D4CE Symposium 5, Session III: Getting Away From the Control Grid

Doctors For Covid Ethics Symposium Series

Link to the recordings from this event.

Several weeks ago I was invited to speak at the 5th online symposium organized by D4CE. This is a day-long event, covering many aspects of the global atrocity. You can find the recordings by following the provided links.

About D4CE: Doctors for Covid Ethics (CD4E) is a non-profit standing for truth and ethics in science and medicine, and therefore opposing the ongoing abuse of science and medicine for the destruction of peoples’ health, livelihoods, and even lives. This abuse includes but is not limited to the “public health” measures taken in the contrived COVID “pandemic.”

Session III of our fifth symposium, In the Midst of Darkness Light Prevails, focused on the means by which the entities and actors responsible for the abuses of COVID-19 have circumvented due process, regulatory safeguards, and the law.

There were several great speakers in this session, and I learned a lot from them about the global banking cartel and ongoing attack on sovereignty of individuals and nation states (or rights of US states). Short summary of what is included in this segment.

Part 1 – John Titus: CBDC Suicide Pill for Sovereignty:

Attorney John Titus discussed how and why the Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) currently being proposed and trialed in a number of countries spell an end to individual and national sovereignty. You will find John’s speech at the beginning of the session following this link.

Part 2 – Overriding Sovereignty with International Treaties and Organizations.

Corey Lynn: Laundering with Immunity – The Control Framework

Investigative journalist Corey Lynn of Corey’s Digs described a number of mechanisms by which many of the world’s most globally powerful organizations operate not only above the law “but completely outside it.” One key mechanism enabling this is the little-known International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945. The Act grants sweeping legal immunities to transnational organizations with deeply vested interests, including the WHO, the UN, and the Gates-founded Global Fund.

This session included a panel discussion.

Catherine Austin Fitts was joined by Attorney Carolyn A. Betts Esq. for a panel discussion on real world implications of an entire global system operating outside the law. They covered:

• The tens of trillions that have gone missing from the US Department of Defense and Department of Housing and Urban Development, with the potential to launder those trillions around the globe

• The global financial crisis of 2008 and the legal immunity enjoyed by banks

• The potential to engineer reduced life expectancy as a means of addressing the US crisis in retirement savings

• Atrocities and abuses committed in the name of COVID-19, where a series of immunities have been delivered in the healthcare sector, and through the application of military laws to “vaccine” authorization and manufacture under emergency powers, to be discussed by upcoming speakers. All of which dovetails, they noted, with the immunity enjoyed by international financial organizations such as the BIS, IMF and World Bank, which has enabled a “tsunami of money” to prop up WHO directives and subsequent military-medical countermeasures.

Part 3: Overriding Sovereignty with Military Law and Emergency Power

My session covering the organizational structure of the intentionally harmful so-called “covid response”. I discussed the US military-intelligence agencies control over COVID-19 vaccines and interventions. Contrary to public knowledge, this legislative framework enabled COVID ‘medicine’ to be taken out of medical regulators’ hands, and placed under the control of the National Security Council (NSC) and the Department of Defense (DoD). The shift from public health to military oversight took place on orders from the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), a political appointee.

Panel Discussion (from 20 min):

Dr Meryl Nass MD observed that the DoD has long been looking for a grey area between experimental products and licensed medicines, both of which are tightly regulated. She stressed that, assuming the information presented by Alexandra Latypova and Katherine Watts is accurate, “some of this is clearly illegal… This all has to be put in front of a judge.”

Catherine Austin Fitts recalled the importance of public opinion to the judiciary, as discussed in Session II. She noted that one lesson learned as an official in Washington is that if something continues to go on despite not being effective, the real goal is not the stated goal, but what is transpiring – in this case injury and death. In light of that reality, “how do we help the popular culture come to the very difficult task of facing the fact that what we are looking at is mass murder?” she asked.

Art for today: Sunrise in the mountains, oil on panel, 9x12 in.