69 Comments
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Nice summary of your work. On many levels I'm horrified that this is the only narrative that makes logical sense. The Technocrats want to dramatically reduce the world's population. Only remaining question: how do they protect themselves? They have poisoned our air, water and soil. What's next?

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

The Technocrats had Trump sign Executive Order 13887 which 1) set the stage for mRNA & DNA Injections; 2) turned over design, manufacturing and distribution to the military, 3) set up private-public partnerships with big pharma, 4) set up task force co-headed by Secretary of Defense. He did this on Sept. 19, 2019, BEFORE we heard a word about the plandemic. Later, Trump signs Operation Warp Speed, (ha), and EUA Countermeasures. This democide has been planed over decades putting in place policies that effect biology but not in a positive way. Life Expectancy is in a nose dive. Your children will have a shorter life expectancy than you according to Kaiser Per.

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

I thought this was one of the best interviews and I attribute it to the interviewer who was knowledgeable and let you expand fully each point plus I love Aussie accents. Well done!

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

It is so hard to accept that our government is trying to kill us, but the evidence is irrefutable. Our poor kids and grandkids. How do we stop these evil doers?

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Haven’t had a chance to listen yet, but, oh, the art!!

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Wow! Just Wow! You are amazing human beings. Thank you for all you do.

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Fantastic interview. Thank you again for your hard work!

Mirrored to Odysee:

https://odysee.com/@SubversionDiversion:8/Full-Interview-with-Refuge-of-Sinners-by-Sasha-Latypova:b

Expand full comment
Mar 9·edited Mar 17Liked by Sasha Latypova

I also stopped watching TV decades ago. It seems to be one of the things common to people who immediately recognized the scamdemic for what it was.

How to kill Coronavirus: https://i.ibb.co/sjvNqHh/Corona-Virus-TV.jpg

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Confirms it all. Thank you

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Love this dragon!! Please do more of these!

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

The Food and Drug Administration (along with all other Federal and State agency) have been complicit and negligent regarding the unlawful and dangerous precedence set by *Corporate dictate* rather than Lawful *action's* via the above jurisdictions.

*Revocation of individual Corporate Charter* would a viable Lawful action to be considered. >>> Procedural example from the State of Delaware: https://law.justia.com/codes/delaware/2018/title-8/chapter-1/subchapter-x/section-284/

Filing of an "quo warranto" action is also recommended: Quote: Quo warranto is Latin for "by what warrant” (or authority). A writ of quo warranto is a common law remedy which is used to challenge a person's right to hold a public or corporate office. A state may also use a quo warranto action to revoke a corporation's charter. When bringing a petition for writ of quo warranto, individual members of the public have standing as citizens and taxpayers." Please refer to complete section: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/quo_warranto

Or Quote: "A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondent claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondent to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondent must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office. The writ is unlike a petition or motion to show cause, because the burden of proof is on the respondent, not on the demandant. By itself, the writ does not seek the support of the court to order the respondent to cease the exercise or vacate the office. That would be an accompanying writ of prohibito or a writ of mandamus. All such writs contemplate enforcement by the people as militia, although that could include the sheriff or constable as commander of militia. The right involved is that of the respondent to present his evidence."

Complete text: https://constitution.org/1-Activism/writ/quo_warranto.htm

Expand full comment
Mar 8Liked by Sasha Latypova

Sasha I would like to hear your thoughts on this doctor on substack who is filing this case

Case # SC2024-0327 was filed in the Supreme Court of Florida. As a pro se litigant I filed a Writ of Mandamus with the Supreme Court of Florida. This Mandamus seeks to compel Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody to prohibit the distribution of ‘COVID 19 injections’ AKA ‘COVID-19 nanoparticle injections’ or ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ in the State of Florida.

Does this carry any weight at all or is it more of the same theater and distraction

Nothing makes sense any more

I trust your take on this

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Very worthwhile interview! Thank you Plasmid DNA not mRNA…. Holy Jesus Christ help us, heal our lives ones by your precious blood 🩸 Protect and provide for Dr Latypova and all associates. ❤️

Expand full comment

I can see this dragon adorn a children's book.

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Sasha Latypova

Sacha punches way above her weight.

Expand full comment
Mar 8Liked by Sasha Latypova

An excellent interview. Scary to think how corrupt certain elements within our government have become. God bless you Sasha for exposing and explaining all this evil.

Expand full comment