341 Comments
User's avatar
Tonya's avatar

Is your view of good and evil, then, similar to that of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn?

"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either -- but right through every human heart -- and through all human hearts."

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I’m of the same opinion.

Tanner Brecheen's avatar

I agree with Sasha in that Fr Rippberger and other guys like Malichi Martin, Fr Carlos Martins and Fr Dan Rehil are extremely suspect. Through their own writings of books and via "christian" podcasters posing as doctrinal authorities, pop culture shows like the exorcist files... these priests are promoting/popularizing a cat and mouse dance view of exorcism which seems to obviously favor the demon. i have always had many ?s about these catholic teachings. Many of these "exorcists" anecdotes are so out there. for example: I hate the idea of a child possessed as a result of a curse from a jealous mistress...but then, I dont know what to make of most of catholic doctrine. Depending on who is speaking "authoritatively".. its all over the place. I think i do know that demons are real and would love to entrap you and i and our kids any way they can. If thats through a false system of control, which the catholic rite may or may not be(?) then in sure they'd be pleased to do that. To hand us a fake control mechanism which only serves to empower them and separate the would be Christ follower from their authority seems an obvious and under-discussed tactic in not just spiritual but all forms of warfare waged against us these days! I always listen to these stories with that in mind, and also with Jesus' teachings as a filter. I found it interesting to hear tDr Yeadon weigh in in disbelief of the demon. In my reading of the bible, and in my experience of them, the existence of the "demon" and its influence in no way removes culpability or hinders the free will of the human. I had already made the extension to the virus... when i read his little comment. I believe denial of their (demons and viruses) existence only serves to confuse and in the case of the virus, denial of its existence and creation/modification ie ferin cleavage or whatever the literal hell was done... to deny its existence serves to exonerate the evil humans who created it. As it sits, ive had experience of "viral" illness and i've had experience with supernatural demonic intelligences. Seen and heard. Im open to accepting "virus" as a misnomer, even as an un living toxin with a mechanism that i haven't the ability to reason, but i have suffered from it none the less... and quite physically i might add...as for the demon, im sure they are only too happy to have me pondering the semantics of their naming... so for me, demon does the job. Cheers and God bless you Mike and Sasha. I am thankful for your bravery in the face of tyranny regardless of any of my takes.- rereading the A.S. quote (which i too agree with) not sure how i deduced that Dr Yeadon does not believe in corporeal evil beings we call demons? Or Sasha for that matter? Would you mind a yes or no on that one? sorry and thanks :)

Roger's avatar

I dont know if I follow your argument but In the Tucker interview, the priest doesnt exonerate the possessed individual. Mostly by their evil choices it allowed the demon in and they have to make the choice to be exorcised, have it removed. And it is a major long term difficult process.

Tanner Brecheen's avatar

Hi Roger, well it seems you don’t follow my discussion, but thats probably my fault. Yes i appreciate that bit (demons dont negate will) of what i believe to be that particular priests mix of lies and truths shared with TC. I was discussing the role of demon in the context of what i thought i had gleaned about Sashas view of them per her article, but i probably got that wrong too. cheers.

Roger's avatar

And if such a state of demonic possession exists I would think it likely that demons would prefer people of power who we know have pathological tendencies to begin with, and have more power to do more evil to humankind than the powerless.

Roger's avatar

From Sasha my summary is she thinks that all evil is the deep state, cia, corporate actors, etc. I dont subscribe to that form of demonology either. There are other evil actors. Either way, if you believe in demons or not, you cant get away from personal responsibility for your evil actions whether you say the devil, a demon, my satanic masters or the cia made me do it.

The only way you could say for sure the priest was lying is if you were in the room with him. But my life experience tends to make me believe he was telling the truth. I dont think it absolves the individual actors at any level, to say that a (very) few of them might have demonic possession

Kaylene Emery's avatar

On principle I no longer watch Tucker or Fr R . I do believe in demons and also believe that they need our consent , and they can extract that via deception ( like they know any other way 🤣).

I believe in God the Father almighty and in Jesus Christ His only son ….

Your work is wonderful Sasha and your art is inspired. May God continue to bless you n yours.

🙏🙏🙏

jean's avatar

And my opinion also.

Roger's avatar

Yes, and sometimes that evil invites more evil, like possession, apparently.

John Reed's avatar

Not sometimes, always. It's known as the Theory of the Progression of Evil.

IKnewSinceMarch2020's avatar

Yes, so do I.

As a somewhat poor Buddhist practitioner, I do my “delivering from evil” by meditation, not prayer, but I don’t think they are that different; I think prayer done well is meditation and vice versa; I just personally find it easier to think in terms of learning the skill of listening to myself and the universe by meditation practices, than by outsourcing wishes to God to give me stuff (which is prayer done poorly, but I think how a lot of people pray).

I also really like what Sasha says about being neutral rather than being “kind” or “nice”. One of the problems I have with the Buddhists I practice with, without really being one of them is this over-niceness. They are still better than most people, but I find them far from “true”, far from courageous, far from willing to hold counter-narrative views. I occasionally tell them and I am never nice! When I am not telling them off I just try to work on myself. I do struggle with feeling superior to a lot of them though because I saw right through covid, right through climate change, right through wokeism and other victim-fascists.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

well, you described precisely why the Buddhist ideology (and Western interpretations of it) are problematic in my view. The performative over-niceness of the people you interact with is problematic. Largely to themselves at the beginning. They spend a lot of energy on that performance, literally their own ideas acquired from Buddhism tell them that they must be in that play, acting out those moves, and it distracts them from THE TRUTH (which is coherence with the objective reality!) that there is no need at all to spend that extra effort on acting our "I am a Buddhist I am zen ohm positive vibrations...", whatever else is put into their heads. Also, meditation is fine, but I never do it myself. It's not necessary for me, and it is another way to distract from the effort I make to stay in coherence with the objective reality, i.e. being always situationally aware.

WhitneyWebbIsMySpiritAnimal's avatar

Alan Watts called this spiritual one-upmanship, and directed very much attention to it in his promotion of zen practice & discussion of Buddhist societies. It's the "I'm more humble than you" problem.

One thing the 'encounter' schools of therapy had correct is that one can never escape being oneself, and that the full embrace of all emotional states (including anger and hate) are within the scope of being present & whole, and true to the Tao and part of being human.

Performative niceness & emotional suppression are problems for WASPs at least just as much as for Buddhists, if not every other branch of religious practice and therapy schools to greater or lesser degrees. Don't get me started on the Mormons. It's a very human problem that transcends doctrine or dogma.

Roger's avatar

I cant speak for the coherence to reality for other sects of Buddhism but the fundamental practice of Vipassana meditation (dhamma.org) is purely observing the _objective reality_, inside one's body (as opposed to out in the world), with no imagination involved.

Everyone's normal mental habit pattern is to react, mostly unconsciously to all the sensations arising therein. In Vipassana one learns to observe this _objective reality_ without reacting, pure observation which breaks the habits of reaction and removes the mental-emotional patterns associated with the sensations e.g. anger is associated with hot sensations that we normally react to.

This self-awareness is developed so eventually one can take it out into the world and be aware of negative reactions to sensations and associated emotions, so that one isnt overwhelmed by them. Or they stop arising altogether when the reaction pattern has been removed entirely.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

objective reality is not separable between inside and outside of the human body. No amount of navel gazing will get you in touch with it.

Roger's avatar

Maybe it is not separable to you. But if you focus on it you can be aware of the objective reality inside, including the emotions and sensations.

Should we call Prayer navel gazing? You are not doing anything productive. Is that really focusing on objective reality, having some imagination about yourself or the future.

Roger's avatar
Apr 7Edited

This has been a useful discussion for me. I now understand the fundamental mindset that differentiates Christians from Buddhists. Christians believe that the human mental-emotional condition is mostly fixed with little ability to evolve. You're only hope is to be a not so bad person, accept Christ as your savior and maybe you will go to heaven. Happy end of story. Otherwise you go to he11. Unhappy end of story.

The Buddhism mindset is that we have all these examples of fallible human beings (not gods in Theravadan Buddhism, at least) who during their lifetimes perfected themselves and became Buddhas, or Arahants (and talked of their former life times). So in this very lifetime we can also work on perfecting ourselves and maybe in this or a future lifetime we can also become a perfected being, an Arahant, and no longer need to reincarnate. Happy end of story. Otherwise we roll from lifetime to lifetime reincarnating endlessly, no end to story.

So your point of view is that all this talk of becoming a better person, perfecting yourself, is crap. Not possible.

And my point of view is that I have seen so many including myself fundamentally change their life in retreats and become much better human beings, come out of negativities, addictions, etc. so working on perfecting yourself is a worthwhile endeavor.

Some sects of Buddhism, primarily Tibetan & Mahayana, believe these perfected beings became gods or godlike and can be worshiped, prayed to for help. Theravada Buddhists do not, but we can look to their words for guidance for our own work for betterment.

Bottom line, neither one of us is going to convince the other on this fundamental view of ability or inability of humans to perfect or even improve themselves very much. But thanks for the discussion. .

Mtxjeqn's avatar

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. As I said previously, you are in deep delusion

Roger's avatar

Someone who accepts Sasha when she says that Buddhists dont believe there is evil, (which is monumental ignorance, that she walked back) Is telling me whats what. Please enlighten me.

Bird's Brain's avatar

It's interesting that you mention Buddhists and over-niceness versus genuineness. I notice this with many of what I call "loudly" Christian people. (I don't know a lot of Buddhists so can't use them as comparison.) They seem more interested in appearing nice than in being genuine. And it comes across as incredibly phoney. One wonders why this is the default position. But then, I'm particularly sensitive to genuineness and appreciate it far more than niceness. Genuineness is part of being true to ones self. And considering that it's the truth that sets us free, not "niceness," it seems a more Christian thing to be.

Roger's avatar

Who hasnt seen performative niceness in Christianity or any other religion too? How is this a Buddhist failing? Its a human failing.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

what gave you an idea that performative over-niceness is exclusively a Buddhist thing?

Roger's avatar

The woman whose message implied it, that I was responding to.

NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Have you read Merton?

Like, “Seven Story Mountain”?

Lynda Rimke's avatar

I too thought of that Solzhenitsyn quote while reading this. Deliver us all from evil, dear Lord, and help us all to find and do the next right and true thing. Thy Kingdom come starts with the domains of our own hearts.

Yeowoman's avatar

It's a billion times more complex tho tbh which is why we are in this mess. How many good hearted people buy products from 'evil' corporations every day , or have their pensions or welfare money invested in god knows what awfulness. Even the best intentioned people in the world may be doing far more harm than good. When you try to navigate this stuff consciously it's almost impossible, if not utterly so.

Philip Joseph's avatar

That all humans have the ability for good or for evil has been documented since creation. It is how individuals deal with the effects of life around them that leads to which force ascends, and not all people are created equal with equal abilities to deal with good or evil forces. Not all people are subjected to equal real world travails that shape their abilities and actions. It is a truth that people who allow themselves to succumb to their evil side coalesce with those others who do so, to rule over or destroy what they can of those who chose good, those who would be just left alone, until the evil becomes too great to ignore.

No One Knows's avatar

to have a better world we need to have better people

Stephen Williams's avatar

Nearly all of us are better people. We are under the yoke of a tiny oppressive elite class of pure evil who employ CIA and military and usury et al to keep us down. We are inured to it except those waking up which is prob most here.

Some people think we are on a prison planet and that's just the way it is but I believe we can have heaven on earth if we rid ourselves of all the elite scum satanists. i.e. we can then be who we are meant to be, unrestrained in our creativity and empathy for our fellow humans and the natural world.

Thy kingdom come,

Thy will be done,

on earth as it is in heaven.

Renate Lindeman's avatar

Great piece, thanks. As a sheep farmer starting with a heritage and vax free herd 6 years ago, we never lost an animal, other than during lambing or age. We made the mistake of buying 4 lambs from a farming veterinarian 3 years ago. Vaxxed obviously. Of the 2 rams, 1 died suddenly in the field. Of the 2 ewes, one was unable to get pregnant.

NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Sounds anecdotal, not proof, just a series of Covidcidences

Seriously though- good on you for your good husbandry, sorry for the jab losses

LadyM's avatar

Thank you for such a thoughtful article using a discussion between two people whose agenda you don't trust and with whom you don't agree, to illustrate your own ideas by contrast.

I am several years older than you, was born in the former Soviet Union and lived in Poland and Israel for a few years before coming to the US as a young child. My parents lost most of their family and survived horrifying abuse before escaping to the relative freedom and opportunity of the US,

My faith in "humanity" has never been great but the events of the last few years have challenged even that reality. I was shocked at how easily the vast majority of humanity went along with a questionable agenda, "invested" leaders and an illogical protocol, even considering low standards. I am concerned that most have still not learned much from what occurred and would be prepared to repeat the same actions.

I agree that our "collective unconscious" is made up of the totality of all our receptions and emanations and that we are each responsible for our part of the mix because we are free-willed animals with a sense of wonder about our own existence in an infinite field of knowledge. I hope that may serve to temper some of our individual and collective arrogance and and possibly make us less self-destructive eventually.

Catherine Andrews's avatar

..."we are free-willed animals with a sense of wonder about our own existence in an infinite field of knowledge." What a lovely and powerful truth! Thank you, LadyM.

Sandy K's avatar

"...defying faith in God by equating people with programmable computing devices." As a scientist, I agree with that statement. "The Science"™️ wants easily controllable stupid automatons, not creative, intelligent, intuitive, compassion fully human Humans.🙏

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

As a scientist you should know that 99% of processes in the body are automated. Do you have general difficulties crossing the road in general?

Sasha Latypova's avatar

autonomic body functions are not automated.

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

They are largely automated with a lot of complexity and interactivity. The body has its own inate intelligence. Has different control centres (such as heart sending more signals to the brain than the brain to the heart?), some call it chakras. Your gut is also largely autonomous and continues to process food even when you sleep, no input needed. If your body is in balance, you can leave the body to pilot itself pretty much, just provide good terrain both internally and externally. Why is this so difficult for you, Sasha?

Sasha Latypova's avatar

why is it so difficult for you to answer - what is the "code"? How does it work?

How to you know that the heart is "sending signals" to the brain? Can you point to literature where that's proven, definitively?

You have a narrative idea of "computer program" which is incredibly naive, but nothing tangible to back it up. That's my point.

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

I just told you, there's information in the field that gets transferred at conception with an observable flash of light. You asking the same question won't change that. We don't know what it is. It's a field and it carries some kind of information that gets transmitted or embedded in the individual AT CONCEPTION.

But again, I'll stop myself here. I'm talking to someone who thinks the moon is made of cheese plastered over the dome, which was created by God as a fishtank for us to swim in. 👍

Sasha Latypova's avatar

information is not a code, nor is it a program. You provided no back up for your naive CompSci assertions.

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

I just told you, there's information in the field that gets transferred at conception with an observable flash of light. You asking the same question won't change that. We don't know what it is. It's a field and it carries some kind of information that gets transmitted or embedded in the individual AT CONCEPTION.

But again, I'll stop myself here. I'm talking to someone who thinks the moon is made of cheese plastered over the dome, which was created by God as a fishtank for us to swim in. 👍

Ron's avatar

I bet you believe we have walked on the moon. Because they told you so, and now you know. You sir, are very observable.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Hello Ivaylo Grigorov. Erm... "Automated" implies pre-programmed expression, whilst autoimmune function is essentially interactive. Therein lies the rub - so to speak...

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

I will have to agree with this statement.

Bird's Brain's avatar

Automated and autonomic are very different though. Automated systems follow a set of pre-defined instructions. Autonomic systems are self-managing and adaptive. The former is fixed or static, the latter dynamic and flexible. Automation is about instructions versus autonomics which is about outcomes and self-regulation.

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

Is an Autopilot of a plane Automatic or Autonomic? It certainly pilots the plane. You're arguing about semantics, rather than focus on the real issue which is that the human body governs it's internal machinery largely by itself. You, as a soul inside a container, have control only over skeletal muscles. You can even change your heart rate purposefully.

So instead of grasping for straws and arguing about semantics, agree with me instead that 99% of bodily function are conducted without 'your' conscientious input.

Bird's Brain's avatar

"Semantics," as you call the difference between automated and autonomic, are important because words matter. They guide our understanding of the world and are at the base of our belief systems. That's why people are responding to your off-hand comment. In a world where there are powers that seem to want to automate everything, including human beings, people should not be fooled into believing that we are like machines, which is what we "hack" and "automate." We are not. We are beautifully created, adaptable, biological creatures with brains complex enough to, as you say, run many bodily functions without our conscious input. But thanks to those same brains, we are also able to consciously change many of our body's functions. And that's the difference - a difference that matters.

Changing our diets changes how almost everything in our body functions via a cascade effect. For example, a high fat diet increases the acidity level in our bodies where a diet high in leafy greens and other vegetables is alkaline. This change in chemistry impacts everything in our bodies. Fat also thickens our blood, making our hearts work harder to pump blood and our livers and adrenal glands work harder to deal with that situation. The adrenaline released to thin our blood increases our heart rate further. Purposefully exercising changes everything from our breathing to, eventually our muscle tone, stamina and response to stress.

That's just a few of the ways we can consciously control more than our muscles and heart rate.

I don't agree with you because your statement about bodily functions conducted without "conscientious" input only tells half the story. And it's the other half that makes us human.

Ivaylo Grigorov's avatar

Fat makes blood thick, wow this is not even worth engaging with....

Bird's Brain's avatar

I agree, so will call it a day and wish you a pleasant evening

nymusicdaily's avatar

this interview seems to have been devised to gauge the potential reaction to project blue beam. very real beam weapons disguised as sketchy ill-defined supernatural beings. we really need discernment here.

edit: https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/sign-of-the-times-hyper-realistic

Sasha Latypova's avatar

yes, I agree, they are testing the waters for the blue beam/aliens scenario

Stephen Williams's avatar

Is Blue Beam where they will have "aliens" do away with 7.5 billion of us then the cavalry will come in at the last minute to save the rest to work as slaves?

nymusicdaily's avatar

that seems to be the plan

Former UK resident's avatar

The Vatican is promoting cyber Satanism at the mo.

Besides they are renowned to endlessly manufacture fake Messiahs...

The Outlaw's avatar

The actual prayer is "Deliver Us From The Evil One.". It has been altered. Satan is real and is worshipped by certain individuals.

"I am not a scholar,"--Non-Sense. A Sheepskin does not bestow this honor.

Yes, I celebrate Easter next Sunday,

Operation AIPAC Fury.

God Bless.

Stephen Williams's avatar

AIPAC Fury.....very good, very apt

WhitneyWebbIsMySpiritAnimal's avatar

Fr. Chad's expertise sure does conveniently avoid & distract from the Vatican's 3rd Rail of its own 'demon possession', exposed so thoroughly (and in its own voice) by Frederic Martel:

https://fredericmartel.com/en/books/in-the-closet-of-the-vatican/

Whatever Christ's virtues may have been or continue to be, the Church sure does a pretty consistent job of either getting its acolytes to look outside/elsewhere for the presence of evil, rather than inside, or else replacing forgiveness of the self (once one's own dubious nature is observed) with shame. Both are control strategies, not liberation strategies.

Both Atheists/agnostics & the faithful would do well to grapple with the analogic nature of language, particularly transcendental poetic language, and the inherence of metaphor to all linguistic expressions. The 'Demons/Angels' archetypes are personifications, just as any deification is. Mistaking the figuration for the principle it represents is the definition of idolatry.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

+100 likes. Thank you for observing the concept that "archetypes" are internal

personifications or Psycho prompts. Not physical entities. Well said.

Bonita's avatar

I'm really struggling with taking my time to listen to the Tucker Carlson interview. I'm confident your review of the interview is very thorough and pointing out points that I would have missed; not to mention, your great sense of humor makes the information so much easier to take. Thank you for sharing your perspective.

Jack Jones's avatar

Yeah, I too enjoy Sasha's penchant for the occasional dollops of satire that get thrown in.

Roger's avatar

I agree. Great Tucker interview. You just get a good vibe from this Priest. No huge ego trying to impress or scare people unnecessarily. Very matter of fact. Watch it and make up your own mind.

Craig B's avatar

Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life, no man comes to the Father but by Me." A good place to start when attempting to describe realities beyond our five senses. The alternative is the opinions of 8 billion people who have never been beyond the universe or the 3-4 dimensions of their existence, who don't know what's in their neighbor's garage and can't remember where they put their slippers.

Timothy Paul's avatar

"Are these people really human?" You ask.... Yes, they are, given the biblical understanding of what human means. "Human" is not analogous to "person", but rather, related to the spiritual condition of man after exiting the Garden at Eden, innocence lost, eyes wide open, "as gods, knowing good and evil".

"Hu" is the Egyptian god for sensuality and soulish creation.Sensuality is the weapon used to enslave mankind. It makes etymological sense that the word "human" would described the fallen condition of man, very different from the original design.

Fast-forward into Pauls Epistles, where he describes the new creature that is the Body of Christ, restored back to its original design and then exalted into heavenly role. Not at all human. Better.

Thus, we are called to abandon our humanity. Exactly opposite to what culture says about this topic. All the lies gathered into one place.

Karla M LaZier's avatar

Many years ago shame and guilt were my defaults - if something happened it must be my fault leading to perpetual feelings of guilt about the matter- I never measured up, I was always scrupulously examining my conscience- practically OCD about it, being told this or that was a sin from a very early age, attending church schools for 12 years for more indoctrination-and I internalized these teachings until I didn’t. At age 13 being told thus and such was a sin and in this case a mortal sin I said to myself - wait a minute no one should be able to define that a certain action is a mortal sin; one in which if you die with it on your soul you will go to hell per the ever merciful cc. Much research- independently of course, because there was no safe sharing of ‘heresy’ in my ‘religious’ family whose mantra was just do it or sit down, shut up and behave! or amongst our friends - they too, I believed thought like I did - inculcated by the legalistic, over control of the Catholic Church - ( AI overrides my ability to make this reference to the cc in lower case illustrating their overriding control even today via AI) the rules laid out - in black and white. Well research revealed that no one could define what I did as ‘sin’ unless in conscience I believed it was a sin. Freedom at last - not to’ ‘sin’ but to be a free thinker and able to make informed decisions based on my own rational thought.

Post Covid we wonder why people just went along - well they didn’t for the most part but if they did many were influenced by the upbringing I just outlined as normative in the 5O’s and 60’s and into the seventies - then Vatican II restructured some of the rigid thinking bringing us to the present where the cc is a card carrying member of the WEF, runs a criminal banking cartel and endorses the Covid vaccine - a truly godless organization. Read Paul L.Williams exposing the church -Paul a disaffected theologian tells the truth in his multiple well researched books.

Emancipation - I have always been a moral individual and by breaking with the cc I freed myself from a life of false beliefs designed to limit my own agency in making informed decisions. It was not an overnight process - intense brain washing begun in childhood is hard to dispel but I kept at it, somethings resolved quickly others, old untrue beliefs lingered but became just shadow formations- still there but not controlling my rational abilities and belief in my own world view and agency.

My reason for telling this tale is to illustrate that mass beliefs as in demonic possession/s and defining demons as so powerful that they reduce one’s agency are used as a system of control by the cc. I believe the cc uses this systemic delusion to manipulate their members and to inculcate fear in them and others. Be careful of unctuous people like gee golly Tucker and the exorcist performing priest who come into our lives at times of darkness in the world. Live your best life and focus on raising moral children without coercion. Question everything and do not act or believe without forthought.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

Thank you! I agree with your position. I don't want to generalize too much, but my criticism of the churches as organized religion (and their controlling practices spread into parenting) is largely the same. These are corruptible people who are using spiritual matter as a tool of organizational or parental oppression. That's why most people got turned off from religion, because they blame Christianity, for example for what their parents did or the corrupt priests did.

Rob S.'s avatar

Then why do you even spend two seconds on this religious shit? Especially after Covid, during which ALL major churches not only did not oppose the criminality, but wholeheartedly supported it by telling their minions to get the shots? You, of all people, being the standard bearer in the battle against the Covid criminality, should be pointing this out at every opportunity.

Why do you pay so much attention to the many losers in your comments section with their endless "blessings" and Jesus and bible references? You're a multi-millionaire with houses in at least three states, that I know of, so whatever few dollars these losers contribute to your Kofi account can't possibly make any difference to you.

Why do you pay lip service to these worthless fucks? Call them what they are - useless, worthless fucks who head for the hills at the first sign of having to stand for anything and who proclaim that the Baby Fucking Jesus will solve their worldy problems. For once, give them a reality check and tell them to go fuck their mothers.

I'm sorry for the language, Sasha, and I hope it gives you a laugh, as it does me. But seriously, I know you have a European mentality in regard to religion, as do I. To us, religion is the origin of a few morality tales, nothing more. We do not take these things literally, as do these American, bible-thumping trailer trash losers.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

I am not spending any time on "religious shit", you are doing that, literally. And I am not sure why, maybe some childhood trauma you haven't processed, but it's not my department. Also, I don't have houses in 3 states, only 2 that I know of. Why are you so convinced that I should work 20 hrs a day for free, that's what I wonder? Who appointed you to decide on my behalf what my labor is worth? Instead of spending your day trying to count money in my bank account, you should try to figure out why normal conversations between other people send you into a bout of verbal diarrhea of some very foul language?

PS. please refrain from using "us", I have no part in your very nasty attitude and disgusting language. This is a formal warning.

Sam's avatar
Apr 6Edited

Seems like we are all trying to understand the true nature of this reality through different lenses.

Nobody knows the answer. I'm agnostic - but do try to look at things from various angles.

Are there aliens or demons? No clue. Having said that, covid op was perhaps the biggest wake up call for me and made me wonder about the true nature of this reality the most, as I observed the zombification of people whom I thought I knew all around me in real time.

I think we all know that something has gone terribly wrong. I keep thinking that introduction of internet into the public sphere was the date when things started to go sideways.

My investigation continues.

Jeannon Kralj's avatar

Did not yet read this full posting but will later doday. I saw the term :fully human" and started looking for one my very old postings regarding eugenics and abortion and found it, from over ten years ago.

______

Those who try to promote the idea that Hitler was basically a nice guy do great harm to any people who are honestly trying to fully explore how the Jews use and manipulate our reality including what happened or did not happen in NAZI Germany.

Hitler was just as much of a monster and beast as was Lenin, Stalin, and Mao.

These people all have one thing in common, their total disregard for the rights and dignity of human beings. Human beings are living beings with souls from the moment of conception.

Hitler and about 50 of his "doctors" systematically murdered about 250,000 people in Germany totally separate from the supposed "6 million" eliminated in the camps. These included children and adults born with genetic birth defects, the mentally ill, political prisoners, Gypsies, the handicapped, those too ill to work, Jehovah's Witnesses, homosexuals, Afro-Europeans, and Soviet and Polish prisoners-of-war.

The targets for extermination were objectified as "beings of lesser worth," "life unworthy of life," "ballast existences," "useless eaters."

The main methods were lethal injections for starvation. Some were used for experimentation to better the Aryan one race. They especially loved using twins and Dr. Mengela carried over the twin experiments into South America.

Granted Hitler learned all he knew about eugenics methods from USA's Margaret Sanger and like scum, nevertheless, he was able in the atheist milieu of Germany to carry out eugenics practices to the max.

Forced sterilization of the mentally ill or retarded people was done in the USA and Germany continuing up through the 1960s in both countries.

When we talk about Hitler and eugenics, we are talking about pure Satanic Evil so please stop all this "Hitler was basically a nice guy" garbage. ""

helping hands's avatar

"You're a better man than me Gunga Din" for suffering through that entire conversation.

I tried last week and couldn't get past the first 10 minutes.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

IDK, I found it entertaining. Although I don't watch podcasts, generally.

Suzy Cue's avatar

Sasha, I love your closing paragraph (starting with “the best cure is prevention”. It’s an excellent summary. Related to this, I just read Coffee & Covid’s post praising all the recent AI-fueled ‘health cures’, with no mention whatsoever about prevention.

Sasha Latypova's avatar

I lost all respect for Coffee & Covid a while ago.

AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Maybe Clusterfuck Nation is better.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 6
Comment deleted
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

At Clusterfuck Nation it's BNSS.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 6
Comment deleted
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

I accidentally omitted the D. BNDSS: Bibi Netanyahu Deranged Support Syndrome.

Bigodog's avatar

100%. Yesterday I could no longer tolerate his posts as the AI directed mrna cancer treatment ad unsubscribed.