Do Governments Track the Injury and Kill Rates from Biowarfare Agents Deployed as mRNA/DNA "Vaccines"?

Some public databases provide clear visuals of intentional harm on the population

Katherine Watt at Bailiwick News posted several ideas for FOIA requests, including:

Signed, dated copies of reports to Congress, prepared and submitted by DOD and HHS, under 50 USC 1512, 50 USC 1513, 50 USC 1518, 50 USC 1523, and 50 USC 1528, and/or any other applicable Congressional notice and/or reporting law, quantifying the mortality and morbidity data collected from any and all government databases (VAERS, V-Safe, VA, DMED, etc), contract manufacturer and subcontractor databases (ATI, Pfizer, Moderna, Ventavia, ICON, etc.), and private health insurance databases (Kaiser, Blue Cross, etc.), assessing the effectiveness of the mRNA/LNP class of bioweapons for incapacitating, sterilizing and killing adults and children, from the start of the events known as “Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials” in Spring 2020 to the present.

Draft Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to DOD and HHS

My guess is that the response from the agencies will be that they do not track data on bioweapon deployment because those are prohibited by international laws, and the US Government would never do such a thing as to lie to the public about biochemical weapons, “pandemic” and “vaccines”, you silly conspiracists!

However, some governments appear to maintain excellent data tracking “the kill”. Here is an example sent to me by a colleague form Australia, of an online database with beautiful graphing tools (this is for New South Wales). NSW includes Sydney, it’s population is ~8 million (of Australia’s total of about 25M) and was founded by the British as a penal colony. Perhaps that last factoid is why they are so unabashedly clear in reporting the results of their mass injury/murder campaign? Or maybe they simply have good database skills available.

Link to NSW data online.

Some screenshots from the database:

1. Rates (per 1M) of deaths+ICU+hospital (no ICU) per vax status and per number of doses:

2. Rates (per 1M) of deaths+ICU per vax status and per number of doses:

3. Rates (per 1M) of deaths per vax status and per number of doses:

   

I think these graphs speak for themselves, but if anyone wanted a clear evidence that these injury/sterilization/kill campaigns are intentional campaigns by militarized governments against public - look no further. The length of time that this atrocity is allowed to continue while every government’s “official” response is that “the mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives and are safe and effective” is clear evidence by itself.

Note - for those who want to “debate” based on some co-variate, like age: it may be that there are more older people in the 4 dose category (I did not check). However, getting 4 experimental injections at the age when one would be expected to die from all causes seems like a special category of stupid health policy to me.

These results are completely consistent with findings in datasets that do not include people close to the age of life expectancy but include working-age adults, for example, Kaiser Permanente study:

Negative vaccine efficacy keeps rearing its ugly head. Now Kaiser admits it.

and Cleveland Clinic study in their own employees. Note that I disagree with characterization of Cleveland Clinic as a “reputable organization with no apparent bias” - they are as disreputable and biased.

Cleveland Clinic preprint: more covid in employees who took more covid vaccines

The bottom line of all of this - injections are designed as weapons, and their effect is dose-dependent: the more doses you get the more likely you are to be hospitalized and to die.

I sometimes get emails with statements by analysts from the “medical freedom” side who look at similar public health databases and say things along the following lines:

• Calling the poisonous injections vaccines (in earnest);

• Finding periods of time in some early portion of the series, where the fluctuating data for vaxxed and unvaxxed briefly flips and calling that “early protective effect that waned over time”;

• Fixating on the need to demonstrate “excess mortality” from the shots as some sort of definitive statistic that would convince the government agencies to stop this atrocity.

My answers to this: it is true that injections of random poisons in random quantities resulting from chaotic manufacturing are technically consistent with historical vaccination practices which are largely rooted in voodoo. However, the “mRNA/DNA” version of this is a different class of things altogether - a carefully orchestrated psychological-chemical-biowarfare designed to drive largely voluntary self-harm and suicide under the pretense of a public health emergency and “vaccination” campaign. No “protective” effects can exist from deployment of poisons, and clearly none are shown when data are examined over longer time, e.g. 6-18 months. Something that “protected” you for 3-6 weeks but caused higher probability of illness and death later on did not protect you from anything to begin with.

No drug in history of product recalls was taken off the market for causing “excess” mortality. Typically tens to a few hundred death reports (depending on population and indication) would suffice to trigger at least a serious review, a “black box” warning on the label, or a full recall. In some cases it took a long time to find the association, but no health agency or manufacturer was historically insane enough to require demonstration of excess mortality as a trigger for a safety signal in their pharmacovigilance system. Chasing excess mortality data is a fool’s errand in my opinion. The regulators will continue pretending they are not aware of any safety concerns or, even after acknowledging a safety concerns like myocarditis, will proceed to no action whatsoever.

To be sure, government agencies all over the world are tracking the injury and kill rates. Databases like the one at NSW are routinely established, and from this data it is easy to make estimates for the entire country (assuming the same poison is applied everywhere). This is intentional, just like everything else around this atrocity is completely intentional.

Art for today: Will, oil on panel, 12x16 in.