Sachs is currently making media circles in the “freedom-adjacent” space. However, his job as a Director of a Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University entails promoting globalist fairy tales of “viral pan…

Read more

Recently sacked former head of FDA CBER, Peter Marks has issued veiled threats about deploying biological weapons. You can read about it here, Nicolas did a good job summarizing Peter’s bioterrorism threats:

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

BREAKING - Peter Marks Issues Veiled Threat to America About Man-Made Biological Threats

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH…

Read more

a year ago · 250 likes · 134 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Despite popular fear-based beliefs to the contrary, Pe…

Read more

I told you so back in September when bullshit MAHA policy [aka Anything But Vaccines] drafted by the Means f…

Read more

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

BREAKING - Peter Marks Issues Veiled Threat to America About Man-Made Biological Threats

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH…

Read more

a year ago · 250 likes · 134 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Despite popular fear-based beliefs to the contrary, Peter is rattling an imaginary weapon.

Read more

Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake

Another Ralph Baric Lecture

Author’s Note: This is my second post in a series about the lectures and papers of UNC professor Ralph Baric. As I mentioned in my first post, Ralph Baric: The JS Bach of Viral Genetic Engineering, Professor Baric has—through extraordinary focus over a thirty year period—become the preeminent authority on coronaviruses and genetically altering them. My …

Read more

2 years ago · 48 likes · 17 comments · John Leake

At the time many of us gave Peter McCullough and John Leake grief for comparing Ralph Baric to the musical genius Johan Sebastian Bach. I am now going to commit a similar crime, but I will offer wha…

Read more

Read more

Read more

Gain-of-function Research

Escaped Monkeys Stoke Fears of Disease Spread, Lax Security at Research Labs

Four monkeys remain at large after 43 escaped earlier this month from the Alpha Genesis Primate Research Center in South Carolina. The lab, which has received over $109 …

Read more

The White House has recently issued and updated “dual use research of concern” (DURC) policy.

Definitions:

Read more

I often get into arguments about “weaponized gain-of-function (GOF) viruses”. I am going to provide my working definition of this concept, so that we are on the same page for the purposes of this discussion. “Weaponized virus” is the idea that someone can design and make a new virus that, if released from the lab, can transmit by air or casual contact human-to-human and infect a substantial % of the population of the world (e.g. >10% or >800M people in all regions of the world simultaneously) while causing severe illness and millions of deaths.

In government parlance, the allegedly pandemic-causing pathogens are called “select agents”, as they are subject to all sorts of biosecurity fears and regulation. There is a listing of presumed naturally occurring select agents maintained by the HHS and the USDA:

Under United States law, Biological select agents or toxins (BSATs)—or simply select agents for short—are bio-agents which (since 1997^[1]) have been declared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to have the "potential to pose a severe threat to public health and safety". The agents are divided into (1) HHS select agents and toxins affecting humans; (2) USDA select agents and toxins affecting agriculture; and (3) overlap select agents and toxins affecting both.

The problem with the select agents - they are not scary enough! You see, they can’t be used for real bioterrorism. For one, it’s mostly illegal to work with them under international law. The samples, if they exist, are allegedly locked up in just a few government facilities. Almost nobody is allowed to work with them, so the facilities, labs and expertise are very limited. Collecting, storing and deploying natural pathogens in quantities that could produce any noticeable biological attack is not feasible. Once released, these things quickly denature. Even if some infections occur, they quickly attenuate into nothing and self-extinguish.

On the other hand, we have the idea of novel, man-made, chimeric, engineered, GOF weaponized bioterrorism agents that are not on this list because they don’t exist in nature but, as the GOF narrative claims, can be potentially invented by evil scientists. This makes a very effective scary story. Secret, unknown, invisible, deadly pathogens ready to pounce from a lab at any moment! “Worse than nuclear weapons!” (Rand Paul and many other purveyors of weaponized virus fearporn).

I have stated in the past that it is not possible to manufacture pandemic-causing pathogens with existing state of tech and science.

I will highlight some of the scientific and technical challenges in this article which boil down to:

1. Viral transmissible causes of mass illness is a false biological theory.

2. Even if we assume that viruses can cause mass illness, i.e. that the viral theory is correct, the science dogma safely prevents any progress toward solving the technical challenges of making such agents.

This book was published in 2010 by the National Research Council of the National Academies:

By some very learned authors:

The objectives of this scientific and technical committee:

In other words, the task of this committee was to determine if the current state of technology allows for making novel, transmissible, pandemic causing pathogens in a lab. If the answer to artificially making new, not yet listed or known to science pathogens is “yes”, then the committee was supposed to propose a system to classify such novel agents based on their genetic makeup.

Here are the categories of “pandemic pathogens” that the biodefense industry is concerned with (BTRA = bioterrorism agents):

Quoting from the summary, the report states that currently and in the foreseeable future there is no technical ability to predict functions of the pathogen from a new genetic sequence. Therefore, there is no possibility to construct a system/database that would categorize the agents into increasingly restricted classes based on their so-called “genetic code” (which doesn’t code, but you must think in terms of computer analogies that are pushed on you by the likes of Bill Gates, regardless):

[1] For example, one microorganism may be highly virulent, but poorly transmissible from person to person, whereas another agent may spread easily, but produce only mild illness

Oh! So here, nonchalantly, we have an admission that the science of genetics has failed. Right?

The book also accidentally acknowledges that the viral theory of disease is a failure:

Despite admitting that genetics and virology are both failed theories, the authors insist on using genetics and virology. They state that to solve the problem of predicting protein function from its genetic structure, the following major issues in science must be solved:

• Protein structure and function;

• Gene expression and regulation;

• Pathogenic mechanisms;

• Animal models of disease;

• Data and information management for systems biology;

• Synthetic biology;

• Metagenomics and phylogenomic, including the human microbiome.

If only we solve the genetic code thingy (that doesn’t code), and then figure out the “pathogenic mechanisms” (meaning, what actually causes illness? wait, so it’s NOT viruses???) and “synthetic biology” (you are saying you CAN’T make biology synthetically today???)…

What about designing new pathogenic viruses in labs?

In further admission that genetic theory is bunk, the report states that nobody can predict pathogenicity or transmissibility from a genomic sequence:

Furthermore, nobody can predict whether a vaccine will work for any “novel” virus:

On the question of designing viruses de-novo (these new, chimeric, weaponized, GOF things that are worse than nukes…) the report is unequivocal - that is not possible!

Quick, someone please inform Rand Paul, that he doesn’t need to make a new regulatory agency with Rick Bright and Bob Malone in charge to regulate the weaponized viruses after all…

“Alternative approaches”, whatever they are, also fail:

The report states that progress has come mostly from the growing database of experimentally determined structures (the Protein Data Bank contains over 60,000; http://www.rcsb.org/pdb), which enable the modeling of new sequences on the basis of homology to known, related structures. Homology modeling can occasionally predict structure and function based on previously obtained experimental models, but not consistently and not for anything very new or different from existing data.

In summary, the yet unsolved technical barriers to making new chimeric pandemic causing viruses in the lab include:

• Accurate prediction of protein structure and function;

• Accurate understanding, prediction and implementation of protein-protein interactions within a host cell (orders of magnitude greater complexity vs a lab designed “virus”).

Ok, but you might say with enough effort and money these technical challenges will be solved, or maybe already secretly solved.

Let’s look at the protein structure problem.

The molecules are structures in a 3D space (or 4D including time). Proteins are very large molecules made of polypeptide chains that twist and fold into complex 3D forms. Molecular structures are stable, because they are believed to be “minimum energy” structures.

Let’s stop right here. Where does the notion of “minimum energy” come from? Well, of course, that’s the product of using the Newtonian model of physics and applying it, inappropriately I must add, to biology. You may say - but there is no other model to use! And you would be correct. That is because all other models have been eliminated from the field a long time ago. If you don’t affirm the great Sir Isaac, you are not going to get funding for your research grant. You would also have to invent many things from scratch, as there isn’t any other physical theory with well developed mathematical toolkit for you to use. However, few scientists ever stop to consider that the Newtonian model of physics is merely a model, and it includes substantial simplifications. For example, calculations using the term “energy” are simplifications from the original ones based on “force”, and this simplification completely removes any ability to distinguish physical causes from effects, leading to purely statistical description of the world (including our focus, the proteins).

So, as there is no other model to use in biology, we are left with making an assumption that the molecules prefer the state of “minimum-energy”, i.e. thermodynamic equilibrium. There can be numerous other causes and drivers of the molecular structures, but we will have to assume the minimum-energy hypothesis as it’s simply the only model we are allowed to use in modern science.

In case of small molecules, it is a more or less workable model as their structures are simple (e.g., H2O or CO2 - even though that’s also an over-simplification, because H2O has many physical states). However the problem of predicting the “minimum-energy structure” for a large protein remains unsolved in science.

Here is a quote from Rupert Sheldrake’s “Science Set Free” (2010):

Calculations to predict the three-dimensional structures of proteins give far too many solutions… known as the “multiple-minimum problem”.

Each protein, when folding, must “examine” numerous pathways to reach that theoretical minimum-energy state. However, not so easy - it turns out that for an average protein, the number of these pathways is such that it would take approximately 10^26 years (!!!) to examine all possible conformations. It is currently believed that the age of the universe is 10^9 years.

The minimum-energy hypothesis fails from the start because there are multiple conformations that a protein can assume with the same minimum energy. Yet, all natural proteins fold into their own unique shape/assume their own unique path within minutes. How do they figure this out? Nobody knows. The Newtonian/standard model-based physics/chemistry cannot explain how.

So, what do we do when a scientific hypothesis fails? We search for another hypothesis, right?

WRONG.

The correct answer is - we codify the failure into dogma and award it the Nobel Prize!

Sheldrake points to Christian Anfinsen:

… Christian Anfinsen, who won the Nobel Prize for work in protein folding, put it thus: “If the chain explored all possible configurations at random… it would take too long to reach the native [correct] configuration.

Anfinsen’s dogma states the following:

Anfinsen's dogma, also known as the thermodynamic hypothesis, is a postulate in molecular biology. It states that, at least for a small globular protein in its standard physiological environment, the native structure is determined only by the protein's amino acid sequence.^[1]

In fact, Anfinsen’s dogma hard-coded not one, but two false hypotheses into the entire molecular biology field since 1970s: the notion that protein’s structure is determined ONLY by it’s molecular sequence, and that the structure is found via the minimum-energy state. Clearly both of these ideas are wrong. There is no evidence that the molecular structure is the cause of the shape of the protein: there can be numerous other causes, and the molecular sequence can be the effect of the shape just as likely as the cause of it (simplified Newtonian physics can’t distinguish causes from effects).

And, as we already know, there are too many minimum-energy states for each protein. The ultimate low-energy conformation is not the only possible one. It remains an unsolved mystery how and why “the one” protein conformation is arrived at, and how it happens with remarkable precision, speed and reproducibility in nature, every single time. Energy state alone (Newtonian hypothesis) cannot select between these alternative possibilities and determine the specific structure taken up by the system.

Do you also see why it is not possible to solve the protein folding issue that you would need to solve to actually make pandemic causing viruses in a lab?

That’s why I sound so confident when I say this is not possible to do. I am feeling safe and secure knowing these asshats are safely and securely fenced into their viral theory + DNA/RNA+ the “minimum energy” $cience dogma. There is a silver lining to this whole mess…

We haven’t even touched on the protein-protein interactions within the cell. Recall that the complexity is orders of magnitude greater than that of the protein folding. So, that’s not going to be solved any time soon.

You can also see why the AI won’t solve this problem either. That’s because the AI models are going to assume the Newtonian-Anfinsen’s (wrong!) principles for protein folding and will try to solve the 10^26 years of the folding pathways, and even with all the nuclear power powering all the datacenters in the world, they will still not be able to find why the protein decided to fold along a particular low-energy pathway. Right on cue, the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 2024 was awarded for AI software that “predicts protein structures”. Except it doesn’t. I will address this in more detail in the future posts.

In conclusion if you “settle” the science by ramming through failed ideas, dogmatizing them, awarding them Nobel Prizes and censoring/defunding any alternative ideas - good news! you can’t make any scientific progress to whatever goals, including making of GOF viruses in the lab.

Art for today: Hoopoe, oil on panel, 9x12 in.

Anne Wojcicki, late Susan Wojcicki’s sister, ex-wife of Sergei Brin, who is ex-husband of Nicole Shanahan, who is RFK Jr’s VP pick. It’s not complicated at all.

According to the Endpoint News:

In what feels like …

Read more

A Big Government solution to any problem is to throw more taxpayers’ money to the same people who are responsible for the problem in the first place. Rand Paul yelled at Fauci in Congress so many times that he developed a dangerous variant of the Stockholm syndrome. He now zealously recites the Gain-of-Function-Gospel-of-Fauci (GOF-GOF) - namely, that deadly and very transmissible viruses will be made by rogue scientists in labs. They are going to be as world-ending as nuclear weapons!! Any minute now… Ignore the fact that the same fear mongering narrative line has been used by the Big Gov/Big Academia/DOD since the 1950’s for same purposes with the same rate of technical success. Yes, many injectable, consumable and aerosolized poisons exist. Poisoning as weapon has been around for millennia, but no transmissible pandemic-causing viruses have been made in labs, despite trillions pouring into this activity for a long time. It is an extremely lucrative endeavor for the Pandemic Preparedness Racket and the Cult of Biodefense. We must stop them, says brave Rand! By “stop them”, he means give them more money, and a brand new regulatory agency, ahem, a “convention”. His solution is the Big Government must do more Big Independent Over$$$ight!

Let me assure you, that I am absolutely 100% for terminating any lab and biomanufacturing activity that can be characterized as GOF or GOF-GOF. Examples of what I consider to be bioweapons development activities that should be stopped are in this post. My proposed policy would be to remove all vaccination requirements, strip the CDC and HHS of its unconstitutional powers, cut all NIH/DOD funding to the “infectious disease research”, fire every one of these useless eaters, take down the buildings and rewild the space with forests, so that the m*f*kers can never come back. This way we will also achieve the green sustainability objectives!

But what do I know? I am not a fake-conservative Senator doing fantasy cosplay of GOF-GOF that is “worse than nuclear weapons” in order to build another toll-booth and grab some more monopoly power for the administrative state…

Let’s explore the proposed legislation discussed by Rand Paul on a recent episode of RFK Jr.'s podcast.

Art for today: Sketch from Kyoto, watercolor, 9x12 in.

Read more

The Rolling Stone article highlighted one of the particularly gruesome animal experiments that Vance’s company, AplifyBio was involved in - injecting new “chimeric Nipah-virus vaccine” directly into the brains of mice, hamsters and monkeys. I decided to investigate what scientific inquiry justified this insane level of animal cruelty?

Just to be upfront about this issue: I am in principle not against studying toxicity of medicines in animals before human testing. The main reason for animal studies is to avoid harm to humans, especially to the volunteers in clinical trials. The goal of animal research is to characterize and exclude major risks before a drug can be studied in well controlled clinical trials. However, ethical considerations apply to animals, too. We are not allowed to torture them unnecessarily, nor use their tissues for designing substances primarily aimed at harming people, such as biological or chemical weapons. For non-human primate research, a study must be signed off by an animal review board (yes, most of these are captured by the same institutions that captured all other scientific research, but still).

To be upfront about another massive anxiety in the “freedom community”: I will be using the word “virus” throughout this article. Mostly with a lot of sarcasm. This is not an endorsement of virology (which is a junk science). I am simply showing what these people do (and what Vance invests in). While virology is a fake science, the biological and chemical poisons are very real and can be made in labs. Synthetic molecules that mimic naturally occurring toxins have always been around, many of them are in your medicine or utility cabinet right now. The biologics are large chemical molecules that mimic aspects of bacterial toxins and other toxins derived by poisoning of animal tissues (e.g. brain). They do not self-spread and don’t cause epidemics or pandemics, but can be involved in a localized poisoning incident (usually in the same labs that work on them). The reason I am spending so much time on this point is that I am tired of the obtuse “virus-no-isolated” trolls that swarm the comment space triggered by the word “virus”, start posting links to Sam Bailey and in general behave like lunatics. I typically tell them to fk off. Synthetic biology is a metaphor, but synthetic chemistry is real. I want you to understand what is really going on in these “biolabs”, so that they can’t scare you with “self-spreading bioweapons” and “pandemic preparedness” BS.

The study in question was conduced by several contractors including AmplifyBio and was funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) via Batelle Institute, and the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). The paper was published in PLOS Pathogens.

The study substance:

It is described as a “chimeric vaccine (PHV02) composed of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing the envelope glycoproteins of both Ebola virus (EBOV) and NiV. PHV02 is identical in construction to the registered Ebola vaccine (Ervebo) with the addition of the NiV G gene”:

What this means is they added the “Nipah virus gene” (whatever that is, i.e. a large synthetic chemical sequence designed on a computer and constructed by cDNA cloning) to the Merck Ebola vaccine that is on he market under EUA/PREP Act. In reality, there is absolutely no way to tell what’s ultimately in this substance. What we know for sure, it’s toxic, and probably causes poisoning presenting with features of the Ebola disease at sufficient exposure. So, now this new combo causes both types of poisoning, a hemorrhagic fever and neurological damage/encephalitis associated with what is claimed to be the “Nipah virus”.

The authors refer to the same substance (PHV02) as both a “vaccine” and a “virus”. The toxic brew is declared to be based on a “live, replication competent viral vector”, and they also admit it falls into the genetically modified organism (GMO) classification. The authors are saying this is ok, because everybody is doing it already:

There are now several vaccines approved for human use based on live, replication competent recombinant viral vectors, including rVSV-EBOV (Ervebo) [5,6], recombinant yellow fever (YF) 17D-dengue (Dengvaxia) [7], and YF 17D-Japanese encephalitis (ImoJev) [8], and development of other viral vectors remains an area of wide research interest [9–20]. In all cases, a challenge for vaccine development is to confirm safety of a novel genetically modified organism (GMO) having virulence, tropism, and persistence characteristics derived from both the parental virus and the incorporated transgene(s).

Does Ebola-Nipah chimeric virus exist in nature? No. Well, who cares. Dr. Vance’s team is making it in monkeys.

Curiously, despite having “live replicating Ebola-Nipah pathogen” in their hands, the work is done in a standard biosafety environment, no mention of a BSL3 or BSL4 is made, yet the authors claim they made a dangerous novel 3-headed pathogen. This is convenient material for bioweapons fear-porn acolytes to later point to and screech that if this dangerous research “leaks”, it will be worse than a nuclear holocaust (Rand Paul on RFK Jr podcast. I will address this in another article shortly). In any case, while Vance’s lab is working on this near-nuke, they don’t seem to worry about the explosion…

One thing I would like to know - how does this NOT violate the Biological Weapons Convention? Oh, silly me, I forgot! When the production is advertised as “vaccine development”, it is ok to manufacture the super-duper “Ebola-Nipah live replicating GMO viruses” in labs. It is especially ok, since these viruses are “rescues” by the NIH (like your adopted dog or cat from the animal shelter):

The authors are especially grateful to Drs. Emmie de Wit and Heinz Feldmann, Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH for providing the rescued rVSVΔG-EBOV GP-NiV G and rVSVΔG-NiV F/G viruses and supporting documentation.

Notice, this happened NOT in China, and NOT in Ukraine, but right here at home, in Ohio, Texas and DC! And, you won’t believe this, but the CIA-DOD-Scott Gottlieb’s baby, National Resilience, is the place where these “vaccines/viruses” were manufactured:

The team at Ology Bio Inc (now a subsidiary of National Resilience Inc.) under the leadership of Dr. Sara Terpening, manufactured the research and cGMP vaccine stocks used in the nonclinical studies.

I told you so:

Thank you, NIH, DTRA, CEPI, and the CIA, for making America great by bringing the bioweapons manufacturing jobs back home!

Thank you, Trump, for picking JD Vance as VP, and for promising to warp speed all drugs once elected. We will have so much of this goodness produced in every hillbilly place that was previously poisoned by warp speeded oxycontin…

Thank you Biden, for announcing the Cancer Moon Shot! After JD Vance and DTRA are done injecting everyone with monkey poison we will sure need it!

I digress…

Methods:

Monkey brains were injected with: 1)the PHV02 Ebola-Nipah chimera, 2) a yellow fever vaccine approved in 1937 ((YF) 17DD) or a “placebo”. Note that the “yellow fever vaccine” is a poison brewed by the US gov without any regulations, approx. 35 years before the FDA started fake-regulating vaccines. It was selected to be a comparator to the Ebola-Nipah chimeric brew for reasons of saying - see, at least ours doesn’t do that! The “placebo” was a Tris buffer solution + human recombinant albumin (a drug, which is a synthetic version of a protein found in human blood). I have no idea why synthetic albumin is added. Post in comments if you know. In any case, true placebo is impossible in this pointless exercise in poisoning monkey brains, as injecting anything directly into the brain will cause brain damage.

First some mice and hamsters got tortured by injecting poisons directly into their brains. The results were “inconclusive”. This, somehow, scientifically “justified” injecting live monkeys directly into the brain for purposes of a “neurovirulence test” (i.e. brain poisoning test that they claim “simulates” what happens with an intramuscular injection). Why is it not sufficient to inject the product intramuscularly and look at the biodistribution/safety/toxicology like normal drug studies do? Well, we don’t want to do THOSE studies, because they always turn out bad for us. Vaccines are different, you see!

Because of the inconsistency of neurovirulence patterns in the rodent models, a monkey neurovirulence test (MNVT) was performed, using YF 17DD as the active comparator because it has a well-established profile of quantifiable microscopic changes in brain centers and a known reporting rate of neurotropic adverse events in humans.

The stated purpose is to poison the animal brains. Since the yellow fever vaccine is known to predictably cause structural brain damage and neurotoxicity in people, the authors decided it was a valid comparator. They also claimed that while their PHV02 concoction is chemically nearly identical to the currently marketed Ebola vax, somehow the Ebola vax was not a valid comparator. Of course it is always best to compare your new vaccine product to the bat soup that was made by witches during the middle ages, duh! We can’t set the bar low enough…

Results:

The published result of this pointless animal cruelty project was the result that the distinguished team of NIH, CEPI, CIA, DTRA and private pharma bros like Vance were going to get no matter what experimental set up! They tortured a bunch of animals, poisoned their brains, then concluded that their new chimeric Ebola-Nipah concoction is probably not neurotoxic to people if injected intramuscularly (unclear based on what data as there was no experimental set up to determine that).

Finally they stated that even though using totally unrelated toxic products to study new categories of other toxic products as controls has not been allowed before (“unprecedented to use heterologous comparator”), the FDA should allow this in the future, because it is “promising”:

The findings are important because they illustrate the complexities of phenotypic assessment of novel viral vectors with tissue tropisms determined by transgenic proteins, and because it is unprecedented to use a heterologous comparator virus (YF vaccine) in a regulatory-enabling study. This approach may have value in future studies of other novel viral vectors.

Of course it is promising! It’s promising to make more money to Vance’s investment fund and other military-industrial backers of this product.

If by now you figured out that this entire study is not science, but an exercise in poison making by a bunch of psychopaths funded by some other psychopaths, you are correct!

History Repeats?

In fact while reading the mice and monkey torture story, I was reminded of the book “Dr. Mary’s Monkey” by Edward Haslam. This book is semi-autobiographical, and it details how the investigation of JFK’s assassination by then District Attorney of New Orleans, Jim Garrison, in the late 1960’s revealed the CIA and private mafia perpetrators. The assassination plot and the people behind it also had ties to the CIA making biological weapons, i.e. substances to induce cancer in humans.

I highly recommend this book, even though I believe several opinions of the author to be erroneous. It also appeared to me that the book had influence of censorship or self-censorship due to some inconsistent and/or implausible conclusions proposed by the author at times. The factual history appears to be accurate and credibly sourced. Ignoring some of the author’s beliefs, it is possible to get a reasonably accurate picture of what transpired back then, and see with greater clarity how the same thing continues today. If you are planning to read the book, stop reading this article and skip to the artwork as there will be some spoilers.

The CIA biowarfare cancer-making operations had a stated goal of assassination of Fidel Castro, and shuttled in New Orleans between “dirty” underground/home based animal labs, and the highest echelons of academia and medicine, i.e. American Cancer Society leadership (Dr. Alton Ochsner and Dr. Mary Sherman). The latter doctors worked under secret contracts from the military using advanced radiation equipment installed at the US military hospital/research facility.

Shannon Joy, a podcaster journalist from Rochester NY, collaborated on a documentary covering a part of this story. She traveled to New Orleans and interviewed Judy Baker for this film. In the 1960’s Judy was Lee Harvey Oswald’s girlfriend. She and Oswald had cover jobs at a coffee company, but were also employed at a “dirty” CIA-funded animal lab, under direction of David Ferrie, a gifted pilot, defrocked priest and an amateur “scientist”, but, by many accounts, also a pedophile degenerate. In the documentary, Judy discussed some of the procedures that she was directed to perform to make the cancer-inducing extracts from mice.

Link to video on Rumble

Link to video on Bitchute

The disgusting process included inducing cancer in a set of mice, typically by injections of various toxins into their brains, then harvesting tumors, selecting the worst ones, making extracts from them, and injecting that into another set of animals. The blenderized tumors were stored in David Ferrie’s home refrigerator together with his beer. That’s how dangerous viruses are stored, folks! Ferrie’s fridge wasn’t (and isn’t) the only one! OMG, what if they leak? (Quick, someone, please contact James O’Keefe so we can discuss the world ending potential of mutating viruses in labs!)

I digress. Subsequently, these cancer smoothies would be sent to the “clean” research lab, where Dr. Sherman under direction of Dr. Ochsner would use a linear particle accelerator (a secret 3-story installation in a military hospital with 5 million volts of power) to expose them to radiation in hopes of “mutating” the “cancer viruses”. My personal opinion, these psychos were hoping to animate the blenderized tumors and make them “alive replicating”, kind of like the Frankenstein story. That didn’t work. The experiments also include monkeys with skulls sawed open, fitted to the apparatus to infuse these poisons into their brains. It was believed that monkey carried lots of viruses deadly to humans, and were particularly useful to induce cancer in people, due to similarities with humans. My personal opinion - monkeys do not carry any particular large variety of viruses. The reason for the belief in “monkey viruses” is because monkeys are very smart animals. Much smarter than rats, mice and hamsters. They know what people are doing, and they can anticipate that they will have their skulls sawed open. So, they fight - bite, scratch, throw feces and scream bloody murder at their handlers. Monkeys also look like little people, in some ways like children. The prospect of sawing off a scull of a little human-like creature to pour poison into it, while the creature KNOWS what you are about to do terrorizes the abusers of monkeys and they get prone to mistakes - needle sticks, getting bit and getting the bite infected with monkey feces, and so on. That’s how the myth of “monkey viruses” came to be in the “science” field.

Judy Baker revealed that at some point Dr. Ochsner used the toxic cancer extract on a mentally ill person, and the man died in 28 days. There were other human victims, but Judy knew only of that one person. At that point Judy rebelled and lost her position in the lab as well as prospects for career in cancer research and had to leave/go into hiding.

This process of injecting and harvesting is what is referred to as “passaging viruses” through animals with claims of “gain-of-function”. There was no reliable way to make anything “transmit” between animals back then, and there is no such method now. The most reliable method of inducing cancer is still by injection. That’s why the Blob is hellbent on vaccinating everyone continuously.

The book covers Dr. Alton Ochsner extensively. He was a leading figure in the science and medical field of cancer in the US and internationally, a famous cancer surgeon. He was widely celebrated in academia and medicine and had an extremely successful and lucrative business operating on cancer patients, including on heads of state and other powerful people, especially from Latin America. There were rumors that he was a Nazi sympathizer, involved in “Paperclipping” Nazi scientists. In any case, he seemed to know a lot of rich people in Latin America after WWII. When he perceived a threat to his cancer business interests from the rise of communism in the region (which would potentially eliminate the rich and powerful people’s ability to fly to his clinic for cancer treatments), he financed a propaganda operation called INCA, the Information Council of the Americas. A typical INCA production interviewed Cuban exiles. From these interviews, INCA produced and distributed “Truth Tapes” to 120 radio stations throughout Latin America.

Dr. Ochsner had powerful government connections in the US, too. In the early 1960, ex-Vice President Richard Nixon called on Ochsner in New Orleans, supposedly to discuss his political plans. Nixon and Ochsner shared not only politics, but medical experiences, too. The Salk polio vaccine was “contaminated” with cancer causing SV-40 and pushed on driven-mad-with-fear public by the NIH during Nixon’s Vice Presidency (1953-61). Within days numerous children were paralyzed, fell ill with polio and many died. Lawsuits erupted. Dr. Ochsner famously killed his own grandson and crippled his granddaughter with this vaccine. Does this remind you of Peter Hotez who poisoned his own daughter with vaccines? There are numerous examples of medical psychopaths killing and injuring their own children and grandchildren, sacrificing them to their death cult.

The bad publicity generated by the polio vax at the time caused a political crisis, removing the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and some of the leadership of the NIH. Entering the office of President in 1969, Nixon promptly declared “War on Cancer”, quadrupled the budget of the National Cancer Institute, converted the Army’s biological warfare center to a cancer research laboratory, and financed the NIH’s “Viral Cancer Program”. Did you notice what he did? Renamed a biological weapons facility into “viral cancer program”! Ta-da!

Meanwhile, the person who brought attention to the polio vax causing polio and cancer, an NIH employee Dr. Bernice Eddy, had her lab shut down, was put under a gag order and otherwise professionally smeared and destroyed.

During the 20 years of the “War on Cancer”, $22B+ of taxpayers’ money was spent on research. For reference, the Salk polio vaccine was pushed on the deceived public because of 33K cases of polio/year at its peak. Neither the original poison (Salk), nor the newer versions of the polio vax prevent polio. This is stated on the product label. The polio shots “contaminated” with SV-40 and who knows what else by the 1980’s resulted in an epidemic of cancer that dwarfed anything that can be called an epidemic of polio. For a long time asbestos was used for filtration of vaccines. Today, I believe graphene oxide might be used for the same purpose, as “legal” asbestos. All cancers went up by 20%, but specifically soft tissue cancers, skyrocketed: breast (+200K cases/year), prostate (+200K cases/year), skin and lung cancers (+500K cases/year).

With mRNA injections we have seen an enormous rise in cancers, among numerous other deadly conditions, some immediate, some more long term.

Truly, when the government investigates itself and finds itself guilty, it rewards itself with greater budgets to commit same crimes under different labels.

Other interesting connections that are mentioned in Edward Halsam’s book - there were numerous Gottliebs associated with with a variety of CIA/DOD medical and biowarfare projects. Dr. Sidney Gottlieb was the medical director of the program of advancing the death of Fidel Castro by use of various poisons. Dr. Michael S. Gottlieb “discovered AIDS” at UCLA in 1981. Dr. A. Arthur Gottlieb was the editor of the US Army Biological Warfare (Ft Detrick) book in 1972. While familial relationship, if any, is unclear, Scott Gottlieb, former commissioner of the FDA under Trump, a Pfizer board member is also a board member of the National Resilience, the manufacturer of the Ebola-Nipah virus concoction for Dr. Vance’s Monkeys torture experiments.

Art for today: Morning in Carson Valley, watercolor, 9x12 in.

This is not a drill, this is serious, says John Campbell (quote from deleted YouTube video):

100% lethal. Time to ban this research. Lethal Infection of Human ACE2-Transgenic Mice Caused by SARS-CoV-2- related Pangolin Coronavirus GX_P2V(short_3UTR) 4th January 2024 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11... https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11... SARS-CoV-2-related pangolin coronavirus GX_P2V can cause 100% mortality in human ACE2-transgenic mice, potentially attributable to late-stage brain infection. This underscores a spillover risk of GX_P2V into humans, and provides a unique model for understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2-related viruses.

“Time to ban this research” is the key to this self-inflicted propaganda piece.

Notice the wording of the title of this “science” paper: “Lethal Infection of Human ACE2-Transgenic Mice Caused by SARS-CoV-2-related Pangolin Coronavirus GX_P2V(short_3UTR)”.

Let’s do a quick neuro-linguistic programming analysis:

Word #1: LETHAL

Word #2: INFECTION

Word #3: of HUMAN

Oh, my goodness! Do you know why these 3 words were carefully placed in those positions?

What are the chances, in your opinion, that a regular Joe reads past these 3 words of the title? What are the chances a journalist reads more than these 3 words? Or a doctor, or a scientist? What are the chances YOU read past the headline, be honest? Pretty close to zero is my answer. There may be a handful of people that will do the heavy lifting, read the entire thing, think independently from the CIA/Hollywood predictive programming and the church-of-NIH dogma, and provide non fear-pornography based analysis. John Campbell is not one of them.

Here are the most attractive types of clickbait headlines:

Looks like “key phrases” and “negative” (or scary) works really well. Negative headlines bring more readers—up to 30% more than neutral headlines and 59% more than positive ones. This explains very well why, when I write what should be considered good news - “no, you are not infected with synthetic cross domain nanocooties activated by 5G” - people get mad at me. And unsubscribe. Sometimes they are threatening lawsuits while they do this (true story). I could have a million subscribers by now if, like John Campbell, I really knew what’s good for me… I digress…

But, but, but - it’s a peer reviewed scientific journal! They would never write click bait! Well, they just did. And not “just”, they have been doing this for a long time, as long as this particular genre has been funded by the military-industrial Pandemic Preparedness Racket. And, just like the celebrity gossip magazines in the checkout aisles, they recycle the same fake stories over and over again, with different characters, locations, accessories and pets.

And you buy them every time.

Because THIS TIME, it has a pangolin and a brain infection in it.

There must be some seasonality to these informational campaigns, too, because LAST TIME the same brouhaha was all over media almost exactly a year ago. Do you remember the bombshell story from Project Veritas about Pfizer mutating viruses? And here is the Boston University 80% mouse killer story from The Fear Porn Magazine Winter 2023 Edition, debunked:

Boston University made an 80% mouse killer SarsCov mutant very recently. Besides provoking a number of great memes, it managed to not produce an apocalyptic lab leak and so did not wipe out Boston University itself (oh well, maybe next time). Why, you may ask? It was a 80% lethal strain! Of a novel mutated virus from the lab! It was even published in a peer reviewed journal, so it must be true! There were great takedowns of that BS from BU which I won’t republish now, but here is a short synopsis - PhDs played with soups of “viruses” that they thought might be more deadly because awesome computer models told them so. Nothing transmissible from animal to animal was made and 8/10 mice were euthanized because in the opinion of the investigators they were going to die anyway. Actually, the truth is simpler than this - the PhDs need to eat, they didn’t want to hunt for food or grow it, and so they submitted a grant application to the church of NIH using the prayerful keywords that the NIH likes (killer, zoonotic, viruses, pandemic preparedness), and the NIH gave them money for a couple of months. The PhDs bought food and paid rent. Some mice were sacrificed at the altar of the church of NIH. The end.

Even Pfizer, who skillfully mutates viruses in the lab using black magik arts, could not make covid happen in monkeys, despite monkeys having identical to humans ACE-2 receptors for which this deadly pathogen was allegedly engineered. As I reported, a year ago:

Here is Pfizer’s experience with rhesus monkeys in their own preclinical development summary from Comirnaty BLA submission to the FDA. They cited prior literature that said monkeys are a valid model for covid illness in humans. They sprayed the animals with “virus” (whatever that is) directly into the nose and throat, after vaccinating half of them. No covid illness resulted from this, neither in the “vaccinated” nor in the “unvaccinated” animals. Despite what Dr. Walker said to impress his Project Veritas date, Pfizer didn’t even try animal to animal transmission (they know it doesn’t work).

Pfizer refers to prior literature that indicates that “human and rhesus ACE-2 receptor have 100% amino acid identity at the critical binding residues, which may account for fidelity of this SARS-CoV-2 animal model”.

Yet, when Pfizer attempts to produce covid illness in these “100% identical to human ACE-2 receptor carriers” by spraying virus into the animals throats directly - oh no! It doesn’t work. To be sure, non-diagnostic, non-validated PCR is “detecting viral RNA”, but there is no covid illness to be found:

But we were told that the virus was optimized for ACE-2 receptors, the monkeys have the same receptors, the “viral” RNA was detected in the animals - what happened? I don’t know, but this always happens when there are too many modeling assumptions and not enough validation, which is the state of “science” today.

The 100% mouse killer virus paper this winter is not much different from the BU BS story last winter, or from Pfizer’s own failed monkey voodoo. Minor differences include the location (Chyna-a-a-aaagh!), and some creative flourishes like pangolins and brains. Substantively, nothing is different. This exercise, just like the Boston one did not make anything transmissible, not even between the mice (forget humans). The mice had to be drowned in the toxic soup poured down nasal passages, and sure thing that resulted in rotting their poor little brains. What this paper describes in reality: making of chemical weapons (toxins and poisons), and renaming them into “viral clones” and other biotechnology mumbo-jumbo. So the cries for “BAN THIS DANGEROUS RESEARCH!!!” should be reasonably answered by:

IT IS ALREADY INTERNATIONALLY BAAAAANNNNEDDDD! Since 1970s.

We can ban it some more, by including the words “engineered virus, GOF, etc”

THAT WAS BANNED BY OBAMA! REMEMBER?

Oh.

Do you see the pattern? Should we ban all English words? I assure you, they’ll make up new words, or start communicating in African whistles and clicks but won’t stop making poisons. What has banning of dangerous research accomplished so far?

Think…

Think…

Think some more….

You got it - MORE MONEY for dangerous research! That’s the whole point of this seasonal fear porn genre. It’s the rain dance for more manna from heavens. The Chinese colleagues who published this 100% mouse killer story are helping the American colleagues who need to claim that Chynaaaaaagh!! is about to attack us with a deadly pangolin-mouse-brain rot, which will leak from their very leaky labs. And thus dear American colleagues absolutely must have another trillion bucks to “be prepared” - build the mRNA vaccine factories and quarantine camps, make up another few bullshit federal agencies with fancy names and awesome superpowers, including but not limited to unaccountability, secrecy and sovereign immunity, plus the overhead for all the required diversity, inclusion, sustainability, carbon credits, signature reduction, and morale and recreation programs (the latter is coke and prostitutes, duh).

Dream big, kids! So much can be accomplished by a carefully placed little letter to the editor, 4 dead mice, and some clueless but over-eager content creators online…

Art for today: War and Peace, oil on linen, 16x20 in.

You will hear from “resistance leaders” that engineered bioweapon viruses can be made by students with equipment and materials from Amazon, then leaked and kill half the planet. Please do not buy recycled Hollywood garbage about germ warfare. You know better.

This is a story about several daring escapes which go back to 2013. The escapees were carrying a super deadly "engineered" recombinant SARS COV virus. Gasp!

At least one of the escapees was intercepted with a broom, but others made it to freedom from Ralph Baric's secret biosecurity-level-infinity lab. Godspeed, brave little souls!

I have not heard of a global mouse pandemic, have you? Not even a local epidemic. Maybe the Mouse WHO (MWHO) needs to be alerted? Did mice practice Event 201 at Johns Mouse Hopkins and did they outline Mouse Agenda 2030? I have a lot of questions.

Here is the full report on this terrifying crisis that for some reason failed to generate a Jurassic Mouse Park in North Carolina or elsewhere.

Here is why I don't believe Boston University or any other academic clickbait about chimeric killer viruses they claim to make.  And neither should you.

To be sure, I think all of these boondoggles should be shut down, but not because they can actually produce an engineered deadly virus, but because they are wasting our money while simultaneously creating the fear propaganda about things they are not able to make. 

If you hear “every PhD student can make a deadly pathogen in a home lab” - please do not fall for this 3-letter agencies-inspired nonsense. While the techniques maybe available, these “engineered viruses” are duds that cannot and do not spread as they get rapidly attenuated by interaction with all living nature. To make something remotely dangerous one needs to make and purify A LOT of biological material, which is very expensive and requires substantial manufacturing facilities. PhD students do not have these kind of resources. You know who does? The Government-Military-Academia-Pharmaceutical complex that appropriates and spends billions to “keep you safe” from “rogue PhD students”. However, the government-academia-pharma cartel cannot make anything that lives and spreads by itself. They have to apply their biowarfare materials in some other ways, such as aerosols, gels and other formulations and even then it is only dangerous to small numbers of people and for a short period of time. Here’s Peter Daszak’s DEFUSE proposal to DARPA explaining how he was going to make these “novel automated aerosolization systems”, “transdermal nanoparticles applications”, and “edible adhesive gels” and test them on bat colonies in caves (which are probably a good model for a crowded city during the commuter hour).

Pandemics do not exist in nature. Epidemics, if they do occur are local and self-extinguishing, because that’s how nature works. The evil psychopaths cannot really make pandemics happen. They can only scare you into believing these are possible in order to gain control over you and establish their cherished dream - a global totalitarian biosecurity state. Be Not Afraid. Merry Christmas to all!

More posts on how to fake pandemics coming in January.

Art piece for today: Joan of Arc, oil on linen, 30x40 inches.

I don’t know where that pic was taken, and for all I know, those are coffee stains on paper. This describes our clown-infested reality pretty accurately.

The use of disease as a weapon is thought to date back to at least the Middle Ages, for example, when the Tatars (partially my ancestors, yay) used catapults to hurl plague victims over protective walls of the city of Caffa. Use of blankets from smallpox victims in order to expose Native Americans to smallpox is also well publicized. I don’t know of many historical accounts where this produced a decisive advantage in a war. It was always a psy-op and fear tactic, while brutal military force was required to actually win wars.

Nevertheless, weaponization of “pathogens” has been a coveted area of military machinery for a very long time. After decades of beating heads against the wall of nature and definitively confirming what I learned in the 1980’s in a Soviet high school class taught by a drunk colonel, namely - it is impossible to make bio-weapons both lethal and highly spreadable - new approaches were needed. Fabricating scary narratives about superbugs is much easier than delivering on promises of making those bugs in labs. This is also a very productive avenue as people are woefully gullible and thus can be controlled by narratives just as effectively as by an actual scary-scary bioengineered virus.

I will be quoting from this 2014 Air Force bioweapons report

which is written for imbeciles they think we are. To be honest, this is not an entirely unfounded point of view, as most “science experts” today cannot distinguish reality from sci-fi narratives they are obligated to produce in order to get grants from the NIH, DARPA, BARDA, DTRA, NSF, etc. The report discusses the origin of “biodefense” which has since grown into the military-industrial-pharma-”healthcare” trillion dollar behemoth of “Pandemic Preparedness” racket:

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Richard Preston‘s 1997 novel The Cobra Event was a fictional scenario of bioterrorism with a genetically engineered supervirus. President Clinton‘s reading of this novel sensitized him to the bioterrorist threat. He looked more deeply into the BW/BT threat and subsequently issued two Presidential Decision Directives to address national security deficiencies related to biological and chemical terrorism and warfare. In the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and the multiple anthrax tainted letters subsequently sent to national legislators, the Governor of New York, and news media offices, President Bush established the Homeland Security Council to coordinate a national effort of some 40 diverse agencies and organizations that were already involved in homeland security. Because we do not know what new diseases will arise, we must always be prepared for the unexpected. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta is the nation‘s lead agency for disease epidemics and tracks naturally occurring emerging infectious diseases worldwide. The CDC has traveled all over the world and investigated outbreaks of Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Marburg virus, hantavirus, and other emerging diseases. These were challenging natural outbreaks of pathogens that had not been previously known to man. An outbreak of a biologically engineered pathogen might create a similar situation and may have an even greater disease potential (contagion and mortality) than recently discovered naturally emerging diseases. The epidemiological investigations of these emerging infectious diseases and other outbreaks serve as templates for responses to future biowarfare and bioterrorist events.

So much to unpack here!

First, Bill Clinton gets inspired by a trashy novel which spins standard-issue baloney about “bioengineered” viruses cooked by a rogue mad scientist in his apartment. The mad scientists is tracked and found by a heroic super smart CDC agent (yes, I am laughing as I type this while visualizing Mandy Cohen). The motivation of that absolutely lonesome not-attached-to-the-DOD/biodefense-racket scientist is that he is extremely mad and wants to reduce the world’s population in order to save the planet! Oh no! Who would have thought of such craziness? Not the do-gooding billionaires of course, they never discuss this at their conferences or write government policies about “population control”. I borrowed (and slightly doctored) this image from Dr. Nass’s excellent article about the tendency to try to “save the world” among the billionaires:

The script of the trashy novel about “bioengineered viruses” has been since recycled through many Hollywood and Netflix productions as predictive programming narrative for the masses. It always contains a rogue batshit crazy scientist and he is always defeated by a heroic CDC/FBI agent. The masses buy this trope because unlike the Soviet schools, the American ones do not employ enlightened drunk colonels to teach the basics of bioweapon technologies. Notice that most of the current “freedom” narratives studiously avoid the truth and circle around “evil Fauci did it” or “pharma bad”, or “FDA/CDC stupid, negligent and paid by bad pharma”. Sometimes they try to claim that CCP employed and directed Fauci (that’s hysterical). If repeated enough with angry intonations by Rand Paul, eventually everyone will believe that Fauci did it all by himself, or with/for China, or whichever clump of spaghetti that sticks to the wall. And that it was not orchestrated by the Pentagon in collusion with numerous government agencies and private entities working on behalf of the private interests of the globalist psychopaths that own the BIS and other central banks. I am not at all defending bad pharma or Fauci, or China, but let’s be real.

Back to the bioweapons history: September 11 inside job and anthrax hoax to shake down US Congress. George Bush, working for the same set of masters as Clinton, implements the next phase of the “homeland security” and biodefense racket. To date this racket has grown into the global enslavement and murder agenda being hastily finalized at WHO/WEF - “One Health”. By now it should be clear that we are talking about unrestricted warfare using prohibited chemical and biological weapons (toxins) camouflaged as “pandemics” in humans and animals, as well as other acts of state terrorism against the people. The racketeers initiate the attacks, and then offer “protection” in the form of poisonous injections and digital slavery, and use grandiose slogans like “resilience to biological threats”:

Continuing to quote from the Air Force report on bioweapons:

Yet, as bad as anthrax-by-mail was, an outbreak of a biologically engineered pathogen could be potentially even more devastating. Although highly lethal, the anthrax of September 2001 was determined to be a well known strain…

Steven Hatfill can probably explain where it came from! And why this “outbreak-by-mail” happened to hit the offices of the only 2 US Senators who were blocking the Patriot Act?

…and it was not contagious (spread from person to person). Although anthrax spores are highly stable and can remain viable for years, compared to other pathogens a relatively large number of organisms is required to cause illness. These facts may explain why investigators found traces of anthrax spores in many office buildings and post offices, but only a few people actually contracted the disease. Furthermore, if evidence of an anthrax attack is determined (as was the case just after September 11), people can be screened for exposure and/or treated with antibiotics that are highly effective if taken before symptoms begin. There is also an FDA-approved vaccine for anthrax.

Translation: in theory biologically engineered pathogens can be devastating, but in practice we didn’t need those things. We blackmailed the US Congress with stuff that’s not contagious, generally not very dangerous and treatable. Then we wrote many scary news articles and appropriated trillions for “biodefense”. Mwah-ha-ha!

We also used this hoax to inject military servicemembers with 6 doses of total shit beautiful “anthrax vaccine” and caused hundreds of thousands of injuries, aka “Gulf Syndrome”. An excellent expert report by on the complete improbability of the Gulf Syndrome being anything but the anthrax vaccine injury can be found here. That was a test of the concept of mass poisoning under pretense of “biodefense preparedness”. The Gulf experience allowed the DOD to test out the pesky informed consent thing, and then push the zombies in Congress to pass some necessary legislation for the future, i.e. the ironclad license to kill - the PREP Act.

Modern Weaponization Approaches Based on Linguistics

The advent of microbiological techniques enabled several nations, but most extensively the Soviet Union and the United States, to develop offensive biological weapons programs, which continued until they were legally prohibited by the Biological Weapons Convention, signed in 1972. After the BWC was signed, the development of pathogens as weapons became the province of clandestine nation-state programs and non-state actor terrorism (aka “private contractors”).

More prosaically however, renaming an offensive bioweapons development into “defensive medical countermeasures” program enabled continuation of the bioweapon development without interruption, and further provided trillions of funding for DARPA, BARDA, other defense and intelligence outfits for capturing key areas of scientific research and biopharmaceutical manufacturing via consortia of “non-traditional” defense contractors, such as for example - MCDC Consortium which was heavily involved in “covid countermeasures” and currently lists 300+ companies and academic institutions as members.

…although security protocols such as the Federal Select Agent Program primarily in North America and Western Europe, have attempted to limit access to dangerous pathogens for many years, synthetic biology makes it possible to synthesize genomes and use those to generate, or “boot,” copies of naturally occurring organisms in the laboratory, opening new opportunities for the acquisition of existing, regulated pathogens. Second, synthetic biology techniques could […] potentially result in pathogens that have, in comparison to the original pathogen, increased virulence; antibiotic resistance; ability to produce toxins, chemicals, or biochemicals; or ability to evade known prophylactic or therapeutic modalities.

They call it “synthetic biology”, but it has little to do with the biology of living things. Despite what is claimed in the quote above, nobody can make a synthetic living or compatible-with-life organism (such as a real virus to the extend that they exist as a communications protocol between real living cells). Current scientific understanding of what makes things “live” is approximately nil, and hyped-up gene sequencing and decoding of human DNA resulted in no significant improvement of this situation. I am old enough to remember that cancer was going to be cured right after human genome was fully sequenced, but somehow all those hyped up dreams went quickly bust. What can be synthesized in the lab are chemical macro-molecules containing nucleic acid chains. They are different from those produced and operated by living beings due to limitations of chemical engineering, which are too complex to cover here. Sometimes the methods of synthesis are chemical reaction (to make RNA), sometimes it’s a combination of chemical and biological reaction, such as growing DNA material in e.coli cells replicating DNA plasmids. Macro-molecules are often unstable and require additional substrates for preservation and delivery, such as LNP envelope and hydrogels. Synthetic compounds inspired by natural toxins (and venoms), including stable small peptides can also be made, and these are used pretty widely in drugs and cosmetics.

In other words, the weaponized “disease agents” are mostly chemicals. Some of them are bio-chemicals.

This explains how anthrax used in the US Congress shakedown was easily identified as a “known strain” by those who made it. It was not some random spore from Siberian permafrost - it was a synthesized chemical product traceable to the source.

These bio-agents are a new generation of chemical weapons of mass destruction. The innovation is the combination of chemical and informational weapons (i.e. weaponized government/corporate lies). They are mass destructive alright: double digit sustained excess mortality globally for 3 years is higher kill than any nuclear bomb! Most of it is self-inflicted, too! These new upgraded versions of WMDs cannot be as easily categorized into old chemical WMD classifications and have an advantage of plausible deniability. When deployed, they do not look obvious like a mustard gas attack. They are mild, diffuse, overlap with seasonal flu like illness, and, with a lot of propaganda can be playacted as a “pandemic” convincingly enough for the public dumbed by fear and predictively programmed by Hollywood. Most importantly this can be playacted for the professional class, who are so obedient that they nod in agreement to idiotic statements such as “asymptomatic spread of deadly disease” and proceed to murder the hospital patients with remdesivir and ventilators. Even when concrete evidence of man-made malfeasance exist, we can still run Congressional hearings for years discussing whether it was a bat, or a “lab leak” and scream that Fauci is responsible. Social media can be awash with “experts” and “influencers” on both sides debating the same dead-end topics till cows come home.

In July 2023 US finally destroyed all declared chemical WMDs, even though this had been promised by 1997. Again, they write this for idiots - what about the “undeclared” ones, used for faking pandemic “emergencies”? Right!

The stupefied predictively programmed public reacts with fear to a very treatable and often non-existing illness accompanied by the keywords of “novel virus”, “bioengineered pathogen”, “superbug”, “pandemic”, “outbreak”, “lockdown”, ”asymptomatic”, “gain-of-function” etc. and runs off the cliff to self-destruct. Additional narratives designed to drown the truth in the sea of irrelevance are also simultaneously launched, e.g., the cult of “no virus” (ideology stems from the older cult of Christian Science), or the cult of “transhumanism”. Check out Yuri’s post about cults including the history of transhumanism. All such cults are ideologically similar as they rely on extreme narrow-mindedness and inability or prohibition of independent thought.

I was asked by a reader referring to this interview:

Sasha, at minute 43:36 in this interview you said to Mr. Kirsch "...There's no way to develop viruses that are both lethal and spreadable; That's a myth; That's a science-fiction myth; Ok, so that doesn't exist - off the table".

I haven't heard or read anyone else say that. What I hear and read from many sources, is the story about lovely gentleman and ladies that enjoy working in BSL3 & BSL4 labs, and they cobble together bits and pieces of biological things and attach them to other biological things and make scary-scary viruses they call chimeric bioweapons. Some journalists, and some lawyers, cite papers that explain what the gentleman & ladies of the labs have fabricated using gain-of-function, dual-use research, synthetic biology magic. And then tell us that these lab-made very scary things are bioweapons that may kill everybody.

If what you say is true {I'll take your word for it} then all the work to make scary-scary viruses and frighten billions of people into getting injected is a huge scam, setup to make the participants wealthy.

Are there other people, with skill sets similar to yours, that have said the same thing?

Not just frighten billions of people, but importantly blackmail legislators (or create cover for the cooperating legislators) to approve the illegal laws and billions for the biodefense scam. All they had to do is poison or pretend to poison a handful of politicians. Of course, you can poison one person with anything. Or 10 people in one location. But these bioweapon deployments are not anything alive and they don’t spread by themselves. Fear and lies are self-spreading, however, and can be skillfully used to drive people to self-destruction and to killing of others.

Other people are not talking about it, because biodefense is a huge grift on both sides. “Their” side appropriates money and power, and new billion dollar agencies for “Pandemic Preparedness”. “Our” side gets millions of followers talking about them evil guys, or spinning stories about biolabs in Wuhan, Ukraine and lately California. Remember, any rogue crazy PhD can build a scary biolab, and no PhD degree is actually needed. All you have to do is rent some space, leave a bunch of mice and random equipment that can’t be used for anything, and voila - scary biolab narrative is all over the news. Those evil CCP masterminds are working on weaponized mice! Did we forget that Ralph Baric has done the same for decades in North Carolina and failed to produce any pandemics there? Come to think of this, has your cat ever brought a weaponized mouse home to you as a present? Why not? They “leak” from labs almost every week, and using CRISPER gene drive narrative logic, all mice in the world should look like Ralph Baric by now.

Nobody can make a super-virus in a lab. But

C’s Newsletter

The fucking vaccine creates the fucking virus, study concludes.

Shrestha et al, Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine, didn’t say “The fucking vaccine creates the fucking virus.” The said, “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2).” Look at it. You want to stick that in your arm…

Read more

3 years ago · 38 likes · 7 comments · Charles Wright

And that’s the truth…

Buy me a ko-fi

Art for today: The Chase, oil on linen, 22x28 in.

Of course, the woke tantrum about this subject is a politically motivated slander. To them an ideological opponent is a racist when he mentions anything that has to do with race or ethnicity. Or mentions anything at all. Or exists.

However, if you are wondering whether ethnically targeted bioweapons are a thing, let’s look into this. This topic is definitely studied and discussed in many press, science, government and military reports. RFK Jr. is perfectly correct to state this. He did not suggest the covid-19 poisoning agent was preferentially designed to protect Ashkenazi population. This is also correct. It wasn’t, really.

Here is a review article on this topic published by Scientific American in 2020. It mentioned an international Rockefeller-affiliated initiative looking precisely into the issue. Nobody accused them of racism as far as I know.

There are several published studies on the ethnic differences in the susceptibility to covid illness, here is one of them:

Link to the study here.

In this study, we investigated genetic susceptibility to COVID-19 by examining DNA polymorphisms in ACE2 and TMPRSS2 (two key host factors of SARS-CoV-2) from ~ 81,000 human genomes. We found unique genetic susceptibility across different populations in ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Specifically, ACE2 polymorphisms were found to be associated with cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions by altering the angiotensinogen-ACE2 interactions, such as p.Arg514Gly in the African/African-American population. Unique but prevalent polymorphisms (including p.Val160Met (rs12329760), an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL)) in TMPRSS2, offer potential explanations for differential genetic susceptibility to COVID-19 as well as for risk factors, including those with cancer and the high-risk group of male patients. We further discussed that polymorphisms in ACE2 or TMPRSS2 could guide effective treatments (i.e., hydroxychloroquine and camostat) for COVID-19.

The study showed a VERY WEAK ethnic differences in susceptibility to covid illness and its severity (whatever the true cause of it). Any ethnic based “risk” identified was much weaker than the risk associated with, for example, male gender. Thus having more ACE2 receptors overall was a larger risk than a particular configuration of them that a university lab can measure and call a “genetic subtype”. The study was conducted by several labs at the Cleveland Clinic and funded by the NIH.

Here is a story by The Guardian, which interestingly points to RNA interference to achieve the objective of ethnic/genetic targeting:

Rather than specifically triggering the toxic effects of organisms such as anthrax, the Sunshine project warned that weapons based on a new medical technique called RNA interference could shut down vital genes… "If as little as 10% or 20% of a target population would be affected, this would wreak havoc among enemy soldiers on a battlefield or in an enemy society as a whole," the group said.

The % of ethnic targeting proposed as a minimal success here is orders of magnitude higher than what was demonstrated for covid ethnic affinities (1% or far less).

The same article contained a rational counter-argument:

Others say the concerns are exaggerated. "Trying to find a weapon that affects quite a few of one ethnic group and none of another ethnic group is just not going to happen," says David Goldstein, who studies population genetics at University College London. "Because all groups are quite similar you will never get something that is highly selective. The best you would probably do is something that kills 20% of one group and 28% of another."

Mr. Goldstein has a point. Targeting by ethnic or population genetics is tricky as there are few ethnic-specific genes, people of the target ethnicity may or may not have them, and many off-target effects with technologies used for targeting.

Speaking of “rational” - RationalWiki is a hilarious read on this topic:

A number of organisations have warned against the danger that such a weapon could be created, including the British Medical Association, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and a subcommittee of the US Congress, and the idea has been reported by various publications. More dubiously, it has been claimed that some existing viruses such as HIV were developed to target specific ethnic groups. Conspiracy theories about racial bioweapons feed on a combination of deep-seated fears: suspicion of genetic technology; the worry that the government is trying to capture deeply personal information (such as genetic codes); and government or institutional racism.

They add “white dog” and “racist AI” to the list of ethnically targeted weapons.

Reading this almost makes me believe that ethnic genetic targeting is actually quite feasible, since they are adamant it is a racist conspiracy. This leads me to think that maybe I should reconsider my prior conclusion. At a minimum, I strongly believe that ethnic genetic targeting has been attempted numerous times by all participants in the Trillion dollar global bio-chemical weapons industry. Of course, the existence of this industry is a crazy conspiracy theory to begin with, because these are an internationally prohibited class of weapons. Thus, no government in the world would do such as thing as to lie, hide those programs in academia, “public health”, “ecological research”, outsource them to foreign contractors (like Wuhan) and lavishly fund them for decades.

Overall conclusion so far is that ethnic genetic differences are too diffuse to make a good target, however, there are other, potentially better resolved targets. Targeting microbiome differences rather than differences in the DNA of the host has been identified as one of them.

It also may be possible to engineer a bioweapon to target populations with a specific microbiome profile; any adversary that begins to better parse, store, and analyze the data that are increasingly being collected about human microbiomes will also be in a better position for probabilistic targeting of microbiome threats (see also Chapter 7, Targeting)

Different ethnic communities are known to have distinct microflora - the microbial inhabitants of the human digestive tract, nose, mouth, throat, sinuses and skin. Those organisms are non-human cells, there are in fact more of them than human cells in a body, and they have their own genetics. They live in balance with the human cells and are in fact vital to our metabolism, energy, mental and neurologic function and overall immune system function. When I worked in pharma R&D, one of the requirements of the Japanese regulators for western drug approvals in Japan was to do clinical studies in Japanese subjects. 100% ethnically Japanese immigrants to the US were not qualified to enroll after they resided in the US for 18+ months. The regulators never explained this seemingly capricious requirement, but now I know what they were after. The true Japanese microbiome, which would change over with a relocation of the person to a different continent. Change of the microflora quite literally changes the person’s body.

Other studies looked for differences in susceptibility in different blood type groups and found that some blood types fared better than others. Obviously, blood types have genetic and ethnic components. Many other ethnic-genetic targets have been proposed, such as various enzymes and enzymatic pathways.

Here is another frequently cited study on the topic of ethnic susceptibility to covid “virus” due to electrostatic attraction of ACE2 polymorphisms. This study used different genomic databases and looked for different markers compared to the first study references in this post, which underscores that all these studies are highly dependent on the underlying datasets. However, they also found slight protective advantage to Ashkenazi Jewish population:

The susceptibility of different populations to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet understood. Here, we combined ACE2 coding variants' analysis in different populations and computational chemistry calculations to probe the effects on SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 interaction. ACE2-K26R; which is most frequent in Ashkenazi Jewish population decreased the SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 electrostatic attraction. On the contrary, ACE2-I468V, R219C, K341R, D206G, G211R increased the electrostatic attraction; ordered by binding strength from weakest to strongest. The aforementioned variants are most frequent in East Asian, South Asian, African and African American, European, European and South Asian populations, respectively.

The protective differences found were very weak:

The K26R variant which decreases the ACE2-virus binding was found to be most frequent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population (1.2%).

All other ethnic effects found were smaller than 1%, and having male gender carried a much larger risk than any specific ethnicity. Given these tiny rates of the specific ACE2 polymorphism incidence, I started thinking - why are they attributed to the entire ethnicities and races in these studies? An average Ashkenazi Jewish male would be at a far greater risk than an average African American female, despite what this paper says, because the incidence of the protective or disadvantageous polymorphisms is so small. However, for those individuals who are the carriers of K26R the protective difference is indeed quite large. This is because K26R is not at all equally likely to be found in every Ashkenazi Jewish person. So why include all Ashkenazi into the conclusions? Or all African Americans or all Europeans?

This is the product of how the genomics databases are set up. The ethnicity (plus gender and age) of the subjects who contributed the genomic data is a field in the database, while any other information about them, their phenotype, or their family relationships are not. It is off-limits certainly due to data privacy regulations. The self-declared ethnicity is the only phenotype grouping more granular than gender that is possible when using these datasets in published academic research.

The K26R polymorphism is so sparsely found because it is a familial inherited marker first, it only happens to be associated with Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity. Same is true for other polymorphisms and markers studied. They are inherited genetic traits, and people who have them have common genetic lineage. Because of the general trend for marriages within one’s ethnicity, they tend to be found in some ethnicities more often than others.

Could designer choices be part of making a poisoning agent based on known (to them) familial genetic markers? Yes. A designer’s personal bias, or biases of those who pay him are not terribly unusual in making new products or technologies.

While not terribly dangerous overall, the illness was experienced by many, and even excluding the effect of the hospital murder protocols, some people still fared worse then others. Some had to seek hospital care while others had barely a sniffle. Many studies showed associations with certain genetic markers which are familial traits. Where these markers random happenstance, or designer choices? Somebody should ask these questions.

Art for today: At Sunrise, oil on panel, 9x12 in.

U.S. Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak, according to a new classified intelligence report.

Wall Street Journal Article here.

Twitter is ablaze with “we knew!” “told you so” etc., people who fell for a slightly more sophisticated lie (bioengineered virus “leak” from Wuhan) celebrating that they didn’t fall for the really obvious bullshit (bat-pangolin story).

Lab Leak is baloney. I hope you can see it now as it is being unveiled in the most unsubtle way right on cue before WHO pandemic treaty is being put in place.

They are trotting this earthshattering breaking story now, finally telling you the “truth” (yeah, we lied a little bit about pangolins and bats, but it was for your own good, silly peasants!) because WHO treaty is happening now, and they need everyone to fall in line supporting the global totalitarian biosecurity state, where the unelected overlords will “protect you” from “lab leaks from enemies and rogue scientists”, by putting you in 15-minute prisons, I mean smart cities, and murdering you with protective military prototype “vaccines”.

If you still think lab leaks are a thing - please explain how they can happen, when nobody can produce animal to animal infection by “engineered viruses” inside the lab? But it can leak and infect the whole world outside the lab! Far from the lab and skipping areas in between! Just not inside it.

Please don’t fall for this narrative. There are no lab leaks. There is deliberate deployment of bio-chemical warfare agents, toxins of various kinds, pesticides and other chemicals. This deployment can be done via aerosols, formulations in food, transdermal, etc. These are deployed by the military enforcement arm of the global banking cartel, and they do not hold allegiance to any people or nations. The "unrestricted 5-th gen warfare” is not simply production of fake news on social media and lots of brainwashing, it is an actual elimination of people from this planet, and we are the targets.

My previous articles on how zoonotic virus and lab leak are both flavors of baloney are below.

P.S. whoever is talking about lab leaks with a serious face on Tucker Carlson show with a Ukrainian flag in the background, or a similar place of limited hangout - you can now easily tell they are working for WHO/Global cartel.

Art for today: A Lady with Yellow Flowers, oil on panel, 18x24 in

At least one of the escapees was intercepted with a broom, but others made it to freedom from Ralph Baric's secret biosecurity-level-infinity lab. Godspeed, brave little souls!

I have not heard of a global mouse pandemic, have you? Not even a local epidemic. Maybe the Mouse WHO (MWHO) needs to be alerted? Did mice practice Event 201 at Johns Mouse Hopkins and did they outline Mouse Agenda 2030? I have a lot of questions.

Here is the full report on this terrifying crisis that for some reason failed to generate a Jurassic Mouse Park in North Carolina or elsewhere.

Here is why I don't believe Boston University or any other academic clickbait about chimeric killer viruses they claim to make.  And neither should you.

To be sure, I think all of these boondoggles should be shut down, but not because they can actually produce an engineered deadly virus, but because they are wasting our money while simultaneously creating the fear propaganda about things they are not able to make. 

If you hear “every PhD student can make a deadly pathogen in a home lab” - please do not fall for this 3-letter agencies-inspired nonsense. While the techniques maybe available, these “engineered viruses” are duds that cannot and do not spread as they get rapidly attenuated by interaction with all living nature. To make something remotely dangerous one needs to make and purify A LOT of biological material, which is very expensive and requires substantial manufacturing facilities. PhD students do not have these kind of resources. You know who does? The Government-Military-Academia-Pharmaceutical complex that appropriates and spends billions to “keep you safe” from “rogue PhD students”. However, the government-academia-pharma cartel cannot make anything that lives and spreads by itself. They have to apply their biowarfare materials in some other ways, such as aerosols, gels and other formulations and even then it is only dangerous to small numbers of people and for a short period of time. Here’s Peter Daszak’s DEFUSE proposal to DARPA explaining how he was going to make these “novel automated aerosolization systems”, “transdermal nanoparticles applications”, and “edible adhesive gels” and test them on bat colonies in caves (which are probably a good model for a crowded city during the commuter hour).

Pandemics do not exist in nature. Epidemics, if they do occur are local and self-extinguishing, because that’s how nature works. The evil psychopaths cannot really make pandemics happen. They can only scare you into believing these are possible in order to gain control over you and establish their cherished dream - a global totalitarian biosecurity state. Be Not Afraid. Merry Christmas to all!

Art piece for today: Joan of Arc, oil on linen, 30x40 inches.