Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Maxgrau's avatar

I think that today the discussion about vaccines should not remained limited to the damages they cause, but it should also take into account the broader context of their use. The mere fact that there are globalist organizations like the WHO and GAVI that want to force vaccines on the world should be enough to convince us that these vaccines are not about public health, but part of their agenda.

Knowing that their agenda includes the "Fourth Industrial Revolution and transhumanism", the modification of our DNA seems to be the end goal of these enemies of humanity. If we see vaccines in that context, we should not trust anyone in the field of medicine who is not an absolute anti-vaxxer.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

This interview was posted on another web site the other day - to which I commented: For readers who may question Ms. Latypova’s analyses, I recommend a careful reading of opening comments:

“I have previously written about the phenomenon of anaphylaxis produced by injections of various proteins, even the ones considered benign and safe as food (milk, egg, albumin, yeast, etc.).

For this discovery, Charles Richet was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1913. The phenomenon of the injection-induced anaphylaxis originates in the gut and underlies the development of chronic autoimmune conditions, metabolic dysfunction, neurodegenerative and mental illness (neurotransmitters are made in the gut), cancers and other chronic illness.” Refer to article here.

"Alimentary Anaphylaxis", or the origins of the Anything-But-Vaccines deflection strategy. >>> SASHA LATYPOVA >>> July 7, 2025 >>> https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/alimentary-anaphylaxis-a-book-by

91 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?