Also, just think how much of the public YOU could help if your organs were separated from your body and given to those "who really need them more than you."
Yep! What if the President needed bone marrow that matched one particular person? With the way the world is going, our health records would be available instantly without our consent.
I know people in U.K. who are horrifyingly confident that individuals are being targeted for their organs in U.K. I wish it wasn’t so horribly plausible. I think it’s very likely that this really is happening. I also feel very differently about the medivac helicopter fleet now, too. They’re privately owned within a charity.
Here in England, we have been made aware that the only human organs that can be used for transplanting are organs from a living human being. In other words, organs from a dead human are no good for transplants. We here are all consenting donors, unless we have opted out.
Because I don't trust them, I have opted out.
It is not a stretch to believe that they will kill you, to take your organs.
This could end US up like Canada, where almost at will of the govt (and the doctors) people are euthanized. I just read an article on Lew Rockwell's site where a bunch of Reps have voted with the Dems to allow yet more subsidies for gender surgery and abortions. Our lawmakers are no longer OUR lawmakers.
We pray that Leslie Manookian and other plaintiffs prove once and for all the essential rights of human beings to control what they inject, inhale, ingest, and wear in and on their own bodies.
The Supreme Court must reassert and forever memorialize the founding fathers intentions for America and free people all over the world. If this lawsuit fails, America is done as a free nation. The Court must codify nationwide what Idaho's S1210 Medical Freedom Act began in 2025: Substack: https://tinyurl.com/2wrefak8.
And, as Leslie Manookian stated: “This case is not just about the Covid crisis. It’s about the future of liberty in America.”
Geoengineering / weather modification / whatchamacallit is another activity going on without ANY informed consent. It's yet another globalist government experiment that debilitates and kills humans, plants, animals, air, water, and soil. Learn about geoengineering history; governmental, military, university, NGO, and individual backers; health destroying toxicity (very similar to jabs); and more in this presentation sponsored by Idaho's Gang of Eight: Substack Note with references: https://tinyurl.com/44dje5kp
Hello Big E. Right on once again. The "justices" within the Supreme Court need to be served notice via writ of Quo Warranto. >>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/quo_warranto There are other reference to the process available via search engines.
Supreme court executive staff are all in violation of Constitutional dictate, and are now acting as Accessories After the Fact. The "Facts" are multiple Murder in the First Degree.
“Under the Ninth Circuit’s framework, courts must accept the government’s assertions at face value and may not require evidence, justification, or even minimal proof.”
Wow! So we the people are supposed to just let the government, bought and paid for by special “interest” groups dictate without evidence. I don’t think so
Heh... I guess the Ninth Circuit judiciary is so busy running plaintiffs in circles, they haven't had time to review one of the most overlooked and unenforced Laws in the nation. >>>
Partial quote: '(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.' [End quote]
Hello belted radial. Glad you read the text and caught the ploy. I've read hundreds of Staute and Code. There are reasons these "Acts" are often referred to as "Codes". Nearly all courts in the former United States are Maritime courts. The "other" jurisdictions may represent international immunities clauses or military tribunal. All are farce. An example of non-enforced "Codes". 18 U.S. Code § 2339A - Providing material support to terrorists >>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2339A
“No person may be prosecuted under this section in connection with the term “personnel”, “training”, or “expert advice or assistance” if the provision of that material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization was approved by the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Attorney General. The Secretary of State may not approve the provision of any material support that may be used to carry out terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act).” Erm... Terrorists? "foriegn"?
Abolish the entire Public Health system. As with all the other systems, it’s become hopelessly corrupted, and does more harm than good. We can take better care of our own health. P.S. I worked at a county-level PH department for 14 years. One of the main parts of our mission statement was ‘to vaccinate/immunize as many people as possible’. At the time, I thought this wonderful. Not any more.
I would like someone, including anyone in the Ninth Circuit or on the Supreme Court, to point out the clause in the Constitution that lists "force medical interventions on people" as an enumerated power. The case law that assumes it is invalid under the "supreme law of the land" because that power does not exist and it was obviously never intended by the Founders to exist.
It is true that "for generations, Americans have relied on courts to balance public health needs with personal freedom," and that's the entire problem. There is no such thing as a balance between individual rights and "the public good." "Since there is no such entity as 'the public,' since the public is merely a number of individuals, any claimed or implied conflict of 'the public interest' with private interests means that the interests of some men are to be sacrificed to the interests and wishes of others." There's also no such thing as a "public health crisis," so for the petition to include that concept just grants the enemy's premise that there is. I understand how depraved the Ninth Circuit's decision is, but agreeing to the concept on which it's based is a losing strategy for freedom even if the decision is overturned.
If the plaintiffs succeed then any time the government claims to have "evidence" it will force people into fighting for their right to life in court against an all-powerful state that they're bankrolling, in a legal system in which the process is always the punishment. That's better than "please to roll up your sleeve, comrade" in name only. Does it still have to be said that if the government is given power to act in what it claims is an emergency then it will never stop finding reasons to declare emergencies, and that it will never stop expanding its definition of emergencies? That is in fact "a permanent justification for unchecked government power." The future of liberty in America will not be secured by a ruling for the plaintiffs, because any alleged right that's contingent on judicial review is not a right but a permission.
I agree with you 100%. I have the same opinion about the concept of religious, medical or personal exemptions. We should not have to ask permission from the government to not have our kids injected. So many are ignoring childhood vaccine mandates. And "medical freedom" frontrunners in SC don't even want to touch the childhood schedule, because pediatricians and pharmacists flock to the senate hearings to fight to keep injecting kids. However, there is a push now for states to do away with exemptions. A "Republican" senator and gubernatorial candidate in SC is hinting, Obama-style, at doing away with religious exemptions, in light of the current (manufactured) "measles outbreak" in the state. We should have NO mandates of ANY kind. That's why I wrote an Iowa-style bill (but even better) to ban mandates of medical ANY medical interventions. Three SC Freedom Caucus members have it, as well as a gubernatorial candidate. I am not holding my breath that they will fight for it. We need to put the pressure on and change the narrative, so that they will feel unpopular if they DON'T fight for our freedoms. I also wrote a bill to restore constitutionality, by repealing overreaching powers of the government and Department of Health to quarantine and isolate those who are "symptomatic or exposed" to a "disease." All states have similar laws to strip us of our bodily autonomy.
Unfortunately, the Elastic Clause of the Constitution, aka, the Necessary and Proper Clause, seems to be the loophole that our government has been using from the very founding of this nation and our Constitution, to live in the gray areas of the Constitution and make laws that are not explicitly enumerated: https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-elastic-clause-of-the-constitution-definition-example.html.
And now, the PREP Act is our biggest enemy. Even if we have "protective" laws in our states, the PREP Act, clearly violating the Constitution, but still not being repealed by Congress or ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and the PREP Act declarations not being ended by HHS/RFK, it overrides any state law, ends ANY judicial review, and bypasses Congressional approval or oversight. It continues the proliferation of unlawful EUA products that don't require testing or regulation.
Well said, but it might also be beneficial to petition the Justice Department to get involved and begin representing Plaintiffs against what amounts to state violations of the 13th and 14th Amendments. The nation is slowly stepping out of the epistemological quagmire of epidemiology and onto the solid ground of ethics. The Covid response was always, first and foremost, a failure of ethics. Foolish Federal policy notwithstanding, it’s the states that are at the heart of vaccine mandates and it’s the states that are wanting to take the country back to even before Jim Crow; even before *Plessy.* They want to take us back to Dredd Scott, before the 13th and 14th amendments when chattel slavery was the law of the land in many states. This time, however, they want people to be chattel of the state’s Public Health plantation. …. Think about it. First, the very fact that they now dismiss the federal CDC’s new recommendations are a clear indication that they support nullification and never really had respect for federalism. They supported federal health agencies as long as they were useful tools for their own agendas. Secondly, recognize that by historical precedent, the medical tyranny that they promote is actually WORSE than Plessy v. Ferguson, the infamous Supreme Court decision that enshrined racial segregation (“separate but equal,” or “Jim Crow”) laws for 3 or 4 generations until a more enlightened judiciary and citizenry, through their political representatives, overturned, repealed, and replaced that legal framework. When Homer Plessy challenged Louisiana’s *Separate Car Act* of 1890, he, at the time, at least had (in theory if not in practice) a “separate but equal” train car alternative in which to ride. Over a century later, parents who choose not to have their kids vaccinated don’t even get THAT from their government school districts! It’s basically, “give us your property tax dollars to send your children to a public school, but if you don’t get them vaccinated then we’re not going to offer you a separate but equal school alternative, and we’re certainly not going to refund your property tax, and we’re not going to pay for your private school, so you’re on your own, Uncle Tom.” It’s all absolutely despicable! Again, stop and think about what’s going on here: When Rosa Parks was told she could only sit at the back of the bus, AT LEAST SHE COULD GET ON THE BUS AND HAVE A SEAT IN WHICH TO RIDE! These deeply unethical state governments with their deeply unethical school districts WON’T EVEN ALLOW YOUR UNVACCINATED CHILD TO GET ON THE (SCHOOL) BUS, LET ALONE SIT IN THE BACK WITH THE UNWASHED UNVACCINATED WHO APPARENTLY ENJOY ONLY 3/5 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTIES AS THE HOLY VACCINATED, pun intended. The laws prohibiting this type of tyranny are already on the books and well established. They’re called the 13th and 14th amendments, bolstered by Brown v. BoE and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In other words, this shouldn’t just be a legal battle by private citizens; it’s first and foremost an assignment for the Federal Justice Department, civil rights division if not criminal division. The Federal Justice Department would be derelict in its duty if it fails to challenge state laws that are an obvious violation of the Constitution.
I respect that you put your money where your mouth is and wrote legislation.
The Necessary & Proper and General Welfare ideas so obviously negate everything else in the Constitution that they must have been included with that end in mind. I mean, the Founders were all still around when people started inventing crap that was necessary and proper and served the general welfare. Maybe call everybody back to Philadelphia and fix that.
For myself I think the time is past for trying to play by the cryptocracy's rigged rules. The solution to all the bullshit is simple enough: "Is hereby repealed." If there were a political will for that, it would already be done. Instead courts and legislatures have to be constantly flogged into half-assed, reluctant, nebulous assertions that they'll to do something material to help reverse the decline and never do. They're all on board with the status quo and with the premises that make it possible, and despite running on promises of "change" they wouldn't run at all if they weren't expecting to benefit from the existing rules. I think that nullification through non-compliance and the building of parallel economies and social networks is the way forward, or better yet secession. Leave the kakistocrats to loot what's left of the corpse, because it can't be reanimated. Learn from the Founders' mistakes and start over. In the meantime, refuse to comply, and know that setting a moral example can encourage other people to pronounce the word "No."
Hello Fager 132. Totally agree. Your middle paragraph fully nails the target. Also: "There's also no such thing as a "public health crisis," so for the petition to include that concept just grants the enemy's premise that there is." [End quote] Right on.
These alleged attorneys have all been trained within the same 'legal' BAR system, and have no clue that they're THE problem, in spades. All licenced attorneys and judges are surrogate to the International BAR Association in London, England. You may find this statement interesting: "The “STATE OF…” B.A.R. is an unconstitutional monopoly, an illegal, “Continuing Criminal Enterprise,” in violation of Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U.S Constitution. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the B.A.R. is attempting. “B.A.R.” members have invaded all branches of govt. & are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!" [End quote] B.A.R. Attorneys/Attorneys Are Not Licensed Complete text: https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/b-a-r-attorniesattorneys-are-not-licensed/
Lawyers are a lot like doctors and virologists in never questioning the foundations of their professions. They see them as a metaphysical given, like cattle see ear tags, and as a good never to be questioned.
Yes. True. But *ignorance* of Law fails to provide legal protection to violations of Law. Driver of vehicle going 115 MPH in a 30. "Really officer. I didn't know I was speeding. I didn't *see* the sign!"
If someone is vaccinated and their vaccine works then you are no threat. If their vaccine does not work then they shouldn't be taking it. I do not understand what is difficult to comprehend about this for people like King County officials.
Hard to educate people about anything when most public schools are offering highly sub-optimal educations at massively inflated prices. The powers that be want the kids to be dumb.The majority of kids are now graduating high school can only read (if at all) at grade school levels. Because learning is a form of white supremacy.
It seems to me that there are two elephants in the room that must be brought into the public discussion. One of those elephants is the globalist population reduction goals. The second elephant is that psychopaths are disproportionately present in positions of wealth and power. With those two issues openly acknowledged by the sane majority all of the crazy attacks on humanity become understandable.
On the other hand, without recognizing those huge facts, most people presume our leaders are sane and have our interests in mind. Instead of recognizing the effects of psychopathy, most people presume that greed is driving everything. While greed does exist, it becomes infinitely more problematic, when psychopathy is added on top of greed to produce the gargantuan problems we are facing today.
That "positions of power" thing, though. That can quite often be a chicken or egg conundrum. I've seen people that you would never suspect become total monsters when it was their turn at the helm. Power is a very,very difficult thing to handle.
Determining causality is tricky. In fact, both roots may exist depending on the particular situation. On the psychopathy comes first option I posted an article on Substack that provides reasons why the causality appears to begin with psychopathy. Sociopaths develop but Psychopaths are born without a conscience. Here's a link to that article which introduces a solution to the power problem: https://open.substack.com/pub/georgechyz303313/p/how-psychopaths-prevent-peace-and?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
I understand why Leslie is pursuing this route-- fight the battle on the grounds that one can possibly win. However, as Leslie knows, the idea from Jacobson that individual liberties need to be "balanced" against the government's need to protect public health -- especially in the case of vaccinations -- was based on erroneous science. There is no such thing as "herd immunity". This is one of the rare cases where the rights of the individual do not in any way infringe upon the rights of the majority.
Also, just think how much of the public YOU could help if your organs were separated from your body and given to those "who really need them more than you."
Heh, heh... People are just like used cars. They're worth more money if ya part 'em out...
CCP has perfected that approach.
Yep! What if the President needed bone marrow that matched one particular person? With the way the world is going, our health records would be available instantly without our consent.
I know people in U.K. who are horrifyingly confident that individuals are being targeted for their organs in U.K. I wish it wasn’t so horribly plausible. I think it’s very likely that this really is happening. I also feel very differently about the medivac helicopter fleet now, too. They’re privately owned within a charity.
Facing their sadistic savagery has inspired me . That inspiration led me here.
I don’t believe it was accidental - rather it is as it was meant to be .
What an undeserved bonus I have been given.
Amazing is the grace of God.
Thank you and God bless you n yours.
There is no such thing as anonymity.
Let me contact a friend & get back to you.
This has been happening in Australia for some time .
“ just eat shit and die “ is a wonderfully appropriate turn of phrase….under the circumstances.
Indeed.
Here in England, we have been made aware that the only human organs that can be used for transplanting are organs from a living human being. In other words, organs from a dead human are no good for transplants. We here are all consenting donors, unless we have opted out.
Because I don't trust them, I have opted out.
It is not a stretch to believe that they will kill you, to take your organs.
Exactly how these globalists think! Excellent example of what's happening in Canada
This could end US up like Canada, where almost at will of the govt (and the doctors) people are euthanized. I just read an article on Lew Rockwell's site where a bunch of Reps have voted with the Dems to allow yet more subsidies for gender surgery and abortions. Our lawmakers are no longer OUR lawmakers.
Bought & paid for
Being sponsored by eugenicists tends to do that.
Yes! Crush that shit now before these globalists banksters Rothschilds take USA over like they did in Canada. We are fully fucked in Cuckistan
One of the worst activist courts in the country and a highlight of just how corrupt the judiciary is.
The”Nonth” and the Supremely Stupid Roberts (Socialist) Court (Club) have crushed CommonSense and the Constitution.
We pray that Leslie Manookian and other plaintiffs prove once and for all the essential rights of human beings to control what they inject, inhale, ingest, and wear in and on their own bodies.
The Supreme Court must reassert and forever memorialize the founding fathers intentions for America and free people all over the world. If this lawsuit fails, America is done as a free nation. The Court must codify nationwide what Idaho's S1210 Medical Freedom Act began in 2025: Substack: https://tinyurl.com/2wrefak8.
And, as Leslie Manookian stated: “This case is not just about the Covid crisis. It’s about the future of liberty in America.”
Geoengineering / weather modification / whatchamacallit is another activity going on without ANY informed consent. It's yet another globalist government experiment that debilitates and kills humans, plants, animals, air, water, and soil. Learn about geoengineering history; governmental, military, university, NGO, and individual backers; health destroying toxicity (very similar to jabs); and more in this presentation sponsored by Idaho's Gang of Eight: Substack Note with references: https://tinyurl.com/44dje5kp
Hello Big E. Right on once again. The "justices" within the Supreme Court need to be served notice via writ of Quo Warranto. >>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/quo_warranto There are other reference to the process available via search engines.
Supreme court executive staff are all in violation of Constitutional dictate, and are now acting as Accessories After the Fact. The "Facts" are multiple Murder in the First Degree.
👍
“Under the Ninth Circuit’s framework, courts must accept the government’s assertions at face value and may not require evidence, justification, or even minimal proof.”
Wow! So we the people are supposed to just let the government, bought and paid for by special “interest” groups dictate without evidence. I don’t think so
Heh... I guess the Ninth Circuit judiciary is so busy running plaintiffs in circles, they haven't had time to review one of the most overlooked and unenforced Laws in the nation. >>>
18 U.S. Code § 1111 - Murder >>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1111
Partial quote: '(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.' [End quote]
It is helpful to review the entire text...
Hello belted radial. Glad you read the text and caught the ploy. I've read hundreds of Staute and Code. There are reasons these "Acts" are often referred to as "Codes". Nearly all courts in the former United States are Maritime courts. The "other" jurisdictions may represent international immunities clauses or military tribunal. All are farce. An example of non-enforced "Codes". 18 U.S. Code § 2339A - Providing material support to terrorists >>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2339A
18 U.S. Code § 2339B - Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations >>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2339B
Waaay down the final clause: (j) Exception.—
“No person may be prosecuted under this section in connection with the term “personnel”, “training”, or “expert advice or assistance” if the provision of that material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization was approved by the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Attorney General. The Secretary of State may not approve the provision of any material support that may be used to carry out terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act).” Erm... Terrorists? "foriegn"?
The plebs continue to continue...
Thank you, Sasha, for this important post. You are my hero. (I like this painting too. Oil?)
Barbara
Excellent interview. I think that conversation that you two just had IS actually becoming more normal.
The 9th Circuit tyranny decision will eventually be overturned but social evolution is slow until it isn't.
Abolish the entire Public Health system. As with all the other systems, it’s become hopelessly corrupted, and does more harm than good. We can take better care of our own health. P.S. I worked at a county-level PH department for 14 years. One of the main parts of our mission statement was ‘to vaccinate/immunize as many people as possible’. At the time, I thought this wonderful. Not any more.
I would like someone, including anyone in the Ninth Circuit or on the Supreme Court, to point out the clause in the Constitution that lists "force medical interventions on people" as an enumerated power. The case law that assumes it is invalid under the "supreme law of the land" because that power does not exist and it was obviously never intended by the Founders to exist.
It is true that "for generations, Americans have relied on courts to balance public health needs with personal freedom," and that's the entire problem. There is no such thing as a balance between individual rights and "the public good." "Since there is no such entity as 'the public,' since the public is merely a number of individuals, any claimed or implied conflict of 'the public interest' with private interests means that the interests of some men are to be sacrificed to the interests and wishes of others." There's also no such thing as a "public health crisis," so for the petition to include that concept just grants the enemy's premise that there is. I understand how depraved the Ninth Circuit's decision is, but agreeing to the concept on which it's based is a losing strategy for freedom even if the decision is overturned.
If the plaintiffs succeed then any time the government claims to have "evidence" it will force people into fighting for their right to life in court against an all-powerful state that they're bankrolling, in a legal system in which the process is always the punishment. That's better than "please to roll up your sleeve, comrade" in name only. Does it still have to be said that if the government is given power to act in what it claims is an emergency then it will never stop finding reasons to declare emergencies, and that it will never stop expanding its definition of emergencies? That is in fact "a permanent justification for unchecked government power." The future of liberty in America will not be secured by a ruling for the plaintiffs, because any alleged right that's contingent on judicial review is not a right but a permission.
I agree with you 100%. I have the same opinion about the concept of religious, medical or personal exemptions. We should not have to ask permission from the government to not have our kids injected. So many are ignoring childhood vaccine mandates. And "medical freedom" frontrunners in SC don't even want to touch the childhood schedule, because pediatricians and pharmacists flock to the senate hearings to fight to keep injecting kids. However, there is a push now for states to do away with exemptions. A "Republican" senator and gubernatorial candidate in SC is hinting, Obama-style, at doing away with religious exemptions, in light of the current (manufactured) "measles outbreak" in the state. We should have NO mandates of ANY kind. That's why I wrote an Iowa-style bill (but even better) to ban mandates of medical ANY medical interventions. Three SC Freedom Caucus members have it, as well as a gubernatorial candidate. I am not holding my breath that they will fight for it. We need to put the pressure on and change the narrative, so that they will feel unpopular if they DON'T fight for our freedoms. I also wrote a bill to restore constitutionality, by repealing overreaching powers of the government and Department of Health to quarantine and isolate those who are "symptomatic or exposed" to a "disease." All states have similar laws to strip us of our bodily autonomy.
Unfortunately, the Elastic Clause of the Constitution, aka, the Necessary and Proper Clause, seems to be the loophole that our government has been using from the very founding of this nation and our Constitution, to live in the gray areas of the Constitution and make laws that are not explicitly enumerated: https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-elastic-clause-of-the-constitution-definition-example.html.
And now, the PREP Act is our biggest enemy. Even if we have "protective" laws in our states, the PREP Act, clearly violating the Constitution, but still not being repealed by Congress or ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and the PREP Act declarations not being ended by HHS/RFK, it overrides any state law, ends ANY judicial review, and bypasses Congressional approval or oversight. It continues the proliferation of unlawful EUA products that don't require testing or regulation.
Well said, but it might also be beneficial to petition the Justice Department to get involved and begin representing Plaintiffs against what amounts to state violations of the 13th and 14th Amendments. The nation is slowly stepping out of the epistemological quagmire of epidemiology and onto the solid ground of ethics. The Covid response was always, first and foremost, a failure of ethics. Foolish Federal policy notwithstanding, it’s the states that are at the heart of vaccine mandates and it’s the states that are wanting to take the country back to even before Jim Crow; even before *Plessy.* They want to take us back to Dredd Scott, before the 13th and 14th amendments when chattel slavery was the law of the land in many states. This time, however, they want people to be chattel of the state’s Public Health plantation. …. Think about it. First, the very fact that they now dismiss the federal CDC’s new recommendations are a clear indication that they support nullification and never really had respect for federalism. They supported federal health agencies as long as they were useful tools for their own agendas. Secondly, recognize that by historical precedent, the medical tyranny that they promote is actually WORSE than Plessy v. Ferguson, the infamous Supreme Court decision that enshrined racial segregation (“separate but equal,” or “Jim Crow”) laws for 3 or 4 generations until a more enlightened judiciary and citizenry, through their political representatives, overturned, repealed, and replaced that legal framework. When Homer Plessy challenged Louisiana’s *Separate Car Act* of 1890, he, at the time, at least had (in theory if not in practice) a “separate but equal” train car alternative in which to ride. Over a century later, parents who choose not to have their kids vaccinated don’t even get THAT from their government school districts! It’s basically, “give us your property tax dollars to send your children to a public school, but if you don’t get them vaccinated then we’re not going to offer you a separate but equal school alternative, and we’re certainly not going to refund your property tax, and we’re not going to pay for your private school, so you’re on your own, Uncle Tom.” It’s all absolutely despicable! Again, stop and think about what’s going on here: When Rosa Parks was told she could only sit at the back of the bus, AT LEAST SHE COULD GET ON THE BUS AND HAVE A SEAT IN WHICH TO RIDE! These deeply unethical state governments with their deeply unethical school districts WON’T EVEN ALLOW YOUR UNVACCINATED CHILD TO GET ON THE (SCHOOL) BUS, LET ALONE SIT IN THE BACK WITH THE UNWASHED UNVACCINATED WHO APPARENTLY ENJOY ONLY 3/5 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTIES AS THE HOLY VACCINATED, pun intended. The laws prohibiting this type of tyranny are already on the books and well established. They’re called the 13th and 14th amendments, bolstered by Brown v. BoE and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In other words, this shouldn’t just be a legal battle by private citizens; it’s first and foremost an assignment for the Federal Justice Department, civil rights division if not criminal division. The Federal Justice Department would be derelict in its duty if it fails to challenge state laws that are an obvious violation of the Constitution.
I respect that you put your money where your mouth is and wrote legislation.
The Necessary & Proper and General Welfare ideas so obviously negate everything else in the Constitution that they must have been included with that end in mind. I mean, the Founders were all still around when people started inventing crap that was necessary and proper and served the general welfare. Maybe call everybody back to Philadelphia and fix that.
For myself I think the time is past for trying to play by the cryptocracy's rigged rules. The solution to all the bullshit is simple enough: "Is hereby repealed." If there were a political will for that, it would already be done. Instead courts and legislatures have to be constantly flogged into half-assed, reluctant, nebulous assertions that they'll to do something material to help reverse the decline and never do. They're all on board with the status quo and with the premises that make it possible, and despite running on promises of "change" they wouldn't run at all if they weren't expecting to benefit from the existing rules. I think that nullification through non-compliance and the building of parallel economies and social networks is the way forward, or better yet secession. Leave the kakistocrats to loot what's left of the corpse, because it can't be reanimated. Learn from the Founders' mistakes and start over. In the meantime, refuse to comply, and know that setting a moral example can encourage other people to pronounce the word "No."
Hello Fager 132. Totally agree. Your middle paragraph fully nails the target. Also: "There's also no such thing as a "public health crisis," so for the petition to include that concept just grants the enemy's premise that there is." [End quote] Right on.
These alleged attorneys have all been trained within the same 'legal' BAR system, and have no clue that they're THE problem, in spades. All licenced attorneys and judges are surrogate to the International BAR Association in London, England. You may find this statement interesting: "The “STATE OF…” B.A.R. is an unconstitutional monopoly, an illegal, “Continuing Criminal Enterprise,” in violation of Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U.S Constitution. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the B.A.R. is attempting. “B.A.R.” members have invaded all branches of govt. & are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!" [End quote] B.A.R. Attorneys/Attorneys Are Not Licensed Complete text: https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/b-a-r-attorniesattorneys-are-not-licensed/
Lawyers are a lot like doctors and virologists in never questioning the foundations of their professions. They see them as a metaphysical given, like cattle see ear tags, and as a good never to be questioned.
Yes. True. But *ignorance* of Law fails to provide legal protection to violations of Law. Driver of vehicle going 115 MPH in a 30. "Really officer. I didn't know I was speeding. I didn't *see* the sign!"
Well said! Thank you.
I refused the vaccine, then terminated. My employer, King County, said I was a threat to the public and my co-workers.
If someone is vaccinated and their vaccine works then you are no threat. If their vaccine does not work then they shouldn't be taking it. I do not understand what is difficult to comprehend about this for people like King County officials.
Amazing interview. We all as people need to study and know the laws and our rights, not just blindly follow fools.
Hard to educate people about anything when most public schools are offering highly sub-optimal educations at massively inflated prices. The powers that be want the kids to be dumb.The majority of kids are now graduating high school can only read (if at all) at grade school levels. Because learning is a form of white supremacy.
No limitless state power; living in a state that is so corrupt
DISGUSTING PSYCHOTIC PSYCHOPATHS!
It’s also fascinating to hear the tone of “ outrage “ .
Here in Australia the silence is deafening.
Five years ago the so called freedom politicians hid the fact that they , were exempt from the mandates.
The corruption is massive.
It seems to me that there are two elephants in the room that must be brought into the public discussion. One of those elephants is the globalist population reduction goals. The second elephant is that psychopaths are disproportionately present in positions of wealth and power. With those two issues openly acknowledged by the sane majority all of the crazy attacks on humanity become understandable.
On the other hand, without recognizing those huge facts, most people presume our leaders are sane and have our interests in mind. Instead of recognizing the effects of psychopathy, most people presume that greed is driving everything. While greed does exist, it becomes infinitely more problematic, when psychopathy is added on top of greed to produce the gargantuan problems we are facing today.
That "positions of power" thing, though. That can quite often be a chicken or egg conundrum. I've seen people that you would never suspect become total monsters when it was their turn at the helm. Power is a very,very difficult thing to handle.
Determining causality is tricky. In fact, both roots may exist depending on the particular situation. On the psychopathy comes first option I posted an article on Substack that provides reasons why the causality appears to begin with psychopathy. Sociopaths develop but Psychopaths are born without a conscience. Here's a link to that article which introduces a solution to the power problem: https://open.substack.com/pub/georgechyz303313/p/how-psychopaths-prevent-peace-and?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
I understand why Leslie is pursuing this route-- fight the battle on the grounds that one can possibly win. However, as Leslie knows, the idea from Jacobson that individual liberties need to be "balanced" against the government's need to protect public health -- especially in the case of vaccinations -- was based on erroneous science. There is no such thing as "herd immunity". This is one of the rare cases where the rights of the individual do not in any way infringe upon the rights of the majority.