, then by screens, sound, magnetic waves, neuro linguistics, psychotropics….political Olympics and oh yes it’s all in the mind, the perfect psychodrama we have ourselves killed by AI the ultimate delusion.
Have you ever thought of questioning propaganda?
Whole my life and I suspect the mind, yes I’m included…the mind, individual, collective, unconscious, neuro linguistic, super conscious the spiritual and religious mind as a whole to be the result of propaganda, nothing more the same stuff dreams are made of
I agree! Thank you!
Here is a famous quote by the well known Hindu Guru Sri Vodkarama Bramabourbon: "Be the world you want to see in the change."
Voting is just as big a scam as virology. If it would make a difference, it would be illegal. This is why from a very young age you're taught to "vote harder, goy!".
https://ia801508.us.archive.org/14/items/911-material/Pdfs/Democracy%20The%20God%20That%20Failed.pdf
Aware there are more than 2 viable candidates?
Yep! 😑
I think ScKamala is a day drinker, which used to be fashionable among the liar lawyer liars
Please be informed about the clear danger of Kamala.
https://rumble.com/v59dpod-kamala-harris-history.html
Great link
Is she? That's funny, I don't remember ever making that mental association. I never thought much of that woman, and she just looked too dumb even for a politician. Alcoholism might explain it.
…Funny. NOT funny.
I mean, if she's an alcoholic she obviously needs support and the last thing she needs now is to lose her job. Everyone should vote for her so that she feels safe and accepted and she can face her inner demons.
No one should ever criticize her again, lest her condition worsens.
It's so selfish that people want a POTUS that is sane and healthy and reliable and smart. But now is not the time for selfishness. It's time to be selfless and put another drug addict in the White House. Yeah, selflessness and solidarity will stop the wars in the world.
Ain't all that funny?
Please be informed about m the clear danger of Kamala.
https://rumble.com/v59dpod-kamala-harris-history.html
O think what might explain her weird neck .
Barb wire neck, ScKamala does funny neck things when she speaks.
She has taken to hiding her neck, so no one can see it .
How did it get that way?
I am sure many have noticed because she has taken to wearing that white thing to hide it
she is given many speeches very high on something. glassy eyes and slurring words. a clear indication she is an addict
I used to be one and I think you are correct
Perhaps mothers and sperm donors of the last five decades should have considered the "immediate reality" of creating an eighty year life span, rather than the immediate gratification of alleged reality... Not a comment most would agree with, but there it is...
They say that instant gratification becomes chronic karma debt.
Or, said more Europeanly, there is health and wealth in low time preference attitude.
“Now let me state very clearly that the mission of the Informed Consent Action Network my mission, The Highwire, Aaron's mission, in all the work that we do is to end mandates forever. I don't believe that any medical intervention should ever be mandated upon you. And we are working to get to that final end.
It starts by waking up the hearts and minds of the people, which is what The Highwire does every single week. But ultimately, you have to deal with legislators, and you have to deal with government, because as long as they're bringing it, for those of you that tried to get on a plane during COVID and weren't allowed to without proof of vaccination, for those of you trying to go to work but lost your job because you refused to, because you didn't have a vaccination and could not show proof of it, those mandates were real. And so unlike this person that's talking, I actually care about you too.
Just because some of us have opted out, just because I have a job where I can say, hey man, stay in your ground, I get it. I work at The Highwire. I'm[…]”
From The Highwire with Del Bigtree: THE SCIENCE OF STRATEGY: ICAN LEGISLATE’S VACCINE CONFIDENCE BILL DEMYSTIFIED, Jun 19, 2024
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree/id1227863378?i=1000659534298
This material may be protected by copyright.
Expecting a Presidential candidate to say anything to the benefit of the people would be merely for keeping the hoards dumb down. Presidents do more things that are alike than not!
Government is just a violent organization that "Traffics' the 'citizens' utilizing enFORCE - ment to make people obey....I mean where is the first place most people have their first encounter with the police? "In Traffic"
"Mankind" works best when life is "Voluntary" not forced!
When enFORCEment is employed by a few against the many without their full knowledge and understanding it just breeds unnatural result after unnatural result until we have a shit hole of a world where the only people not suffering are the 1% of the 1% who own and control the majority of the worlds wealth, resources and influence all governments regardless of political ideology, largely creating the world we all are born into.
How about abolish government?
Ever thought about having that discussion?!
Because NOTHING will change if you allow, promote, sanction, vote for a system of governance. The Psychopathic Parasites will always rise in such a system.
The people who fail to see this are less aware of immediate reality than a drunkard. I'm just sayin'!
Rabies doesn't exist. And please don't insult dogs by comparing subhumans like this with them.
Be careful: the absence of evidence for a virus said to cause an infectious disease does not mean that there is no disease.
It could be that viruses are a misconception: some kind of toxin, or maybe something else, causes some sort of brain damage in a dog, which manifests with certain consistent symptoms. And because we are talking about a dog, its cheaper to kill it than to try to save its life, as we would probably do with a human being.
Then, it's easier to pretend it was a contagious disease, to perhaps cover up the responsibility of someone who, perhaps unintentionally, contaminated a place with some garbage and this caused the poisoning. And because this lie is so credible by most, it's also easy to invent an invisible virus. If they said it was a bacterium, visible under certain conditions, then they would really have to work to keep the cover story alive. But with viruses is far easier to lie and protect industrial interest, or anything else. After all, viruses (and the much smaller "haptens") are very difficult to work with, and to prove anything about them. Maybe, the virus is just cellular debris, packing a more or less consistent type of genetic information, if at all. If it only happens to be at the same place at the same time, then maybe it hasn't caused any disease, but is a consequence of the disease caused by some toxin. This alternative story is not without critique, because if the debris look very much the same across different cases of the same disease, then that seems to be a pattern, not a chaotic crumbling of decaying and ill tissue. If this is correct, maybe there are a few candidate explanations that have not been considered yet, that do not involve the idea of contagious disease. For example, the always controversial 5g.
So. Do dogs have rabies, some times? I don't know. But if you ever see an angry dog, be careful to not get attacked. At least you may get wounds, and these may hurt and get infected and even superinfected, and that would be even more pain for you, and maybe some toxin manages to find the way to the blood, and maybe it goes to some vital organ, and maybe you get something more life threatening than a wound caused by a non-human animal.
Precaution is always worthwhile.
"does not mean that there is no disease": correct, there are symptoms, indeed. But any "disease" is actually a healing process, as the body is trying to recover from whatever was done to it. See https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Dr-Thomas-Cowan-What-Makes-You-Sick-WAPF-Oct-22-2022:6.
"It could be that viruses are a misconception": no, viruses are a big, fat lie.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/viruses-dont-exist-and-why-it-matters/
"more or less consistent type of genetic information"
The whole dna story is based on a dogma. Do you know what the definition of a dogma is? Have a look at https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
"the always controversial 5g"
Yes, 5G and other EMF sources are for sure related to many of the symptoms that people have.
"Do dogs have rabies?": no, rabies virus does not exist.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/what-about-rabies/
My friend, I think you suffer from a bit of a fever. I will help you overcome it and enjoy a gentle stroll above the blissful waters of the sea of Rationality. Careful with the sargassum, you may trip over.
1. Viruses can be both a big, fat lie and a misconception. The first pair of adjectives belongs to the sphere of political activism. The term misconception is somewhat formal, and not very much exciting.
It's a term that a Herr Professor Stefan Lanka would use.
You have to take into account the extreme difficulty of studying living things. Studying inert matter, like a Roselite mineral, is easier: they don't change very fast. And studying dead things is also easier: they don't complain as much as living things.
There is a phenomenon everyone agrees is real: inheritance. Or the simple observation that one living thing produces another living thing that resembles a lot like itself. Quite a remarkable miracle that life is self-organizing and does not need decisive Governmental action and more budget to sustain itself.
How do we, mere ignorant mortals, explain this thing that a pine tree begets pine trees and not vines, and little bacteria beget little bacteria and not giant worms, and elephants beget elephants and not weasels?
To answer that, we have come up with the little theory of genetics. Which may be mostly true, or mostly false, or half-and-half, or completely false. I don't know enough about it.
And here is our viral problem. Biologists study (painstakingly) those Petri dishes and those test tubes and all the weird chemicals and preparations and machines they use. They see dead and decaying tissues. They get genetic material through the controlled demolition of those Vero E6 kidney cells. They analyze the genetic material. They see a pattern. Repeatedly.
If there is a pattern, that material has to have some meaning. They remember the fable of the mean viruses who invade perfectly healthy cells and do terrible things to it, causing disease in tissues (liver, lungs). Those greedy capitalist viruses just can't have enough and keep parasitizing the noble worker proletarians cells and exploit them and take their rights and finally kill them, and everyone is sad in the kibbutz. (Do you see the projection of insane human ideologies on supposedly scientific research yet?)
When the scientist tries to connect the results of the experiments with the current myths that rule science, he says "Aha! Eureka! I found a virus! There is no other explanation! This abundant genetic material caused disease and is a virus! I'm a genius! Where is my Nobel Prize and my hat for orgies with minors? I have to celebrate this new discovery!" That's how it goes. In this sense, and trying not to imply that all virologists are sex criminals and psychopath narcissists (only a minority of them happen to be that), we get the result that viruses are indeed a misconception: the scientists is not interpreting correctly the results of the experiments, because the field is corrupt.
And then the critics go on to explain more details about how this thing is so wrong, trying to not use language that is too insulting to people who may not be evil and may be recovered for the cause of science.
Now enter the activists. Obviously, an activist has to use extreme language. He needs to bring attention to an obscure topic. So, activists say: the virus is a big, fat lie.
But the target audience of the serious critic and the activist is different. The language has to be different.
I think we all understand that.
2. Northern Tracy is a nice Irish lady who loves dogs and cats and hamsters and several other critters. She strongly dislikes the violence exerted on animals in scientific research and in the manufacturing of medicines or what have you. So, she is an activist. But she is also an intellectual critic. She wrote that article where she argues against Genetics. Great article. Also many other good scribblings she has. We all learned a lot by reading it.
But it's just one critic against a gigantic behemoth of industrial and military interest. The acitivists, who are always more used to the passions of the soul than used to rationality, are impatient and make the mistake that one little stone should be enough to kill the beast. Not so!
It seems there has always been criticism about the DNA model, by many thinkers. Basically, everyone knows it's fake, but they go along with it, because there is no way to change it. The system has too much inertia as it runs down the hill in direction to the precipice. Everything sucks.
But it is a very good thing that learned people set aside time to inform the public of the problems that every official truth of the regime has.
Activists should be smart and never eat their own. For example, if a small time lawyer has to argue something crazy and wrong to defend the particular health interest of one client, activists should not attack the small time lawyer for not telling all the truths. Truth may not be aceptable in courts of law. Bummer.
A different issue happens when a big time lawyer tries to engage in political activism to change the law, or when he is preparing a rhetorical minefield for a future big case, with the aim to establish some sort of jurisprudence, that favors the medical freedom movement interests. If he makes bad arguments that are going to fail, it's a good idea to denounce that. That does not count as eating your own. But activists are generally not learned enough to do such a fine job. You need a learned and experienced person to do that job.
Activists are useful, but should know their proper place. If they want more, they have to study more, and reach the level of the activist-intellectual. This has a ton of merit by the way.
3. Please, go read this www.changingminds.org/techniques/general/sequential/pace_lead.htm
This is important to understand why people use the arguments of geneticists against genetics.
The difficult concept of "viral load" which is an application of quantitative PCR not-a-test, was implanted in medical practice using techniques of persuasion, and the critics have been using techniques of persuasion to dismantle such concept.
Nothing is easy about this scientific war.
We need the miracle of Rationality, and learn to tread above water.
I am not your friend, don't use such derogatory terms to belittle me.
"we have come up with the little theory of genetics": actually it's not a theory, it's a dogma, called the central dogma of genetics. So, it has never been proven. So, why would I believe it? The fact that we cannot explain something doesn't mean we have to invent some stupid dogma and have "science" reach "consensus" on that.
"The system has too much inertia": that's only because there are still too many cowardly corrupt brainwashed dumbass fools working for and in the system. There will be a day when "difficult times create strong men again".
"The difficult concept of "viral load"": it's not difficult, as there is no virus, and thus there is no viral load.
Aaand the fever is confirmed.
It wasn't my intention to belittle you as a person, or your argument. What I'm doing is giving you clues to be nicer to people in online conversations or debates. You don't like the clues I offer. That's too bad. But keep reading, please.
When I use the term "little" in "little theory of genetics" I'm using ironic language. The field of genetics is vast. Virology is much smaller.
We are using a different sense of the word theory. To avoid confusion, let me explain my usage of the term, and I will explain how I perceive you are using it as I describe differences, and then maybe you can respond if you agree with the distinction or not.
A theory, in my usage of the term, is not something that is true, or confirmed, or verified. A theory is a coherent set of hypothesis and data and methods, designed to attempt to explain something. Theories may be completely wrong. And wrong theories may be wrong because they carry too many errors, or because they are made up. In this latter sense, a theory is a political weapon, not an attempt at explaining anything. In politics, everything is obscurity and confusion.
I think, maybe I'm wrong, you are using the word theory to refer to scientific truths. To certainty. This is very outmoded, and many other people will ignore that usage, and ignore your comments. But I think this usage has some merit: A good explanation of some real phenomenon should be based on truth.
But we are way past this. Currently, scientists all agree they have no clue about anything and it's better this way (This is a bit of a joke, and a bit of an insult to the pitiful state of epistemology these days.)
As you can see, the confusion is now clear: I was using the term theory in a very broad sense, and you were using it in a narrow sense.
But you also say that genetics is based on the central dogma of genetics, and that is why genetics is false. This is wrong, in my opinion. You are being mislead by your bias against the word dogma. A very common bias, by the way. A dogma is simply a teaching. It can be a correct teaching or a false teaching. Just because something is traditionally taught or passed down does not mean it is false or wrong. In the particular case of the so called "central dogma of genetics" it has been shown to be wrong for about 40 years. Nevertheless, all students learn it, and learn why it's false, and keep using it when it's convenient.
But, as you already know, this dogma is smaller than genetics in general. It's just one important claim, but not the whole deal. The claim can be formulated this way: nuclear DNA is transcribed into mRNA by enzymes, and RNA is translated into proteins in ribosomes, but proteins cannot be translated back into mRNA, and mRNA cannot be transcribed back into DNA. And this dogma was "proven" wrong when they had to invent a method (the enzyme called "reverse transcriptase" or "retrotranscriptase") for RNA viruses to attach themselves permanently to the DNA of a DNA-based organism. This is also wrong, but this invention killed the central dogma of genetics. After that, they the also vast field of genetic engineering went into full swing, and the attempts at developing genetically modified organisms became a big target for research money. Without the limit of the dogma, they could start tinkering around on whiteboards and with computer scripting languages and databases, thus creating a huge business opportunity.
But I claim, and I guess you will agree, that genetics is more than DNA and RNA. We have to talk about aminoacids and bases, for example. Or the relationship of ATP and the supposed double spiral of DNA. Or the fact that not all cells have DNA, and that there is DNA in other places. And maybe both the bases and the aminoacids are chemicals which have been given characteristics and abilities they don't really have. And maybe the bases do not really exist as described. And the bizarre idea (and very dogmatic idea) that all living organisms share this scheme of bases and codons that produce one aminoacid and nothing else, because (Darwinism alert) all currently living organism descend from a hypothetical most recent common ancestor. Of which there is exactly zero empirical evidence. This is inventive reasoning at its best, and everyone should feel appalled by this wild jumping at conclusions.
No one can explain yet how the bases first appeared, how they first attached to each other in that specific way, what inert chemical first produced the bases, or whether first there were the aminoacids and these formed in a yet to be explained way the first protein pattern, which, by pure chance, created a mold somewhere, and this became the first sequence of bases, and all this happened outside cells and nuclei because those came much later, and there is no way to describe the conditions where all this first happened: temperature, pressure, pH, EM radiation, composition of the air, the chemicals present in the water, the amount of light, the type of light. Nothing is known, but student are told that it happened. Isn't all this very weird?
Genetics is a very big science. Or a big chapter of the quest of human inquiry. And many things about it are probably wrong. And I don't have enough knowledge to say for sure what is correct and what is not correct.
It's very tempting to throw everything out. But given the current state of the institutions that rule over us, it's going to take a lot of effort in non-violent communication to persuade people to rethink everything and change course.
Finally, I mention the concept of viral load and I claim it is a difficult concept, because it is a very iffy construct that abuses PCR. It's basically a form of divination. People with "viral" hepatitis are diagnosed with it and later they are told whether the medicines work also using the same method of abusing quantitative PCR. This is, in my opinion, a sad state of affairs, because people see their lives altered by the diagnosis and the treatment of a disease whose origin is probably not viral. In other words, they are secretly being used as part of scientific research. Not cool! Patients should not be beguiled like that.
But we cannot persuade scientists to stop abusing people by abusing them. In some cases, scientists do not even realize the damage they are doing to people.
A more humane treatment of confused people could be useful in this task of dispelling the myths about viral disease.
No one should confuse the need to make noise to bring attention to this corruption of medical science, with the correct way to communicate with scientists.
Sometimes, a little of diplomacy goes a long way. Thugs and bullies give the no-virus camp a bad reputation and make everything more difficult.
Excellent reveal of blatant disregard for human life.
Yes. Blatant disregard has gotten us to where we are today... Mr Siri's idiocy is only an example.
I don't think Siri will be able to understand clinical trials or medical content unless he restudies high school biology, math, and chemistry all the way up to college level.
I suggest we test these vaccines on persons who can give consent, and that we choose from a pool of people pushing these vaccines; doctors, politicians, MSM reporters, FDA employees and other puppets.
Exactly! 😑 let's see if the turd-weasels consent. 😆
Yeah, I like that! Include police and military personnel - oh wait, the latter are already guinea pigs.
Aaron Siri has proven himself to be a legal genius in all of the cases that he has won for Ican. I don’t think you can win these cases without a cunning understanding of how to play the system. I suspect he’s playing a long game here. His firm is responsible for our knowledge that the FDA wanted to block the release of documents for 75 years. He has also one other significant battles,. I can’t think of another legal firm that has made more progress in exposing the horrific corruption in the Covid 19 “vaccine” debacle.
He as not as genius as you paint him to be. He is a competent attorney and done a good work in the past. What he is proposing here is an atrocity, lack of ethics and endangers our kids, so we need to discuss it. Bad ideas need to be discussed and dismissed, that's how we arrive at the truth.
Sasha, don't take things out of context. Just the 4 minutes don't paint the whole picture. When Aaron says that the covid 'vaccines' had a rigorous testing, which was obvious a sarcastic comment, it was in comparison with other vaccines that had a monitoring time of 3 or 5 DAYS! A 2 month monitoring for the covid injections in comparison could be called 'rigorous'. We all understand that keeping the results secret for 55/75 year was a warning to not trust this testing.
The 4 minutes is a complete set 2 questions and 2 answers. He never clarified his statements, despite numerous attempts by me and others. Secondly, the legal complaint demanding that HepB vaccine tested on infants and children by Siri and Gilmstad is complete, too. I read it. It leaves no room for imagination.
Super disappointed in Siri. Exactly how much aluminum does he propose to inject in infants?
Disappointed? I can't believe you fell for a guy with such name, looking like that in the first place.
Of course, since your position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths associated with them, and due to no evidence that vaccines prevent anything is the only right position, and I appreciate that. But where do you think you get into court with that position? I don't think anywhere, and also Aaron knows that gets you nowhere. I am still of the opinion that it was a sarcastic comment of Aaron. He knows exactly what is wrong with 'vaccines' and bioweapons.
yes, you can get into court with the position that 1)vaccines have caused documented harms for centuries, and the data are well compiled; 2) the FDA DOES NOT regulate vaccines as medicine and fully condones toxic materials, adulteration and contamination (Katherine Watt has compiled a mountain of legal research on this matter, it is black and white in law); 3)forcing knowingly harmful substances is a violation of many provisions in law and US Constitution. There are many ways to get in court. What is presented in Siri's petition is a lawsuit-to-nowhere, a publicity stunt for funding and press coverage, and an incompetent unethical show.
The problem is that none of the people that you need to confess the harms, are willing to do that. See what happens here in Alberta, Canada.
The president of the section of pediatrics for the Alberta Medical Association finds the claims "saddening" fringe views, informed by hearsay and innuendo.
Sam Wong said he has not read anything in official pediatrics or medical literature that supports views that mRNA vaccines are untested or dangerous for children.
"I can't see any drawbacks to the use of the mRNA vaccination in children or adults," Wong said.
"The broad view of pediatricians across Canada, of the infectious diseases group, is that the mRNA vaccinations are safe and effective."
I think these people are evil.
Our Premier for a year now, also knew exactly what was going on.
Smith herself declined to get the widely available Pfizer or Moderna inoculations, choosing instead to fly to Arizona to get a non-mRNA vaccine that wasn't available at the time in Canada.
cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/ucp-speakers-covid-vaccines-injection-1.7200703#:
LOL, yeah, courts will help us... May I suggest you listen to https://odysee.com/@NotSure1984:1/Anatomy-of-the-State---Full-Audiobook:d and read https://ia801508.us.archive.org/14/items/911-material/Pdfs/Democracy%20The%20God%20That%20Failed.pdf.
Courts are part of the system, and the system was built to work against you, not for you.
That’s what I thought as I watched a big portion of the exchange. Sarcsasm was his tone.
"all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths" - that's the wrong reasoning. The fundamental reason is: viruses don't exist.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/viruses-dont-exist-and-why-it-matters/
I’m going to listen to full. Why would anyone be sarcastic or flippant in testimony? That’s not funny or smart.
Perhaps if he were to say something like :
‘One might say they had C19 shots had “rigorous“ testing if compared to the absurdity of testing five days for the Hep B vaccine…
Outright sarcasm is just confusing.
please listen to the whole thing. He was serious when he said "robust", he meant it.
Thank you!🙏🏽
Hi Sasha,
I need to read your post here before commenting any further. I won't have time for that until this evening. I merely listened to the 4-minute clip you posted and had to make an immediate comment. <g>
I would agree with you regarding all of the cases he has won for ICAN and for CHD. But, his testimony in the above 4-minute clip was abhorrent. If he's that scientifically ignorant, he needs to be schooled by someone who does understand.
Is he a parent? But it is probably a way to trap the rats. We need to get involved more. The idea that any Govt. agency can mandate access to my body or my children or countrymen or world population is absolutely abhorrent and unacceptable.
Fauci got around that by doing his testing on orphans. Look it up in rfk book on fauci as well as other places.
As I remember my research into Fauci’s unpaid-for crimes, he would go to poor families in New York?, diagnose their child with HIV and strap them down in a hospital bed for a lab rat, using the drugs that produced the same symptoms as this mysterious sudden AIDS. The parents were bullied, threatened with child removal if they didn’t let Fauci be in charge. That is pure Murder. There is a big death plot with the children that were used as Guinea pigs.
This example is why no “Medical Doctor or Health Official can ever subvert parental rights, or human rights. Besides many that are incompetent, sadistic, clueless, maybe demented, sold out to Pharma or have forgotten their Med School lessons, which are also full of baseless science and holes, wearing a white coat is not a badge of authority,
Yes, look up Peter Duesberg "Inventing the AIDs virus", out of print but try inter-library loan-that's what I had to do. Celia Farber, "Serious Adverse Events", Jon Rappoport "AIDs Inc". These and others cover all the tricks they had for promulgating the AIDs con and preying on poor people. There is a special spot in hell for Fauci, and not just for what he did to dogs.
I think it would be rude, convenient or lazy to shove the heavy lifting onto God. Living with this level of criminality is inflammatory at spiritual depths.
I disagree. He completely misses the root of the problem. "Vaccines", all vaccines, are deadly, both short and long term. He needs to read the legal work laid out by Katherine Watt at Bailiwicks News and get familiar with Sasha's analysis. Peace.
This times 1,000 ^^
VACCINES ARE THE BIGGEST MEDICAL FRAUD IN THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE....THESE VACCINE PUSHERS SHOULD BE PUT IN JAIL.
AUTISM IS A DIRECT RESULT OF A VACCINE AND THEY STILL PUSH THIS...ITS A HUNDRED BILLION $$$$ PROGRAM
Keep a cool head
It’s upsetting but keep a level head l
Good Lord! EVERYONE knows that this experimental therapy received the most cursory studies before being inflicting it upon the public. These Kabuki hearings are just designed to sow doubt and to delay the inevitable. IMHO crimes were committed, numerous people have died AND justice must be served. Pax
Justice delayed
is
justice denied
Game. Set. Match
Welcome to the Criminal Olympics
Posted to Aaron Siri's Contact page at https://www.sirillp.com/contact-us/. I'll let you know if I hear anything...
____________________
Dear Siri and Glimstad,
I've been following the work of Aaron Siri, Del Bigtree, Sasha Latypova, Jeffery Jaxen and many others for years. All have important voices in the medical freedom movement.
Mr. Siri, have you read the following article by Sasha Latypova arguing against your legal positions with respect to FDA and vaccine trials?
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/aaron-siri-testifies-that-mrna-vaccines?r=14nzxn&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
She makes some good points, especially those quoted below. Please consider responding to Latypova's article.
"My position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday due to well documented adverse events and deaths associated with them, and due to no evidence that vaccines prevent anything. At a minimum, the right to refuse injections of anything, regardless whether it is good or bad for you should be universally upheld and protected. Every parent should be educated to stop poisoning their children. The government officials should be prosecuted for lying to the public.
Finally, vaccine manufacturing is not regulated by the FDA at all! They only present a false-front to fool the parents and the healthcare providers that it is a regulated product class.
There is no enforcement of manufacturing quality or safety in relation to these substances": https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/on-unavoidable-adverse-side-effects?r=14nzxn&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Latypova states that "Katherine’s analysis is a much better basis for a legal complaint v FDA. Siri and Gilmstad would be well served evaluating this material and amending their ill-conceived strategy."
Thank you very much for considering the above information.
I also used that contact form earlier today to send the following recommendation to Attorney Siri:
-----
Hello,
Attorney Aaron Siri's June 27th testimony to the New Hampshire House Committee on COVID Response Efficacy was appalling. In part, Attorney Siri really has no idea how toxic the lipid nanoparticle envelope is. He should not be testifying about the scientific aspects of "vaccines".
Please advise Attorney Siri that he should view the following Dr. David E. Martin and Dr. Judy A. Mikovits presentation to Attorneys Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Rocco Galati regarding Covid-19 injection products:
Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device. (duration - 9:16)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ApnVWjiDdPeD
Sincerely,
Ed Paré
Edmond B. Paré, PhD (human anatomical sciences), MST
Wells, Maine
I am stunned. IMO Siri does not understand the inadequacy of the testing methodologies themselves.
Thanks. I was sitting here wondering why many others appeared to be missing facts such as the one you state. I am also stunned. I never dreamed Aaron Siri is so clueless scientifically. Perhaps many people do not realize the breadth and depth of scientific training we go through to understand the science. Siri didn't even appear to have a basic grasp of the toxicity of the lipid nanoparticle envelope. He should start by listening to the following David Martin, Judy Mikovits explanation to RFK, Jr and Rocco Galati:
Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device. (duration: 9:16)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ApnVWjiDdPeD
All these cats run in the same group. They know each other well & get together at their events often. They break bread together bro. I suspect Aaron Siri gets funding from Bigtree who gets it from Abbey Rockefeller & other seedy characters. They were all out at her ranch, enjoying lunch & conversation, along with Malone & others. Very suspect. Bigtree was overheard at a local private event last year saying “We are very well funded”. Just sayin.
Why would a Rockefeller want to fund The Highwire and the VAXXED series of documentaries? Bigtree has convincingly proven in a Highwire episode that absolutely none of the "vaccines" on the Childhood Immunization Schedule have been proven to be "safe and effective". The WHO has blatantly lied regarding "safe and effective".
Isn't it the same logic as the CIA. Supports the both sides and causes more disruptions.
And, perhaps anyone accepting the money will at least temper their actions, with the thought of keeping the money coming? Plus, the money giver may gain an idea of the direction it's fund recipients may be heading?
Before the Cvd, the highwire was a fringe media outlet. Bigtree was criticised heavily. I don't know when they began receiving the Rockefeller money but when someone is struggling with finance it would be the best opportunity to interfere.
Money is money. They can work both sides. Not sayin they aren’t doing good things, but just very sus that they openly discussed being at Abbey’s ranch & breaking bread with her & Malone & others. Then, at same private event, was overheard saying they’re “very well funded”. I don’t pretend to know it all. No one has all the answers. But this, to me, is suspect. Following the money trails tells you alot. Whitney Webb is excellent at this. Knowing the connections is important. If they’re only for the good of the people, I am glad. Sometimes the money trails can tell you all you need to know. I would like to know if they’re getting any funds from a Rockefeller.
Yes. I would also like to know that. (-:
LOL so the highwire is like Wikipedia. Pretending to be short of cash, constantly asking for donations (which floods my email box :-( )
Whilst they are well funded.
I agree Edmond. And Sasha said she thinks Siri has done good work in some cases bug just diagrees with his approach here...
Yes. I need to read her entire post here later today.
Thanks for your comment. I was thinking the testing is like the vaccines. When they fail the. response is to do more. When the testing fails to predict problems, do more of the same testing.
Dr. Hazan determined that the COVID shots wipe out the bifidobacteria. Millenials who were already immune compromised by childhood vaccines died within days of their mandated shots. Not all died … merely tens of thousands, depending on their history and the vial contents…sloppy DOD manufacturing. A complicated convolution, like a pinball hitting the right combination of bumpers to end up in the “death” bin. The Silent Vietnam War.
Because the important effects of the shots on trial participants were subclinical and long term … no attention to compromise of the gut flora … the effect on individuals that differ in critical detail from the trial participants was not predictable: the fundamental understanding was missing. So, testing is not “robust” if you don’t know what to look for. I postulate this is true for all the vaccines. Ten-year-olds who did not show chicken pox rash but get shingles from the vaccine virus … it was not sterilized by immune response but instead hosted in the gut only to show up later.
Sloppy DOD manufacturing may well be intentional, given the depopulation agenda.
I am very interested in the number of pregnant women in the Covid-19 trials who were excluded from the trials, with no explanation recorded in the documents.. There were a well over a hundred, weren't there? These are the documents that they wanted held back for 75 years. I've wondered why there couldn't be a lawsuit to uncover that information, given that the CDC is still recommending jabbing pregnant women.
I don't think Siri will be able to understand clinical trials or medical content unless he restudies high school biology, math, and chemistry all the way up to college level.
"...no vaccine is actually 100% safe or effective for everyone"-CDC.
Actually they are all poison. https://www.bitchute.com/video/57MAAwfR6FmL
The CDC was drunk that day.
You hit the nail on the head with this. I could remove the people and the issue (vaccines) and swap it out for 'gender transition' and the same thing is happening. They need more studies they tell the public, big ones with lots of deceived children and their duped parents to create large fudged datasets to continue to build their industry. The only people in industry that would participate are morally bankrupt. The industry needs to be shut down.
100%
What do you mean MORE studies? This implies that some safety studies have been performed. Aaron Siri is winning cases by making the bureaucrats and government officials admit that there are actually ZERO safety studies done for any vaccine. Watch the trials. Listen to the audio as he backs these people into tiny little corners. He is brilliant. Watch the Highwire, they’re the only ones getting this shit right.
Good question. So why is Aaron demanding MORE STUDIES in his lawsuit?
more studies = more fuel for lawsuits by siri & glimstad (even if those lawsuits are well intentioned)
so a few innocent babies get killed along the way? gotta have that rigorous science. after all, as del bigtree's mantra goes, "where there is risk there must be choice."
speaking of which - peggy hall has taken a deep dive on bigtree and ICAN's recent commitment to actually promoting vaccines ?!?https://www.bitchute.com/video/OVMOFiqhDIri/
Imagine for a moment that all vaccines are pulled from the market and overnight the American public recognizes all vaccines for what they are- poisons forcibly applied to children via government diktats for the benefit of Pharma financial cartels aka racketeering.
What would this do to the business model of the Highwire and CHD? They too would implode overnight.
If you want to work for either of these organizations you will go along with this or you will be pushed out. Both of these outfits pimp the lab leak BS to the hilt also. Cashing on the mythology and fear.
Both outfits and their head honcho's like to play the "thin line" of appearing to be radical in their positions while in reality they are tepid reformists which is at best a losing strategy not to mention flat out dishonest.
Neither Bigtree or Kennedy are opposed to vaccines. This fact comes as a surprise when you tell their fans this and when you quote them directly to support this position most people are shocked that they didn't know this.
Safely tested poisons distributed in smaller doses. That's where these people are at. And frankly Pharma should agree to this as they can reinvent their business model (they are trying to do so with mRNA poisons) and extend this racketeering operation out another hundred years.
good point. By the way, if all vaccines are removed and all the "pandemic laws" overturned, I will shut down this stack and continue with my art-only stack. That would be dream come true...
As long as the Amish refuse all vaccines and don't get the diseases that those vaccines are suppose to prevent, I am sure I can do without any vaccines too.
A 2017 study on the Amish conducted by Northwestern University in the US and Tohoku University in Japan found that compared to the general population of the US, the Amish have 1) a 10-year longer life expectancy and 2) a lower incidence of diabetes. https://www.planet-today.com/2024/03/amish-officially-declared-worlds.html?m=1
They do get allergies and do get sick (including cancer)
Our Amish friends have shifted their farms to all organic after discovering so much illness of the English world.
That would be a celebration day, for sure! Peace.
I think there might be an unpleasant transition period during which the adults who received childhood vaccines rather than actually contracting the illnesses will get them as cases increase. Some of those diseases are much harder on adults. I think part of the myth of lifelong immunity from childhood vaccines has been bolstered by the lifetime immunity obtained from contracting the disease. When these shots were first given most of the population had actual immunity. Now those people are dying and you will be left with a majority population that have less robust to virtually no immunity because those shots are not nearly as effective as they claim. It is evident in the mumps vaccine with increasing cases in the vaccinated. The pertussis vaccine has lost effectiveness and their answer seems to be more doses of something that doesn’t work. They are in real pickle with polio also. I think their answers in court under oath are revelatory and different than their pr campaigns to encourage public compliance. Besides the loss of revenue, if too many parents opt out the lies and incompetence of those in authority will become apparent and that must be prevented at all costs. Besides epidemics in the vaccinated what if there is a decline in autism and chronic disease in children? If I am wrong in my thinking let me know, l am just an observer not a professional
You bring up some good points.
It's not that vaccines have LOST effectiveness. They were NEVER EFFECTIVE in the first place. Vaccines are effective only in causing harm - causing immune, digestive, and nervous system dysfunction. Vaccines are one of the major causes of disease conditions.
There is a generational component to health and lack of health. I've read that toxins go down at least four generations. In other words, if my great grandmother was exposed to toxins, it may affect me. All female children may be more affected because each woman carries her potential offspring from her own birth. Or, maybe that doesn't matter.
I believe each vaxxed generation is weaker/sicklier than the less vaxxed generation before it. To this, figure in breast-fed or formula-fed... Breast-fed from a healthy mom contrasted with two or three generations of infants fed synthetic milk formula with synthetic vitamins and incorrect fat content. Add to that poor food in both moms and children.
It has been known for over fifty years that breast fed babies were less damaged from vaccines than formula-fed babies. Breast milk creates a healthier microbiome and somewhat neutralizes some toxins
People need to get past the idea there are viruses called measles, polio, chicken pox, HIV etc. that cause symptoms like fever, rashes, and even worse conditions such as paralysis. Severe conditions are usually caused by toxins and poisons such as pesticides and herbicides and metals. The symptoms we name as diseases are the body cleansing through rashes, coughing, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, etc. Our bodies are throwing off what doesn't belong.
IMO we all might want to learn some basics (and then some) about how to make our bodies healthy. We need to not freak out if we get a fever or a rash. We need to be more discerning about when we take antibiotics or other medicines. We need to question the medical narratives. We need to not ask the doctors....
Just my opinion.
from personal observation, i agree that people are generally becoming less hardy. all the environmental and medical insults are taking their toll generationally. this is harder for younger people to see because they know nothing else and people tend to normalize the familiar. there are vaccines that reduce the number of cases of certain diseases-measles, rubella, chicken pox, but the down steam effects can be undesirable-side effects, not providing lifetime protection, in the case of varicella trading chicken pox incidence for increases in shingles, a more serious disease. i believe for a long time the cdc tried to deny this, i remember reading a paper by one of their minions saying it wasnt happening and he was at a loss as how there could be any experiment or conclusions made. then a british dr in a bmj rapid response came up with something immediately, which lead me to believe the first guy was just and apologist for the cdc wishful thinking and dishonesty, at any rate, before the varicella vax, shingles was more prevalent in married couples with no children than in married couples with children, afterwards that difference went away. it is of interest that the covid shots triggered shingles revealing that they undermine immune function. i think luck, terrain, and genetics all make for differences in health but also think there are bacterial and viral illnesses and that sometimes you can do everything right and still contract them
I think you are unfair. Kennedy’s campaign position is to end the chronic disease epidemic … as if he does not already know what the causes are, vaccines a big component of the global poisoning.
If you read his books and listen to his interviews this is abundantly clear.
Most people at CHD brought professional skills from elsewhere, no one is afraid of going back to it with health freedom accomplished. Why do you imagine everyone is so mercenary? Does this reflect your own outlook? They are all fighting for you and you are putting them down.
Kennedy talks about more “studies” where needed because the courts require them. Everything he does and says has been mercilessly censored by MSM. A public addicted to vaccines has to be educated. He’s saying “we will prove it to you.” He is not picking a fight. He says we want “safe vaccines,” a statement no one can disagree with. …at the same time knowing the vaccines are inherently unsafe by the manufacturer’s own admission. All vaccines attack the human microbiome. As such they cannot benefit health. The public does not know this because researchers like Dr. Hazan cannot get published. Listen to her presentation to Sen Johnson’s hearing. Moreover current safety studies are way inadequate, but currently accepted by the courts. This has to change.
When citizens have the definitive information that holds to the flame the feet of legislators , health boards and judges … they will. Doctors have already damaged their credibility beyond repair. But the fight for free press and scientific literature lies ahead.
No, I'm not being unfair at all. I happen to know these people quite well. The problem is that you are "a fan" and are dealing in emotion. Your aspersions and numerous fallacies in your comment Illustrate how deeply in denial you are. I've read RFK's books (for analysis) and have seen Hazan speak numerous times (she has nothing to offer anyone and knows not of what she is saying). BTW RFK has openly and often bragged about the fact that all his children are vaccinated. He also believes and pushes the lie that there was a pandemic
The CHD people aren't "fighting for me" (laughs) they are in fact one of the biggest impediments for people understanding the entirety of the Covid Operation and openly and often refused to openly debate people on multiple issues. The one time RFK did do so was when he had D Rancourt on his podcast and Rancourt made him look like a fool.
Shall I go into great detail? Likely it wouldn't matter an iota as you have established your basis for evaluating a situation on the words narrated by your “hero” or someone you automatically defer to -you uncritically accept these words as truths regardless of the substance of the claims- you are operating on a level of superficial emotional reaction.
You will no longer be capable of perceiving concepts or evaluating ideas as you have outsourced your critical thinking skills to this cult-like leader.
We see this phenomenon in the "Covid dissent movement" where so-called alt-health leaders perpetuate various quack theories and their fans or followers accept these hypotheses simply based on the fact that their "hero" made a claim- no concrete evidence needed.
The followers of RFK Jr. are the worst of the batch.
Gibberish.
Not that anything can shake the faith of a 'true believer' but many of us have been in opposition to all vaccines unconditionally and for many years before RFK and his outfit came onto the scene.
This comes from years of study and goes far beyond what 'Bobby' will ever do.
Additionally, we have received zero financial benefit from this, which is not something Kennedy and his crew can say.
We could also get into many other positions which Kennedy supports which are outright abominable but again critical thinking is not possible when emotive adulation at play.
Why do you state that Sabine Hazan "...has nothing to offer anyone and knows not of what she is saying"? - What is your expertise?
It's clear both Bigtree and RFK Jr. are NOT opposed to vaccines. Both of them believe in Convid and in 'safe' vaccines. Please reconsider standing up for people like RFK Jr. and Dr. Hazan just because they are censored by the MSM. They are 'fighting' for people and that is why we should not be critical? Come on! "All vaccines attack the human microbiome. As such they cannot benefit health. The public does not know this because researchers like Dr. Hazan cannot get published." This is where you make a mistake: you make the public dependent on a scientist and on MSM/Scientific publishers. In my opinion the public doesn't know that all vaccines attack the micriobiome because the people that have been funding the development of vaccines for centuries are nefarious ánd they own the MSM, Alternative Media (97%), Universities and Scientific publishers.
Del Bigtree and RFK Jr, may state that they believe that it may be possible to develop 'safe' vaccines, but, that DOES NOT MEAN that they both believe there ARE currently 'safe' vaccines.
As a matter of fact, Bigtree contends that there are currently NO SAFE VACCINES:
If you can find the time to watch the following entire video, it's more than well worth your time.
SHOCKING VACCINE ADMISSIONS FROM INSIDE THE W.H.O.
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/shocking-vaccine-admissions-from-inside-the-w-h-o/
The above video of a supposedly closed "Global Vaccine Safety Summit" at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, on December 2-3, 2019, was secretly recorded and passed to Del Bigtree's ICAN organization. During this meeting, the worlds top vaccine officials lamented that there is not adequate safety data for any vaccine; and, the global public is starting to become aware of this fact.
Then, at time = 1:23:54 - Video statement by WHO Chief Scientist, 4 days prior to the Vaccine Safety Summit, where she states vaccines are very safe and we have a robust vaccine safety surveillance system.
But, then, this statement by WHO Chief Scientist, 4-days later:
"We cannot over emphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring system in many countries (and, often, when there's questions about deaths, "there's obfuscation"). "Risks are always there; and, the population needs to understand that and feel confidant that mechanisms are being put in place to study some of those things."
And, finally, Del Bigtree: "Are they lying? Can I use the word 'lying? W.H.O. - Is the WHO lying to you? Let me go out on a limb here: Yes. The World Health Organization, the leading authority of vaccine programs around the world, sponsored and funded by the pharmaceutical industry, the Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation, governments around the world, is lying to the world."
-------------
I did not state that Bigtree and RFK Jr. believe there currently ARE safe vaccines. From about July 2021 onwards I watched ALL of THW episodes and I receive the HW insiders e-mails because I like to check facts.
Bigtree believes in viruses and maybe therefor believes that we need vaccines. The 'science' behind viruses is fraudulent. Viruses cannot survive when seperated from the host and therefor cannot be transmitted outside of the body. I consider THW to be one of the best CO-alt-media where people are getting some truth, namely the truth 'they' are willing to share.
"It's clear both Bigtree and RFK Jr. are NOT opposed to vaccines."
Bigtree has effectively admitted to Sacha Stone in an interview that he is on board with (for want of a better term) 'terrain theory' but he does not have time to educate his audience because that would require him to spend 45 minutes at the start of each show explaining it to them.
He basically accused his own viewers of being too dumb to understand anything outside of the mainstream 'germ theory' paradigm. He said (my emphasis) "I'm left using the LIES and the language of the dreamscape, the matrix that we're living in..."
He went on to say "I have to speak the truth of the world that people believe in".
That quote should win some sort of prize for Orwellian double speak.
In another interview on the Alex Jones show (I think it was) he admitted that covid was a religion and that they couldn't even find the virus!
The interview clips are in this video.
https://odysee.com/@CoronaStudies:3/CS-BDS:5
So he accused his own viewers of being too dumb, but doesn't want to take the time to make one episode explaining the truth about Convid and vaccines and instead asks for money in EVERY episode?
AJ belongs to 'them', 'they' live and operate by a code. The code is that 'they' have to tell the truth about what 'they' are doing, 'they' have been using AJ and 97% of the other Alt-Media for that reason. Bigtree falls in that 97% controlled Alt-Media category.
“Now let me state very clearly that the mission of the Informed Consent Action Network my mission, The Highwire, Aaron's mission, in all the work that we do is to end mandates forever. I don't believe that any medical intervention should ever be mandated upon you. And we are working to get to that final end.
It starts by waking up the hearts and minds of the people, which is what The Highwire does every single week. But ultimately, you have to deal with legislators, and you have to deal with government, because as long as they're bringing it, for those of you that tried to get on a plane during COVID and weren't allowed to without proof of vaccination, for those of you trying to go to work but lost your job because you refused to, because you didn't have a vaccination and could not show proof of it, those mandates were real. And so unlike this person that's talking, I actually care about you too.
Just because some of us have opted out, just because I have a job where I can say, hey man, stay in your ground, I get it. I work at The Highwire. I'm[…]”
From The Highwire with Del Bigtree: THE SCIENCE OF STRATEGY: ICAN LEGISLATE’S VACCINE CONFIDENCE BILL DEMYSTIFIED, Jun 19, 2024
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree/id1227863378?i=1000659534298
This material may be protected by copyright.
The above is an actual transcript.
🫵👎
Take the largest "health freedom" outfit in the US, and the world I believe, RFK's Children's Health Defense. The entire edifice for this organization and RFK's credibility are now dependent on the "Wuhan lab leak", "gain of function" BS which is beyond a shadow of a doubt complete bunk.
And this has been pointed out directly and repeatedly to those in the highest positions of CHD (for over two years BTW) and they have chosen to dismiss/ignore such evidence as they know it destroys the story they would have everyone believe.
They know darn well of the barbarism in the nursing homes and hospitals and how that disrupts their claim of "viral pandemic" caused by GoF pathogen.
Currently such organizations and individuals that sit atop the alleged "health freedom movement" are THE biggest impediment to widespread understanding of what actually happened in 2020 (and beyond) and they are the most dishonest of all in my view.
👎
“Now let me state very clearly that the mission of the Informed Consent Action Network my mission, The Highwire, Aaron's mission, in all the work that we do is to end mandates forever. I don't believe that any medical intervention should ever be mandated upon you. And we are working to get to that final end.
It starts by waking up the hearts and minds of the people, which is what The Highwire does every single week. But ultimately, you have to deal with legislators, and you have to deal with government, because as long as they're bringing it, for those of you that tried to get on a plane during COVID and weren't allowed to without proof of vaccination, for those of you trying to go to work but lost your job because you refused to, because you didn't have a vaccination and could not show proof of it, those mandates were real. And so unlike this person that's talking, I actually care about you too.
Just because some of us have opted out, just because I have a job where I can say, hey man, stay in your ground, I get it. I work at The Highwire. I'm[…]”
From The Highwire with Del Bigtree: THE SCIENCE OF STRATEGY: ICAN LEGISLATE’S VACCINE CONFIDENCE BILL DEMYSTIFIED, Jun 19, 2024
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree/id1227863378?i=1000659534298
This material may be protected by copyright.
always surprised to read how many mothers are willing to have their babies, toddlers, children (and themselves) injected with unknown products, but it is good that there are... the only time I can understand is when there is no other available treatment - like a friend with cancer who tried a new product until she got too sick to try any further. Obviously it did not do the job...
Just like my daughter, married to a “medical professional “ who is all in on whatever comes down the farma shit chute. 12 years old grandson just got the hpv. He doesn’t have a cervix but the notion of shared burden and solidarity resonates. His father has to take him to get the shots in order to chase him down and pin him when he runs away trying to escape. This fall they will be first in line for the grand new combo vax. I know that if I say a word it will harden their position so I say nothing and just hope they wake up, and that it doesn’t take a tragedy for that to happen.
Richard I am so sorry for you and for the child, whom you are trying to protect. It is so sad how lots of doctors are completely brainwashed and seldom wake up, and then usually the hard way like Dr Malhotra whose dad died from aheart attack due to the jabs. Hoping for the best for you and your grandchild
Thank you for your kindness. I know there are many, probably the majority of us who are in similar situations.
..."My position is that all vaccines should be removed from the market yesterday"... yes every vaccine ever invented and still being marketed or used. Big pharma always creates the idea that they cannot use placebo groups because that denies "life saving" vaccines to subjects in those groups. What a freaking con.
What needs to happen but never will is that the 1986 vaccine laws need to be destroyed. Then we will see the truth since at that point, as big pharma claims, no vaccines will be injuring children. That would be the proof but we know the opposite will occur.
Aaron Siri says, "I haven't seen the Covid vaccine rushed."
Dr. Dolores Cahill, Immunologist, Phd (former professor at Trinity College, Dublin) has stated that for decades none of these (mRNA) vaccines were ever approved because of death and illness of the animals in studies.
Yep
https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein
Miss Sasha, beware of The High Wire, RFK Jr...etc etc. Frauds! They want SAFE vaccines which is not possible.
ps--if y'all paint Western themed pieces or American Indian paintings I'd be interested in aquiring--I am an American Indian, Kahane'wake---(Mohawk Tribe of the Iroquois Nation). My Daddy was born on an Indian Reservation in Quebec (Canada). Called First Nations Reserve up there. My Great Grandaddy was Jean Baptiste' Rice-(John the Baptist)-the first man to navigate The Saint Lawrence River (before it became Seaway). "Big John"--I was named after him.
The Last of the Mohicans--(that was us.) Enjoy!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vnc7uXq3ZnUS/
Ok great.
So NOW …according to all the posted comments here…we have no presidential candidates we can trust. The reaction is to boycott voting. Well, that’s NOTsmart or productive.
LETS COME WITH RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS/ ACTIONS alongside our concerns. Otherwise none of this is helpful..
Fairly simple answer (but it'll take many of us)--Easy to do:
"We no longer recognize your authority".
Reasons are many. Here's a reminder of ONE!---"You attempted to Genocide the entire population with a Death Jab."---and so on, and so on. Y'all don't need of complicated list of grievances--One will do.
That's where it needs to be.----Now! No further discussion or debate is required.
Shocked to see Siri spouting this. WTF is going on?
Mr Siri, like most persons in positions of "authority" has just proven his mental incompetence. His argument is contradictory regress argument, and his ethical stance is below that of a cock-a-roach.
I think he is thinking like a lawyer and trying to make a case against other vaccines. If a "safe, well-tested" vaccine like COVID has this many problems, then it will be obvious that they all poison.
Fair enough but I think it could backfire because there is a bigger camp of people who will take the statement at face value and use it against him. Sasha has pointed out the gaping ethical issues in his statements, and those statements could be seized upon to bypass those ethical issues to cause even more harm. It seems like a dangerous game to play.
Money